Felicia's Reviews > Ancillary Justice

Ancillary Justice by Ann Leckie
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
666892
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: sci-fi

I'm almost wanting to give this five stars, because I LOVED it, but the first section of the book is very confusing ( in some ways by choice) and I think that could put some people off so there you go. 4 1/2 stars, ha!

This is a great sci-fi adventure following a character who is not man nor woman, and don't even try to figure it out, that's the confusing part. But the character is fomerly HUNDREDS of people, and a spaceship. All at once. Yeah, ok once you can wrap that around your head, it's SO GOOD this book. How the author accomplishes the changes of POV when someone is more than one person, is beyond me. It was deftly handled. And the plot is gripping and interesting, the other characters flawed but fascinating, and I was angry when the book came to a close, because I wanted the next one SO BAD.

Like I said, the whole gender thing was confusing (the lack and confusion of the main character about said subject), I understand it's a big idea and concept that is clever and unique, but I'm not sure I followed it entirely. A re-read would help. And maybe I'm just so weighted in NEEDING a gender for characters that I couldn't back up and relax about it? Who knows. Anyway, definitely a great book, makes sci-fi character based, and great world building. Highly recc!
216 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Ancillary Justice.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
January 27, 2014 – Shelved as: to-read
January 27, 2014 – Shelved
January 27, 2014 – Shelved as: sci-fi
January 27, 2014 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Tarot I agree, it's hard to rate this book because of its complexity and confusion, but it is worth a read. My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


message 2: by H (new) - rated it 4 stars

H Yes, I'd agree - the deliberate complexity means that I don't feel quite happy given it 5 stars. 4.5 would be right!


message 3: by Shelley (new)

Shelley Belsky I couldn't get past the first section.
Fortunately it was an eBook and only cost $1.99


Harry Glad you said that about the first section. I had the same thoughts, but I wasn't sure if it was the writing or if I just got used to it later. There are definitely parts later in the book where she handles very complex pov shifts (flashback + multiple bodies + gender ambiguity) with clarity. The early parts are harder to read.


Thalia What an interesting idea! Will have to check it out.


message 6: by Jim (new) - rated it 3 stars

Jim Hunt Phew :). I just started reading the book, and WHOA! Mind blown. Thank you for assuring me I'm not alone in my confusion. OK, back to the book ...


Josh Well, you sold it for me. I'm getting it. Thanks, Felicia!


Grace Definitely re-read - I almost consider this book an audience-participation experience, because I kept finding myself deliberately pulling out of the book to analyze exactly what my mind had supplied as context. Why did I suddenly worry about what this character has said? Because I'd assumed she was biologically female. Why am I envisioning this individual as male, were there any physical cues pointing that way or am I purely going off of dialogue that I apparently think "only a man could get away with saying this"? It's made me think a lot more about how I apply gender expectations in everyday life, and about how biased I can be.


message 9: by R.K. (new)

R.K. Syrus Even Jaqen H'ghar has a gender. A man hopes a great author gets all the outstanding recognition she has earned.


message 10: by Ryan (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ryan Hull I was about 70 pages into this and about to give up because I thought it was some needlessly feminist space opera (does everybody HAVE to be a woman?) and then I caught on and really dug it. A very good book and very original concept.


message 11: by Ryan (new) - rated it 4 stars

Ryan Hull I was about 70 pages into this and about to give up because I thought it was some needlessly feminist space opera (does everybody HAVE to be a woman?) and then I caught on and really dug it. A very good book and very original concept.


message 12: by John David (new)

John David SPOILER. you should have stopped at your first paragraph/sentence. that's plenty of information to recommend a book. "it's great, just don't give up after the confusing beginning."


message 13: by Darren (new)

Darren now I am curious.


Gritnay Got through the confusing beginning partly thanks to your review and ended up really enjoying the book!


message 15: by Amy (new) - rated it 4 stars

Amy Jesionowski I just finished this and thought it was FANTASTIC. I think the gender confusion was a deliberate and effective device that was expertly applied to allow us to attempt to wrap our heads around the legion that comprises Breq, as well as Mianaai and Vendaai (they're hundreds... thousands!... of consciousness as well as sentient spacecrafts: Mind.Blown.).


Jonathan Harbour I've tried reading this book 3x (2 audio, 1 text) and couldn't get to the halfway point without being bored with it. I'm a patient reader but this is mind numbing. If something great happens later, I'll never know. Also, the ideas people rave about like the mass consciousness entities is not original here at all, neither is most of the tech or characters--lifted from Ian M. Banks and Peter Hamilton.


back to top