Der Familienvater Justin Kemp, der als Geschworener in einem hochkarätigen Mordprozess mit einem ernsten moralischen Dilemma zu kämpfen hat.Der Familienvater Justin Kemp, der als Geschworener in einem hochkarätigen Mordprozess mit einem ernsten moralischen Dilemma zu kämpfen hat.Der Familienvater Justin Kemp, der als Geschworener in einem hochkarätigen Mordprozess mit einem ernsten moralischen Dilemma zu kämpfen hat.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 Gewinne & 12 Nominierungen insgesamt
Melanie Harrison
- Campaign Manager
- (Synchronisation)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesKiefer Sutherland got his part by writing to Clint Eastwood telling him how big a fan of his he was, and that he wanted to star in one of his movies before he retired. Kiefer's dad, Donald Sutherland, had co-starred with Clint in Stoßtrupp Gold (1970) and Space Cowboys (2000).
- PatzerJuror #2 is sitting in the third seat, not the second seat.
- Zitate
Larry Lasker: We're only as sick as our secrets.
- VerbindungenFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Best Movies of 2024 (2024)
- SoundtracksHard Livin'
Written by Chris Stapleton and Kendell Marvel
Performed by Chris Stapleton
Courtesy of Mercury Nashville Records
Under license from Universal Music Enterprises
Ausgewählte Rezension
Juror #2 directed by the iconic Clint Eastwood, Juror #2 brings together an incredible cast led by Kiefer Sutherland, Nicholas Hoult, Toni Collette, and J. K. Simmons. This courtroom drama explores the complexities of jury deliberation in a murder trial that involves themes of domestic abuse. The story is immediately engaging, setting up a clear-cut case, but it soon dives deep into moral territory, where the right verdict is anything but straightforward.
As a non-U. S. viewer, I found the trial process and jury dynamics especially fascinating. Eastwood cleverly exposes the issues of biased jurors and the impact of personal agendas. The film makes you question how often jurors-pressed by personal motivations outside the courtroom-lose sight of the real deliberation required to reach a just decision. This theme feels disturbingly relevant and is well-executed here.
Though this is Eastwood's 45th directorial work, I'd say Juror #2 isn't his best. At times, it struggles with pacing, which occasionally dampens the tension that should be building. Still, the stellar performances from the cast and the moral questions it raises make it a thought-provoking watch, and it's a worthwhile addition to Eastwood's body of work.
As a non-U. S. viewer, I found the trial process and jury dynamics especially fascinating. Eastwood cleverly exposes the issues of biased jurors and the impact of personal agendas. The film makes you question how often jurors-pressed by personal motivations outside the courtroom-lose sight of the real deliberation required to reach a just decision. This theme feels disturbingly relevant and is well-executed here.
Though this is Eastwood's 45th directorial work, I'd say Juror #2 isn't his best. At times, it struggles with pacing, which occasionally dampens the tension that should be building. Still, the stellar performances from the cast and the moral questions it raises make it a thought-provoking watch, and it's a worthwhile addition to Eastwood's body of work.
- SinceNovember2000
- 1. Nov. 2024
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Juror #2?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 30.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 24.800.000 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 54 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen