Construction and Building Materials: Fernando C.R. Almeida, Almir Sales, Juliana P. Moretti, Paulo C.D. Mendes
Construction and Building Materials: Fernando C.R. Almeida, Almir Sales, Juliana P. Moretti, Paulo C.D. Mendes
h i g h l i g h t s g r a p h i c a l a b s t r a c t
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history:                                          SBAS (sugarcane bagasse ash sand) is the term used for the residue left over from burning sugarcane
Received 2 October 2014                                   bagasse. Large amounts of this agro-industrial by-product are generated in Brazilian sugar and ethanol
Received in revised form 19 January 2015                  plants, and its disposal is an environmental problem. The application of SBAS as a fine aggregate in mor-
Accepted 18 February 2015
                                                          tars can add value to this waste and also reduce the use of natural sand. The growing need to extract nat-
Available online xxxx
                                                          ural sand from Brazilian rivers has caused environmental problems. In this article, the effect of SBAS on
                                                          mortars was investigated, specifically its compressive strength, porosity, carbonation depth and chloride
Keywords:
                                                          penetration. The present study fills the gap in knowledge on the durability of mortars using different
Sugarcane bagasse ash sand
Mortars
                                                          levels of SBAS. The substitution of natural sand by SBAS, especially with content of 30%, can lead to main-
Porosity                                                  tenance of mechanical properties, micropore clogging and improvement of the durability of mortars, in
Accelerated carbonation                                   comparison with a reference mixture.
Chloride penetration                                                                                                        Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction                                                                                   SBAS has high silica (SiO2) content (above 60% by mass), with
                                                                                              variable and coarse particle size distribution [4]. The large amount
   Sugarcane production is a major agricultural activity in Brazil.                           of silica present in SBAS is due to the presence of sand from the
Sugarcane bagasse ash sand (SBAS) is one of the major                                         growing and harvesting processes [3].
by-products from the processing of sugarcane to produce sugar                                     SBAS is the crude residue generated after the burning of sugar-
and ethanol. In Brazil, 4 million tonnes of SBAS are generated per                            cane bagasse. This residue is collected from boilers at plants and
year [1,2]. SBAS is usually disposed of in crops, despite lacking ade-                        has low levels of pozzolanic reactivity. SBAS shows a predominant-
quate nutrients for its use as fertilizer [3].                                                ly crystalline quartz structure, which impairs its pozzolanic activ-
                                                                                              ity [5]. Pozzolanicity in SBAS can be achieved by controlling the
                                                                                              burning of bagasse (via burning temperature and burning/cooling
    ⇑ Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 16 33518659; fax: +55 16 33518262.                      time) and/or SBAS grinding conditions. After these treatments,
      E-mail address: almir@ufscar.br (A. Sales).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.039
0950-0618/Ó 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
32                                              F.C.R. Almeida et al. / Construction and Building Materials 82 (2015) 31–38
the by-product is called sugarcane bagasse ash (SBAS [4,6], SBA [7]                     natural sand and mixture (SBAS + natural sand) is shown in
or BA [8,9]).                                                                           Fig. 2. The composition of the mixture (SBAS + natural sand) was
    The reactivity of sugarcane bagasse ash is directly dependent on                    classified according to the usable area as a fine aggregate, consid-
the conditions when burning the bagasse. Maximum reactivity can                         ering levels of 30% and 50% by mass [17].
be achieved by burning bagasse at around 500 °C [6]. Sugarcane                             The SBAS used in this experimental programme had a pre-
bagasse is burned in plants at temperatures between 700 °C and                          dominantly crystalline structure of SiO2a-quartz, as determined
900 °C, depending on its moisture content [4]. Thus, pozzolanicity                      by X-ray diffractometry in other studies, which revealed the
in SBAS is not obtained by the uncontrolled burning of bagasse in                       absence of an amorphous halo in the diffractograms [14]. The val-
plants.                                                                                 ues obtained by chemical analysis (before and after stan-
    In addition, sugarcane bagasse ash can become reactive by                           dardisation) are presented in Table 2. Also, the chemical
ultrafine grinding. Product obtained by grinding to values of D80                        composition of the sugarcane bagasse ash (SBAS treated) studied
(80% passing size) below about 60 lm and Blaine specific surface                         by other authors are shown in Table 2. The SBAS showed low poz-
areas above 300 m2/kg can be classified as pozzolans [4,9,10].                           zolanic reactivity, according to the results of the modified Chapelle
Pozzolanicity can also be obtained from sugarcane bagasse ash                           test. In this test, 48 mg of CaO were consumed per gram of SBAS.
by combining controlled burning with grinding the ash [8,11].                           The minimum consumption of CaO for a mineral addition to be
However, grinding and/or controlled burning require energy, and                         considered pozzolanic is 330 mg of CaO.
treating large volumes of SBAS using these processes is costly.                            The binder used was a Portland-composite cement with
    The low pozzolanic reactivity of SBAS does not prevent its use in                   blast-furnace slag (CP II E 32). The chemical composition of the
construction materials [5,7,12–15]. An alternative would be to use                      cement is shown in Table 3.
it as a fine aggregate in mortars. The extraction of natural sand
causes environmental impacts, such as the removal of vegetation                         2.2. Production of mortars
cover, siltation of rivers and degradation of waterways [16]. The
use of SBAS as a fine aggregate can reduce the use of natural sand                          Three series of mortars with different SBAS contents were pro-
and decrease the volume of waste disposed of in the environment.                        duced, with 0% (reference mortar, RM), 30% (M30) and 50% (M50)
    The aim of this paper was to evaluate the use of SBAS (without                      substitutions of natural sand (by mass). The proportions of materi-
grinding and without controlled thermal treatment) as an alterna-                       als used in each series of mortar were the same proportions as
tive aggregate substitute for natural sand in the production of mor-                    determined by other studies [14], considering a mortar content
tar. To do so, the influence of SBAS on the mortar was investigated                      of 51.3%. The amount of water in each series was adjusted to main-
through measuring the compressive strength and analysing the                            tain the same levels of mortar consistency. The increase in SBAS
porosity, carbonation depth and chloride penetration.                                   content led to an increased water/cement ratio (w/c) in the mix-
                                                                                        ture. The proportion of materials used in each series of mortar is
2. Experimental methodology                                                             shown in Table 4.
                                                                                           The materials used to produce the mortar were mixed in a
2.1. Materials                                                                          mechanical mixer to obtain a homogeneous mass. Each mortar
                                                                                        was moulded in cylindrical dimensions of 50  100 mm (di-
   Sugarcane bagasse ash sand (SBAS) was used as a fine aggregate                        ameter  height). The samples were kept in a humid chamber for
in partial substitution for natural sand (at levels of 30% and 50%, by                  28 days (relative humidity of 95% ± 5%) [18].
mass) to produce mortar. SBAS samples were collected from sugar
and ethanol plants in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. These SBAS                        2.3. Physical and mechanical characteristics of the mortars
samples were standardised by sieving (mesh of 4.8 mm) and grind-
ing for three minutes at a mechanic mill (mortar/pestle) [14]. The                         The compressive strengths of the mortars were tested by apply-
appearance of the SBAS before and after the standardisation pro-                        ing a load at an average speed of 0.25 MPa/s, in accordance with
cess can be seen in Fig. 1.                                                             ABNT NBR 7215:1996 [18].
   The characterisation results of the SBAS and natural sand are                           The physical properties of the mortars were verified by testing
presented in Table 1. The particle size distribution of the SBAS,                       their water absorption, void ratio and dry bulk density [19]. The
                                                                                        mortar specimens were also characterised via optical microscopy
                                                                                        (OM) in order to analyse the mean pore diameter. OM was carried
                                                                                        out in a HIROX Digital Microscope KH-7700 equipped with a digital
                                                                                        image acquisition system and dark and bright field illumination
                                                                                        techniques. The OM technique was adequate for observing the
                                                                                        effect of varying the porosity of the mortars, as a function of aver-
                                                                                        age pore size and pore distribution.
                                                                                           The results of these tests were submitted to analysis of variance
                                                                                        (ANOVA) and Student’s t-test at a significance level of 5%.
                                                                                        Table 1
                                                                                        Characterisation results of the SBAS and natural sand.
Table 2
Chemical composition of the SBAS (by mass, %) used on the experimental program and compared with other studies.
  Elements             SBAS (before standardisation)     SBAS (after standardisation)      Faria et al. [3]    Cordeiro et al. [4]   Souza et al. [12]   Sales & Lima [14]
  SiO2                 80.2                              80.8                              61.6                78.3                  85.5                88.2
  Fe2O3                 5.6                               5.8                               7.4                  3.6                  1.3                  5.1
  K2O                   4.0                               3.9                               6.2                  3.5                  3.5                  1.3
  Al2O3                 2.6                               2.5                               5.9                  8.6                  5.3                  2.3
  CaO                   1.8                               1.6                               5.0                  2.2                  2.1                  0.6
  MgO                   1.6                               1.5                               1.2                  1.7                  1.1                  0.4
  P2O5                  1.4                               1.4                               1.0                  1.1                   0.5                 0.4
  TiO2                  1.4                               1.3                               1.5                –                       0.3                 1.0
  Na2O                  0.2                               0.2                              –                     0.1                 –                     0.1
  MnO                   0.2                               0.1                              –                     0.1                 –                   –
  SO3                   0.1                               0.1                                0.4               –                     –                   <0.1
  Loss on ignition      0.80                              0.70                              9.8                  0.42                –                     0.35
34                                                   F.C.R. Almeida et al. / Construction and Building Materials 82 (2015) 31–38
Table 3                                                                                          The explanation for the increased average pore diameter value
Chemical and physical properties of the Portland cement CP II E 32 (source:                  of mortars with SBAS is in the analysis of Fig. 5. The following dis-
manufacturer).
                                                                                             cussion is based on the analysis of the regions highlighted in yel-
     Properties                           Unit    Cement Elements (%)          Cement        low (light colour) and violet (dark colour).
     Specific gravity                      g/cm3    3.02 MP 1000 °C            4.09               Firstly, the frequency and variation of the mortars’ pore dia-
     Granulated slag content              %        34.0 SiO2                  24.10          meters in the area highlighted in yellow in Fig. 5 will be discussed.
     Initial setting time                 min      197  Al2O3                 7.42           The frequency of pores with diameters below 150 lm was higher
     Final setting time                   min      279  Fe2O3                 3.08
                                                        CaO                  52.10
                                                                                             in the reference mortar (without SBAS) because there were fewer
                        Retained #200 %            3.60 MgO                   3.38           small pores in the mortar samples with SBAS. The SBAS provided
     Fineness           Blaine specific cm2/g       4141 SO3                   2.17           a physical effect of filling smaller pores due to its smaller particle
                        surface                                                              size, compared to natural sand. The high content of powder mate-
                                                           Na2O                0.28
                                                                                             rial in the SBAS (16.2% by mass, Table 1) favours the filling of
                        3 days            MPa      18.5    K2O                 1.05
     Compressive        7 days            MPa      26.8    Carbonic            1.52          small-diameter pores in mortars. The content of powder material
       strength (fcj)                                      anhydride – CO2                   was greater than the maximum acceptable amount of 5% for con-
                        28 days           MPa      39.5    Insoluble residue   2.47          ventional fine aggregates [17]. The filling of smaller-diameter
                                                                                             pores may cause an increase in the average pore diameter of a mor-
                                                                                             tar, as shown in Fig. 6 and algebraically in Expressions 1–7. Thus,
with the increased w/c ratio. This fact can be explained by the filler                        the lack of small-diameter pore values in the average calculation
effect of SBAS. Fine SBAS particles have the physical effect of filling                       of mortars with SBAS may favour the increase of the final average
mortar micropores, allowing the maintenance of mechanical                                    pore diameter value. This behaviour was similar between the sam-
strength with the increasing w/c ratio.                                                      ples with 30% and 50% SBAS.
    The results of the dry bulk density, absorption and void ratio
tests on the mortars (RM, M30 and M50) at 28 days are shown in                                1 ¼ n:D þ m:d
                                                                                             X                                                                                 ð1Þ
Table 5.                                                                                             nþm
    The water absorption and void ratio values showed significant
differences between the samples with and without SBAS. The val-                               2 ¼ n:D
                                                                                             X                                                                                 ð2Þ
ues of the M30 and M50 samples were statistically different from                                    n
the RM values. Thus, the use of SBAS may cause an increase in                                                  2
                                                                                                          1 < X
                                                                                             Hypothesis : X                                                                    ð3Þ
the water absorption and void ratio of the mortars. This increase
may be caused by the increased absorption of SBAS, compared to
                                                                                             n:D þ m:d n:D
natural sand. Furthermore, the difference in the porosity of mortars                                  <                                                                        ð4Þ
due to the increased w/c ratio required for casting may have                                   nþm      n
increased the water absorption (around 7%, when comparing
                                                                                             n:D þ m:d < n:D þ m:D                                                             ð5Þ
M50 and RM) and void ratio (around 6%, when comparing M50
and RM). Dry bulk density was also influenced by this effect of
                                                                                             m:d < m:D                                                                         ð6Þ
increased porosity because of the increased w/c ratio. The differ-
ence in the dry bulk density values (around 2%) was considered
                                                                                             d < D ðQ :E:D:Þ                                                                   ð7Þ
significant, just when comparing the values of the reference mortar
(RM) and M50 sample (50% substitution by SBAS). However, the                                    where:
increases of these porosity indicators can be controlled by reducing                             1 = mean pore diameter value of mortar without SBAS.
                                                                                                X
the w/c ratio in each of the three mixtures [11].                                                2 = mean pore diameter value of mortar with SBAS.
                                                                                                X
    The mean pore diameter values of the mortars were obtained                                  D = diameter of larger pores.
using optical microscopy (OM), Table 6. The variance values indi-                               d = diameter of smaller pores (which can be filled by SBAS).
cate high statistical dispersion of the measures, which indicates                               n = number of pores with diameter equal to ‘‘D’’.
the variety of pore size diameters in the different mortar samples.                             m = number of pores with diameter equal to ‘‘d’’.
This variation in the pore diameter measurements of the three                                   Secondly, the frequency and variation of the pore diameter in
mortar samples can be seen in Fig. 4.                                                        mortars in the area highlighted in violet in Fig. 5 will be discussed.
    The porosity variation was significant when comparing the                                 Many pores with diameters greater than 360 lm were observed in
average values of MR and M50 samples using statistical tests                                 the mortar with 50% SBAS. This increase in the porosity of the M50
applied at a significance level a of 5% (ANOVA and Student’s t).
Thus, the average pore diameter of the reference mortar was statis-
tically equivalent to the average pore diameter of the mortar with
30% SBAS.                                                                                                                           50.00   45.94       46.27          45.63
                                                                                                       Compressive strength (MPa)
     Group SBAS content (%) Mix proportion (by mass)              Consistency (mm)                                                   0.00
                                                                                                                                             RM          M30            M50
                                  Cement Sand     SBAS    Water
                                                                                                                                                    Group of mortars
     RM       0                   1.000     2.010 –     0.420     250 ± 10
     M30     30                   1.000     1.407 0.603 0.440     251 ± 10
                                                                                             Fig. 3. Compressive strength test results of the mortar samples at the age of
     M50     50                   1.000     1.005 1.005 0.470     258 ± 10
                                                                                             28 days.
                                                  F.C.R. Almeida et al. / Construction and Building Materials 82 (2015) 31–38                                                                                35
Table 5
Physical properties of the mortar samples at the age of 28 days.
     Group       Absorption (%)                                    Void ratio (%)                                               Dry bulk density (g/cm3)
                                          1             2                                    1               2
                 Average value (%)     SD (%)       CV (%)         Average value (%)      SD (%)         CV (%)                 Average value (g/cm3)                        SD1 (g/cm3)           CV2 (%)
     RM          10.17                 0.20         2              20.64                  0.30           1                      2.03                                         0.01                  1
     M30         10.72                 0.19         2              21.56                  0.30           1                      2.01                                         0.01                  1
     M50         10.92                 0.32         3              21.79                  0.52           2                      2.00                                         0.01                  1
 1
      SD – Standard deviation.
 2
      CV – Coefficient of variation.
Table 6
Average pore diameter values of the mortars by optical microscopy.
                                                                                                                                                                                    L23
     Group Average value    Standard deviation Variance      Number of                                                                                                                             L21
                                                                                                                                                                                             L22
           (lm)             (lm)               (lm2)         observations                                L26          L25
                                                                                                                                           L11                           L24
of larger diameters.
    The incorporation of SBAS influenced the filling of smaller pores                                                                                                                  L8
in the mortar matrix due to their smaller particle size, compared to
natural sand. The higher the SBAS fineness, the better the packing                                                                                L3
                                                                                                                                                            L4
effect of the particles, which can lead to higher compression                                      M50                                                                               500µm
strength values, since the w/c ratios are kept constant [6].
Fig. 5. Normal distribution of pore diameter measures for the mortars obtained by optical microscopy.
Fig. 6. Schematic representation of the calculation to determine the average pore diameter of the mortars without SBAS and with 30% SBAS.
Fig. 8. Average carbonation depth values at different ages for the mortar samples.
Fig. 7. The M50 specimen after colorimetric treatment at 365 days for carbonation
depth analysis.
                                                                                            The carbonation depth magnitudes among the studied mixtures
                                                                                        were similar at early conditioning ages. However, the M50 sample
3.2. Analysis of carbonation depth in mortars                                           at the age of 365 days had significantly greater carbonation depth
                                                                                        than the RM and M30 samples. Carbonation depth can be
   Fig. 7 shows the colorimetric treatment applied to the mortar                        decreased by reducing the w/c ratio and by the packing effect of
specimens. The average carbonation depth values (in mm) in accel-                       the cementitious matrix provided by the SBAS fineness. The incor-
erated testing are shown in Fig. 8.                                                     poration of finer material and the reduction in the w/c lead to a
                                               F.C.R. Almeida et al. / Construction and Building Materials 82 (2015) 31–38                                       37
Fig. 9. Comparison of the mean pore diameter and carbonation depth (CD) at the
age of 365 days of the mortar samples.                                                 Fig. 11. Average chloride penetration values at different ages for the mortar
                                                                                       samples.
  The incorporation of SBAS can reduce the amount of mortar                              [7] Lima AS, Varum H, Sales A, Neto VF. Analysis of the mechanical properties of
                                                                                              compressed earth block masonry using the sugarcane bagasse ash. Constr
   pores with smaller diameters (below 150 lm) due to the small-
                                                                                              Build Mater 2012;35:829–37.
   er particle size of SBAS. This indicates a possible packing effect                     [8] Ganesan K, Rajagopal K, Thangavel K. Evaluation of bagasse ash as
   of SBAS on the mortar. Furthermore, 30% content is favourable                              supplementary       cementitious     material.    Cement      Concrete    Comp
   to the mixture because it leads the mortar to have an amount                               2007;29(6):515–24.
                                                                                          [9] Rukzon S, Chindaprasirt P. Utilization of bagasse ash in high-strength concrete.
   of pores with larger diameters (greater than 360 lm) equivalent                            Mater Design 2012;34:45–50.
   to the reference sample;                                                              [10] Somna R, Jaturapitakkul C, Rattanachu P, Chalee W. Effect of ground bagasse
  The carbonation depths are statistically equivalent for the mor-                           ash on mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete.
                                                                                              Mater Design 2012;36:597–603.
   tars containing 0% and 30% SBAS, even after 365 days of condi-                        [11] Paula MO, Tinoco IFF, Rodrigues CS, Saraz JAO. Sugarcane bagasse ash as a
   tioning. Substitution contents greater than 30% can lead to                                partial Portland cement replacement material. Dyna 2010; 77 (163): 47–54.
   increased carbonation front;                                                               Available:       <http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=
                                                                                              S0012-73532010000300005&lng=en&tlng=en>.
  The incorporation of SBAS, both in levels of 30% and 50%, can                         [12] Souza AE, Teixeira SR, Santos GTA, Costa FB, Longo E. Reuse of sugarcane
   significantly increase the chloride penetration resistance of                               bagasse ash (SCBA) to produce ceramic materials. J Environ Manage
   mortars.                                                                                   2011;92(10):2774–80.
                                                                                         [13] Teixeira SR, Magalhães RS, Arenales A, Souza AE, Romero M, Rincón JM.
                                                                                              Valorization of sugarcane bagasse ash: Producing glass-ceramic materials. J
   The substitution of natural sand by SBAS, especially at a content                          Environ Manage 2014;134:15–9.
of 30%, can lead to the maintenance of mechanical properties,                            [14] Sales A, Lima SA. Use of Brazilian sugarcane bagasse ash in concrete as sand
                                                                                              replacement. Waste Manage 2010;30(6):1114–22.
micropore clogging and improvement of durability of the mortar,
                                                                                         [15] Modani PO, Vyawahare MR. Utilization of bagasse ash as a partial replacement
in comparison with a reference mixture (without SBAS).                                        of fine aggregate in concrete. Procedia Eng 2013;51:25–9.
                                                                                         [16] Sales A, Souza FR. Concretes and mortars recycled with water treatment sludge
Acknowledgements                                                                              and    construction     and    demolition    rubble.    Constr    Build   Mater
                                                                                              2009;23(6):2362–70.
                                                                                         [17] ABNT – NBR 7211. Agregados para concretos – Especificação (Aggregates for
    The authors acknowledge CAPES and MCTI/CNPq for the finan-                                 concrete – Specification). Rio de Janeiro; 2009 [in Portuguese].
cial support; Cosan for supplying the SBAS; Grupo de Materiais                           [18] ABNT – NBR 7215. Cimento Portland – Determinação da resistência à
                                                                                              compressão (Portland cement – Determination of compressive strength). Rio
Eletroquímicos e Métodos Eletroanalíticos – IQSC/USP for support-                             de Janeiro; 1996 [in Portuguese].
ing the optical microscopy analysis; and Laboratório                                     [19] ABNT – NBR 9778. Argamassa e concreto endurecido – Determinação da
Interdisciplinar de Eletroquímica & Cerâmica/UFSCar.                                          absorção de água por imersão, índice de vazios e massa específica (Hardened
                                                                                              cement mortar and concrete – Determination of water absorption by
                                                                                              immersion, borehole index and bulk density – Method of test). Rio de
References                                                                                    Janeiro; 1987 [in Portuguese].
                                                                                         [20] Sanjuan MA, Olmo C. Carbonation resistance of one industrial mortar used as a
[1] Conab – National Company of Supply. Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de                 concrete coating. Build Environ 2001;36(8):949–53.
    cana-de-açúcar – Primeiro levantamento da safra 2014/15 (Monitoring of the           [21] Pauletti C, Possan E, Dal Molin DCC. Accelerated carbonation: state-of-the art
    Brazilian sugarcane crop – First survey of the 2014/15 crop). Brasília: Conab;            of the research in Brazil. Ambiente Construído 2007; 7(4): 7–20. Available:
    April 2014. Available: <http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/                <http://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/ambienteconstruido/article/view/3750/2103>
    14_04_15_15_44_37_boletim_cana_portugues_-_1o_lev_-_14.pdf>                 [in           [in Portuguese].
    Portuguese].                                                                         [22] RILEM Concrete Permanent Comitee. RILEM draft recommendation –
[2] FIESP/CIESP. Ampliação da oferta de energia através da biomassa (Expanding                Measurement of hardened concrete carbonation depth CPC-18. Mater Struct
    energy supply from biomass). São Paulo: FIESP/CIESP; 2001. Available: <http://            1984;17(102):435–40.
    www.fiesp.com.br/arquivo-download/?id=4505> [in Portuguese].                          [23] AASHTO – T259. Standard method of test for resistance of concrete to chloride
[3] Faria KCP, Gurgel RF, Holanda JNF. Recycling of sugarcane bagasse ash waste in            ion penetration. Washington; 1980.
    the production of clay bricks. J Environ Manage 2012;101:7–12.                       [24] Rukzon S, Chindaprasirt P. Strength and carbonation model of rice husk ash
[4] Cordeiro GC, Toledo Filho RD, Tavares LM, Fairbaim EMR. Ultrafine grinding of              cement mortar with different fineness. J Mater Civil Eng 2010;22(3):253–9.
    sugar cane bagasse ash for application as pozzolanic admixture in concrete.          [25] Figueiredo CP, Santos FB, Cascudo O, Carasek H, Cachim P, Velosa A. The role of
    Cement Concrete Res 2009;39(2):110–55.                                                    metakaolin in the protection of concrete against the deleterious action of
[5] Teixeira SR, Souza AE, Santos GTA, Peña AFV, Miguel AG. Sugarcane bagasse                 chlorides. Rev IBRACON Estrut Mater 2014; 7(4): 685–708. Available: <http://
    ash as a potential quartz replacement in red ceramic. J Am Ceram Soc                      dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952014000400008>.
    2008;91(6):1883–7.                                                                   [26] Chindaprasirt P, Rukzon S, Sirivivatnanon V. Resistance to chloride penetration
[6] Cordeiro GC, Toledo Filho RD, Tavares LM, Fairbaim EMR. Pozzolanic activity               of blended Portland cement mortar containing palm oil fuel ash, rice husk and
    and filler effect of sugar cane bagasse ash in Portland cement and lime mortars.           fly ash. Constr Build Mater 2008;22(5):932–8.
    Cement Concrete Comp 2008;30(5):410–8.