Classroom Management
Standard 6. A teacher creates and maintains a learning environment in which all students are
actively engaged and contributing members.
The Candidate demonstrates their understanding of how to connect concepts and use differing
perspectives to engage learners in critical/creative thinking and collaborative problem solving
related to authentic local and global issues, as well as demonstrates their ability to integrate a
variety of instructional approaches for all members of the classroom; considers learners’ needs,
interests, and goals in determining instructional strategies to engage students as both learners and
teachers.
My philosophy of teaching has changed little over the course of this program. What has
developed instrumentally is the level of congruency between my philosophy and my actual
classroom management and practice. I am confident that my classroom management style is well
grounded in constructivist theory. I have studied several theorists and the relationships between
them with an emphasis in how their ideas commonly manifest in the school setting. I can now
identify which theorists influence my practice and can weed out any practices that are not
serving my philosophy. In their book Setting Limits in the Classroom, educational psychologists
Robert J. MacKenzie and special education teacher Lisa Stanzione (2010) state that, “An
effective classroom is like a table supported by four legs: effective structure, positive
relationships, engaging instruction, and effective limit-setting practices” (p. xii).
Effective Structure
I have a proactive approach to classroom management. I believe that setting clear and
consistent academic and behavioral expectations and establishing classroom routines early on
will prevent many behavior issues. “Stable routines help children know what to expect, and
therefore can assist them in being cooperative members of the group. Routines also provide
emotional security through predictability” (Fields, Meritt, & Fields, 2014, p. 122). Teachers must
be intentional in everything they do. It is critical to design how we want our classroom to be.
Even “the design of the environment has a profound effect on motivation and our sense of well-
being, behavior, and learning.” (Fields, Meritt, & Fields, 2014, p. 77) What it will look like, how
routines and procedures will work, whom we collaborate with and in what ways, how we will
grade work, get the class’s attention, and how we will motivate students are just a few of the
facets to consider. As an assignment I was asked to create an ideal classroom outline as a practice
for my future first year in teaching, which required consideration for all of these aspects.
Positive Relationships
To be effective teachers we must establish and maintain trusting relationships with our
students that are built on mutual respect. Trust is the foundation on which positive relationships
build upon. “Trust is the culmination of intentional actions, reactions, attitudes, and moments we
share with those around us” (Murray, 2019, p. 37). We can build trust by viewing our students as
unique individuals with the potential to succeed which allows us to be responsive to their
specific needs. Every student comes to school with his or her own knowledge and skills based on
previous experiences. We can capitalize our students' strengths and channel their energy toward
positive behavior but we must know and respect our students to do so fully. It is also critical to
provide a safe and welcoming classroom environment in which every student can be a valued
and contributing member. Students feel safe and secure when they know what is expected of
them and how misbehavior is responded to.
Maslow provides us with a hierarchy of needs with physiological needs as the largest and
most important needs. “In Maslow’s theory, needs that are lower in this hierarchy must be at least
partially satisfied before a person will try to satisfy higher-level needs.” (Slavin, 2015, p. 250)
He identifies the most important needs to be love and self-esteem. “Students who do not feel that
they are loved and that they are capable are unlikely to have a strong motivation to achieve the
higher-level growth objectives” (Slavin, 2015, p. 251). The importance of building positive
relationships with students is apparent.
Engaging Instruction
Within these established relationships we must continually express our belief that each of
our students is capable of success. “Every student has a hidden and extensive capacity to learn…
It is the teacher’s responsibility to be the engineer of student success” (Tomlinson, 2014, p. 26).
To engineer their success teachers must know students well. Instruction should be differentiated
to the needs and style preferences of students. For instruction to be engaging it must be relevant
to the interests and lives of students. “To focus on students is first to be attentive to who they are
– their cultural backgrounds, their strengths, the kinds of questions that motivate them” (Perrone,
1991, p. 25).
As Marvin Marshall, an extremely influential authority in education, advises, "create
curiosity, interest, enjoyment, and challenge with activities that will have students want to put
forth effort in learning" (Charles, 2014, p. 164). In his book Teach Like a Champion: 2.0,
educator Doug Lemov (2015) includes several instructional strategies that set high academic
expectations and build ratio. Favorites of mine that I have incorporated into my own teaching
practice include no opt out, right is right, stretch it, format matters, without apology, thumbs up/
down, cold call, hold up a card, Think/Pair/Share. Each of these techniques encourage
participation and provide feedback which allows me to make data-informed decisions for future
instruction.
Effective Limit-Setting Practices
Much like we need order and routine for optimal classroom function, our students require
consistency and clear expectations to thrive in our classrooms. It is equally vital to dedicate time
to teaching these things to the students. In order for students to understand what is appropriate
behavior, they must be given clear, consistent, expectations. In their book, How to Be an
Effective Teacher The First Days of School (1998), Harry and Rosemary Wong state that
“Student achievement at the end of the year is directly related to the degree to which the teacher
establishes good control of classroom procedures in the very first week of school” (p. 4).
Expectations and rules must be taught, modeled, practiced. Often times this process needs
to be repeated whether for individuals or the whole class. When misbehavior does arise, it is
paramount that the behavior is separated from the student. According to Marshall, “Without that
separation, students become defensive when asked to change their behavior” (Charles, 2014, p.
167). Students need to feel confident that we believe in their ability to change and grow, and
understand that we all make mistakes. This perspective helps students develop a growth mindset.
Most discipline problems can be prevented. However, undesirable behavior is inevitable. How
we choose to respond to it is something that we can prepare for, practice, and learn from because
after all, we all make mistakes.
Minor discipline problems can generally be solved in a non-intrusive way such as
utilizing proximity, signals, or reminders. Educational psychologist, Fred Jones, advocates for
nonverbal communication in achieving desirable behavior. “Jones says few physical acts are
more effective than eye contact for conveying the impression of being in control” (as cited in
Charles, 2014, p. 37). Bigger, more serious, or chronic discipline issues, may require a number of
approaches or techniques such as loss of privilege, one-on-one conferencing, calls home,
behavior contracts, or support from other staff. Whatever the consequence, it should be logical
and proportionate to the behavior, and we should strive to keep students in our own classroom
whenever possible. The most important part of a teacher's response is to remove emotion and
remain calm so we will be able to respond rationally and treat our students with respect while
still holding them accountable.
By circumstance, during my practicum experiences, I was walking into classrooms for
which I had not established these procedures. Instead of teaching new routines or expectations I
emphasized to students that when I am teaching the class the expectations will be the same as
those of my host teacher. With younger students I found it extremely helpful to have them then
tell me some of their class rules and expectations, and then later draw upon the very rules they
had verbalized to correct behavior. This is demonstrated in the implementation of this first grade
language arts lesson plan, which is outlined in the feedback notes from my host teacher in the
reflection portion of the artifact. These strategies allowed them to take ownership over the
classroom culture that they had helped create and maintain. “When the class as a whole has
agreed on a set of rules, offenders know that they are transgressing community norms, not the
teacher’s arbitrary regulations.” (Slavin, 2015, p. 279).
Fields, Meritt, and Fields (2014) stress that, “Constructivist discipline strategies are
aimed at helping children construct socially productive behavior rules and values for themselves.
The approach is aimed at helping children become better able to reason, and thus become more
reasonable human beings” (p. 10). When students feel that they are valued and respected
members of the classroom they are more likely to be committed to upholding order and
maintaining a positive learning environment. Establishing and maintaining a classroom culture
that promotes cooperative learning and mutual respect increases the chance the students will care
about the well-being and learning of classmates as well. These two concepts are foundational in
constructivist theory.
Here I have three vignettes along with my reflection of each from my time in
fourth and first grade classrooms. Central themes that are present in each of these vignettes is my
commitment to the inclusion and success of each student, my ability to separate behavior from
the individual and treat students with respect, and the intention of using the least intrusive
intervention needed to adjust behavior.
References
Charles, C.M. (2014) Building classroom discipline, 11th ed. Allyn &Bacon
Fields, M.V., Meritt, P.A. & Fields, D.M. (2014). Constructive guidance and discipline: Birth to
age eight, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J. Pearson.
Lemov, D. (2015). Teach like a champion: 2.0. Jossey-Bass.
MacKenzie, R.J. & Stanzione, L. (2010) Setting limits in the classroom. 3rd ed. Prima.
Murray, T.C. (2019). Personal & authentic: Designing learning experiences that impact a
lifetime. Columbia, SC. IMPress.
Perrone, V. (1991) A letter to teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Slavin, R.E. (2015). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. New York: Pearson
Education Inc.
Tomlinson, C. (2014) Differentiated classrooms: Responding to the needs of all learners, 2nd
ed. ASCD
Wong H.K. & Wong R.T. (1998). How to be an effective teacher the first days of school.
Mountain View, CA: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc.