Meghan's Reviews > The Sympathizer
The Sympathizer (The Sympathizer, #1)
by
by
Let's read a book about having sex with a dead squid. Because that happens in this book. Somehow I have an ability to pick out books like this. I suppose it's a gift. Just something about me that makes me me.
(Squid sex is only like two pages of three hundred and fifty, but I feel it's one of those things that sort of encapsulates what type of book a book is.)
The Sympathizer is a long book that could have been about one hundred and fifty pages shorter. It's a book of contradictions, such as the narrator incensed about other people erasing his comrades' proper names, ignoring the fact that he doesn't give proper names to a bunch of people either. It's a book where you keep thinking there's going to be a flashback with an origin story, except that flashback never comes. There's a lot of adjectives and description and over-writing, those stylistic quirks that other people find charming or engrossing, but which I just get annoyed with. And I got annoyed.
Repeatedly.
There's some stuff that isn't so bad. I appreciate the narrator tells you right away he's a double-agent. None of this sudden-surprise-twist-ending nonsense that has become so popular. He's a double-agent, his one friend Man is a communist, and his other friend Bon, is not. This is where the one hundred and fifty pages of completely transparent criticism of Francis Ford Coppola and Apocalypse Now could be cut (What's the point of that sidetrack? Unnecessary. Lose it.) and replaced with something, even a sentence of why, of three close friends, one-third went to one ideology, while two-thirds went to another.
The book isn't free of some twists, although they are obvious so I don't know if one can call them that. I'll say reveals instead I suppose. There's a lot of what I call blah blah blah political discussions, as one might assume would happen at the locale in which they happen in the novel (trying to avoid spoilers I am).
I don't know. It took me forever to read this book. I feel bad saying anything negative about it since the author clearly worked hard. So I'll say nothing and laugh because nothing ends up being vital to the story: Nothing is less precious than a bad review.
The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen went on sale April 7, 2015.
I received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
(Squid sex is only like two pages of three hundred and fifty, but I feel it's one of those things that sort of encapsulates what type of book a book is.)
The Sympathizer is a long book that could have been about one hundred and fifty pages shorter. It's a book of contradictions, such as the narrator incensed about other people erasing his comrades' proper names, ignoring the fact that he doesn't give proper names to a bunch of people either. It's a book where you keep thinking there's going to be a flashback with an origin story, except that flashback never comes. There's a lot of adjectives and description and over-writing, those stylistic quirks that other people find charming or engrossing, but which I just get annoyed with. And I got annoyed.
Repeatedly.
There's some stuff that isn't so bad. I appreciate the narrator tells you right away he's a double-agent. None of this sudden-surprise-twist-ending nonsense that has become so popular. He's a double-agent, his one friend Man is a communist, and his other friend Bon, is not. This is where the one hundred and fifty pages of completely transparent criticism of Francis Ford Coppola and Apocalypse Now could be cut (What's the point of that sidetrack? Unnecessary. Lose it.) and replaced with something, even a sentence of why, of three close friends, one-third went to one ideology, while two-thirds went to another.
The book isn't free of some twists, although they are obvious so I don't know if one can call them that. I'll say reveals instead I suppose. There's a lot of what I call blah blah blah political discussions, as one might assume would happen at the locale in which they happen in the novel (trying to avoid spoilers I am).
I don't know. It took me forever to read this book. I feel bad saying anything negative about it since the author clearly worked hard. So I'll say nothing and laugh because nothing ends up being vital to the story: Nothing is less precious than a bad review.
The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen went on sale April 7, 2015.
I received a copy free from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Sympathizer.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
May 12, 2015
– Shelved
May 12, 2015
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-17 of 17 (17 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Susan
(new)
May 29, 2016 02:06AM
Thank you for your review. I was interested in this book after hearing the author’s interview on the “Fresh Air” podcast, but no longer. I’m just not going near a book which has two pages of dead squid sex, Pulitzer Prize notwithstanding.
reply
|
flag
As I could see no way in which the squid sex advanced the narrative or enhanced the themes or overall message, I put this book down. I felt that this was an obvious shock for shock's sake, pandering to book clubs and reviewers who need something salacious to discuss. Kudos to you for sticking with it after the squidness.
