LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES

IN EDUCATION:
ISSUES AND TRENDS

Editors:
Cecilia Titiek Murniati
Ridwan Sanjaya
LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES IN EDUCATION:
ISSUES AND TRENDS
© Soegijapranata Catholic University 2017

ISBN:
978-602-6865-40-3

i
 Editors:
Cecilia Titiek Murniati
Ridwan Sanjaya

Setting layout:
Henry Ernanto

Publisher:
Soegijapranata Catholic University
Jl. Pawiyatan Luhur IV/1, Bendan Duwur
Semarang – Indonesia
Telp. +62448441555
Fax. +62248415429
Email: penerbitan@unika.ac.id

Soegijapranata Catholic University

Semarang - Indonesia
2017

ii
FOREWORD

Technology is changing our experiences. In education, the proliferation of

information and resources is provided through various gadgets and platforms.
Educational institutions invest millions of dollars to integrate technology in the
teaching and learning process to increase students’ engagement and improve
students’ achievement. While the actual impact of technology on learning
achievement has been inconclusive, it is commonly agreed that technology brings
about various benefits such as increased engagement, critical thinking, and
problem solving skills.
This book is a compilation of selected articles presented in International
Conference on Learning Technologies 2017. These articles focus on the ways
technology can be used to benefit students in their learning process. Some
articles highlight the role of e-learning while others discuss the issues of hybrid
learning and gamification in education. The contributors of these articles for
this book chapter shared their experiences, innovative and inspiring insights, and
their passions as well.

This book is a part of our research project funded by the Ministry of Research,
Technology, and Higher Education. It would not have been possible without the
support from the Ministry in the form of International Collaboration and
Publication Grant (Penelitian Kerjasama Luar Negeri). Our utmost gratitude goes
to Dr. Kristine Blair of Youngstown State University, our co-investigator in our
research project, who has been working diligently during our data collection and
analysis. We also thank the President of Youngstown State University who gave
his approval for the MOU so that our research project can be completed, the
former Rector of Soegijapranata Catholic University, Prof. Dr. Ir. Y. Budi
Widianarko, M.Sc., for his encouragement and support, the Dean of Faculty of
Language and Arts, Angelika Riyandari, PhD., and the Dean of Computer Science
Faculty, Erdhi Widyarto, ST., MT. for their approval and support. Last but not
least, we also like to thank colleagues, lecturers and ourstanding students who
have dedicated their time during the conference and the writing of this book.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD iii

METHODS AND APPROACHES

Modest approaches for learning and emerging technologies

impact on learning 1
Evans Ochola

The Role of Technology (Social Media) in Exploration Study

Lesson at Elementary School Teacher Education Program 18
Muhammad Arief Budiman

E-LEARNING

iii
 Evaluation of E-learning Activity Effectiveness in Higher
Education Through - Sentiment Analysis by Using Naïve Bayes
Classifier 28

Eka Angga Laksana, Ase Suryana, Ai Rosita, Heri Heryono

Starting an Online Class Exchange: Gains, Fails, and Future

39
Mikio Fuse

Socio-cultural perspectives of a Virtual Learning Environment

through Schoolbook: The De La Salle University - Dasmarinas,
Cavite 49

Luis Carmelo Buenaventura

Infrastructure Readiness and Human Resources in the

Implementation of E-learning 63
Albertus Yoga Widiantoro

Online Learners’ Motivation in Online Learning: The Effect of

Online - Participation, Social Presence, and Collaboration 72
Andree E. Widjaja and Jengchung Victor Chen
iv

Design and Proposal of Interactive Distance Learning Media in

Rural Area 94
Eko Hadi Gunawan, Ridi Ferdiana, Sri Suning Kusumawardani

Engaging Students in Open Distance Learning Environments

103
Ku Tuan Lonik

GAMIFICATION AND LEARNING

Increasing Student Online Sessions Engagement via
Gamification 118
Roland Lorenzo M. Ruben
Evaluation of ‘Prodigy’, an Online Educational Game-Based
Platform 130
Joseph Ma. Steven Cabalo, Rolando Panopio
 Group-based Game Making for Descriptive Writing
142
Andreas Setiawan

A VR-based Educational Game for Studying Mathematics

166
Brenda Chandrawati, Erdhi Widyarto

LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES FOR SPECIFIC DOMAINS

iPon: A Personal Finance Mobile Application Software that

Encourages Smart Money Management and Financial Skills
174
Juanito Doctor, Marivic Mitschek, Khadie Maecel Paliza,
Garlene Mariel Sabile, Jamille Tiong

Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’: Accounting-based Digital Learning in

Enhancing Teacher and Student Engagement 213
Sandy Arief, Jariyah
vi

v
METHODS AND APPROACHES
 Modest approaches for learning and emerging
technologies impact on learning
Evans Ochola

ABSTRACT
A key idea behind these new approaches and emerging technologies
model is that learning should be driven by a focus on students’
proficiency with specific aptitudes, and not by archaic school models.
Research on new approaches to learning and integration of
technology suggests that instructors and schools use new approaches
and technology to meet students need if (1) it supports already
existing, student-centered practices; (2) it is part of a systemic
initiative to implement student-centered learning; and (3) teachers
have access to professional development.

In particular, education has always lived in tension between two

functions. On the one hand education is a matter of assuring
continuity. On the other, it is a matter of developing creativity and
change that push learners into the unknown. Both of these functions
relate equally to knowledge. They both touch the essence of the
instruction/learning process. They are simultaneously
complementary and conflictive. Complimentary in that new
approaches to learning are made possible by emerging technologies
that consolidate policy and further advance instruction and learning.
The consensus among education reformers is that improving
instructional approaches and emerging technologies, together with
well-planned policy, are an important tool for realizing a new
paradigm of learner-centered education and content interaction that
better supports learners’ needs. Components such as providing
interactive content, giving immediate feedback, identifying
learners’ needs, and having student electronic portfolios are seen as
critical elements in learner-centered instruction. Conflictive in that,
some difficulties are encountered not only by instructors but also by
policy makers in the endeavor to adapt instructional changes to meet
students’ needs. The challenge to integrate new approaches and
technologies into education is enormous, but so are the possible

2 Methods and Approaches

 benefits. With educational technologies and new approaches, the sky
is not the limit. The limit is human imagination and societal
creativity.

INTRODUCTION
The rapid changes of today’s world present new challenges and put new demands
on the education system. Globally, there is a growing awareness of the necessity
to change and improve the preparation of learners in a continually changing
society. In this chapter, the focus is on new approaches and the infusion of
emerging technologies into the education system to create an impact on the
learning and instruction process. The education landscape is witnessing changes
in the way education is taught and in the way students learn. These approaches
with innovative methods are geared to enhance instruction and learning. These
methods undoubtedly influence the way instruction is presented and how
students learn. The approaches are generally applicable to any learning
environment. These approaches show positive learning effects for students under
widely varying conditions. Educators find the practices useful and valuable in
investigating the applicability of the new approaches and emerging technologies
in their particular circumstances. As with all educational practices, of course,
the new approaches can be conducted effectively or ineffectively planned, and
the results may vary in a rapidly evolving world.

Despite decades of research about uncovering the limited effectiveness of

traditional approaches of teaching, most instructors continue to teach the way
they were taught as learners. Most educators focus on the teaching, which
typically means conveying information. The research is clear. To educate today’s
learners to become citizens and professionals, they must be able to address
complex problems now and in the future; therefore, the primary focus for
educators must be learning.

In the book, Turning Learning Right Side Up: Putting Education Back on Track,
Ackoff and Greenberg (2008) emphasize that today’s education system is
imperfect. They posit, the objective of education to teach how to learn, problem
solve, and combine the old with the new is not just a desirable thing, but an
essential objective. To attain these results needed to be successful in modern
society, education must be authentic and engaging. Authentic in the sense that

Methods and Approaches 3

what the student is learning has meaning to the student as an individual, and as
a member of society and the world of work. Engaging in the sense that the
student is involved in the learning process and conquering the skills needed in
the world of work.

The world of work demands that all members of society have a minimum level of
basic understanding of modern economic, social, political, and technological
requirements. No country can afford not to expose its members to these
requirements. People without the ability to acquire essential knowledge and
skills will have unstable lives, and society will be deprived of their contributions.
Similarly, education must reflect equity concerns so that in times of educational
change, historical disparities by gender, region, or social grouping are addressed.
The prevailing challenge is to reach groups and individuals that are historically
underserved: females who face cultural and physical obstacles to educational
institutions; rural populations that are too thinly dispersed to populate; and
persons with disabilities. In these circumstances educators need to be innovative
and think outside the box. Innovation then becomes a continuum, with no marked
beginning and end, which provides new paradigms for lifelong learning to help
individuals, families, workplaces, and communities to adapt to societal and
economic relations.

CONVERGENT AND DIVERGENT APPROACHES

A combination of convergent and divergent instruction is essential. Offering
convergent and divergent approaches provide learners with the ability to find
their best way of learning. These approaches benefit each other. Convergent
instruction is where the instructor transmits the necessary information to the
students. This view is explored by Guilford, Green and Christensen (1950) who
described the convergent thinker as one who can be distinguished by the ability
to deal with problems requiring one conventional correct answer clearly
obtainable from the information provided. It is a way of thinking where the
learner draws on prior knowledge to answer the set of questions. This means
information is provided in a precise way, encouraging learning in a direct path.
Whereas, divergent instruction encourages the learner to take risks, learn how
to be flexible and to use imagination--a method of instruction where learners are
asked to produce as many answers to the problem as possible. This method is
very student-centered. Indeed, this type of learning and thinking is associated
directly with creative thinking (White, 1990) because of the amount of thinking
required to solve a problem in divergent ways. The learners are encouraged to

4 Methods and Approaches

explore different solutions. This approach encourages learners to be actively
engaged in the learning process since it requires the learner to produce detailed
answers. The tendency in the education system of today is toward the convergent
approach. There is a strong emphasis on setting convergent goals, an example of
standardized testing which is universally viewed as the best way to determine
the success or failure of the instruction and learning process. Other means of
evaluation which are more complicated and more demanding in terms of
application and interpretation, has been neglected.

There is a need for both convergent and divergent approaches to teaching and
learning. The increasing formalization and technological sophistication of
modern economies requires educators to meet the demands the education
system is grappling with in today’s world of work with its increasing complexity.
The importance of specific knowledge as a useful way to prepare learners for
productive future functioning in the world of work is paramount. A divergent
approach is needed today. With the great increase of knowledge and changes in
most fields as well as the arrival of many new fields, it is important to equip
learners with the ability for self-directed learning and self-growth. Therefore,
convergent and divergent teaching approaches are both needed and the
challenging question is how to strike the balance between them with-in the
intricacy of the process of teaching and learning. It is probable that the two
approaches may increasingly become not mutually exclusive but interrelated and
interdependent. Convergent problems often need divergent thinking, and there
are assessments that encourage both convergent and divergent processes.

Educators and stake holders must recognize that change is a major part of
education, whether it is change in instruction and learning approaches,
technologies or policy. Most of the time the society continues to grapple with
how change occurs. For us to wrestle with the idea of new methods and maximize
the impact on learning, educators must look at what literature reviews say.
Research shows that good student outcomes depends on effective classroom
practices and that learners must be equipped with instruction in skills necessary
to operate success-fully in the society. Brophy (1988) described aspects of
teaching practice which are related to effective classroom learning and student
outcomes. Triumph is influenced by teaching strategies (Wang, Haertel &
Walberg, 1994), and it is therefore important that instructors modify approaches
to ensure equitable pedagogy.

Methods and Approaches 5

Thus, new approaches and emerging technologies that maximize the impact on
learning entail clarity, consistent, pedagogy, feedback and assessment. Clarity
within the classroom has been found to correlate positively with student
achievement, level of engagement, and student satisfaction. The instructor
simplifies the purpose and learning objectives and provides clear standards on
how students can be successful. The instructor presents examples to students so
they can see what the outcome looks like. In conjunction with clarity, the power
of consistency definitely lies in the fact that most things worth doing are difficult
to do and take a lot of time and effort. Consistency clarifies the cause and effect
of positive thinking. Inconsistency confuses cause of learning. Consistency is
about repetition--repeating over again, gaining feedback and adjusting
accordingly to help stay on track towards the goal. And that is the difference
between success and failure in the learning endeavor, and the key to
achievement is collective consistent pedagogy.

These modest approaches offer students concrete apparatuses to achieve

learning through questions, analogies, group learning, critical and reflective
thinking. Students must learn by dissecting information through active learning
by using a variety of resources, learning beyond the classroom and ultimately,
real-life experiences. Students should review their performance as they apply
knowledge learnt. Students must be encouraged to ask them-selves what they
learned from a specific experience. Why did they give the incorrect answer? Did
they miss understand the question? Such questions could enhance the learner’s
strategies and learning outcomes as the learner apply knowledge learned to solve
new problems. In fact, Metcalfe (2009) content that applying knowledge learned
by students to solve new problems is one of the key elements that increases
understanding and learning skills in general.

With a collective consistency, pedagogy represents a distinct way of making

learning engaging and satisfying. Understanding how to manage activities and
instruction in the class-room empowers the instructor to optimize the learning
potential of every learner. Learners who are engaged and challenged see a
realworld value to their school assignments. They are more interested in
learning, knowing where they are, where they are going, and how to get there.
Therefore, effective feedback provides information about how close the learner
is meeting the criterion and details what the learner needs to do to meet the
goal. Shute, (2008) explains that the role of feedback is to tell the learner
whether or not the learner is doing the right thing. Both the mastery of content
and, more importantly, the mastery of how to think re-quire trial-and-error

6 Methods and Approaches

learning are essential to student success. Thus, the instructor must pro-vide
students with the kind of feedback that increases motivation, builds on existing
knowledge, and helps students reflect on what they have learned.

Hattie and Timperley (2007) highlight the importance of being specific as possible
and supply students with specific information about what they are doing right or
wrong. For example, feedback like “excellent work” do not show the learner
what the learner did right, and likewise, a phrase such as “what does this mean”?
Does not give any insight to what the learner did wrong and how the learner can
do better the next time around. Instead, researchers suggest taking the time to
provide learners with information on what exactly they did well, and what may
still need improvement. They also note that it can be helpful to tell the learner
what the learner is doing differently than before. Has a student’s improved since
the last time you assessed their learning? Let learner know about it, even if
learner still has a long way to go (Figure 1).

Numerous studies indicate that feedback is most effective when it is given

immediately. The study from Opitz, Ferdinand, and Mechklinger (2011) looked at
delayed verses immediate feedback. The researchers found that participants who
were given immediate feedback showed a significantly larger increase in
performance than those who had received delayed feedback. Other research
showed that students who received lots of immediate feedback were better able
to comprehend the material they study. Effective feedback addresses the
learner’s advancement toward a goal. The feedback must be clear to the learner
in terms of how the in-formation they are receiving will help them progress

Methods and Approaches 7

toward their final goal. Therefore, feed-back needs to provide information
specifically relating to the task or goal process of learning that fills a gap
between what is understood and what is aimed to be understood (Hattie &
Timperley, 2007), and it can do this through affective processes, such as
increased effort, motivation, or engagement.

Some research noted that the way feedback is presented can have an impact on
how it is received, which means that sometimes even the most well-meaning
feedback can come across the wrong way and reduce a learner’s motivation.
Other research showed that not all feedback is equally effective, and it can even
be counterproductive, especially if the feedback is presented in a solely negative
manner. Research by Deci and Ryan (2008) identified three situations in which
feedback could be counterproductive: i) If learners feel that they are being too
closely monitored, they might become nervous and as a result, disengaged from
learning, ii) Learners may sometimes interpret feedback as an attempt to control
them rather than guidance on how to improve, iii) Feedback shared in a group
setting could cause learners to feel like they have to compete with their peers.

To avoid these three situations, Deci and Ryan suggest fully explaining the
purpose and ensuring that learners understand how the feedback is meant to
help them. Students are what the instructor guides them to do. Learners are the
center of the classroom, not the instructor. However, the instructor is the most
impactful person in the classroom. With helpful feedback, students become more
motivated about learning and confident in their abilities. They take ownership
of their learning. Black and William (1998) found that instructors who used
formative assessment practices with their students, and provided consistent
feedback, significantly improved performance as students make significant gains.

However, while the instruction principles are similar, the landscape between the
traditional models where the instructor is the sage on the stage has changed
quite dramatically in recent years. With flexible instructional approaches and
technological capacities which are evolving with increasing rapidity, teachers can
use multiple ways of teaching and assessment. New paradigms, technology, and
interactivity in themselves do not necessarily constitute an enhancement of the
quality of instruction and learning, quality of content is important, but new
approaches are an enabler for such enhancement. The bottom line, is great
opportunity for both instructors and learners to draw on a wide range of
materials in a variety of formats which can improve the quality of the curriculum.
All things considered, students are exceptional, and so is the way they learn.

8 Methods and Approaches

Thus, the instruction tools used in schools should cater to diverse ways of
learning, with the learner at the center. Most learners will learn better and faster
with the help of interactive technologies and new instructional approaches. A
combination of these, as well as, improving the effectiveness of learning, such
adaptation to learners’ needs leads to significantly better outcomes. A model in
learning that is founded upon modest approaches in education whose aim is the
development of the capacities of each learner. Developing the capacities of
individual learners using technologies to enhance learning goals is an effective
approach to teaching.

THE IMPACT OF MODEST APPROACHES

The impact of modest approaches is intensified by the parallel emergence of new
economic relations at the universal level, subsumed under the emerging
technologies. The gadgets alone will not answer all the challenges in an
educational system. It is difficult for countries to meet the objective of effective
learning, for all, anywhere, anytime. The body of literature shows that the
inability to meet educational challenges, however, is self-inflicted because of
linear scaling, that is, using the same model of education but more of it and on
a larger scale. What educators must do is think outside of the box. The education
ideal developed for the Stone Age or Indus-trial Age cannot achieve educational
empowerment effectively in the twenty-first century. “The Stone Age did not end
because we ran out of stones. The Stone Age ended because we invented bronze
tools, which were more productive.” With technologies, we should be able to
evolve the components of the conventional ideal into the corresponding
components of the new approaches and emerging devices. The rise of new
approaches and emerging technological tools are profoundly changing the way
learners learn, live and work. From preschool to college there is no doubt that
technology is having a major impact on teaching and learning. This in turn is
affecting the skills needed in the world of work. The gap in technology related
skills required in the world of work must be bridged together with new
approaches.

Modest approaches together with emerging technologies and the type of school
curricula can create tension. The competing and often conflicting demands are
in fact ensuring that new approaches, technology and the curricula type remains
alive and well. Tension between new approaches, technology, and the curricula
functions are complimentary. Technology is to improve education and education
is a matter of assuring continuity that is, passing on what is known. On the other

Methods and Approaches 9

hand, it is a matter of nurturing creativity that is propelling learners into the
unknown. The emerging technologies and new approaches are at the same time
complementary and conflicting. They touch the core of the teaching and learning
process. Both the educator and the learner want creativity, but they want it to
emerge from what is known and understood. The learner want continuity, but
when the result is the inability to solve problems, the learner is disappointed.

Often time, technology is referred to in the singular whereas technologies are

very different in their potential and use. The potential of different technologies
depends on how educators use them. Different technologies have the potential
to contribute to different aspects of effective learning. These technologies can
provide and expand access, promoting efficiency, improving the quality of
learning, and enhancing the quality of teaching. Educators must under-stand how
to utilize the technologies to meet the challenges of the learners and make
education relevant, responsive, and effective for anyone, anywhere, anytime.
Technologies have both the potential for knowledge dissemination and effective
learning environment. Yet, if the educational policies and approaches are not
right, and if the conditions for using these technologies are not met at the same
time, this possibility cannot be realized to compliment the world of work.

Justifications for the inclusion of emerging technologies and new approaches in

school curricula must focus on the integration. The reason for technology
integration is the advantage it has for teachers, students and parents. Technology
enables dynamic interaction that is more readily exploited, allows learners to
collaborate, and provides tools to increase productivity. Thus, technological
literacy incorporates the development of occupational skills and participation in
a technological society. At the same time it is a delicate balance for the schools
to predict those occupational skills that will be needed in the future. It is
important to expose students to different types of technology which is the
mainstream of typical life and world of work.

Technology is changing far faster than the schools and policy formulation. As a
result, involvement in a technological society requires an understanding of the
ways in which technology is changing society. Humans are used to a rate of
change that is somewhat contingent and at least allows for reasonable stability.
Today, however, rapid and accelerating technological change is constantly
overthrowing the stability. The complexity of this relationship between
technology and society cannot be overstated, for technology shapes and is
shaped by society. In a global society, these modest approaches, emerging

10 Methods and Approaches

technologies have enormous potential to effect change in schools. They enable
schools to meet a broader range of learners’ necessities, adapting instruction
methods and allows learners to learn anywhere, anytime.

MIXED MODEL
Consequently, education will not be a location anymore, but an activity: a
teaching/learning activity. The ultimate purpose of technologies is to assist
education in teaching and learning activity. Highly interactive mixed model
multimedia learning experience be-tween distant locations and networks. A
mixed model allows learners to obtain simultaneous distance learning services
from dispersed schools and other instructors. In this sense, technologies are not
a substitute for schooling. Technologies constitute one integral element of
education and its learning environment.

In a mixed model course, with the typical instruction and homework,

contentrelated work that was commonly done in a classroom is now given as
homework. Short video instructions are viewed by students at home before they
come to class, while in-class time is dedicated to exercises, projects, or
discussions. Besides, posting instructions online is not a brand-new idea, nor is it
a first for academic settings. The pedagogical model of flipped learning identifies
a core curriculum with concepts and lessons that can be taught through posting
condensed instruction video clips. Flipped learning changes instruction into
collaborative and interactive sessions where students practice that curriculum
and explore their passion.

Mixed model courses have succeeded when strategically aligned with the school’s
mission and goals. The development and delivery of mixed model courses can be
used to address a variety of school, faculty, and student needs. Mixed model
course success has been proven in terms of performance in part because
instructors gain access to real-time data about student performance at each
stage of the learning process. Research by Dziuban, Moskal, and Hartman (2005)
used factor analysis to identify two dimensions of satisfaction, which they
identify as “learning engagement” and “interaction value.” They later identified
eight elements that con-tribute to learner satisfaction in a mixed model courses
(Moskal, Dziuban, & Hartman, 2010). Educators should continue to ask: how can
instructors make the best use of the classroom time they have with learners in
the classroom? Another way to move learners toward higher levels of
understanding is to move the instruction out of the classroom, and use in-person
time for interactions that require applying, relating, and creating. Furthermore,

Methods and Approaches 11

Dziuban, Hartman, Cavanagh, and Moskal (2011) maintains that in the mixed
model tools such as videos, podcasts and online quizzes enhance in and out of
class activity work together. The instruction must be clear about setting and
articulating expectations for digital work and participation.

The benefits gained for students by a mixed model course are realized only if the
associated risks are lessened; for, without careful course planning and design,
the mixed format could offer the worst aspects of both the face-to-face and
online modalities instead of offering the best. The self-motivation is a must for
students to be successful in online learning. With a supportive environment for
instructor and students, the potential of mixed model learning can be realized.
In the mixed model, instructors have the flexibility to incorporate teaching and
learning approaches to increase and enhance their students’ learning processes.

These emerging technologies and new approaches to education are already

having a positive impact on education. Educators must support efforts within the
new paradigm agenda to enhance the quality and reach of education globally.
Research supports many of the propositions of the new approaches. We are
already seeing the facilitation of better quality learning and instruction, as more
interactive content for learning are employed. Methods of instructions and
learning are tailored to individual learners’ needs and learning analytics are
allowing quicker feedback on learners’ performance. The fusion of new
approaches, policy and technology results in interactive environment (Figure 2).

In the body of literature, approaches to orient emerging technologies with

interactive content are discussed. All of them are based on an understanding of

12 Methods and Approaches

the shifting educational landscape. The shifting educational landscape requires
the integration of these approaches to be infused with emerging technologies
and policies that facilitate integration. Policymakers can influence technological
integration as part of an innovation agenda to meet the shifting educational
landscape. Good policy will stimulate and change the conditions for better
implementations.

The emergence of technologies and the evolution of digital games has shaped the
new ways in which learners are learning, communicating, collaborating,
operating, and forming paradigms. In fact, research shows that these
technologies are shaping the way learners think, work, and live. This is especially
true of many learners who are soon to be leaving and entering the workforce and
society-at-large, it is a fully integrated aspect of their lives (Green & Hannon,
2007). Thus, emerging technologies when utilized the right way help many
learners, particularly isolated students. Isolated students, either because of their
location or because of their disability, can become part of communities of
learning in ways that could have not happened before. These are good reasons
to support new approaches and emerging technologies. As research indicates, for
these approaches and emerging technologies to be successful there must be good
pedagogical frameworks. There are still concerns on whether technology and
pedagogy are complimentary or contradictory to each other. The literature
review suggest that technology-rich learning resources must be driven by
pedagogic. The introduction of any technology into the classroom must enhance
existing practices. The question to be asked then, with act of contrition to John
F. Kennedy, is not what the technology can do for instructors and learners, but
what can instructors and learners do with the technology?

POLICY CONCERNS
From the standpoint of policy makers who are aware and informed about the
issues that arise in the current global society. Sound policy making requires
determined and focused goals. No goal is more important than ensuring access
to education by removing barriers. Global society must respond to forces within
and without to embrace new approaches and emerging technologies. The policy
concerns are effective curriculum planning involving sub-jects and instructors
with interest in new approaches, emerging technologies and solid policies. Topics
must be explored in multi-disciplinary ways, while not losing touch with the
content, skills and assessment targets of the curriculum.

Methods and Approaches 13

The curriculum must be built round a sequence of learning journeys. The scope
and focus of each journey must be mapped. With these approaches, every
subject begins with anticipation. The interest is to get learners inspired and make
them want to know more. This approach gives clarity to the breadth of learning
involved. In between the excitement, inspiration and the outcome. Offering a
variety of approaches, including access through technologies, means that
students do not give up when they encounter a problem. At the end of every
learning, students will be able to evaluate the experience in terms of the skills
they have acquired or improved and the knowledge and understanding they have
gained.

The body of literature points to the need for the preschool teacher to be placed
crucially with regard to literacy learning in the early childhood years. Much of
children’s accumulated knowledge could be utilized in the transition process.
The literacy curriculum in the early years of childhood must become seamless
and ensure that children are engaged in satisfying literacy based activities on a
regular and systematic basis. Professional development programs must be
conducted on the issue of new approaches, emerging technologies and policy.
Professional development programs must make sure that schools are certain
about how to respond to these changes. So that the initiatives that are dispersed
and are not inept, policy planners must al-ways clear obstacles that might
prevent integration of new modes and emerging technologies into the education
system.

CONCLUSION
We established that new approaches to learning and teaching are made possible
by emerging technologies that complement and consolidate policy and further
advance instruction and learning. The chapter showed that moving away from
the traditional modes toward modest approaches of flexible, modular, and
interoperable learning arrangements (Bush & Mott 2009) help schools,
instructors, and learners. However, it would be ingenuous to suggest that by
changing the traditional way of instruction and learning will result in teaching
and learning improvements of any kind. As White, Ringstaff, and Kelley (2002)
note, while new approaches and emerging technology are supporting and
bringing change in education, they will have little impact without clear policies.

New instructional approaches and emerging technologies together with

wellplanned policy have been identified as an important tool for realizing a new

14 Methods and Approaches

paradigm of learner-centered education and content interaction that better
supports learners’ needs. Components such as providing interactive content,
giving immediate feedback, identifying learners’ needs, and having student
electronic portfolios are critical elements in learner-centered instruction for
learners (Reigeluth et al., 2008). Thus, new instructional approaches, emerging
technologies and clear policy have the potential of greater success in the new
paradigm shift. They remove traditional models, allow mixed models and open
up learning thereby removing the barriers that stand in the way of innovation
and employ new learning methodologies.

The dialogue of methods to implement changes in the approach to teaching and

learning come from the realization that often the attempts at reforming the
education system tend to be ineffective. The attempts to use standardized
testing in addressing the problems of the complex education system have never
produced the best outcomes. Certainly, there are no simple general solutions to
those diverse and complex problems. Undoubtedly, a mixed model with modest
approaches offers a practicable solution. The above recommendations of some
differentiated approaches are beneficial and can have significant positive effects
on the teaching and learning process in education system.

In the modern world that is rapidly evolving, both the learner and the instructor
must work hard and persist when there is an obstacle or change. Change is a
major part of life, whether it is change in education or emerging technologies
that have an impact on learning. Infusing teaching approaches with students’
characteristics are critical steps toward solving the particularly difficult
problems of instructional approaches and learning processes. Certainly, some
difficulties are encountered not only by instructors but also by policy makers in
the endeavor to adapt instructional changes to meet students’ needs.

REFERENCE
Ackoff, R. L., & Greenberg, D. (2008). Turning learning right side up. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.

Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through
classroom assessment. London: King’s College.

Methods and Approaches 15

Brophy, J. (1988). Educating teachers about managing classrooms and students.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 1-18.

Bush, M., & Mott, J. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology.
Educational Technology, 49(1), 3–20.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and

psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian
Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14-23.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14 Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., &
Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning and the
generations: Knowledge is power-no more. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore
(Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp.
85-100). Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.

Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Cavanagh, T. B., & Moskal, P. D. (2011). Blended
courses as drivers of institutional transformation. In A. Kitchenham (Ed.),
Blended learning across disciplines: Models for implementation (pp. 1737).
Sterling, VA: Stylus. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0. ch002

Green, H., & Hannon, C. (2007). Their Space: Education for a digital generation,
online version, accessed August 4 2017, http://www.demos.co.uk/files/
Their%20space%20-%20web.pdf

Guilford, J. P., Green, R. F., & Christensen, P. R. (1950). A factor-analytic study

of reasoning abilities: I. Hypothesis and description of test. Report from
the Psychological Laboratory, University of Southern California, Los
Angeles.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational
Research, 77, 81–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Metcalfe J. (2009). Metacognitive judgements and control of study. Current

Directions in Psychological Science 18:159-163

Moskal, P.D., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2010). Online learning: A transforming
environment for adults in higher education. In T. T. Kidd (Ed.), Online
education and adult learning: New frontiers for teaching practices (pp.
54-68). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

16 Methods and Approaches

Opitz, B., Ferdinand, N. K., & Mecklinger, A. (2011). Timing matters: The impact
of immediate and delayed feedback on artificial language learning.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(8).
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00008

Reigeluth, C. M., Watson, W. R., Watson, S. L., Dutta, P., Chen, Z., & Powell, N.
(2008). Roles for technology in the information-age paradigm of education:
Learning management systems. Educational Technology, 48(6), 32–39

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational

Research, 78, 153–189. http://dx.doi.org//10.3102/0034654307313795

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1994). What helps students learn?
Educational Leadership, 51, 74-79.

White, N., Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). Getting the most from technology
in schools. San Francisco: WestEd. Retrieved from ERIC database.
(ED471137)

White, W. F. (1990). Divergent thinking vs. convergent thinking - A GT anomaly.

Education, 111(2), 208-213

Methods and Approaches 17

The Role of Technology (Social Media) in Exploration
Study Lesson at Elementary School Teacher
Education Program
Muhammad Arief Budiman
Murywantobroto

ABSTRACT
The use of technology in teaching has become a natural thing lately.
The purpose of this research is to know the influence of the use of
technology in the exploratory study lesson in the elementary school
teacher department, School of Education, University of PGRI
Semarang. This research is qualitative descriptive. The subject of
research is 45 students of fourth semester majoring in elementary
school teacher department, School of Education, University of PGRI
Semarang who take exploratory study lesson. Data collection tools
use observation, interview and documentation. Data analysis
techniques is using Miles and Huberman techniques. The results
indicate that the use of technology in the lesson of exploration study
is considered succesful seen from the students’ responses. Students
provide positive feedback regarding the use of technology, especially
youtube social media as a medium of uploading final assignment. The
students can provide an evaluation of the use of the technology they
have experienced in exploratory study learning, but they still provide
an abstract description when asked to explain the technology
suitable for the learner in college. While the explanation they
provide for the use of technology in primary school learning is a bit
clear with the mention of examples. For that we still have to keep
looking for the right technology to apply to the students in college.

Keywords: technology in education, social media youtube,

exploration study

INTRODUCTION
The world of education at the present time is very advanced and tight in the
competition so the stakeholders in it that is the educational foundation must

18 Methods and Approaches

participate in a tight competition in maintaining its business which can be seen
from the quality of service, learning innovation, and educational funds being set.

From various aspects, there are some problems. The problem in the world of
education in general, in the learning process in particular is the lack of
innovation. Innovation meant here is the concept of an interesting learning that
can make the learning process becomes fun and interesting so that learners do
not become bored in following the process of learning in the classroom. Students
who are not bored will become active in participating in class lessons in the
classroom. To create it, there needs to be innovation in the world of education,
especially in the learning process that can create a fun learning process.

Based on description above, the solution is the use of technology in general and
the use of social media in particular. The use of social media becomes an
interesting thing because students who are younger generation cannot be
separated from the reach of social media wherever they are. There are many
social media used by the students, among others: Facebook, twitter, instagram,
path, YouTube, and others.

Here being discussed is YouTube as one of the social media for the final
assessment tool for students 4th semester Elementary School Teacher education
Program, Faculty of Education, Universitas PGRI Semarang. From the practice
initiated by this tutor, it was found that there were various responses from the
learners who took the exploratory study course. Various responses are divided
into two. The first is the abstract response for answering questions of what kind
of technology they want that can be applied in education. The second is a rather
clear response for answering questions of what kind of technology are suitable
for children of elementary school.

TECHNOLOGY
Technology is a knowledge aimed at creating tools, action processing and
extraction of objects. The term “technology” has been widely recognized and
everyone has their own way of understanding the notion of technology.
Technology is used to solve problems in our daily lives. Briefly we can describe
technology as a product, process, or organization. In addition, technology is used
to expand our capabilities, and that makes people as the most important part of
any technological system. (Supardan, 2010: 69).

Methods and Approaches 19

Technology is also an application of science to solve problems. But what we must
know is that technology and science are different subjects that work from
handto-hand to accomplish a particular task or solve a particular problem.

Technology is applied in almost everything we do in our lives; We use technology

in the workplace; We use it for extract material; We use technology for
communication, transportation, studying, manufacturing, creating tools,
securing data, business scale, and more. Technology is a human knowledge
involving tools, materials, and systems. Application of technology produces tools
or products. If the technology is applied properly, it can be beneficial to humans;
but if incorrectly applied, it can cause damage to humans.

Many businesses use technology to stay competitive, they create new products
and services using technology, and they also use technology to deliver products
and services to their customers in a timely fashion. A good example is mobile
companies like Apple and Samsung, these two electronics companies, using
topnotch technology to create new smartphones and other electronic devices to
stay competitive. This competitive advantage is obtained through the use of
advanced technology.

MEDIA SOCIAL
Social media is an online medium, with its users can easily participate, share,
and create content including blogs, social networks, wikis, forums and virtual
worlds. Blogs, social networks and wikis are the most common form of social
media used by people around the world. Another opinion says that social media
is an online medium that supports social interaction and social media is using
webbased technology that turns communication into interactive dialogue.
(Briggs, 2006: 50).

Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlein define social media as “an internetbased
application group that builds on the foundation of Web 2.0 ideology and
technology, and which enables the creation and exchange of user-generated
content”.

Social networking is a site where everyone can create a personal web page, then
connect with friends to share information and communicate. The biggest social
networks include Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter. If traditional media uses print
media and broadcast media, then social media use the internet. Social media

20 Methods and Approaches

invites anyone interested in participating by contributing and feedback openly,
commenting, and sharing information in quick and unlimited time.

As internet and mobile phone technology is getting more advanced then social
media also grows rapidly. Now to access Facebook or twitter for example, can be
done anywhere and anytime just by using a mobile phone. People can access
social media fast resulting in a big phenomenon against the flow of information
not only in developed countries, but also in Indonesia. Because of the speed of
social media, it also began to appear to replace the role of conventional media
in spreading the news.

The rapid development of social media is now because everyone is like to have
their own media. If to have traditional media such as television, radio, or
newspaper required a large capital and a lot of workforce, then another case
with the media. A social media user can access using social media with internet
network even the slow access though, without big cost, without expensive tool
and done alone without employees. We as users of social media can freely edit,
add, and modify texts, images, video, graphics, and various other content
models.

EXPLORATORY STUDY
There are various kinds of lessons in the Elementary School Teacher education
Program, Faculty of Education, Universitas PGRI Semarang. The subjects are
generally aimed to form learners to become a person who has a good character
so that later they will be eligible to become teachers and deserve to be role
models for their students later. In addition lessons in Elementary School Teacher
education Program also aims to prepare the learners to have the provision of
sufficient skills to become elementary school teachers. Various kinds of skills are
implanted in the participants so that they will be able to master the demands of
the work world that requires teachers with various skills.

One of the lesson in Elementary School Teacher education Program is exploratory

study. This lesson aims to educate the learners to have the skills in the field,
among them: observing, being structured, interviewing, socializing, being polite,
being responsible, reporting, cooperating, being meticulous, being organized,
and others. In exploratory studies, students are given the task to go to the field.
In one class of 45 students, they were divided into five groups. This group takes
place in one semester. Then they were given the task of 5 major projects which

Methods and Approaches 21

are all field projects: regional library observation, tugumuda observation, old
town observation, mangrove forest observation, and Bali observation. In these
projects, all students / all groups must go to the field. They make observations,
and at the end of the semester they make observation reports.

LEARNING MEDIA
The development of science and technology increasingly encourage renewal
efforts in the utilization of technology results in teaching and learning process.
Teachers are required to be able to use the tools that can be provided by the
school, and it is not possible that the tools are in accordance with the
development and demands of the times. Teachers may at least be able to use
cheap and humble tools but are required in order to achieve the intended
teaching objectives. (Arsyad, 2000: 41)

Besides being able to use the tools available, teachers are also required to be
able to develop the available tools; teachers are also required to be able to
develop skills to create teaching media that will be used if the media is not yet
available.

Learning Media means everything that can be used to stimulate the mind,
feelings, attention and ability or skills of learners so as to encourage the learning
process. Meanwhile, according to Briggs (1977) learning media is a physical
means to deliver content / learning materials such as: books, movies, videos and
so forth. Then according to National Education Association (1969) revealed that
the media learning is a means of communication in the form of printed media
and audio visual, including hardware technology.

Definition of the learning media is all the teaching tools used to help conveying
the subject matter in the process of teaching and learning so as to facilitate the
achievement of learning objectives that have been formulated.

FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION

The term FGD or Focus Group Discussion is currently very popular and widely used
as a method of data collection in a social study. Then, what is the FGD? Simply
FGD can be interpreted as a discussion conducted in a systematic and directed
way about a particular issue or problem. FGD or Focus Group Discussion is a form
of qualitative research in which participants can ask questions about their
attitudes to the issues in the topics covered.

22 Methods and Approaches

Meanwhile, according to Irwanto (1998) put forward his opinion on the definition
of Focus Group Discussion is a process of collecting information of a particular
problem which is specific through group discussion. According to Hening and
Coloumbia (1990) mentioned that focus group discussions are interviews from a
small group of people led by a resource person or moderator who subtly
encourages participants to dare to speak openly and spontaneously about what
is considered important related to the topic of discussion which is being
discussed. (Irwanto, 2010: 33)

In FDG interaction among participants is a basis for obtaining information. Each

participant has the same opportunity to file and post statement, respond to,
comment or ask a question. The purpose of focus group discussions is to get input
or information about the problems that are local and specific. While the
settlement of the problem is determined by the other party after input is
received and analyzed.

DISCUSSION
Technology cannot be separated from our lives in all aspects, including
education. Technology in education is very helpful in the process of teaching and
learning so that learners are able to obtain all the skills they have to master. It
cannot be denied that the role of this technology is very helpful in that regard.
Technology is also in line with the development of the era. In the present era,
the condition of learners is different from the condition of learners in earlier
times, the era before technology was rampant. Now everyone, including children
(also learners) is addicted to technology (gadgets). This can be used by
educational practitioners to create something innovative so that learners are
able to follow what we want without having to let go of what they want (addicted
to gadgets).

One of technologies that cannot be separated from children (learners) is social

media. There are so many social media, among them: Facebook, twitter,
instagram, YouTube, path and others. Here it will be discussed about YouTube.
YouTube is a free service to upload, download, and view videos online. There are
various types of videos that exist on YouTube, including: music video, motivation
video, teaching video, tutorials video, and others.

With the above description, then YouTube can be used in the learning process. In
this case, it is in the learning process exploratory study lesson. The educational

Methods and Approaches 23

practitioner takes advantage of YouTube as a means of evaluating the final
project for exploratory study courses. As described above, in the course of
exploratory study the students are divided into several groups and they are given
the task of five major projects. At the end of the assignment, students must
gather their observations in the five major projects. Here the teacher brings the
students to make the final report in the form of a video. And the teacher assigned
them to upload the video to YouTube. The teacher assigns a score after the video
has been successfully viewed online by the teacher.

The description above explains how the process of using technology (social
media: YouTube) in the learning process in exploratory study course. Teachers
take advantage of YouTube social media technology in the evaluation process.
From the results of observations of researchers, the process is said to have a
positive impact. The students become more thorough in making the final task
due to their awareness that their final video-shaped task must be uploaded to
YouTube where later the video will be accessible to all viewers from all over the
world. With that awareness they want to make the final video the best they can.

While in the results of interviews, researchers found two types of feedback. The
first is about their abstract responses when asked what type of technology they
want for their learning process. They respond that they want technology that is
fun, interesting, and good. The second is a rather clear response when they are
asked about what kind of technology is suitable for elementary school children.
They gave the answer that technology suitable for elementary school children is
a game. Because children are still in development then they still love to play,
with this awareness then the technology suitable for learning process in
elementary school is the game. While the data from the documentation when
they implement focus group discussion is the researcher found that there are
some obstacles mentioned by the students related to the application of social
media technology YouTube in learning exploration study course. Some of the
obstacles are: (1) they have no credit to access the internet to upload their final
assignment video, (2) when they use campus free Wi-Fi facility, sometimes
connections are down (3) when uploading videos they take a long time because
the video file size is very large (4) when they make a video, they feel they do
not have the maximum ability in editing, so they make the final video in a simple
way (maximal in their capacity).

From the explanation, it can be seen that the use of YouTube social media
technology in learning in exploratory study course is able to support the purpose

24 Methods and Approaches

of learning course that is this lesson aims to educate the students to have the
skills in the field, among them: observing, being structured, interviewing,
socializing, communicating, being courteous, being responsible, reporting,
cooperating, being thorough, being organized, and others. (1) observation skill
occurs when they go into the field and this can be seen from their final
assignment video (2) structured skill is implemented with five pre meetings each
before they go to the field for each project (3) Socializing / communicating skill
is done successfully, they plunge into the field and communicate well and
courteously with the people they meet in each of the places of assignment (4)
responsible accountability is done with the success of the students’ visits to
several assignment places where the student is able to take responsibility not to
do any damage in those places and they are also responsible for bringing the good
name of the institution in public (5) the cooperation skill is accomplished by
group discussion to make the observation instrument before entering the field,
the cooperation is also done when the students do the observation in the field,
besides that cooperation is also carried out when they make the final report (6)
the ability to report executed with the creation of final project video that has
been uploaded on YouTube (7) skill to be meticulous is executed by the students
successfully make the final report well and true (8) skill to be organized is done
successfully with the success of the students accommodate the tasks in
accordance with the procedures of the arrangement of the assignment.

