Añade un argumento en tu idiomaExpensive diamonds are stolen but before the thief can fence them he is strangled by ex-con Cueball, who then takes the gems and continues murdering people he believes are trying to swindle ... Leer todoExpensive diamonds are stolen but before the thief can fence them he is strangled by ex-con Cueball, who then takes the gems and continues murdering people he believes are trying to swindle him.Expensive diamonds are stolen but before the thief can fence them he is strangled by ex-con Cueball, who then takes the gems and continues murdering people he believes are trying to swindle him.
- Mona Clyde
- (as Rita Corday)
- Ship Officer
- (sin acreditar)
- Lester Abbott
- (sin acreditar)
- Crewman
- (sin acreditar)
- Drunk
- (sin acreditar)
- Steve
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe second of four classic Dick Tracy movies released by RKO from 1945 to 1947.
- PifiasWhen Mona Clyde places a note under the shop door to the Priceless Antiques shop, she seemingly placed it entirely under the door. However, when Tracy comes by to retrieve it, a large portion of the note is visible before it's picked up on the other side.
- Citas
Pat Patton: I called Sparkle's house.
Dick Tracy: Did you say who you were?
Pat Patton: No! Do you think I'm that dumb?
Dick Tracy: Well, we won't go into that.
- Créditos adicionalesOpening credits list 'Introducing' Cueball (see also entry under 'Trivia'.
- ConexionesEdited into Who Dunit Theater: Dick Tracy vs Cueball (2015)
Now I DID see DICK TRACY VS. CUEBALL a long time ago and found it was pretty bad. However, decades later, I watched it again with my daughter and we both felt it was a decent film with a few excellent moments. Now this ISN'T a glowing endorsement, but I found I did need to go back to my reviews of other Tracy films I reviewed a few months back and remove any negative references to this film. So, for lovers of B-movies and especially series detective movies, this IS worth a look.
So why did I like it on second viewing? Well, it wasn't because of the villain, played by Dick Wessel. His bald wig was at times obvious but the biggest problem was he had the charisma of a wet sock and said very little other than "I oughta kill you" or other such bland threats. A tuna might have made a better villain. However, Morgan Conway's Dick Tracy was a lot better Ralph Byrd (who starred in the next two films). Sure, Conway's face looked pot-marked and he was, to put it charitably, "not handsome"....but he COULD deliver his lines and he had a nice voice. Though he looked nothing like the cartoon character--which is probably why they replaced him with the super-wooden Byrd. I also liked the small role by Vitamin. He was completely annoying and mindless in DICK TRACY'S DILEMMA, but here the same actor was actually given some good lines and wasn't asked to play the character as a complete moron.
At only about an hour, it's a tidy and interesting little film. Not great, but not bad at all. And if you like this one, be sure to see the first film (DICK TRACY, DECECTIVE)--it's even better.
By the way, look for the slimy little guy with greasy hair and super-thick glasses. Other than Rondo Hatton, he is perhaps the ugliest character actor from 1940s film.
- planktonrules
- 27 abr 2007
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Dick Tracy möter biljardbollen
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Empresa productora
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 2 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1