Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Tricentis Testim and mabl 
Featured Products
Sponsored
PFLB
(37)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
BetterQA
(169)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
Sponsored
Postman
(1534)
Automation Testing
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us Per Year
Tricentis Testim
Star Rating
(50)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Tricentis Testimmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tricentis Testim excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to quickly implement testing solutions. In contrast, mabl's ease of setup score is lower at 8.8, indicating a slightly more complex onboarding process.
- Reviewers mention that mabl shines in test feedback with a score of 9.1, highlighting its robust feedback mechanisms that help teams quickly identify issues. Conversely, Tricentis Testim has a lower score of 8.0 in this area, suggesting that its feedback features may not be as comprehensive.
- G2 users indicate that Tricentis Testim offers superior test history tracking with a score of 9.2, which is crucial for teams needing to analyze past test results. mabl does not provide a score for this feature, suggesting it may not be as strong in this area.
- Users on G2 report that both products have similar organization and reporting capabilities, each scoring 8.3. However, mabl edges out slightly in reliability with a score of 9.0 compared to Tricentis Testim's 8.7, indicating a more dependable performance in real-world scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Tricentis Testim has a strong customization feature with a score of 8.7, allowing teams to tailor their testing processes. mabl, while slightly higher at 8.8, does not significantly outperform Testim in this regard, suggesting both offer valuable customization options.
- Users say that Tricentis Testim has a positive product direction score of 9.4, indicating strong future development and support, while mabl's score of 8.7 suggests it may not be as forward-thinking in its roadmap.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Tricentis Testim
No pricing availablemabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Tricentis Testim
No trial information availablemabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
38
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.3
40
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.6
12
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.0
12
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.2
39
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
12
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
40
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
6
9.1
17
8.7
5
9.2
17
8.9
6
8.8
17
8.9
6
8.5
17
Automation
8.1
6
8.3
16
8.6
6
9.0
17
8.6
6
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Tricentis Testim and mabl are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Tricentis Testim
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
44.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.5%
Internet
6.4%
Program Development
4.3%
Other
23.4%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Most Helpful Reviews
Tricentis Testim
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Siddharth W.
Verified User in Computer Software
No Code required for UI Tests Record and play functionality for testing makes a non-technical person able to test an app Very user friendly unlike Ghost Inspector and Screenster New features could be added to the regression suite for testing in no...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Non-Profit Organization Management
It's not ideal for teams like mine that prefer tools with a balance of high flexibility and low to no code options
mabl
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Mahesh C.
Verified User in Animation
Below are the critical features of MABL: 1. Brilliant record and playback feature. 2. Genius provision to add quick assertions. 3. JS snippets available to script independently on the available features. 4. Excellent auto-heal feature and feasibility to...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Food Production
Inconsistencies in testing environments
Siddharth W.
Verified User in Computer Software
No Code required for UI Tests Record and play functionality for testing makes a non-technical person able to test an app Very user friendly unlike Ghost Inspector and Screenster New features could be added to the regression suite for testing in no...
Mahesh C.
Verified User in Animation
Below are the critical features of MABL: 1. Brilliant record and playback feature. 2. Genius provision to add quick assertions. 3. JS snippets available to script independently on the available features. 4. Excellent auto-heal feature and feasibility to...
Verified User in Non-Profit Organization Management
It's not ideal for teams like mine that prefer tools with a balance of high flexibility and low to no code options
Verified User in Food Production
Inconsistencies in testing environments
Discussions
Tricentis Testim has no discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.