Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Lesson Structure:
1. Introduction
2. Organization Behavior
6. Industrial Relation
7. Scientific Management
10. Features of OB
18. Scope of OB
23. Significance of OB
24. Criticism
25. Summary
Interdiction
The study of Organizational Behavior (OB) is very interesting and challenging too. It is related
to individuals, group of people working together in teams. The study becomes more challenging
when situational factors interact. The study of organizational behavior relates to the expected
behavior of an individual in the organization.
No two individuals are likely to behave in the same manner in a particular work situation. It is
the predictability of a manager about the expected behavior of an individual. There are no
absolutes in human behavior. It is the human factor that is contributory to the productivity hence
the study of human behavior is important. Great importance therefore must be attached to the
study.
Researchers, management practitioners, psychologists, and social scientists must understand the
very credentials of an individual, his background, social framework, educational update, impact
of social groups and other situational factors on behavior.
A successful business is not able to lack of a good management as well as manager. The manager
has important effect to activities in trading and makes profit for business. A manager who
controls employees duty and acquires goals from employees by making decision, assigning
resource and directing activities. Also, the successful manager should perform four functions
such as planning, organizing, leading and controlling. Besides that, organisational behavior holds
important role in business as well as in management. It is known as a study how individuals,
groups and structure effect and are influenced by behavior in organisations and the knowledge is
applied to individuals, groups and structure to improve or make more effectively for
organisations (Robbins,P et al.2010).
The organisational behavior is one of basic elements that support for management in business. It
can help managers understand behavior and what individuals, groups and structure are doing as
well as can predict the actions from them or can realize causes and effects among relationships in
organisations (Robbins,P et al.2010). Similarity with management functions, organisations also
use many different resources to achieve and remain the goals or objectives, these resources are
arranged into four groups such as human, financial, physical and information. So managers can
use and compose these resources with the four basic function (planning, organizing, leading and
controlling) with the purpose of getting effective goals from the organization. Following that,
managers will show how to apply these basic functions and resources to organization and its
goal. Planning is the first managerial function and it is the process that is established to
determine future position and decide how to get the goals. The second function is organizing, the
process of designing jobs and determining the tasks as well. Leading, the third function is the
process of motivating employees, group dynamics or resolving conflicts in organization.
Controlling, the fourth function, is the process of comparing, monitoring and correcting
performance with goals of the organization (Griffin & Moorhead, 2010). The successful
managers should perform effective functions and different roles in organization. The
interpersonal roles that are the main tasks of managers and are relative to employees, the
interpersonal roles are including the figurehead, the leader and the liaison. The second one is
decisional roles, there are including the entrepreneur, the disturbance handler, the resource
allocator and the negotiator. They are important roles in decision making and the high quality
decision can be productive for any organization. For example, the changing or innovations or
new planning and strategy in organization will be implemented by entrepreneur.
Organization Behavior is based on a few fundamental concepts which revolve around the nature
of people and organizations.
In every field of social science or even physical science, has a philosophical foundation of basic
concepts that guide its development. There are certain philosophical concepts in organization
behavour also.
 Individual Differences.
 Perception.
 A Whole Person.
 Motivated Behavior.
 Human Dignity.
      Mutuality of Interest.
      Holistic Concept.
The key in fully understanding the gravity of such concepts is dissection and magnification. If
we look directly at Human Relations (HR), we find a practice of understanding observational
patterns between people in the workforce. HR deals with the interactions between people that
ultimately influence the pros and cons in the work environment. It is important for HR to
thoroughly identify which members in the subset of people make a good fit for their respective
organization. This may be considered a microcosm of organizational behavior. Here we have
how the subset of people used in HR relates directly to the organization that they represent. As a
concise example, how I view my students or fellow tutors would be represented under Human
Relations; how I view Instated as a whole is my participation in Organizational Behavior.
Human relations (HR) are a department in an organization responsible for the management of
hiring qualified personnel for the purpose of filling vacant positions. HR department's activities
include but not limited to - Advertising and posting; recruiting; staffing; interviewing; training
and development; career development; layoffs; hiring; termination; and performance reviews of
company employees. Organizational behavior on the other hand is the actions and attitudes of
individuals and groups toward one another and toward the organization as a whole, and its effect
on the organization’s functioning and performance
Human relations are the relationships that are involved in a business such as employer-employee
relation and customer-business relations. Organizational behavior is the behavior that is accepted
as norm for the organization, which is usually based off the mission statement of the company.
Considering that your human resources are the most valuable in your organization, studying how
they relate to one another and to the organization is critical for success. Realizing that not every
employee responds to the same type of praise, reprimand, and/or recognition is vital to creating a
productive environment with a desirable culture. This is important not only in retaining talent,
but also in attracting new talent to your organization.
When you understand Human Relations - you will understand how a person reacts to various
situations. Take for example a sales person selling an air conditioner to a couple. By
understanding how people act will allow the salesperson to tailor his/her presentation. You will
determine who controls the money, what are a person’s hot/cold spots and when/how to close the
sale.
Organizational behavior is similar to human reactions. I like to use this metaphor. When a
manager/owner is hiring for their company, they need to find the right person for the right seat
on a bus. If you hire the right person but place them in the wrong department - you'll have a
dysfunctional business. An organization is very much alive - similar to a living organism.
Remember; hire the right person for the right seat. This will greatly help in guiding the buss in
the right direction.
Question no.4: Explain the Historical Development of Organization Behavior? (May, 2018)
In 1776, Adam Smith advocated a new form of organizational structure based on the division of
labor. One hundred years later, German Sociologist Max Weber introduced the concept about
rational organization s and initiated the concept of charismatic leadership.
Though the origin to the study of Organizational Behavior can trace its roots back to Max Weber
and earlier organizational studies, it is generally considered to have begun as an academic
discipline with the advent of scientific management in the 1890's, with Taylorism representing
the peak of the movement. Thus, it was Fredrick Winslow Taylor who introduced the systematic
use of goal setting and rewards to motivate employees that could be considered as the starting of
the academic discipline of Organizational Behavior.
Proponents of scientific management held that rationalizing the organization with precise sets of
instructions and time-motion studies would lead to increased productivity. Studies of different
compensation systems were also carried out to motivate workers.
In 1920's Elton Mayo an Australian born Harvard Professor and his colleagues conducted
productivity studies at Western Electric's Hawthorne Plant. With this epoch making study the
focus of organizational studies shifted to analysis of how human factors and psychology affected
organization s. This shift of focus in the study of organization s was called the Hawthorne Effect.
The Human Relations Movement focused on teams, motivation, and the actualization of goals of
individuals within organization s. Studies conducted by prominent scholars like Chester Barnard,
Henri Fayol, Mary Parker Follett, Frederick Herzberg, Abraham Mas low, David Mc Cellan and
Victor Vroom contributed to the growth of Organizational Behavior as a discipline.
In the 1960's and 1970's, the field was strongly influenced by social psychology and the
emphasis in academic study was quantitative research. An explosion of the orising, bounded
rationality, informal organization, contingency theory, resource dependence, institution theory
and population ecology theories has contributed to the study of organizational behavior.
A revolution in agriculture in the 1700s created conditions that favored the Industrial Revolution.
Farmers began growing new crops and using new technology such as the seed drill and the iron
plow. Increased food production improved people's diet and health, which in turn contributed to
rapid population growth. Better farming methods meant that fewer people were needed to farm.
As a result, unemployed farmers formed a large new labor force.
The Industrial Revolution began in the textile industry, where a series of inventions created new
demands for laborers. Between 1733 and 1793, inventors produced new machines, such as the
flying shuttle, the spinning jenny, and a water-powered loom, that speeded up the spinning and
weaving of wool and cotton. Many new machines were powered by running water, so inventors
built spinning mills near rivers and hired many workers to run the machines. The new machines
led to the growth of the factory system, which brought workers and machines together in one
place to manufacture goods. By the late 1700s, steam began to replace water as a source of
power. Inventors such as Thomas Newcomen and James Watt improved the steam-powered
engine. Steam engines gave a boost to two other industries that were essential to the Industrial
Revolution & emdash;coal and iron. New processes were developed to produce stronger iron. In
the mid-1800s, Henry Bessemer developed a process to improve the production of steel, a
mixture of iron and other materials. Steel triggered the growth of still other industries.
During the Industrial Revolution, advances were made in transportation and communication. In
Britain, roads made of longer-lasting surfaces and canals connected all parts of the nation. A
mining engineer, George Stephenson, developed the first steam-powered locomotive, opening
the way for the building of railroads. Railroads and steam-powered ships improved
transportation around the world. In 1837, an American inventor, Samuel F.B. Morse, devised the
telegraph, which revolutionized communications.
After the 1850s, the Industrial Revolution entered a new phase as Belgium, France, Germany, the
United States, and later Japan industrialized rapidly. The French government supported projects
to improve transportation. After Germany became unified in the 1870s, its industries forged
ahead.
The scientific management theory focused on improving the efficiency of each individual in the
organization. The major emphasis is on increasing the production through the use of intensive
technology, and the human beings are just considered as adjuncts to machines in the performance
of routine tasks.
The scientific management theory basically encompasses the work performed on the production
floor as these tasks are quite different from the other tasks performed within the organization.
Such as, these are repetitive in nature, and the individual workers performing their daily
activities are divided into a large number of cyclical repetition of same or closely related
activities. Also, these activities do not require the individual worker to exercise complex-
problem solving activity. Therefore, more attention is required to be imposed on the
standardization of working methods and hence the scientific management theory laid emphasis
on this aspect.
The major principles of scientific management, given by Taylor, can be summarized as follows:
1. Separate planning from doing.
2. The Functional foremanship of supervision, i.e. eight supervisors required to give directions
   and instructions in their respective fields.
3. Time, motion and fatigue studies shall be used to determine the fair amount of work done by
   each individual worker.
4. Improving the working conditions and standardizing the tools, period of work and cost of
   production.
6. The financial incentives should be given to the workers to boost their productivity and
   motivate them to perform well.
Thus, the scientific management theory focused more on mechanization and automation, i.e.,
technical aspects of efficiency rather than the broader aspects of human behavior in the
organization.
Question no.7: What are major findings of the Hawthorne Experiments? Discuss their
utility to a practice. (May, 2016)
Individual behaviors may be altered by the study itself, rather than the effect the study is
researching was demonstrated in a research project (1927 - 1932) of the Hawthorne plant of the
Western Electric Company in Cicero, Illinois. This series of research, first led by Harvard
Business School professor Elton Mayo along with associates F. J. Roethlisberger and William J.
Dickson started out by examining the physical and environmental influences of the workplace
(e.g. brightness of lights, humidity) and later, moved into the psychological aspects (e.g. breaks,
group pressure, working hours, managerial leadership). The ideas that this team developed about
the social dynamics of groups in the work setting had lasting influence — the collection of data,
labor-management relations, and informal interaction among factory employees.
The major finding of the study was that almost regardless of the experimental manipulation
employed, the production of the workers seemed to improve. One reasonable conclusion is that
the workers were pleased to receive attention from the researchers who expressed an interest in
them. The study was only expected to last one year, but because the researchers were set back
each time they tried to relate the manipulated physical conditions to the worker's efficiency, the
project extended out to five years.
The aptitudes of individuals are imperfect predictors of job performance. Although they give
some indication of the physical and mental potential of the individual, the amount produced is
strongly influenced by social factors.
Informal organization affects productivity. The Hawthorne researchers discovered a group life
among the workers. The studies also showed that the relations that supervisors develop with
workers tend to influence the manner in which the workers carry out directives.
Work-group norms affect productivity. The Hawthorne researchers were not the first to
recognize that work groups tend to arrive at norms of what is a fair day's work; however, they
provided the best systematic description and interpretation of this phenomenon.
The workplace is a social system. The Hawthorne researchers came to view the workplace as a
social system made up of interdependent parts.
For decades, the Hawthorne studies provided the rationale for human relations within the
organization. Then two researchers (Franke, Kaul, 1978) used a new procedure called time-series
analyses. Using the original variables and including in the Great Depression and the instance of a
managerial discipline in which two insubordinate and mediocre workers were replaced by two
different productive workers, with one who took the role of straw boss (see note below); they
discovered that production was most affected by the replacement of the two workers due to their
greater productivity and the affect of the disciplinary action on the other workers. The
occurrence of the Depression also encouraged job productivity, perhaps through the increased
importance of jobs and the fear of losing them. Rest periods and a group incentive plan also had
a somewhat positive smaller effect on productivity. These variables accounted for almost all the
variation in productivity during the experimental period. Early social sciences may have readily
to embrace the original Hawthorne interpretations since it was looking for theories or work
motivations that were more humane and democratic.
The Hawthorne Effect is largely about managing employees so they feel more like an integral
part of your business. Encouraging employee input into workplace decisions and operational
decisions tends to make employees feel more like part of a cohesive team striving to achieve the
common goal of making the business more profitable. One of the first steps you can take to
induce the Hawthorne effect in your own business is to try to put yourself inside the perspective
of your employees and attempt to see your business operation from their perspective. From this
point, attempt to determine what you could do to enhance a feeling of teamwork and greater
participation in the overall success of the business. For example, you could periodically hold
focus group meetings with employees to get their input on changes to the operating procedures
that could improve their working conditions. Another step that can make employees feel more
connected and appreciated is to make sure that management personnel are located nearby and
easily accessible when employees may have questions. Part of the research on the Hawthorne
effect determined that employees tend to be more productive when they feel that their efforts are
being watched and that attention is paid to their performance. Because the Hawthorne studies
concluded that generally any change in the workplace tends to induce the Hawthorne effect, it
may be a good idea to make changes periodically. Such changes can be as simple as those in the
original Hawthorne studies, such as changing the lighting. The most effective changes are likely
to be those that result from employee input. Boosting productivity from your employees is as
simple as paying more attention to them and their needs and concerns. Making employees feel
more appreciated encourages them to improve their performance.
Question no.8: Briefly explain the meaning and definition of organization behavior? (May,
2019)
1. A Field of Inquiry
A field open to an inquiry is open to anyone who wants to examine, explore and understand or
even to evaluate and predict. That makes all of us Lay, scientists because all of us have our own
theories that describe, explain and prescribe behavior and some of us want to test them, share
them and improvise upon them. A scientific theory explains a phenomenon on the basis of a
plausible general principle.
If we understand a theory as an explanation of reality, even when restricted to formal
organizations, the organizational behavior faces the tough challenges of being systematic and
free of biases, open-minded and enquiring, quantitative through measurements without losing
sensitivity to the qualitative dimensions, tolerant to multiplicity of valid explanations and
accepting of knowledge emerging from practice.
While behavioral sciences may focus on any behavior in general, including animal behavior
organizational behavior is concerned with human behavior in work setting. Whenever is the type
of an organization whenever work happens, the basic OB position is that all of such organization
s represents a dynamic interrelation between individuals, groups and the largest elements of the
organization?
This means that a valid understanding of OB requires not just an individual or group focus and
inquiring as to how they behave at work but also the characteristics pattern of organizational
actions over time, which reflects that organizational knowledge.
The basic value in the study of OB is that an individual is an autonomous entity, with an innate
potential to be creative & productive. In contrast to driving human performance, the emphasis is
on creativity and the joy of freedom of choice. This difference arises because of the basic
assumption that a person, who values autonomy and choice, would also be aware of the
responsibility of making appropriate choices.
The view highlights the importance of the knowledge that supports the autonomy and choice as
well as the continued development and growth of the individual. If everyone has such a potential
for development, learning and choice then collective human efforts should be organized in a
democratize manner and through goodwill and fairness, so as to nurture, support and facilitate
the efforts to relies on the human potential.
4. Importance of Groups 
5. Ongoing Process
Question no.10: Discuss the basic assumption of Organization Behavior? (May, 2017)
Every field of social science has a philosophical foundation of basic concepts that guides its
development. Organizational behavior is based on the basic concept of human relations
which is a noteworthy social approach towards the establishment of inter-personal
relationship between superiors and subordinates. Organizational behavior deals with a set
of fundamental concepts revolving around the nature of the people and organization. These
concepts of organizational behavior are as follows:
             Basic Assumptions of OB
The human resources approach is concerned with the growth and development of people towards
higher levels of competency, creativity and fulfillment, because people are the central resource in
any organization. This approach help employees become better in terms of work and
responsibility and then it tries to create a climate in which they can contribute to the best of their
improved abilities. This approach is also known as ‘supportive approach’ because the manager’s
primary role changes from control of employees to providing an active support for their growth
and performance.
A Contingency Approach
Productivity Approach
Productivity is a ratio that compares units of output with units of input. It is often measured in
terms of economic inputs and outputs. Productivity is considered to be improved, if more outputs
can be produced from the same amount of inputs. But besides economic inputs and outputs,
human and social inputs and outputs also arc important.
Systems Approach
Organizations arc dependent upon their surrounding environment in two main ways: First, the
organization requires ‘inputs’ from the environment in the form of raw material, people, money,
ideas and so on. The organization itself can be thought of as performing certain ‘transformation’
processes, on its inputs in order to create outputs in the form of products or
services. Secondly, the organization depends on environment such as, public to accept its output.
The systems view of organization thus emphasizes on the key interdependencies that
organizations must manage. Within themselves the organizations must trade off the
interdependencies among people, tasks, technology and structure in order to perform their
transformation processes effectively and efficiently. Organizations must also recognize their
interdependence with the broader environments within which they exist.
Definition: The Classical Theory is the traditional theory, wherein more emphasis is on the
organization rather than the employees working therein. According to the classical theory, the
organization is considered as a machine and the human beings as different components/parts of
that machine.
The classical perspective of management, which emerged from the Industrial Revolution,
focuses on improving the efficiency, productivity, and output of employees, as well as the
business as a whole. However, it generally does not focus on human or behavioral attributes or
variances among employees, such as how job satisfaction improves employee efficiency.
Classical management theory is based on the belief that workers only have physical and
economic needs. It does not take into account social needs or job satisfaction, but instead
advocates a specialization of labor, centralized leadership and decision-making, and profit
maximization.
Surprisingly, the classical theory developed in three streams which are explained as Bureaucracy
(Weber), Administrative Theory (Fayol), and Scientific Management (Taylor).
Difference between Fayol and Taylor’s Theories of Management
Henry Fayol also known as ‘father of modern management theory’ gave a new perception to the
concept of management. He introduced a general theory that can be applied to all levels of
management and every department. The Fayol theory is practiced by the managers to organize
and regulate the internal activities of an organization. He concentrated on accomplishing
managerial efficiency.
F.W. Taylor or Fredrick Winslow Taylor is also known as the ‘father of scientific management’
proved with his practical theories that a scientific method can be implemented to management.
This scientific process involved experiments, observation, analysis, and inference and was
applied to create a cause and effect relationship. Taylor gave much concentration on the
supervisory level of management and performance of managers and workers at an operational
level.
Approach       Top management based on top downward Supervisory viewpoint and bottom
               approach.                                          upward approach
3. The market-friendly approach, which suggests that, while markets work, they sometimes fail
   to emerge, and a government has an important role in compensating for three main market
   failures: missing markets, imperfect knowledge and externalities.
New-classical theorists rejected the Keynesian view which dominated the 1970s. Despite
differences of emphasis, they have tended to agree that development is best left to markets. In
particular, New-classical economists believe that, to develop, countries must liberate their
markets, encourage entrepreneurship (risk taking), privatize state owned industries, and reform
labor markets, such as by reducing the powers of trade unions.
Trade liberalization
There is a broad consensus between New-classical economists that free trade can help stimulate
growth and development by encouraging inward investment and the application of economies of
scale and economies of scope, increasing competition and breaking down domestic monopolies
and creating a low inflation environment.
(a) Systems approach:
This approach is based on the view that an organization is an open system composed of inter-
related and interdependent elements. The organization is an open-adaptive system interacting
with its own environment. The salient features are:
(f) Integration and co-ordination of all sub systems into the total system,
(g) Attention is paid towards the over-all effectiveness of the system rather than the effectiveness
of the sub-systems.
(b) Contingency approach:
This is concerned with the analysis of specific organizations with their external environments
and the adoption of a suitable structure to meet the requirements of the situation. The emphasis is
on the need to adapt the organization to the demand of changing technology, need for innovation
generating from environmental and decision making uncertainty. This approach suggests that
“There is no one best way to handle any of the managerial problems and there is no one best
organizational structure to suit all situations.”
(i) Situational factors play an important role in the design of organizational structure and a
suitable management style
(ii) The determinants are (i) Size of the organization: Bigger the size, higher the complexity, (ii)
Interaction need: free flow of communication needed.
(c) Multivariate approach:
This approach is a modification of the contingency approach. It views the organization as
consisting of four interacting variables namely:
(i) Task,
(ii) Structure,
(iv) People-Interactive means a change in any one variable automatically produces a change in
other variables. The interacting variables are:
Change can effectively begin in any one variable as people are reoriented, structure, task and
technology can be changed. Exhibit 10.2 illustrates the multi-variety approach to organizational
theory.
Question no.17: What is Organization Behavior? What is its scope? What is the necessity of
studying this subject? (May, 2019)
Answer: For understanding the Organization Behavior refer question no 8.
Scope of Organization Behavior:
   Individual Differences
   Perception.
   A Whole Person.
   Motivated Behavior.
   The desire for Involvement.
   The value of the Person.
   Human Dignity.
   Organizations are Social System.
   Mutuality of Interest.
   Holistic Concept.
1. Individual Differences Organizational behavior assumes that all the individuals are differences
from each other. The difference in individuals can be in several ways like physical
characteristics, intelligence, perception, personality, attitudes, aptitudes, emotion, learning
capability and communicative ability.
3. Selective Perception is a process by which individuals organize and interpret their sensory
impressions in order to give meaning to the environment (Robbins, 1997). Perception is an
individual’s own view. Each person has a unique way to see, organize and interpret about event,
people and things.
5. Value of the Person Organizational behavior assumes that people are more valuable and
different than non-living things. Employees should be treated with respect, dignity and equity by
the organizations. Employees should not be treated only economic tools. 6. Desire for
Involvement Individuals have desire for involvement in work. They want to show their
creativity, skills, and efficiency while doing the work. People have capabilities for task
performance, role fulfillment, and meaningful contribution and to meet challenging situations.
1. Social System Organizations are the part of social system. Organizations are operated by
social and psychological laws. Organizational behavior assumes that organizations are open
social system. These systems affect behavior of individual.
3. Ethical Treatment Ethics involves moral issues and choices. It deals with right or wrong
behavior about event, people and things. Ethical behavior of an individual depends on the moral
standard or codes of conduct determined by society. Managerial ethics is the standard of
behavior that guides individuals’ managers in their work. Organizational should establish rules,
code of conduct, working procedures and system.
In conclusion, the basic assumption of organizational behavior is two types. They are nature of
people and nature of organization. A basic assumption about nature of people incorporates
individual differences, a whole person, and motivated behavior, value of the person, selective
perception, and desire for involvement. A basic assumption about nature of organizations
involves social system, mutuality of interest, and ethical treatment.
 People
 Structure
 Technology
People
An organization consists of people with different traits, personality, skills, qualities, interests,
background, beliefs, values and intelligence. In order to maintain a healthy environment, all the
employees should be treated equally and be judged according to their work and other aspects
that affect the firm.
Example − A company offers campus placement to trainees from different states like Orissa,
Haryana, Arunachal Pradesh and many more. However, during and after training, all trainees
are examined only on the basis of their performance in the tasks assigned.
Organizational Structure
Example − Organizational structure defines the relation of a manager with employees and co-
workers.
Technology
Technology can be defined as the implementation of scientific knowledge for practical usage. It
also provides the resources required by the people that affect their work and task performance in
the right direction.
Example − Introduction of SAP, big data and other software in the market determines
individual and organizational performance.
Environment
All companies function within a given internal and external environment. Internal environment
can be defined as the conditions, factors, and elements within an enterprise that influences the
activities, choices made by the firm, and especially the behavior of the employees. While
external environment can be defined as outside factors that affect the company's ability to
operate. Some of them can be manipulated by the company’s marketing, while others require
the company to make adjustments.
Organizational behavior is the study of human behavior in the workplace, the interaction
between people and the organization with the intent to understand and predict human behavior.
The understanding of individual, group, and organizational behavior is critical to success as a
leader or a follower, and it requires a systematic study to even begin to grasp all of the variables
that impact behavior.
      Human behavior can be understood and predicted, but it often depends on the
       contingencies or the situation.