सुपरमैन लोइस लेन के साथ संबंध शुरू करने के लिए अपनी शक्तियों का बलिदान करने के लिए सहमत है, इस बात से अनजान है कि तीन क्रिप्टोनियन अपराधी जो उसने अनजाने में जारी किए थे, वे पृथ्वी पर विजय प्... सभी पढ़ेंसुपरमैन लोइस लेन के साथ संबंध शुरू करने के लिए अपनी शक्तियों का बलिदान करने के लिए सहमत है, इस बात से अनजान है कि तीन क्रिप्टोनियन अपराधी जो उसने अनजाने में जारी किए थे, वे पृथ्वी पर विजय प्राप्त कर रहे हैं.सुपरमैन लोइस लेन के साथ संबंध शुरू करने के लिए अपनी शक्तियों का बलिदान करने के लिए सहमत है, इस बात से अनजान है कि तीन क्रिप्टोनियन अपराधी जो उसने अनजाने में जारी किए थे, वे पृथ्वी पर विजय प्राप्त कर रहे हैं.
- पुरस्कार
- 5 जीत और कुल 1 नामांकन
- Lex Luthor
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Clark Kent
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- …
- Jor-El
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Otis
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Perry White
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Ursa
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Lois Lane
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Non
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Eve Teschmacher
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Sheriff
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- The President
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Jimmy Olsen
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- General Zod
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Controller #1
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Controller #2
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Nate
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- Boris
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- (as Jim Dowdell)
- Prison Warder
- (आर्काइव फ़ूटेज)
- (as Angus McInnes)
कहानी
क्या आपको पता है
- ट्रिविया(at around 16 mins) The actor playing Clark Kent yelling out to Lois Lane after she jumps out of the Daily Planet is not Christopher Reeve. An uncredited actor was brought in to film the shot for the DVD release.
- गूफ़Superman turns back time so that General Zod, Ursa and Non never leave the Phantom Zone, but we aren't shown how Superman deals with the missiles launched at the end of the first Superman movie - meaning, after turning back time, they should escape again, if Superman dealt with the nuclear missiles in the same manner. (This is a problem that actually stems from the first movie, where we aren't shown Superman dealing with the crisis in a different fashion after Lois dies - he shows up at Lois' car, and the aftershocks that caused her death just never happen.)
The next scene we see is meant to be the beginning of the movie again, with the Daily Planet - so after the nuclear explosions, and before the arrival of the villains - but Clark goes back to straighten out the trucker who hit him afterwards - though because Superman turned back time, basically, this event never happened - so Clark was hitting an innocent man for no reason. (The diner owner says that he just had the place fixed up - meaning the scuffle did occur, and Clark claims he's been working out, meaning from the last time they saw him, when he was beaten - however, again, this never happened because Superman turned back time again.)
Moreover, towards the end of the film, Superman destroys the Fortress of Solitude with his heat-sight - the Fortress of Solitude should be reconstructed (and with Jor-El available to guide Kal-El again) due to Superman turning back time again. The time travel device, beyond complicating the film's time-line, nullifies Jor-El's sacrifice and Superman's lesson, as after turning back time, things should be "back to normal" again.
Furthermore, if Superman's end-game was to turn back time all along, he didn't have to fight the super-villains in Metropolis or in the Fortress of Solitude at all - he could have turned back time immediately after regaining his powers, or following the Metropolis fight.
- भाव
Lois Lane: You ARE Superman, aren't you?
Clark Kent: Lois, now we've been through these haullcinations of yours before. Can't you see what you almost did? Throwing yourself off a building 30 stories high? Can't you see what a tragic mistake you almost made?
Lois Lane: I made a mistake. I made a mistake because
[Lois pulls out a gun]
Lois Lane: I risked my life instead of yours.
Clark Kent: Lois... don't be insane!
Lois Lane: And don't fall down 'cause you're just going to have to get up again!
Clark Kent: Lois, don't be crazy now... LOIS!
[Lois fires at Clark, who just stands there with a stern look on his face]
Lois Lane: [Lois looks at amazement] It IS you...
[Clark takes off his glasses to reveal that he is indeed Superman]
Lois Lane: I guess I've known this for the longest time.
Clark Kent: You realize, of course, if you had been wrong, Clark Kent would've been killed.
Lois Lane: [Lois holds up the gun] With a blank?
[Clark closes his eyes in embarassment]
Lois Lane: Gotcha!
Clark Kent: [Clark sits down ready to talk]
- क्रेज़ी क्रेडिटAfter the Warner Bros./DC Comics logos, there is an on-screen dedication "in loving memory" of Christopher Reeve, "Without whom we would have never believed a man could fly".
- कनेक्शनEdited from Superman II (1980)
Why do I go through that explanation? Well...because from the complains I've heard and read it seems that people don't seem to understand that. So, that's why I felt it should be addressed.
Now, on to the review...
Donner was hired by the Salkinds in '76 or '77 to direct two Superman films at the same time. When time and money was running out the decision was made to stop production on Superman II and focus on the first one. By that point Donner had already completed about 80% of the film. When Superman became the biggest hit of 1978 the decision by the Salkinds was to fire Donner. He was replaced by Richard Lester (A Hard Day's Night) and Lester re-shot most of the film. Only about 30% of Donner's work remained.
After almost 30 years WB finally released Donner's version since most fans demanded to see it. And, on the DVD, Donner, thanks the fans which I felt was a nice touch.
The plot of the movie is the same as Lester's Superman II. General Zod and his goons escape the Phantom Zone. They arrive at Earth (or Planet Houston as they call it) and quickly take over. And, where's Superman? He made the mistake of giving up his powers to be with Lois Lane. So, will Superman recover his powers on time to save Earth from Zod? You will have to watch the film to find out.
Now, the question on everyone's mind is whether or not this version is truly better than Lester's take. The answer is yes! Why? Because Lester never really understood the material. Which is prove when you watch Superman III. Donner, on the other hand, truly understood the material. He understood that...YES...it's a comic book adaptation but it's still an art form. As silly as Superman may seem he understands that there is a wonderful story to tell. And, he understands that there is wonderful characters to develop and have an audience understand and fall in love with. When you watch this DVD that's what you'll see. A film directed by a man in love with the material. Not a film by a man who did it for the money. If you love Superman: The Movie then you'll love Richard Donner's version of Superman II. The ONLY flaw of this version is that it was never completed.
- MannyCastro
- 27 नव॰ 2006
- परमालिंक
टॉप पसंद
विवरण
बॉक्स ऑफ़िस
- बजट
- $5,40,00,000(अनुमानित)
- चलने की अवधि1 घंटा 56 मिनट
- रंग
- ध्वनि मिश्रण
- पक्ष अनुपात
- 2.39 : 1