Float.com Pricing Overview

edit

Free Trial

Starter

Starting at $7.00

Per Month

Essentials for basic resourcing.

Pro

Starting at $12.00

Per Month

Advanced resourcing with actuals tracking. Includes all of Starter, plus:

Enterprise

Expert partnership, from start to finish. Includes all of Pro, plus:

Flexible pricing that scales with your team. Get started today with our free, 30 day trial to find the plan that’s your best match.

Float.com has 3 pricing editions. A free trial of Float.com is also available. Look at different pricing editions below and see what edition and features meet your budget and needs.

Pricing information for Float.com is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Float.com must be conducted with the seller.

Visit float.com/pricing for additional details or request a demo with sales at float.com/talk-to-sales.

Pricing information was last updated on October 16, 2025

Top-Rated Alternatives

Kantata Professional Services Automation (formerly Mavenlink+ Kimble)

View All Alternatives

Float.com Pricing Reviews

(2)

Verified User in Information Technology and Services

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

11/15/2024

"Float is simple to use yet effective"

5/5

What do you like best about Float.com?

Easy to visualise, filter and see information Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Float.com?

Nothing I can think of, it seems very good to me Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Consulting

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

10/28/2025

"Great for Team Scheduling, But User Management Needs Work"

2/5

What do you like best about Float.com?

It’s particularly helpful as a centralized source of truth for team availability and project scheduling. Having a consolidated overview helps in coordinating activities and preventing over-allocations or gaps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Float.com?

The user management experience could be improved. For instance, when a user is archived, they still appear in the dropdown menus for project allocation. This creates confusion, increases the risk of planning errors, and requires unnecessary manual checks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.