100% found this document useful (1 vote)
595 views17 pages

Testing of DC Motor

This document discusses different methods for testing DC motors: direct method, Swinburne's indirect method, and Hopkinson's regenerative method. The direct method uses a brake test and spring balances for small motors. Swinburne's method separately measures no-load losses and is commonly used. Hopkinson's method uses two identical machines coupled together to operate as a motor and generator, allowing tests under full-load conditions. The conclusions compare the power requirements and capabilities of each testing method.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
595 views17 pages

Testing of DC Motor

This document discusses different methods for testing DC motors: direct method, Swinburne's indirect method, and Hopkinson's regenerative method. The direct method uses a brake test and spring balances for small motors. Swinburne's method separately measures no-load losses and is commonly used. Hopkinson's method uses two identical machines coupled together to operate as a motor and generator, allowing tests under full-load conditions. The conclusions compare the power requirements and capabilities of each testing method.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 17

TESTING OF DC MOTORS

BIRBHUM INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY


PRITAM GHOSH
EE-08/14
3rd YEAR, 5th SEM
ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
CONTENTS
 WHY TESTING OF A DC MOTOR IS REQUIRED?

 TYPES OF TESTING OF A DC MOTOR

 DIRECT METHOD OF TESTING OF A DC MOTOR

 SWINBURNE’S METHOD OF TESTING OF A DC MOTOR

 REGENERATIVE OR HOPKINSON’S METHOD OF TESTING OF A DC MOTOR

 CONCLUSION

 REFERENCE
WHY TESTING OF A DC MOTOR IS REQUIRED?

Performance of the
machine

Losses & efficiency of


the machine

Quality of the materials


used

Modification in
manufacturing process
TYPES OF TESTING OF A DC MOTOR

DIRECT METHOD

INDIRECT METHOD OR SWINBURNE’S


METHOD

REGENERATIVE METHOD OR
HOPKINSON’S METHOD
DIRECT METHOD
Suitable for small D.C.
Machines

Brake test for D.C. Motors

Belt pulley arrangement


attached to spring
balances S1 & S2

Loads on pulley adjusted


by hand WHEELS H1 & H2
EFFICIENCY CALCULATION
 Motor output power= ω*(S1 – S2)*r*9.81 watts
 Motor input power= Vt * Il watts
 Motor efficiency, ηm = [{ω*(S1 – S2)*r*9.81 }*100/(Vt * Il )]%
PRECAUTION

• THE BRAKE SHOULD BE


SUFFICIENTLY TIGHT FOR
A DC SERIES MOTOR

DISADVANTAGES
• Size of the motor is
restricted

• Spring balance readings


are not steady
SWINBURNE’S METHOD OF TESTING A DC MOTOR

• Most commonly used and simplest method of testing of shunt and


compound wound dc machines

• No load losses are measured separately


EFFICIENCY CALCULATION
 Power absorbed by armature at no load= Vt *Ia0
 Armature circuit loss = Ia02 *ra
 No load rotational losses, W0 = (Vt *Ia0) – (Ia02 *ra )
 Shunt field loss= Vt *If
 Power input = Vt*IL
 IL = I a + I f
 Efficiency of the motor: ηm =1- [{W0 + (Ia02 *ra )+ (Vt *If )}/ (Vt*IL)]%
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 Iron loss is neglected

 Required very less power  We cannot be sure about the


satisfactory commutation on
loaded condition

 Since constant losses are known,  We can’t measure the


efficiency of Swinburne's test can temperature rise when the
be pre-determined at any load machine is loaded

 In dc series motor, the


Swinburne’s test cannot be done
HOPKINSON’S METHOD OF TESTING A DC MOTOR

 Two identical dc machines are


coupled, both mechanically &
electrically

 One of these two machines is


operated as a generator to supply
the electrical power to the motor
and the other is operated as a
motor to drive the generator

 Due to the drop in the generator


output voltage we need an extra
voltage source to supply the
proper input motor-generator set
EFFICIENCY CALCULATION
 Input to motor armature= Vt*I1
 Motor armature circuit loss= I12 *ra
 Motor shunt field loss= Vt*If1
 No-load rotational loss in two machines, W0= (Vt*I)- ra*(I12+I22)
 No-load rotational loss in each machine=W0/2
 Total motor loss, Wm = (W0/2)+(Vt*If1)+(I12 *ra)
 Motor efficiency: ηm = [1-{Wm/Vt*(I1+If1)}]*100%
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
 Very small power required  Difficult to find two identical
machines

 Both machines cannot be loaded


 Temperature rise and commutation equally all the time
can be observed

 It is not possible to get separate iron


losses for the two machines

 Change in iron loss due to flux


distortion can be taken into account  It is difficult to operate the machines
due to the advantage of its full load at rated speed because field currents
condition vary widely
CONCLUSION

 Each process is necessary for testing of different kinds of dc


motors

 Power required in Direct Method is much greater than that in


other two methods

 No load rotational loss for a particular machine can be


determined separately only by Indirect Method
REFERENCE
Electrical Machinery, Dr. P. S. Bimbhra
Chapter: D.C. Machines(Page No. 495-501 )
http://www.electrical4u.com/hopkinsons-
test/
http://www.electrical4u.com/swinburnes-
test-of-dc-machine/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_motor

You might also like