Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol.
44, July 2006
HS–SPME Determination of Volatile Carbonyl and
Carboxylic Compounds in Different Matrices
Elena E. Stashenko1,*, Amanda L. Mora2, Martha Cervantes1, and Jairo R. Martínez1
                                                                                                                                                                            Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
1Laboratorio
          de Cromatografía-CIBIMOL, Escuela de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Industrial de Santander, A.A. 678,
Bucaramanga, Colombia and 2Escuela de Química, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Colombia
 Abstract                                                                                            place safety studies (2–4). The achievement of trace-level detec-
                                                                                                     tion limits for these polar compounds normally requires sample
Specific chromatographic methodologies are developed for the                                         preconcentration (cryogenic trapping, adsorption on sorbent car-
analysis of carboxylic acids (C2–C6, benzoic) and aldehydes (C2–C10)                                 tridges, or chemical derivatization) (5). Sampling with sorbents
of low molecular weight in diverse matrices, such as air, automotive                                 followed by thermal desorption has been employed successfully in
exhaust gases, human breath, and aqueous matrices. For carboxylic                                    the determination of nonpolar contaminants in air. However, the
acids, the method is based on their reaction with pentafluorobenzyl                                  application of this method to the determination of polar com-
bromide in aqueous solution, followed by the separation and                                          pounds is hindered by their strong adsorption and the partial loss
identification of the resultant pentafluorobenzyl esters by means of                                 of these compounds on the surfaces of injectors and chromato-
headspace (HS)–solid-phase microextraction (SPME) combined with
                                                                                                     graphic columns (5,6). A solution to this drawback has consisted
gas chromatography (GC) and electron capture detection (ECD).
Detection limits in the µg/m3 range are reached, with relative
                                                                                                     of the combination of chemical derivatization with the use of
standard deviation (RSD) less than 10% and linear response (R2 >                                     solid sorbents (3,7). Thus, the most common analytical procedure
0.99) over two orders of magnitude. The analytical methodology for                                   for the determination of aldehydes and ketones in air involves the
aldehydes is based on SPME with simultaneous derivatization of the                                   circulation of air over a solid sorbent, which has been previously
analytes on the fiber, by reaction with pentafluorophenylhydrazine.                                  impregnated with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (8–10). The deriva-
The derivatization reagent is previously deposited on the SPME                                       tives are then removed with solvent and quantitated by means of
fiber, which is then exposed to the gaseous matrix or the HS of the                                  high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–UV, which
sample solution. The pentafluorophenyl hydrazones formed on the                                      achieves detection limits in the µg/m3 range. A chlorinated
fiber are analyzed selectively by means of GC–ECD, with detection                                    derivatization analogue, 2,4,6-trichlorophenylhydrazine, has
limits in the ng/m3 range, RSD less than 10%, and linear response                                    been employed with gas chromatography (GC)–electron capture
(R2 > 0.99) over two orders of magnitude.
                                                                                                     detection (ECD) to achieve detection limits in the sub-µg/m3
                                                                                                     range (11), in a procedure that involves sealing the cartridge after
                                                                                                     sampling and heating it to 100°C for 6 min to perform the deriva-
Introduction                                                                                         tization. However, this method requires the addition of an ozone
                                                                                                     trap to prevent oxidation and deactivation of the derivatization
                                                                                                     agent. Similar detection limits have been obtained in the
  Carboxylic and carbonylic substances are part of the great                                         GC–MSD quantitation of the oximes formed by the reaction of
variety of organic volatile compounds that may be present in air                                     carbonyls with O-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorobenzyl)hydroxylamine
as contaminants. These substances may be dispersed in the atmo-                                      (PFBHA) over a polymeric sorbent (Tenax) (3). Cecinato et al. (12)
sphere from anthropogenic and biogenic primary sources, or they                                      reached parts per trillion by volume detection limits in the deter-
may originate in the atmosphere itself as a result of the different                                  mination of carbonyls in air when they utilized silica cartridges
photochemical reactions that all the hydrocarbon-polluting                                           impregnated with 2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophenyl hydrazine (PFPH)
agents can undergo (1). The main sources of carboxylic acids are                                     to form hydrazones that were extracted in dichloromethane–ace-
the oxidation of aldehydes and the reactions of alkenes with                                         tonitrile (4:1) and quantitated with GC–MSD in selected ion mon-
ozone. Because of their ample participation in the photochemical                                     itoring mode.
reactions of the troposphere and their injurious effects on the                                         The most common analytical procedures for carboxylic acids in
atmosphere and human health, the determination of these com-                                         air and car exhaust include a sampling step with either liquid
pounds in air has become important for environmental and work-                                       (potassium hydroxide or calcium hydroxide aqueous solutions) or
                                                                                                     solid traps (2,13–17). Quartz, glass wool, or cellulose are typical
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: email elena@tucan.uis.edu.co.                   supports used in the latter type of traps to embed potassium
                                         Reproduction (photocopying) of editorial content of this journal is prohibited without publisher’s permission.             347
                                                                                           Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
hydroxide, sodium carbonate, or calcium hydroxide. Potassium-         ethyl acetate, and sulfuric acid were purchased from Mallinckrodt
impregnated silica gel-C18 cartridges have been employed as well      (Mexico D.F., Mexico). Propionic acid, sodium chloride, and
(18,19). These sampling approaches have been combined with            potassium carbonate were obtained from Merck (Schuchardt,
various instrumental techniques, such as ion chromatography,          Germany). Zero air (20% O2 in N2) and high-purity gases
liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis, and                 for chromatography were obtained from Aga Fano S.A.
GC (13–19). However, low selectivity, low sensitivity, and long       (Bucaramanga, Colombia). Fused-silica fibers coated with PDMS
analysis times are common to these procedures. Ion chromatog-         (100 µm), poly(acrylate) (85 µm), or PDMS–divinylbenzene
raphy and GC are the preferred quantitation methods for               (DVB) (65 µm) for use in SPME were purchased from Supelco
these analytes, but a sensitive analysis with few interferences       (Bellefonte, PA). The performance of all three fiber types in the
requires the introduction of a derivatization step during sample      determination of carboxylic acids and carbonyl compounds was
preparation (2,20,21). Sylilation and alkylation are the              compared. Because of their superior retention capacity, the
most common approaches. Ester formation has been achieved             poly(acrylate) and PDMS–DVB coatings were chosen for the car-
                                                                                                                                                    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
by means of reagents such as boron trifluoride–butanol (22–24),       boxylic acid and carbonyl compound determinations, respec-
boron trifluoride–methanol (13), diazomethane (25,26),                tively.
pentafluorobenzylbromide (PFBBr) (1), and dibromoacetophe-
none (13,17).                                                         Air sampling
   Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) constitutes an interesting        Air samples were collected with an M18 VacBag sampler system
and efficient variation of the trapping–derivatization methods        (SK-M180), together with a gas sampling pump (TBP-102) and
needed for the determination of carbonyls and carboxylic acids in     3-L gas sampling Tedlar bags, which were obtained from Apex Inc.
air because it permits the combination of concentration, derivati-    Instruments (Holly Springs, NC). A sampling flow of 0.02 L/min
zation, and thermal desorption in a single device. Martos and         during 12.5–15 min was employed in all cases. For carboxylic
Pawliszyn employed a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-coated               acid determination, the contents of the Tedlar bag were then bub-
SPME fiber, previously impregnated with PFBHA, for the                bled at 0.2 mL/min through two impingers connected in series,
GC–MSD determination of formaldehyde in air (27). This method         each one containing potassium carbonate solution (50 mg/L
showed good agreement with the results of the National Institute      and 30 mL).
of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) method when it was
applied in the field and indoors (28). Pan and Pawliszyn (29) and     Carboxylic acid determination
Lee et al. (30) employed diazomethane to derivatize long-chain           Stock solutions of the carboxylic acids (10mM) in acetone were
carboxylic acids after their absorption on PDMS-coated SPME           used to prepare individual aqueous solutions of various concen-
fibers. For low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids, 1-pyrenyldia-      trations (1.27, 2.70, 5.20, 7.20, 10.8, 21.6, 32.0, 43.2, 86.4, and
zomethane was used. It was loaded onto the SPME fiber before its      172.8µM). The derivatization reaction conditions for aqueous
exposition to the sample that contained the carboxylic acids (29).    solutions of carboxylic acids were adapted from those used by
Detection limits in the ng/L to µg/L range were obtained with         Kawahara (32) with nonaqueous media. Instead of using acetone,
these methods for the determination of carboxylic acids in            as in Kawahara’s method, the derivatization reaction was per-
aqueous solutions.                                                    formed directly in aqueous solution. The esters thus formed were
   This work reports on the development of analytical protocols       extracted by means of SPME rather than with solvent extraction
for the determination of low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids        (procedure used in Kawahara’s method). Reagent concentration,
and aldehydes in air, using derivatization to pentafluorophenyl or    solution pH, temperature, and reaction time were changed, one
pentafluorobenzyl analogues, which were quantitated with high         at a time, within intervals determined by means of preliminary
selectivity and sensitivity by means of headspace (HS)–SPME and       experiments, in order to determine the conditions that afforded
GC–ECD. An on-fiber derivatization SPME–GC–ECD method-                an improved overall esterification yield without increasing its
ology, previously developed in our laboratory for the determina-      standard deviation. For the standard derivatization conditions
tion of carbonyls generated during lipid peroxidation (31), was       selected, the acid solution (9 mL) was transferred to a 12-mL vial
applied to air analysis. Examples of the application of the analyt-   where it was mixed with potassium carbonate (1 mL and 0.5 g/L)
ical protocols to the determination of these analytes in diverse      and a nine-fold excess of PFBBr (430mM in acetone). The vials
matrices (breath, foot sweat, car exhaust, and indoor air at a shoe   were sealed, stored at 60°C for 4 h, and, finally, transferred to an
factory) are included.                                                ice-water bath for 10 min. This procedure was employed with all
                                                                      of the samples and with the stock solutions to prepare the
                                                                      calibration curves for the HS–SPME–GC–ECD analysis.
                                                                      Quadruplicate injections of an equimolar mixture of the car-
Experimental                                                          boxylic acid derivatives obtained by this procedure showed rela-
                                                                      tive standard deviations (RSDs) below 0.5% for their retention
Reagents and materials                                                times.
  Pentafluorobenzyl bromide, pentafluorophenylhydrazine,                 Poly(acrylate)-coated (85 µm) SPME fibers were used to sample
butanoic, pentanoic, hexanoic, and benzoic acids, as well as          the pentafluorobenzyl esters of the carboxylic acids formed in
ethanal, propanal, butanal, pentanal, hexanal, octanal, nonanal,      aqueous solution by reaction with PFBBr. The sampling condi-
and decanal were obtained at 99% or higher purity from Aldrich        tions were established after a comparative study of the amount of
(Milwaukee, WI). Analytical-grade glacial acetic acid, acetone,       PFBBr derivatives extracted when the solution pH (3,7,9), ionic
348
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
strength (0, 100, 150, 200 g/kg NaCl), extraction temperature                detector temperatures were maintained at 250°C and 270°C,
(30°C, 40°C, 60°C), and time (20, 30, 40, 80 min) were varied sys-           respectively. The split ratio was 10:1.
tematically. The extraction was performed by exposure of the fiber              Mass spectra (electron impact at 70 eV) were obtained with an
to the HS of the magnetically stirred (900 rpm) aqueous solution             HP-5890A Series II GC coupled to an HP 5972 MSD, equipped
(2 mL) in 5-mL vials for 40 min at 30°C, after addition of NaCl              with a split/splitless injector (split 1:30) and a data system (HP
(200 g/kg) and pH adjustment (pH = 7).                                       ChemStation) with NBS75K and Wiley 138K mass spectra
                                                                             libraries (John Wiley & Sons, NY, New York). An HP-5MS 50-m ×
Aldehyde determination                                                       0.25-mm (i.d.) capillary column coated with 5% phenyl
   The procedure described by Stashenko et al. (33) was employed             poly(methylsiloxane) (0.25-µm film thickness) was used. The GC
to prepare hydrazone derivatives of the individual aldehydes. A              oven was programmed from 60°C (2 min) to 250°C (2 min) at
PFPH methanolic solution was reacted with a 50% stoichio-                    8°C/min. The temperatures of the ionization chamber and of the
metric excess of each one of the carbonyl compounds. The                     transfer line were 185°C and 285°C, respectively. Mass spectra
                                                                                                                                                     Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
resulting derivatives were used to prepare hidrazone solutions of            and reconstructed chromatograms were obtained by automatic
1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, 30.0, 40.0, and 60.0µM, which were used           scanning in the mass range m/z 40–350 at 3.5 scan/s.
for the external calibration and the identification of the analytes
of interest by comparison of their retention times with those of
the standards.
   The gaseous aldehyde standards were prepared using volu-                  Results and Discussion
metric injection. A measured amount of an aldehyde standard
(C2–C10) was deposited in a Tedlar bag, which contained 3 L of               Analytical methods
zero air, through the septum that these bags have using a                       The analytical methods employed in this work to determine
microsyringe (0.1–1.0 µL). After the sample was prepared, the                carboxylic acids and carbonyl compounds at low concentrations
needle of the SPME syringe was inserted through the septum,                  were designed to obtain high sensitivity and selectivity and to
immediately exposing the PDMS–DVB coating to the analytes.                   include as few steps as possible, in order to make them swift and
After 30 min, the fiber was withdrawn and inserted in the injec-             to decrease the likelihood of cross contamination and analyte
tion port of the GC. The air samples were collected in 3-L Tedlar            loss. The analytes were converted into their pentafluorophenyl or
bags and analyzed following the same procedure.                              pentafluorobenzyl derivatives in order to obtain high sensitivity
                                                                             with the ECD, which in turn reduces the amount of sample
Chromatographic analysis                                                     required for the analysis. The use of SPME for on-fiber derivatiza-
  Sample analysis was carried out in an HP-5890A Series GC                   tion of aldehydes or for HS–SPME sampling of the PFBBr car-
(Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) equipped with split/splitless               boxylic acid derivatives formed in slightly acidic aqueous solution
injection and ECD (63Ni-ECD). The chromatographic data were                  eliminated the steps of solvent extraction and concentration
processed with HP ChemStation A.06.03 software (Hewlett-                     under nitrogen, common to many existing analytical methods.
Packard). The chromatographic column was a DB-5 (J&W                            For the determination of carboxylic acids in air, the sample may
Scientific, Folsom, CA) fused-silica capillary column coated with            be collected in the field and brought to the laboratory in Tedlar
5% phenyl poly(dimethylsiloxane) (30 m × 0.25-mm i.d., with                  bags, or it could be bubbled directly into 2- × 30-mL potassium
0.25-µm df ). Helium (99.995%) was used as the carrier gas (1                carbonate (50 mg/L) solutions. The partial ionization of the car-
mL/min) with a column inlet pressure of 90 kPa. An                           boxylic acids under these conditions diminishes losses because of
argon–methane (9:1 v/v) mixture was used as the auxiliary gas in             volatilization. The recovery calculated after derivatization and
the detection system at 60 mL/min. The oven temperature was                  HS–SPME was near 80% for acetic and hexanoic acids and higher
programmed from 60°C (2 min) to 250°C (2 min) at 8°C/min for                 than 99% for acids of 3-, 4-, and 5-carbon atoms. However, it was
the analysis of the acid derivatives and from 120°C to 250°C (4              very low (6%) for benzoic acid, but the derivatization and
min) at 8°C/min for the hydrazone derivatives. The injector and              HS–SPME extraction showed relatively similar yields for all car-
                                                                             boxylic acids examined, and the trapping in aqueous solution
                                                                             showed lower recoveries for benzoic acid caused by condensation
  Table I. Calibration Data for the Determination of                         losses because of its lower volatility (boiling point = 249°C), rela-
  Carboxylic Acids in Air                                                    tive to the other carboxylic acids examined (for hexanoic acid,
                                                                             boiling point = 205°C). Thus, the recovery calculated for the
                                                         Recovery (%)
                                                                             method, excluding the trapping step (bubbling through potas-
  Carboxylic     LOD         LOQ                                 From        sium carbonate solution), shows high values for all carboxylic
     acid       (µg/m3)     (µg/m3)         R2      Overall   aqueous trap   acids studied (Table I). The calibration curves and response fac-
                                                                             tors for each analyte were calculated from the chromatograms
  Ethanoic       20.16       40.32       0.9994       86           97.2
                                                                             obtained by means of HS–SPME and GC–ECD for esters formed
  Propanoic      11.56       23.11       0.9961       97           94.8
                                                                             from standard acid solutions of different concentrations. Table I
  Butanoic       25.38       50.75       0.9986      100.2         98
  Pentanoic      36.77       73.53       0.9968      100.0         98        contains the calibration curve results for the determination of
  Hexanoic      105.94      211.88       0.9965       88           95.9      carboxylic acids in air. Sub-µg/m3 quantitation limits were
  Benzoic       271.11      542.21       0.9965        6.5         92.4      reached for all carboxylic acids examined, and the linearity of the
                                                                             calibration curves presented R2 values above 0.99 in all cases.
                                                                                                                                             349
                                                                                                                Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
  The identity of the PFBBr carboxylic acid derivatives was                          the combination of SPME sampling with derivatization and chro-
confirmed by MS. Their mass spectra contained molecular ions                         matographic electron capture detection.
with relatively low abundances (1–32%), which is in agreement
with the observations made by Brill (34), who found abundances                       Applications
between 1% and 20%. The base peak in all of the mass spectra of                      Aldehydes at a shoe factory
the PFBBr derivatives was found at m/z 181, assigned to the                            The air in the main floor of a local footwear factory
[C6F5CH2]+ ion. It was accompanied by a signal at m/z 161, corre-                    (Bucaramanga, Colombia) was sampled in two areas that corre-
sponding to a loss of HF from the pentafluorobenzyl fragment.                        sponded to two distinct manufacturing operations. In area 1, the
  Aldehyde determination by on-fiber derivatization with PFPH                        leather pieces are mounted and glued around the shoe frame-
has been showed to permit femtogram-level detection limits                           works, and edges are burned off. In area 2, outsoles are lacquered,
(31,33). The method previously developed in our laboratory was                       and cleaning agents are applied to remove impurities and provide
applied to the air samples contained in Tedlar bags. Synthetic air                   luster to the leather. All eight aldehydes were detected at concen-
                                                                                                                                                                         Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
samples containing known amounts of aldehydes were used to                           trations that could cause allergies and discomfort to the workers.
determine the fiber exposure time and PFPH load amounts most                         In contrast, a duplicate determination of aldehydes in air from a
appropriate to the analyte levels examined. These samples were                       pedestrian sidewalk at our university campus did not detect any of
also employed to construct the calibration curves (Table II). Very                   these aldehydes at concentrations above the method’s detection
good linearity (R2 > 0.99) was achieved for all the aldehydes                        limit. Air sampling (two Tedlar bags per site) was performed on a
studied, and their quantitation levels were in the sub-ng/m3                         Friday afternoon, at the end of the working day (5 p.m.) and week.
range.                                                                               Table III contains the aldehyde concentrations found in the air at
  The novelty of the methods applied in this work to the determi-                    the two sampled factory sites. However, the NIOSH-recom-
nation of polar contaminants in diverse sample matrices resides                      mended time-weighted average exposure limits for acetaldehyde
in the particular conjugation of rather simple setups, a smaller                     (324 mg/m3) and pentanal (175 mg/m3) were above the concen-
number of steps, shorter experimental time, and lower environ-                       trations determined at the footwear factory. Currently, there are
mental impact (negligible solvent consumption) to achieve high                       no NIOSH recommended limits for workplace exposure to the
selectivity and sensitivity. These advantages result primarily from                  other aldehydes studied (35).
                                                                                     Aldehydes and carboxylic acids in car exhaust
  Table II. Calibration Parameters for the Determination of                            The exhaust fumes from two compact cars with 4-cycle com-
  Aldehydes in Air                                                                   bustion engines, with and without catalytic converter, were sam-
                                                                                     pled by means of a 1-m stainless steel tube (0.8-mm i.d.) inserted
                        LOD                LOQ                                       10 cm into their exhaust pipes. The stainless steel tube was con-
  Aldehyde             (ng/m3)            (ng/m3)          R2         Recovery (%)
                                                                                     nected to the air sampling Tedlar bag by means of Teflon tubing
  Ethanal                0.111              0.222        0.9989            98
  Propanal               0.129              0.257        0.9983            98         Table IV. Concentration of Carboxylic Acids and
  Butanal                0.128              0.256        0.9983            98         Aldehydes Found in Car Exhaust Gases
  Pentanal               0.151              0.302        0.9980            98
  Hexanal                0.160              0.320        0.9989            98                                                      Concentration (mg/m3)*
  Octanal                0.036              0.073        0.9979            98
  Nonanal                0.035              0.069        0.9980            99                                                Without                     With
  Decanal                0.298              0.596        0.9968            99         Acid                              catalytic converter       catalytic converter
                                                                                      Acetic                                  43.6 ± 0.90               5 ± 3.1
                                                                                      Propanoic                                 6.2 ± 0.17            0.0 ± 0.1
  Table III. Concentration of Aldehydes in Air at Two                                 Butanoic                                  8.8 ± 0.25         0.053 ± 0.0063
  Sections of a Footwear Factory                                                      Pentanoic                              0.217 ± 0.0070         0.18 ± 0.017
                                                                                      Hexanoic                                0.20 ± 0.011         0.045 ± 0.0045
                                             Concentration (ng/m3)*                   Benzoic                                 2.10 ± 0.070         0.274 ± 0.0022
         Aldehyde                        Site 1                   Site 2              Aldehyde                                       Concentration (ng/m3)*
         Ethanal                     54 ± 4.3                  53 ± 1.2               Ethanal                                 800 ± 140              430 ± 15
         Propanal                    58 ± 1.7                103.3 ± 0.93             Propanal                                170 ± 20               160 ± 19
         Butanal                     9.8 ± 0.37                7.2 ± 0.21             Butanal                                 100 ± 14               54.1 ± 0.81
         Pentanal                    15 ± 1.1                 15.4 ± 0.66             Pentanal                                250 ± 25               100 ± 1.5
         Hexanal                     12 ± 1.1                 13.2 ± 0.37             Hexanal                                   33 ± 3.4              73 ± 2.5
         Octanal                     10 ± 1.1                  8.0 ± 0.26             Octanal                                 15.2 ± 0.85             47 ± 5.0
         Nonanal                    11.0 ± 0.84               13.4 ± 0.20             Nonanal                                  110 ± 16               12 ± 1.8
         Decanal                     34 ± 2.4                 25.8 ± 0.50             Decanal                                   64 ± 5.0              19 ± 3.1
  * Average concentration ± s (n = 2).                                                * Average concentration ± s (n = 2).
350
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
sufficient in length (6 m) to cool down the air before its admission             in the concentrations of acetic and propionic acids, which varied
into the sampling bag. The Teflon tubing also served to trap most                by factors of up to three-fold. Blanks of the shoes, talc, cotton
of the particulate matter released by the car without a catalytic                insole, and aqueous solution employed in the extraction of
converter, which formed a dark deposit on the tubing walls. Very                 the insole revealed the presence of small amounts of esters
few particulates reached the bag, but none reached the impingers                 of acetic and propionic acids as contaminants of the derivatization
used to trap the carboxylic acids. The car with a catalytic con-                 reagent. Benzoic acid (40 mg/kg) was found in the aqueous
verter did not release particulate matter. Table IV shows the con-               extract (100 mL, 37°C) of the sport shoe employed in the
centrations of aldehydes and carboxylic acids found in duplicate                 study. This indicates that the shoe materials contributed to the
samples taken from the car exhausts. The NIOSH-permissible                       benzoic acid determined in the volunteer’s foot sweat. However,
exposure limits (8-h time-weighted averages) for acetic,                         GC–MS studies have documented the presence of benzoic
propanoic, and pentanoic acids were 25, 30, and 176 mg/m3,                       acid among 346 different compounds collected from human skin
respectively (36). The C3 and C4 carboxylic acids were the species               emanations (37–39). Indeed, samples of foot sweat from volun-
                                                                                                                                                                    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
most effectively reduced by the catalytic converter, and the acetic              teers who used talc showed a 60% decrease in benzoic acid
acid emissions were practically the same in both types of cars                   concentration. Thus, the benzoic acid determined in foot sweat
sampled. Figure 1 presents chromatographic profiles for the                      samples resulted from metabolism and contributions from the
PFBBr ester derivates of carboxylic acids in an aqueous solution                 shoe materials.
and in the exhaust fumes from the car without a catalytic con-
verter. On the other hand, all aldehydes examined were found at a                Breath analysis
lower concentration in the exhaust from the car with a catalytic                   The on-fiber derivatization method was used for the
converter.                                                                       HS–SPME–GC–ECD determination of aldehydes in human
                                                                                 breath. SPME breath sampling was performed with a device in
Carboxylic acids in foot sweat                                                   which the SPME holder was attached to the end of a glass tube
  During a separate forensic research project conducted in our                   equipped with a side arm, similar to that employed by Grote and
laboratory, five male volunteers were asked to wear sport shoes for              Pawliszyn (40). After placing the other end of the glass tube in
8 h and a cotton-gauze insole within their socks, maintained in                  their lips, volunteers held their breath for 10 s and then slowly
close contact with their feet by means of plastic wrap. After the                released it through the glass tube and over the PFPH-loaded
insole was collected from the volunteers, it was cut into 2-cm                   SPME fiber for 50 s. The procedure was repeated five times, for a
strips. A weighed strip was transferred to a 25-mL flask and                     total period of 10 min.
extracted with HPLC-grade water (25 mL) for 1 h at room tem-                       The PFPH-loaded PDMS–DVB (65 µm) SPME fiber was exposed
perature. An aliquot (9 mL) of this extract was subjected to the                 (10 min) to the breath of individuals before and after smoking or
PFBBr derivatization and HS–SPME sampling procedure
described in the Carboxylic acid determination section. Table V
                                                                                   Table V. Concentration of Low-Molecular-Weight
shows that acetic, propionic, and benzoic acids were the most
                                                                                   Carboxylic Acids Found in Foot Sweat from Five Male
abundant carboxylic acids in the volunteers’ foot sweat.                           Volunteers
Volunteers presented concentration profiles that differed mainly
                                                                                                          Carboxylic acid concentration (mg/kg)
                                                                                   Volunteers    C2           C3        C4        C5        C6       Benzoic
                                                                                       A        432.1        46.4       1.6       2.6       2.6         7.4
                                                                                       B        585.8        41.7       1.2       2.0       1.3        15.3
                                                                                       C        233.1        96.4       1.1       1.3       0.9        24.4
                                                                                       D        460.9        28.3       1.1       2.0       1.2        19.7
                                                                                       E        256.7        87.3       0.1       0.0       0.3        22.1
 Figure 1. Gas chromatograms obtained for esters after the acid derivatization    Figure 2. Chromatographic profile obtained with ECD of the PFPH-hydrazone
 with PFBBr for: a standard aqueous solution (42µM) (A) and an exhaust gas        derivatives of aldehydes present in the breath of a volunteer before and after
 sample obtained from a car without a catalytic converter (B).                    the ingestion of 200 mL of red wine.
                                                                                                                                                              351
                                                                                                       Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
                                                                                Acknowledgments
                                                                                  Financial support from Colciencias (Grant 1102-05012401) is
                                                                                gratefully acknowledged.
                                                                                References
                                                                                 1. Ch.-J. Chien, M.J., Charles, K.G. Sexton, and H.E. Jeffries. Analysis of
                                                                                    airborne carboxylic acids and phenols as their pentafluorobenzyl
                                                                                    derivatives: gas chromatography/ion trap mass spectrometry with a
                                                                                    novel chemical ionization reagent, PFBOH. Environ. Sci. Technol.
                                                                                                                                                                Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
                                                                                    32: 299–309 (1998).
                                                                                 2. E. Dabek-Zlotorzynska and M. McGrath. Determination of low-
                                                                                    molecular-weight carboxylic acids in the ambient air and vehicle
 Figure 3. Typical chromatographic profile obtained with ECD of the                 emissions: a review. Fresenius’ J. Anal. Chem. 367: 507–18 (2000).
 PFPH–hydrazone derivatives of aldehydes present in the breath of a volunteer    3. S.S.H. Ho and J.Z. Yu. Feasibility of collection and analysis of air-
 after smoking a complete cigarette.                                                borne carbonyls by on-sorbent derivatization and thermal desorp-
                                                                                    tion. Anal. Chem. 74(6): 1232–40 (2002).
                                                                                 4. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Compendium of
wine consumption. Figure 2 shows the variation of the chro-                         Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds in
matographic profile as a function of time after the ingestion                       Ambient Air, 2nd ed. Ohio EPA, Center for Environmental Research
of 200 mL of red wine. The crest in acetaldehyde released at                        Information, Cincinnati, OH, June, 1999.
                                                                                 5. K. Dettmer and W. Engewald. Adsorbent materials commonly used
60 min agrees with the known ethanol metabolic process in the
                                                                                    in air analysis for adsorptive enrichment and thermal desorption of
human body. Figure 3 contains a typical chromatographic profile                     volatile organic compounds. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 373: 490–500
of the breath of a volunteer after smoking a full cigarette.                        (2002).
Methanal, ethanal, propanal, and traces of pentanal were                         6. N. Masqué, M. Galià, R.M. Marcé, and F. Borrull. Functionalized
detected. Because the derivatives are obtained as the E and Z iso-                  polymeric sorbents for solid-phase extraction of polar pollutants.
                                                                                    J. High Resolt. Chromatogr. 22(10): 547–52 (1999).
mers, the most intense peak of each pair was used for quantitation
                                                                                 7. J. Hollender, F. Sandner, M. Möller, and W. Dott. Sensitive indoor air
purposes.                                                                           monitoring of monoterpenes using different adsorbents and thermal
                                                                                    desorption gas chromatography with mass-selective detection.
Carboxylic acids in rain                                                            J. Chromatogr. A 962: 175–81 (2002).
  Two combined samples were formed with 50-mL rain water                         8. F. Sandner, W. Dott, and J. Hollender. Sensitive indoor air monitoring
                                                                                    of formaldehyde and other carbonyl compounds using the 2,4-dini-
samples collected at five spots that corresponded with the
                                                                                    trophenylhydrazine method. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 203:
corners and the center of a 100-m square. The combined samples                      275–79 (2001).
were subjected to the PFBBr derivatization procedure (see                        9. A. Sakuragawa, T. Yoneno, and T. Okutani. Trace analysis of carbonyl
Carboxylic acid determination section) and the chromatographic                      compounds by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry after col-
analysis of the derivatives thus formed showed that acetic                          lection as 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine derivatives. J. Chromatogr. A
                                                                                    844(1-2): 403–408 (1999).
acid was the single carboxylic acid present, at a concentration of
                                                                                10. A. Levart and M. Veber. Determination of aldehydes and ketones in
113 ± 8.3µM.                                                                        air samples using cryotrapping sampling. Chemosphere. 44:
                                                                                    701–708 (2001).
                                                                                11. D.W. Lehmpuhl and J.W. Birks. New gas chromatographic-electron
                                                                                    capture detection method for the determination of atmospheric alde-
Conclusion                                                                          hydes and ketones based on cartridge sampling and derivatization
                                                                                    with 2,4,6-trichlorophenylhydrazine. J. Chromatogr A 740: 71–81
  The analysis methods employed in this work were based on the                      (1996).
                                                                                12. A. Cecinato, V. Di Palo, R. Mabilia, and M. Possanzini.
combination of SPME sampling with the derivatization of low-
                                                                                    Pentafluorophenylhydrazine as a coating reagent for the HRGC-MS
molecular-weight carboxylic acids or carbonyl compounds to                          determination of semi-volatile carbonyl compounds in air.
pentafluorophenyl or pentafluorobenzyl analogs to form simple                       Chromatographia. 54: 263–69 (2001).
analytical procedures with few steps and solvent-free extraction                13. C.G. Nolte, M.P. Fraser, and G.R. Cass. Gas phase C2–C10 organic
with no evaporation routines. The minimum levels of detection                       acids concentrations in the Los Angeles atmosphere. Environ. Sci.
                                                                                    Technol. 33(4): 540–45 (1999).
(signal-to-noise = 5) of the method for carboxylic acids were
                                                                                14. K. Kawamura, L.-L. Ng, and I.R. Kaplan. Determination of organic
between 0.028 and 0.0185µM for aqueous matrices and between                         acids (C1 – C10) in the atmosphere, motor exhausts, and engine oils.
20.16 and 271.1 µg/m3 for gaseous matrices. The analysis of alde-                   Environ. Sci. Technol. 19(11): 1082–86 (1985).
hydes in air reached detection limits in the ng/m3 range. The use               15. S.R. Souza and L.R.F. Carvalho. Seasonality influence in the distribu-
of Tedlar bags in combination with SPME constitutes a very fast,                    tion of formic and acetic acids in the urban atmosphere of São Paulo,
                                                                                    Brazil. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 12(6): 755–62 (2001).
simple, and reproducible technique for monitoring VOCs. The
                                                                                16. A.G. Allen and A.H. Miguel. Biomass burning in the Amazon—
examples presented in this work illustrate the easy and diverse                     characterization of the ionic component of aerosols generated from
applications of these solvent-free, clean, and highly sensitive                     flaming and smoldering rain-forest and savanna. Environ. Sci.
methodologies to various fields of research.                                        Technol. 29(2): 486–93 (1995).
352
Journal of Chromatographic Science, Vol. 44, July 2006
17. W.F. Rogge, M.A. Mazurek, L.M. Hildemann, G.R. Cass, and                30. M.-R. Lee, Y. Yao-Chia, W.-S. Hsiang, and H. Bao-Huey. Solid-phase
    B.R.T. Simoneit. Quantification of urban organic aerosols at a molec-       microextraction and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for
    ular level: identification, abundance and seasonal variation. Atmos.        determining chlorophenols from landfill leaches and soil.
    Environ. 27A: 1309–30 (1993).                                               J. Chromatogr. A 806: 317–24 (1998).
18. K.S. Docherty and P.J. Ziemann. On-line, inlet-based trimethylsilyl     31. E.E. Stashenko, M.A. Puertas, W. Salgar, W. Delgado, and
    derivatization for gas chromatography of mono- and dicarboxylic             J.R. Martínez. Solid-phase microextraction with on-fibre derivatisa-
    acids. J. Chromatogr. A 921: 265–75 (2001).                                 tion applied to the analysis of volatile carbonyl compounds.
19. D. Grosjean. Atmospheric chemistry of toxic contaminants, 1.                J. Chromatogr. A 886: 175–81 (2000).
    Reaction rates and atmospheric persistence. J. Air Waste Manage.        32. F.K. Kawahara. Microdetermination of pentafluorobenzyl ester
    Assoc. 40: 1397–1402 (1990).                                                derivatives of organic acids by means of electron capture gas chro-
20. K. Blau and J.M. Halket. Handbook of Derivates for                          matography. Anal. Chem. 40(13): 2073–75 (1968).
    Chromatography, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1993,          33. E.E. Stashenko, M.C. Ferreira, L.G. Sequeda, J.R. Martínez, and
    p. 369.                                                                     J.W. Wong. Comparison of extraction methods and HRGC-ECD and
21. J. You, W. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. Simple derivatization method for            HRGC-MSD-SIM techniques for the determination of volatile car-
    sensitive determination of fatty acids with fluorescence detection by       bonyl compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 779: 360 (1997).
                                                                                                                                                         Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/chromsci/article-abstract/44/6/347/373686 by guest on 20 May 2020
    high-performance liquid chromatography using 9-(2-hydroxyethyl)-        34. J.H. Brill, B.A. Narayanan, and J.P. McCormick. Selective determina-
    carbazole as derivatization reagent. Anal. Chim. Acta 436: 163–72           tion of pentaluorobenzyl ester derivatives of carboxylic acids by GC
    (2001).                                                                     using microwave plasma and mass selective detection. Appl.
22. K. Kawamura and K. Usukura. Distributions of low molecular weight           Spectrosc. 45(10): 1617–20 (1991).
    dicarboxylic acids in the North Pacific aerosol samples. J. Oceanogr.   35. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health.
    49: 271–83 (1993).                                                          Carcinogenicity of acetaldehyde and malonaldehyde, and muta-
23. K. Kawamura. Identification of C2–C10 ω-oxocarboxylic acids,                genicity of related low-molecular-weight aldehydes. Current
    pyruvic acid, and C2–C3 ω-dicarbonyls in wet precipitation and              Intelligence Bulletin 55: 166–67 (1991).
    aerosol samples by capillary GC and GC/MS. Anal. Chem. 65(23):          36. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Pocket
    3505–11 (1993).                                                             Guide to Chemical Hazards. Publication No. 2005-151. Available at
24. K. Kawamura and K. Ikushima. Seasonal changes in the distribution           http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/npgd0652.html, National Institute of
    of dicarboxylic acids in the urban atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol.       Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, (2005).
    27(10): 2227–35 (1993).                                                 37. U. Bernier, D. Kline, D.R. Barnard, C.E. Schreck, and R.A. Yost.
25. J.E. Lawrence and P. Koutrakis. Measurement and speciation of gas           Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass
    and particulate phase organic acidity in an urban environment 1.            spectrometry. 2. Identification of volatile compounds that are candi-
    Analytical. J. Geophys. Res. 101(D4): 9159–70 (1996).                       date attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti). Anal.
26. J.E. Lawrence and P. Koutrakis. Measurement and speciation of gas           Chem. 72: 747–56 (2000).
    and particulate phase organic acidity in an urban environment 2.        38. X.-N. Zeng, J.J. Leyden, H.J. Lawley, K. Sawano, I. Nohara, and
    Speciation. J. Geophys. Res. 101(D4): 9159–70 (1996).                       G. Preti. Analysis of characteristic odors from human male axillae.
27. P.A Martos and J. Pawliszyn. Calibration of solid phase microextrac-        J. Chem. Ecol. 17: 1469–91 (1991).
    tion for air analyses based on physical chemical properties of the      39. X.-N. Zeng, J.J. Leyden, J.G. Brand, A.I. Spielman, K.J. McGinley, and
    coating. Anal. Chem. 69: 206–15 (1997).                                     G. Preti. An investigation of human apocrine gland secretion for axil-
28. J.A. Koziel, J. Noah, and J. Pawliszyn. Field sampling and determina-       lary odor precursors. J. Chem. Ecol. 18: 1039–55 (1992).
    tion of formaldehyde in indoor air with solid-phase microextraction     40. C. Grote and J. Pawliszyn. Microextraction for the analysis of human
    and on-fiber derivatization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35: 1481–86             breath. Anal. Chem. 69: 587–96 (1997).
    (2001).
29. L. Pan and J. Pawliszyn. Derivatization/solid-phase microextraction:                   Manuscript received September 17, 2005;
    new approach to polar analytes. Anal. Chem. 69: 196–205 (1997).                          revision received January 12, 2006.
                                                                                                                                                 353