PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,5/10
3 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
En el siglo XVIII, Louis de Bourguignon trabaja con la banda de Malichot, pero sus costumbres son en extremo poco éticas para él.En el siglo XVIII, Louis de Bourguignon trabaja con la banda de Malichot, pero sus costumbres son en extremo poco éticas para él.En el siglo XVIII, Louis de Bourguignon trabaja con la banda de Malichot, pero sus costumbres son en extremo poco éticas para él.
- Premios
- 1 nominación en total
Jacques Hilling
- L'aubergiste
- (as Jacques Hiling)
Raoul Billerey
- Un complice de Cartouche
- (as Raoul Bilrey)
Alain Dekok
- Louison
- (as Alain Dekock)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesSixth highest grossing movie of the year in France.
- Versiones alternativasWest German theatrical version was cut by approx. 14 minutes.
- ConexionesFeatured in De Cartouche au Cavaleur (2013)
Reseña destacada
While this certainly isn't one of the deeper or meaningful costume dramas I have seen, I must admit it's a lot of fun--even though the character played by Jean-Paul Belmondo is crazy when it comes to his relationship with the lady played by Claudia Cardinale. It's in many ways a re-telling of the Robin Hood story in 18th century France--with a much more flawed main character. Like Mr. Hood, Cartouche steals from the rich and gives to the poor, but unlike Robin (who was quite happy with Maid Marion, thank you very much), once Cartouche got the girl of any man's dreams, it just wasn't good enough. Claudia Cardinale played a ravishing young thief who was desperately in love with him and ultimately would do anything for Cartouche--and the idiot keeps looking at other women! Ultimately he understands the stupidity of this, but by then it's just too late.
The story excels when it comes to exciting fights and costumes. However, at times, it lets the viewer down because the mood of the film seems to shift too much--almost like there were several versions of the film and they morphed them together. On one hand, it's a romance and in that department it does an excellent job. On the other, it's an exciting adventure yarn and once again it succeeds in this department. But, at some points in the movie (particularly when Cartouche is in the army), it also tries to be a pretty broad comedy. I actually think the film might have been better if the entire thing had been comedy or they removed the comedy altogether. It just seemed disjoint and odd the way it changed styles. However, regardless of this, the film is still worth seeing and is a lot of fun.
The story excels when it comes to exciting fights and costumes. However, at times, it lets the viewer down because the mood of the film seems to shift too much--almost like there were several versions of the film and they morphed them together. On one hand, it's a romance and in that department it does an excellent job. On the other, it's an exciting adventure yarn and once again it succeeds in this department. But, at some points in the movie (particularly when Cartouche is in the army), it also tries to be a pretty broad comedy. I actually think the film might have been better if the entire thing had been comedy or they removed the comedy altogether. It just seemed disjoint and odd the way it changed styles. However, regardless of this, the film is still worth seeing and is a lot of fun.
- planktonrules
- 8 sept 2006
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is Cartouche?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- Países de origen
- Sitio oficial
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- Swords of Blood
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- La Couvertoirade, Aveyron, Francia(fortified town, battle front)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 54 minutos
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Cartouche (1962) officially released in India in English?
Responde