182 reviews
I liked the original and this one surprised me. While not every story was top notch one stands out as original and had great direction.
Tape 1-Phase 1 Clinical Trials, This was a decent Ghost Story but was not very memorable. Did have a few scares and was fun to watch.6/10
Tape 2-A Ride In The Park, This one was fun and creative. Wasn't scary but I did like the set up and actually seeing the perspective of a Zombie was real cool. It has a lot of gore and while I don't really like zombies this one was nice to watch. 7/10.
Tape 3-Safe Haven, This is the best out of the bunch. Details an investigative team going into a religious cult and the outcome is insane and over the top. Has the best pacing and while there aren't many jump scares, it really manages to creep you out the whole time through. Also it is directed by the Mo Brothers who also did the ABC's Of Death letter L which was one of the best on that horror movie and did Macabre which I will link my review to that movie in the end. 9/10
Tape 4-Alien Abduction, Most people consider this the weakest of the bunch but Tape 1 was the weakest in my opinion. This has a nice set up and the effects are good for a short. Wasn't creepy like Safe Haven but it kept me interested in till the end. 8/10
Tape 49- The main story about two private investigators watching the tapes in a house where their looking for a kid from the first VHS. It was OK and while not the best story, it did give us a reason for watching the tapes which is nice. 6/10
Overall this movie gets a 7/10. Safe Haven was great and I never knew it was by the Mo Brothers in till I watched Macabre. That was great knowing that. My link to Macabre and my review. http://imdb.com/title/tt1447791/reviews-16
Check out my review for that movie as it is my surprise of the year for 2013. If you liked the first VHS then you will like this one. I find this one to be a little better and more creative. Not sure if they will do a third one but I would be open to it.
Tape 1-Phase 1 Clinical Trials, This was a decent Ghost Story but was not very memorable. Did have a few scares and was fun to watch.6/10
Tape 2-A Ride In The Park, This one was fun and creative. Wasn't scary but I did like the set up and actually seeing the perspective of a Zombie was real cool. It has a lot of gore and while I don't really like zombies this one was nice to watch. 7/10.
Tape 3-Safe Haven, This is the best out of the bunch. Details an investigative team going into a religious cult and the outcome is insane and over the top. Has the best pacing and while there aren't many jump scares, it really manages to creep you out the whole time through. Also it is directed by the Mo Brothers who also did the ABC's Of Death letter L which was one of the best on that horror movie and did Macabre which I will link my review to that movie in the end. 9/10
Tape 4-Alien Abduction, Most people consider this the weakest of the bunch but Tape 1 was the weakest in my opinion. This has a nice set up and the effects are good for a short. Wasn't creepy like Safe Haven but it kept me interested in till the end. 8/10
Tape 49- The main story about two private investigators watching the tapes in a house where their looking for a kid from the first VHS. It was OK and while not the best story, it did give us a reason for watching the tapes which is nice. 6/10
Overall this movie gets a 7/10. Safe Haven was great and I never knew it was by the Mo Brothers in till I watched Macabre. That was great knowing that. My link to Macabre and my review. http://imdb.com/title/tt1447791/reviews-16
Check out my review for that movie as it is my surprise of the year for 2013. If you liked the first VHS then you will like this one. I find this one to be a little better and more creative. Not sure if they will do a third one but I would be open to it.
- andrewbarry6336
- Nov 24, 2013
- Permalink
V/H/S 2 is the sequal of V/H/S which is an anthology about people finding tapes, about otherworldly events. V/H/S 2 is an improvement over the first one, in basically every aspect. The stories and the events are more brutal and entertaining and some of them, are very great and absolute movie materials. The ending one is my favourite but the bicycle one with the zombies is also great. V/H/S 2 is bloody, gory and funny sometimes and it can give you chills while make you feel entertained. The whole tape thing is explained too, giving them some mystery element that there are several of them and some people just collect these. I really wanted V/H/S to be the next big thing, but the third one makes me so sad. It was really bad, compared to this.
All in all, V/H/S 2 is a great movie with great stories. I can recommend the first and the second one, but the third one is not that great.
All in all, V/H/S 2 is a great movie with great stories. I can recommend the first and the second one, but the third one is not that great.
- FunkyBoi32
- May 28, 2019
- Permalink
I believe V/H/S built high expectations for the next movies. Seems like V/H/S/2 let some of us down...
If you are a gore fan, this movie is good for you.
If you are an alien, zombie fan, this movie is good for you.
What I found rather terrible is the agressive shaking of the camera, which really makes the phrase "More is not better" true. It gave me a headache trying to figure out some scenes.
Certainly V/H/S/2 is more gore-y visually than V/H/S and uses a variety of themes. But this movie was very generic with it's themes. My favorite one had to be the one with the cult, it seemed much more uncommon.
Now, I am not saying that this is a time-wasting movie..Not an remarkable one though, either. I expect more from the next movies.
If you are a gore fan, this movie is good for you.
If you are an alien, zombie fan, this movie is good for you.
What I found rather terrible is the agressive shaking of the camera, which really makes the phrase "More is not better" true. It gave me a headache trying to figure out some scenes.
Certainly V/H/S/2 is more gore-y visually than V/H/S and uses a variety of themes. But this movie was very generic with it's themes. My favorite one had to be the one with the cult, it seemed much more uncommon.
Now, I am not saying that this is a time-wasting movie..Not an remarkable one though, either. I expect more from the next movies.
- alexandra_eyes
- Apr 5, 2023
- Permalink
V/H/S/2 (2013)
*** (out of 4)
Gory sequel to the 2012 film has a pair of investigators breaking into an apartment where they find an assortment of videotapes. The first story involves a man who receives a mechanical eye transplant that soon allows him to see dead people. The second story has a biker with a camera on his helmet getting bit by a zombie and soon he turns into one. The third story takes place at a strange cult school where the leader is being interviewed when "it" happens. The fourth and final story deals with a group of boys who keep playing a prank on one's sister when something joins them. I enjoyed the first film in the series and this one here is actually a tad bit stronger thanks in large part to the first two stories. The majority of the camera work comes from the camera being placed on people head's and I must admit that this gave me a headache at times but I will give the filmmakers credit as this did allow some familiar stories to be told in new ways. This is especially true for the second story when we get the POV shots from the zombie as he goes searching for people to eat. This was a rather unique spin on the genre and it really worked. The first story was also quite good, although this mechanical eye thing left some logical issues. Still, the episode is a good one and features some nice ideas. The fourth episode is one I won't ruin but there's a nice little twist along the way and I think it manages to be quite ambitious. The third film is without question the weakest but it does contain some very twisted scenes and a high level of gore. V/H/S/2 has the same look of the first film as the quality is quite different from one story to the next but this gives the film its own unique feel. Fans of gore will also enjoy that there's plenty of that going on here and especially in the third story, which is a downright bloodbath and even the second one contains a lot of the red stuff. For the most part the performances were just fine and at 95-minutes the film goes by fairly quickly. V/H/S/2 is a nice little gem that has a few flaws but for the most part it works well and I look forward to future installments.
*** (out of 4)
Gory sequel to the 2012 film has a pair of investigators breaking into an apartment where they find an assortment of videotapes. The first story involves a man who receives a mechanical eye transplant that soon allows him to see dead people. The second story has a biker with a camera on his helmet getting bit by a zombie and soon he turns into one. The third story takes place at a strange cult school where the leader is being interviewed when "it" happens. The fourth and final story deals with a group of boys who keep playing a prank on one's sister when something joins them. I enjoyed the first film in the series and this one here is actually a tad bit stronger thanks in large part to the first two stories. The majority of the camera work comes from the camera being placed on people head's and I must admit that this gave me a headache at times but I will give the filmmakers credit as this did allow some familiar stories to be told in new ways. This is especially true for the second story when we get the POV shots from the zombie as he goes searching for people to eat. This was a rather unique spin on the genre and it really worked. The first story was also quite good, although this mechanical eye thing left some logical issues. Still, the episode is a good one and features some nice ideas. The fourth episode is one I won't ruin but there's a nice little twist along the way and I think it manages to be quite ambitious. The third film is without question the weakest but it does contain some very twisted scenes and a high level of gore. V/H/S/2 has the same look of the first film as the quality is quite different from one story to the next but this gives the film its own unique feel. Fans of gore will also enjoy that there's plenty of that going on here and especially in the third story, which is a downright bloodbath and even the second one contains a lot of the red stuff. For the most part the performances were just fine and at 95-minutes the film goes by fairly quickly. V/H/S/2 is a nice little gem that has a few flaws but for the most part it works well and I look forward to future installments.
- Michael_Elliott
- Oct 26, 2013
- Permalink
- bosimmons-70376
- Oct 10, 2021
- Permalink
V/H/S 2 manages to fix the faults of the first. It's shorter and takes the grungy, exploitative snuff film tone of V/H/S and adds more excitement and humor. The quality of the shorts this time around are much more consistent, but they are still a mixed bag. The first short "Phase I: Clinical Trials" is average at best, but it mixed in a bit of humor which I liked. "A Ride in the Park" was fantastic and incredibly unique in it's use of the first person POV. It was my favorite of the four segments. "Safe Haven" is a close second with countless WTF moments. I would have loved a feature length version of this one. The weakest entry was the last, "Slumber Party Alien Abduction". It ineffectively used loud noises and bright lights to generate scares and it just didn't work for me. The wrap around story "Tape 49" was good, but I liked the ambiguity of the first films "Tape 56" better. V/H/S 2 added fun to the series and I hope these films continue.
Wow, what a contrast this film is with the first one! Most found-footage films I've seen have always had me wondering why the hell the people in the films are bothering to carry video cameras around and record the events that are unfolding around them as they run for their lives, this one is different, every use of a camera has been cleverly thought out and explained, from a camera mounted on a mountain bikers helmet to a documentary crew with button cameras, and even a bionic prosthetic eye, the intelligence that the film makers put it into this has made this into one of the best ff films I've had the pleasure of watching.
In comparison to the first V/H/S film I thought this one was a whole lot more mature, the stories were more believable and well written, the excellent sequence from a zombies perspective was hilarious and gory and by far my favourite, I'm not sure if it was meant to be funny, but if it was it worked brilliantly.
In V/H/S 1 there wasn't much said about the video tapes, only that they were found, someone wanted them and that they contained some pretty freaky stuff, this time I think the film makers have realised that they could have a gold mine hiding within the urban legend of the tapes, and have started to play on this legend a little more, and I think if they continue down the path they have ahead of them, expanding on the legend, keeping the intelligent use of cameras and smart reasons behind the tapes discovery for each film, then they could have a franchise as successful as the Saw franchise.
Here's hoping! More reviews at http://stuarthine.worpress.com
In comparison to the first V/H/S film I thought this one was a whole lot more mature, the stories were more believable and well written, the excellent sequence from a zombies perspective was hilarious and gory and by far my favourite, I'm not sure if it was meant to be funny, but if it was it worked brilliantly.
In V/H/S 1 there wasn't much said about the video tapes, only that they were found, someone wanted them and that they contained some pretty freaky stuff, this time I think the film makers have realised that they could have a gold mine hiding within the urban legend of the tapes, and have started to play on this legend a little more, and I think if they continue down the path they have ahead of them, expanding on the legend, keeping the intelligent use of cameras and smart reasons behind the tapes discovery for each film, then they could have a franchise as successful as the Saw franchise.
Here's hoping! More reviews at http://stuarthine.worpress.com
- Mr_Shine74
- Jun 20, 2013
- Permalink
Number of scares in this movie...zero.
Now that's not a particularly good number for a horror movie. It's just the same old crap rolled out again and again, now you see me now you don't kind of thing. Oh what's lurking in the corner....nothing fun, exciting, scary or interesting, that's what.
It does have a couple of funny moments, Satan's unicorn being one of them, but these moments are spread way to thin to make this movie anything more than a dud.
There are tons of found footage movies, some of the pretty good others are called VHS 2...do yourself a favour...make your own crappy movie and watch that instead, at least you will have fun doing it :)
Now that's not a particularly good number for a horror movie. It's just the same old crap rolled out again and again, now you see me now you don't kind of thing. Oh what's lurking in the corner....nothing fun, exciting, scary or interesting, that's what.
It does have a couple of funny moments, Satan's unicorn being one of them, but these moments are spread way to thin to make this movie anything more than a dud.
There are tons of found footage movies, some of the pretty good others are called VHS 2...do yourself a favour...make your own crappy movie and watch that instead, at least you will have fun doing it :)
- damianphelps
- Dec 2, 2022
- Permalink
~I want to start off by saying that V/H/S 2 is a huge step up from its predecessor. It delivers more chills, thrills, action, and what we enjoy most...FUN! I was completely thrown off when I first watched this movie. I didn't know it was going to be so insane. ~For the people who haven't seen the first V/H/S, basically the movies are about a bunch of 'found-footage' short horror stories played through VHS tapes by people in a house. While they are watching these VHS tapes, something spooky is also going on in the house as well that stretches through the whole movie giving you updates on what's happening in the between changing of tapes. Now let's get to the tapes which is the main focus of this film. I won't give super spoilers, but i'll just give brief description of each tape.
TAPE 1 - "Phase 1 Clinical Trials" This ghost story tape is the only one that made me jump a bunch of times. It will be the jump scare tape and that's what it heavily focuses on in scaring you. I enjoyed it for it's jump scares, but there is a questionable scene in there that doesn't make any sense, but luckily, I, a horror movie fanatic, knows that you aren't suppose to take horror movies that seriously or think SUPER deep about it. This one gets a... 8/10 (generous)
TAPE 2 - "A Ride in the Park" Ever wanted to see through the eyes of a zombie? Well this is your lucky short. This is a pretty cool zombie short. It could have been just a little bit better, but it is still pretty good thanks to a few awesome scenes in it. This one gets a... 7/10
TAPE 3 - "Safe Haven" This insane short is definitely the best out of the bunch. It is completely insane, bizarre, violent, and fun at the same time. Easily the most craziest, but enjoyable short I have ever experienced. If you see this film, make sure you watch this tape. It's long, but the crazy ending is worth it. This one gets a... 9.5/10
TAPE 4 - "Slumber Party Alien Abduction" Well, the title of the tape speaks for itself. This short gets pretty fun and intense, but the most noticeable aspect about this tape, is the unique way that it's filmed. The camera is actually attached to the back of a dog, so we see what the dog sees and I had to give a big thumbs up for that. It's pretty creative and actually works out well enough. This tape will have you wondering what the f**k is going on but keep you thoroughly entertained. This one gets a... 8/10
Wrap Around Tape/Frame Narrative - "Tape 49" As I said before, this is the story that plays on while the tapes are being watched. Two private investigators are searching for a missing college boy. They break into his house, search for him a little, then start to watch the tapes (which are the horror shorts) that he has. This story had a pretty clever twist in it that leads up to it's ending (which ends the whole film). This one gets a... 7/10
OVERALL - 8/10. It's fun, has some scares, is over-the-top violent and insane, and a lot better than the first one. V/H/S 1 fans will LOVE V/H/S 2 and horror fans will love this as well.
TAPE 1 - "Phase 1 Clinical Trials" This ghost story tape is the only one that made me jump a bunch of times. It will be the jump scare tape and that's what it heavily focuses on in scaring you. I enjoyed it for it's jump scares, but there is a questionable scene in there that doesn't make any sense, but luckily, I, a horror movie fanatic, knows that you aren't suppose to take horror movies that seriously or think SUPER deep about it. This one gets a... 8/10 (generous)
TAPE 2 - "A Ride in the Park" Ever wanted to see through the eyes of a zombie? Well this is your lucky short. This is a pretty cool zombie short. It could have been just a little bit better, but it is still pretty good thanks to a few awesome scenes in it. This one gets a... 7/10
TAPE 3 - "Safe Haven" This insane short is definitely the best out of the bunch. It is completely insane, bizarre, violent, and fun at the same time. Easily the most craziest, but enjoyable short I have ever experienced. If you see this film, make sure you watch this tape. It's long, but the crazy ending is worth it. This one gets a... 9.5/10
TAPE 4 - "Slumber Party Alien Abduction" Well, the title of the tape speaks for itself. This short gets pretty fun and intense, but the most noticeable aspect about this tape, is the unique way that it's filmed. The camera is actually attached to the back of a dog, so we see what the dog sees and I had to give a big thumbs up for that. It's pretty creative and actually works out well enough. This tape will have you wondering what the f**k is going on but keep you thoroughly entertained. This one gets a... 8/10
Wrap Around Tape/Frame Narrative - "Tape 49" As I said before, this is the story that plays on while the tapes are being watched. Two private investigators are searching for a missing college boy. They break into his house, search for him a little, then start to watch the tapes (which are the horror shorts) that he has. This story had a pretty clever twist in it that leads up to it's ending (which ends the whole film). This one gets a... 7/10
OVERALL - 8/10. It's fun, has some scares, is over-the-top violent and insane, and a lot better than the first one. V/H/S 1 fans will LOVE V/H/S 2 and horror fans will love this as well.
V/H/S/ 2 is a modern-day horror anthology featuring eclectic talent from the directors of THE RAID and YOU'RE NEXT amongst others. As with many modern horror anthologies, the emphasis is on outright blood and gore over scares, although there are attempts here to frighten as well as repulse the viewer. There are four tales in all, as well as a mildly diverting wraparound story involving a creepy old house and a VHS collection. Most of the material is shot POV style, which I enjoyed as a fan of the 'found footage' genre.
The first tale is a simple riff on THE EYE, as a guy gets a new-fangled optic implant that restores his sight but has the unwanted side effect of allowing him to see spirits at the same time. I love the introduction of the deaf girl with her own twist and this is by far the scariest of the film, with some really jumpy moments. It's all predictable, but that's okay.
The second tale is about a cyclist with a Go Pro camera mounted on his helmet. His trip through the woods is interrupted by a zombie attack, and what we get here is unending gore and bloodshed, some of the most gruesome you'll see. It's all pretty distasteful actually, and more than a little pointless.
The third story is the Indonesian one, contributed by THE RAID director Gareth Evans; as a huge fan of his films, it was the one I was most looking forward to. Evans doesn't disappoint; this is as intense as his action films, and the madcap plot line involves a doomsday cult and the birth of the Antichrist. It's exceptionally gory, delightfully obscure, and without a doubt the highlight of the whole thing.
The fourth and final story is weak by comparison. It tells of an attack by extraterrestrials on a group of redneck characters, who are all really dumb, but there's way too much of the shaky cam here and little real meat to the storyline. The dog is the most interesting character and you can guess what happens to that. V/H/S/ 2 isn't bad at all for fans of gory horror, but aside from the Indonesian segment it's all rather familiar.
The first tale is a simple riff on THE EYE, as a guy gets a new-fangled optic implant that restores his sight but has the unwanted side effect of allowing him to see spirits at the same time. I love the introduction of the deaf girl with her own twist and this is by far the scariest of the film, with some really jumpy moments. It's all predictable, but that's okay.
The second tale is about a cyclist with a Go Pro camera mounted on his helmet. His trip through the woods is interrupted by a zombie attack, and what we get here is unending gore and bloodshed, some of the most gruesome you'll see. It's all pretty distasteful actually, and more than a little pointless.
The third story is the Indonesian one, contributed by THE RAID director Gareth Evans; as a huge fan of his films, it was the one I was most looking forward to. Evans doesn't disappoint; this is as intense as his action films, and the madcap plot line involves a doomsday cult and the birth of the Antichrist. It's exceptionally gory, delightfully obscure, and without a doubt the highlight of the whole thing.
The fourth and final story is weak by comparison. It tells of an attack by extraterrestrials on a group of redneck characters, who are all really dumb, but there's way too much of the shaky cam here and little real meat to the storyline. The dog is the most interesting character and you can guess what happens to that. V/H/S/ 2 isn't bad at all for fans of gory horror, but aside from the Indonesian segment it's all rather familiar.
- Leofwine_draca
- Sep 20, 2015
- Permalink
V/H/S/2 is like the droves of other sequels that are forced and totally manufactured. In other words, they doctored up some daft reason for a part 2 to occur and made a movie.
V/H/S/2 actually happens at the venue of the first installment. This time two private eye types whose job it is to find and/or film people are looking for a lady's lost son. The male counterpart to this dumb duo says that the boy is at a particular house. I guess breaking and entering is a part of their job description because that's exactly what they do. "Oh, and since we're here, let's watch some of these unlabeled video tapes."
Yes, that's how it happened. Most people that break into any place want to get in and out as quickly as possible, especially since they're committing a crime. This terrible tandem did everything but buy soda and popcorn.
As for the videos: they lacked imagination as well. Plenty of gore (if I said gratuitous violence that would be putting it mildly), supernatural stuff, and some unexplained nudity. That's what I made of it all. Ultimately, it was a chance to mint money based upon the first movie.
V/H/S/2 actually happens at the venue of the first installment. This time two private eye types whose job it is to find and/or film people are looking for a lady's lost son. The male counterpart to this dumb duo says that the boy is at a particular house. I guess breaking and entering is a part of their job description because that's exactly what they do. "Oh, and since we're here, let's watch some of these unlabeled video tapes."
Yes, that's how it happened. Most people that break into any place want to get in and out as quickly as possible, especially since they're committing a crime. This terrible tandem did everything but buy soda and popcorn.
As for the videos: they lacked imagination as well. Plenty of gore (if I said gratuitous violence that would be putting it mildly), supernatural stuff, and some unexplained nudity. That's what I made of it all. Ultimately, it was a chance to mint money based upon the first movie.
- view_and_review
- Jan 1, 2016
- Permalink
- moviewizguy
- Mar 14, 2013
- Permalink
Like most anthologies I've seen, except for maybe Three
Extremes (2004) that is consistently good, these types of works tend to be pretty uneven. V/H/S/2 is no exception. Much like the first V/H/S (2012) the sequel features a rather basic "frame narrative", which involves people finding the infamous VHS tapes and playing them for us, the audience. Unlike the first film, the narrative here only gets interesting towards the conclusion, but ultimately ends up feeling rushed and a bit forced. The found footage angle is pretty much used in the same way, while inventing some new justifications for why there is a camera taping everything at all times.
The first short titled Clinical Trials is about a young man that gets an artificial eye implanted after having an accident. The new eye seems to be seeing more than he bargained for. Scary and intense, this first short directed by Adam Wingard is a good way to kick off the anthology.
Next up is A Ride in the Park directed by the guys that brought you The Blair Witch Project (1999). This short is about a guy getting attacked by zombies while riding his bike in the park. There's nothing special about this short. It feels uninspired and by the numbers. It's nothing you haven't seen before and the ending is as unimaginative and standard as you'd expect. For a brief moment there's a glimmer of hope the filmmakers might take a certain interesting direction, exploring if there's any humanity left in zombie, but sadly that never happens.
Moving on to my favorite short of the anthology, and what makes V/H/S/2 worth watching, is Safe Haven the segment directed by Timo Tjahjanto. The Indonesian director is surely one of the most interesting new voices working in horror today. Timo's tribute here is a story about a group of filmmakers trying to expose a crazy Indonesian cult leader. After agreeing to be interviewed in his lair the crew is lured inside what has to be the nuttiest place on earth. What happens is so insane and jarring you won't believe it's actually happening. If you don't try to make sense of it and just accept it, you'll have a good time. I highly recommend Timo's breakout debut feature Darah (2009) and his genius L is for Libido segment in The ABCs of Death (2012).
The last short, before concluding the mostly uninteresting frame narrative, is Slumber Party Alien Abduction directed by Jason Eisner from Hobo with a Shotgun (2011) fame. Basically the title perfectly resumes the story: Teenage kids get abducted by aliens. What the title doesn't tell you is how annoying these teenage kids are and how you want them to die, and not survive. The aliens, traditional Roswell Greys, fail to be scary. So does the loud and distracting sound design. Overall probably the worst segment of the lot, but maybe that's just because it comes right after the best.
All in all V/H/S/2 is better than V/H/S in that it tries to go for scares instead of "fun". The third short clearly stands out as the best, but for a die-hard found footage fanatic like myself there's some enjoyment and entertainment value in every short. It's also better than the first V/H/S, because there's less, but longer segments which allows for the story to be more fully developed. Presenting four different sub-genres is a smart move: The film is never repetitive and there's a little something to be appreciated for everyone.
The first short titled Clinical Trials is about a young man that gets an artificial eye implanted after having an accident. The new eye seems to be seeing more than he bargained for. Scary and intense, this first short directed by Adam Wingard is a good way to kick off the anthology.
Next up is A Ride in the Park directed by the guys that brought you The Blair Witch Project (1999). This short is about a guy getting attacked by zombies while riding his bike in the park. There's nothing special about this short. It feels uninspired and by the numbers. It's nothing you haven't seen before and the ending is as unimaginative and standard as you'd expect. For a brief moment there's a glimmer of hope the filmmakers might take a certain interesting direction, exploring if there's any humanity left in zombie, but sadly that never happens.
Moving on to my favorite short of the anthology, and what makes V/H/S/2 worth watching, is Safe Haven the segment directed by Timo Tjahjanto. The Indonesian director is surely one of the most interesting new voices working in horror today. Timo's tribute here is a story about a group of filmmakers trying to expose a crazy Indonesian cult leader. After agreeing to be interviewed in his lair the crew is lured inside what has to be the nuttiest place on earth. What happens is so insane and jarring you won't believe it's actually happening. If you don't try to make sense of it and just accept it, you'll have a good time. I highly recommend Timo's breakout debut feature Darah (2009) and his genius L is for Libido segment in The ABCs of Death (2012).
The last short, before concluding the mostly uninteresting frame narrative, is Slumber Party Alien Abduction directed by Jason Eisner from Hobo with a Shotgun (2011) fame. Basically the title perfectly resumes the story: Teenage kids get abducted by aliens. What the title doesn't tell you is how annoying these teenage kids are and how you want them to die, and not survive. The aliens, traditional Roswell Greys, fail to be scary. So does the loud and distracting sound design. Overall probably the worst segment of the lot, but maybe that's just because it comes right after the best.
All in all V/H/S/2 is better than V/H/S in that it tries to go for scares instead of "fun". The third short clearly stands out as the best, but for a die-hard found footage fanatic like myself there's some enjoyment and entertainment value in every short. It's also better than the first V/H/S, because there's less, but longer segments which allows for the story to be more fully developed. Presenting four different sub-genres is a smart move: The film is never repetitive and there's a little something to be appreciated for everyone.
- TheDelusionist
- Jun 8, 2013
- Permalink
- DakedoJones
- Jun 7, 2013
- Permalink
There is one amazing segment of VHS 2 that has to do with a Cult. It is frenetic, gory, has a great story and makes the most of the "found footage" format. If the rest of the film had lived up to this one sequence, we would have had something special. It's better than Part One in most aspects, though I did like a few moments in that film.
Timo Tjahjanto really blew me away - his segment is imaginative and has some real shocks crammed into it's short running time. Some of the camera work is a bit too shaky as people run around, but I was able to get around that due to the intensity of the story. Out of the remaining short films, we get a return to full on Shaky Cam with Edwardo Sanchez (Blair Witch Project). Truthfully, Edwardo has ALWAYS got to shake the camera like he's in a runaway car or something. He seems to think this is a STYLE. I must argue the point. True artists do not need to shake a camera like a fool to get an image to move someone. Argento, Carpenter, Bava. Masters of the art. Dean Cundy would never run around like a fool, shaking his camera at every object he can find, disregarding the basic rules of directing at will, and no real professional should allow camera-work like this. What an artistic stretch for Edwardo. Next time just throw the damned thing on the ground and drag it around with a rope.
There are a few other sparks. Jason Eisener makes the most of his segment by having some real fun with it and throwing in an Alien Invasion that is both scary and funny. And I really enjoyed the basic idea and most of the execution of Adam Wingard's segment. Still, too damned much shaking here.
I am not sure I understand it really - why so much shaking in these "Found Footage" atrocities? I mean, the old camcorder videos that my family made at Holidays and on Vacation never looked like this. Grandpa tried to keep the camera still. I never actually have seen a home movie like these. Not even on old Super 8. Have you? Eyestrain central. For part 3, maybe they can just go to an old amusement park and give us a POV of the rides or jump out of a plane while filming. At least there'll be a legitimate reason for it being so damned shaky. I think I'd rather watch "HI-8" again.
Timo Tjahjanto really blew me away - his segment is imaginative and has some real shocks crammed into it's short running time. Some of the camera work is a bit too shaky as people run around, but I was able to get around that due to the intensity of the story. Out of the remaining short films, we get a return to full on Shaky Cam with Edwardo Sanchez (Blair Witch Project). Truthfully, Edwardo has ALWAYS got to shake the camera like he's in a runaway car or something. He seems to think this is a STYLE. I must argue the point. True artists do not need to shake a camera like a fool to get an image to move someone. Argento, Carpenter, Bava. Masters of the art. Dean Cundy would never run around like a fool, shaking his camera at every object he can find, disregarding the basic rules of directing at will, and no real professional should allow camera-work like this. What an artistic stretch for Edwardo. Next time just throw the damned thing on the ground and drag it around with a rope.
There are a few other sparks. Jason Eisener makes the most of his segment by having some real fun with it and throwing in an Alien Invasion that is both scary and funny. And I really enjoyed the basic idea and most of the execution of Adam Wingard's segment. Still, too damned much shaking here.
I am not sure I understand it really - why so much shaking in these "Found Footage" atrocities? I mean, the old camcorder videos that my family made at Holidays and on Vacation never looked like this. Grandpa tried to keep the camera still. I never actually have seen a home movie like these. Not even on old Super 8. Have you? Eyestrain central. For part 3, maybe they can just go to an old amusement park and give us a POV of the rides or jump out of a plane while filming. At least there'll be a legitimate reason for it being so damned shaky. I think I'd rather watch "HI-8" again.
- MayhemPaul
- Jan 1, 2014
- Permalink
Private investigators Larry (Lawrence Michael Levine) and Ayesha (Kelsy Abbott) take on the case of investigating the disappearance of college student Kyle (L. C. Holt) and upon entering Kyle's home find a collection of VHS tapes with instances of supernatural occurrence.
After the first V/H/S film proved to be a modest hit, the producers rushed a sequel into production not long after its release. Featuring a return of Adam Wingard and Simon Barrett as well as a bevy of new creatives for the rest of the segments, V/H/S/2 irons out most of the rough spots even if carries over a few.
Tape 49 serves as our wraparound segment which is written and directed by Simon Barrett. Larry and Ayesh are way more likable characters than the thieves from the prior film (even if they dabble in morally questionable activities) and their function in taking us through the story holds a lot more stakes even if it's not altogether clear why they tie together with the segments.
Adam Wingard directs and stars in the first segment Phase I Clinical Trials written by Simon Barrett. Featuring the story of a man who lost his eye, Herman (Wingard), who's given an artificial eye by company KPG with the caveat they'll record its feed for research, what seems like a medical miracle soon turns terrifying as Herman begins seeing ghosts with the eye. It's a very conventional story with a man slowly losing his mind to supernatural occurrence before succumbing to them, but it's well done with a nice punch to the scare sequences.
Blair Witch Project alums Eduardo Sanchez and Gregg Hale co-direct A Ride in the Park from a script by Jamie Nash which follows a bicyclist (Jay Saunders) in the woods who is bitten by a zombie and becomes one and thanks to his GoPro helmet we follow a zombie attack from the POV of the zombie. It's a very basic zombie setup, but the Sanchez and Hale do play with the concept of following it from the POV of the zombies and exploring how much humanity remains once they turn into flesh eating ghouls. A simple concept but extremely well executed.
Timo Tjahjanto and Gareth Evans write and direct Safe Haven which follows a documentary crew interviewing a cult led by the enigmatic Father (Epy Kusnandar) which initially seems like an Indonesian Jonestown only for the cult's theology to reveal itself in terrifying ways. This is definitely the most brutal of the segments and features a lot of the same gritty and high impact style Tjahjanto and Evans have brought to their other projects and the carnage depicted both during the buildup and eventual reveal is truly something to behold.
The final segment Slumber Party Alien Abduction directed by Jason Eisener and written by John Davies & Eisener follows a group of siblings, their dog, and their friends engaging in various hijinks when aliens arrive and abduct them. This is probably the weakest of the shorts as the aliens are very standard and not all that interesting but it is well acted even if the material isn't all that interesting.
V/H/S/2 is a marked improvement from its predecessor especially thanks to a shorter runtime and less abrasive leads in the wraparound segment. The reason why this stuff is even on VHS still stains credibility and unlike its predecessor it ends on the weakest short (I personally would've ended on Safe Haven) but it's a solid enough collection of shorts from skilled teams.
After the first V/H/S film proved to be a modest hit, the producers rushed a sequel into production not long after its release. Featuring a return of Adam Wingard and Simon Barrett as well as a bevy of new creatives for the rest of the segments, V/H/S/2 irons out most of the rough spots even if carries over a few.
Tape 49 serves as our wraparound segment which is written and directed by Simon Barrett. Larry and Ayesh are way more likable characters than the thieves from the prior film (even if they dabble in morally questionable activities) and their function in taking us through the story holds a lot more stakes even if it's not altogether clear why they tie together with the segments.
Adam Wingard directs and stars in the first segment Phase I Clinical Trials written by Simon Barrett. Featuring the story of a man who lost his eye, Herman (Wingard), who's given an artificial eye by company KPG with the caveat they'll record its feed for research, what seems like a medical miracle soon turns terrifying as Herman begins seeing ghosts with the eye. It's a very conventional story with a man slowly losing his mind to supernatural occurrence before succumbing to them, but it's well done with a nice punch to the scare sequences.
Blair Witch Project alums Eduardo Sanchez and Gregg Hale co-direct A Ride in the Park from a script by Jamie Nash which follows a bicyclist (Jay Saunders) in the woods who is bitten by a zombie and becomes one and thanks to his GoPro helmet we follow a zombie attack from the POV of the zombie. It's a very basic zombie setup, but the Sanchez and Hale do play with the concept of following it from the POV of the zombies and exploring how much humanity remains once they turn into flesh eating ghouls. A simple concept but extremely well executed.
Timo Tjahjanto and Gareth Evans write and direct Safe Haven which follows a documentary crew interviewing a cult led by the enigmatic Father (Epy Kusnandar) which initially seems like an Indonesian Jonestown only for the cult's theology to reveal itself in terrifying ways. This is definitely the most brutal of the segments and features a lot of the same gritty and high impact style Tjahjanto and Evans have brought to their other projects and the carnage depicted both during the buildup and eventual reveal is truly something to behold.
The final segment Slumber Party Alien Abduction directed by Jason Eisener and written by John Davies & Eisener follows a group of siblings, their dog, and their friends engaging in various hijinks when aliens arrive and abduct them. This is probably the weakest of the shorts as the aliens are very standard and not all that interesting but it is well acted even if the material isn't all that interesting.
V/H/S/2 is a marked improvement from its predecessor especially thanks to a shorter runtime and less abrasive leads in the wraparound segment. The reason why this stuff is even on VHS still stains credibility and unlike its predecessor it ends on the weakest short (I personally would've ended on Safe Haven) but it's a solid enough collection of shorts from skilled teams.
- IonicBreezeMachine
- Oct 4, 2024
- Permalink
I decided to rewatch "V/H/S/2" to introduce this series to my brother. The film takes a dark approach, almost resembling a snuff movie, but always rewards us with creative twists that pay homage to various elements of horror cinema.
The film presents four short films directed by notable names in the genre, such as Simon Barrett, Adam Wingard, Eduardo Sánchez, and Gregg Hale (the creators of "Blair Witch Project"), Gareth Evans, and Timo Tjahjanto.
The movie begins with "Phase I Clinical Trials," which might be the weakest of the anthology. The premise involves a man who, after receiving an ocular implant, starts seeing spirits. However, the execution falls short. The concept is intriguing, but the short is hampered by a lack of tension, as well as makeup and cinematography that fail to create the necessary atmosphere for effective horror.
Moving on to "A Ride in the Park," we see a more creative and fresh take on the zombie subgenre. The idea of seeing the world through the eyes of a zombie is an interesting twist, especially in the context of found footage. This short stands out for its originality, offering a new perspective by showing things from the villain's point of view. Unlike the generic "In A Violent Nature," which used the same formula, this entry brought something new, keeping the viewer engaged and intrigued. It's an example of how a simple idea can be turned into something good when done right.
"Safe Haven" is, without a doubt, the highlight of "V/H/S/2." This short film, focused on a bizarre and terrifying cult, perfectly captures the essence of psychological and supernatural horror. The tension is palpable, and the narrative takes the viewer on an emotional rollercoaster, culminating in a shocking ending. The cinematography, atmosphere, and performances are exceptional, creating a very bizarre mood. This segment deserves to be expanded into a full-length feature.
The final short, "Slumber Party Alien Abduction," closes the anthology with an interesting take on alien invasion. While not the most impactful, it still manages to entertain and surprise. I recommend watching it with the volume up to enhance the sensory experience.
In summary, "V/H/S/2" is an anthology that, even though it doesn't fully capture the surprise of my first viewing, still offers moments of pure horror and creativity. It's an experience that, despite its imperfections, is worth revisiting-especially for those looking for something different in the horror genre.
The film presents four short films directed by notable names in the genre, such as Simon Barrett, Adam Wingard, Eduardo Sánchez, and Gregg Hale (the creators of "Blair Witch Project"), Gareth Evans, and Timo Tjahjanto.
The movie begins with "Phase I Clinical Trials," which might be the weakest of the anthology. The premise involves a man who, after receiving an ocular implant, starts seeing spirits. However, the execution falls short. The concept is intriguing, but the short is hampered by a lack of tension, as well as makeup and cinematography that fail to create the necessary atmosphere for effective horror.
Moving on to "A Ride in the Park," we see a more creative and fresh take on the zombie subgenre. The idea of seeing the world through the eyes of a zombie is an interesting twist, especially in the context of found footage. This short stands out for its originality, offering a new perspective by showing things from the villain's point of view. Unlike the generic "In A Violent Nature," which used the same formula, this entry brought something new, keeping the viewer engaged and intrigued. It's an example of how a simple idea can be turned into something good when done right.
"Safe Haven" is, without a doubt, the highlight of "V/H/S/2." This short film, focused on a bizarre and terrifying cult, perfectly captures the essence of psychological and supernatural horror. The tension is palpable, and the narrative takes the viewer on an emotional rollercoaster, culminating in a shocking ending. The cinematography, atmosphere, and performances are exceptional, creating a very bizarre mood. This segment deserves to be expanded into a full-length feature.
The final short, "Slumber Party Alien Abduction," closes the anthology with an interesting take on alien invasion. While not the most impactful, it still manages to entertain and surprise. I recommend watching it with the volume up to enhance the sensory experience.
In summary, "V/H/S/2" is an anthology that, even though it doesn't fully capture the surprise of my first viewing, still offers moments of pure horror and creativity. It's an experience that, despite its imperfections, is worth revisiting-especially for those looking for something different in the horror genre.
- pedroquintaoo
- Aug 16, 2024
- Permalink
The first "V/H/S" is a good found footage horror anthology film that I personally enjoyed for the most part anyways. Despite few of the stories seemed a bit flat despite the other ones really nailing it. And like the first one this one has more of the cool camera tricks going for it. And it actually adds to the cool vibe to this film. For a low budget horror anthology film such as this one it could have even worked as a TV show like "Tales from the Crypt". But personally I thought it worked well in film form and actually made me look forward to the next installment. I mean it's not a great horror found footage horror anthology film out there or horror films in general. But it's entertaining and even amusing at times because of the clever camera work. The first "V/H/S" film had few really flat ones when it came to few of the stories found in the tapes. That isn't really the case with this one, basically all of it held my interest despite few being weaker than the other which is completely understandable. And the special effects are better this time around as well. But it just didn't feel all that raw compared to the first one and the rawness added to the originality that went away from the Hollywood movies. And some parts of this movie just didn't make any sense and I am not talking about the supernatural and other creepy elements. Despite few flaws this is a film that is most definitely worth a rent for horror fans.
6.8/10
6.8/10
- KineticSeoul
- Jun 20, 2013
- Permalink
- godzillatokyos-o-s
- Feb 15, 2013
- Permalink
I'm just so disappointed! I absolutely loved V/H/S and it was not long after my seeing it that I learned that there was going to be a V/H/S 2. Needless to say I was excited and eager to see it, and well, today was the first time I'd had the opportunity to finally see part 2. I'd read all the many great, rave reviews which only furthered my excitement of seeing it. I'd also seen and read a few negative reviews that were varied in their reasons for not liking part 2, and for the most part I noted that it seemed to be coming from people who generally did not like the original. This led me to believe that they were simply not fans of this particular type of horror(as seen in VHS), rather than my taking it as any type indicator of the movie not being "good".
I obviously was quite psyched to finally get to see it today and my belief was at BEST it would be a bigger/better version of the original, and at the very LEAST it would be equal to the original, with similar, but different story lines.
Boy, how wrong was I in it not even being comparable to the original. In fact so drastically different(and not in a good/positive way) I would never have dreamed that this was even a "V/H/S" film coming to us from people involved in its predecessor.
It's the first time in a very long, long time that I have actually felt so disappointed, and let down over a movie. I obviously should have given more weight, and thought, to those who'd expressed such dislike for this sequel film, but I believe what's most confusing to me is that so many of the huge fans of the original, like myself, have given this sequel such rave reviews, heralding it as even better than the first, and outdoing the original.
No, fans, I am sorry to say but this sequel is not any of the above described in those rave reviews, but rather is of poor quality, quantity, and altogether unrecognizable as even being in the same category as its predecessor...And I hate having to say that because I am NOT one who bashes horror movies, or are overly harsh in my critiquing them. I'm a die hard horror fan and I love even some of the most lower-alphabet-grade of horror flicks! I give them praise and point out all the great about each/all of them. So, for me to have this opinion on this sequel is not only surprising to me, but is just a great disappointment all around where this movie's concerned.
I suppose this was bound to happen, but I certainly never thought it'd have been a "V/H/S" film that was to be the flick to deliver me such disappointment! I say skip it, and instead go watch the original, V/H/S, because without a doubt it delivers on every single level a horror movie should, and it does so in repeated viewings, and not just a single, one-time, first viewing type of way.
I obviously was quite psyched to finally get to see it today and my belief was at BEST it would be a bigger/better version of the original, and at the very LEAST it would be equal to the original, with similar, but different story lines.
Boy, how wrong was I in it not even being comparable to the original. In fact so drastically different(and not in a good/positive way) I would never have dreamed that this was even a "V/H/S" film coming to us from people involved in its predecessor.
It's the first time in a very long, long time that I have actually felt so disappointed, and let down over a movie. I obviously should have given more weight, and thought, to those who'd expressed such dislike for this sequel film, but I believe what's most confusing to me is that so many of the huge fans of the original, like myself, have given this sequel such rave reviews, heralding it as even better than the first, and outdoing the original.
No, fans, I am sorry to say but this sequel is not any of the above described in those rave reviews, but rather is of poor quality, quantity, and altogether unrecognizable as even being in the same category as its predecessor...And I hate having to say that because I am NOT one who bashes horror movies, or are overly harsh in my critiquing them. I'm a die hard horror fan and I love even some of the most lower-alphabet-grade of horror flicks! I give them praise and point out all the great about each/all of them. So, for me to have this opinion on this sequel is not only surprising to me, but is just a great disappointment all around where this movie's concerned.
I suppose this was bound to happen, but I certainly never thought it'd have been a "V/H/S" film that was to be the flick to deliver me such disappointment! I say skip it, and instead go watch the original, V/H/S, because without a doubt it delivers on every single level a horror movie should, and it does so in repeated viewings, and not just a single, one-time, first viewing type of way.
- jswindter01
- Jul 14, 2014
- Permalink
Usually it takes a few entries in a franchise before it starts going off the rails. V/H/S manages it in just one. For starters, the whole concept of VHS tapes seems to completely go out the window as most of these segments are not filmed on VHS tapes and have no reason to be transferred to VHS tapes. As well, the presence of certain modern-era cell phones means that the time period they're taking place in would be long after the end of VHS.
Not just a case of "VHS got old and people stopped using it" but almost all major companies that made blank VHS tapes had stopped by the time even the earliest of smartphones were starting to come out.
But even leaving that aside, these entries just aren't good at all. As well, the insane number of different camera angles and cuts means that each one had to have multiple people filming, all their camera footage collected, and edited together by someone onto a VHS tape of all formats.
Also, they killed the dog in one segment. 0 stars.
Not just a case of "VHS got old and people stopped using it" but almost all major companies that made blank VHS tapes had stopped by the time even the earliest of smartphones were starting to come out.
But even leaving that aside, these entries just aren't good at all. As well, the insane number of different camera angles and cuts means that each one had to have multiple people filming, all their camera footage collected, and edited together by someone onto a VHS tape of all formats.
Also, they killed the dog in one segment. 0 stars.
- phenomynouss
- Sep 3, 2023
- Permalink
We've got a rarity, folks. More than 2012's solid horror short amalgamation V/H/S which was primarily an assault on our primal fears (and descended into emotional bleakness at times because of it) this follow-up, while still hitting the right nerves, is also funnier, more self aware, more emotionally potent, and unafraid to venture into the far reaches of the genre. Instead of just ghostly tales presented in the found footage format we get infinitely clever approaches to zombies, aliens, demons and, for good measure, spirits as well.
It is such a rarity because everything about V/H/S/2 is superior to the original even if I would have loved to see the veritable Ti West (who directed a segment as well as feature fare House of the Devil and The Innkeepers) return for another go I can't raise any other grudges. This sequel is leaner by a good 30 minutes, as I mentioned the segments are more varied in their sub genre, the framing story (i.e. the context as to why we're watching these vignettes) is scarier and lastly the film is more effective and as a whole because, simply put, the segments are aggregately stronger.
Also for round two, behind each story are better known directors, though of course notoriety isn't always an indication of talent, their experience behind the camera and in the genre is certainly on display. Returning for another go are Simon Barrett and Adam Wingard who contribute the wrap-around entry and Phase I Clinical Trials respectively, and are joined by Eduardo Sanchez and Gregg Hale (The Blair Witch Project) with A Ride in the Park, Gareth Evans (The Raid) with Safe Haven and lastly Jason Eisner (Hobo With a Shotgun) with the wonderfully titled Alien Abduction Slumber Party.
By far the two strongest stories are A Ride in the Park and Safe Haven. Though I may be biased, my personal favourite is the former. Why you ask? One word: zombies. With my affinity for the flesh chompers through the roof, any unique take on the genre wins my affection to an extent and when it is as fun, gory and bittersweet as A Ride in the Park my heart belongs to it indefinitely. This segment follows a mountain biker with a helmet cam running into a hoard of the undead, is subsequently bitten, and then gives birth to zombie vision (by far the best type of vision). The camera work, dark humour and understanding of the tragic, damned nature of these creatures gels to truly wonderful effect.
Safe Haven on the other hand is just balls-out insane, taking the kinetic blood letting of Evans' The Raid and blending it with the sensibilities of Rosemary's Baby and Martha Marcy May Marlene. When Evans isn't directing the hell out of his short, he's presenting us with some truly unsettling imagery before going all Cabin in the Woods and setting us down in a completely different place then when we started. One scene in particular that showcases his filmmaking prowess comes during a sequence involving a car crash. How anyone could pull off such a shot is beyond me but to do so with no budget is another achievement entirely.
The other two main segments aren't quite as strong but what they lack in sustained ingenuity they make up for in straight up efficiency. Phase I Clinical Trials is essentially a mechanized blend of The Eye though the scares are certainly present. There is a sense of déjà vu in how a number of the sequences unfurl but if they can still make you grip your own fingers, then something is going right. Alien Invasion Slumber Party is a fantastic exercise in the use of sound as a force of Greys terrorizes a group of teens at a lakehouse. Anybody versed in horror will be no stranger to how important sound and musical chords are (and how often they're abused) and their significance is literally amplified here. Eisner's contribution may not be as scary as some of the others, but its urgency and sense of dread make up for it.
I already iterated the upgrade that was the connecting material (featuring a pair of private investigators looking for a missing college student) though it suffers from the same inherent fault of that from the first film, that in having to break it up, tension is lost along the way. But far less then the original does it feel like a slog or burden – a watch-watcher while we wait for the next installment to begin.
Horror fans should ultimately love what V/H/S/2 is dishing out, if not for its startling competency for the fact it has something for everyone. Not only that it uses its found footage format not to pander to fans of the popular gimmick but to both enhance the experience and approach it as a barrier – one that needs to be overcome using creative means. This anthology is a blast from beginning to end and the rare sequel of any genre to recognize the shortcomings of the first and not only fix them but freshen everything else up as well.
It is such a rarity because everything about V/H/S/2 is superior to the original even if I would have loved to see the veritable Ti West (who directed a segment as well as feature fare House of the Devil and The Innkeepers) return for another go I can't raise any other grudges. This sequel is leaner by a good 30 minutes, as I mentioned the segments are more varied in their sub genre, the framing story (i.e. the context as to why we're watching these vignettes) is scarier and lastly the film is more effective and as a whole because, simply put, the segments are aggregately stronger.
Also for round two, behind each story are better known directors, though of course notoriety isn't always an indication of talent, their experience behind the camera and in the genre is certainly on display. Returning for another go are Simon Barrett and Adam Wingard who contribute the wrap-around entry and Phase I Clinical Trials respectively, and are joined by Eduardo Sanchez and Gregg Hale (The Blair Witch Project) with A Ride in the Park, Gareth Evans (The Raid) with Safe Haven and lastly Jason Eisner (Hobo With a Shotgun) with the wonderfully titled Alien Abduction Slumber Party.
By far the two strongest stories are A Ride in the Park and Safe Haven. Though I may be biased, my personal favourite is the former. Why you ask? One word: zombies. With my affinity for the flesh chompers through the roof, any unique take on the genre wins my affection to an extent and when it is as fun, gory and bittersweet as A Ride in the Park my heart belongs to it indefinitely. This segment follows a mountain biker with a helmet cam running into a hoard of the undead, is subsequently bitten, and then gives birth to zombie vision (by far the best type of vision). The camera work, dark humour and understanding of the tragic, damned nature of these creatures gels to truly wonderful effect.
Safe Haven on the other hand is just balls-out insane, taking the kinetic blood letting of Evans' The Raid and blending it with the sensibilities of Rosemary's Baby and Martha Marcy May Marlene. When Evans isn't directing the hell out of his short, he's presenting us with some truly unsettling imagery before going all Cabin in the Woods and setting us down in a completely different place then when we started. One scene in particular that showcases his filmmaking prowess comes during a sequence involving a car crash. How anyone could pull off such a shot is beyond me but to do so with no budget is another achievement entirely.
The other two main segments aren't quite as strong but what they lack in sustained ingenuity they make up for in straight up efficiency. Phase I Clinical Trials is essentially a mechanized blend of The Eye though the scares are certainly present. There is a sense of déjà vu in how a number of the sequences unfurl but if they can still make you grip your own fingers, then something is going right. Alien Invasion Slumber Party is a fantastic exercise in the use of sound as a force of Greys terrorizes a group of teens at a lakehouse. Anybody versed in horror will be no stranger to how important sound and musical chords are (and how often they're abused) and their significance is literally amplified here. Eisner's contribution may not be as scary as some of the others, but its urgency and sense of dread make up for it.
I already iterated the upgrade that was the connecting material (featuring a pair of private investigators looking for a missing college student) though it suffers from the same inherent fault of that from the first film, that in having to break it up, tension is lost along the way. But far less then the original does it feel like a slog or burden – a watch-watcher while we wait for the next installment to begin.
Horror fans should ultimately love what V/H/S/2 is dishing out, if not for its startling competency for the fact it has something for everyone. Not only that it uses its found footage format not to pander to fans of the popular gimmick but to both enhance the experience and approach it as a barrier – one that needs to be overcome using creative means. This anthology is a blast from beginning to end and the rare sequel of any genre to recognize the shortcomings of the first and not only fix them but freshen everything else up as well.
- Simon_Says_Movies
- Jul 6, 2013
- Permalink
Today with all those mockumentaries and so-called paranormal stuff filmed on tape and tapes being found I'm close to get fed up with those kind of movies. But I was warned by the magazines specialized in horror that this was a must see. Sure, the producers claimed that it would be better than part 1 and that it all would be a gory ride and that you will be scared from the first minute and not like the Paranormal Activity franchise were you have to wait a long time before things go awry.
I was one of those who didn't like the original entry, V/H/S due some parts being rather boring like the episode with the Skype stuff. Starting of with V/H/S 2 I immediately was surprised by the full frontal nudity from a man and the close up of naked juggs. But from there on it was just a disappointment with the first episode. The only thing you wanted was that the strange girl visiting the house of the one with the cyborg eye would undress and see, talking about paranormal activity, that's exactly what she did. But after that it was just laughable with those ghosts appearing before the windows. I almost even stopped the whole flick, luckily I didn't.
Once the worst was over we move to the other episodes and from there on the gore and creepiness comes in. All filmed in the same style with the notorious GoPro camera's it all looked shaky and wobbly but it worked out fine due the gore slowly coming in with the second episode concerning zombies. I liked it but thought we were going downhill remembering V/H/S and was afraid to move further in episode 3, but what the hell was that. This was extremely gory and even creepy about some cult waiting for the devil to arrive. Excellent entry. The last episode is about some alien attack, not that bad at all.
This is surely an improvement towards the original. I gave it a 7 because the first entry was stupid and laughable otherwise I would rate it 8. Better directors (Eduardo Sanchez from Blair Witch Project) made this an excellent entry in the found footage generation and surely one to embrace.
Gore 3/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 3/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5
I was one of those who didn't like the original entry, V/H/S due some parts being rather boring like the episode with the Skype stuff. Starting of with V/H/S 2 I immediately was surprised by the full frontal nudity from a man and the close up of naked juggs. But from there on it was just a disappointment with the first episode. The only thing you wanted was that the strange girl visiting the house of the one with the cyborg eye would undress and see, talking about paranormal activity, that's exactly what she did. But after that it was just laughable with those ghosts appearing before the windows. I almost even stopped the whole flick, luckily I didn't.
Once the worst was over we move to the other episodes and from there on the gore and creepiness comes in. All filmed in the same style with the notorious GoPro camera's it all looked shaky and wobbly but it worked out fine due the gore slowly coming in with the second episode concerning zombies. I liked it but thought we were going downhill remembering V/H/S and was afraid to move further in episode 3, but what the hell was that. This was extremely gory and even creepy about some cult waiting for the devil to arrive. Excellent entry. The last episode is about some alien attack, not that bad at all.
This is surely an improvement towards the original. I gave it a 7 because the first entry was stupid and laughable otherwise I would rate it 8. Better directors (Eduardo Sanchez from Blair Witch Project) made this an excellent entry in the found footage generation and surely one to embrace.
Gore 3/5 Nudity 1/5 Effects 3/5 Story 3/5 Comedy 0/5
The first VHS was not that bad. Some of the episodes were down right creepy, original and had good actors. Though one episode with ghosts / demons was pretty stupid and over the top.
But it was entertaining and fairly good. So I give it a 8 / 10 rating.
Now this VHS 2 is a downright waste of time: Bad acting, super predictable plot, not original and just downright boring and not scary at all.
They also use way too much zombies in this one. Zombies that runs to the camera and saying "UUuaaaAaargghAA".... veeery scary -_-
It also falls into one of found footage biggest problem: Why would you film this? Or why would you even carry a camera at this point?
Also it uses multiple camera angels which makes no sense, so they could have basically just shot it like a normal movie.
But then they couldn't mask up their horrible camera work, effects and bad acting.
Speaking of effects = Super annoying "broken" camera effects and scratchy metallic sounds constantly used to cut to other scenes or mask horrible acting and effects.
Worst crap I ever saw. Avoid at all cost.
But it was entertaining and fairly good. So I give it a 8 / 10 rating.
Now this VHS 2 is a downright waste of time: Bad acting, super predictable plot, not original and just downright boring and not scary at all.
They also use way too much zombies in this one. Zombies that runs to the camera and saying "UUuaaaAaargghAA".... veeery scary -_-
It also falls into one of found footage biggest problem: Why would you film this? Or why would you even carry a camera at this point?
Also it uses multiple camera angels which makes no sense, so they could have basically just shot it like a normal movie.
But then they couldn't mask up their horrible camera work, effects and bad acting.
Speaking of effects = Super annoying "broken" camera effects and scratchy metallic sounds constantly used to cut to other scenes or mask horrible acting and effects.
Worst crap I ever saw. Avoid at all cost.