VALUTAZIONE IMDb
7,1/10
6759
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
James Caan ritrae un giocatore compulsivo che non riesce né a smettere né a vincere. Deve alla mala 40.000 dollari, ma non riesce a trattenersi dal brivido dell'ultima giocata.James Caan ritrae un giocatore compulsivo che non riesce né a smettere né a vincere. Deve alla mala 40.000 dollari, ma non riesce a trattenersi dal brivido dell'ultima giocata.James Caan ritrae un giocatore compulsivo che non riesce né a smettere né a vincere. Deve alla mala 40.000 dollari, ma non riesce a trattenersi dal brivido dell'ultima giocata.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
- Premi
- 1 candidatura in totale
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAccording to James Toback, before his screenplay was accepted at Paramount Pictures, and was making the rounds with actors, Peter Boyle was first interested in playing the lead. Robert De Niro lobbied hard for the role, to the point where De Niro started to dress like the writer. Toback pressured director Karel Reisz to meet with De Niro. After meeting him, Reisz said that he would not, and could not consider De Niro for the role, and if Toback kept insisting, he would not be allowed to collaborate on the film further.
- BlooperAxel knocks the pimp's hat off on the second punch. It reappears on his head on the following one.
- ConnessioniFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Gambling Movies (2014)
- Colonne sonoreSymphony No. 1 in D
Written by Gustav Mahler (as Mahler)
Performed by Koninklijk Concertgebouworkest (as The Concertgebouw Orchestra)
Conducted by Bernard Haitink (as Haitink)
Courtesy of Philips Records
Recensione in evidenza
Just about everyone who has posted a reply about the shocking ending was simply left too much in the dark to realize that it tied together a different root demise of Axel Freed than gambling.
Just as a compulsive behavior leads to compulsive gambling, the root evil of Axel Freed was that he had a masochist behavior. When you look a little closer at all the scenes where he acts out this kind of behavior, it makes more sense. The problem lies in that the casual observer is only looking at the problem gambling aspect. There is more to this guy than just that.
The ways he handles his relationships with his mother, girlfriend, grandfather and feelings at the end towards the basketball player ALL indicate there is masochist behavior involved. These are more than just selfish acts. There is some actual self hatred going on as well. Without giving away the final scene, this scene further accentuates the point by sending himself into that situation. The final scene was a conscious act, not something resulting from random chance or risk.
So despite the movie having some gambling theme to it, this really wasn't necessarily about gambling addiction. It was about the nature of Axel Freed. If the movie had no gambling scenes in it at all this point would be more readily identifiable.
The only real oddity in the final scene is the placement of the final scene. If this scene was placed somewhere in the middle of the movie, the underlying theme of his masochist pattern of behavior would have been more easily identified with. Because the movie started with a gambling scene, we all assumed it was just about gambling. Wrong!
Its a tricky concept to catch the first time. Watch this movie again with this concept in mind and the movie will make more sense.
Just as a compulsive behavior leads to compulsive gambling, the root evil of Axel Freed was that he had a masochist behavior. When you look a little closer at all the scenes where he acts out this kind of behavior, it makes more sense. The problem lies in that the casual observer is only looking at the problem gambling aspect. There is more to this guy than just that.
The ways he handles his relationships with his mother, girlfriend, grandfather and feelings at the end towards the basketball player ALL indicate there is masochist behavior involved. These are more than just selfish acts. There is some actual self hatred going on as well. Without giving away the final scene, this scene further accentuates the point by sending himself into that situation. The final scene was a conscious act, not something resulting from random chance or risk.
So despite the movie having some gambling theme to it, this really wasn't necessarily about gambling addiction. It was about the nature of Axel Freed. If the movie had no gambling scenes in it at all this point would be more readily identifiable.
The only real oddity in the final scene is the placement of the final scene. If this scene was placed somewhere in the middle of the movie, the underlying theme of his masochist pattern of behavior would have been more easily identified with. Because the movie started with a gambling scene, we all assumed it was just about gambling. Wrong!
Its a tricky concept to catch the first time. Watch this movie again with this concept in mind and the movie will make more sense.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is The Gambler?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 1.305.782 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 51 minuti
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was 40.000 dollari per non morire (1974) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi