Compare Azure DevOps Server and Git 
- Users report that Azure DevOps Server excels in "Deployment-Ready Staging" with a score of 8.9, making it a strong choice for enterprises that require robust staging environments. In contrast, Git, while highly regarded, does not have a specific score for this feature, indicating it may not be as focused on deployment readiness.
- Reviewers mention that Azure DevOps Server's "Integration" capabilities score 8.6, allowing seamless connections with various tools and services. Git, however, shines in "Integrations" with a higher score of 8.9, suggesting it offers a broader range of integrations that appeal to small businesses looking for flexibility.
- G2 users highlight Azure DevOps Server's "Processes and Workflow" management with a score of 8.9, which is particularly beneficial for teams needing structured workflows. Conversely, Git's "Processes and Workflow" score of 8.7 indicates it is slightly less robust in this area, which may affect larger teams with complex processes.
- Users on G2 report that Azure DevOps Server's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.2, which is satisfactory but not exceptional. In comparison, Git's support quality is rated higher at 8.6, suggesting that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using Git.
- Reviewers say that Azure DevOps Server's "Ease of Setup" is rated at 7.1, which may pose challenges for new users. In contrast, Git's score of 8.8 indicates a more user-friendly setup process, making it a better option for teams looking to get started quickly.
- Users report that Azure DevOps Server has a "Product Direction" score of 7.9, which may indicate some uncertainty about future updates. Git, with a score of 9.0, suggests a more positive outlook on its development trajectory, appealing to users who prioritize long-term viability.
I love TFS. I love the way it tracks bugs, I love the way it manages and tracks deployments to different environments, and I love the way it manages test cases, test plans, requirements, and features, as well as tasks. Our company currently has it set up so...
sometimes it's a little bit slow working with this tools, and when you havn't connection with the server, you can have a lot of error messages. a little bit frustrating, it can be a little bit smarter to handle some problems. However, there aren't any...
Git's branching model is the best of the version control systems-- lightweight branches that can be switched and merged at will. It's also very fast and diskspace-light because of the way it stores only incremental changes for each commit. It's easy to move...
Not easy to use as a file tracker software, man ways to work with it, but not always easy read checkin to main repo details.
I love TFS. I love the way it tracks bugs, I love the way it manages and tracks deployments to different environments, and I love the way it manages test cases, test plans, requirements, and features, as well as tasks. Our company currently has it set up so...
Git's branching model is the best of the version control systems-- lightweight branches that can be switched and merged at will. It's also very fast and diskspace-light because of the way it stores only incremental changes for each commit. It's easy to move...
sometimes it's a little bit slow working with this tools, and when you havn't connection with the server, you can have a lot of error messages. a little bit frustrating, it can be a little bit smarter to handle some problems. However, there aren't any...
Not easy to use as a file tracker software, man ways to work with it, but not always easy read checkin to main repo details.