Compare PostgreSQL and SingleStore 
- Users report that PostgreSQL excels in data schema management with a score of 9.2, while SingleStore slightly outperforms it with a score of 9.3, indicating that SingleStore may offer more advanced features for structuring data.
- Reviewers mention that SingleStore has a superior query optimizer, scoring 9.1 compared to PostgreSQL's 8.6, which suggests that users may experience faster query performance and efficiency when using SingleStore.
- G2 users highlight that SingleStore's advanced indexing capabilities, scoring 9.0, provide better performance for complex queries compared to PostgreSQL's score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring high-speed data retrieval.
- Users on G2 report that SingleStore's disaster recovery features are rated higher at 8.8, compared to PostgreSQL's 8.6, indicating that SingleStore may offer more robust solutions for data protection and recovery.
- Reviewers say that PostgreSQL has a strong reputation for data types, scoring 9.2, but SingleStore closely follows with a score of 9.3, suggesting that both databases are versatile, though SingleStore may have a slight edge in supporting diverse data formats.
- Users report that SingleStore's overall ease of use is rated higher at 8.7 compared to PostgreSQL's 8.5, which may make SingleStore a more user-friendly option for teams looking to minimize the learning curve.
One of PostgreSQL's best features is strong adherence to the ANSI-SQL:2008 standard, which makes it a very comfortable choice when switching from other database systems. It's open source, well maintained, industry proven and battle-hardened, with a rich set...
Replication, at least in 2006-2007 was slony and log-shipping. Slony would fail to create new replicas after about 100 gigs on somewhat serious enterprise hardware due to it recreating the database via a pg_dump method which obviously stops working after...
Accessing and Loading relational data into tables is pretty efficient, reliable and fast. Having Singlestore employee as a consultant in the organisation helped us get answers from Singlestore to resolve a lot of minor issues and questions we had with this...
It's unusable as ANSI compliant SQL server. Single and simple insert, update and delete do not work. Data can be loaded faster if it is in perfectly formatted CSV file. It frequently runs out of memory. We have 3 nodes with 2 aggregates with total of 160GB...
One of PostgreSQL's best features is strong adherence to the ANSI-SQL:2008 standard, which makes it a very comfortable choice when switching from other database systems. It's open source, well maintained, industry proven and battle-hardened, with a rich set...
Accessing and Loading relational data into tables is pretty efficient, reliable and fast. Having Singlestore employee as a consultant in the organisation helped us get answers from Singlestore to resolve a lot of minor issues and questions we had with this...
Replication, at least in 2006-2007 was slony and log-shipping. Slony would fail to create new replicas after about 100 gigs on somewhat serious enterprise hardware due to it recreating the database via a pg_dump method which obviously stops working after...
It's unusable as ANSI compliant SQL server. Single and simple insert, update and delete do not work. Data can be loaded faster if it is in perfectly formatted CSV file. It frequently runs out of memory. We have 3 nodes with 2 aggregates with total of 160GB...