Marianna Neal's Reviews > The Shards
The Shards
by
by
608 pages...
608 pages!!
There is no reason for this book to be 608 pages, because as I was reading it most of my time was spent waiting for something to actually happen. Sometimes it did. Sometimes it didn't. Most of the time I was just reading about spoiled, horny teenagers in LA. Partying, thinking they're important, doing drugs, creating drama, having sex (lots of details in that department). Which is all great, and could have worked if it was just part of the story instead of most of the story. Call me crazy, but when you're reading 608-page book that technically also has a serial killer subplot... you kind of want more about that serial killer and less about horny teens. Is it just me? It can't be just me. And to be honest, the way things wrapped up was really frustrating.
Now, I am picking up on how the incessant desire to matter and be noticed, as well as to be taken seriously plays into the story that unfolds. I get it. It's interesting. Even despite some of dialogue that keeps going in circles, I still think the writing itself was mostly interesting and effective. But overall The Shards just didn't do enough of anything to justify its length. I was often bored and it was repetitive. There, I said it. It wasn't awful, I didn't hate it, but generally it was aggressively OK.
This was my first Bret Easton Ellis novel, and it seems like I chose poorly. Or maybe all of his books are like this and he's just not for me. I'll still give American Psycho a read at some point. Maybe.
608 pages!!
There is no reason for this book to be 608 pages, because as I was reading it most of my time was spent waiting for something to actually happen. Sometimes it did. Sometimes it didn't. Most of the time I was just reading about spoiled, horny teenagers in LA. Partying, thinking they're important, doing drugs, creating drama, having sex (lots of details in that department). Which is all great, and could have worked if it was just part of the story instead of most of the story. Call me crazy, but when you're reading 608-page book that technically also has a serial killer subplot... you kind of want more about that serial killer and less about horny teens. Is it just me? It can't be just me. And to be honest, the way things wrapped up was really frustrating.
Now, I am picking up on how the incessant desire to matter and be noticed, as well as to be taken seriously plays into the story that unfolds. I get it. It's interesting. Even despite some of dialogue that keeps going in circles, I still think the writing itself was mostly interesting and effective. But overall The Shards just didn't do enough of anything to justify its length. I was often bored and it was repetitive. There, I said it. It wasn't awful, I didn't hate it, but generally it was aggressively OK.
This was my first Bret Easton Ellis novel, and it seems like I chose poorly. Or maybe all of his books are like this and he's just not for me. I'll still give American Psycho a read at some point. Maybe.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Shards.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 6, 2023
– Shelved as:
to-read
January 6, 2023
– Shelved
January 23, 2023
–
Started Reading
January 23, 2023
– Shelved as:
mystery-thriller-horror
February 10, 2023
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Stephen
(new)
Feb 11, 2023 10:23AM
Great review, Marianna. Judging from this, I think you'd have a similar reaction to American Psycho: it has very little to say and it sounds like it has the same line in repetitive tedium as this book. Unless you are driven to read it, maybe give it a miss!
reply
|
flag
I'd also recommend skipping American Psycho. It was one of the worst and disgusting books I've ever read. I read it 25+ yrs ago and it still fills me with revulsion when I see it mentioned.
Just published Spanish version in Argentina. I was excited till I read your review 🤣. I think I'm pass