IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
71.040
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Das Geheimnis einer Stepford-Frau liegt hinter den Türen der Men's Association, wie Frauen anders werden und immobilisierte Roboter.Das Geheimnis einer Stepford-Frau liegt hinter den Türen der Men's Association, wie Frauen anders werden und immobilisierte Roboter.Das Geheimnis einer Stepford-Frau liegt hinter den Türen der Men's Association, wie Frauen anders werden und immobilisierte Roboter.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 wins total
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe location used for the rotunda of the Men's Club was the same one used in the original film.
- PatzerWhen the family is driving to Stepford, Pete says "But why are we moving?". Kimberly can be clearly seen mouthing his line before saying "to Conneticut?"
- Zitate
Claire Wellington: I asked myself, "Where would people never notice a town full of robots?"
[gasps]
Claire Wellington: Connecticut.
- Crazy CreditsIn the credits, Corning is credited with "cutlured stone" rather than "cultured stone".
Ausgewählte Rezension
I have read plenty of reviews where people are comparing this to 1975's, I don't think that's fair, as the interpretation of the novel is very different. The original film was very much a horror, this is a comedy with virtually no horror at all, but a definite vibe of political correctness.
It is obviously too sweet and syrupy for many, but it does have good points. It's loaded with irony, it's not laugh out loud humour, it's more tongue in cheek, with some good humour, mainly at the expense of little men. I liked the performances, Glenn Close and Bette Midler especially. It wasn't Kidman's finest hour, although she wasn't bad, just didn't get the best material to work with.
On the debit side, Matthew Broderick doesn't exactly shine, but worst of all is the lack of any horror vibe, it doesn't really have any suspenseful moments of any note.
It's a nice vanilla comedy, those looking for horror must avoid. The original movie is way better. 6/10
It is obviously too sweet and syrupy for many, but it does have good points. It's loaded with irony, it's not laugh out loud humour, it's more tongue in cheek, with some good humour, mainly at the expense of little men. I liked the performances, Glenn Close and Bette Midler especially. It wasn't Kidman's finest hour, although she wasn't bad, just didn't get the best material to work with.
On the debit side, Matthew Broderick doesn't exactly shine, but worst of all is the lack of any horror vibe, it doesn't really have any suspenseful moments of any note.
It's a nice vanilla comedy, those looking for horror must avoid. The original movie is way better. 6/10
- Sleepin_Dragon
- 2. Nov. 2018
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Stepford Wives?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- The Stepford Wives
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 90.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 59.484.742 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 21.406.781 $
- 13. Juni 2004
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 103.370.281 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 33 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen