Destination India
Destination India
Destination India:
                                                                    Welcome Retail
                                                                    Legal, Tax & Regulatory
                                                                    Primer with Industry insight
September 2018
September 2018
ndaconnect@nishithdesai.com
Contents
                              1.   INTRODUCTION                                                                                    01
2. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS 03
2. REGULATORY REGIME 10
                                   I.      Franchise Agreements                                                                    35
                                   II.     Strategic Licensing Agreements                                                          36
                                   III.    Manufacturing and Wholly Owned Subsidiaries                                             37
                                   IV.     Investment into an Indian owned and controlled company                                  37
                                   V.      Investment in Back end Structure                                                        38
                                   VI.     Operating based on Marketplace Model                                                    38
                                   VII. Operating based on Inventory based Model                                                   38
                                   VIII. Investment under the Foreign Portfolio Investment Route                                   39
                                   IX. Investment in brands using step down subsidiary model                                       39
4. CONCLUSION 40
1. Introduction
                                                             the Global Retail Development Index 2017,
I. The Indian Retail Story                                   backed by rising middle class and rapidly
                                                             growing consumer spending. India’s retail
The Indian retail sector has experienced
                                                             market witnessed investments worth USD
incredible growth over the last decade with
                                                             800 million by private equity firms and
a significant shift towards organised retailing
                                                             wealth funds in 2017. 3
format. Despite socio-political challenges and
stringent conditionalities on foreign direct
investment (“FDI”) in retail trading, the Indian             II. Global Positioning of the
retail sector has grown too large to ignore.                     Indian Retail Sector
India’s strong growth fundamentals, increased
urbanization, increased digital connectivity                 Markets go through four stages of retail
and greater acceptance to online retail medium               development (opening, peaking, maturing
provides immense scope for retail expansion for              and closing) as they evolve from emerging
both domestic and foreign players.                           to mature markets, a process that typically
                                                             spans five to 10 years.
India’s retail market contributes to over 10
percent of the country’s Gross Domestic Product              The window opens when the population
(GDP) and around 8 percent of the employment.                becomes wealthier, when logistics start
The share of the Indian retail market is expected            improving, when ownership regulations
to increase by 60 percent to reach USD 1.1 trillion          become friendlier to international firms and
by the year 2020.1                                           when country’s various economic, political
                                                             and social risks settle down to acceptable levels.
Both organized and unorganized retail segments
co-exist in India and continue to contribute to              Given the current circumstances in India one
growth of the retail sector as a whole.                      can say that there exists immense window of
                                                             opportunity for retail development in India.
Currently, the organized retail market
contributes to 93 percent of the total sector while          India holds a substantial advantage over other
the unorganized retail market contributes to the             emerging retail destinations owing to its strong
rest.2 This was not the same few years ago when              domestic consumption and low rate of market
substantial business came from unorganized                   penetration by overseas retailers.
retail sector such as traditional family run
                                                             Accordingly, India remains an attractive
and corner stores. The impressive growth
                                                             destination for investment.
of the organized sector is also largely due to
penetration of many large retail companies and
introduction of Goods and Service Tax in India.              III. Factors Considered by
                                                                  Various Stakeholders
A. Outlook of Indian Retail Sector
                                                             There is a paradigm shift in global investors’
The Indian retail market is expected to become
                                                             destination choices: from ‘efficiency seeking’
the world’s third-largest consumer economy,
                                                             to ‘market seeking.’ Also, there is a shift from
reaching USD 400 billion in consumption by
                                                             sectors which are heavily regulated to more
the year 2025. Further, India is ranked first in
                                                             varied industries including healthcare, retail,
                                                             education etc.
1.   https://www.ibef.org/industry/retail-india.aspx. Last
     accessed: June 13, 2018.
2.   Ibid                                                    3.   Ibid
2. Industry Analysis
I. The Concept of Retail
                                                                            Retail expansion is a portfolio game where
A perfect business model for retail in India is                             an optimal mix of countries, formats and
still at the evolutionary stage. AT Kearney terms                           operating models is the key to success.
retail expansion as a portfolio game where an
optimal mix of countries, formats and operating
models is the key to success.
                                                                          The emphasis on the business-to-consumer
In this section, we analyze certain formats and                           format remains, which must be differentiated
models alongside thriving segments. However,                              from the business-to-business dealings, i.e.
the traditional unorganised formats like ‘mom                             wholesale.
and pop’ shops, hawkers, grocers etc., continue
                                                                          Further, it is important to distinguish between
to co-exist with the modern formats of retailing.
                                                                          the terms ‘retailing’ and ‘retail trading’ which
 Taking a step back, the very definition of ‘retail’/                     are often used interchangeably. Retail trading
’retailer’ has changed. In 2004, the High Court of                        is a subset of retailing (which is a far broader
 Delhi defined the term ‘retail’ as a sale for final                      term), and foresees the buying and selling
 consumption in contrast to a sale for further sale                       of goods to retail consumers. The FDI Policy
 or processing (i.e. wholesale).4                                         contains conditions on foreign investment in
                                                                          retail trading and not retailing. Entities selling
However, the traditional definition of a retail
                                                                          goods to retail consumers by undertaking
shop referred to business premises where goods
                                                                          manufacturing / contract manufacturing or
are sold to the public, or services are provided to
                                                                          under franchise and license agreements are said
the public, or to which the public is invited to
                                                                          to be engaged in retailing and not retail trading.
negotiate for the supply of services. Due to the
                                                                          Examples of entities engaged in retailing in
emergence of e-commerce and m-commerce the
                                                                          India include Hindustan Unilever Limited &
physical/territorial component of the definition
                                                                          McDonald’s.
no longer holds true.
Such retailers manage to surpass the barrier
of direct personal contact and reach out to the
                                                                          II. Formats
public via alternative media. While customers
                                                                          In modern retail, a key strategic choice is the
place orders online, the delivery takes place
                                                                          format; retailers are coming up with various
elsewhere, most likely at their doorsteps.
                                                                          innovative formats to provide an edge to their
Interestingly, judicial decisions on ‘retail’ always
                                                                          products and services. Retailers experiment
provided scope for such broad construction,
                                                                          with a variety of formats, from discount stores
indicating that delivery and sale need not be
                                                                          to supermarkets to hypermarkets to specialty
simultaneous or occurring at the same place.
                                                                          chains etc.
                                                                          The table below explains some popular formats
                                                                          used in the retail sector:
iii.Specialty stores and category                                 growing in popularity. This is the most preferred
    killers                                                       since it provides a ‘click n buy’ method. Also the
                                                                  e-retailers provide facilities such as e-payment,
Specialty stores are retail chains dealing in specific            home delivery, and gift option. Many companies
categories and provide a large variety. Mobile                    find e-commerce more profitable than resorting
stores can be an example of specialty store.                      to traditional forms of advertising.
Category killers are specialty stores that offer                  The acceptance of internet coupled with the
a variety of product categories. They are known                   increasing confidence of the internet users to
as ‘category killers’ since they focus on specific                purchase online has made India an important
categories, such as electronics and sporting                      center for the growth and development of the
goods. They are also known as Multi Brand                         e-commerce sector. In particular, e-commerce
Outlets or MBO’s. Vijay Sales can be an example                   presents one of the greatest opportunities in
of category killer.                                               the retail sector since it shifts from brick and
                                                                  mortar establishments to virtual shops which
                                                                  with low operating costs.
iv. Other formats
                                                                  Global and local e-commerce retailers have
Traditionally, India has been familiar with
                                                                  launched websites that offer Indian consumers
departmental stores and discount stores.
                                                                  wide range of products such as apparel,
However, with increased urbanisation and
                                                                  electronics, baby products, etc. Also, recently we
use of technology, several new formats have
                                                                  have seen huge FDI inflows and consolidation
evolved with passage of time. For example:
                                                                  activity in the e-commerce space in India.
     i. Gas stations are providing amenities in                   Given the regulatory framework in India, most
        the form of convenience stores, automated                 e-commerce retailers could be seen to shift to
        teller machine (ATM), food courts and                     the marketplace model of business wherein the
        pharmacies appearing in many outlets.                     e-commerce entity merely acts as a facilitator
                                                                  between the buyer and seller and only provides
     ii. Vending machine, almost always identified
                                                                  for a platform where the consumer meets the
         with Japan’s retail formats, is a relatively
                                                                  seller. Given the recent FDI relaxations, the
         new entrant to India and usage will rise
                                                                  Indian e-commerce market could see more
         with changing consumer habits and
                                                                  retailers adopting this business model.
         lifestyle.
                                                                  For detail understanding of the E-commerce
     iii. Along with the modern retail formats,
                                                                  in India, you may refer to our research paper
          the non-store retailing channels are
                                                                  on this subject.
          also witnessing action. Online retail is
          estimated to reach USD 60 billion by
          2020.7 Post demonetization in India,
                                                                  vi. M-commerce
          consumers have seemingly become                         Mobile commerce is a sub–set of E-commerce.
          more comfortable using online services.                 The selling and buying of goods and services
                                                                  through mobile devices and smart phones is
                                                                  referred as M-commerce. The advantage of
v. E- commerce                                                    m-commerce is its personalization, flexibility,
Electronic commerce commonly known as                             and distribution. It also promises exceptional
E-commerce is a more convenient way for                           business market potential, greater efficiency
buying and selling of products or services                        and higher productivity. With the initiation of
through the electronic medium which is                            mobile internet services the retail industry is
                                                                  also relieved as it provides easy mobile payment
                                                                  options. But as a security concern, there are
7.    https://www.ibef.org/download/Retail-June-20181.pdf. Last   certain banking regulations which are deterring
      accessed: June 15, 2018.                                    the growth of m-commerce in India. Most of
the E-commerce players like Flipkart, Amazon etc. have dedicated mobile apps. With the increase in
digital banking and payments penetration in India and the Unified Payments Interface8 platform by
the Indian Government, m-commerce has grown considerably.
    Format                                         Retailer
    Supermarket                                    Big Bazaar / More / HyperCity / Food World
    Hypermarket                                    D-Mart /Star Bazaar/ Spencer’s / Spar
    E-commerce                                     Flipkart / Snapdeal / Amazon
    Small fashion stores                           Fabindia
    Cash and carry                                 Metro / Walmart
    Large Electronic Store                         Croma / E-zone / Vijay Sales
                                                           Leading brands
    Indian                                                          International
    Food Bazaar, Nature’s Basket, Big Basket,                       Metro /Walmart
    Reliance Fresh, Grofers
8.    Unified Payments Interface (UPI) is an instant payment system developed by the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), an
      RBI regulated entity. UPI is built over the IMPS infrastructure and allows you to instantly transfer money between any two parties’
      bank accounts.
9.    https://www.indiaretailing.com/2018/02/13/food/food-grocery/food-retailing-india-way-forward/. Last accessed: June 16, 2018.
10. Supra note 4.
11. https://www.indiaretailing.com/2017/10/15/fashion/indian-fashion-apparel-market-2016-beyond/. Last accessed: June 16, 2018.
with DLF, popular Indian real estate developer. This sector has also witnessed the entry of foreign retail
brands such as H&M, Massimo Dutti, etc. in recent times.
                                                         Leading brands
 Indian                                                          International
 Provogue, Wills Lifestyle Reliance Footprint,                   Zara, Mango, Marks & Spencer, Charles & Keith,
 Woodland                                                        Hush Puppies, H&M, Massimo Dutti
C. Pharma retail
Pharma retailing in India is said to have a market size of USD 467 billion.12 In 2015, the initial
public offer (IPO) of Dr Lal PathLabs, one of India’s largest diagnostic chains, received bids for an
overwhelming total of 27.12 crore shares.13 A few corporates who have already forayed into this
segment include Dr. Morepen (with Lifespring and Tango), Medicine Shoppe, Apollo Pharmacies,
98.4 from Global Healthline Pvt Ltd. and CRS Health.
                                                         Leading brands
 Indian                                                           International
 Crosswords, Relay                                               W H Smith
                                                       Leading brands
    Indian                                                       International
    Croma, e-Zone                                                Samsung, Sony
                                                                    17. https://retail.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/
                                                                        industry/-indian-retail-industry-from-potential-to-perfor-
                                                                        mance/59141590. Last accessed: June 16, 2018.
15. https://www.ibef.org/industry/indian-consumer-market.aspx.      18. Issues Monitor, July 2011.
    Last accessed: June 16, 2018.
                                                                    19. Mattoo, A. D.Mishra and A. Narain, From competition at home to
16. Ibid                                                                competing abroad: A case study of India’s horticulture, 2007.
2. Regulatory Regime
From the very wide range of retail segments          sector, a single-window clearance system to
that we have taken a look at, evidently, retail      streamline license processes associated with
sector cuts across various industries and business   establishing retail stores, tax and investment
models. As a consequence, there is a higher          incentives, among other things.22
possibility of regulatory overlap. While general
                                                     While countries like Spain, Denmark and
corporate, tax, commercial laws and laws related
                                                     Bhutan have experimented with a national
to intellectual property, trade and employment
                                                     legislation to regulate retail trading, the general
laws remain applicable to the retail industry, as
                                                     trend has been to leave regulation of retail
in the case of any other industry, some regulatory
                                                     trading to provincial/regional authorities, as has
aspects might get triggered on account of the
                                                     been done in the UK and Australia.
format or business model that the investor
chooses to adopt, m-commerce, for instance.          One can draw a pattern of retail regulation
                                                     from most jurisdictions including India: retail
                                                     outlets have been brought within the purview
I. Regulatory Patterns Across                        of other generic legislations that deal with taxes,
   the Globe                                         pricing, weights and measures, shopping hours,
                                                     marketing/advertising practices, licensing,
 As we shall see, there have been proposals for      employment etc. Given the complexity of retail
 setting up a National Retail Authority, which       structures and diversity of its segments, this
 are yet to attain any momentum in the industry      approach makes the most sense. Also, one might
 space. With respect to unorganized retail,          note that legislations that cater to the needs of
 the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty           one country cannot be replicated in another.
 Alleviation has formulated a National Policy        For example, some countries have ‘blue laws’,
 for Urban Street Vendors. However, at the           i.e. laws that deal with religious observances,
 moment, there is no single regulatory authority     which might be entirely inapplicable in the
 that governs the organized retail sector; nor is    context of other countries.
 there any umbrella legislation. Under List I of
                                                     Interestingly, retail trading also provides some
 Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India,
                                                     scope for ‘private regulations’ where a powerful
 Inter-State trade and commerce is a subject
                                                     retailer might want manufacturers or service
 for the Parliament, the Central legislative
                                                     providers to comply with in terms of quality,
 body, to enact upon. Under List II, however,
                                                     carbon footprint etc. before their products can
 trade and commerce within a State is a State
                                                     be sold through that retail chain. The antitrust
 subject. A regulatory framework to govern
                                                     and trade implications of such private norms
 retail sector, consequently, might need the
                                                     enforced solely through the market forces,
 approval of the individual States under the
                                                     is an intriguing legal issue.
 Constitution. However, this position might
 undergo substantial changes if the Government
 pays heed to the stakeholders who demand
‘industry’ status for retail. This is hoped to
 entail developing a Ministry responsible and
 accountable for the growth and interests of the
II. Foreign Direct Investment                                        states that companies who engage in the activity
    Regime                                                           of buying and selling by a company through
                                                                     the e-commerce platform would engage only in
                                                                     Business to Business (B2B) e-commerce and not
FDI in India is regulated under Foreign
                                                                     in retail trading. However, provision of services
Exchange Management Act, 1999 (“FEMA”).
                                                                     by e-commerce companies to retail consumers
The Department of Industrial Policy and
                                                                     is not covered under this restriction.
Promotion (“DIPP”), Ministry of Commerce &
Industry, Government of India makes policy                           FDI Policy specifies eligible investors. A non-
pronouncements on FDI through Press Notes/                           resident entity can invest in India subject to the
Press Releases which are notified by the Reserve                     FDI Policy. A citizen of Bangladesh or an entity
Bank of India (“RBI”) as amendments to Foreign                       incorporated in Bangladesh can invest only
Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of                            under the Government route. Further,
Security by Persons Resident Outside India)                          a citizen of Pakistan or an entity incorporated in
Regulations, 2000.                                                   Pakistan can invest, only under the Government
                                                                     route, in sectors/activities other than defence,
Paragraph 3.6.1 of consolidated FDI policy23
                                                                     space and atomic energy. FDI Policy also
(“FDI Policy”) lays down two entry routes
                                                                     details the types of instruments through
for investment: the automatic route and the
                                                                     which an investor can invest into India. Issue
government/approval route. Under the latter,
                                                                     of shares, fully, compulsorily and mandatorily
prior approval of the Government of India
                                                                     convertible debentures and preference shares
through DIPP is required. After the abolition
                                                                     are counted as FDI. The inward remittance
of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board,
                                                                     received by an Indian company by way of
applications for foreign investment in retail
                                                                     issuance of depository receipts and foreign
sector would directly lie before the DIPP.
                                                                     currency convertible bonds is also counted as
Investments can be made by non-residents in
                                                                     FDI. Subject to FDI sectoral policy, non-resident
the capital of a resident entity only to the extent
                                                                     investors can also invest in Indian companies
of the percentage of the total capital (sectoral
                                                                     by purchasing/acquiring existing shares from
caps) as provided in the FDI Policy.
                                                                     Indian shareholders or from other non-resident
Accordingly, DIPP in press notes 4 and 5 (2012                       shareholders. However, if the activity of the
Series) inserted/ modified paragraphs 6.2.16.4                       Indian company falls outside the automatic
and 6.2.16.5 of FDI Policy allowing FDI in single                    route (i.e. in cases where a prior approval from
brand product retail trading (100 percent)                           the Government agencies or RBI is required) as
and multi brand retail trading (51 percent)                          multi brand retail trading does, such transfer
respectively with prior approval of DIPP subject                     requires RBI approval.
to compliance of certain conditions. This has
                                                                     A general permission is granted for issue of
now been liberalised by the DIPP in January
                                                                     equity shares/preference shares against lump
2018 whereby it allowed FDI in SBRT up to 100
                                                                     sum technical knowhow fee, royalty, subject to
percent under the automatic route.24 Further,
                                                                     entry route, sectoral cap and pricing guidelines
paragraph 6.2 of the FDI Policy states FDI into
                                                                     and compliance with applicable tax laws.
cash & carry wholesale trading is allowed
up to 100 percent under automatic route                              As far as the entities into which FDI can be
provided that certain conditions are satisfied.                      made, non-resident investors enjoy a choice
Additionally, Paragraph 6.2.16.2.1 of FDI Policy                     from among companies, partnership firms/
                                                                     proprietary concerns/ limited liability
                                                                     partnership and Venture Capital Funds (VCFs)
23. Consolidated FDI Policy 2017 which came into effect from
                                                                     subject to adherence to conditions of FDI Policy.
    August 28, 2017
                                                                     For example: 100 percent foreign investment
24. Our analysis of this press note is available here: http://www.
    nishithdesai.com/information/news-storage/news-details/          in limited liability partnership is allowed
    article/fdi-reforms-in-india-government-committed-to-            under automatic route in sectors where no
    wards-ease-doing-business.html
Government approval is required and is not                        its early and undeveloped stage (particularly
subject to any sector specific conditionalities.                  the domestic organized retail segment) it is not
Accordingly, foreign investment is currently not                  in a position to compete with large players.
possible in limited liability partnership engaged                 As a result, the Government policy has largely
in retail trading. There are guidelines laid down                 been to protect agriculturist and small retailers
in FDI Policy on the calculation of total foreign                 and therefore has discouraged entry of bigger
investment i.e. direct and indirect foreign                       retailers. Thus, participation of foreign investors
investment in India.                                              in the retail sector was prohibited.
A snapshot of the existing FDI limits in the
trading sector under the FDI Policy is as follows:
It also lists a number of ‘valid business            It is important to know the objectives the
customers’ with whom wholesale transactions          Government had in mind while allowing
can be entered into (besides the Government).        foreign investment in SBRT will be helpful for
These entities should be either: a) holders of       prospective investors at the stage of formulating
sales tax/ VAT registration/service tax/excise       their FDI proposals. The objectives were:
duty registration; b) holders of trade licenses
                                                       a. attracting investments in production and
under Shops and Establishment Act, issued by
                                                          marketing;
the relevant governmental authority, indicating
that the purchaser is engaged in a business            b. improving the availability of such goods
involving commercial activity; c) holders of              for the consumer;
permits/license for undertaking retail trade (like
                                                       c. encouraging increased sourcing of goods
tehbazari and similar license for hawkers) from
                                                          from India;
the relevant authority; or d) institutions having
a certificate of incorporation or registration         d. enhancing competitiveness of Indian enter-
as a society or registration as public trust for          prises through access to global designs,
their self-consumption.                                   technologies and management practices.
Full records indicating all the details of           FDI in SBRT is subject to following conditions:
such sales like name of entity, kind of entity,
                                                       a. Products to be sold should be of a ‘Single
registration/license/permit etc. number, amount
                                                          Brand’ only.
of sale etc. should be maintained on a day to day
basis. It is expressly clarified that a wholesale      b. Products should be sold under the same
trader cannot open retail outlets, whereby sales          brand internationally i.e. products should
will be made to the customer directly.                    be sold under the same brand in one or
                                                          more countries other than India.
Under the existing FDI Policy, wholesale deals
would be permitted among companies of the              c. ‘Single Brand’ product-retailing would
same group. However, such wholesale trade                  cover only products which are branded
to group companies taken together could not                during manufacturing.
exceed 25 percent of the total turnover of the
                                                          Any non-resident entity / entities can
wholesale venture. For the purposes of the above,
                                                          undertake SBRT in the country for
a group company as defined under the DIPP Press
                                                          a specific brand directly or through legally
Note (2 0f 2013) dated 3 June, 2013 means- two
                                                          tenable agreement with the brand owner.
or more enterprises, which directly or indirectly
                                                          Under the FDI Policy issued by the DIPP
are in a position to exercise 26 percent or more
                                                          on September 30, 2011, only the owner of
voting rights in the other enterprise, or can
                                                          the brand was permitted to invest in SBRT.
appoint more than 50 percent of members of the
                                                          This condition was seen to be restrictive
board of directors in the other enterprise.
                                                          as it ignored the IP holding structures
                                                          prevalent globally. The condition was
D. Single-Brand Product Retail                            then modified to permit only one foreign
   Trading (SBRT)                                         investor whether owner of the brand
                                                          directly or a licensee / franchisee / sub-
                                                          licensee to invest in SBRT in the country,
FDI up to 100 percent in SBRT is allowed subject
                                                          for the specific brand for which approval
to certain conditions. No Government approval
                                                          is being sought through a legally tenable
is required for FDI in SBRT.
                                                          agreement with the brand owner. The
                                                          onus for ensuring compliance with this
                                                          condition rested with the Indian entity
                                                          carrying out SBRT in India.
     d. Moreover, the government also may relax                        50 million (approx. USD 712,600) and INR
         sourcing norms for entities undertaking                       100 million (approx. USD 1.4 million).
         SBRT of products having ‘state-of-art’ and                    One of the changes also introduced in
        ‘cutting-edge’ technology and where local                      the FDI reforms is on this local sourcing
         sourcing is not possible.                                     requirement, which provides the retail
        This condition was still seen as restrictive                   trading entity having FDI beyond
        and with the recent change, the requirement                    51 percent with an option to set off its
        has been significantly diluted by allowing                     incremental sourcing of goods from
        one or more non-resident entities to                           India for its global operations, against
        undertake SBRT of a specific brand provided                    the mandatory 30 percent domestic
        they are owner of the brand or they have                       sourcing of goods requirement. Goods
        some agreement with the brand owner for                        sourced globally from India by the group
        the specific brand. This will be helpful for                   companies of the retail trading entity
        structures where for example, more than                        would also be considered for the purpose
        one foreign entity has been provided with                      of availing this set off against the 30
        a license for a territory or where the owner                   percent local sourcing requirement.
        and a licensee both invest.                               g. Retail trading, in any form, by means of
                                                                     e-commerce, would not be permissible,
     e. Furthermore, entities operating through
                                                                     for companies with FDI, engaged in the
        brick and mortar stores are permitted
                                                                     activity of SBRT.
        to undertake retail trading through
        e-commerce as well.
                                                                E. Multi- Brand Product Retail
     f. In respect of proposals involving FDI                      Trading (MBRT)
         beyond 51 percent, mandatory sourcing
         of at least 30 percent of the value of goods
                                                                FDI up to 51 percent in MBRT is allowed
         purchased, must be done from India,
                                                                under the Government route i.e. with the prior
         preferably from MSMEs,27 village and
                                                                approval of the DIPP subject to compliance of
         cottage industries, artisans and craftsmen,
                                                                certain conditions.28 The current policy does not
         in all sectors. The local procurement
                                                                define the term ‘multi brand’. MBRT generally
         requirement would have to be met as an
                                                                implies the sale of multiple brands to retail
         average of five years’ total value of the
                                                                customers for personal consumption.
         goods purchased, beginning April 1 of the
         year during which the first tranche of FDI             The proposal to allow FDI in MBRT dates back
         is received. Thereafter, this requirement is           to July 2010, when DIPP first introduced its
         to be complied on an annual basis. MSMEs’              discussion paper (“Discussion paper on FDI in
         should be as defined and described under:              retail”) on allowing FDI in MBRT. The proposal
         The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises                of allowing FDI in MBRT was approved by the
         Development Act, 2006. ‘Micro’ enterprises             Cabinet in November 2011. However, due to
         are those that have total investment in                adverse political backlash, the proposal was kept
         plant and machinery less than INR 2.5                  on hold.
         million (approx. USD 35,630); Small
                                                                There was tremendous international pressure
         enterprises having between INR 2.5
                                                                on the Government to open up the multi-
         million (approx. USD 35,630) and INR
                                                                brand retails sector for FDI, as well as pressure
         50 million (approx. USD 712,600); and
                                                                domestically to end the stalemate of policy
        ‘Medium’ enterprises having between INR
                                                                inaction. The Government has risen from its
27. The word MSMEs is not defined in FDI Policy. However, the
    same has also being used in provisions relating to FDI in   28. Notified by DIPP by way of Press Note 5 (2012 Series) dated
    MBRT.                                                           September 20, 2012.
state of policy inaction and tried to establish a reformist image by allowing FDI in MBRT.
As a result, the DIPP by way of Press Note 5 (2012 Series) allowed 51 percent FDI in MBRT under
Government approval route subject to the following conditions:
Retail sales outlets may be set up in those States which have agreed or agree in future to allow
  FDI in MBRT
Under List II of Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, trade and commerce within a State is a State
subject. A regulatory framework governing retail sector, consequently, needs the approval of States under
the Constitution.
States that have enabled FDI in MBRT:
Further, it has been recently clarified by DIPP         this condition was amended by way of Press
that if the foreign investor approaches a State         Note 5 (2013 Series).30
Government not included in the list of states
                                                        While, the previous restriction to Tier 1 and Tier
supporting FDI in MBRT, consent from the State
                                                        2 cities seemed reasonable given the sensitivity
Government would be sufficient, and a suitable
                                                        around the sector and prevalent undeveloped
amendment to the policy will be issued by the
                                                        / unorganised retail segment in small towns/
Central Government.
                                                        villages which would be unable to compete with
Accordingly, it would be the prerogative                large players, the recent change to allow State
of the State Governments to decide whether              Governments to determine the cities in which
and where a multi-brand retailer, with FDI,             retail outlets can be set up will also ensure that
is permitted to establish its sales outlets within      every State Government has the discretion
the State. The establishment of the retail sales        to choose the cities in which multi-brand
outlets will have to be in compliance with              retail outlets are set up and provide a sense of
applicable State laws/ regulations, such as the         uniformity amongst the States.
Shops and Establishments Act etc. Additionally,
                                                        Minimum amount to be brought in, as FDI,
the companies engaged in MBRT will also
                                                          by the foreign investor, would be USD 100
have to comply with local zoning regulations,
                                                          million.
warehousing requirements, access, traffic,
parking and other logistics as prescribed by State      The foreign investor has to bring in a minimum
Governments from time to time.                          investment of USD 100 million in an entity
                                                        engaged in MBRT.
With this restriction, each investor will have to
comply with policy on FDI at both Centre and            Retail sector being a capital-intensive sector, the
State levels. Depending on State policy on MBRT,        requirement for minimum capitalisation appears
the investors may or may not be permitted to            logical. This will attract serious investors and
invest in those States. Interestingly this seems        allow the government to study the benefit such
to be the first time that discretion on whether         investment will have on the Indian economy.
to permit FDI in a sector or not has been left to
                                                        50 percent of total FDI brought in to be
the States.
                                                          invested in b
                                                                      ` ackend infrastructure` within
Retail sales locations may be set up only in            three years
  certain cities
                                                        Considering the need for investment in
The reach of retail sales outlets of foreign multi      back end infrastructure, at least 50 percent
brand retail trader will be limited to only those       of the USD 100 million i.e. total FDI brought
cities with a population of more than 10 lakh as        in in the first tranche 31 shall be invested
per the 2011 Census or any other cities as per the      in ‘back-end infrastructure’ within three
decision of the respective State Governments            years. Any subsequent investment in backend
(including an area of 10 kilometers around the          infrastructure would be made by the MBRT
municipal/urban agglomeration limits of such            retailer as needed, depending upon his business
cities). Previously, the FDI Policy provided that       requirements. Investment in ‘back-end
retail outlets could only be set up in cities with
a minimum population of 10 lakhs, however
                                                        30. As clarified by Press Note 5 (2013 series), available at: http://
                                                            dipp.nic.in/sites/default/files/pn5_2013_1.pdf
                                                        31. As clarified by Press Note 5 (2013 series), available at: http://
29. As per the 2011 India census                            dipp.nic.in/sites/default/files/pn5_2013_1.pdf
infrastructure’ will include capital expenditure                      This procurement requirement would have
on all activities such as investment made                             to be met, in the first instance, as an average
towards processing, manufacturing, distribution,                      of five years’ total value of the manufactured/
design improvement, quality control, packaging,                       processed products purchased, beginning April 1
logistics, storage, warehouse, agriculture                            of the year during which the first tranche of FDI
market produce infrastructure etc. Expenditure                        is received. Thereafter, it would have to be met
incurred on front-end units, land cost and                            on an annual basis.
rentals will not be reckoned for purposes of
                                                                      In case of MBRT, the 30 percent sourcing
backend investment.
                                                                      requirement is to be calculated on the purchase
The Indian retail sector is lacking adequate                          of manufactured and processed products and
infrastructure and immersed in increased cost                         sourcing from agricultural co-operatives and
and wastage due to disrupted supply chains                            farmers co-operatives would also be considered.
and middlemen. To address this problem,                               The mandatory local sourcing requirement in
the requirement for investment in back end                            case of MBRT is aimed to provide a boost to
infrastructure within a three year timeframe                          small industries. It may be easier for multi brand
has been introduced. Compliance for the FDI                           retailers to meet this condition since they have
amount invested in back-end infrastructure                            a large spectrum of goods to offer.
to be self-certified and checked by statutory
                                                                      Retail trading, in any form, by means of
auditors and submitted to the DIPP in the
                                                                        e-commerce, would not be permissible, for
prescribed form.
                                                                        companies with FDI, engaged in the activ-
30 percent mandatory local sourcing                                   ity of MBRT.
  requirement
                                                                      Company which is recipient of FDI has to
Similar to the requirement of mandatory local                         ensure compliance of the conditions relating
sourcing as applicable in SBRT (prior to press                        to minimum USD 100 million investment,
note 4 of 2012), at least 30 percent of the value                     investment in back- end infrastructure and
of procurement of manufactured/ processed                             mandatory local procurement requirement
products purchased shall be sourced locally.                          which could be verified, as and when required.
Such sourcing was earlier limited to ‘small                           Further, the investors shall maintain accounts,
industries’ which have a total investment in plant                    duly certified by statutory auditors.
and machinery not exceeding USD 1 million.
                                                                      However, the Indian Ministry of Finance has
This requirement has now been amended via
                                                                      proposed to reduce the corporate tax rate from
Press Note 5 (2013 Series)32 and investors are
                                                                      30 percent to 25 percent over a period of four
permitted to source such products from micro,
                                                                      years with a view to encourage foreign investors
small and medium industries which have
                                                                      to ‘Make in India’. Alongside, the ministry
a total investment in plant and machinery not
                                                                      has also made a move to reduce the rates of
exceeding USD 2 million. The amendment
                                                                      withholding taxes for royalties and fees for
further clarifies that such ‘small industry’ status
                                                                      technical services provided by non-residents
is only considered at the time of first engagement
                                                                      to 10 percent which would further incentivize
and that such industry will continue to qualify
                                                                      foreign companies to set up manufacturing
as a ‘small industry’ for this purpose even if it
                                                                      bases in India. It should be noted that FDI in
outgrows the said investment of USD 2 million.
                                                                      B2C e-commerce is permitted in circumstances
Compliance with this condition will have to
                                                                      where a manufacturer is permitted to sell its
be self-certified by the company and then cross-
                                                                      single-brand products manufactured in India
checked as and when required.
                                                                      through e-commerce retail.
Applications for MBRT would be have                                   In effect, a foreign investor will have to be
to be made to DIPP. DIPP will determine                               mindful of the local rules and regulations of
whether the proposed investment satisfies                             each State before finalizing the transaction
the notified guidelines and after being satisfied                     structure / business model, especially when the
will forward the application to be considered                         investor intends to set up outlets in all the States.
by the FIPB for approval.                                             Further, for the existing entities operating across
                                                                      India, it would be difficult to get FDI in entity
Further, DIPP came out with certain
                                                                      without restructuring of its operations.
clarifications on queries raised by prospective
investors with respect to the precision on MBRT
under the FDI Policy.33                                               ii. India’s commitments under
                                                                           international investment
F. Challenges moving forward                                               agreements / treaties
                                                                      India is a signatory to various international
While the policy framework in relation
                                                                      trade agreements / treaties like the General
to FDI in MBRT is now put in place, the
                                                                      Agreement on Trade in Services, Trade Related
implementation of this policy framework is
                                                                      Investment Measures, bilateral investment
bound to have certain challenges. Some of
                                                                      protection agreements 34, and comprehensive
which include:
                                                                      economic cooperation agreements in the field
                                                                      of trade and economic affairs signed to promote
i. Implementation at State level                                      investment inflow. While the Government in
 Retail is the only sector where that FDI                             its press release 35 has categorically concluded
 policy is introduced as an enabling policy                           that the policy framework does not violate
 and implementation of the same is left to the                        any commitments or obligations arising
 discretion of the State Governments / Union                          out of India’s international agreements, the
 Territories. This draws support from the fact that                   introduction of FDI in SBRT and MBRT with
‘trade and commerce within the State’ is a State                      conditions such as domestic sourcing and state
 subject under the Constitution of India. Such                        wise implementation has raised a few questions
 a policy may give unrestricted powers to the                         with respect to India’s commitments under
 State Government / Union Territories to impose                       these treaties and agreements.
 conditions in addition to those prescribed by the
 DIPP. State level regulations could also lead to
 an inconsistent policy framework which will
                                                                      iii. Options available with investors
 need to be carefully understood and followed                              if the Government retroactively
 by potential investors. There is also the risk of                         changes its policy in the future
 a State Government changing its policy on
                                                                      While the Government has the right to enact,
 MBRT and reversing earlier decisions, especially
                                                                      modify or repeal a law/policy at its own
 in the event of a change in political power as
                                                                      discretion in its sovereign capacity, a foreign
 this scenario has not been construed by the DIPP
                                                                      investor expects the host country to act in
 in the Press Note.
                                                                      a consistent manner, so that it may know
treaty. For example: when the interest is paid      under Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act.
by Indian company to U.S. corporation, the          Further, in cases where the gross receipts or
otherwise applicable Indian withholding tax,        turnover are received through banking channels,
reduced to 15 percent under the India-U.S.          a 6 percent presumptive rate of tax, instead of 8
income tax treaty.                                  percent, is applicable.
                                                    Domestic resident companies in India are taxed
IV. Tax laws                                        at 30 percent and at 25 percent if the turnover
                                                    or gross receipts do not exceed INR 500 million
The levy of taxes in India is a constitutional      (approx. USD 285,160) (excluding surcharge
power granted to the Union Government and           and cess).43 Limited Liability Partnerships
the State Governments. Each tax levied or           (“LLP”) are taxed at 30 percent irrespective of
collected has to be backed by an accompanying       turnover, however the tax benefit lies in the
law, passed either by the Parliament or the State   fact that while distributions by companies are
Legislature.                                        effective taxed at 20 percent either as dividend
                                                    or buyback tax, there are no additional taxes
                                                    on distributions by LLPs. However, operating
V. Direct Taxes                                     a retail business through investments in an
                                                    LLP would be subject to the regulatory and FDI
A. Income Tax                                       regime described above in this paper.
                                                    A company is said to be resident in India if it is
Income tax in India is levied under the Income
                                                    incorporated under the laws of India or when
Tax Act, 1961 (“Income Tax Act”). India,
                                                    it’s Place of Effective Management (“POEM”)
in terms of direct taxes (Income tax) follows
                                                    is in India.44 POEM has both an objective and
a system of progressive taxation wherein the
                                                    a subjective element. Should the objective
rate of taxation increases as the income bracket
                                                    critieria be met, then it is presumed that the
increases. India follows a blend of source and
                                                    POEM of the company is outside India if the
residence bases of taxing income.
                                                    majority of the board meetings are conducted
In broad terms, profits earned from any trade       outside India. Please note that for this purpose,
would be taxed under the ITA under the              the objective criteria would include looking
head of income “profits and gains of business       at factors such as where the majority of the
and profession.” Therefore, the income from         employees are located, the proportion of
profits and gains from retail trade are similarly   passive income such as dividends, interest or
computed in the way provided for under this         royalties and the proportion of salary expenses
head of income.                                     to personnel in India. Should the objective
                                                    test not be met, then the POEM of a company
However, small business carried on by an
                                                    is the place where the key management and
individual, Hindu undivided family and
                                                    commercial decisions that are necessary for
partnership who are residents and whose total
                                                    the conduct of the business of an entity are, in
turnover or gross receipts do not exceed INR 20
                                                    substance made. This test however, remains
million (approx. USD 285,160) have the option
                                                    substantially subjective and is decided on a case
of being presumptively taxed at a rate of 8
                                                    to case basis. The Central Board of Direct Taxes
percent of the total turnover or gross receipts
                                                    (“CBDT”) has however clarified that provisions
                                                    relating to POEM would not apply to companies
having turnover or gross receipts less than INR                     Under Section 115-O of the Income Tax Act,
500 million (approx. USD 7.13 million) during                       an Indian company is required to pay dividend
a financial year.45                                                 distribution tax (“DDT”) at the rate of 15
                                                                    percent (excluding surcharge and cess) on
Foreign companies (which are not POEM
                                                                    dividends that are declared, distributed or paid
resident) in India are taxed at 40 percent
                                                                    by a domestic company. However, no further
(excluding surcharge and cess) with
                                                                    taxes are payable in India on such dividend
a disallowance of expenses.46 These companies
                                                                    income in the hands of the shareholders once
are however taxed in India only to the extent
                                                                    DDT is paid by the company.
the income is sourced from India. Under
Section 9 of the ITA, income arising from                           When exiting, or restructuring of business
a ‘business connection’ in India is deemed                          wherein sale of assets held by the company
to be sourced in India. Business connection                         takes place, capital gains tax is payable at a rate
is a concept based on the source theory of                          of up to 40 percent (excluding surcharge and
taxation to justify the source country’s right to                   cess) contingent on whether the capital gains
tax income arising from activities carried out                      are long term or short term. India also contains
in that country provided certain prescribed                         provisions for levying capital gains tax on
nexus thresholds are satisfied. The definition                      the indirect transfer of assets whereby tax is
of business connection was further expanded                         levied on the transfer of assets situated outside
by the Finance Act, 2018 with the introduction                      India, when such assets derive substantially
of the new concept of Significant Economic                          their value from assets in India.48 Certain
Presence (“SEP”), the presence of which would                       types of payments in India require the payer
constitute a business connection. The definition                    to withhold tax as ‘tax deducted at source’.
of SEP has been provided to mean transactions                       However, there remain many nagging issues
in respect of goods, services or property carried                   with respect to these taxes. Minimum alternate
out by a non-resident in India if the aggregate                     tax (“MAT”) at 18.5 percent is also payable on
payments arising from such transactions                             the book profits of a company, if the company’s
exceed a prescribed amount. It also includes the                    income due to exemptions is less than 18.5
systematic and continuous soliciting of business                    percent of its book profits.49
activities or engaging in interaction with such
                                                                    Moreover, for foreign companies which
number of users in India, through digital means
                                                                    provide digital advertising or related services
as may be prescribed.47 Considering the wide
                                                                    to their Indian counterparties, carrying on
definition of SEP, foreign companies conducting
                                                                    retail trade in India, an additional tax in the
business of selling products in India would be
                                                                    form of ‘Equalization Levy’ (“EL”) may become
considered as having a business connection in
                                                                    payable in India. The EL was introduced in
India and thus taxed on the profits attributable
                                                                    2016 as a response to new business models
to India. Further, ecommerce activities which
                                                                    which operated in jurisdictions with little or
involve interaction with Indian users through
                                                                    no physical presence. New set of tax challenges
digital means may also fall under this definition.
                                                                    arose with such models, with difficulties in
However, it is to be noted that the thresholds
                                                                    determining where the income generated
to determine SEP have yet not been notified.
                                                                    should be taxed particularly with respect to
However, it is expected that the same shall be
                                                                    nexus, characterization, valuation of data and
soon notified by the CBDT.
                                                                    user contribution. The EL is a 6 percent tax that
                                                                    is to be paid by the resident service recipient
45. Central Board of Direct Taxes, Circular No. 08 of 2017, dated   on payments made to a non-resident service
    23rd February, 2017.                                            provider for provision of online advertisement
46. Surcharge is applicable @ 2%if the total income is in excess
    of INR 10 million and 5% where the total income is in excess
    of INR 100 million. Education cess is applicable @ 3% on
    income tax (inclusive of surcharge, if any).                    48. Explanation 5, Section 9(1)(i), ITA
47. Explanation 2A, Section 9(1)(i), ITA                            49. Section 115JB, ITA
or digital advertising space or facilities for         in general based on the doctrine of ‘substance
the purposes of online advertisement, when             over form’. India has also introduced wide GAAR
the aggregate consideration is more than               provisions which provide broad powers to the
INR 100,000 (approx. USD 1,425) in a year.             Indian tax authorities to deny tax benefits by
Further, EL has been deliberately kept outside         characterizing arrangements as ‘impermissible
the purview of India’s income tax regime               avoidance arrangements’ if the main purpose
and consequently, the government has taken             of a transaction is to avoid the payment of
the position that tax treaty relief should not         taxes. GAAR has come into effect from April
be available. As a consequence, countries of           1, 2017 in India. The GAAR provisions in India
residence of the foreign service providers could       include the power to disregard entities in a
potentially refuse to grant tax credits against        structure, reallocate income and expenditure
the EL paid in India thereby leading to double         between parties to the arrangement, alter the
taxation. It is also possible that this regime could   tax residence of such entities and the legal situs
be significantly expanded in the future to cover       of assets involved, look through an arrangement
most cross-border digital services. In any event,      by disregarding any corporate structure, treat
such services should already be subject to GST,        debt as equity and vice versa, and the like.50 Such
in which case the EL would be an additional            wide discretionary powers gives much room for
levy on top of that.                                   misuse of ambiguous expressions while defining
                                                       an impermissible avoidance arrangement., which
Separately, recently tax authorities have
                                                       includes terms such as misuse, abuse, bona
challenged the deep discounting model in
                                                       fide purpose, and commercial substance of
e-commerce by seeking to categorize advertising
                                                       arrangements.51 Further, arrangements lacking
expenses as capital expenses instead of business
                                                       commercial substance are deemed to include
expenses. While the Karnataka High Court has
                                                       amongst others, round trip financing, elements
remanded the matter back to the tax officer for
                                                       that have the effect of offsetting or cancelling each
re-assessment, the final word on this issue is not
                                                       other, and arrangements not having a significant
out yet, despite several rulings in the past on
                                                       effect upon business risks or net cash flows other
categorization of advertising expenses.
                                                       than in relation to tax benefits.52 Even investing
                                                       though an intermediate jurisdiction into India
B. General anti-avoidance rules                        could potentially trigger GAAR. Thus, there exists
   (“GAAR”)                                            a possibility of a wider interpretation given to
                                                       such subjective terms, leading to a large number
                                                       of transactions coming under the scrutiny of the
Anti-avoidance rules are introduced by countries
                                                       tax authorities. In effect, there arise two main
as a tool for checking aggressive tax planning
                                                       concerns - lack of clarity in how these provisions
by businesses that enter into arrangements
                                                       would be applied and the wide discretionary
and transactions with the objective of avoiding
                                                       power conferred on the revenue authorities.
tax. Specific Anti-Avoidance Rules (“SAAR”)
are made applicable to particular scenarios and        Further, the Central Board of Direct Taxes
arrangements. This includes transfer pricing           (“CBDT”) has clarified that GAAR and SAAR
regulations which tax transactions between             can coexist and applied as and when necessary
group companies on an arm’s length basis.              as per the facts of the situation. It has even laid
These regulations have been explained in the           down that anti-abuse rules in tax treaties may
section below.                                         not be sufficient to address all tax avoidance
                                                       strategies and therefore domestic anti-avoidance
General Anti-Avoidance Rules (“GAAR”) on
                                                       rules should be applied. However, it has been
the other hand empower tax authorities to deny
transactions or arrangements which do not have
any commercial substance or consideration              50. Section 98, ITA.
other than achieving tax benefits. Thus, GAAR          51. Section 96, ITA
are rules which check potential avoidance of tax       52. Section 97, ITA
noted that if avoidance is sufficiently addressed                   Pricing Agreements (“APA”). An APA brings tax
by Limitation of Benefits clauses in treaties,                      certainty by being an ahead-of-time agreement
i.e. clauses which limit treaty benefits to those                   between the taxpayer and the tax authorities,
persons who meet certain conditions, GAAR                           whereby the transfer price for future years is
would not apply.53                                                  determined in advance. An APA is valid for
                                                                    a period of maximum of 5 years and the APA
Moreover, investments made prior to March
                                                                    would be binding only on the taxpayer and the
31, 2017 are grandfathered in and GAAR applies
                                                                    concerned commissioner and his subordinates.
only prospectively, i.e. to investments made
                                                                    If however there is a change in law or a fact post
after April 1, 2017.
                                                                    the execution of the APA, the APA shall cease to
                                                                    be valid from the date of such change. Further,
C. Transfer Pricing Framework                                       the Central Board of Direct Taxes is empowered
                                                                    to declare any APA as invalid (void ab initio) if it
i. International Transfer Pricing                                   finds that the APA has been obtained by fraud or
                                                                    misrepresentation of facts.
Commercial transactions between related
entities of multinational corporations
increasingly dominate the sphere of world
                                                                    ii. Domestic Transfer Pricing
trade. The pricing of these transactions between
                                                                    The ITA also contains specific domestic transfer
related parties, which is known as ‘transfer
                                                                    pricing provisions. It is provided that if the
pricing’, may differ from those that take
                                                                    domestic transactions between two related
place between unrelated parties. In India, the
                                                                    persons or two units of the same entity exceed
transfer pricing regulations (“Regulations”) are
                                                                    INR 200 million (USD 2.85 million), then
contained in sections 92 to 92F of the Income
                                                                    in order to determine the correctness of the
Tax Act. The Regulations provide for a transfer
                                                                    income from domestic related party transaction,
pricing mechanism based on computation of
                                                                    the transfer pricing regulations (including
income arising out of cross-border transactions
                                                                    procedural and penal provisions) would be
having regard to the arm’s length price (“ALP”).
                                                                    extended to such domestic transactions as well.
The ALP as codified in the Regulations has
its roots in the Organization for Economic                          While the rationale for these provisions is
Co-operation and Development (“OECD”)                               under-standable, it no doubt increases the
Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational                       compliance burden of many a corporate tax
Enterprises and Tax Administrations. The “ALP”                      payer. One significant issue that arises is that
is defined to mean a price, at which transactions                   while the APA regime has been introduced
between persons other than associated                               with respect to international transactions, the
enterprises, in uncon-trolled circumstances are                     same benefit has not been extended in cases of
carried out.                                                        domestic transactions.
The Act stipulates stringent penalties for non-                     Moreover, ‘safe harbor rules’ have been notified
compliance with transfer pricing provisions.                        in September 2013, with the aim of providing
Presently, all enterprises having a turnover                        more certainty to taxpayers and to address the
greater than INR 150 million (approx. USD 3                         growing risks of transfer pricing litigation in
million) fall within the ambit of compulsory                        India, Under this regime, the tax authorities
audit by a special Transfer Pricing Officer.                        would accept the transfer price set by the
                                                                    taxpayer if the taxpayer and transaction meet
It is important to note that the Finance Act, 2012
                                                                    the eligibility criteria specified in the rules.
has introduced a regime relating to Advanced
Some basic GST terms are as follows:                             regardless of their size or the value of the
                                                                 services being supplied by them in India
     1. Taxable events: The levy of tax is on the
                                                                 in a financial year. These include foreign
       “supply” of goods or services and on imports.
                                                                 companies supplying Online Information
        The scope of supply under GST is wide
                                                                 Database Access and Retrieval services
        enough to include all forms of supply
                                                                 (“OIDAR services”) from outside India
        of goods or services or both such as sale,
                                                                 to Indian consumers or to non- registered
        transfer, barter, exchange, license, lease or
                                                                 businesses in India, non-resident taxable
        disposal made or agreed to be made for a
                                                                 persons, persons making supply on behalf
        consideration by a person in the course or
                                                                 of other registered taxable persons, persons
        furtherance of business. The term supply
                                                                 making supply (except of branded services)
        includes the following three elements:
                                                                 through e-commerce operators and e-com-
        a. Place of Supply: The place of supply                  merce operators.
           of goods or services determines the
                                                            3. Rates: Under the GST regime, there
           governing law in relation to the
                                                               are separate provisions of tax rates for
           transaction. As discussed, if the supply
                                                               goods and services, further bifurcated
           is inter-state, the IGST law is applicable
                                                               into separate IGST, CGST, and SGST.
           whereas in case of an intra-state supply,
                                                               These notifications have seen multiple
           both CGST and SGST laws become
                                                               amendments since GST came into force.
           applicable. A cross-border supply of
           good and services crossing the Indian                 Further, supply of certain goods and
           customs frontier is subject to IGST. In               services have been designated as ‘Zero rated
           order to determine the place of supply,               supply’ of goods and services, meaning,
           the location of the recipient or that of the          although it is taxable supply, zero rate of
           supplier, importer or exporter, as the case           tax would be charged in respect to such
           may be, becomes important to determine.               supply and Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) or
                                                                 refund can be claimed. Such supplies relate
        b. Time of Supply: The time of supply
                                                                 to: (a) exports of goods or services (ii) supply
           is important to ascertain since it
                                                                 of goods or services to a Special Economic
           determines when the tax is to be levied.
                                                                 Zone developer or a unit. 54
        c. Value of Supply: GST is computed on
           the value of the supply. The value of          OIDAR Services
           supply is the transaction value in case
                                                          Similar to the service tax regime that preceded
           of transactions between unrelated
                                                          it, the GST regime also captures digital services
           parties and where price is the sole
                                                          within the definition of OIDAR services, which
           consideration.
                                                          includes services ‘whose delivery is mediated
     2. Taxable person: A taxable person is defined       by information technology over the internet or an
        under GST as a person who is either reg-          electronic network and the nature of which renders
        istered or is liable to be registered under       their supply essentially automated and involving
        the provisions of the GST laws. The CGST          minimal human intervention and impossible to
        Act requires that every supplier having           ensure in the absence of information technology.’ The
        an aggregate turnover of INR 2 million            definition further includes a list of services within
        (approx. USD 28,504) or more in a financial       the definition of OIDAR services: advertising on
        year shall register from where he makes           the internet providing cloud services; provision
        a taxable supply of goods or services.            of e-books, movie, music, software and other
        However, the threshold of INR 2 million           intangibles through telecommunication
        (approx. USD 28,504) is not applicable            networks or internet; providing data or
        to certain classes of persons who are
        required to register under the GST regime
                                                          54. Section 16(1), IGST Act
information, retrievable or otherwise, to any                      and the Government should provide the
person in electronic form through a computer                       necessary clarifications / amendments to
network; online supplies of digital content                        address the above issues. However, it is
(movies, television shows, music and the like);                    understood that the tax authorities are enforcing
digital data storage; and online gaming.55                         registration only if the company has any
                                                                   physical present or establishment in that state.
                                                                   In any case, it is expected that the GST Council
B. Ambiguities within the GST                                      will implement a single registration scheme for
   regime                                                          such digital companies in the near future.
i. Cumbersome Registration
   Regime                                                          ii. Tax Collection at Source (“TCS”)
                                                                       Obligations for E-commerce
Unlike the general provisions requiring the
supplier to register in the State from where he
                                                                       Operators
is making the supply of services 56 there is no
                                                                   GST has brought in an additional challenge of
specific provision in relation to a non- resident
                                                                   TCS on e-commerce operators as the scope of
supplier providing services outside India. This
                                                                   the definition of e-commerce operator is broad
is not only a severely cumbersome requirement
                                                                   and includes all forms of e-commerce business
for foreign multinational enterprises (“MNEs”),
                                                                   models. An e-commerce operator has been
but even more so for foreign small and medium
                                                                   defined to mean “any person who owns, operates
enterprises (“SMEs”) and start-ups accessing the
                                                                   or manages digital or electronic facility or platform
ever-growing Indian market through the internet.
                                                                   for electronic commerce”.58 Further, e-commerce
Another point of significant concern is the                        has been defined as “supply of goods or services
registration requirements under the SGST Acts                      or both, including digital products over digital or
and CGST Act wherein it is stated that                             electronic network.” 59
a supplier making a taxable supply of goods
                                                                   E-commerce operators are mandatorily
or services in a state must register in that state,
                                                                   required to collect and pay GST (by way of TCS)
whereby service suppliers may be required to
                                                                   on behalf of the suppliers at the prescribed rate
obtain an SGST registration in every state where
                                                                   on the net value of taxable supplies of goods
their customers are located.
                                                                   or services made through the operator, within
A foreseeable hindrance which the absence                          10 days from the end of the month and furnish
of an SGST registration may cause is where                         a monthly statement of outward supplies
a supplier seeks to claim input tax credit for                     for the same.60 The CGST Act further places
SGST discharged in the state other than the                        significant compliance burden on e-commerce
state where such supplier is registered. This                      operators, which in most cases are start-
is because the SGST Acts only contemplate                          ups. The Government has currently deferred
availment of input tax credit with respect to                      the applicability of the TCS obligation on
persons registered under the respective SGST                       e-commerce operators indefinitely for
Acts. 57 The registration requirement in every                     a smooth GST roll out.61 It will be a mammoth
destination state is highly onerous to business                    burden on e-commerce operators to claim
                                                                   a refund of TCS paid for the orders which have
been returned or canceled. This problem will            in different states, is treated as a ‘distinct person’
primarily arise when the return of the order            in respect of each such registration.62
takes place in the following month as it will
                                                         Under the CGST Act, this has been expanded to
not have been accounted for while determining
                                                         also cover intra-entity supply of services, and also
the ‘net taxable supplies’ and TCS would have
                                                         supplies made between voluntarily registered
accordingly been deducted and paid on it.
                                                         establishments within a state. Therefore,
Imposing such a financial and administrative             even services such as back-office functions or
burden may be considered an unreasonable                 Information Technology (“IT”) support services
restriction on the right of e-commerce operators         provided within the entity by a division or
to carry on business in India. While the TCS             branch of the entity could potentially be treated
obligations on e-commerce operators are                  as a taxable supply. In order to escape the levy of
currently deferred, it is recommended that the           GST on intra-entity support services, it could be
same be repealed as these could be harmful to            argued that the services are not provided in the
the development of e-commerce which is one of           ‘course or furtherance of business’. Having said
the cornerstones of the digital economy.                 that, this is likely to result in litigation which
                                                         could impact all enterprises having multiple
The industry has made several representations
                                                         branches in the country.
to the GST Council regarding this issue and it is
expected that this provision may be deleted or
never implemented. In the meanwhile, the GST            C. Customs Duty
Council has continuously extended the period
for which this provision shall not be implement.        In addition to GST, customs duty is a duty that
                                                        is levied on goods that are imported into India
                                                        and exported from India. Customs duty is levied
iii. Intra-entity Transactions                          by the Central Government. The Customs Act,
                                                        1962 (“Customs Act”) provides for the levy and
 The pre-GST provisions did not subject to tax
                                                        collection of duty on imports and exports, import
 the transactions within an entity as it required
                                                        / export procedures, prohibitions on importation
 a ‘registered dealer’ to be the subject of tax.
                                                        and exportation of goods, penalties, offences, etc.
 While CGST Act defines ‘person’ to include
                                                        The rates at which customs duty is levied are
 a company, the definition of ‘person’ and
                                                        specified in the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. While
‘supplier’ should not include a division or unit
                                                        export duties are levied occasionally to mop up
 of a company. A clarification issued by the
                                                        excess profitability in international prices of
 Central Board for Excise and Customs (“CBEC”)
                                                        goods in respect of which domestic prices may
 provides that ‘an unregistered person who is liable
                                                        be low at the given time, levy of import duties
 to be registered is a taxable person’. Consequently,
                                                        is quite wide. Prior to the introduction of GST in
 it is a moot point on how tax authorities would
                                                        India, import duties were generally categorized
 treat large entities which provide services
                                                        into basic customs duty, additional customs
 within the entity or engage in branch transfers.
                                                        duties, countervailing duty, safeguard duty and
 This, coupled with the reiteration in the CBEC
                                                        anti-dumping duty. With the introduction of GST,
 Clarification that ‘a person making supplies
                                                        the customs framework has been significantly
 from different States needs to take separate
                                                        revamped. Import of goods is now subject to
 registration in each State’, makes compliance
                                                        IGST at the rate prescribed for inter-state supply
 onerous. The need for multiple-registrations is
                                                        of the goods concerned, in addition to basic
 reinforced when it is seen that each registered
                                                        customs duty, while most other duties have been
 establishment is treated as a separate entity
                                                        abolished, or significantly curtailed. While the
 effectively and is required to avail credit.
                                                        standard rate of customs duty for import of goods
 Therefore, a person who has obtained multiple
 registrations or is legally required to obtain
 multiple registrations, whether within a state or
                                                        62. Section 25(4), CGST Act and Schedule 1, CGST Act
is 28.84 percent (including IGST and education        Therefore, retailers will have to be mindful
cess), the actual rate may vary according to the      of the competition law implications while
product description.                                  entering into agreements which may be held
                                                      violative of the above principles.
VII. Competition Laws                                 Retail by e-commerce is treated at par with
                                                      other models in India; competition law and
In this section, we highlight certain issues          policy, thus, may extend to dealings on a virtual
arising from the competition regime with              platform as well.
possible implications for the retail sector.
                                                      Recently, online retailers came to the limelight
One may note that under Section 32 of the
                                                      where it was alleged that they were indulging
Competition Act, 2002 (“Competition Act”),
                                                      in unfair business practices by entering
extra territorial application is conferred on its
                                                      into exclusive agreements to sell products
provisions. This is a valid exercise of legislative
                                                      exclusively on select portals and thereby
power under the Constitution of India. This
                                                      violated competition norms by abusing their
implies that even if an agreement is entered
                                                      dominant position. However, the CCI clarified
into outside India, it can still be brought under
                                                      with its decision that such pacts need not affect
the scrutiny of the Competition Commission
                                                      competition as it does not create any entry barrier
of India (“CCI”), if it can be shown that such
                                                      for new entrants as such. Of late, there has also
agreement has an appreciable adverse effect
                                                      been growing concern that deep discount sales
on competition in India. Competition Act
                                                      launched by these e-commerce websites are anti-
in its approach, leans more towards the EU
                                                      competitive in nature although the decision from
competition jurisprudence, as against the
                                                      the CCI is still pending.
antitrust laws of the US.
Recognizing that certain investment measures                        only those who fulfill specified local content
can have trade restrictive and distorting                           requirements. Second, the decision also clarifies
effects, it states that no Member shall apply a                     the relationship between TRIMs Agreement and
measure that is prohibited by the provisions                        the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing
of General Agreement on Tariff and Trade                            Measures.
(“GATT”) Article III (national treatment)67
or Article XI (quantitative restrictions).68
Examples of inconsistent measures, as spelled
                                                                    B. Antidumping and Subsidies
out in the Annex’s Illustrative List, include                          and Coun-tervailing Measures
measures which require particular levels of
local procurement by an enterprise (local                           GATT (Article 6) allows countries to take
content requirements) or which restrict the                         action against dumping. The Anti- Dumping
volume or value of imports that an enterprise                       Agreement clarifies and expands Article 6, and
can purchase or use to an amount related to                         the two operate together. They allow countries
the level of products it exports (trade balancing                   to act in a way that would normally break the
requirements). The local content requirements                       GATT principles of binding a tariff and not
that the discussion paper raised as one among                       discriminating between trading partners —
the issues for deliberation will fall within the                    typically anti-dumping action means charging
definition of these prohib¬ited measures under                      extra import duty on the particular product
TRIMs Agreement.                                                    from the particular exporting country in order
                                                                    to bring its price closer to the “normal value” or
In this regard, it is interesting to note that the
                                                                    to remove the injury to domestic industry in the
Panel of WTO’s Dispute Resolution Body also
                                                                    importing country.70
observed in a dispute more widely known as
Indonesia-Autos that: “We recall in this context                    It provides three methods to calculate
that internal tax advantages or subsidies are                       a product’s “normal value”. The main one is
only one of many types of advantages which                          based on the price in the exporter’s domestic
may be tied to a local content requirement                          market. When this cannot be used, two
which is a principal focus of the TRIMs                             alternatives are available — the price charged by
Agreement. The TRIMs Agreement is not                               the exporter in another country, or a calculation
concerned with subsidies and internal taxes as                      based on the combination of the exporter’s
such but rather with local content requirements,                    production costs, other expenses and normal
compliance with which may be encouraged                             profit margins. The agreement also specifies
through providing any type of advantage. Nor,                       how a fair comparison can be made between the
in any case, do we see why an internal measure                      export price and what would be a normal price.71
would necessarily not govern the treatment of
                                                                    One reason why restriction on FDI in retail are
foreign investment.”69
                                                                    imposed is the potential for dumping that it
The significance of this decision, thus, is                         brings about. Generally speaking, anti-dumping
twofold. The local content requirements                             duty investigations are carried out under
do not necessarily have to be in the nature                         Sections 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975
of a restriction or a prohibition. It can also                      read with Section 9B ibid and the rules made
be an advantage or incentive, available to                          thereunder. Antidumping duties are expected
                                                                    to overcome only the problem of dumping. To
                                                                    deal with the problem of direct and indirect
67. That a member State should treat imported goods and domes-
    tically produced goods at par with each other.
68. Restrictions that limit the quantum of imported goods by
    way of a quota, for example, as opposed to imposition of non-   70. Understanding the WTO: The Agreements, Anti-dumping,
    quantitative restrictions like a customs duty or otherwise.         subsidies, safeguards: contingencies, etc. Available at: http://www.
                                                                        wto.org/english/ thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm8_e.htm. Last
69. Panel Report on Indonesia — Autos, para. 14.73, available
                                                                        accessed, August 14, 2018.
    at: http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/ booksp_e/analytic_
    index_e/trims_01_e.htm#fnt1.                                    71. Ibid.
Government subsidies there is provision for                       utilised by the overseas fulfillment op-erations
countervailing duties. In both cases injury                       and therefore tax-efficient strategies should be
and casual link must necessarily be proved.                       employed to minimise potential tax liabilities
These investigations are carried out under the                    such as royalties, fees for technical services,
amended provisions of the Customs Tariff Act,                     or income tax.
1975, and the rules made thereunder.
                                                                  A recent development of particular interest
In the same vein, care should also be exercised                   to retail franchisors is intellectual property
while promulgating export-related initiatives                     securitization that allows companies to account
for the goods that are exported out of India.72                   for intangible assets such as intellectual
When certain conditions are satisfied, such                       property, royalty and brands and realize their
export incentives can also be termed a subsidy,                   full value. In recent years, a number of large
depending on whether there is export target                       restaurant franchisors have securitized their
requirements attached to any incentive or                         brands to raise funds, including Dunkin Donuts
advantage that a person can obtain.                               and Domino’s Pizza (Domino’s).73
prevention of sexual harassment against female       used to register complaints against senders
employees at the work place has been enacted.        of UCC. The situation improved but only
The Sexual Harassment of Women at Work               marginally once the TRAI Do-Not-Disturb
Place (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal)        (DND) mobile app was launched. Overall, even
Act, 2013 (“Sexual Harassment Act”) has been         after 16 amendments; the existing regulations
made effective on April 23, 2013 by way of           failed to curb the problem of unsolicited
publication in the Gazette of India.                 commercial communications (UCC). Whilst
                                                     the new regulations provided a code of
It is also important to note the recent move of
                                                     conduct, access providers were free to form
the Cabinet to introduce a new model law that
                                                     their own codes of practices to procedurally
would allow malls, cinema halls, restaurants,
                                                     and operationally implement the provisions
shops, banks and other workplaces to be open
                                                     of the draft regulations. Further, although the
24/7 for 365 days a year. The interplay of this
                                                     draft regulations were technology-centric, costs
move with the current labour and employment
                                                     involved in implementation should not be
laws would be an interesting exercise as this
                                                     exorbitant.
would also bring e-commerce companies under
the labour law rulebooks. However, the Cabinet         i. for transaction-related communications –
notes that with the flexibility available to              there is an implied / inferred consent taken
retailers to open their establishments 24/7,              from the subscriber, and
it will not only add thousands of additional skill
                                                       ii. for promotional communications – if the
jobs but also make the retail markets across the
                                                           subscriber is not registered on DND, then
country very vibrant.
                                                           such communications may be sent by the
                                                           telemarketer. If the subscriber is registered
XI. Telecom and Information                                on the DND, then explicit consent is
    Technology Laws                                        required to be taken from the subscriber.
E-commerce companies that encourage online             The Prime Minister on October 26, 2017
payments for goods and services are required           announced that the Government of India is
to be compliant of the PSS Act and regulations         working on a revised consumer protection law.
issued in this regard.                                 This announcement was not made in isolation
                                                       but in fact was done as part of his address at
The use of gift cards, e-wallets, pre-loadable
                                                       The International Conference on Consumer
cards and other forms of pre-paid instruments
                                                       Protection for East, South & South-East
are governed under the RBI Master Direction
                                                       Countries. The revision in law has been on the
on Issuance and Operation of Prepaid Payment
                                                       cards for a while, hence on the occasion of the
Instruments dated October 11, 2017.
                                                       abovementioned conference the PM seems to
                                                       have reiterated the fact.
XIII. Consumer Protection                              Later, a Consumer Protection Bill, 2018 was
      Laws                                             tabled before parliament. The Bill also imposes
                                                       a penalty on anyone who “publishes, or is a party
 It is important to keep in mind consumer              to the publication of an advertisement” of food
 protection issues. In India the Consumer              products liable for penalty if such advertisement
 Protection Act 1986 (“CPA”) governs the               is misleading or falsely describes such a food
 relationship between consumers and service/           article. We need to examine how the safe
 goods providers. There is no separate consumer        harbour available to Intermediaries under the
 protection law that is specific to and regulates      Information Technology Act continues to apply.
 online transactions. Liability under the CPA
 arises when there is “deficiency in service” or       Additionally, a term ‘unfair contract’ has also
“defect in goods” or occurrence of “unfair trade       been inserted which states that contracts which
 practice”. The CPA specifically excludes from its     require ‘… (v) prohibiting contract relating to
 ambit the rendering of any service that is free       terms permitting or having the effect of permitting
 of charge. If actual sales are taking place on the    one party to assign the contract to the detriment of
 online platform, the users will be considered         the other party without that other party’s consent;
‘consumers’ under the CPA and its provision            or (vi) imposes unreasonable charge, obligation
 will apply to the sale of products by the online      or conditions on consumers.’ – Therefore, terms
 platform. Depending upon who is actually              such as unilateral right to update T&Cs, blanket
 selling the goods or rendering services the           consent, arbitration clauses etc. included
 liability may trigger. The distributor of goods       in terms of use would therefore need to be
 also comes within the purview of the CPA.             evaluated in this light.
There is a special adjudicating forum (with
appellate forums) which is constituted under           XIV. Miscellaneous
the CPA. Some of the various sanctions which
may be imposed under the CPA are as below:             Multiple laws and regulations are in force at
                                                       the central, state and local levels for governing
     i. Removal of defects / deficiencies
                                                       the retail sector. There are various laws such
     ii. Replacement of goods                          as the Consumer Protection Act, Essential
                                                       Commodities Act, the Cold Storage Order,
     iii. Return of price paid;
                                                       the Weights & Measures Act, the Shops
     iv. Pay compensation as may be awarded;           Establishments Acts, code of advertising, local
                                                       labor laws that may become applicable to retail
     v. discontinue the unfair trade practice or the
                                                       sector depending on the kind of business the
        restrictive trade practice or not to repeat
                                                       entity is engaged in.
        them;
Structure 1
Franchisor
Master franchisee
Sub-franchise agreement
Structure 2
Franchisor
Under the master franchise structure,                        Further, from an exchange control perspective,
a multinational company i.e. franchisor                      in an international franchise arrangement
will typically enter into a master franchise                 between an Indian resident and a non-resident,
agreement for a particular territory with the                remittance for purchase/ use of trademark/
counterpart in effect allowing the master                    franchise is freely permitted.76 Further,
franchisee to sub-franchise the rights to local              withdrawal of foreign exchange by persons for
franchisee in that particular jurisdiction.                  payment of royalty and lump-sum payment
                                                             under technical collaboration agreements can
Under the second structure, the franchisor
                                                             be made without the approval of Ministry of
directly enters into franchise agreement with
                                                             Commerce and Industry, Government of India.77
local area franchisee unlike the master franchise
structure.
While the concept of franchising seems simple,
                                                             II. Strategic Licensing
there are several issues that must be dealt with                 Agreements
before entering into a franchising arrangement.
For example: In a franchising arrangement, the               Under the strategic licensing arrangement,
issues with respect to enforceability of franchise           an international retailer licenses distribution
agreement, protection of intellectual property               rights to Indian companies. Through these
rights of the franchisor / owner, constitution of            rights, Indian companies can either sell it
agency and issues under applicable anti-trust                through their own stores, or enter into shop-in-
laws must be kept in mind.                                   shop arrangements or distribute the brands to
                                                             franchisees. The diagrammatic representation
                                                             of the structure is given below:
                                            International retailer
                          Overseas
                                                                   Distribution agreement
                          India
                                              Indian company
                                                             76. Vide Press Note No. 8 (2009 Series), dated December 16, 2009
                                                             77. Vide RBI/2009-10/465 A. P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 52 dated
                                                                 May 13,. 2010
                                                     Multinational parent
                                  Overseas                company
                                                                                    100%
                                                                                    100%
                                                                         Foreign Investor
                                  Over
                                  Overse
                                       seas
                                         as                                          49%
                                                                                     49%
                                  India
                                              Indian         51%
                                                             51 %
                                                                      Operating Holding Co.
                                            Promoters                    (Indian owned
                                          & shareholders                  & controlled)
                                                                                     100%
                                                                                     100%
Retail Co.
78. The definition of ‘control’ was recently amended by way of Press Note 4 (2013 Series) and now reads as follows: ‘Control’ shall include
    the right to appoint a majority of the directors or to control the management or policy decisions including by virtue of their share-
    holding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting agreements.” Available at: http://dipp.nic.in/English/acts_rules/
    Press_Notes/pn4_2013.pdf .
However, it is possible, that the regulator may     As per the FDI Policy, marketplace based
take a different view on this structure. This is    model of e-commerce means providing of
because the downstream investment is in a           an information technology platform by an
subsidiary that is engaged in business falling in   e-commerce entity on a digital & electronic
a restricted sector and the regulator may view      network to act as a facilitator between buyer
the proposed structure as not aligned with          and seller.
the sectoral caps on retail trading. One must
                                                    The main feature of this model is that the
keep this in mind when finalising investment
                                                    e-commerce firms like Flipkart, Snapdeal,
structures in retail sector.
                                                    Amazon, etc. will be providing a platform for
                                                    customers to interact with a selected number
V. Investment in Back end                           of sellers. When an individual is purchasing
   Structure                                        a product from an e-commerce retailer, he will
                                                    be actually buying it from a registered seller in
                                                    that e-commerce platform. Hence, this entity
Investment in retail sector can be made in
                                                    only provides a platform where a consumer
wholesale trading company (“WTC” or “back
                                                    meets a seller. Inventory, stock management,
end company”) in which 100 percent FDI is
                                                    logistics, etc. are not supposed to be actively
permissible under the automatic route also
                                                    done by the e-commerce firm.
engaged in back end activities. Such a WTC
can undertake transactions with a front end         As per the latest policy, 100 percent FDI under the
company (“Retail Co.”) engaged in retail            automatic route is permitted in the marketplace
trading. However, such wholesale trade made to      model of e-commerce which means that we
Retail Co. if a group company cannot exceed 25      could see a shift of most e-commerce players
percent of the total turnover of WTC.               towards adoption of this model.
Further, WTC may enter into a licensing
agreement for use of brands as well as a services   VII. Operating based on
agreement whereby WTC may provide certain                Inventory based Model
services to Retail Co.
Given the sensitivity surrounding the retail        As per the FDI Policy, inventory based model
sector in India any transaction structure that is   of e-commerce means an e-commerce activity
proposed must be mindful of the overall policy      where inventory of goods and services is owned
perspective of the Government and to that           by e-commerce entity and sold to the consumers.
extent may be exposed to a degree of regulatory     The main feature of this model is that
scrutiny.                                           the customer buys the product from the
                                                    e-commerce firm. He manages the inventory,
                                                    interfaces with customers, runs logistics and is
VI. Operating based on                              involved in every aspect of the business.
    Marketplace Model
                                                    However, the FDI Policy does not allow FDI in
                                                    this model of e-commerce. This could mean that
Marketplaces are platforms that enable a large,     e-commerce entities who run on this model start
fragmented base of buyers and sellers to discover   restructuring their business method.
price and transact with one another in an
                                                    percent Companies Act, 2013 in terms of
environment that is efficient, transparent and
                                                    restrictions on layers of subsidiary.
trusted.
4. Conclusion
The Indian retail sector has matured over          The reforms in FDI in both SBRT, MBRT and
the years but is still highly unorganized. The     further investments by joint ventures with
country’s estimated annual retail opportunity of   domestic retail players will give the industry
USD 600 billion is a great opportunity for both    a boost and have a trickle-down effect on the
domestic and international retailers.              agricultural and food sector in India.
Cumulative FDI inflow from April 2000 to
                                                   – Retail Team
December 2017 in the retail sector reached
USD 1,141 million. The country needs more
                                                   You can direct your queries, views, suggestions,
investment in the retail and allied sectors such
                                                   and comments on our research paper to
as cold chains, warehousing and logistics.
                                                   retailteam@nishithdesai.com
About NDA
At Nishith Desai Associates, we have earned the reputation of being Asia’s most Innovative Law Firm
– and the go-to specialists for companies around the world, looking to conduct businesses in India
 and for Indian companies considering business expansion abroad. In fact, we have conceptualized
 and created a state-of-the-art Blue Sky Thinking and Research Campus, Imaginarium Aligunjan, an
 international institution dedicated to designing a premeditated future with an embedded strategic
 foresight capability.
We are a research and strategy driven international firm with offices in Mumbai, Palo Alto
(Silicon Valley), Bangalore, Singapore, New Delhi, Munich, and New York. Our team comprises
of specialists who provide strategic advice on legal, regulatory, and tax related matters in an
integrated manner basis key insights carefully culled from the allied industries.
As an active participant in shaping India’s regulatory environment, we at NDA, have the expertise and
more importantly – the VISION – to navigate its complexities. Our ongoing endeavors in conducting
and facilitating original research in emerging areas of law has helped us develop unparalleled
proficiency to anticipate legal obstacles, mitigate potential risks and identify new opportunities
for our clients on a global scale. Simply put, for conglomerates looking to conduct business in the
subcontinent, NDA takes the uncertainty out of new frontiers.
As a firm of doyens, we pride ourselves in working with select clients within select verticals on
complex matters. Our forte lies in providing innovative and strategic advice in futuristic areas of
law such as those relating to Blockchain and virtual currencies, Internet of Things (IOT), Aviation,
Artificial Intelligence, Privatization of Outer Space, Drones, Robotics, Virtual Reality, Ed-Tech, Med-
Tech & Medical Devices and Nanotechnology with our key clientele comprising of marquee Fortune
500 corporations.
The firm has been consistently ranked as one of the Most Innovative Law Firms, across the globe. In
fact, NDA has been the proud recipient of the Financial Times – RSG award 4 times in a row, (2014-
2017) as the Most Innovative Indian Law Firm.
We are a trust based, non-hierarchical, democratic organization that leverages research and knowledge
to deliver extraordinary value to our clients. Datum, our unique employer proposition has been
developed into a global case study, aptly titled ‘Management by Trust in a Democratic Enterprise,’
published by John Wiley & Sons, USA.
A brief chronicle our firm’s global acclaim for its achievements and prowess through the years -
AsiaLaw 2019: Ranked ‘Outstanding’ for Technology, Labour & Employment, Private Equity,
  Regulatory and Tax
Legal 500 (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014): No. 1 for International Tax, Investment Funds and TMT
Chambers and Partners Asia Pacific (2017 – 2018): Tier 1 for Labour & Employment, Tax, TMT
IDEX Legal Awards 2015: Nishith Desai Associates won the “M&A Deal of the year”, “Best Dispute
  Management lawyer”, “Best Use of Innovation and Technology in a law firm” and “Best Dispute
  Management Firm”
Please see the last page of this paper for the most recent research papers by our experts.
Disclaimer
This report is a copy right of Nishith Desai Associates. No reader should act on the basis of any state-
ment contained herein without seeking professional advice. The authors and the firm expressly dis-
claim all and any liabilitytoanypersonwhohasreadthisreport,or otherwise, in respect of anything, and
of consequences of anything done, or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance upon the
contents of this report.
Contact
For any help or assistance please email us on ndaconnect@nishithdesai.com
or visit us at www.nishithdesai.com
The following research papers and much more are available on our Knowledge Site: www.nishithdesai.com
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   of the Indian
                                                                                                                                                          Investors                                                                                                                                                                                                Gaming Laws
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      The Curious Case
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      of the Indian
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Gambling Laws
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Legal Issues Demysitified
February 2018
                                   Corporate Social
                                                                                                                                                          Social Business      India                                                                                                                                                                               India-Inc
                                   Responsibility & Social
                                   Business Models in India                                                                                               Models in India
                                   A Legal & Tax Perspective
March 2018
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   September 2014
     © Copyright 2018 Nishith Desai Associates                                                                                     www.nishithdesai.com
                                                                                                                                                                               September 2018
                                                                                                                                                          January 2017                                                                                                                                                                                             March 2018
NDA Insights
TITLE                                                                                                                                                                                                TYPE                                                                                                                                                                  DATE
Blackstone’s Boldest Bet in India                                                                                                                                                                    M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2017
Foreign Investment Into Indian Special Situation Assets                                                                                                                                              M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                     November 2016
Recent Learnings from Deal Making in India                                                                                                                                                           M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                          June 2016
ING Vysya - Kotak Bank : Rising M&As in Banking Sector                                                                                                                                               M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2016
Cairn – Vedanta : ‘Fair’ or Socializing Vedanta’s Debt?                                                                                                                                              M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2016
Reliance – Pipavav : Anil Ambani scoops Pipavav Defence                                                                                                                                              M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2016
Sun Pharma – Ranbaxy: A Panacea for Ranbaxy’s ills?                                                                                                                                                  M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2015
Reliance – Network18: Reliance tunes into Network18!                                                                                                                                                 M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2015
Thomas Cook – Sterling Holiday: Let’s Holiday Together!                                                                                                                                              M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2015
Jet Etihad Jet Gets a Co-Pilot                                                                                                                                                                       M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                           May 2014
Apollo’s Bumpy Ride in Pursuit of Cooper                                                                                                                                                             M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                           May 2014
Diageo-USL- ‘King of Good Times; Hands over Crown Jewel to Diageo M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              May 2014
Copyright Amendment Bill 2012 receives Indian Parliament’s assent                                                                                                                                    IP Lab                                                                                                                                                      September 2013
Public M&A’s in India: Takeover Code Dissected                                                                                                                                                       M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                        August 2013
File Foreign Application Prosecution History With Indian Patent
                                                                                                                                                                                                     IP Lab                                                                                                                                                           April 2013
Office
Warburg - Future Capital - Deal Dissected                                                                                                                                                            M&A Lab                                                                                                                                                       January 2013
Real Financing - Onshore and Offshore Debt Funding Realty in India                                                                                                                                   Realty Check                                                                                                                                                      May 2012
Research @ NDA
Research is the DNA of NDA. In early 1980s, our firm emerged from an extensive, and then pioneering,
research by Nishith M. Desai on the taxation of cross-border transactions. The research book written by him
provided the foundation for our international tax practice. Since then, we have relied upon research to be the
cornerstone of our practice development. Today, research is fully ingrained in the firm’s culture.
Our dedication to research has been instrumental in creating thought leadership in various areas of law and
public policy. Through research, we develop intellectual capital and leverage it actively for both our clients and
the development of our associates. We use research to discover new thinking, approaches, skills and reflections
on jurisprudence, and ultimately deliver superior value to our clients. Over time, we have embedded a culture
and built processes of learning through research that give us a robust edge in providing best quality advices and
services to our clients, to our fraternity and to the community at large.
Every member of the firm is required to participate in research activities. The seeds of research are typically
sown in hour-long continuing education sessions conducted every day as the first thing in the morning. Free
interactions in these sessions help associates identify new legal, regulatory, technological and business trends
that require intellectual investigation from the legal and tax perspectives. Then, one or few associates take up
an emerging trend or issue under the guidance of seniors and put it through our “Anticipate-Prepare-Deliver”
research model.
As the first step, they would conduct a capsule research, which involves a quick analysis of readily available
secondary data. Often such basic research provides valuable insights and creates broader understanding of the
issue for the involved associates, who in turn would disseminate it to other associates through tacit and explicit
knowledge exchange processes. For us, knowledge sharing is as important an attribute as knowledge acquisition.
When the issue requires further investigation, we develop an extensive research paper. Often we collect our own
primary data when we feel the issue demands going deep to the root or when we find gaps in secondary data. In
some cases, we have even taken up multi-year research projects to investigate every aspect of the topic and build
unparallel mastery. Our TMT practice, IP practice, Pharma & Healthcare/Med-Tech and Medical Device, practice
and energy sector practice have emerged from such projects. Research in essence graduates to Knowledge, and
finally to Intellectual Property.
Over the years, we have produced some outstanding research papers, articles, webinars and talks. Almost on daily
basis, we analyze and offer our perspective on latest legal developments through our regular “Hotlines”, which go
out to our clients and fraternity. These Hotlines provide immediate awareness and quick reference, and have been
eagerly received. We also provide expanded commentary on issues through detailed articles for publication in
newspapers and periodicals for dissemination to wider audience. Our Lab Reports dissect and analyze a published,
distinctive legal transaction using multiple lenses and offer various perspectives, including some even overlooked
by the executors of the transaction. We regularly write extensive research articles and disseminate them through
our website. Our research has also contributed to public policy discourse, helped state and central governments
in drafting statutes, and provided regulators with much needed comparative research for rule making. Our
discourses on Taxation of eCommerce, Arbitration, and Direct Tax Code have been widely acknowledged.
Although we invest heavily in terms of time and expenses in our research activities, we are happy to provide
unlimited access to our research to our clients and the community for greater good.
 As we continue to grow through our research-based approach, we now have established an exclusive four-acre,
 state-of-the-art research center, just a 45-minute ferry ride from Mumbai but in the middle of verdant hills of
 reclusive Alibaug-Raigadh district. Imaginarium AliGunjan is a platform for creative thinking; an apolitical eco-
 system that connects multi-disciplinary threads of ideas, innovation and imagination. Designed to inspire ‘blue
 sky’ thinking, research, exploration and synthesis, reflections and communication, it aims to bring in wholeness
– that leads to answers to the biggest challenges of our time and beyond. It seeks to be a bridge that connects the
 futuristic advancements of diverse disciplines. It offers a space, both virtually and literally, for integration and
 synthesis of knowhow and innovation from various streams and serves as a dais to internationally renowned
 professionals to share their expertise and experience with our associates and select clients.
We would love to hear your suggestions on our research reports. Please feel free to contact us at
 research@nishithdesai.com
    93 B, Mittal Court, Nariman Point           220 California Avenue, Suite 201     Prestige Loka, G01, 7/1 Brunton Rd
    Mumbai 400 021, India                       Palo Alto, CA 94306-1636, USA        Bangalore 560 025, India
    tel +91 22 6669 5000                        tel +1 650 325 7100                  tel +91 80 6693 5000
    fax +91 22 6669 5001                        fax +1 650 325 7300                  fax +91 80 6693 5001
    Level 30, Six Battery Road                  3, North Avenue, Maker Maxity        C–5, Defence Colony
    Singapore 049 909                           Bandra–Kurla Complex                 New Delhi 110 024, India
                                                Mumbai 400 051, India
    tel + 65 65509855                                                                tel +91 11 4906 5000
                                                tel +91 22 6159 5000                 fax +91 11 4906 5001
                                                fax +91 22 6159 5001
MUNICH NE W YORK