Sop LPPT
Sop LPPT
LPPT
8 Jan 2023
0.0
Contents
1 General 5
1.1 Distribution and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.2 Airport Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.3 Runways and Declared Distances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.4 Radio Navigation Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.5 Landing Aids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.6 Approach Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.1 Intrument Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.6.2 Visual Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.7 Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.8 Preferential Runway Configuration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.8.1 Runway Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
1.9 Transition Altitude and Transition Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.10 Positions and Responsibilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.10.1 Lisboa Airport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.10.2 Adjacent Positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
1.11 Transfers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.12 Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
1.13 Flight Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.13.1 VFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.13.2 IFR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
1.14 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2 Delivery (DEL) 22
2.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.3.1 Flight Plan validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.3.2 A-CDM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.3.3 IFR Departure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.4 VFR Departure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.5 DCL Clearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.4 Phraseology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.4.1 IFR Departure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.4.2 VFR Departure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3 Ground (GND) 29
3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.1 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.3.1.1 Runway crossing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.4 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.5 Stand assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.6 Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.1 Taxiways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2 Aprons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2.1 APRON 70 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2.2 APRON 14 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2.3 APRON 60 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2.4 APRON 50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3.6.2.5 APRON 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.6.3 Engine run-ups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.7 Phraseology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.7.1 Startup request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.7.2 Push and start request . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.7.3 Taxi out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.7.4 Taxi in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.7.5 Departure handoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
4 Tower (TWR) 39
4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.2 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.3 Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.3.1 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
4.3.2 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.3.3 Go arounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.3.4 Reduced Runway Separation Minima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.4 VFR Helicopters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.4.1 Heliports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.4.1.1 ALFRAGIDE LPAF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.4.1.2 ALGÉS LPJB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.4.1.3 ALMADA HOSP LPGO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.4 AMADORA HOSP LPAS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.5 CARNAXIDE HOSP LPFX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.6 SALEMAS LPSA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.7 LISBOA STA MARIA HOSP LPSM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.8 ACADEMIA MILITAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.4.1.9 HOSPITAL FORÇA AÉREA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
4.4.2 Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
4.5 Phraseology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.5.1 Take-off Clearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.5.2 Landing Clearance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.5.3 Lineup behind . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.5.4 RRSM landing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
5 Approach 55
5.1 Area of Responsibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
5.2 Departures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
5.3 SID Deviations/Directs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
5.4 Arrivals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.1 Initial contact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.2 Delays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.3 Approach Sequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.4 Approach Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.5 Arrival Sector . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
5.4.6 Speed Restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
5.5 Cascais Aerodrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
5.6 Alverca Aerodrome . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
SOP LPPT P5
Chapter 1
General
The procedures laid here are of mandatory use while controlling on the Network and shall never be
adopted for real world use.
ICAO LPPT
IATA LIS
RWY Total M5 N2 P S4 U5
Departures from intersections not listed above are not allowed, except for helicopters.
02
20
Should a pilot request another type of instrument approach it should be accommodated, as no significant
impact is expected. In Euroscope, assign the corresponding STAR+APP or only APP in the STAR field of
the Sector List. No further coordination is required.
[CALLSIGN], CLEARED VISUAL APPROACH RUNWAY 02, DO NOT DESCEND BELOW 2500 FEET
UNTIL ESTABLISHED ON FINAL.
In case of helicopter activity within Lisboa CTR West of the airfield, namely in the Salemas Route, restrict
descent to 3000ft.
Visual approaches should only be approved when the arrival sequence is assured to be maintained,
without negative impact for the aircraft downstream of the visual approach, and provided the traffic
requesting visual has the traffic ahead in sight.
Note Clearing a visual approach in practical terms hands off the control
of when the aircraft turns base to the pilots, thus removing the
controller’s ability to fine tune the arrival sequence by shortening
or lengthening the downwind vector. This is the main reason why
visual approaches are only feasible during periods of lesser traffic.
1.7 Holdings
In case of calm or cross winds, refer to the weather forecast to determine which runway to use and avoid
unnecessary runway changes.
Try to plan ahead as much as possible to avoid a runway change in a period of high traffic. Weather
forecasts and tools to see VATSIM traffic are a good help.
Together decide who will be the last departure and the last arrival. All subsequent traffic will be
cleared/recleared to the new runway, holding at the stand if necessary.
QNH From 942.2 From 959.5 From 977.2 From 995.1 From From 1031.7
to 959.4 to 977.1 to 995.0 to 1013.2 1013.3 to 1050.3
to 1031.6
TL 70 65 60 55 50 45
DELLI LPPT_DEL Lisboa Delivery 118.950 Check Flight Plans; Issue ATC Clear-
ances; Manage Departure Sequence
CTRLI LPPT_TWR Lisboa Tower 118.100 Lisboa CTR; RWY02/20; RWY crossings
1
To be used with prior coordination with LPPT_APP and provided that LPPT_U_APP is online
2
To be used with prior coordination with LPPT_APP
1.11 Transfers
From To Conditions/Remarks
GND TWR Approaching runway holding point or point to cross the RWY
TWR APP Automatic handoff at 1000’. Give a firm goodbye to increase chances
of pilot switching to APP frequency automatically
The table above defines the transfers for config 1 below. For other airspace configurations, refer to the
image below:
• 5Nm
Additionally, perform a sanity check based on good sense. For example, checking half the route is
missing from the flight, a flight from Europe to North America does not route through the South Atlantic,
etc.
If the filled route is not acceptable, but the controller is able to correct it without undue workload, correct it
and advise the pilot via private message of the new route.
If the filled route is not acceptable to the point the controller does not have the ability to correct it or
provide a valid one, inform the pilot via private message and request the pilot to refile.
Note In some circumstances the pilot may report that a new flight plan
was filled, but it does not show to the controller. This is due to the
flight plan entering a locked state where the pilot can no longer
update it. Either request the new flight plan details via private
message, or request the pilot to reconnect to the network.
1.13.1 VFR
No requirements are in place for VFR fixed wing departures from LPPT.
VFR helicopters entering or leaving Lisboa CTR are to comply with published AIP VFR helicopter routes.
Traffic permitting, only two VFR flights will be simultaneously accepted concerning any activity in Lisboa
CTR, except for flights from/to LPPT.
Low altitude VFR Flights over Lisboa City, must maintain permanent two way radio communications with
ATC, and minimum altitude of 1500FT.
Pilots should be prepared to exit the area at any time or hold VFR over one of the following designated
points:
• Mata de Queluz - only for helicopters in stationary flight at an altitude of 1000FT and operating in
conditions of visibility equal or greater than 10KM and with clouds scattered at or above 3000FT
(conditions forecast to the next hour)
1.13.2 IFR
Departures must begin their route at a point associated with an SID.
Cruise < FL195 FL195 < Cruise < FL245 FL245 < Cruise
Lower airways and DCT (DCT max Higher airways and DCT (DCT DCT (no max distance)
300nm) max 300nm)
Domestic flights’ route must end at a point associated with a STAR or an Instrument Approach IAF (Initial
Approach Fix).
LECM flights must then route via airways, or DCT if leaving northbound via a point West of ADORO.
GMMM flights must then route via airways or DCT (max 75nm).
• RWY 20 in use:
• RWY 02 in use:
LVP in force shall be communicated to the pilot during the clearance or during the initial contact with APP
(ATIS URL should also be changed to inform about LVP - (...)lvp=true).
When implementing LVP, set A-CDM departure rate by typing .cdm lvo on on the EuroScope
command line.
To return to NVP, set A-CDM departure rate by typing .cdm lvo off on the EuroScope command line.
Ground Radar LVP Status shall be toggled to LVP when LVP are implemented, and NORMAL when LVP
are suspended.
Holding position of the runway will be the CAT II/III holding point
Do not issue conditional clearances relying on visual references (when clear of traffic, P/S approved,
behind landing traffic, line up and wait behind, etc.).
Do not issue conflicting taxi clearances. Issue shorter taxi clearances that do not intersect other taxi
clearances. Progressively issue new clearances until reaching the CAT II/III holding point.
Wait until the preceding traffic has vacated the taxi segment before issuing a new clearance using it.
As we are unable to light up stop bars, separate traffic on the ground by issuing holding clearances at
various taxiways (max. 1 traffic per taxiway segment/holding).
Issue landing clearances no later than 2NM final and only if the ILS sensitive area is clear.
Inform about RVR during takeoff, landing and continue approach clearances.
Chapter 2
Delivery (DEL)
2.1 General
Lisboa Delivery is responsible for validating new flight plans from LPPT, issuing enroute clearances and
takes part in managing and enforcing the departure sequence.
Lisboa Delivery will provide departure information and enroute clearance. Departure information shall
consist of ATIS letter and QNH (when ATIS is inoperative, provide departure runway, wind and QNH, in
this order). Enroute clearance shall consist of the clearance limit, assigned SID and assigned squawk
code. Clearance limit shall always be the destination aerodrome.
Additionally, it will task the administrative roles of validating flight plans, creating the departure sequence
and calculating departure delays when needed.
Lisboa Delivery will keep departures until the aircraft reports ready, or TSAT window, whichever comes
later, at which point it will handoff the aircraft to Lisboa Ground.
Lisboa Delivery, as the lowest position of LPPT, is responsible for hosting DCL, ATIS and CDM Master.
2.3 Procedures
The below procedures are considered as standard and no coordination is required to employ them,
except where explicitly required.
Should a situation arise that does not match any of the below cases, coordinate an arrangement with the
affected agencies.
• Navigation equipment code letter present in accordance with VATSIM internal equipment list. Add
or correct if needed
2.3.2 A-CDM
TSAT is automatically handled by the CDM plugin.
When connecting to the network, it is required for one, and only one, controller to be the CDM Master,
the one who hosts the CDM. Other positions are Slaved to the Master.
When connecting to the network, to become CDM Master, input .cdm master lppt in the EuroScope
command line.
To disconnect and handoff the master to another controller, the leaving controller inputs .cdm slave
lppt in the EuroScope command line. Then, the new host can input .cdm master lppt on their
command line.
CDM calculations become available 35 minutes before the flight plan EOBT. TOBT is assumed to be
equal to EOBT.
TSAT can be transmitted to the flight after the correct readback of the enroute clearance, or at latest
when the flight reports ready, if there’s any delay.
Start up or pushback clearance can only be issued within the TSAT window, +/- 5 minutes of the TSAT.
Flights before the window should have a Ready Message sent, and only if the subsequent TSAT is
updated to be within the window shall startup or pushback be approved.
Flights that have missed the window shall have their TOBT updated to a new time by the controller.
Workload permitting, the flight can be asked to provide an estimate of when it will be ready, and the TOBT
updated accordingly.
For more information on the CDM Plugin, refer to the TOPLIS Manual.
Assign an RNAV SID to RNAV capable aircraft. Assign FTM or ESP SID to non-RNAV capable aircraft.
Flights exiting LPPC FIR via TOSDI (RIVRO) assign IXIDA departure.
Flights exiting LPPC FIR via UREDI/OGERO(above FL245) or PORTA/PORLI (below FL245), assign:
Other cases assign SID according to the closest Lisboa TMA exit point.
If the pilot cannot accept any SID, coordinate with Lisboa Approach. Expect to assign runway heading
and FL60.
At receipt of a VFR departure Flight Plan, or at latest at startup request, coordinate departure instructions
with Lisboa Tower.
Do not issue startup clearance without successfully coordinating with Lisboa Tower.
If the pilot does not reply within 3 minutes, the clearance will timeout automatically and you should revert
to voice procedures
For more information on the DCL functions, refer to the TOPLIS Manual.
2.4 Phraseology
2.4.1 IFR Departure
ATC Aircraft
[readback]
OR
Note In Lisboa, when issuing a clearance with a SID, the initial climb
clearance is omitted
ATC Aircraft
[ clearance request]
OR
Note VFR traffic will typically be smaller aircraft that might need to start
their engines right away. Be ready to transmit the clearance at a
later stage, such as just before or during taxi
Chapter 3
Ground (GND)
3.1 General
For the standard taxi routes, refer to the AIP.
The transponder must be ON at the latest before issuing take off clearance during NVP, or before taxi
clearance during LVP.
Departures have priority over arrivals regarding taxi/pushback. Sometimes it can be better to give priority
to the arrival to ease traffic flow.
Lisboa Ground will take departures from pushback or startup clearance until reaching the departure
holding point, and arrivals from exiting the Rapid Exit Taxiway until reaching the stand. It will additionally
be responsible for any movements such as aircraft towing or taxiing to other positions, run-ups, etc.
3.3 Procedures
The below procedures are considered as standard and no coordination is required to employ them,
except where explicitly required.
Should a situation arise that does not match any of the below cases, coordinate an arrangement with the
affected agencies.
3.3.1 Departures
When RWY02 in use, ACFT taxiing via G2, U1 and N1 are to be assigned position N for departure. For
ACFT taxiing via M4 assign position M for departure. Position P is available if the pilot requests it and
Tower is able to accommodate the request (in these cases assign TAXI SP in the STS of the Departure
List). Departures from stands 124, 125 and 126 should push facing north to taxi via G. Stands 123 and
further south should push facing south and taxi via M. Some flexibility is allowed regarding direction
facing in apron 12x when an operational advantage exists to push in the other direction.
When RWY20 in use, medium and light ACFT are to be assigned position U for departure, unless the
pilot requests full rwy length (in these cases assign TAXI SP in the STS of the Departure List). Heavies
will go for S.
Prior to the aircraft reaching the holding point, Ground will handoff the aircraft to Tower with a CONTACT
if the holding point is empty, or with a STAND BY FOR otherwise.
3.4 Arrivals
If RWY02 is in use, arrivals will vacate via H4. Tower will instruct to vacate via H4 and U4 prior to
transferring to Ground.
In case of RWY20, arrivals will vacate via H1 or H3. Tower will instruct to continue either via L, G, U or F
according to the assigned stand.
Destination Apron 40, 41, 42, 20, 22, 10, 11, 12 will continue via L.
Destination Apron 50, 60, 12, 14, 70, 80, Mil Apron will continue via G (or F if proceeding to stands
connected to Taxilane F).
Stand 124 will be used as the cutaway point in deciding whether to taxi via G or via L. Stand 124, inclusive,
to the north will be instructed to continue via G. Stand 123, inclusive, to the south will be instructed to
continue via L.
If taxiway L or G is blocked by a pushback (coordinate with GND and look at the ground radar), Tower will
instruct to continue via the other taxiway, or if both are blocked, via U. Tower may attempt to coordinate
an arrival vacating via A6 or T. Main consideration to approve these requests is:
• RWY 02: A conflict hazard between an aircraft vacating via H4 and another via A6 at the intersection
of taxiway A with U, or if you anticipate that this will increase the runway occupancy time, when
that is a factor
• RWY 20: A head on conflict between an aircraft vacating via T or A and another taxiing to the
runway via T or A
Jetway stands are typically used by Flag Carriers and easyJet. Stand 108 is mostly used by ATR aircraft.
All other stands are remote and can be given to both Schengen and Non-Schengen flights.
Apron 20 is for low cost companies (except easyJet), and occasionally Cargo aircraft.
Apron 22 is used both by all types of traffic, ranging from Low Costs to Flag Carriers, including Business
Jets and diverted Single Engine Pistons.
Apron 70 is used by Embraer, ATR aircraft, Business Jets, private aircraft and helicopters.
Apron 80 is the main option for Cargo aircraft, but is also used as a normal remote apron. Care should
be taken to respect the wingspan limitations of the apron. Stands 801 to 803 are limited to aircraft B763
and smaller. Stands 804 to 806 are limited to A321 and smaller. MD11 and larger do not fit anywhere in
the apron, and should be assigned a remote stand elsewhere.
Military Apron is used by State and Military aircraft, emergency helicopters, and exceptionally Business
Jets when parking elsewhere is not possible.
If the pilot requests another stand check stand availability and compatibility with aircraft type. If no
problems are found, assign the requested stand. If you find a problem, inform the pilot and suggest
another stand nearby.
3.6 Restrictions
The push-back/start-up procedure has to be initiated no later than 2:00 minutes after the start-up approval
has been issued.
3.6.1 Taxiways
G2 turning right into U2 forbidden for Heavy aircraft.
Aircraft taxiing northbound on TWY S2 forbidden to turn right and enter TWY U6.
Taxilanes A1, A2, M1, K and Y restricted to aircraft wingspan up to 48 meters (B752 max).
3.6.2 Aprons
3.6.2.1 APRON 70
On 701, 702, and 703 positions (nose out) aircraft will enter through taxiway A5 and depart through
Taxilane D and via Taxilane W1.
On position 704, 705 and 706 (nose-in) the aircraft will enter by Taxilane W1 and Taxilane D. The
departing maneuver will be done with push-back and pull-ahead to the breakaway zone of Taxilane D
with the nose facing South.
3.6.2.2 APRON 14
Aircraft pushing back from Stand 146 shall be pushed along the full length of the Stand maintain alignment
with the lead-in line of the Stand until reaching TWY A5 and Taxilane W1 intersection. From here a
Pull-ahead manoeuvre shall be executed placing the aircraft over A4 TWY centreline.
3.6.2.3 APRON 60
Apron Taxilane F restricted to aircraft with wingspan maximum 36M (A320 family). Larger aircraft shall
use TWY G2 for taxi.
3.6.2.4 APRON 50
When B744 aircraft and larger are parked on this Apron, they should always enter and exit through
Taxiway M2.
3.6.2.5 APRON 30
Normal Visibility Operations (NVO) Traffic for all Runways:
• From Stand 301 the push-back manoeuvre must be nose faced South
• From Stand 302 the push-back manoeuvre must be nose faced North
• On Multipurpose Ramp
3.7 Phraseology
3.7.1 Startup request
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
3.7.4 Taxi in
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
Chapter 4
Tower (TWR)
4.1 General
In a constant flow of traffic, the normal sequence will be a departure, a landing, a departure, a landing
and so on. Tower will be the final element to tweak the departure sequence and will work on a more
immediate time frame, compared to the more tactical time frame of Delivery for example.
Lisboa CTR is neighboured by Cascais CTR to the Southwest, Sintra MCTR and MCTA to the West,
Alverca MCTR to the Northeast and Montijo MCTR to the Southeast.
Lisboa Approach sits on top of Lisboa CTR, starting at 1000ft within 9NM of LPPT, and 1500ft beyond
9NM
4.3 Procedures
4.3.1 Departures
Ground shall initiate transfer of communications to Tower with sufficient time to allow rerouting the
departure to a different holding point, should there be a benefit in doing so.
Note Typical situations where this may happen include a departure not
ready at the holding point with a second departure ready, a Medium
aircraft departing ahead of a Heavy aircraft to prevent applying
Wake Turbulence Separation, a departure with more accumulated
delay overtaking another with less, among others. In the end, apply
good sense in fine tuning the departure sequence
Consider every aircraft at the runway holding point as able to commence line-up and take-off roll
immediately after clearance is issued.
Issue line up clearance only when the departure is near the holding point and the arrival is at 6DME or
greater from the threshold.
Make good use of “Behind TFC on final/landing runway 02, via XX lineup and wait behind” Keep in
mind some pilots, especially text ones, will be slower than others complying with clearances, particularly,
starting the takeoff run. Plan ahead to avoid go arounds.
A smaller separation (1:00 to 1:30 min) can be coordinated with Approach and Arrival in case of no
arrivals.
Do not coordinate this with traffic to LPMA. Always observe ICAO Wake Turbulence Separation Minima
and apply it, if greater.
For the purposes of Wake Turbulence Separation Minima, position M and N are the same and no additional
separation is required. Position P and U is considered an intersection departure, and separation shall be
increased to 3:00 minutes for aircrafts of a lighter category than the previous full length departure.
If there is any communication to be made that requires a readback, such as a modification of departure
clearance, do not issue take-off clearance without the correct readback.
If there is VFR traffic present in the Lisboa CTR near the departure path, and weather conditions are
sufficient to keep both aircraft in sight, first instruct the VFR to not interfere with the departure path, and
instruct the departure to remain on Tower frequency.
During the departure observe that there will be no conflict, and give traffic information as appropriate.
Wait until the departure has cleared the VFR traffic by at least 1000ft and then initiate the handoff to
Approach.
VFR can be deconflicted from departures and arrivals by instructing to remain clear of the Runway
Extended Centerline, or by instructing to not interfere with departures/arrivals, as appropriate.
4.3.2 Arrivals
Remember you can issue speed restrictions for traffic on ILS, but avoid asking them to reduce to minimum
approach speed too early, unless necessary.
If you feel that the separation on final is too short, inform the APP controller and ask for a bigger
separation.
After the arrival has decelerated close to taxi speed, instruct to vacate via the Rapid Exit Taxiway and an
ensuing taxiway, and order to contact Ground. See Ground Arrivals to determine the ensuing taxiway
Arrivals may request to vacate via taxiway A6 or T on initial contact with Tower. Coordinate with Ground
and if successful, after the arrival has decelerated close to taxi speed instruct to vacate via the taxiway
requested. If not, instruct to vacate via the Rapid Exit Taxiway.
4.3.3 Go arounds
In case of a go around, the published missed approach is the following:
Inform Approach and transfer the aircraft to 119.1 (LPPT_APP). Failure to do so may result in the loss of
separation between aircraft on the missed approach and the aircraft on the SID.
Do not modify the procedure right away for the following reasons:
• Changing the cleared altitude may conflict with the departures and/or arrivals
Do not forget to apply wake turbulence separation between the missed approach and ensuing departing
aircraft.
• Ground visibility is at least 5 KM and the ceiling is not less than 1000 FT;
• Runway is dry;
• The arriving aircraft receives traffic information as follows: (call sign) traffic information, (Aircraft
Type) departing Runway (Designator).
• When the arrival crosses the threshold, the following distances will exist:
• Following phraseology is used: (call sign) after the departing (Aircraft Type) cleared to land Runway
(Designator).
The above mentioned distances are about 1.3NM. If the distance between the arrival and the departure
approaches or reduces below it, instruct a go-around before the arrival crosses the runway threshold.
An effort should be made to clear SAR and Hospital flights as direct and expeditiously as possible to
minimize their delays.
Hospital and Medical Evacuation Flights departures are typically cleared direct to the first point of the
flight plan route and climb to the requested altitude, pending successful coordination with Approach.
VFR Helicopter Routes are published in AIP and VFR Manual, and are to be enforced on non-priority
flights entering, leaving or crossing Lisboa CTR. VFR Helicopter Routes do not interfere with traffic on
Instrument Approaches or Departures to Lisboa.
Local VFR is not obliged to fly the published routes, and sometimes are even unable, such is the case of
sightseeing helicopter tours operating out of Algés.
In the 25 de Abril Bridge area, north of TR Helicopter Route, climbing up to 500ft maximum over the river
will not interfere with LPPT 02 arrivals or 20 departures.
Departures shall be cleared to turn to Igreja das Galinheiras 1500ft or RALIS 1000ft, for Visual Salemas
Route or Visual Tejo Route accordingly.
Take off will be issued from the intersection of taxiway T with runway 02/20.
Arrivals shall follow VFR Helicopter Routes to Igreja das Galinheiras or RALIS, at which point they will
hold and await clearance to continue.
When appropriate, clear to land on taxiway T intersection with runway 02/20. Helicopters unable do so
shall be cleared to land on runway 02/20.
VFR helicopters intending to overfly and cross the airport shall proceed to Igreja das Galinheiras or RALIS,
where they will wait for further clearance to continue to RALIS or Igreja das Galinheiras accordingly.
On the ground, instruct taxi via W and D to Apron D, or W and C to Military Apron for Military and Hospital
flights.
4.4.1 Heliports
Helicopters on the ground at the various Heliports inside Lisboa CTR may be unable to contact Tower
due to VHF propagation characteristics and will arrange alternative methods to contact Tower such as
via private message to obtain departure clearance or to report on the ground after arrival.
Instruct to remain clear of extended runway centerline for simultaneous operations with runway 02/20 at
LPPT.
Clear to exit the Lisboa CTR via a point belonging to one of the Helicopter VFR routes
Instruct to remain clear of extended runway centerline for simultaneous operations with runway 02/20 at
LPPT.
Request to report final.
Instruct to remain clear of extended runway centerline for simultaneous operations with runway 02/20 at
LPPT.
Request to report final.
The heliport lies underneath the extended runway centerline which makes it incompatible with
simultaneous operation of runway 02/20 at LPPT.
During runway 02 operation, coordinate with Lisboa Approach to halt arrivals approximately 2 minutes
before the helicopter arrives at the heliport. Use radar data to assess this. Resume arrivals after the
helicopter reports or is observed on the ground.
During runway 20 operation, coordinate with Lisboa Approach to halt arrivals and departures
approximately 2 minutes before the helicopter arrives at the heliport. Use radar data to assess this.
Resume arrivals and departures after the helicopter reports or is observed on the ground.
Request arrivals to report final. When reporting final, instruct to report on the ground, and to report again
before departure.
Request arrivals to report final. When reporting final, instruct to report on the ground, and to report again
before departure.
Request arrivals to report final. When reporting final, instruct to report on the ground, and to report again
before departure.
4.5 Phraseology
4.5.1 Take-off Clearance
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
[readback]
ATC Aircraft
Note Should there be any doubt that the departure has the correct arrival
in sight, give traffic information and confirm if the departure has
traffic in sight
ATC Aircraft
[readback]
ATC Aircraft
[callsign] [modification]
[readback]
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
[callsign], [location]
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
ATC Aircraft
Chapter 5
Approach
5.2 Departures
Initial climb will be FL060 or cruise altitude, if lower.
Issue climb as needed, until FL240 or cruise altitude, whichever is lower and handle the aircraft to the
CTR controller before he reaches FL240, in order to aim for a continuous climb, or when approaching the
lateral limits.
Before issuing the standard FL240, check the cruise altitude, it can be lower. Remember you can cancel
speed restrictions. Useful if you want to increase separation.
We have tried to include as much as possible the correct Euroscope next controller on the sector file.
However, due to some Euroscope limitations, it does not always suggest the next correct controller.
Should this happen, departures from LPPT to the W or SW will go to LPPC_W_CTR, even if Euroscope
suggests LPPC_E_CTR (this is simplified, we can have more sectors but the idea remains the same).
5.4 Arrivals
5.4.1 Initial contact
On first contact with APP, planes are to report callsign, cleared LVL and STAR, which should have already
been assigned by enroute controller. In the absence of an enroute sector, assign the STAR yourself.
5.4.2 Delays
If possible, delays should be accomplished by assigning speed restrictions. If needed, coordinate with
the Area Sector to issue speed restrictions when the traffic is still far away from Lisboa.
If speed restrictions are not enough, delay vectors can be used to increase the delay of one or two
arrivals. More than that and you should revert to holding.
Start assigning holds and coordinate with the adjacent controllers. It is of extremely importance to be
aware of the sequence and to still be capable of sequencing aircraft with the appropriate separation.
If holdings are needed or in progress, coordinate with the Arrival controller lower handoff altitudes to
ease arrival workload.
• 6nm
Default to 6nm (12nm during LVP), as Tower expects to depart one aircraft in between each arrival.
Separations less than 6nm sometimes do not work in VATSIM, and should only be used when confident
of a positive outcome.
• 8nm at 2500 feet (intersection of extended centerline with Lisboa CTR, for RWY02)
Maintain downwind/STAR until able to vector base turn to slot in sequence. If arrivals need long delaying
vectors, request LPPT_APP to begin issuing holds. Do not allow the situation to develop to the point
where delaying vectors begin nearing the lateral limits of the Radar Vectoring Area.
• Avoids having pilots reducing to minimum approach speed far away from the airport
Phase Speed
In case lower speeds are required, the following table presents minimum speeds possible to be assigned:
FL250 250kts
FL60 180kts
• If RWY in use at LPPT is 02, LPPT_F_APP is responsible for the VFR tunnels
• If RWY in use at LPPT is 20, LPPT_APP is responsible for the VFR tunnels
IFR inbounds are to be cleared for the RNP approach, or in alternative the VOR DME approach, RWY
35, with a circle to land RWY 17 if necessary.
IFR Inbounds:
– DCT ROKAP
– DCT FTM->CAS with Monte Real Active
– DCT ESP
• Followed by:
Traffic departing Alverca will be instructed to intercept the appropriate SID from LPPT.
Until LPAR_TWR is implemented, consider the following:
Appendix A