Scribd
Upload
29 views1 page

Scholarly or Other Articles About A Topic, Especially by People Not Directly Involved. and Also Works of Criticism and Interpretation

The document discusses Philippine history as written and provides examples of different types of historical sources. It agrees that written Philippine history is generally just and provides enough information for Filipinos to understand the country's past, but notes it may not be completely detailed. It then gives examples of primary sources like diaries and letters, secondary sources like scholarly articles, oral evidence like interviews, material evidence like artistic creations, diplomatic sources like record groups, and social documents like congressional records and organizational rules.

Uploaded by

Jay-ar Castillo Watin Jr.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
29 views1 page

Scholarly or Other Articles About A Topic, Especially by People Not Directly Involved. and Also Works of Criticism and Interpretation

The document discusses Philippine history as written and provides examples of different types of historical sources. It agrees that written Philippine history is generally just and provides enough information for Filipinos to understand the country's past, but notes it may not be completely detailed. It then gives examples of primary sources like diaries and letters, secondary sources like scholarly articles, oral evidence like interviews, material evidence like artistic creations, diplomatic sources like record groups, and social documents like congressional records and organizational rules.

Uploaded by

Jay-ar Castillo Watin Jr.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Christine Mae Joy C.

Watin

Task:

A. Answer the following. Substantiate your answers.


1.Do you agree that the Philippine history as written, is just, enough, and complete?
For me, I agree that the Philippine history as written is just and enough for us Filipino’s to
able understand and impart us a knowledge about the past of our country. But I cannot say
that all books or in any other written source is complete or detailed about Philippine history
because there are some other book the information’s are summarized by the other author
though they examine and analyzed the gathered data.

B. Give 2-3 examples of the following terms. You may add short explanation or description for
each example if needed.
1. Primary sources -Diaries, letters and speeches by what the people said or wrote
2. Secondary sources -Scholarly or other articles about a topic, especially by people not
directly involved. And also works of criticism and interpretation.
3. Oral evidence-Interviews and Testimonies
4. Material evidence- Artistic creations such as roads, graves and churches
5. Diplomatic sources- Record groups and Presidential libraries
6. Social documents- Congressional Record (Proceedings and Debate of the Congress)
-Organizational Rules and “Bureaucratic Personality”

You might also like