Ein verurteilter Brandstifter schaut, um einen Bewährungshelfer in einen Plan zu manipulieren, um seine Bewährung zu sichern, indem er seine schöne Frau auf den Weg des Polizisten setzt.Ein verurteilter Brandstifter schaut, um einen Bewährungshelfer in einen Plan zu manipulieren, um seine Bewährung zu sichern, indem er seine schöne Frau auf den Weg des Polizisten setzt.Ein verurteilter Brandstifter schaut, um einen Bewährungshelfer in einen Plan zu manipulieren, um seine Bewährung zu sichern, indem er seine schöne Frau auf den Weg des Polizisten setzt.
- Warden
- (as Peter Lewis)
- Guard #2
- (as Rich Goteri)
- Guard #3
- (as Ron Lyons)
- Pastor
- (as Dave Hendricks)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesEdward Norton spent time with real prisoners in the Southern Michigan Correctional Facility. He adopted his character's accent and cornrow hairstyle from the prisoners. Norton inserted phrases he heard from the prisoners into the dialogue.
- Zitate
[last lines]
Radio Interviewer: [talking calls] Next up here is Gerald, from south west Detroit. Welcome, Gerald.
Stone: I, I just wanna say, I got this book. They say that when you experience a spiritual truth, that it comes to you through sound. If you let this sound go through you, it changes you, you know? Puts you back into harmony. You know, it makes you like a tuning fork of God.
Radio Interviewer: Okay...
Stone: Yeah. They say, they say, you can start with small things, like little vibrations. You know, sound of a bee, sound of a buzzing light, and then it grows.
Radio Interviewer: All right. That's interesting.
Stone: Well, they say that everything that happens to you is what was supposed to happen to you, for you to advance. But you gotta come back lots a times, cycle through many lives until you learn, so you can grow.
Radio Interviewer: Well, thanks for your input. Next time up here in the WDDL listener line is Kathy in Farmington...
[fades out]
- VerbindungenReferenced in Maltin on Movies: No Strings Attached (2011)
It's dialogue-heavy as Norton philosophizes his way to freedom, and it's supposed to be character-rich as we watch De Niro try to remain sane as both Norton and his wife Milla Jovovich work their angles on him. But these are just messed up characters that I knew less about at the end than I did at the beginning. The film has clear problems when the only somewhat likable character is the guiltless criminal Norton. But I would say it's bigger problems are with the fact that it's supposed to be a thriller, but all you have is De Niro and Norton jabbering back and forth until nothing is clear and very little of consequence or action occurs. There is even a religious undertone to the whole film, but I have no idea what they were trying to say with that.
I'm sure De Niro and Norton deliver great performances as they always do, but when their characters are poorly written and make no sense, you can't watch a film for the acting. The director was overly concerned with detail, framing every scene and adding nuance to each shot, which is great in some films, but in "Stone", it would have served him better to just try and tell a story from beginning to end.
- napierslogs
- 15. Nov. 2010
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Stone?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 22.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 1.810.078 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 75.766 $
- 10. Okt. 2010
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 10.300.416 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 45 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1