ÉVALUATION IMDb
6,6/10
42 k
MA NOTE
Un adolescent et ses amis font face à un mystérieux pilleur de tombes armé d'un terrible arsenal d'armes mortelles.Un adolescent et ses amis font face à un mystérieux pilleur de tombes armé d'un terrible arsenal d'armes mortelles.Un adolescent et ses amis font face à un mystérieux pilleur de tombes armé d'un terrible arsenal d'armes mortelles.
- Prix
- 2 victoires et 2 nominations au total
A. Michael Baldwin
- Mike
- (as Michael Baldwin)
Kenneth V. Jones
- Caretaker
- (as Ken Jones)
Lynn Eastman-Rossi
- Sally
- (as Lynn Eastman)
Dac Coscarelli
- Funeral Guest
- (uncredited)
Kate Coscarelli
- Funeral Guest
- (uncredited)
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesDon Coscarelli rented all of the filming equipment used to make this movie, always on Fridays so he could use it all weekend and return it on Mondays, all the while only actually having to pay one day's rental on the equipment.
- GaffesWhen The Tall Man breaks down the door of Mike's house, at the bottom of the door, a crew person's feet are visible running and pushing the door.
- Citations
The Tall Man: Boooy!
- Générique farfeluThe cable TV version has extra text in the credits that reads, "Enter the Tall Man's Mausoleum, if you dare, at www.phantasm.com"
- Autres versionsNew Line/Image Collector's Edition laserdisc features a separate section with one deleted scene (struck from a what appears to be a work print as there is no music and sound is limited to dialogue only). The scene has Mike telling big brother Jody about weird goings-on he has witnessed at the cemetery. Jody then gets Mike drunk and takes him to Reggie's ice cream parlor, where they start a food fight. Then it cuts to a scene the next day where Jody stops by the bank where he works and visits his girlfriend.
- ConnexionsEdited into Phantasm: Behind the Scenes 1995 Featurette (1995)
Commentaire en vedette
As a low budget production Phantasm is a solid 10/10. It has an inventive story line and some highly memorable moments. It features the iconic floating metallic sphere, the iconic Tall Man and his iconic catch phrase "Bo-ay!" (Boy!). The production was very nonprofessional - no money, no script, no schedule - and Don Coscarelli must have been guided by an extremely lucky star, when he managed to transform many diverging elements into a movie that seems to be planned that way. Even a scene that absolutely looks like a filler - two guys plaing guitars - later turns out to have been a somewhat important part of the plot.
With regards to its production history, this is a miraculous movie. But people who don't care about that, shouldn't expect too much. After all, this is a very low budget science fiction horror movie from 1979 and it does have quite a few flaws, not only the obvious technical ones. Sometimes the story gets too silly, experts in glorifying call this "dream logic". And the final twist is, at least today, really annoying. But it is not boring, it is strange and it is definitely worth watching. It is the best of the 5 "Phantasm" movies, all of them made by Coscarelli.
Phantasm II (1988) has better special effects, better dwarfs, more spheres, an even better pronunciation of "Bo-ay!". But it looks like there had been a growing demand for a sequel, but Coscarelli didn't really have a story to tell. That should be part of the logic of dreams: No sequels! Phantasm III (1994) offers some new ideas and plot elements. It's a bit insane. Yes, the pesky "dream logic" is in the movie title, but it's nothing to build on. Coscarelli should nonetheless have gotten rid of it after the first Phantasm. Phantasm IV (1998) and Phantasm: Ravager (2016) are quite similar: artsy melancholical swansongs. "Artsy", actually.
After watching the 4 sequels, the triumph of Phantasm (1979) seems even more glorious! How is this even possible? Coscarelli had more money, he had more skills, more knowledge, more time, he had had a lot of input from fans and critics of his movies. First and foremost of course it is the imperfection of Phantasm 1 that should have made it easy to top it. Still that didn't happen. The erratic movie logic - for some it's a nightmare.
With regards to its production history, this is a miraculous movie. But people who don't care about that, shouldn't expect too much. After all, this is a very low budget science fiction horror movie from 1979 and it does have quite a few flaws, not only the obvious technical ones. Sometimes the story gets too silly, experts in glorifying call this "dream logic". And the final twist is, at least today, really annoying. But it is not boring, it is strange and it is definitely worth watching. It is the best of the 5 "Phantasm" movies, all of them made by Coscarelli.
Phantasm II (1988) has better special effects, better dwarfs, more spheres, an even better pronunciation of "Bo-ay!". But it looks like there had been a growing demand for a sequel, but Coscarelli didn't really have a story to tell. That should be part of the logic of dreams: No sequels! Phantasm III (1994) offers some new ideas and plot elements. It's a bit insane. Yes, the pesky "dream logic" is in the movie title, but it's nothing to build on. Coscarelli should nonetheless have gotten rid of it after the first Phantasm. Phantasm IV (1998) and Phantasm: Ravager (2016) are quite similar: artsy melancholical swansongs. "Artsy", actually.
After watching the 4 sequels, the triumph of Phantasm (1979) seems even more glorious! How is this even possible? Coscarelli had more money, he had more skills, more knowledge, more time, he had had a lot of input from fans and critics of his movies. First and foremost of course it is the imperfection of Phantasm 1 that should have made it easy to top it. Still that didn't happen. The erratic movie logic - for some it's a nightmare.
- xroo-73772
- 17 janv. 2023
- Lien permanent
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et surveiller les recommandations personnalisées
Détails
- Date de sortie
- Pays d’origine
- Site officiel
- Langue
- Aussi connu sous le nom de
- Phantasm
- Lieux de tournage
- Dunsmuir House & Gardens - 2960 Peralta Oaks Court, Oakland, Californie, États-Unis(Morningside cemetery)
- société de production
- Consultez plus de crédits d'entreprise sur IMDbPro
Box-office
- Budget
- 300 000 $ US (estimation)
- Brut – États-Unis et Canada
- 11 988 469 $ US
- Brut – à l'échelle mondiale
- 11 988 469 $ US
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant