Ava's Reviews > Astrid Parker Doesn't Fail
Astrid Parker Doesn't Fail (Bright Falls, #2)
by
by
Sorry but no. Just no.
I kind of liked Delilah's book and I like Astrid as a character much more than any other character that appears in this series, so why did I dislike this so much? It has the same issues as Delilah, but somehow exacerbated and maybe I thought they would go away, but seeing them again made me just fed up?
So let's start with what I enjoyed, and that is Astrid. I just want to give her a hug.
But the list of my grievances will be long and bitter:
First of all, is it really so much to ask for, from an author of sapphic romances no less, to fuckin stop misrepresenting lesbians and lesbian culture? Oh my god. There will be references to stereotypes but no actual knowledge of lesbian terms. It's literally like "wow this woman has short hair, a total soft butch", butch is not an aesthetic, I scream into the void for the millionth time. Butch and femme are like "sapphic genders", it's a serious identity. Butch means subverting and performing masculinity in rejection of male gaze. Then we have the author making a lesbian character say "I don't do cis men". I'd like to believe that Blake just doesn't know how to use the word cis, because there's a couple more unnecessary instances in the book, but this one just reads especially wrong, the implication here is both lesbophobic and transphobic. And when it comes to trans topics... This book is such an example of a shallow perception of inclusivity. You have the narrative saying shit like "she was attracted exclusively to women and nonbinary people" (yeah. that is commonly known as a lesbian. you can use the word), and generally the phrase "women and nonbinary people" repeated ad nauseam but it feels performative because there's no actual nonbinary people involved in those situations? It's like Blake knows (I hope) that nonbinary lesbians exist so why not show us one, mention an ex partner like that at least? There is one nonbinary side character and I mean, they appear in like two scenes and their whole purpose is to showcase people introducing themselves with their pronouns. Nonbinary topics don't begin and end on pronouns....
But then in general, the way Blake writes about queerness just rubs me the wrong way, it feels like it's a club for the main friend group and they want to have their "queer coven" like it's some uniform experience for everyone and not complicated an varied experiences. She feels more concerned with showing it through questionable references instead, like Delilah's "queer pillows" or Jordan naming her truck ADORA (I can't get over this).
The main conflict is also something I found rather stupid? (view spoiler)
People were also just generally mean to Astrid in this book and it just felt shitty to read. Idk.
I will still read Iris's book but I'm not having any high hopes for it.
I kind of liked Delilah's book and I like Astrid as a character much more than any other character that appears in this series, so why did I dislike this so much? It has the same issues as Delilah, but somehow exacerbated and maybe I thought they would go away, but seeing them again made me just fed up?
So let's start with what I enjoyed, and that is Astrid. I just want to give her a hug.
But the list of my grievances will be long and bitter:
First of all, is it really so much to ask for, from an author of sapphic romances no less, to fuckin stop misrepresenting lesbians and lesbian culture? Oh my god. There will be references to stereotypes but no actual knowledge of lesbian terms. It's literally like "wow this woman has short hair, a total soft butch", butch is not an aesthetic, I scream into the void for the millionth time. Butch and femme are like "sapphic genders", it's a serious identity. Butch means subverting and performing masculinity in rejection of male gaze. Then we have the author making a lesbian character say "I don't do cis men". I'd like to believe that Blake just doesn't know how to use the word cis, because there's a couple more unnecessary instances in the book, but this one just reads especially wrong, the implication here is both lesbophobic and transphobic. And when it comes to trans topics... This book is such an example of a shallow perception of inclusivity. You have the narrative saying shit like "she was attracted exclusively to women and nonbinary people" (yeah. that is commonly known as a lesbian. you can use the word), and generally the phrase "women and nonbinary people" repeated ad nauseam but it feels performative because there's no actual nonbinary people involved in those situations? It's like Blake knows (I hope) that nonbinary lesbians exist so why not show us one, mention an ex partner like that at least? There is one nonbinary side character and I mean, they appear in like two scenes and their whole purpose is to showcase people introducing themselves with their pronouns. Nonbinary topics don't begin and end on pronouns....
But then in general, the way Blake writes about queerness just rubs me the wrong way, it feels like it's a club for the main friend group and they want to have their "queer coven" like it's some uniform experience for everyone and not complicated an varied experiences. She feels more concerned with showing it through questionable references instead, like Delilah's "queer pillows" or Jordan naming her truck ADORA (I can't get over this).
The main conflict is also something I found rather stupid? (view spoiler)
People were also just generally mean to Astrid in this book and it just felt shitty to read. Idk.
I will still read Iris's book but I'm not having any high hopes for it.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Astrid Parker Doesn't Fail.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
December 3, 2022
–
Started Reading
December 3, 2022
– Shelved
December 3, 2022
–
5.0%
"5% in and I'm already begging for the author to learn what butch and femme means"
December 3, 2022
–
6.0%
"Nooo please, stop with the references, you don't need to make your characters name cars/animals after She-Ra characters... I wrote like this when I was 13"
December 3, 2022
–
22.0%
"The clitoris necklace has made a second appearance. Why does it receive so much attention and discussion around it, remains a mystery"
December 3, 2022
–
41.0%
"The author making a lesbian character say "I don't do cis men" is SO FUCKING SUS. Why was "cis" specified? Trans men are men."
December 5, 2022
– Shelved as:
explicitly-lesbian-mc-li
December 5, 2022
– Shelved as:
overhyped
December 5, 2022
– Shelved as:
sapphic-rep
December 5, 2022
– Shelved as:
romance
December 5, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Mina
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Apr 18, 2023 10:34AM
I agreeeee, I think she handled queerness very strangely. It felt very superficial. The way she talks about identity like it's an aesthetic and "comp-het" when she doesn't seem to understand it. And how no characters have any internalized homophobia?
reply
|
flag
ugh this is so real re: queer culture and weird non-binary tokenism (like truly, has the author know any lesbians IRL??). i disliked it so much in Delilah Green and wasn’t even going to read Astrid Parker but someone convinced me to read Iris Kelly and I didn’t want to skip ahead in the series. I came into this cautiously optimistic that the issue would be handled better and I was so disappointed.