If you seek a well-written review, I recommend Kkaterhyne's. Their critique closely aligns with my personal experience of the movie. I highly recommend reading the book, as it is significantly superior to the film adaptation. Why alter the original story for the movie? The ending failed to evoke the same emotional impact as the book. In the book, Michael served as her therapist, possessing the ability to manipulate her. Where is his brother? The portrayal of Nick's mother felt forced and lacked authenticity. While the passionate scenes were present, they lacked emotional resonance. I cannot pinpoint the exact reason, but it almost felt as though I was watching a different movie, one that lacked the familiarity and charm of the original. The music in this adaptation also deviated from the original, contributing to the sense of disconnection. The first movie was a resounding success and garnered immense popularity, while this one feels like a low-budget production.