Compare GitLens and SourceTree 
- Users report that SourceTree's user interface is intuitive and visually appealing, making it easier for beginners to navigate through their repositories, while GitLens is praised for its seamless integration with Visual Studio Code, enhancing the coding experience directly within the editor.
- Reviewers mention that SourceTree excels in providing a comprehensive visual representation of branches and commits, which helps users understand their project history better, whereas GitLens offers powerful inline blame annotations that allow users to see who made changes and why, directly in the code.
- G2 users highlight that SourceTree's support quality is somewhat lacking, with a score of 8.1, while GitLens users report a much higher satisfaction with support, scoring 9.2, indicating a more responsive and helpful customer service experience.
- Users on G2 say that SourceTree has a steeper learning curve for advanced features, which can be a barrier for some users, while GitLens is noted for its ease of setup and integration, allowing users to get started quickly without extensive configuration.
- Reviewers mention that SourceTree is particularly favored by small businesses for its free version, which offers a robust set of features, while GitLens is more popular among mid-market users who appreciate its advanced features and capabilities tailored for larger teams.
- Users report that while SourceTree has a solid overall rating of 4.3, GitLens shines with a higher rating of 4.8, reflecting its strong performance and user satisfaction, particularly in meeting requirements and ease of use.
According to my opinion gitlens is very useful when i want to know who written this code and we get all history regarding that code and we can also get pull request on github. GitLens excels at providing detailed line-by-line blame annotations that unlock...
Honestly, I haven't seen any demerits of it yet but it adds valuable information, to make it better they can show more information about the person who has written the code.
I like the best thing about SourceTree is the UserInterface. After the terminal, it makes it so much easier to understand the flow of the commits and projects.
background tasks (e.g. git fetch) block selected actions (e.g. git pull)
According to my opinion gitlens is very useful when i want to know who written this code and we get all history regarding that code and we can also get pull request on github. GitLens excels at providing detailed line-by-line blame annotations that unlock...
I like the best thing about SourceTree is the UserInterface. After the terminal, it makes it so much easier to understand the flow of the commits and projects.
Honestly, I haven't seen any demerits of it yet but it adds valuable information, to make it better they can show more information about the person who has written the code.
background tasks (e.g. git fetch) block selected actions (e.g. git pull)