Robert B. Sklaroff, M.D., F.A.C.P.
Medical Oncology/Hematology Telephone: (215) 333-4900
Smylie Times Building - Suite #500-C Facsimile: (215) 333-2023
8001 Roosevelt Boulevard rsklaroff@gmail.com
Philadelphia, PA 19152-3041 May 4, 2021
To: Gregory Gross <Ggross@pahousegop.com>
Re: Pennsylvania “Forensic Audit” of 2020 POTUS Election [PART VI] - Executive Summary
Executive Summary
Revealed through the ten hearings conducted by the House State Government Committee were
shocking revelations as to the performance of the Department of State during the 2020 election;
that the Department of State impeded the prior (Democrat) Auditor General from completing its
responsibilities was dramatized when he couldn’t verify 70% of the voter records.
The Legislature must now invoke the Navarro paradigm to classify the aberrations that are known
to be extant, even those the Democrat-controlled Supreme Court disingenuously dismissed:
10,000 {a} Absentee ballots cast that arrived after Election Day
14,328 {b} Absentee ballots cast from addresses other than where voters
legally reside
58,221 {c} Absentee ballots cast that were returned on or before the
postmark date
9,005 {d} Absentee ballots cast without a postmark (violating state law)
8,021 {e} Dead voters
742 {f} Double voters: in-state
7,426 {g} Out-of-state voters who voted in-state
202,377 {h} Over-votes (per State Representative Frank Ryan, et al.)
680,774 {i} Poll watcher & poll observer abuse (defying SCOTUS orders)*
1,573 {j} Voters age 100+ (suspect, per state records and obituaries)
The Legislature must initiate a Forensic Audit modeled after that which is underway in Maracopa
County, Arizona (Phoenix), recognizing that the judiciary (including a newly-appointed Democrat)
has not found any rationale to oppose its completion (“after 40 days and 40 nights”).
(a) We know that Absentee ballots were received up to three days after Election Day.
(b) We know the SURE System was unable to track address changes reliably.
(c) We know “confusion” led to aberrations that may have been exacerbated by the U.S.P.S.
(d) We know the 3 a.m. tabulation spike could have been caused by ballot-stuffing.
(e) We know J. Christian Adams had to sue the Commonwealth to expunge deceased voters.
(f) We know voters who received multiple ballots may have returned them.
(g) We know the Address-Change and EPIC Systems were not consistently employed.
(h) We know, c/o a State Rep. harboring extensive experience, over-votes occurred.
(i) We know observers were denied meaningful oversight in fraudulent-Philadelphia.
(j) We know that the absence of purged voter rolls allows for voting by centarians.
1
Regarding these issues, it was felt that “Legislatures have both the ability to intervene in some of
this litigation when necessary, and then also to ensure that that litigation cannot result in
settlements or consent decrees that lead to the promulgation of regulations that fundamentally
countermand or undermine established law.” {8} Similarly, legislatures can manifest intent to
discern optimal election law in 2022 by mandating a Forensic Audit of what transpired in 2020.
Audits are occurring and are projected to occur throughout America
Arizona counting staff on NDA's revealed a preliminary audit showed Trump ahead by 250,000;
as it nears completion, nearly 950,000 ballots have been declared illegal, nearly all for Biden.
Recall Biden's victory margin in Arizona was 10,200.
https://www.simonparkes.org/post/arizona-preliminary-numbers
This is an entreaty to seek adoption of a resolution by the PA Legislature ASAP seeking conduction
of a Forensic Audit of the 2020 election, pursuant to its Constitutional authority and responsibility
to provide oversight. The focus of the ten hearings conducted by the House State Government
Committee was on proposing legislation, but any patina of bipartisanship was shattered by
Davidson/Kenyatta {*10}; therefore, the legislative goal must be upgraded to allow for the
legislature to reassess its choice of Presidential Electors, as may soon occur in Arizona/Georgia.
Conclusions herein are tethered to information meticulously gleaned from the ten hearings, and
are then crossruffed with Peter Navarro‘s decalogue of aberrations. Previously “open” hyperlinks
are embedded to minimize flow interruption, and citations to the 5/1/2021 memo are rendered
unobtrusive by being linked to evidence presented on each hearing date {*denoted in braces}:
{1} Jan. 21: Department of State.
{2} Jan. 28: Election information technology (SURE System).
{3} Feb. 11: Election Audits: Office of the Auditor General, 2% Audits, and Risk-Limiting Audits.
{4} March 4: Voter registration.
{5} March 10: Voting machines (certification, operation, contracted vendors).
{6} March 18: Mail-in and absentee ballots.
{7} March 25: County election day operations.
{8} April 1: Election integrity and accessibility.
{9} April 8: How other states conduct elections.
{10} April 15: Stakeholders and member testimony.
This is the culmination of painstakingly detailed efforts to “show homework” as emerged seriatim
in four prior memos that (a)—summarized key concerns regarding the electoral process; (b)—
homed in on events in Pennsylvania; (c)—defined the hearings database; and (d)—generated the
database from 1000+ pages of testimony plus appended documents. {Prior memos appended.}
This distillation serves as the basis for seeking an urgent FORENSIC AUDIT, at the very least in
Philadelphia; as per our e-mail exchange and the first five memos [4/27/2021 & 4/28/2021 x2,
5/1/2021, 5/2/2021], the database has been reviewed to support the advice by Tony Schaffer
that “Pennsylvania must act PRUDENLY to conduct audits [and to] review process and procedures
of the 2020 election.” In the alternative, explicit conclusions drawn in the Pennsylvania Report
(derivative of the Election Integrity: Recommendations Report which itself conveys exhaustive
citations) should be honored to generate a statewide roadmap by auditing five counties.
2
It has been postulated that Adjudication of W.I.M.P. (the sum of write-in and minor party ballots)
votes may have provided the Hologram’s Margin of Victory; this piece presents proof the Election
was stolen and posits that the ability to “Reveal the Steal” arises because Mail-In Ballot Math
Doesn't Add Up for Biden. It mentions that other audits are likely in Georgia, New Hampshire,
and Wisconsin; Steve Bannon suggested that a filing based upon Antrim County is imminent in
Michigan, and he name-drops others that include Nevada, Virginia and Texas.
Teddy Daniels—a 2022 GOP Congressional candidate (8th District)—has highlighted “lack of
transparency, lack of procedure, laws being arbitrarily changed without legislative approval, and
votes taking WAY longer than necessary to count.” Thus, he advocated auditing three counties
(Luzerne, Philadelphia and Alleghany) counties in a fashion consistent with Arizona’s audit.
2020 Kathy Barnett's canvassing efforts uncovered 78,000 phantom votes just in Montgomery
County including two deceased voters; these data were leaked c/o data analyst, Bobby Piton.
Lobbying Legislators
The petition being circulated by #AuditTheVotePa provides numerous legislative loose-ends along
with concerns detailed during the recent hearings [https://auditthevotepa.com/?fbclid=IwAR3-
IkowMxbhmNu5AXlTCHkIheXIIouKdFn87xFTOz1SqtqhaASgPaOCS5c]; it is chuck-full of so much
relevant information that it is reprinted in its entirety [annotated] to motivate legislators:
To all Pennsylvania Representatives and Senators,
I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and the other 10,000+ PA residents
who have attached their signature. We are reaching out to voice our concern over
the Pennsylvania 2020 election process, procedures, and alleged fraud to restore
confidence in our entire election process moving forward.
I speak on behalf of everyone who signed this letter when I say we are extremely
disappointed at not just the handling of the election irregularities, but also what
appears to be the blatant disregard for the rule of law in our home state. The
Pennsylvania Supreme Court system allowed former Secretary of State, Kathy
Boockvar, to make last minute changes to Act 77, which in and of itself is a
disaster. We now know that many of you did not even read the entire bill before
signing it into law. We are also very thankful to see Senators Stefano and
Mastriano introduce legislation to repeal Act 77 and encourage all of you to vote
in favor of it.
However, the Supreme Court’s decision violated the Pennsylvania Constitution
which clearly outlines that any changes made to the law must go through the
legislature. By removing the safeguards that Act 77 put in place, these changes
opened the door for potential fraud and as a result, most citizens in Pennsylvania
who voted for Donald Trump have lost all confidence in our voting system, so
much so that they have no desire to vote again.
3
In addition, on November 19th, the Pennsylvania House voted to approve a
Republican-sponsored measure to set up a near-immediate audit of the 2020
election, citing inconsistencies and confusion in the electorate as evidence that
the process must be improved for future elections in the state. The vote was 112
in favor of the audit and 90 against it. However, the Legislative Budget and
Finance Committee ultimately rejected the request for an audit. They were
expected to release a report to include the following information on both the
county level and statewide level:
• For both absentee and mail-in ballots, the number of applications
received, the number that were approved by the county board of
elections, and the number returned by voters that were subsequently
canvassed.
• The number of qualified voters who used provisional ballots.
• The number of applications for absentee ballots from people who were
not registered to vote, but subsequently did submit a voter registration
application in time for the election — and the same information
concerning mail-in ballots.
• For each county, the date and time that the county board of elections
began pre-canvassing absentee ballots and mail-in ballots.
• Reviews of incidents with voting machines; of “any inconsistent
treatment” of mail-in ballots received after 8 p.m. on Election Day; of any
inconsistencies in the way counties processed “deficient” ballots; and of
access given to poll watchers and authorized representatives.
I haven’t been able to locate any such report, so I’m assuming it was never done.
According to the votes.pa.com website, the purpose for a post-election audit is
to detect errors, to deter fraudulent activity, to ensure votes were counted
correctly, and to build voters’ trust in our elections. I have established below a list
of irregularities that indicate enough cause for concern to perform a full
investigative audit of the Pennsylvania 2020 General Election. These irregularities
have been broken down into several categories, and all the sources are listed on
the Reference page at the end of this document.
• Overall Number inconsistencies
• A total of 423,116 votes were removed from President Trump on election
day. This has been well documented by multiple outlets.
• In Philadelphia County there are 1686 precincts. In 278 of those precincts,
97% or more votes were for Joe Biden. This is an unprecedented outlier.
• According to a statement released on December 28th by Rep. Mike Jones,
there were 170,000 more ballots cast than there were voters who
actually voted. To our knowledge, none of these irregularities were
investigated or resolved due to the fact that this data surfaced after
Secretary Boockvar and Governor Wolf certified the election results.
4
• Over 21,000 dead people were on voter rolls prior to the November
3rd election, 12,192 of whom were listed as Active Voters. According to
an article in the Washington Times, this issue was taken to court, but no
investigation was done to confirm that dead voters were not attached to
recorded mail in ballots.
• You will find on the reference page a link that includes a list of dead voters
along with their referenced obituaries who had a recorded vote on the
PA track my ballot website before it was taken down on November 21st,
2020.
• Voting Machine Issues
• It is confirmed that Pennsylvania did purchase all new electronic
voting machines from a variety of companies ahead of the
November 2020 election. 14 counties have Dominion voting
machines, which came under intense scrutiny regarding issues of
potential voter fraud.
• Dominion claims that their machines are not able to connect to
the internet and therefore cannot be hacked into for the purpose
of switching votes from one candidate to another. However, we
witnessed on live TV in the Senate Georgia hearing on January
5th, 2021 the voting machines were in fact connected to WiFi and
an individual was able to hack into the machines through his
phone giving him direct access to the votes in real-time, thus
proving Dominion claims are false.
• It has been well documented on major media networks that there were
instances in which the Pennsylvania vote totals changed from Donald
Trump to Joe Biden in very large batches. For reference, here is one of
the larger changes made in real-time on election night.
• 11/3, on CNN at 11:09 pm – 11:10 pm
Trump 1,690,589 Biden 1,252,537
Trump 1,670,631 Biden 1,272,495
This shows a direct switch of 19,958 votes going from Trump to Biden.
• It is now well outlined in the documentary Absolute Proof by Mike Lindell
that the voting machines in Pennsylvania were in fact tampered with by
foreign adversaries, namely China. If you have not yet seen the
documentary, I highly recommend viewing it. He references Mary
Fanning, an investigative reporter, who has documented evidence
including IP addresses of the computers responsible for hacking into our
voting system and switching votes in numerous states, including
Pennsylvania.
• Mail in Ballot Issues
• According to an article written by the Epoch Times on November
10th, more than 20,000 mail in ballots have impossible return
dates and 80,000 have return dates that raise questions.
• 51,000 mail in ballots were recorded as received just one day
after they were sent out.
• 35,000 mail in ballots were returned on the same day they were
sent out.
5
• 23,000 mail in ballots have a return date that is earlier than the
sent date – a total impossibility.
• More than 9,000 mail in ballots have no sent date listed at all. Act
77 allowed Pennsylvanians to “request, receive, mark and cast
your mail-in or absentee ballot all in one visit to your county
election office or other designated location.” That may explain
the ballots with no sent date—they may have been received and
cast in person. However, this has not been investigated at all.
• 43,000 mail in ballots were returned two days after being sent
out, which is remarkably fast, but still possible. However, this also
has not been investigated.
• Conclusion – Impossible and improbable return dates indicate
that there is something wrong with either the database or the
ballots.
• Unconstitutional Changes to Act 77
• In September of 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that ballots
could be accepted until 5 p.m. Friday November 6th, as long as they were
postmarked by Election Day. The justices also said those ballots could be
accepted even if they did not have a postmark or had one that was
illegible, as long as there was not a “preponderance of evidence” to show
they were sent too late. This is a direct violation of the PA Constitution
that makes it clear that any changes to election laws must go through the
legislative branch.
• On October 23, 2020, upon a petition from the Secretary of the
Commonwealth, the state Supreme Court ruled that mail-in ballots need
not authenticate signatures for said ballots, thereby treating in-person
and mail-in voters dissimilarly and eliminating a critical safeguard to
ensure the integrity of the vote.
• The Department of State under Kathy Boockvar changed the rules on the
Monday prior to election day, by providing last-second guidance directing
counties to provide information to help voters whose mail-in or absentee
ballots were incorrectly completed so those voters could vote on a
provisional ballot. Due to this being done last minute, counties differed
on if and how they notified voters or the parties when this happened.
This violates the equal protection clause of the US Constitution giving an
unfair advantage to mail in ballot voter versus in person voters.
Noting the above, we believe there is more than enough evidence for WE THE
PEOPLE to request a full investigative audit of the 2020 election. We have grave
concerns that our elected officials are not representing the people who put them
in office due to the following:
1. Governor Wolf has made it clear that he has no interest in investigating
the nature of these large numbers of errors and just wants everyone to
move on.
2. Kathy Boockvar Tweeted on March 7, 2017 that “Using the title
‘President’ before the word ‘Trump’ really demeans the office of the
presidency.”
6
3. Josh Shapiro is on video tape saying that Trump supporters who want
answers to these questions are insane and have something mentally
wrong with them.
Because of their own comments, we do not believe any of these elected officials
are going to be willing to give the Pennsylvania citizens the peace of mind that
we are seeking by fully investigating the 2020 election. We are hereby requesting
an investigative audit of the 2020 election to include the following:
1. Recounts for all in person votes cast on election day including provisional
ballots. We request that these be cross referenced with the mail in ballots
to make sure each person only voted once.
2. Recounts and audits including signature verification in accordance with
Act 77 on all mail in ballots with an initial focus on Philadelphia and
Allegheny counties.
3. Full forensic investigation on all electronic voting machines conducted by
an independent audit company.
4. In order to allow time for a full forensic audit, we are requesting to push
back the upcoming May primary elections for at least 90 days.
We are willing to help in this effort by donating our time free of charge to fully
investigate and get to the bottom of these irregularities in our voting system to
ensure the integrity of the vote moving forward. The initial batch of legislative
meetings that were held in the month of February and March were completely
insufficient and did not cover any of our concerns or address any of the
irregularities that have been pointed out in this letter. It looked more like
corporate paper pushing than an honest attempt at election integrity. This is not
going away no matter how many times you tell us to just move on. Election
records are saved for 22 months for this exact reason, and this should be a
bipartisan issue. Sweeping this all under the rug by attempting to reform Act 77
is simply not an option.
This is the first letter we are sending. We request a response within 3 business
days of receipt of this letter. A hard copy is on its way in the mail. If we do not get
a response, we will move forward with our next course of action, which may
include getting lawyers involved and/or launching a campaign to primary each
and every one of you who will not agree to an audit.
Attached you will find signatures of over 10,000 Pennsylvania residents who are
behind this effort and that number is growing by 200 to 500 signatures daily. We
appreciate you being willing to do the job we elected you for and look forward to
hearing from you regarding your plans to proceed with the full investigative audit
of the 2020 General Election.
Regards,
Toni L. Shuppe
7
References:
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/16/3-fishy-things-in-pennsylvania-voter-
data-the-state-has-yet-to-explain/
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2020/december/senate-hearing-
examines-voting-irregularities-ken-starr-nbsp-points-to-clear-violation-of-the-
law-in-pa
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/25/highlights-of-pennsylvania-
republicans-hearing-on-election-irregularities/
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/nov/6/pennsylvania-lawsuit-
claims-21000-deceased-people-/
https://theamericanreport.org/
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/divided-pennsylvania-house-gives-
approval-for-audit-of-2020-election/ar-BB1bbgP7
https://www.votespa.com/About-Elections/Pages/Post-Election-Audits.aspx
https://hereistheevidence.com
www.michaeljlindell.com
https://revealthesteal.blogspot.com
The prior memo [“V”] discussed many of the issues raised in this petition, some of which seem
not to be as unnerving as the ten major concepts detailed by Navarro; for example, it seems the
local voting machines weren’t connected to the Internet, noting the delivery of cassettes to the
county for upload to Harrisburg (although perhaps the county machines should be audited).
Emphasized is the ability of the reader to “trace backward” each of the referenced assertions in
these half-dozen memos; despite the fact that the Committee’s Chair opened each session with
the admonition that the goal was prospective (2022) rather than retroactive (2020), damning info
was revealed. That his patina of politeness was shattered by Davidson/Kenyatta illustrates why
it’s a fool’s errand to hope that any degree of bipartisanship will emerge from this process.
Efforts were initiated yesterday to circulate these analyses as broadly as possible, ASAP, because
the Arizona experience illustrates the fact that organizing a Forensic Audit is initially daunting;
also, having repelled numerous lawsuits from Arizona officials and Democrats has yielded focus
on security and transparency which would best be emulated with precision and inclusiveness.
In my view, the “next step” isn’t to invoke the judiciary, for it’s preferable to apply what Bannon
terms the “receipts” to the Legislature, so that it can then confirm their accuracy via an Audit;
soon, it is hoped, an op-ed will emerge which details the potential legal pathway that exists.
It has been postulated that the Supreme Court refused to take up Election Cases because they
lacked well-developed factual and legal records; the SCOTUS prefers that the implications of the
potential outcomes have been thoroughly explored in advance by both sides (as well as any other
parties with an interest in the outcome, such as the federal government). Thus, if three of the
battleground states withdraw certification of their Electors, Biden would no longer traverse the
270 total needed, yielding final adjudication by state-delegations in the Congress … yielding the
majority GOP choosing Trump; the details of this process have been submitted as an op-ed.
Readers are invited to critique EVERYTHING being disseminated, analysis and synthesis.
8
9
