Eric Lander's Reviews > Going Infinite: The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon

Going Infinite by Michael   Lewis
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
2884431
's review

did not like it
Read 2 times

Having heard Sam Bankman-Fried try to explain himself on multiple podcasts during the FTX collapse, I was struck by how unusual he was. He is not your typical conman. I have extensive training in psychology and still couldn't quite figure this guy out. That's what makes this book so undeniably crazy. Michael Lewis got sucked into the vortex. His account of Bankman-Fried is ultimately a defense of Bankman-Fried's assertion that FTX wasn't fraud and was simply a comedy of errors. The evidence doesn't support this.

Michael Lewis had direct access to Bankman-Fried during the rise of FTX and ultimately the collapse, so he paints a seemingly thorough picture of the man and what drives him. It's fascinating the way people were drawn to Fried, including Lewis. The story of Fried playing video games during the Sequoia Capital meeting where they agreed to give him hundreds of millions of dollars blows my mind. Amazing how smart people can be so dumb. The whole thing reminds me of Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, though I find Fried infinitely more complicated than her (at least as a conman/woman).

The book provides a look at more then Fried. I did enjoy the elements of high-frequency trading, cryptocurrencies, philanthropy, bankruptcy, and the justice system.

I think Lewis was duped and he isn't self-aware enough to realize it. Perhaps he should read another big book that came out this fall that I gave five stars to, "Emotional Intelligence Habits" by Travis Bradberry.
147 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Going Infinite.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Finished Reading
Finished Reading
October 2, 2023 – Shelved

Comments Showing 1-6 of 6 (6 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Grace (new)

Grace Z What is even more interesting is that his law professor dad is also a licensed psychologist.


message 2: by John (new) - added it

John Yeah Michael Lewis still hasn't grappled with how much this guy conned him


message 3: by Harlow (new)

Harlow Interesting

Watching the author on PBS News Hour now.

Almost finished listening to “Elon Musk,” he avoided SBF.


patrick knowlan You may be right but there are a few uncomfortable issues that require explanation before I'll agree. First, there's the post-collapse accounting that suggests FTX was probably solvent when the authorities forced it into bankruptcy if the money transferred to Alameda Research was taken into account. Second is the inexperience of Bankman-Fried, all his senior people, and the complete lack of controllership in the companies. In 33 years as a management consultant I've seen several companies that looked like a train wreck in the hands of management teams that were totally out of their depth. I use Hanlon's Razor here not because it's unthinkable that Bankman-Fried was a con man, but because I don't think either he or his team displayed the financial acumen to pull this off. It looks to me more like an out-of-control train wreck than a long con.

That said, it is not a rejection of the notion that it was intentional, but Lewis's account does not answer the questions I would need as a juror to convict. IOW, reasonable doubt.

My other concern is how ruthless law enforcement can be when in the hands of someone who stands to profit handsomely by a successful conviction. When looking for experienced con-men, don't assume their good intentions.

If this were decided on the preponderance of evidence rather than reasonable doubt, I'd throw in with you.


Paula Fahey It sounds like you enjoyed quite a bit of the book, so your rating doesn’t match your review.


Johanna Maybe none of these people are as smart as anyone thinks.


back to top