1
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Problem and Its Setting
The issue on child labor continues to exist not only in
the Philippines but in other regions of the world. It is
prohibited, yet, a lot are doing it. Child labor robs
children of their childhood, their potential, and their
dignity, as well as being detrimental to their physical and
mental development.
In the Philippines, child labor and its worst forms
refer to all sorts of slavery and similar activities,
including employment that is hazardous or likely to be
harmful to children's health, safety, or morality by its
very nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out.
The child who is forced to beg on the streets and make
money; a child prostitute who contributes to the tourist
industry's growth. In mines and quarries, the freed body is
digging out earth. The girl is employed as a servant in a
private residence. Scavenging in dumpsites by a child. The
runner is assisting in the distribution of illegal drugs. A
teenage displaying more skin in the social media is
necessary. Child labor has a lot of different faces. It is
work that puts children's health or safety at jeopardy,
2
interferes with or inhibits their education, or keeps them
away from play and other crucial activities.
Furthermore, the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child views child labor as a human right
violation. Child labor is considered to be damaging, and to
violate children's rights as it hampers children’s
appropriate emotional, physiological, psychological and
social development. The CRC aims to free children from
“economic exploitation and from performing any work that is
likely to be hazardous or to interfere with the child’s
education or to be harmful to the child’s health or
physical, mental, spiritual, moral or social development”
(Article 32, CRC).
Moreover, the 1987 Philippine Constitution ensures the
rights of children to assistance and protection from
neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation and other conditions
prejudicial to their development (Art. XV, Sec. 3, Item 2).
If this is so, why are there still children engaged in hard
labor?
Article 139, Chapter II, Title III, Book III of the
Labor Code establishes the minimum employable age and
prohibits the employment of anybody under the age of
eighteen (18) in any endeavor recognized by the Department
of Labor and Employment to be hazardous or injurious in
3
character. Article 140 makes it illegal to discriminate
against anyone based on their age when it comes to work
terms and circumstances. Subject to the Secretary of Labor's
approval, a child of at least 14 years of age may be
employed in apprenticeable occupations in highly technical
industries under Book II of the Labor Code (As amended by
Section 1, Executive Order No. 111, December 24, 1986.)
Likewise, Book III, Chapter III of the same code allows
children under 18 years of age to be employed as household
helpers, provided that their employer gives them the
opportunity for at least an elementary education, the cost
of which shall be part of the helper’s compensation, unless
otherwise stipulated.
According to recent ILO (International Labor
Organization) survey statistics, 95% of Philippine children
aged 10 to 14 are in school, and 13% of children in the same
age group are involved in economic activities. Around 85%
are in school only, 11% mix school and work, 3% are idle
(not in school or job), and 2% are in work just. Boys are
slightly less likely to be in school and are more likely to
work (15 percent against 10%). In the Philippines, children
in this age range are not permitted to engage in commercial
activities, despite the fact that implementation of such
4
regulations has been under-resourced, at least until the
establishment in 2015 of an interagency coordination group.1
The ILO calls government authorities' attention to
abolish various forms of child labor in their area. However,
the government is attempting, but failing, to curb child
labor because they do not want to insult parents with
working children, thus, many local officials disregard child
labor issues.
Child labor is also present in Catarman, Northern
Samar, particularly in Barangay Bangkerohan. Due to poverty,
some families, according to barangay officials, allow their
children to work at a young age. This is to assist the
parents in meeting the daily demands of their family. With
such a scenario of children, the barangay local government
unit (BLGU) took no action since they lacked the capacity to
help and assist these families in their daily subsistence,
even if they were beneficiaries of the DSWD flagship
program, the Pamilyang Pantawid Pilipino Program (4Ps). This
is particularly alarming because their children's education
is neglected.
As a result, the goal of this study is to conduct an
assessment of the child laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan,
Catarman, Northern Samar, in order to pave the way for
1
U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Philippines: 2015 Findings on the Worst Forms of Labor:
Significant Advancement.”
5
future chances of helping these children avoid child labor
abuses.
Statement of the Problem
This study is designed to determine the extent of child
labor in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern Samar.
Specifically, this study attempts to answer the
following questions:
1. What is the socio-demographic characteristics of the
child laborers in terms of:
1.1 Age
1.2 Sex
1.3 Education
1.4 Income from labor
1.5 Type of work employed
1.6 Years of work as a laborer
2. What are the practices of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar?
3. What are the causes of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar?
4. What are the effects of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar?
6
Objectives of the Study
The following are the objectives of the study:
1. Describe the characteristics of the child laborers
in terms of:
1.1 Age
1.2 Sex
1.3 Education
1.4 Income from Labor
1.5 Type of Work Employed
1.6 Years of Work as a Laborer
2. Determine the practices of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar
3. Find out the causes of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar
4. Find out the effects of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, N. Samar
Significance of the Study
The result of the study will be beneficial to the
following:
Child laborers. As the primary beneficiary, findings
from this study could merit the child laborers in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern Samar. As such, provision of
7
laws as regards abolition of child labor would permit them
to enjoy their rights as children.
Parents. The result of this study may provide insights
for the parents to avoid letting their children work at an
early age. In this way, they could find possible and legal
means to support their family other than sending their
children to work.
LGU-Catarman. The result of this study may serve as
baseline information for the barangay officials and the
local officials in the municipality to provide adequate
assistance to the children who are into child labor.
Multisectoral actions especially with the involvement of
local governments, NGOs, and people’s organizations are
critical for effective and sustainable community-based
initiatives may be made to eradicate child labor practices
in the municipality.
Department of Social Welfare and Development. The
result of this study may substantially push the DSWD
personnel to intensively monitor the 4Ps beneficiaries
especially on the status of their children's education. This
is to discourage and avoid child labor practices which
usually happen in families living within the poverty line.
Department of Labor and Employment. The findings of
this study may urge the DOLE to monitor establishments or
8
residents that employ children. Through this, they could
establish legal means to penalize those establishments
employing child workers in Catarman, Northern Samar which
would essentially eradicate the problem on child labor.
NGO advocates on child labor. The result of this study
may allow NGO advocates on the eradication of child labor to
provide programs, projects and activities aiming at
restoring children’s rights in the municipality. Campaign
programs and education awareness are probable instruments
that will likely improve awareness among families on the
eradication of child labor practices.
Future researchers. The findings of this study may
serve as reference for researchers who are interested to
conduct same kind of study.
Scope and Limitation
This is a descriptive-method research which aims to
determine the child labor practices in Barangay Bangkerohan,
Catarman, Northern Samar.
Child laborers ages 10-17 years were the respondents of
the study. A survey questionnaire was used to gather
relevant data for the study.
The study was conducted during the School Year 2021-
2022. The First Semester was devoted to crafting of the
9
research proposal; while the Second Semester for writing the
final manuscript.
One of the limitations which this study may encounter
is locating the child laborers in the barangay under study.
Concealment of these child laborers may hamper data
collection for fear of being caught by authorities.
Theoretical Framework
The theory of Exploitative Child Labor developed by
Rogers and Swinnerton in 2002, states that children ended up
in exploitative child labor because their parents are
tricked by promises of a better life that prove not to be
true. Parents have some knowledge of the possibility of
exploitation when they enter their children into the labor
force. In equilibrium, they are willing or need to gamble.
On the other hand, some firms take advantage of this
willingness by exploiting children. But other firms do not;
in fact, if some firms did not indeed offer a better life
for children than they could obtain without working at all,
parents would not be willing to gamble. Thus, trickery or
deception as a route into exploitative child labor can only
exist as an equilibrium phenomenon if parents have some
reason to believe that their children can be better off
10
working, and that reason, we presume, is that some children
do end up better off by working. 2
This study is also anchored on the Endogenous Growth
Theory advocated by Lucas in 1988 in his third economic
development model which puts emphasis on human capital
investment through schooling to attain economic development.
In this essence, the government needs to invest in the
education of its human capital for economic development to
come by. Human capital is defined to be the stock of
competencies, knowledge, habits, social and personality
attributes, including creativity, cognitive abilities,
embodied in the ability to perform labor so as to produce
economic value.3
Furthermore, neoclassical models of household decision-
making are commonly employed in the analysis of child labor
and are typically derivative of Becker (1964). Models of
household bargaining fall into two broad categories: those
in which children have no bargaining power and those in
which children have some intrinsic value in the family. In
models in which children have no bargaining power in the
2
Carol Ann Rogers & Kenneth A. Swinnerton (2002) A Theory of Exploitative Child Labor,
retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6589454.pdf.
3
A. Liening, "Growth Theory and Endogenous Human Capital Development: A Contribution to the
Theory of Complex Systems," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2013, pp. 96-104. doi:
10.4236/tel.2013.32016.
11
household, parents make decisions that serve their own
interests, without regard for the impact on the child. This
class of models lends analytical support for public policies
that constrain the choices that parents are allowed to make
for their children, e.g., compulsory schooling, minimum age
of work, a ban on bonded child labor, etc.4
Conceptual Framework
This study is based on the premise that the
characteristics of the child laborers in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern Samar have a significant
relationship with the extent of child labor practices. On
sex, it is conceived in this study that the child labor is
practiced among male and female.
On education, children who do not attend schools are
more likely to engage in child labor than those children who
attend school.
On income from labor, this study assumes that children
who receive higher amount of money are more likely to engage
in child labor than children who receive less from their
work.
4
D.K. Brown, R.M. Stern, & A.V. Deardorff (2014) Child Labor: Theory, Evidence and Policy,
retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24137885_Child_Labor_Theory_Evidence_and_Policy.
12
On type of work employed, this study assumes that
children engage in child labor regardless of the type of
work they are employed but on the basis of earning income
from it.
On years of work as a laborer, this study conceived
that that those children who work for a longer of period of
time may highly practice child labor than those who worked
for a shorter period of time.
13
Paradigm
Characteristics of the child
laborers
Child labor practices
Causes of child labor
Effects of child labor
Figure 1. A paradigm showing the concept of the study
14
Definition of Terms
The terms and concepts herein discussed are defined
operationally and conceptually to convey easy understanding
on the part of the readers.
Age. In this study, this refers to the children’s time
of life at which some particular qualifications, power or
capacity. Apparently, this pertains to the number of years
the child laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman,
Northern Samar had lives since birth.
Child. This a refers to a person below 18 years of age
or those over but are unable to fully take care of
themselves or protect themselves from abuse, neglect,
cruelty, exploitation or discrimination because of a
physical or mental disability or condition (RA 7610).5
Child labor. It is an illegal employment of children
below the age of fifteen, where they are not directly under
the sole responsibility of their parents or legal guardian,
or the latter employs other workers apart from their
children, who are not members of their families, or their
work endangers their life, safety, health and morals or
impairs their normal development including schooling. It
also includes the situation of children below the age of
5
https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/ra_7610_1992.html.
15
eighteen [years] who are employed in hazardous occupation
(RA No. 7658).6
Child labor practices. As used in this study, this
refers to the regular activities engaged in by the children
in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern Samar which
requires either hard or soft manual labor to earn income.
Education. This refers to the level of education the
respondents attained.
Income from labor. This refers to the amount of money
received by the child laborers on a monthly or daily basis.
Sex. This refers to the gender classification of the
respondents identified as either male or female.
Type of work employed. This refers to a kind of work
engaged in by the respondents.
Years of work as a laborer. This refers to the number
of months or years the respondents have been engaged in
child labor.
CHAPTER II
6
Republic of the Philippines, RA No. 7568, An Act Prohibiting the Employment of Children Below
15 Years of Age in Public and Private Undertakings.
16
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Characteristics of child laborers
In 2011, there were about 3.3 million Filipino children
aged 5-17 who worked. Out of these, around 1.173 million or
about 35% had not attended school due to work with mostly
children aged 15-17 followed by those aged 10-14 not
attending school. 7
In many developing nations like the Philippines, it is
normal for children contribute to the family and household
economy. Anthropological studies have considered such
contribution by children culturally determined. For example,
Stenning in 1962 shows how the male children of Fulani
pastoralists assume huge responsibilities by the age of 7.
At that age they are considered competent enough to plan and
execute daily cattle grazing schedules. Given circumstances
that working children find themselves – financial, social or
cultural – do all aspects of child labor violate child
rights? Ultimately one asks: does child labor intrinsically
violate child rights?8
7
Philippine Statistics Authority, Final Results of the 2011 Survey on Children, Table 3,
https://psa.gov.ph/content/estimated-number-working-children-5-17-years-old-who-worked-during-past-
weekwas-33-million.
8
Fernando T. Aldaba, Leonardo A. Lanzona And Ronald J. Tamangan (2004), An Empirical Analysis
on the Trade-off between Schooling and Child Labor in the Philippines, Philippine Journal of Development
Number 58, Second Semester 2004, Volume XXXI, No. 2.
17
The study of Nelson and Quiton used a novel log linear
analysis to identify the factors that enhance and hamper
working children’s effort to receive education, stay healthy
and engage in recreational activities. It was found that the
dropout rate from school decreased when the number of
working hours and frequency of heavy physical work lessened.
Working for a relative, and when the child is an unpaid
worker did not affect their schooling as compared to
children who engaged in heavy physical work. Long working
hours meant less time for recreational activities. The
identification of these specific factors is useful for
policy makers in the Philippines who aim at reducing the
incidence of child labor.9
Only about 30% of child laborers get paid for their
primary occupation and about 40% get paid for their other
occupation. Among the unpaid child laborers, at least 90%
have their wages imputed using as basis the wages of paid
child laborers engaged in the same occupation, except for
unpaid child laborers engaged in other occupations during
the second quarter, where the proportion goes down to 81%.10
9
Nelson, G. L. M., & Quiton, J. D. (2017). Child Labor and Its Effects on Schooling, Health and
Recreation of Filipino Children. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 26(1), 68-82. Retrieved
from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/107375.
10
Ruperto P. Alonzo and Rosemarie G. Edillon (n.d.) ELIMINATING CHILD LABOR IN THE
PHILIPPINES, retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-
manila/documents/publication/wcms_437075.pdf.
18
Some of these children are forced to work at a very
young age about three to five years old by their parents.
Often these parents become too dependent on their children
up to the extent that they just stay home and let their
children work and simply waits for the wages. But in some
cases, parents do not really want their children stop going
to school and work. They try their best to earn in order to
sustain the needs of the family but due to circumstances
they have no choice but to let their children help them to
earn a living. Because of child labor they don’t have a deep
relationship with each other. “The family is, in fact, the
communities first socializing agency and the source of its
strength and stability.”11
Even though a relationship between child labor and
school attendance may exist, these factors only provide an
indirect measure of the educational consequences of the
child’s involvement in labor activities. In reality, other
characteristics are related to academic performance and the
intensity of the work. In fact, in certain cases, it is
shown that working minors also usually attend school,
suggesting that variables associated with academic
11
A Study of Child Labor in the Philippines (n.d.), retrieved from
https://aboutphilippines.org/documents-etc/Study-of-Child-Labor.pdf.
19
performance are those that show us the impact of child labor
on the minor’s education (Buonomo, 2011). 12
The study of Holgadoa investigated on the effects of
different variables of child labor on academic performance
are investigated. The results showed that labor conditions,
the number of weekly hours dedicated to work, and the
presence of work scheduled in the morning negatively
affected the academic performance of child laborers. These
results show that the relationship between child labor and
academic performance is based on the conflict between these
two activities. This study has implications for the
formulation of policies, programs, and interventions for
preventing, eradicating, and attenuating the negative
effects of child labor on the social and educational
development of children.13
There are factors that also affect the intensity of
child labor. For instance, Rosati and Rossi (2003) 14
found
that the number of family members in the home was negatively
12
Buonomo, M. (2011). The impact of child labor on schooling outcomes in Nicaragua. Economics
of Education Review, 30(6), 1527-1539.
13
Daniel Holgadoa, Isidro Maya-Jariegoa , Ignacio Ramosa , Jorge Palaciob , Óscar OviedoTrespalaciosb ,
Vanessa Romero-Mendozab and José Amarb (n.d.) Impact of Child Labor on Academic Performance:
Evidence from the Program “Edúcame Primero Colombia, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84872009.pdf.
14
Rosati, F. C., & Rossi, M. (2003). Children's Working Hours and School Enrollment: Evidence
from Pakistan and Nicaragua. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(2), 283- 295.
20
correlated to the number of hours the child worked.
Nonetheless, Murkjerhee and Das found that in India, family
size had an important effect on dropping out of school and
on increasing the incidence of child labor. 15
In this
sense, it is possible that other factors in addition to the
number of family members are associated with the
participation of minors in labor. For instance, for
Ravallion and Wodon, the family divides the child’s between
work and education according to the family’s regular level
of consumption and expenditures, the child’s previous
attendance to school and the time dedicated to leisure by
the family.16
Child Labor Practices
Child labor statistics reveal that poverty incidence
among families with child laborers was about twice the
national incidence rate. Furthermore, 85 percent of children
engaged in child labor were found in rural areas, and most
15
Mukherjee, D. & Das, S. (2008). Role of Parental Education in Schooling and Child Labour
Decision: Urban India in the Last Decade. Social Indicators Research, 89, 305- 322.
16
Ravallion, M., & Wodon, Q. (2000). Does Child Labour Displace Schooling Evidence on
Behavioural Responses to an Enrollment Subsidy. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 158-175.