To be fair, the squid sex was not a major part of the book but it did develop the idea of the confession.
ha ha, loved your first paragraph! I read the book and I thought it was good in many ways, but at the same time, I couldn't wait until it was over.
A book with several powerful scenes -- escape from Saigon and the murder of a suspected double agent -- but too many over-written, over-stuffed, over-explanatory passages. Typical of a first-time novelist. Too flawed to have won the Pulitzer, in my view. I took the squid scene as a riff on Philip Roth's liver scene in Portnoy's Complaint, but that may just show what generation I'm from.
I agree with you Meghan—it was a chore for me to complete this book! My book club chose this and I was determined to finish, however I would have preferred to pass after being half way through! The last pages were interesting about the torture— I knew torture was horrific but I found out it was even more horrific than I had thought! After finishing I was glad I completed the book as my challenge but this book to me got 5 star reviews it got because of politics! His style was confusing and so dry! The action that took place did not seem real to me! I think I gave it 3 stars but now I’m thinking that was way over the top—I think I’ll rate it at 1 star and move on!
I agree completely with the over writing comments. I began to think 'I'm just not getting this book' but I am hereby absolving myself. It's over-long, and if you are going to pepper the story with endless crisp philosophical statements, please make the book shorter. I never liked squid anyway.
Jeeez - what an unnecessarily mean-spitted review (at the end). The subject is obviously close to the author's heart. It's such a violent and ugly chapter in both Vietnamese and American history. I'm not sure how you can end your review being so flip about something so tragic.
To Howard's comment of "Portnoy's Complaint" and being of that generation, also, the squid-and-liver connection was made also by myself immediately while reading. Am also in complete agreement as to stylistic criticism of a freshman novelist. Worthy in some, if not many, aspects, but contrarily not enough for an award of the Pulitzer's literary stature. The prose is so hyper-metaphorically overworked that the effect becomes a shtick reminiscent of Raymond Chandler's vivid film-noir narrative. Perhaps as a cloak-and-dagger story, that is the author's intent, but imagine it rather more being a by-product of a beginner's initiation to the genre relying instead upon mimicry. And, therefore, a contrivance detracting from the narrative which would benefit most from more-authenticity.
I agree with a lot in your review. A little bit funny though that you start with the masturbation in a dead squid - in a book of war, betrayal, murder, torture, rape that part bother me the least
It's weird to me that the original review and several commenters are so focused on this one scene given the book is a commentary on the Vietnam War, colonialism, America's role and also how it continues to portray its role (we lost a war we shouldn't have fought and did unspeakable acts there yet media portrayals dehumanize the 'enemy' while trying to make Americans sympathetic). This review reads like they think this was pure fiction vs. grounded in actual history and makes me question whether the reviewer knows anything about the Vietnam War beyond American movies. The book is meant to have political and philosophical commentary and I disagree that it was a long or slow read. I don't know Portnoy's Complaint but the squid scene reminded me of Jason Biggs and the apple pie in American Pie, Timothy Chalamet and the peach in Call Me By Your Name, the Deep in The Boys, etc. (Basically, there seems to be a theme with adolescent males and food.) I found the scene almost amusing because it was so absurd but certainly didn't focus on such a small detail in the story.
Agree with you, Naomi. Also seems like complaints about the squid scene are missing the point of the squid scene. We all get squeamish over two pages about a kid putting his penis in something to see what it would feel like (which tbh, despite this being fiction, probably happens irl. Maybe not squid but little boys do weird shit) but what’s really obscene is murder. Torture. Genocide. Americans are so puritanical that we can’t have any discussions about bodies and sex but we can watch hundreds of documentaries about serial killers, show inexplicable violence in shows like Law & Order, and support a military brutally committing massacre after massacre across the globe. That’s the point of the scene — that you’re directing your moral outrage at the wrong issue.
And I agree with you too Kathleen. Some pages before said squid scene, the author wrote that the world would be a better place if people were more offended by the word murder than the word masturbation. And I guess the reactions prove his point. Some people put all their focus on this one masturbation scene when murder was happening all throughout the book.