Scribd
Upload
165 views2 pages

Comment FOE Lim

The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

Uploaded by

Sharon N. Banagen Soliba
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
165 views2 pages

Comment FOE Lim

The document summarizes a comment/objection filed by the accused in a court martial case against them by the Philippine Air Force. The accused objects to several exhibits submitted as evidence by the prosecution. They argue that affidavits and statements in several of the exhibits are hearsay, self-serving, and not supported by records. Additionally, documents attached to one affidavit are inadmissible because the individual did not testify to affirm their contents. The accused requests the court deny admission of the objected exhibits.

Uploaded by

Sharon N. Banagen Soliba
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

ARMED FORCES OF THE PHILIPPINES

HEADQUARTERS PHILIPPINE AIRFORCE


PHILIPPINE AIR FORCE GENERAL COURT MARTIAL NR 1
Laurel Hall of Justice, Office of the Air Judge Advocate
Col Jesus Villamor Air Base, Pasay City

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

-VS- FOR: VIOLATION OF AW 96

ABC
Accused.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

COMMENT/OBJECTIONS
(To the Prosecution’s Formal Offer of Evidence)

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THE HONORABLE COURT.

Accused has until 20 October 2019 to file its comments/opposition to the


Prosecution’s Formal Offer of Evidence but said day is a Sunday, hence, the filing is the
next working day which is 21 October 2019. The filing of the comment/objection is
timely.

ACCUSED by the undersigned counsel and unto this Honorable Court, most
respectfully comments and/or objects to the admission of the Prosecution’s Formal Offer
of Evidence as follows:

The ACCUSED further objects to the purpose of the offer as follows:

EXHIBITS DESCRIPTION COMMENTS/OBJECTIONS

“A” Affidavit of Ms. Lim dated 04 The Accused objects to the purposes of the
May 2017 offer said statements or allegations are self-
serving, mere conclusion of law and the same
are not supported by records.

“A-1” Signature of Ms. Doreen T. De The accused admits the existence of the
Leon Sinumpaang Salaysay and the signature
thereto.

Page 1 of 2
“B” to “B-6 Attachment to the Sinumpaang The accused objects to the purpose, Tan did
Salaysay of Ms.Lim not testify before the Honorable Court to affirm
the conversation between her and Ms. Lim,
thus considered as hearsay, she was not
subjected to cross examination by the defense
counsel thus violates the constitutional right of
the accused of confrontation/cross
examination.

These attachment is likewise inadmissible


as evidence due to the reason that it was
never identified by Ms. Tan

RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Accused most respectfully prays to this Honorable Court that the
foregoing object and documentary exhibits mentioned above be denied admission for
the reasons above stated. The Accused further prays for such other relief as may be
just and equitable under the premises.

20 October 2019, Taguig City for Pasay City.

EXPLANATION

The filing of this Comment/Objection was done through LBC due to manpower
constraints.

Page 2 of 2

You might also like