Segue as duas familias mias ricas dos Estados Unidos e seus conflitos pelo control da sua fortuna e seus filhos.Segue as duas familias mias ricas dos Estados Unidos e seus conflitos pelo control da sua fortuna e seus filhos.Segue as duas familias mias ricas dos Estados Unidos e seus conflitos pelo control da sua fortuna e seus filhos.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória e 3 indicações no total
Explorar episódios
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe champagne the characters drink is actually sparkling water with a hint of tea for color.
- Erros de gravaçãoIn various episodes, Fallon and Blake keep referring to their "family dynasty". This is a linguistic error (known as a tautology or a pleonasm), as a dynasty is a family by definition. The word "family" is therefore redundant.
- ConexõesFeatured in MsMojo: Top 10 Guilty Pleasure TV Shows (2020)
Avaliação em destaque
Just watched the pilot of this and I don't get to whom it is addressed...
Is it the past Audience? Who can recognize Bill Conti's theme played in the piano by a young Steven Carrington and know the characters already? I highly doubted since that audience is around 65-70 y.o. and can't understand and relate with the "modern" direction and editing and music of the 2017's version.
Is it a new Audience? Then why bother with this premise. Reviving an old series which was heavily based on the personas of actors like John Forsythe, Joan Collins and Linda Evans. The "aristocrat" look, without having similar actors to work with.
Anyway, such a reboot is a waste of time, in my opinion. It is basically realized because maybe the inspiration hit a ceiling and we live in the age of old reboots.
As a show its too light to watch. Too pseudo-arrogant and pretentious. None of the actual billionaires I watch interviews and such, are emphasizing words like in this show. "It is a deal of 500 MIIILLL-ion dollars", like a game show host or like in an advertisement.
And it tries too hard to "play" with the audience. like in the revelation/presentation of the Cristal character, which reach us to my original question "...to whom it is addressed?" The past audience won't watch it, the new audience won't get it.
Overall: I don't see a ...Dynasty grow out of this. It lacks the larger-than-life actors/characters of the original and its too pretentious for each own sake.
.
Is it the past Audience? Who can recognize Bill Conti's theme played in the piano by a young Steven Carrington and know the characters already? I highly doubted since that audience is around 65-70 y.o. and can't understand and relate with the "modern" direction and editing and music of the 2017's version.
Is it a new Audience? Then why bother with this premise. Reviving an old series which was heavily based on the personas of actors like John Forsythe, Joan Collins and Linda Evans. The "aristocrat" look, without having similar actors to work with.
Anyway, such a reboot is a waste of time, in my opinion. It is basically realized because maybe the inspiration hit a ceiling and we live in the age of old reboots.
As a show its too light to watch. Too pseudo-arrogant and pretentious. None of the actual billionaires I watch interviews and such, are emphasizing words like in this show. "It is a deal of 500 MIIILLL-ion dollars", like a game show host or like in an advertisement.
And it tries too hard to "play" with the audience. like in the revelation/presentation of the Cristal character, which reach us to my original question "...to whom it is addressed?" The past audience won't watch it, the new audience won't get it.
Overall: I don't see a ...Dynasty grow out of this. It lacks the larger-than-life actors/characters of the original and its too pretentious for each own sake.
.
- Dr_Sagan
- 12 de out. de 2017
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Dynasty have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente