0% found this document useful (0 votes)
101 views2 pages

Evaluation Fbla

The document outlines the evaluation process including walkthroughs, improvement plans, and post-conference meetings. Walkthroughs are 5-8 minutes with clear expectations. Improvement plans must have decisions by April 30th and be more directive, focusing on specific standards. Post-conference meetings give specific feedback and ask reflective questions to guide growth. Formal evaluations involve observing lessons objectively and documenting evidence tied to standards and areas for growth.

Uploaded by

api-494663163
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
101 views2 pages

Evaluation Fbla

The document outlines the evaluation process including walkthroughs, improvement plans, and post-conference meetings. Walkthroughs are 5-8 minutes with clear expectations. Improvement plans must have decisions by April 30th and be more directive, focusing on specific standards. Post-conference meetings give specific feedback and ask reflective questions to guide growth. Formal evaluations involve observing lessons objectively and documenting evidence tied to standards and areas for growth.

Uploaded by

api-494663163
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Walk
Throughs
 5-8 minutes
 Clear purpose
 Clearly communicated
expectations/form
Improvement
 Evidence based – no
assumptions
Plans
 School culture –  April 30th – must have a decision by
expected often and board about termination
invited
 More directive conversation
 Reflective questions to
guide growth  Career teacher on a plan for a
 Base feedback around
building goals
specific standard is not entitled to a
2nd improvement plan on the same Evaluations
standard while still within the district
 Use observations to – dismiss at end of year, dismiss at
guide Professional end of following year, immediate Shelby McIlravy
Development dismissal
 Use all standards that need growth
for plan
 Can’t be on a plan for more then 180
days with a review at least every 90

Drake University
EDL 278: Supervision of Instruction
Post Conference Meetings
Give specific, critical feedback – FOLLOW UP
Good teachers areas for growth: ICPD, building/district goals, initiatives they can
lead
Don’t overwhelm the teacher – pick highest leverage areas to target for growth
Ask clarifying questions about areas not observed
Use ORID framework to guide conversation – narrow focus on improvement
Teacher should be talking almost 80% of the time

Formal
Evaluati
During Observation
Pre-Conference  Learning objective
 Curriculum and instruction
Communicate expectations and process  Building goals
Review lesson plan and objectives  Classroom management
Teacher requested “look fors”  Differentiation
Review scheduled time/location  Assessment
Review teacher ICPD  Student Engagement
Ask for permission to record lesson  Objectively collect evidence – checklist,
narrative, diary
 Document in 3rd person
 Clear and concise language tied to standards
 “The expectations is…” (areas of growth)
 Align recommendations to areas of growth
 Respond to teachers areas of focus

You might also like