IMDb RATING
6.8/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
At the end of WW2, aboard a repatriation ship, an Army doctor reminisces about his war years while being interviewed by a reporter.At the end of WW2, aboard a repatriation ship, an Army doctor reminisces about his war years while being interviewed by a reporter.At the end of WW2, aboard a repatriation ship, an Army doctor reminisces about his war years while being interviewed by a reporter.
Jessica Grayson
- Sarah, Johnson's Maid
- (as Jessie Grayson)
John Albright
- Corpsman
- (uncredited)
Frank Arnold
- Maitre d'Hotel
- (uncredited)
Peggy Badley
- Nurse Betty Simpson
- (uncredited)
Art Baker
- Williams, Reporter on Transport Ship
- (uncredited)
Gregg Barton
- Captain
- (uncredited)
Nanette Bordeaux
- Nurse
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaAccording to the AFI catalog entry for this film, for the battle scenes in Italy MGM constructed five 35-foot towers, a full-sized evacuation hospital, and more than 100 Army tents at the Lasky-Mesa movie ranch 35 miles outside of Hollywood. The set took three weeks to build and the scenes used hundreds of extras, five cameras and six assistant directors. This was all for a re-creation of the historic capture of the Anzio beachhead in Italy by U.S. and British forces on January 22, 1944.
- GoofsAt the end, Penny Johnson says she followed her husband's movements on a map. During World War II, people in the military had it drilled into them that they could not say anything about where they were in letters sent back home, and to make sure they kept that rule, the mail from soldiers was heavily censored. This has been mentioned in numerous histories of World War II. Personal experience backs this up. A relative sailed all over the world during the War and the censors made no attempt to mask the fact that they had opened and read his mail. So, the relative's spouse started sending a stick of gum in letters but always included two sticks --- an extra one for the censor. Most times, that second stick was gone. With Clark Gable being an officer, it's even less likely any information about his movements around Europe would have been available to his wife.
- ConnectionsEdited from Waterloo Bridge (1940)
Featured review
The main reason for me seeing 'Homecoming' was the cast, made up of many talented actors. Mervyn LeRoy was on the most part a more than competent director, especially love 'Waterloo Bridge', 'Gold Diggers of 1933' and most of all 'Random Harvest', and generally do like World War II films (despite traps of being melodramatic and heavy-handed and some have fallen into those traps.
While not being completely enamoured by it, do agree with those here that like 'Homecoming' and consider it better than give credit for. Despite its faults (from respectful personal opinion), 'Homecoming' is much better than the critical reception it got at the time, although a box office success some critics were apparently withering towards 'Homecoming'. Agree with a few of the criticisms but disagree with most.
Maybe 'Homecoming' does become melodramatic and heavy-handed in places. Maybe LeRoy's direction is not always as tight as it could have been, a few limp stretches here and there pace-wise but will not go as far to say it was long-winded.
Clark Gable's character for me was written too fuzzily at first and Gable didn't always look comfortable and perhaps on the smug side in the early stages of the film, which is more put down to the character writing rather than him as an actor (as an actor he was great).
On the other hand, 'Homecoming' is nicely shot and evocatively designed. Mostly the script is well-meaning and thought-provoking with some genuine pathos. LeRoy's direction may not be perfect but there are more than enough signs of his competence as a director. The story is on the most part sincere and moving, the subject handled with tact, and the war-oriented scenes wrenching the gut. Nothing feels tacked on and it doesn't ever have moments that feel like they belong somewhere else.
It's the cast that come off best here, with characters mostly worth rooting for. Gable's character does become more focused the more he's developed, which allows Gable to be more comfortable and he becomes very good and easier to like. Lana Turner brings class and poignancy to a less than glamorous but sympathetic role. The relationship between her and Gable has more complexity than one thinks and purposefully doesn't rush it, it is not rich in development but the development is there and done well. The support from Anne Baxter and Gladys Cooper is sharp and that for John Hodiak sympathetic.
Altogether, decent overlooked film. 7/10 Bethany Cox
While not being completely enamoured by it, do agree with those here that like 'Homecoming' and consider it better than give credit for. Despite its faults (from respectful personal opinion), 'Homecoming' is much better than the critical reception it got at the time, although a box office success some critics were apparently withering towards 'Homecoming'. Agree with a few of the criticisms but disagree with most.
Maybe 'Homecoming' does become melodramatic and heavy-handed in places. Maybe LeRoy's direction is not always as tight as it could have been, a few limp stretches here and there pace-wise but will not go as far to say it was long-winded.
Clark Gable's character for me was written too fuzzily at first and Gable didn't always look comfortable and perhaps on the smug side in the early stages of the film, which is more put down to the character writing rather than him as an actor (as an actor he was great).
On the other hand, 'Homecoming' is nicely shot and evocatively designed. Mostly the script is well-meaning and thought-provoking with some genuine pathos. LeRoy's direction may not be perfect but there are more than enough signs of his competence as a director. The story is on the most part sincere and moving, the subject handled with tact, and the war-oriented scenes wrenching the gut. Nothing feels tacked on and it doesn't ever have moments that feel like they belong somewhere else.
It's the cast that come off best here, with characters mostly worth rooting for. Gable's character does become more focused the more he's developed, which allows Gable to be more comfortable and he becomes very good and easier to like. Lana Turner brings class and poignancy to a less than glamorous but sympathetic role. The relationship between her and Gable has more complexity than one thinks and purposefully doesn't rush it, it is not rich in development but the development is there and done well. The support from Anne Baxter and Gladys Cooper is sharp and that for John Hodiak sympathetic.
Altogether, decent overlooked film. 7/10 Bethany Cox
- TheLittleSongbird
- Dec 1, 2018
- Permalink
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Homecoming of Ulysses
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,654,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 53 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.37 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content