Compare Cerner and Epic 
- Users report that Epic excels in Clinical Workflow Management, particularly with its Multiple Medical Provider Access feature, which received a score of 9.1 compared to Cerner's 8.2. Reviewers mention that this capability significantly enhances collaboration among healthcare providers.
- Reviewers mention that Epic's Meaningful Use Reporting feature stands out with a score of 8.9, while Cerner lags behind at 6.8. Users say that Epic's reporting tools are more intuitive and comprehensive, making compliance easier for healthcare organizations.
- G2 users highlight Epic's ePHI Storage capabilities, scoring 9.0, as superior to Cerner's 8.1. Users report that Epic provides more robust security measures and better data management options, which are crucial for patient information protection.
- Users on G2 indicate that Epic's Integration with EHRs is rated at 8.7, while Cerner does not have a comparable score. Reviewers mention that Epic's seamless integration capabilities streamline workflows and reduce administrative burdens.
- Reviewers say that Epic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.2, significantly higher than Cerner's 7.1. Users report that Epic's support team is more responsive and knowledgeable, which is vital for resolving issues quickly in a healthcare setting.
- Users report that Epic's Product Direction score of 8.9 reflects a strong commitment to innovation, while Cerner's score of 6.4 suggests a need for improvement. Reviewers mention that Epic's roadmap includes exciting new features that enhance user experience and functionality.
I liked that cerner was easy to use. Sections were labeled clearly which allowed me to find what I was looking for. I was also able to save things to make sure I was charting the correct material.
There are many things that i dislike, but the biggest concern I have is the fact that there seems to be multiple ways to carry out the same task. This leads to people being on different pages and sometimes things getting lost in the shuffle.
(1) Billing system integration (2) Automatic reminders (3) e-prescribing (4) Document scanning (5) Medication tracking (6) Allows for individualized templates for the patient history and physical examination which saves time when entering patient...
It seems too general, and our specialty is ophthalmology, so it’s kind of overkill for that specific task, and ordering tests, etc is a bit of a maze of screens
I liked that cerner was easy to use. Sections were labeled clearly which allowed me to find what I was looking for. I was also able to save things to make sure I was charting the correct material.
(1) Billing system integration (2) Automatic reminders (3) e-prescribing (4) Document scanning (5) Medication tracking (6) Allows for individualized templates for the patient history and physical examination which saves time when entering patient...
There are many things that i dislike, but the biggest concern I have is the fact that there seems to be multiple ways to carry out the same task. This leads to people being on different pages and sometimes things getting lost in the shuffle.
It seems too general, and our specialty is ophthalmology, so it’s kind of overkill for that specific task, and ordering tests, etc is a bit of a maze of screens