Sophia, una brillante scienziata, viene a sapere che un grande squalo sta nuotando nelle profondità del fiume.Sophia, una brillante scienziata, viene a sapere che un grande squalo sta nuotando nelle profondità del fiume.Sophia, una brillante scienziata, viene a sapere che un grande squalo sta nuotando nelle profondità del fiume.
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizAlthough it may appear that a large number of triathletes are swimming in the Seine, this was not the case. Those scenes were filmed at an open-air water tank in Alicante, Spain. (Famously, the Seine has been deemed too polluted to swim in, something which the French authorities have spent upwards of a billion euros to rectify.)
- BlooperWhen displaying the 3000 miles journey of the shark, it is shown to have swum up the wrong river, namely the Loire, that flows about 200 km south of Paris. The mayor of Orléans, a prominent city on the Loire, cheekily urged his citizens not to panic if they caught a glimpse of a huge fin, that would just be the lost shark hurrying on its way to shoot the movie.
- Colonne sonoreA Fin in the Water
composed by Anthony D'Amario, Alex Cortés & Edouard Rigaudière
Recensione in evidenza
You know how there's a whole set of films that's based on stupid people making stupid decisions?
Person 1: DON'T DO IT!
Person 2: *proceeds to do it anyway and gets killed* Audience: SHE TOLD YOU NOT TO DO IT! How dumb are you!?
Those types movies. However, if they're done well, you don't mind the stupidity in it and play along.
I kept reading "If you liked Jaws, you'll enjoy Under Paris." "One of the best Shark films since Jaws" - High praise. So, I had to watch it, despite low scores.
The dumb people in this film don't listen, do dumb things, and get killed. But it's been filmed well; it's intense, the sound design and cinematography keep you engaged. Shark graphics - decent enough. It's got enough going on to keep you engaged, the plot is not boring at all. The ending may have you scratching your head though.
Here's a perspective that I don't think anybody is considering - I don't know the first thing about Shark Biology or marine evolution, but I looked at the 'Sharks' as a metaphor for 'Climate Change' and the plot AND the ending suddenly made so much more sense. That made me feel like the movie was actually better than people are making it out to be.
Either that, or I'm just trying to convince myself that I didn't waste 2 hours watching stupid people make stupid decisions.
Person 1: DON'T DO IT!
Person 2: *proceeds to do it anyway and gets killed* Audience: SHE TOLD YOU NOT TO DO IT! How dumb are you!?
Those types movies. However, if they're done well, you don't mind the stupidity in it and play along.
I kept reading "If you liked Jaws, you'll enjoy Under Paris." "One of the best Shark films since Jaws" - High praise. So, I had to watch it, despite low scores.
The dumb people in this film don't listen, do dumb things, and get killed. But it's been filmed well; it's intense, the sound design and cinematography keep you engaged. Shark graphics - decent enough. It's got enough going on to keep you engaged, the plot is not boring at all. The ending may have you scratching your head though.
Here's a perspective that I don't think anybody is considering - I don't know the first thing about Shark Biology or marine evolution, but I looked at the 'Sharks' as a metaphor for 'Climate Change' and the plot AND the ending suddenly made so much more sense. That made me feel like the movie was actually better than people are making it out to be.
Either that, or I'm just trying to convince myself that I didn't waste 2 hours watching stupid people make stupid decisions.
- TreeFiddy53
- 7 giu 2024
- Permalink
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Under Paris?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Budget
- 25.000.000 € (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 44 minuti
- Colore
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.78 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti