Case 6:21-cv-00059-NKM-RSB Document 30 Filed 04/14/22 Page 1 of 5 Pageid#: 230
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                      FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
                               LYNCHBURG DIVISION
 JANE DOE,
                          Plaintiff
 v.
                                                 CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-59
 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, INC.,
 and
 CHARLES TIPPETT
                   Defendants
                        COUNTERCLAIM OF CHARLES TIPPETT
        Defendant Charles Tippett (“Tippett”), by counsel, states the following as his
 Counterclaim against plaintiff Jane Doe (“Doe”):
                                  NATURE OF THE CASE
        This is an action for defamation brought pursuant to Virginia substantive law in
 order to redress Doe’s tortious conduct.
                                         PARTIES
        1.     Tippett is a defendant in the Complaint (CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:21-CV-59)
 filed in this Court by Doe.
        2.     Doe is the plaintiff in the aforesaid Complaint. Although she is proceeding
 in the Complaint under the pseudonym “Jane Doe”, her true identity is known to all
 parties. Tippett has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint against him for Doe’s
 violation of Rule 10(a) for her failure to proceed under her real name.
                                      JURISDICTION
        3.     This Counterclaim states a claim that arises out of the transaction or
 occurrence described in the Complaint. This Court consequently has jurisdiction of the
 Counterclaim pursuant to Rule 13(a).
                                             1
Case 6:21-cv-00059-NKM-RSB Document 30 Filed 04/14/22 Page 2 of 5 Pageid#: 231
                                         THE CLAIM
        4.       On April 16, 2021, Doe filed a complaint with Liberty University (“LU”)
 alleging that Tippett had raped her in an off-campus apartment on the “night before
 Halloween”, 2020, which would have been the night of October 30-31, 2020.
        5.       On April 17, 2021, Doe gave a lengthy interview to an LU official providing
 further details of her rape allegation against Tippett.
        6.       In the interview, Doe admitted, among other things:
    •   She had lied in a previous statement to LU about the allegations and wanted to
        retract that statement;
    •   Tippett was one of her best friends;
    •   On the night in question, she was “feeling lonely” so she called Tippett and he
        invited her to come over to his nearby apartment and “have a few drinks”. She
        agreed, “grabbed my toothbrush” and went to his apartment with the expectation
        of drinking alcohol and either taking an Uber home or spending the night at his
        apartment.
    •   At his apartment, they began drinking alcoholic beverages and she voluntarily
        drank three of those beverages.
    •   After awhile, they began kissing, and Tippett said at one point, “Wow, you’re so
        drunk.” She recalled laughing at his comment.
    •   She recalled going into his bedroom and saying, “Oh, I’m in your room. It’s so
        cool.”
    •   She recalls them having sexual intercourse.
    •   She feels that because she had been drinking, “I don’t think I was able to
                                               2
Case 6:21-cv-00059-NKM-RSB Document 30 Filed 04/14/22 Page 3 of 5 Pageid#: 232
        consent. That’s why I believe it’s rape.”
    •   She also said that while they were having sex, “I blame myself for it because I
        should’ve said stop . . . .” She said further, “I don’t know if I ever consented.”
        7.     Subsequent to her complaint and statement to LU on April 16 and 17,
 2021, Doe reaffirmed her rape allegation to other persons, including LU officials, on
 multiple occasions.
        8.     Tippett graduated from LU in May, 2021.             He then began full-time
 employment with a company for whom he had done part-time work while an LU student.
        9.     The rape allegation was republished on or about November 26, 2021
 when the HR Manager of Tippett’s employer read news accounts of the allegation after
 Doe filed her Complaint.
        10.    As a direct consequence of Doe’s rape allegation, Tippett’s employer
 immediately terminated his employment. It was his first full-time job after graduation
 from LU, and ended his hopes for a long career with the company for which he had
 worked while in college, in a field which was his career choice.
        11.    Doe’s allegation of rape is absolutely false and defamatory.          She and
 Tippett engaged in consensual sexual intercourse on the night in question.
        12.    Doe’s false accusation against Tippett of rape has caused Tippett and his
 family to suffer extraordinary mental anguish.
        13.    After being fired from his first full-time job, Tippett began applying for other
 jobs, but the fact that he has been falsely accused of rape has impeded his efforts to
 find another job in the fields in which he would like to work.
        14.    Tippett has lost income as a result of the termination of his employment,
                                               3
Case 6:21-cv-00059-NKM-RSB Document 30 Filed 04/14/22 Page 4 of 5 Pageid#: 233
 which was a direct consequence of Doe’s false rape allegation.
       15.     Doe’s false rape allegation has harmed Tippett’s reputation in the
 community and injured his good name. The allegation causes Tippett to have his name
 forever associated in the public mind with an accusation that carries a significant social
 stigma.
       16.     The false allegation of rape has prejudiced Tippett in his chosen
 profession.
       17.     Doe willfully, intentionally and maliciously accused Tippett of rape with the
 intent of causing damage to his reputation and other damages.
                                  DEMAND FOR RELIEF
       WHEREFORE, Tippett demands judgment against Doe as follows:
       (a)     compensatory damages of $1,000,000.00;
       (b)     punitive damages of $350,000.00;
       (c)     interest on the damages award from April 16, 2021; and
       (d)     Tippett’s costs in this behalf expended.
                                     JURY DEMAND
       Tippett demands trial by jury.
                                                 CHARLES TIPPETT
                                                 __/s/ John E. Falcone____________
                                                           Counsel
 John E. Falcone (Va. Bar #17879)
 jfalcone@pldrlaw.com
 Luke J. Malloy, III (VSB # 94877)
 lmalloy@pldrlaw.com
 PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS
 P.O. Box 1080
 Lynchburg, VA 24505
 Phone: 434-846-2768
 Fax: 434-847-0141 counsel for Charles Tippett
                                             4
Case 6:21-cv-00059-NKM-RSB Document 30 Filed 04/14/22 Page 5 of 5 Pageid#: 234
                                       CERTIFICATE
        I hereby certify that on this 14th day of April, 2022 I electronically filed the
 foregoing Counterclaim with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will
 serve all other counsel via e-mail.
                                                __/s/ John E. Falcone____________
                                                Counsel for Charles Tippett
 John E. Falcone (Va. Bar #17879)
 PETTY, LIVINGSTON, DAWSON & RICHARDS
 P.O. Box 1080
 Lynchburg, VA 24505
 Phone: 434-846-2768
 Fax: 434-847-0141
 jfalcone@pldrlaw.com