AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,2/10
13 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Na à ndia do século XIX, três soldados britânicos e um portador de água nativo devem parar um reavivamento em massa secreto do culto Thuggee assassino antes que ele possa invadir a terra.Na à ndia do século XIX, três soldados britânicos e um portador de água nativo devem parar um reavivamento em massa secreto do culto Thuggee assassino antes que ele possa invadir a terra.Na à ndia do século XIX, três soldados britânicos e um portador de água nativo devem parar um reavivamento em massa secreto do culto Thuggee assassino antes que ele possa invadir a terra.
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória no total
Charles Bennett
- Telegraph Operator
- (não creditado)
Gene Coogan
- Lancer
- (não creditado)
Jimmy Dime
- Thug
- (não creditado)
George Du Count
- Pandu Lal
- (não creditado)
Anna May the Elephant
- Elephant
- (não creditado)
Enredo
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe gong in the title sequence is the same one used to summon King Kong six years earlier.
- Erros de gravaçãoBallantine and MacChesney are bound and gagged when the last Thuggee is about to behead them after Gunga Din sounds the alarm. Cutter shoots the Thuggee and Ballantine and MacChesney are unbound as they rush to Cutter's side.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThe credits appear on a gong. Standing next to the gong is a Hindu man, and every time he strikes the gong, the credits change.
- Versões alternativasGerman theatrical version was cut by approx. 12 minutes. This version was later shown on TV but never released on any home media format. Only in 2018 the film was released on DVD, with approx. 4 minutes restored.
- ConexõesFeatured in Odeio Essa Mulher (1959)
Avaliação em destaque
I have seen "Gunga Din" several times. It is not a strict re-telling of the Kipling work but a studio era take on it. It is jingoistic and hokey but it is an entertaining and uplifting film.
Those that bemoan the "un-PC" tone of the film need to look at it in context. The underlying theme of the piece is that these British soldiers come to hold a member of a group of people they had (until that time) regarded as savages, in higher regard than most of their compatriots. The ideas of universal human qualities and nobility are driven home in a very emotional, if a little ham-fisted way. Considering the racial atmosphere in America at the time, this was not exactly a statement without some daring.
To condemn this film or the original story for racism is to miss the point entirely. That was the time and for its time, the messages here are incredibly progressive. Besides, even if the film were racist, only a fool discards a classic piece of art because he or she disagrees with the content of the message. Pretty much all critics and film historians list Griffith's "Birth of a Nation" somewhere in the top 3 films of all time, regardless of the fact that the heroes of the picture are the KKK. The message was wrong but the film transformed the whole of film-making forever. Do we discard that too? Do we burn all copies of Joseph Conrad's novella "Heart of Darkness" because some perceive the narrator to be a bigot? To do so would be robbing generations of a classic example of well crafted storytelling at its best. Such behavior is ignorance in its basest form.
But, you know, that's just what I think.
Those that bemoan the "un-PC" tone of the film need to look at it in context. The underlying theme of the piece is that these British soldiers come to hold a member of a group of people they had (until that time) regarded as savages, in higher regard than most of their compatriots. The ideas of universal human qualities and nobility are driven home in a very emotional, if a little ham-fisted way. Considering the racial atmosphere in America at the time, this was not exactly a statement without some daring.
To condemn this film or the original story for racism is to miss the point entirely. That was the time and for its time, the messages here are incredibly progressive. Besides, even if the film were racist, only a fool discards a classic piece of art because he or she disagrees with the content of the message. Pretty much all critics and film historians list Griffith's "Birth of a Nation" somewhere in the top 3 films of all time, regardless of the fact that the heroes of the picture are the KKK. The message was wrong but the film transformed the whole of film-making forever. Do we discard that too? Do we burn all copies of Joseph Conrad's novella "Heart of Darkness" because some perceive the narrator to be a bigot? To do so would be robbing generations of a classic example of well crafted storytelling at its best. Such behavior is ignorance in its basest form.
But, you know, that's just what I think.
- crankyerma
- 1 de ago. de 2004
- Link permanente
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Gunga Din?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Aufstand in Sidi Hakim
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 1.910.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 57 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.37 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente