0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views8 pages

Reading Noah and The Flood Through The Source Theory Lens

The document discusses reading the story of Noah and the flood through the lens of Source Theory, which proposes that there were originally two distinct flood stories in Genesis that were later combined by an editor. When the verses are separated based on whether they refer to God as "the LORD" or simply "God", two coherent stories emerge from the J source and P source. Reading the story as two separate accounts can help resolve some logical inconsistencies, and the editor chose to weave the stories together rather than fully harmonize them, intentionally leaving clues to both stories. Source Theory provides another layer of understanding to the story without denying its inspiration.

Uploaded by

Tim Lane
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views8 pages

Reading Noah and The Flood Through The Source Theory Lens

The document discusses reading the story of Noah and the flood through the lens of Source Theory, which proposes that there were originally two distinct flood stories in Genesis that were later combined by an editor. When the verses are separated based on whether they refer to God as "the LORD" or simply "God", two coherent stories emerge from the J source and P source. Reading the story as two separate accounts can help resolve some logical inconsistencies, and the editor chose to weave the stories together rather than fully harmonize them, intentionally leaving clues to both stories. Source Theory provides another layer of understanding to the story without denying its inspiration.

Uploaded by

Tim Lane
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

Reading Noah and the flood through the Source Theory Lens
What happens if we follow the wisdom of Source Theory and accept a notion that
there actually are two distinct flood stories in Genesis that were intertwined by
some unknown editor? We can fairly easily reconstitute the two stories if we
simply separate out the verses based upon how they refer to God. Remember,
in the J-Source, God is referred to by His Name, YHWH, which is usually
translated into our English Christian Bibles as “the LORD” or “the LORD GOD.” The
P-Source usually refers to God by the generic word “God.” Without doing any
other editing or rearranging, we can see one possible way that the Noah story
might divide out:

J-Source - Genesis 6:5-8; 7:1-9a, 10, 12, 16b-17a, 22-23; 8:2b-


3a, 6-13b, 20-22

P-Source - Genesis 6:9-22; 7:9b-11, 13-16a, 17b-21, 24; 8:1-2a,


3b-5, 13a, 14-19; 19:1-17.

I have arranged the text of the Revised Standard Version of Genesis 6-9 below
according to this J-Source/P-Source schema and then placed them in parallel so
that you can see how the two stories compare with each other. You can judge
for yourself whether each of the 2 stories flows well when separated along a J/P
pattern.1

In general, besides referring to God as “the LORD,” the God of the J-Source is
described in anthropomorphic terms – He is a very hands on Creator God, very
(physically) active in creation. The God of the P-Source is more transcendent –
distant from His creation and a supreme ruler from on high. If you follow the
two Source Theory, you also realize in the:

J-Source - The building of the ark is not described; Noah is


instructed to take 7 pair of clean animals in the ark but only 1 pair
of unclean animals; Noah is to take his unnamed Sons, wife and
daughters-in-law in the ark; Noah is 600 years old when the flood

1
While there is a lot of agreement among Source Theorists about the two sources that
contributed to the Flood story, there is not a 100% agreement among Biblical scholars
precisely how to separate the text between the J-Source and the P-Source. I based my
editing almost entirely on the text referring to “God” or “the LORD.” Obviously a phrase
here or there (especially the transitional phrases between the two sources) could go
either way or actually could go both ways. But you get the big picture of how the Flood
story reads as two stories woven together. It is also possible that the editor of the text
moved some verses around so that the text would flow better in its final edited/woven
form. Two verses that seem possibly out of place when the story is separated into two
versions are: 7:16 in the J-Source which seems to fit more naturally after 7:9, and in the
P-Source 7:17 seems as if would flow perfectly from the end of 7:11.

1
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

begins; Noah, et al, are in the ark 7 days before the flood actually
begins; the flood is caused by a rain storm which lasts 40 days,
the waters basically cover the tree tops (but not the mountain tops
as they do in the P-Source), and on the 61st day after entering the
ark, Noah leaves the ark.

P-Source - The building of the ark is given very specific detail; the
names of Noah’s sons are provided; two of each kind of animal is
to be taken in the ark; food for all is to be put in the ark; a
covenant between God and humans will be established
(covenants are indicative that the verses come from the hand of
the P-Source); that Noah “did as God commanded” is a repeating
refrain in the story (in Genesis 1 also a P-Source story there is the
repeating refrain “and God saw that it was good”); exact day of
the year and day of the week is provided for the beginning and
end of the story (as in Genesis 1 where God creates the world in
exactly 7 days); it is the deeps above and below the earth which
burst forth with the cataclysmic flood waters – not just a rainstorm,
but the waters of Genesis 1 which were contained by God so the
dry earth could come into existence are suddenly let loose again;
the flood occurs on the very day Noah enters the ark, not 7 days
later as in the J-Source; the flood waters rise above the mountain
tops; the flood waters increase for 150 days; Noah, et al, are in
the ark a total of 340 days

In rearranging the stories this way we are not denying the inspiration of either
story, nor are we denying the inspiration of the editor who wove the two stories
together. Following Source Theory can simply help us deal with some of the
logical and narrative inconsistencies in the story. The reason the details in
Genesis 6-9 seem disjointed at points or inconsistent is that they actually were
derived from two different stories. What is also significant is that the final editor
of the Bible did not see a need to totally harmonize the two stories – but did
weave them together even though their details do not seamlessly correlate. By
not harmonizing the two stories, he left us plenty of clues to the existence of both
stories – perhaps he did this intentionally as He found both stories inspiring and
revelatory. He wanted to have the Scripture read as one narrative, but then kept
details from each story which cannot be reconciled. Apparently he had no divine
direction to eliminate the differences in the details. So we need to ask ourselves
why do set out to harmonize the differences when the inspired editor of the Bible
did not?

We of course cannot know if there were any parts of the original two stories that
he simply deleted. We also cannot know if any parts of the story were in total
agreement and therefore he could pick either of the two to include in his final
blended version. Source Theory takes seriously every word of the text. It
however does not try to find a way to show all the sentences are literally

2
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

consistent with each other. Sometimes the only way to read the text absolutely
literally requires the reader to do “violence” to the text – change its plain meaning
so much so that the differences in the story appear not to be differences. It
seems in some literal interpretations one has to do mental gymnastics to force
the text to be literally consistent. The final editor of the biblical text did not
attempt to rid the story of its differences and inconsistencies. So why do we think
we should explain them away or eliminate them by forcing an interpretation on
them which unnaturally does away with the literal differences? They were left in
the text by a man inspired by God, and for a purpose. Let us recognize that, and
deal with all of the verses, all of their variations and all of their implications.

Since the story of the flood is given as one continuous story in our Scriptures, we
will most often read it that way. The story was not handed down to us in the form
of two parallel stories, but rather different pieces of the two stories were
contiguously placed to have us read it as one “chronological” narrative. The
differences in the stories have certainly given Scripture commentators much to
comment on as they attempted to harmonize the differences in the stories, and
these efforts have given many great insights into both the Scriptures and into the
nature of God. The same happens if we read the text as two distinct stories
which have been woven together. Since the Patristic writers always assumed
that every detail of the Bible is important for gaining wisdom and understanding,
they might have found the insight of Source Theory to be one more layer of depth
to the Scriptures. Reading the story of Noah and the Flood as two distinct stories
is really no different than reading the 4 Gospels as a basic telling of the same
story from 4 distinct perspectives (as sometimes the details of the Gospel
according to the 4 evangelists do not agree).

Generally, when reading Scripture, if you accept it as the inspired word of God,
you can have a couple of different approaches when you encounter
“inconsistencies” in the test. A) You can accept a notion that the text is
inspired and therefore the inconsistencies are apparent but not real. This
requires then developing an interpretive method in which you find a way to
harmonize the differences – explain them away, spiritualize them, show in some
way that they are not in fact inconsistent. The Patristic writers frequently
attempted this method as have modern believers who demand that the text be
read literally. B) You can also sort out the differences to see if the
“inconsistencies” might be explained by there being more than one
author/editor/story contributing to the narrative. This is an interpretive method in
which you decide not to harmonize the differences, but to accept them as
contributing to our understanding of God and His revelation. This method is also
frequently used by the Patristic writers (though they never conceived of a
different source idea, they did believe that all the differences were placed in the
text intentionally by the Holy Spirit and were part of the depth and richness of
Scriptures which we are to discover). It is also the method of many modern
Biblical scholars. This method tends to assume a non-literal reading of the text
and says the importance is not in the literal reading of the text, the importance

3
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

lies in the grand revelation which we encounter in the Scriptures. This generally
means we are looking for a deeper meaning beyond the “plain” reading of the
words. Even when the Patristic writers accepted the Genesis narrative as
literally true, they always also and simultaneously believed the text had much
more significance than its “plain” meaning. They frequently looked for the not-so-
obvious or hidden meaning of the text – and certainly the notion of more than one
author remained hidden from them! But they advocated digging deep into the
text until all of its meanings were revealed. They always assumed the text had
some relationship to and revelation about Christ, and only in Christ would the full
meaning of the text be revealed.

Is separating out the received text into two separate stories ever an “Orthodox”
way of approaching Scripture? One need only think about the “Composite” Old
Testament Paramoia which are read during Vespers on the eve of certain Feasts
to realize Orthodoxy engaged in similar Bible editing in its own communal and
liturgical vocalized reading of Scriptures. Think also of the Gospel Lesson for
the feasts of the Virgin Mary – Luke 10:38-42 is connected to and read
uninterruptedly and continuously with 11:27-28 giving the Orthodox listener the
impression that those texts flow seamlessly and naturally together whereas in
Luke’s Gospel they are not connected at all. The Church thus has on limited
occasions selectively chosen and “re-arranged” verses to fit its own purposes.

The use of ideas from Source Theory are offered here only as one additional tool
in the study of the inspired Scriptures of God. Please remember even the
chapter and verse numbering system in our Bibles is an invention of biblical
scholars as those numbers are not in the original text, and yet they do influence
how we think about and read the Scriptures. We often read a “chapter” at a time,
but that is following an artificial division introduced into the biblical text by
scholars. This numbering system also is a potentially good tool for us, but again
we have to recognize it is a tool, it isn’t Scripture.

4
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

J-source P-source
6:9 These are the generations of Noah. Noah
was a righteous man, blameless in his
generation; Noah walked with God. 10 And
Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
6:5 The LORD saw that the wickedness of man 11 Now the earth was corrupt in God's sight, and
the earth was filled with violence. 12 And God
was great in the earth, and that every
imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only saw the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all
evil continually. 6 And the LORD was sorry that flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth.
13 And God said to Noah, "I have determined to
he had made man on the earth, and it grieved
him to his heart. 7 So the LORD said, "I will blot make an end of all flesh; for the earth is filled
with violence through them; behold, I will destroy
out man whom I have created from the face of
the ground, man and beast and creeping things them with the earth. 14 Make yourself an ark of
and birds of the air, for I am sorry that I have gopher wood; make rooms in the ark, and cover
it inside and out with pitch. 15 This is how you
made them."
are to make it: the length of the ark three
hundred cubits, its breadth fifty cubits, and its
height thirty cubits. 16 Make a roof for the ark,
and finish it to a cubit above; and set the door of
the ark in its side; make it with lower, second,
and third decks. 17 For behold, I will bring a
flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all
flesh in which is the breath of life from under
8 But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD. heaven; everything that is on the earth shall die.
18 But I will establish my covenant with you; and
you shall come into the ark, you, your sons, your
7:1 Then the LORD said to Noah, "Go into the
wife, and your sons' wives with you. 19 And of
ark, you and all your household, for I have seen
every living thing of all flesh, you shall bring two
that you are righteous before me in this
of every sort into the ark, to keep them alive with
generation. 2 Take with you seven pairs of all
you; they shall be male and female. 20 Of the
clean animals, the male and his mate; and a pair
birds according to their kinds, and of the animals
of the animals that are not clean, the male and
according to their kinds, of every creeping thing
his mate; 3 and seven pairs of the birds of the
of the ground according to its kind, two of every
air also, male and female, to keep their kind
sort shall come in to you, to keep them alive.
alive upon the face of all the earth. 4 For in
21 Also take with you every sort of food that is
seven days I will send rain upon the earth forty
eaten, and store it up; and it shall serve as food
days and forty nights; and every living thing that
for you and for them."
I have made I will blot out from the face of the
ground."

5 And Noah did all that the LORD had


commanded him. 22 Noah did this; he did all that God
commanded him.

5
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

J-source P-source
7:6 Noah was six hundred years old when the 7:11 In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in
flood of waters came upon the earth. the second month, on the seventeenth day of
the month, on that day all the fountains of the
great deep burst forth, and the windows of the
heavens were opened.
7:7 And Noah and his sons and his wife and his
sons' wives with him went into the ark, to escape 13 On the very same day Noah and his sons,
the waters of the flood. 8 Of clean animals, and Shem and Ham and Japheth, and Noah's wife
and the three wives of his sons with them
of animals that are not clean, and of birds, and
of everything that creeps on the ground, 9 two entered the ark, 14 they and every beast
according to its kind, and all the cattle according
and two, male and female, went into the ark with
Noah, to their kinds, and every creeping thing that
creeps on the earth according to its kind, and
every bird according to its kind, every bird of
every sort. 15 They went into the ark with Noah,
two and two of all flesh in which there was the
breath of life. 16 And they that entered, male
and female of all flesh, went in as God had
commanded him;

7:17 and the waters increased, and bore up the


ark, and it rose high above the earth. 18 The
10 And after seven days the waters of the flood waters prevailed and increased greatly upon the
came upon the earth. earth; and the ark floated on the face of the
waters. 19 And the waters prevailed so mightily
upon the earth that all the high mountains under
7:12 And rain fell upon the earth forty days and
the whole heaven were covered; 20 the waters
forty nights.
prevailed above the mountains, covering them
fifteen cubits deep. 21 And all flesh died that
7:16 and the LORD shut him in. moved upon the earth, birds, cattle, beasts, all
swarming creatures that swarm upon the earth,
and every man; .

7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth a


hundred and fifty days.
7:17 The flood continued forty days upon the
earth

7:22 everything on the dry land in whose nostrils


was the breath of life died. 23 He blotted out
every living thing that was upon the face of the
ground, man and animals and creeping things
and birds of the air; they were blotted out from
8:1 But God remembered Noah and all the
the earth.
beasts and all the cattle that were with him in the
ark. And God made a wind blow over the earth,
Only Noah was left, and those that were with and the waters subsided; 2 the fountains of the
him in the ark. deep and the windows of the heavens were
closed,

6
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

J-source P-source
8:2 the rain from the heavens was restrained, 8:3 At the end of a hundred and fifty days the
3 and the waters receded from the earth waters had abated; 4 and in the seventh month,
continually. on the seventeenth day of the month, the ark
came to rest upon the mountains of Ar'arat.
8:6 At the end of forty days Noah opened the 5 And the waters continued to abate until the
window of the ark which he had made, 7 and tenth month; in the tenth month, on the first day
sent forth a raven; and it went to and fro until the of the month, the tops of the mountains were
waters were dried up from the earth. 8 Then he seen.
sent forth a dove from him, to see if the waters
had subsided from the face of the ground; 9 but 8:13 In the six hundred and first year, in the first
the dove found no place to set her foot, and she month, the first day of the month, the waters
returned to him to the ark, for the waters were were dried from off the earth;
still on the face of the whole earth. So he put
forth his hand and took her and brought her into 8:14 In the second month, on the twenty-
the ark with him. 10 He waited another seven seventh day of the month, the earth was dry.
days, and again he sent forth the dove out of the
ark; 11 and the dove came back to him in the 8:15 Then God said to Noah, 16 "Go forth from
evening, and lo, in her mouth a freshly plucked the ark, you and your wife, and your sons and
olive leaf; so Noah knew that the waters had
your sons' wives with you. 17 Bring forth with
subsided from the earth. 12 Then he waited you every living thing that is with you of all flesh-
another seven days, and sent forth the dove; -birds and animals and every creeping thing that
and she did not return to him any more.
creeps on the earth--that they may breed
abundantly on the earth, and be fruitful and
8:13 and Noah removed the covering of the ark, multiply upon the earth."
and looked, and behold, the face of the ground
was dry.

18 So Noah went forth, and his sons and his 18 So Noah went forth, and his sons and his
wife and his sons' wives with him. 19 And every
wife and his sons' wives with him. 19 And every
beast, every creeping thing, and every bird, beast, every creeping thing, and every bird,
everything that moves upon the earth, went forth everything that moves upon the earth, went forth
by families out of the ark.
by families out of the ark.

7
God Questions His Creation: Reading Noah and the Flood through Source Lens Theory

J-source P-source
9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and
said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the
earth. 2 The fear of you and the dread of you
shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon
8:20 Then Noah built an altar to the LORD, and every bird of the air, upon everything that creeps
on the ground and all the fish of the sea; into
took of every clean animal and of every clean
bird, and offered burnt offerings on the altar. your hand they are delivered. 3 Every moving
thing that lives shall be food for you; and as I
gave you the green plants, I give you everything.
4 Only you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is,
its blood. 5 For your lifeblood I will surely require
a reckoning; of every beast I will require it and of
man; of every man's brother I will require the life
of man. 6 Whoever sheds the blood of man, by
man shall his blood be shed; for God made man
in his own image. 7 And you, be fruitful and
multiply, bring forth abundantly on the earth and
multiply in it."

8 Then God said to Noah and to his sons with


him, 9 "Behold, I establish my covenant with you
and your descendants after you, 10 and with
21 And when the LORD smelled the pleasing every living creature that is with you, the birds,
odor, the LORD said in his heart, "I will never the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you,
again curse the ground because of man, for the as many as came out of the ark. 11 I establish
imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; my covenant with you, that never again shall all
neither will I ever again destroy every living flesh be cut off by the waters of a flood, and
creature as I have done. never again shall there be a flood to destroy the
earth."

12 And God said, "This is the sign of the


covenant which I make between me and you
and every living creature that is with you, for all
future generations: 13 I set my bow in the cloud,
and it shall be a sign of the covenant between
me and the earth. 14 When I bring clouds over
the earth and the bow is seen in the clouds, 15 I
will remember my covenant which is between
22 While the earth remains, seedtime and me and you and every living creature of all flesh;
harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and the waters shall never again become a flood
and night, shall not cease." to destroy all flesh. 16 When the bow is in the
clouds, I will look upon it and remember the
everlasting covenant between God and every
living creature of all flesh that is upon the earth."
17 God said to Noah, "This is the sign of the
covenant which I have established between me
and all flesh that is upon the earth."

You might also like