NOTE IMDb
7,1/10
6,8 k
MA NOTE
Axel Freed est professeur de littérature et une passion pour le jeu. Quand il perd tout son argent et en emprunte à sa petite amie, puis à sa mère, il cumule les dettes sans pouvoir s'arrête... Tout lireAxel Freed est professeur de littérature et une passion pour le jeu. Quand il perd tout son argent et en emprunte à sa petite amie, puis à sa mère, il cumule les dettes sans pouvoir s'arrêter de jouer.Axel Freed est professeur de littérature et une passion pour le jeu. Quand il perd tout son argent et en emprunte à sa petite amie, puis à sa mère, il cumule les dettes sans pouvoir s'arrêter de jouer.
- Réalisation
- Scénario
- Casting principal
- Récompenses
- 1 nomination au total
Histoire
Le saviez-vous
- AnecdotesAccording to James Toback, before his screenplay was accepted at Paramount Pictures, and was making the rounds with actors, Peter Boyle was first interested in playing the lead. Robert De Niro lobbied hard for the role, to the point where De Niro started to dress like the writer. Toback pressured director Karel Reisz to meet with De Niro. After meeting him, Reisz said that he would not, and could not consider De Niro for the role, and if Toback kept insisting, he would not be allowed to collaborate on the film further.
- GaffesAxel knocks the pimp's hat off on the second punch. It reappears on his head on the following one.
- ConnexionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Gambling Movies (2014)
- Bandes originalesSymphony No. 1 in D
Written by Gustav Mahler (as Mahler)
Performed by Koninklijk Concertgebouworkest (as The Concertgebouw Orchestra)
Conducted by Bernard Haitink (as Haitink)
Courtesy of Philips Records
Commentaire à la une
Just about everyone who has posted a reply about the shocking ending was simply left too much in the dark to realize that it tied together a different root demise of Axel Freed than gambling.
Just as a compulsive behavior leads to compulsive gambling, the root evil of Axel Freed was that he had a masochist behavior. When you look a little closer at all the scenes where he acts out this kind of behavior, it makes more sense. The problem lies in that the casual observer is only looking at the problem gambling aspect. There is more to this guy than just that.
The ways he handles his relationships with his mother, girlfriend, grandfather and feelings at the end towards the basketball player ALL indicate there is masochist behavior involved. These are more than just selfish acts. There is some actual self hatred going on as well. Without giving away the final scene, this scene further accentuates the point by sending himself into that situation. The final scene was a conscious act, not something resulting from random chance or risk.
So despite the movie having some gambling theme to it, this really wasn't necessarily about gambling addiction. It was about the nature of Axel Freed. If the movie had no gambling scenes in it at all this point would be more readily identifiable.
The only real oddity in the final scene is the placement of the final scene. If this scene was placed somewhere in the middle of the movie, the underlying theme of his masochist pattern of behavior would have been more easily identified with. Because the movie started with a gambling scene, we all assumed it was just about gambling. Wrong!
Its a tricky concept to catch the first time. Watch this movie again with this concept in mind and the movie will make more sense.
Just as a compulsive behavior leads to compulsive gambling, the root evil of Axel Freed was that he had a masochist behavior. When you look a little closer at all the scenes where he acts out this kind of behavior, it makes more sense. The problem lies in that the casual observer is only looking at the problem gambling aspect. There is more to this guy than just that.
The ways he handles his relationships with his mother, girlfriend, grandfather and feelings at the end towards the basketball player ALL indicate there is masochist behavior involved. These are more than just selfish acts. There is some actual self hatred going on as well. Without giving away the final scene, this scene further accentuates the point by sending himself into that situation. The final scene was a conscious act, not something resulting from random chance or risk.
So despite the movie having some gambling theme to it, this really wasn't necessarily about gambling addiction. It was about the nature of Axel Freed. If the movie had no gambling scenes in it at all this point would be more readily identifiable.
The only real oddity in the final scene is the placement of the final scene. If this scene was placed somewhere in the middle of the movie, the underlying theme of his masochist pattern of behavior would have been more easily identified with. Because the movie started with a gambling scene, we all assumed it was just about gambling. Wrong!
Its a tricky concept to catch the first time. Watch this movie again with this concept in mind and the movie will make more sense.
Meilleurs choix
Connectez-vous pour évaluer et suivre la liste de favoris afin de recevoir des recommandations personnalisées
- How long is The Gambler?Alimenté par Alexa
Détails
Box-office
- Montant brut aux États-Unis et au Canada
- 1 305 782 $US
- Durée1 heure 51 minutes
- Mixage
- Rapport de forme
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuer à cette page
Suggérer une modification ou ajouter du contenu manquant
Lacune principale
By what name was Le flambeur (1974) officially released in India in English?
Répondre