21
of these children were found in Northern Mindanao, with
about 22 percent child labor incidence.17 Income from child
labor, therefore, is welcome to very low-income households
notwithstanding the setting. Child labor is necessary for
the survival of the household as resources and economic
opportunities are not sufficient to meet the household’s
minimum basic needs. Related to poverty is the lack or
absence of economic opportunities in the household’s
localities. Año studied the situation of child labor in the
pyrotechnics industry. He finds that there are no other
viable enterprises that can serve as livelihood sources for
the community, thus the alternative to engage in a rather
dangerous work.18
Edralin’s indepth studies on the situations of children
in the pyrotechnics industry and prostitution maintain that
limited economic opportunities impel children to engage in
these worst forms of child labor. 19
Brillantes also
mentions that employment of children in domestic service is
17
Alonzo, R. and R. Edillon. 2002. Eliminating Child Labor in the Philippines. Paper submitted to
the International Labour Organization as part of an ILO/ International Programme on the Elimination of
Child Labour (IPEC) study.
18
Año, D. 2002. A Cursory Assessment study on the Situation of Child Labor in the Pyrotechnics
Industry. A manuscript submitted to the International Labour Organization as part of an ILO/International
Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) study.
19
Edralin, D. 2002. Indepth study on the Situation of Child Labor in the Pyrotechnics Industry.
Paper submitted to the International Labour Organization as part of an ILO/International Programme on
the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) study.
22
spurred by their impoverished households, and children who
participate in domestic service come from economically
depressed regions and provinces in the Philippines, which
are characterized by lack of income-earning opportunities.
The lack or absence of income-providing economic
opportunities pushes the already poor household down to
deeper poverty. Poverty and the high cost of education for
poor families are reasons mentioned in the literature why
children of poor households do not attend school. Poor
households simply cannot afford to send their children to
school even with free primary and secondary education. This
is because attendant costs of sending children to school may
even be too much for a low-income household. 20
Another reason which Edralin mentions in her study was
the lack of access to schools. Particularly in rural areas,
the distant location of schools relative to the child’s
place of work or dwelling becomes a factor to consider.21
20
Brillantes,, R. 1996. Developing Strategic Services for Child Domestic Workers: Using Survey
Data on their Working and Living Conditions in Metro Manila, Manila: Bureau of Women and Young
Workers (BWYW), Department of Labor and Employment.
21
FERNANDO T. ALDABA, LEONARDO A. LANZONA AND RONALD J. TAMANGAN (2004) An
Empirical Analysis on the Trade-off between Schooling and Child Labor in the Philippines, Philippine
Journal of Development Number 58, Second Semester 2004, Volume XXXI, No. 2, retrieved from
https://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/pjd/pidspjd04-2childlabor.pdf.
23
The study of Fernandez and Abocejo examined the
relationship between poverty and child labor in the
Philippines by region. It investigated how school attendance
of working children relates to poverty incidence covering
the period 2008-2012. Findings revealed that poverty
incidence and prevalence of child labor were strongly
correlated. Similarly, poverty incidence strongly associates
with the number of working children not attending school.
Poverty displaces these children from school. School
children are enticed to participate in the labor force
because of short-term income opportunities. There is,
however, no relationship between prevalence of child labor
and the number of working children not attending school. It
is evident that children have taken on the responsibility of
augmenting the household incomes and of providing the needs
of their households. There is also enough evidence that
conclude that poverty pushes children to participate in the
labor force for them augment household income.22
The study of Halgadoa, et al., determined the effects
of different variables of child labor on academic
performance are investigated. The results showed that labor
conditions, the number of weekly hours dedicated to work,
22
Fernandez, Russell & Abocejo, Ferdinand. (2014). Child Labor, Poverty and School Attendance:
Evidences from the Philippines by Region. CNU Journal of Higher Education. Volume 8. 114-127.
24
and the presence of work scheduled in the morning negatively
affected the academic performance of child laborers. These
results show that the relationship between child labor and
academic performance is based on the conflict between these
two activities. These results do not indicate a linear and
simple relationship associated with the recognition of the
presence or absence of child labor. This study has
implications for the formulation of policies, programs, and
interventions for preventing, eradicating, and attenuating
the negative effects of child labor on the social and
educational development of children.23
Moreover, according to Webbink, Smits, and de Jong
propose a comprehensive model of different levels. For these
authors, the causes of child labor can be (a) the resources
related to family income, the job or the education of the
parents, (b) the structural characteristics, such as the
number of brothers or family members, the availability of
educational resources, and the level of urbanization, and
(c) the culture as it relates to the existing values and
norms associated with child labor. 24
23
Daniel Holgadoa , Isidro Maya-Jariegoa , Ignacio Ramosa , Jorge Palaciob , Óscar
OviedoTrespalaciosb , Vanessa Romero-Mendozab and José Ama (n.d.) Impact of Child Labor on Academic
Performance: Evidence from the Program “Edúcame Primero Colombia, CORE, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84872009.pdf.
24
Webbink, E., Smits, Jeroen, de Jong, E. (2011). Household and Context Determinants of Child
Labour in 221 Districs of 18 Developing Countries. Social Indicators Research, Online First.
25
Amar et al., on the quality of life and mental health
of child laborers in Toluviejo, Colombia noted that the
entrenchment of child labor in the culture of the country is
a way for the child to contribute to the family economy or a
way for the child to learn vital habits for the future. In
addition, the authors note that the reasons for the labor of
minors reported by the adults differ according to the
children’s age. Thus, for 15- to 17-year-old youth, labor
entails an important contribution to their development and
to the role that they will carry out in the future. For
younger children, an allusion is made to economic issues
related to the need for the child to contribute to the
family income.25
Jensen and Nielsen showed a clear relationship exists
between poverty levels or low income and the participation
of children and teenagers in labor-related activities.
Elevated poverty levels can force families to send their
children to work, thereby preventing the children from
investing in the human capital developed by their attending
school. 26
25
Amar, J., Palacio, J., Llinás, H., Puerta, L., Sierra, E., Pérez, A. M., & Velásquez, B. (2008). Calidad
de Vida y Salud Mental en Menores Trabajadores de Toluviejo [Quality of life and mental health in child
workers from Toluviejo]. Suma Psicológica, 15(2), 385- 410.
26
Jensen, P., & Nielsen, H. S. (1997). Child labour or school attendance? Evidence from Zambia.
Journal of Population Economics, 10(4), 407-424.
26
Moreover, Murkjerhee and Das noted that among those
parents with greater educational levels, there is a lower
frequency of their children engaging in manual labor. This
finding is probably due to their awareness of the negative
effects of child labor on the child’s development. 27
In this
sense, Kim and Zepeda, who investigated the factors related
to children’s involvement on family farms in the United
States, found that there are factors that affect youth in
different ways at different points of the work cycle, that
is, as they first begin working and at a certain point later
in their work cycle. 28
In the first case, the decision of the parents for
their children to contribute to family work is influenced by
the consideration that this will benefit the children in
processes, such as social development, responsibility,
strengthening of family bonds, and vital learning. However,
the economic factors seem to have a greater influence on the
level of involvement of the children. In fact, work
decreases in intensity and duration when the economic
conditions of the family improve.29
27
Mukherjee, D. & Das, S. (2008). Role of Parental Education in Schooling and Child Labour
Decision: Urban India in the Last Decade. Social Indicators Research, 89, 305- 322.
28
Kim, J., & Zepeda, L. (2004). Factors Affecting Children's Participation and Amount of Labor on
Family Farms. Journal of Safety Research, 35(4), 391-401.
29
Lee, B. C., Jenkins, L. S., & Westaby, J. D. (1997). Factors Influencing Exposure of Children to
Major Hazards on Family Farms. The Journal of Rural Health, 13(3), 206- 215.
27
Pedraza and Ribero found that when the head of the
family was the mother, the children and teenagers were
exclusively dedicated to studying, unlike those cases in
which the head of the family was the father. They concluded
that an exchange between the decision to working or study
apparently exists among children. That is, there is a
change, in varying degrees, among youth from the educational
context to that of labor, as there can be cases where both
activities are carried out simultaneously. This combination
of working and attending school was significantly present
among 12- to 17-year-old youth. However, this was not the
case with the group of 7- to 11-year-old who devoted their
time to school attendance to a greater extent. This finding
could be partly due to the intensive campaigns that have
been carried out in Colombia in favor of the provision of
basic elementary education.30
30
Pedraza, A. C., & Ribero, R. (2006). El Trabajo Infantil y Juvenil en Colombia y Algunas De Sus
Consecuencias Claves. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud., 4(1), 2-28.
28
26
Chapter III
METHODOLOGY
Locale of the Study
This study was conducted in Barangay Bangkerohan,
Catarman, Northern Samar. Catarman, officially
the Municipality of Catarman, (Waray: Bungto san
Catarman; Tagalog: Bayan ng Catarman), is a 1st
class municipality and capital of the province of Northern
Samar, Philippines. According to the 2020 census, it has a
population of 97,879 people. It is the largest municipality
29
in terms of land area and population in the province. It is
the commercial, educational, financial, political and
government center of the province.
Catarman lies on the northern part of Samar Island,
bounded to the east by Mondragon, to the west by Bobon, to
the south by Lope de Vega, and to the north by
the Philippine Sea. On the Pacific coast are flat lowlands
with the interior characterized by outlying low hills. Mount
Puyao in Barangay Liberty is the highest peak in the area.
The Catarman River, a major provincial river, divides the
eastern and the western parts of the town. It is fed by the
Paticua, Hibulwangan, Mahangna, Tura, and Danao creeks
together with lesser prominent estuaries.
30
Figure 2. Map of the Municipality of Catarman, Northern
Samar
Research Design
In this research, quantitative methodology specifically
descriptive method of research was used to determine the
profile, and the child labor practices, and their issues and
challenges in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern
Samar.
The Respondents
The respondents of the study were child workers and
child laborers themselves who are living in Barangay
Bangekerohan, Catarman, Northern Samar. They were chosen as
the respondents because they could supply information about
their profile and the child labor practices.
The Research Instrument
This study made use of a researchers-made survey
questionnaire. The research instrument consisted of four
parts. Part I investigated into the profile of the
respondents such as age, sex, educational attainment,
position and trainings attended. Part II asked into the
perception about child labor practices. Part III contained
31
the causes and reasons of engagement in child labor. And the
last part, Part IV was concerned with the effects of child
labor.
Validation of the Research Instrument
For purpose of testing the validity and reliability of
the research instrument, the instrument was checked and
reviewed for corrections and accurateness by the Research-
Adviser.
Population and Sampling Technique
This study purposively chose thirty (30) child workers
and laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman, Northern
Samar. Therefore, child workers and laborers identified in
the barangay were the respondents of the study.
Data Gathering Procedures
In the process of research work, this study utilized
various forms of data gathering procedures.
In identifying the target respondents, this study
secured a list of children who are working from the Office
of the Punong Barangay in Brgy. Bangkerohan, Catarman,
Northern Samar.
32
In collecting the data through a researchers-made
survey questionnaire, the researchers personally
administered to ensure that all its questions are answered.
Prior to the actual administration of the research
instrument, a letter of intent was attached to the survey
questionnaire seeking approval of the conduct of the
research to avoid misconception and misinterpretation among
its respondents.
However, the researchers strictly followed the
necessary health protocols during the collection to avoid
contradicting COVID-19 infection.
Statistical Treatment of Data
This study made use of different types of statistical
tools to analyze and interpret the data gathered such as the
following:
Frequency counts, percentage and means computation were
used to analyze the data that were obtained from the
respondents.
For percentage, the formula is:
33
f
P= x 100
n
Where:
P - percentage
f - frequency
n - number of respondents
100 – constant multiplier
For the mean, the formula is:
∑x
x=
N
Where:
x - mean
∑ - summation
N - number of respondents
Chapter IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Demographic Profile
Age
Table 1 presents data based on the distribution of
respondents with respect to its age. As shows in the table
there were 1 respondent or 3.33 percent in the age of 12, 4
34
respondents in the age of 13 or 13.33 percent, 3 respondents
or 10 percent in the age of 14, 3 respondents or 10 percent
in the age of 15, 7 respondents or 23.33 percent in the age
of 16 and 12 respondents or 40 percent in the age of 17.
This data indicates that the majority of child laborers
in Barangay Bangkerohan were in the age of 17 years old. The
least number of respondents are in the age of 12 years old.
Sex
Table 1 presents data base of the respondents with
respect to its sex. Statistical data reveals that 19
respondents or 63.33 percent were male and 11 respondents or
36.66 percent were female. This means that male composes a
greater number of the respondents.
Education
Table 1 reveals that with regards to education level
of 30 respondents, attends school regularly got the most
number with 20 or 66.66 percent and the rest got a least
number of education level. This implied that majority of the
respondents were studying and at the same time working.
Income from labor
35
Table 1 reveals that with regards to the income of
laborers out of 30 respondents, a labor of Php 2, 000 or
below got the most number with 29 or 96.66 percent and the
rest are with number of 1 or 3.33 percent in the amount of
income of Php 2, 100 to 5, 000 per month. This implied that
majority of the respondents has an income of Php 2,000 or
below per month.
Types of work employed
Table 1 reveals that with respect to types of work of
30 respondents, construction worker got the most number with
12 or 40 percent and the rest has a least number of types of
work employed. This means that majority of the child
laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan are construction worker.
Years of work
Table 1 reveals that with regards to years of work of
30 respondents, less than one year got the most number with
19 or 63.33 percent and the rest has a least number in the
years of work. This implied that majority of the respondents
has been engage to child labor for less than one year.
Table 1
Respondents Profile
Profile Frequency Percent
36
Age
12 years old 1 3.33
13 years old 4 13.33
14 years old 3 10
15 years old 3 10
16 years old 7 23.33
17 years old 12 40
Total 30 100
Sex
Male 19 63.33
Female 11 36.66
Total 30 100
Education
Elementary Level 1 3.33
Elementary Graduate 2 6.66
Highschool Level 4 13.33
Highschool Graduate 3 10
Attends school regularly 20 66.66
Total 30 100
Income from labor
Php 2,000 or below 29 96.66
per month
Php 2,100 - 5,000 1 3.33
per month
Total 30 100
Type of work employed
Housekeeper 5 16.66
37
Quarry worker 4 13.33
Construction worker 12 40
Farming 6 20
Vending 2 6.66
PD Cab driver 1 3.33
Total 30 100
Years of work
Less than 1 year 19 63.33
1 – 3 years 8 26.66
4 years or more 3 10
Total 30 100
Child Labor Practices
The data in Table 2 shows the practices of child
laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan. The data revealed that
majority of the responses on the practices are often with
3.95 grand mean.
38
The data also revealed that the child laborers always
worked to support for their family’s need, worked because no
one of the family is able to provide, was force to work
because no one supports the child laborer with 8.84, 6.63,
and 5.44 weighted mean respectively. It indicates that the
child laborers work in order to sustain their needs due to
poverty, lack of decent work opportunities for adults and
adolescents.
Table 2
Child Labor Practices
Weighted
Practices Interpretation
Mean
I worked to support for
8.84 Always
my family's needs
I worked because no one 6.63 Always
in the family is able to
39
provide for the family
I worked all day and
3 Sometimes
night
I was forced to work
because my parents
5.44 Always
cannot support my
studies
I worked as a laborer
because our place had no 3.22 Sometimes
existing school
I worked because I want
4.06 Often
to buy my personal needs
I worked because there
are job opportunities 0.13 Always
available in our place
I worked because my
parents want me to
3.98 Often
become responsible when
I grow up
I worked because I was
influenced by my friends
4.04 Often
who are also into child
labor
I do hard labor in a day 3.37 Often
I work because no one
3.35 Often
supports me
Child labor is a way of
2.21 Seldom
life in our place
Working allows me to be
3.53 Sometimes
physically fit
Working allows me to be
3.65 Often
mentally fit
As a child worker, I can
contribute to the 3.79 Often
economy of our locality
Grand Mean 3.95 Often
Causes of Child Labor
Table 3 shows the causes of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman Northern Samar. The data revealed that
40
no regular income ranked 1 as the main cause of child labor
with 26 responses, followed by lack of support and
encouragement from family with 19 responses, and lack of
jobs, employment or insufficient salary of the parents
ranked 3 with 17 responses from the respondents. This
indicates that these causes are the top most as perceived by
the child laborers. Children are expected to follow in their
parents' footsteps in a particular trade, and to learn and
practice that trade at a very early age. The data shows that
these causes are still widespread largely because of the
vulnerability of poor families to such pressures.
Table 3
Causes of Child Labor
Causes Frequency Rank
No regular income 26 1
41
Lack of support and
encouragement from 19 2
family
Lack of jobs, employment
or insufficient salary 17 3
of the parents
Sickness of parents or
other members of the 17 4
family
Family beliefs and
10 5
practices
Violence inside the home 9 6
Lack of social
5 7
protection
Limited access to
4 8.5
education
Weak enforcement of
4 8.5
local laws
Lack of assets and
properties such as land,
animals, that maybe a 3 10.5
source of income during
emergency situations
Lack or insufficient
3 10.5
social services
Influence oof vices in
the community (smoking, 2 12
drugs, gambling)
Violence and other
conflicts in the 1 13
community
Effects of Child Labor
42
Table 4 shows the effects of child labor in Barangay
Bangkerohan, Catarman Northern Samar. The data revealed that
its hard to focus on task assigned got the highest rank with
29 responses, followed by the statement of irritable because
of fatigue from work with 20 responses and with 19 responses
is afraid to mingle and have friends. This indicates that
working children had a hard time synchronizing study with
work because of the fact that their work loads are not only
physically draining them but also mentally and emotionally
as well as having a hard time socializing with others. The
data shows various effects which take away their freedom
and enjoy their youth.
Table 4
Effects of Child Labor
43
Effects Frequency Rank
Find it hard to
focus on task 29 1
assigned
Irritable because of
20 2
fatigue from work
Afraid to mingle and
19 3
have friends
Low self steem 18 4
Thin, sickly and
stunned height and 13 5
overall growth
Hunchbacked due to
lifting of heavy 12 6
objects at work
Loses their respect
11 7
to parents
They can only get
low paying and 8 8
unskilled jobs
Lung problems due to
exposure to fumes in 9
4
the workplace
Skin disease due to
exposures to 3 10.5
chemicals
Minimal
opportunities to
remove oneself from
poverty due to lack 3 10.5
of skills, sickness,
and low level of
education
Arrogant because of
the earned money 2 12
from working
44
Chapter V
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY
The study was conceptualized to determine the child
labor in Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman Northern Samar.
Specially, it sought to find out the profile of the
respondents in terms of; age, sex, education, income from
labor, type of work employed, and years of work. To
determine the practices of child labor, to find out the
causes of child labor as well as to find out the effect of
child labor. The respondents of the study were 30 child
laborers age 10 to 17 years old.
This study was conducted in the province of Northern
Samar particularly at Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman Norther
Samar. Following the descriptive research design, a
questionnaire was used as the main tool for data gathering
with the respondents to validate the responses. The
respondents were the child laborers that is randomly
selected. The questionnaire was personally administered and
retrieved. The data were treated statistically using
frequency counts, percentage, rank and weighted mean.
45
Apparently, most of the respondents were male than
female, 17 years old, majority of the type of work are
construction worker and do attends school regularly. Child
laborers deals with this hazardous work for less than one
(1) year with an income from labor a sum of Php 2,000 or
below per month, at a very young age, children go to work,
sacrifice their future and health risk just to fulfill their
day-to-day existence, most especially the family needs. It
is inside the home that force a child to go to work at a
very young age because of the circumstances that happens
within the family and as a result, due to some heavy works,
a child faces a lot of complications not only to their
physical appearance but also their mental health. The health
effects of which may be evident until adulthood.
Conclusion and Implications
The following conclusions and implications were drawn
based on the findings of the study:
The respondents were young male, informal workers with
low monthly income and attends school via module. The data
implies that because of their being poor, the respondents
are forced by those circumstances to work and help their
parents earn extra income.
46
The respondents go to work at an early age due to the
reason that they need to provide for their family needs.
This implies that they worked for their survival and that
their family depends on them because the parent’s income is
insufficient to support the needs. This appears to be the
main reason children look for their own sources of income.
They see it as the best use of their time in contributing to
meet the needs of the family.
Recommendations
This study revealed the child labor practices in
Barangay Bangkerohan, Catarman Northern Samar. Thus, the
following recommendations are hereby presented.
1. The child labor practices has been proven to exist. The
barangay local government is encouraged to conduct
awareness raising activities for parents so as to avoid
child labor.
2. Department of Labor and Employment is encouraged to
monitor establishments or residents that employ
children.
3. A similar study must be conducted in a larger community
to determine if similar findings could be established.
47
LITERATURE CITED
A Study of Child Labor in the Philippines (n.d.), retrieved
from https://aboutphilippines.org/documents-etc/Study-of-
Child-Labor.pdf.
Aldaba, Fernando T.; Lanzona; Leonardo A.; and Tamangan,
Ronald J. (2004), An Empirical Analysis on the Trade-off
between Schooling and Child Labor in the Philippines,
Philippine Journal of Development Number 58, Second
Semester 2004, Volume XXXI, No. 2.
Alonzo, R. and R. Edillon. 2002. Eliminating Child Labor in
the Philippines. Paper submitted to the International
Labour Organization as part of an ILO/ International
Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) study,
retrieved from
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-
bangkok/---ilo-manila/documents/publication/
wcms_437075.pdf.
Amar, J., Palacio, J., Llinás, H., Puerta, L., Sierra, E.,
Pérez, A. M., & Velásquez, B. (2008). Calidad de Vida y
Salud Mental en Menores Trabajadores de Toluviejo [Quality
of life and mental health in child workers from
Toluviejo]. Suma Psicológica, 15(2).
Año, D. 2002. A Cursory Assessment Study on the Situation of
Child Labor in the Pyrotechnics Industry. A manuscript
submitted to the International Labour Organization as part
of an ILO/International Programme on the Elimination of
Child Labour (IPEC) study.
Buonomo, M. (2011). The Impact of Child Labor on Schooling
Outcomes in Nicaragua. Economics of Education Review,
30(6).
Brillantes, R. 1996. Developing Strategic Services for Child
Domestic Workers: Using Survey Data on their Working and
Living Conditions in Metro Manila, Manila: Bureau of Women
and Young Workers (BWYW), Department of Labor and
Employment.
Brown, D.K.; Stern,R.M. & A.V. Deardorff (2014) Child Labor:
Theory, Evidence and Policy, retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24137885_Child_La
bor_Theory_Evidence_and_Policy.
Edralin, D. 2002. Indepth Study on the Situation of Child
Labor in the Pyrotechnics Industry. Paper submitted to the
International Labour Organization as part of an
ILO/International Programme on the Elimination of Child
Labour (IPEC) study.
48
Fernandez, Russell & Abocejo, Ferdinand. (2014). Child Labor,
Poverty and School Attendance: Evidences from the
Philippines by Region. CNU Journal of Higher Education.
Volume 8.
Holgadoa, Daniel; Maya-Jariegoa, Isidro; Ramosa, Ignacio;
Palacio, Jorge; Trespalacios, Óscar Oviedo; Romero-
Mendoza, Vanessa; and, Amar, José (n.d.) Impact of Child
Labor on Academic Performance: Evidence from the Program
“Edúcame Primero Colombia, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84872009.pdf.
Jacobus de Hoop, Jed Friedman, Eeshani Kandpal & Furio Rosati
(2017) Child Schooling and Child Work in the Presence of a
Partial Education Subsidy, DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES, IZA DP
No. 10992, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, retrieved
from http://ftp.iza.org/dp10992.pdf.
Jensen, P., & Nielsen, H. S. (1997). Child Labour or School
Attendance? Evidence from Zambia. Journal of Population
Economics, 10(4).
Kim, J., & Zepeda, L. (2004). Factors Affecting Children's
Participation and Amount of Labor on Family Farms. Journal
of Safety Research, 35(4).
Lee, B. C., Jenkins, L. S., & Westaby, J. D. (1997). Factors
Influencing Exposure of Children to Major Hazards on
Family Farms. The Journal of Rural Health, 13(3).
Liening, A. "Growth Theory and Endogenous Human Capital
Development: A Contribution to the Theory of Complex
Systems," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3 No. 2,
2013, pp. 96-104. doi: 10.4236/tel.2013.32016.
Mukherjee, D. & Das, S. (2008). Role of Parental Education in
Schooling and Child Labour Decision: Urban India in the
Last Decade. Social Indicators Research, 89.
Nelson, G. L. M., & Quiton, J. D. (2017). Child Labor and Its
Effects on Schooling, Health and Recreation of Filipino
Children. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS],
26(1), 68-82. Retrieved from
https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/10
7375.
Pedraza, A. C., & Ribero, R. (2006). El trabajo infantil y
juvenil en Colombia y algunas de sus consecuencias claves.
Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y
Juventud., 4(1).
Philippine Statistics Authority, Final Results of the 2011
Survey on Children, Table 3,
https://psa.gov.ph/content/estimated-number-working-
children-5-17-years-old-who-worked-during-past-weekwas-33-
million.
49
Ravallion, M., & Wodon, Q. (2000). Does Child Labour Displace
Schooling? Evidence on Behavioural Responses to an
Enrollment Subsidy. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 158-
175.
Republic of the Philippines, RA No. 7568, An Act Prohibiting
the Employment of Children Below 15 Years of Age in Public
and Private Undertakings.
Rogers, Carol Ann & Swinnerton, Kenneth A. (2002) A Theory of
Exploitative Child Labor, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6589454.pdf
Rosati, F. C., & Rossi, M. (2003). Children's Working Hours
and School Enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and
Nicaragua. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(2).
Understanding Children's Work. Forthcoming. "Understanding
Children's Work and Youth Employment Outcomes in the
Philippines."
U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Philippines: 2015 Findings on
the Worst Forms of Labor: Significant Advancement.”
Webbink, E., Smits, Jeroen, de Jong, E. (2011). Household and
Context Determinants of Child Labour in 221 Districs of 18
Developing Countries. Social Indicators Research, Online
First.
https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/
ra_7610_1992.html.
50
Appendix A
Letter to the Dean
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Art and Communication
University of Eastern Philippines
University Town, Northern Samar
Madam:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN SAMAR.”
In connection with this, please allow us to conduct
a data gathering to the respondents.
Thank you so much.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
Noted:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
51
JOSE E. GABON, JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
Approved:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Arts and Communication
Appendix B
52
Letter to the Department Chair
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
JOSE E. GABON JR., DCJE
Officer In-charge
Criminology Department
College of Arts and Communication
Sir:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN”
We have constructed survey questionnaires to gather
data for this study.
In connection with this, we would like to ask
permission to conduct survey to gather the data needed in
this study. We are hoping that this request will be
granted and approved.
Thank you very much for your response.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
53
Recommending Approval:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
Approved:
JOSE E. GABON. JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
54
Appendix C
Letter to the Respondents
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
Dear Respondents:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN SAMAR.”
In line with this, please give us a little of your
time to conduct a data gathering regarding our study.
The researchers further assure you that all the data
gathered will be kept confidential and will only be used
for this study.
Thank you.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
Noted:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
55
Recommending Approval:
JOSE E. GABON, JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
Approved:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Arts and Communication
56
Appendix D
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Name (Optional):
Part I. Socio-demographic characteristics
1. Age
2. Sex [ ] male [ ] female
3. Education
[ ] No education at all
[ ] Elementary level
[ ] Elementary graduate
[ ] High school level
[ ] High school graduate
[ ] Attends school regularly
[ ] Do not attend school regularly
4. Income from labor
[ ] Php 2,000.00 or below per month
[ ] Php 2,100-5,000.00 per month
[ ] Php 5,100 or more per month
5. Type of work employed
[ ] housekeeper [ ] fishing
[ ] quarry worker [ ] vending
[ ] construction worker [ ] PD Cab driver
[ ] farming
[ ] others, pls. specify
6. Years of work
[ ] less than 1 year
[ ] 1-3 years
[ ] 4 years or more
57
Part II. Child Labor Practices
Directions: Please check on the space provided your perception
about child labor practices based on the following scale:
Strongly agree Disagree
Moderately agree Strongly disagree
Agree
Practices Strongly Moderately Agree Disagree Strongly
agree agree disagree
1. I worked to support for
my family's needs
2. I worked because no one
in the family is able
to provide for the
family
3. I worked all day and
night
4. I was forced to work
because my parents
cannot support my
studies
5. I worked as a laborer
because our place had
no existing school
6. I worked because I want
to buy my personal
needs
7. I worked because there
are job opportunities
available in our place
8. I worked because my
parents want me to
become responsible when
I grow up
9. I worked because I was
influenced by my
friends who are also
into child labor
10. I do hard labor
in a day
11. I work because no
one supports me
12. Child labor is a
way of life in our
place
13. Working allows me
to be physically fit
14. Working allows me
to be mentally fit
15. As a child
worker, I can
contribute to the
economy of our locality
58
Part III. Causes of Child Labor
Directions Please check the causes and reasons why you engaged
in child labor?
( ) Family beliefs and practices
( ) Sickness of parents or other members of the family
( ) Lack of support and encouragement from family
( ) Violence inside the home
( ) Lack of jobs, employment or insufficient salary of the
parents
( ) No regular income
( ) Lack of assets and properties such as land, animals, that
maybe a source of income during emergency situations
( ) Lack or insufficient social services
( ) Violence and other conflicts in the community
( ) Influence of vices in the community (smoking, drugs,
gambling)
( ) Lack of social protection
( ) Limited access to education
( ) Weak enforcement of local laws
( ) Others pls. specify
Part IV. Effects of Child Labor
( ) Hard to continue with schooling because of exhausted from
work and cannot concentrate on the lesson
( ) Find it hard to focus on tasks assigned
( ) Afraid to mingle and make friends
( ) Losses their respect to parents
( ) Thin, sickly and stunted height and overall growth
( ) Skin disease due to exposure to chemicals
( ) Lung problems due to exposure to fumes in the workplace
( ) Hunchbacked due to lifting of heavy objects at work
( ) Low self esteem
( ) Arrogant because of the money earned from working
( ) Irritable because of fatigue from work
( ) They can only get low paying and unskilled jobs
59
( ) Minimal opportunity to remove oneself from poverty due to
lack of skills, sickness, sickliness, and low level of
education
( ) Others pls. specify
Thank you!
60
Appendix D
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Ngaran (Opsyunal):
Una na Parti. Pangkalugaringon
Edad
1. Kinatawhan [ ] lalaki [ ] babaye
2. Edukasyon
[ ] waray iniskwelahan
[ ] abot la elementary an iniskwelahan
[ ] nakatangpos sa elementary
[ ] abot la hayskul an iniskwelahan
[ ] nakatangpos sa hayskul
[ ] nasulod pa permi sa eskwelahan
[ ] danay nala nasulod sa eskwelahan
3. Sweldo san pagtrabaho
[ ] Php 2,000.00 o paubos pa kada bulan
[ ] Php 2,100-5,000.00 kada bulan
[ ] Php 5,100 o mas dako pa kada bulan
4. Klase san ginsudlan na trabaho
[ ] kabulig sa sulod sa panimalay [ ] panagat
[ ] manbabaras [ ] paragbaligya
[ ] konstruksyon worker o pagtukod [ ] PD Cab
drayber
[ ] pag-uma
[ ] an iba, alayon pakibutang
5. Tuig san pagtrabaho
[ ] ubos pa sa sayu katuig
[ ] 1-3 katuig
[ ] 4 katuig o lahos pa
61
Ikaduwa nga Parti. Child labor practices
Direksyun: Alayun paki tsek san espasyo basis a iyo pagkasabot
sine nga tag batan-on nga trabahador:
Pag-uyon kusog Dire pag-uyon
Tama la nga pag-uyon Dire gud pag-uyon
Pag-uyon
Practices Pag-uyon Tama la Pag- Dire Dire gud
kusog nga pag- uyon pag-uyon pag-uyon
uyon
1. Nagtrabaho ak para
suportahan an
pangihalangnon saak
pamilya.
2. Nagtrabaho ak tungod sa
rason nga wara bisan
sayo an makahatag saak
kinahanglanon sa akon
ak pamilya
3. Nagtratrabaho ak bug-os
na adlaw ngan gabe
4. Napiritan ak magtrabaho
tungod sa dire kaya
saak pamilya suportahan
ak pag eskwela
5. Nagtratrabago ak bilang
sayo na trabahador
tungod sa wara saam
eskwelan
6. Nagtratrabaho ak para
makapalit saak
kalugaringon na
pangihanglanon
7. Nagtratrabaho ak kay
tungod nga may puydi
masudlan na trabaho
8. Nagtratrabaho ak kay
tungod sa karuyag saak
kag anak nga maging
responsibilidad ak
pagdako
9. Nagtratrabaho ak kay
tungod nga
naimpluwensyahan ak
saak kasangkayan nga
batan-on pa nga
nananrabaho na
10. Mabug-at na trabahuon
ak inhihimo sa sayo
kaadlaw
11. Nagtratrabaho ak kay
tungod sa wara saak
nasuporta
12. An pagigin batan-on nga
62
trabahador an pamaagi
san pangabuhi saam lugar
13. An pagtratrabaho an
nakakahatag saak libsog
nga pangalawason
14. An pagtratrabaho an
naghahatag saak maupay
nga pangisipan
15. Bilang sayo nga batan-
on nga trabahador,
makakaamot naak gihapon
sa ekonomiya san aton
lokalidad.
Ikatulo na Parti. Causes of child labor
Direksyun: Alayon paki tsek san rason kay nano na nahibutang
kamo sa pagigin batan-on nga trabahador.
( ) Tinuohan ngan buruhaton san pamilya
( ) Pagkasakit sa kag-anak o sa iba nga membro sa pamilya
( ) Kulang sa suporta ngan pagpakaupay san pamilya
( ) Kapintasan sa sulod sa panimalay
( ) Kawara san trabaho o dire sakto ngan kulang na sweldo san
kag-anak
( ) Wara permanente na kita
( ) Kakulangan san mga kabtanan sugad san tuna, kahayopan nga
puydi pagkuwaan san panahon sa pagkuri ngan
pangahilangnon
( ) Kakulangan san serbisyo sa pangkatawhan
( ) Kapintasan ngan iba pa nga saramok sa komunidad
( ) Impluwensya san pagbisyo sugad san pagpansigarilyo, droga
ngan paghuygo
( ) Kakulangan proteksyon sa pangkatawhan
( ) Limitado nga akses sa edukasyon
( ) Maluya ngan pagpatuman san local nga mga balaod
( ) An iba, alayun pakibutang ________________
63
Ikaupat na Parti. Effects of child labor
( ) Kakurian san pagpadayon san pag-aram tungod san katanglay
sa trabaho ngan dire makaatinder sa mga leksyon
( ) Nakukurian maka pokus sa mga ginhatag na hirimuon
( ) Hadok makihalobilo ngan makisangkay
( ) Pagkawara respito o pagtahod sa kag-anak
( ) MAhugos, sarakitnon ngan pagtuok sa kahataas tas pagtubo
( ) Sakit sa panit tungod sa pagka-ekspos sa kemikalSS
( ) Problema sa baga tungod sa pagka-ekspos alisngaw sa
gintratrabahuan
( ) Pagkakubaog tungod sa pag-alsa magbug-at
( ) Hamubo nga pag-imod sa pangkalugaringon
( ) Pagkahambog tungod sa may kwarta pagtrinabaho
( ) Pagkauyam tungod sa kapagal sa trabaho
( ) Pagkakuha dito nga kantidad san sweldo ngan dire
pagkahasa sa trabaho
( ) Ditoy na higayon nga makatalwas sa kakurian tungod sa
tungod sa kakulang sa kahasa, sakiton ngan dito nga
inadman
( ) An iba, alayon pakibutang
Salamat!
64
Population and Sampling Technique
This study will purposively choose thirty ten (30)
child workers and laborers in Barangay Bangkerohan,
Catarman, Northern Samar. Therefore, child workers and
laborers identified in the barangay will become the
respondents of the study.
Data Gathering Procedures
In the process of research work, this study will
utilize various forms of data gathering procedures.
In identifying the target respondents, this study
will serve a list of children who are working from the
Office of the Punong Barangay in Brgy. Bangkerohan,
Catarman, Northern Samar.
In collecting the primary source of data which is
the researchers-made survey questionnaire, the
researchers will personally administer to ensure that all
its questions will be answered. Likewise, retrieval of
the research instrument will take place the day after all
the survey questionnaires will be answered by the
respondents. However, prior to the actual administration
of the research instrument, a letter of intent is
attached to the survey questionnaire seeking approval of
the conduct of the research to avoid misconception and
misinterpretation among its respondents.
65
However, the researcher will strictly follow the
necessary health protocols during the collection to avoid
from acquiring COVID-19 infection.
Statistical Treatment of Data
This study will make use of different types of
statistical tools to analyze and interpret the data
gathered such as the following:
Descriptive analysis for respondents’ data,
frequency, and mean will be used to measure its
variability and to test the relationship between the two
characteristics and the child labor practices.
For percentage, the formula is:
f
P=
N ×100
Where:
P = percentage
f = frequency
N = number of respondents
100 = constant
For the mean, the formula is:
∑x
x=
N
Where:
x = mean
66
∑ = summation
N = number of respondents
LITERATURE CITED
A Study of Child Labor in the Philippines (n.d.), retrieved
from https://aboutphilippines.org/documents-etc/Study-of-
Child-Labor.pdf.
Aldaba, Fernando T.; Lanzona; Leonardo A.; and Tamangan,
Ronald J. (2004), An Empirical Analysis on the Trade-off
between Schooling and Child Labor in the Philippines,
Philippine Journal of Development Number 58, Second
Semester 2004, Volume XXXI, No. 2.
Alonzo, R. and R. Edillon. 2002. Eliminating Child Labor in
the Philippines. Paper submitted to the International
Labour Organization as part of an ILO/ International
Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC) study,
retrieved from
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-
bangkok/---ilo-manila/documents/publication/
wcms_437075.pdf.
Amar, J., Palacio, J., Llinás, H., Puerta, L., Sierra, E.,
Pérez, A. M., & Velásquez, B. (2008). Calidad de Vida y
Salud Mental en Menores Trabajadores de Toluviejo [Quality
of life and mental health in child workers from
Toluviejo]. Suma Psicológica, 15(2).
Año, D. 2002. A Cursory Assessment Study on the Situation of
Child Labor in the Pyrotechnics Industry. A manuscript
submitted to the International Labour Organization as part
of an ILO/International Programme on the Elimination of
Child Labour (IPEC) study.
67
Buonomo, M. (2011). The Impact of Child Labor on Schooling
Outcomes in Nicaragua. Economics of Education Review,
30(6).
Brillantes, R. 1996. Developing Strategic Services for Child
Domestic Workers: Using Survey Data on their Working and
Living Conditions in Metro Manila, Manila: Bureau of Women
and Young Workers (BWYW), Department of Labor and
Employment.
Brown, D.K.; Stern,R.M. & A.V. Deardorff (2014) Child Labor:
Theory, Evidence and Policy, retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24137885_Child_La
bor_Theory_Evidence_and_Policy.
Edralin, D. 2002. Indepth Study on the Situation of Child
Labor in the Pyrotechnics Industry. Paper submitted to the
International Labour Organization as part of an
ILO/International Programme on the Elimination of Child
Labour (IPEC) study.
Fernandez, Russell & Abocejo, Ferdinand. (2014). Child Labor,
Poverty and School Attendance: Evidences from the
Philippines by Region. CNU Journal of Higher Education.
Volume 8.
Holgadoa, Daniel; Maya-Jariegoa, Isidro; Ramosa, Ignacio;
Palacio, Jorge; Trespalacios, Óscar Oviedo; Romero-
Mendoza, Vanessa; and, Amar, José (n.d.) Impact of Child
Labor on Academic Performance: Evidence from the Program
“Edúcame Primero Colombia, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84872009.pdf.
Jacobus de Hoop, Jed Friedman, Eeshani Kandpal & Furio Rosati
(2017) Child Schooling and Child Work in the Presence of a
Partial Education Subsidy, DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES, IZA DP
No. 10992, IZA Institute of Labor Economics, retrieved
from http://ftp.iza.org/dp10992.pdf.
Jensen, P., & Nielsen, H. S. (1997). Child Labour or School
Attendance? Evidence from Zambia. Journal of Population
Economics, 10(4).
Kim, J., & Zepeda, L. (2004). Factors Affecting Children's
Participation and Amount of Labor on Family Farms. Journal
of Safety Research, 35(4).
Lee, B. C., Jenkins, L. S., & Westaby, J. D. (1997). Factors
Influencing Exposure of Children to Major Hazards on
Family Farms. The Journal of Rural Health, 13(3).
Liening, A. "Growth Theory and Endogenous Human Capital
Development: A Contribution to the Theory of Complex
Systems," Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 3 No. 2,
2013, pp. 96-104. doi: 10.4236/tel.2013.32016.
68
Mukherjee, D. & Das, S. (2008). Role of Parental Education in
Schooling and Child Labour Decision: Urban India in the
Last Decade. Social Indicators Research, 89.
Nelson, G. L. M., & Quiton, J. D. (2017). Child Labor and Its
Effects on Schooling, Health and Recreation of Filipino
Children. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS],
26(1), 68-82. Retrieved from
https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/10
7375.
Pedraza, A. C., & Ribero, R. (2006). El trabajo infantil y
juvenil en Colombia y algunas de sus consecuencias claves.
Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y
Juventud., 4(1).
Philippine Statistics Authority, Final Results of the 2011
Survey on Children, Table 3,
https://psa.gov.ph/content/estimated-number-working-
children-5-17-years-old-who-worked-during-past-weekwas-33-
million.
Ravallion, M., & Wodon, Q. (2000). Does Child Labour Displace
Schooling? Evidence on Behavioural Responses to an
Enrollment Subsidy. The Economic Journal, 110(462), 158-
175.
Republic of the Philippines, RA No. 7568, An Act Prohibiting
the Employment of Children Below 15 Years of Age in Public
and Private Undertakings.
Rogers, Carol Ann & Swinnerton, Kenneth A. (2002) A Theory of
Exploitative Child Labor, retrieved from
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6589454.pdf
Rosati, F. C., & Rossi, M. (2003). Children's Working Hours
and School Enrollment: Evidence from Pakistan and
Nicaragua. The World Bank Economic Review, 17(2).
Understanding Children's Work. Forthcoming. "Understanding
Children's Work and Youth Employment Outcomes in the
Philippines."
U.S. Department of Labor. 2016. “Philippines: 2015 Findings on
the Worst Forms of Labor: Significant Advancement.”
Webbink, E., Smits, Jeroen, de Jong, E. (2011). Household and
Context Determinants of Child Labour in 221 Districs of 18
Developing Countries. Social Indicators Research, Online
First.
https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra1992/
ra_7610_1992.html.
69
Appendix A
Letter to the Dean
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Art and Communication
University of Eastern Philippines
University Town, Northern Samar
Madam:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
70
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN SAMAR.”
In connection with this, please allow us to conduct
a data gathering to the respondents.
Thank you so much.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
Noted:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
JOSE E. GABON, JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
Approved:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Arts and Communication
71
Appendix B
Letter to the Department Chair
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
JOSE E. GABON JR., DCJE
Officer In-charge
Criminology Department
College of Arts and Communication
Sir:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
72
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN”
We have constructed survey questionnaires to gather
data for this study.
In connection with this, we would like to ask
permission to conduct survey to gather the data needed in
this study. We are hoping that this request will be
granted and approved.
Thank you very much for your response.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
Recommending Approval:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
Approved:
JOSE E. GABON. JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
73
Appendix C
Letter to the Respondents
Republic of the Philippines
University of eastern Philippines
COLLEGE OF ARTS AND COMMUNICATION
University Town, Northern Samar
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
Date:
Dear Respondents:
The undersigned are Bachelor of Science in
Criminology senior students of the University of Eastern
Philippines, and are presently conducting a thesis
entitled: “CHILD LABOR PRACTICES IN BARANGAY BANGKEROHAN,
CATARMAN NORTHERN SAMAR.”
In line with this, please give us a little of your
time to conduct a data gathering regarding our study.
74
The researchers further assure you that all the data
gathered will be kept confidential and will only be used
for this study.
Thank you.
Respectfully yours,
CATHY M. CULA
ERIKA C. HERNANDEZ
Researchers
Noted:
JOY E. PRESADO, DPA, RCrim, LPT
Research Professor
JOY F. LORETO, MCJ
Research Adviser
Recommending Approval:
JOSE E. GABON, JR., DCJE
Chair, Criminology Department
Approved:
MARIA ALFE G. BANAWIS, DALL
Dean, College of Arts and Communication
75
Appendix D
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Name (Optional):
Part I. Socio-demographic characteristics
7. Age
8. Sex [ ] male [ ] female
9. Education
[ ] No education at all
[ ] Elementary level
[ ] Elementary graduate
[ ] High school level
[ ] High school graduate
[ ] Attends school regularly
[ ] Do not attend school regularly
10. Income from labor
[ ] Php 2,000.00 or below per month
[ ] Php 2,100-5,000.00 per month
[ ] Php 5,100 or more per month
76
11. Type of work employed
[ ] housekeeper [ ] fishing
[ ] quarry worker [ ] vending
[ ] construction worker [ ] PD Cab driver
[ ] farming
[ ] others, pls. specify
12. Years of work
[ ] less than 1 year
[ ] 1-3 years
[ ] 4 years or more
Part II. Child Labor Practices
Directions: Please check on the space provided your perception
about child labor practices based on the following scale:
Strongly agree Disagree
Moderately agree Strongly disagree
Agree
Practices Strongly Moderately Agree Disagree Strongly
agree agree disagree
16. I worked to
support for my family's
needs
17. I worked because
no one in the family is
able to provide for the
family
18. I worked all day
and night
19. I was forced to
work because my parents
cannot support my
studies
20. I worked as a
laborer because our
place had no existing
school
21. I worked because
77
I want to buy my
personal needs
22. I worked because
there are job
opportunities available
in our place
23. I worked because
my parents want me to
become responsible when
I grow up
24. I worked because
I was influenced by my
friends who are also
into child labor
25. I do hard labor
in a day
26. I work because no
one supports me
27. Child labor is a
way of life in our
place
28. Working allows me
to be physically fit
29. Working allows me
to be mentally fit
30. As a child
worker, I can
contribute to the
economy of our locality
Part III. Causes of Child Labor
Directions Please check the causes and reasons why you engaged
in child labor?
( ) Family beliefs and practices
( ) Sickness of parents or other members of the family
( ) Lack of support and encouragement from family
( ) Violence inside the home
( ) Lack of jobs, employment or insufficient salary of the
parents
( ) No regular income
( ) Lack of assets and properties such as land, animals, that
maybe a source of income during emergency situations
( ) Lack or insufficient social services
( ) Violence and other conflicts in the community
( ) Influence of vices in the community (smoking, drugs,
gambling)
78
( ) Lack of social protection
( ) Limited access to education
( ) Weak enforcement of local laws
( ) Others pls. specify
Part IV. Effects of Child Labor
( ) Hard to continue with schooling because of exhausted from
work and cannot concentrate on the lesson
( ) Find it hard to focus on tasks assigned
( ) Afraid to mingle and make friends
( ) Losses their respect to parents
( ) Thin, sickly and stunted height and overall growth
( ) Skin disease due to exposure to chemicals
( ) Lung problems due to exposure to fumes in the workplace
( ) Hunchbacked due to lifting of heavy objects at work
( ) Low self esteem
( ) Arrogant because of the money earned from working
( ) Irritable because of fatigue from work
( ) They can only get low paying and unskilled jobs
( ) Minimal opportunity to remove oneself from poverty due to
lack of skills, sickness, sickliness, and low level of
education
( ) Others pls. specify
Thank you!
79
Appendix D
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Ngaran (Opsyunal):
Una na Parti. Pangkalugaringon
Edad
6. Kinatawhan [ ] lalaki [ ] babaye
7. Edukasyon
[ ] waray iniskwelahan
[ ] abot la elementary an iniskwelahan
[ ] nakatangpos sa elementary
[ ] abot la hayskul an iniskwelahan
[ ] nakatangpos sa hayskul
[ ] nasulod pa permi sa eskwelahan
[ ] danay nala nasulod sa eskwelahan
8. Sweldo san pagtrabaho
80
[ ] Php 2,000.00 o paubos pa kada bulan
[ ] Php 2,100-5,000.00 kada bulan
[ ] Php 5,100 o mas dako pa kada bulan
9. Klase san ginsudlan na trabaho
[ ] kabulig sa sulod sa panimalay [ ] panagat
[ ] manbabaras [ ] paragbaligya
[ ] konstruksyon worker o pagtukod [ ] PD Cab
drayber
[ ] pag-uma
[ ] an iba, alayon pakibutang
10. Tuig san pagtrabaho
[ ] ubos pa sa sayu katuig
[ ] 1-3 katuig
[ ] 4 katuig o lahos pa
Ikaduwa nga Parti. Child labor practices
Direksyun: Alayun paki tsek san espasyo basis a iyo pagkasabot
sine nga tag batan-on nga trabahador:
Pag-uyon kusog Dire pag-uyon
Tama la nga pag-uyon Dire gud pag-uyon
Pag-uyon
Practices Pag-uyon Tama la Pag- Dire Dire gud
kusog nga pag- uyon pag-uyon pag-uyon
uyon
16. Nagtrabaho ak
para suportahan an
pangihalangnon saak
pamilya.
17. Nagtrabaho ak
tungod sa rason nga
wara bisan sayo an
makahatag saak
kinahanglanon sa akon
ak pamilya
18. Nagtratrabaho ak
bug-os na adlaw ngan
81
gabe
19. Napiritan ak
magtrabaho tungod sa
dire kaya saak pamilya
suportahan ak pag
eskwela
20. Nagtratrabago ak
bilang sayo na
trabahador tungod sa
wara saam eskwelan
21. Nagtratrabaho ak
para makapalit saak
kalugaringon na
pangihanglanon
22. Nagtratrabaho ak
kay tungod nga may
puydi masudlan na
trabaho
23. Nagtratrabaho ak
kay tungod sa karuyag
saak kag anak nga
maging responsibilidad
ak pagdako
24. Nagtratrabaho ak
kay tungod nga
naimpluwensyahan ak
saak kasangkayan nga
batan-on pa nga
nananrabaho na
25. Mabug-at na trabahuon
ak inhihimo sa sayo
kaadlaw
26. Nagtratrabaho ak kay
tungod sa wara saak
nasuporta
27. An pagigin batan-on nga
trabahador an pamaagi
san pangabuhi saam lugar
28. An pagtratrabaho an
nakakahatag saak libsog
nga pangalawason
29. An pagtratrabaho an
naghahatag saak maupay
nga pangisipan
30. Bilang sayo nga batan-
on nga trabahador,
makakaamot naak gihapon
sa ekonomiya san aton
lokalidad.
Ikatulo na Parti. Causes of child labor
82
Direksyun: Alayon paki tsek san rason kay nano na nahibutang
kamo sa pagigin batan-on nga trabahador.
( ) Tinuohan ngan buruhaton san pamilya
( ) Pagkasakit sa kag-anak o sa iba nga membro sa pamilya
( ) Kulang sa suporta ngan pagpakaupay san pamilya
( ) Kapintasan sa sulod sa panimalay
( ) Kawara san trabaho o dire sakto ngan kulang na sweldo san
kag-anak
( ) Wara permanente na kita
( ) Kakulangan san mga kabtanan sugad san tuna, kahayopan nga
puydi pagkuwaan san panahon sa pagkuri ngan
pangahilangnon
( ) Kakulangan san serbisyo sa pangkatawhan
( ) Kapintasan ngan iba pa nga saramok sa komunidad
( ) Impluwensya san pagbisyo sugad san pagpansigarilyo, droga
ngan paghuygo
( ) Kakulangan proteksyon sa pangkatawhan
( ) Limitado nga akses sa edukasyon
( ) Maluya ngan pagpatuman san local nga mga balaod
( ) An iba, alayun pakibutang ________________
Ikaupat na Parti. Effects of child labor
( ) Kakurian san pagpadayon san pag-aram tungod san katanglay
sa trabaho ngan dire makaatinder sa mga leksyon
( ) Nakukurian maka pokus sa mga ginhatag na hirimuon
( ) Hadok makihalobilo ngan makisangkay
( ) Pagkawara respito o pagtahod sa kag-anak
( ) MAhugos, sarakitnon ngan pagtuok sa kahataas tas pagtubo
( ) Sakit sa panit tungod sa pagka-ekspos sa kemikalSS
( ) Problema sa baga tungod sa pagka-ekspos alisngaw sa
gintratrabahuan
( ) Pagkakubaog tungod sa pag-alsa magbug-at
83
( ) Hamubo nga pag-imod sa pangkalugaringon
( ) Pagkahambog tungod sa may kwarta pagtrinabaho
( ) Pagkauyam tungod sa kapagal sa trabaho
( ) Pagkakuha dito nga kantidad san sweldo ngan dire
pagkahasa sa trabaho
( ) Ditoy na higayon nga makatalwas sa kakurian tungod sa
tungod sa kakulang sa kahasa, sakiton ngan dito nga
inadman
( ) An iba, alayon pakibutang
Salamat!