Compare AWS Fargate and Azure Container Instances 
- Users report that AWS Fargate excels in its integration with other AWS services, making it a preferred choice for those already invested in the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Azure Container Instances is noted for its seamless integration with Azure services, which is particularly beneficial for enterprises already using Microsoft products.
- Reviewers mention that AWS Fargate offers robust access control features, scoring 8.7, which allows for fine-grained permissions and security management. Azure Container Instances, while also strong, has a slightly lower score in this area, indicating that users may find it less flexible in managing access controls.
- G2 users highlight that the ease of setup for both AWS Fargate and Azure Container Instances is comparable, with scores of 8.6 and 8.5 respectively. However, users on G2 note that AWS Fargate's documentation is more comprehensive, which can lead to a smoother onboarding experience.
- Users say that the quality of support for Azure Container Instances is rated higher at 8.7 compared to AWS Fargate's 8.2. This suggests that Azure may provide more responsive and helpful customer service, which can be crucial for businesses needing quick resolutions.
- Reviewers mention that AWS Fargate's orchestration capabilities, with a score of 8.6, are particularly strong, allowing for efficient management of containerized applications. In contrast, Azure Container Instances, while effective, may not offer the same level of orchestration features, which could be a consideration for users needing advanced management tools.
- Users report that both platforms have similar ratings for ease of use, at 8.9, but AWS Fargate is often praised for its user-friendly interface, which can enhance productivity for teams new to container management. Azure Container Instances, while easy to use, may require a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with Azure's environment.
i have been using AWS Fargate for 1 year , it's a launch type within existing ECS(Elastic Container Service) , before introducing it most customer were running their application on AWS EC2 only , and that was really hard to configure and as a cloud...
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
The Azure Container Instances service provides fast and isolated computing resources that can be used in the event of traffic increases
As with many things Microsoft, intuitiveness is lacking in how different resources relate to each other.
i have been using AWS Fargate for 1 year , it's a launch type within existing ECS(Elastic Container Service) , before introducing it most customer were running their application on AWS EC2 only , and that was really hard to configure and as a cloud...
The Azure Container Instances service provides fast and isolated computing resources that can be used in the event of traffic increases
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
As with many things Microsoft, intuitiveness is lacking in how different resources relate to each other.