SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Written and compiled by
Ir. Tan Yoke Lee
MIEM, Mi-FIRE-E
yokeleetan71@gmail.com
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Plugholing is the phenomena whereby fresh air is being pulled into the exhaust inlet for systems in
which the “headroom” for accumulation of smoke above the highest egress route is minimal. This
“plugholing” of the exhaust inlet by the fresh air can decrease the efficiency of the smoke exhaust
system and can result in a deeper layer of smoke, to which occupants may be exposed (Figure 2).
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from article Smoke
management: Atriums and plugholes by Lougheed
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from British Standard 7346
part 4
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from Guide to Fire Protection
Malaysia
Similar to BS7346 for critical mass flow, using equation
where the ventilator is further from the wall than the
characteristic width of ventilator equation F.10
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from NFPA 92
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from NFPA 92
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
Treatment of plugholing is by limiting the amount of air that can be extracted from each exhaust inlet
and to place the inlet sufficiently far enough from each other. Extracted from NFPA 92
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
A comparison was made calculating the critical mass flow rate for plugholing.
Using NFPA92, a value of 6.7 kg/sec is obtained while using BS7436 a value of 9.16 kg/sec is obtained for flow through wall outlet.
This means a lot more ventilators are required in NFPA92 as compared to BS7346.
However, K=0.5 is used in NFPA calculation resulting in lower smoke temperature and To= 70deg F is used. In BS7346, K=1 for Ts
and To=92 deg F for summer time.
BS 7346
NFPA 92
SMOKE CONTROL -PLUGHOLING
POINTS FOR PONDERING
It is noted that in NFPA92, the minimum temperature rise of smoke above ambient is 4 deg F.
In BS 7346, design temperature of smoke layer shall not be less than 20 deg C above the ambient temperature
and if less than 50 deg C, the depth of the smoke layer, Y in table 2 shall be increased by 0.5m.
Here rise the question as to what is the minimum temperature of smoke above ambient for smoke control
engineering to work? This would need careful consideration and comparison to CFD calculations.
Also, it seems that for spill plume, the flow rate required is high if the opening width of the spill and balcony
projection is long. This would require lots of ventilators to avoid plugholing.