CONCLUSION
From the above explanation it can be concluded that this is a reflective research
in which the study presented in this presentation is all things that have been
implemented by teachers who are also domiciled as a researcher. From the
existing explanation, it can be concluded that the use of YouTube media social
technology as a means for evaluation in the course of exploratory study is said
to succeed. This is shown from the response of the students when researchers
collect data by methods of observation, interviews, and documentation. The
student’s response is positive for the application of social media technology
YouTube in the learning process of exploratory study course. Another effect that
researchers get from the observation is the increase of student creativity in order
to make the final report in the form of video. This is due to their awareness that
the final report in the form of the video will be uploaded to YouTube which will
be accessible to all viewers from all over the world. So with that awareness they
are trying their best to make videos as well as possible.

Methods and Approaches 25

 REFERENCES
Arsyad, Azhar. 2000. Media Pengajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Briggs, Asa . 2006. Sejarah Sosial Media. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia

Emzir. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Analisis Data. Jakarta:

Rajawali Pers.

Irwanto. 2010. Focused Group Discussion. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia

Supardan. 2009. Ilmu, Teknologi Dan Etika. Jakarta: BPK Gunung Mulia

26 Methods and Approaches

E-LEARNING
 Evaluation of E-learning Activity Effectiveness in
Higher Education Through Sentiment Analysis by
Using Naïve Bayes Classifier
Eka Angga Laksana
Ase Suryana
Ai Rosita
Heri Heryono

ABSTRACT
Sentiment analysis as part of text mining research domain has been
being recognized due to the successful implementation in social
media analysis. Sentiment analysis methods had intelligent ability to
classify texts into negative or positive. Classified texts concluded
whole users respond and described opinion polarity about particular
topic. Based on this idea, this research took e-learning’s users
opinion as object to be measured through sentiment analysis. The
results can be used to evaluate the e-learning activity. This research
had been implemented in Widyatama University which had been
running e-learning activity for several years. Qualitative method by
given questioner to users and gather the feedback is commonly used
as evaluation of e-learning system previously. Still, questioner
doesn’t represent the conclusion about the whole opinion. Hence, it
needs the method to identify opinion polarity from e-learning
member. The e-learning opinion data sets were gathered from
questioner filled by e-learning member included both student and
lecturer as participants. The participants gave review about learning
outcome after their participation in e-learning activity. Their
opinion was needed to describe current situation about e-learning
activity. Therefore, the conclusion could be used to make
improvement and described few achievements about the e-learning
system. The data sets trained by Naïve Bayes classifier to group each
user respond into negative or positive. The classification results
were also evaluated by a number of particular evaluation metric

28 E-Learning
 used in data mining to show the classifier performance such as
accuracy, precision, and recall.

Keywords: classifier, evaluation, e-learning, sentiment, naïve bayes

INTRODUCTION
The rapid growth of the internet based technology leads to revolution in
education area. The traditional face to face learning changed by web based
learning and relieve distance during learning process (Guri-rosenblit, 2005). Web
based learning which known as e-learning system has numerous approach in
different educational level. Now days a lot of educational institution offering e-
learning as part of learning activity especially in higher education (Garrison &
Anderson, 2011; Guri-rosenblit, 2005). E-learning system defined as the
improvement of teaching quality through multimedia and internet technologies.
E-learning not only provide teaching material and educational service but also
evaluation scheme, exchange information and collaborative learning between
student and lecturers (Dominici & Palumbo, 2013; Nichols, 2008). The main
purposes behind Education institutions use the e-learning technology is to
improve learning outcomes. They believe that more participation, self-regulated
and interactive communication are considered as key factor to improve learning
outcomes (Garrison & Anderson, 2011; Persico, Manca, & Pozzi, 2014). Recently,
e-learning platforms also introduced in public administrations and corporations
to make learning quality better than traditional teaching (Stoffregen, Pawlowski,
& Pirkkalainen, 2015; Violante & Vezzetti, 2013).

E-learning effectiveness contain detailed information based on evaluation result

of e-learning system. It can lead to reflection and revision of the learning
approach adopted in educational institutions (K. Lee, 2005; Novo-corti, Varela-
candamio, & Ramil-díaz, 2013). Usually educational institutions do the
assessment into their e-learning system to know the effectiveness which useful
to know learning outcomes that has been achieved and possibly compared
current or previous method and approach. E-learning effectiveness sometimes
difficult to measure empirically without controlling all involved variable which
still difficult to do in real environment. This paper purposes to perform the
analysis of the e-learning system effectiveness based on personal feedback
retrieved from both student and teacher. We believe that “what other people

E-Learning 29
think” has become important piece of information for the people during decision
making process(Pang & Lee, 2008). Therefore, the personal impression retrieved
from student and teacher could be a good indicator about e-learning
effectiveness and also useful for top level management to create decision.

Sentiment or opinions are key of our activity, because human behavior influenced
based on it. Human decision sometimes influenced by the other opinion. In the
real world, organization and business always try to improve their product and
service by finding out about customer’s opinion. It is commonly happened
because customer always want to know about another opinion of a product
before purchasing it. This paper conducted based on this idea, whether the e-
learning participant opinion would lead to proper advice for decision making
process.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: Review of literature on e-

learning evaluation and previous research in sentiment analysis; Discusses the
research method of this study included data preparation and experimental setup;
Discusses the experiment result and analysis; Finally summarize the result and
suggest the possibility for the next research.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Research in e-learning becomes interesting as more and more higher education
in the world wide has been used e-learning system for their course delivery and
tried to comprehend how effective and usable related to interaction between
human and computer (Bringula, 2013; Escobar-rodriguez & Monge-lozano, 2012;
Navimipour & Zareie, 2015). Positive user experience could indicates the
acceptance, satisfactions and efficiency of academic institutions (Hubackova,
2014). The system itself is not adequate to sustain new educational approach like
e-learning, therefore higher education must understand and learn whether users
have got positive or negative experience during their study(Laurillard, Wasson,
B., & Hoppe, 2009; Persico et al., 2014). E-learning system meet the
requirements when users satisfy and feel positively (Capece & Campisi, 2013; S.
M. Lee, Kim, & Lee, 2016; Yeh & Lin, 2015).

About Moodle
Moodle originally design by Martin Dougmias, was released on 20 August 2002.
Moodle is known as robust open source e-learning platform was developed by
collaboration effort of international community. Until now, Moodle e-learning

30 E-Learning
platform still continually improved to give teacher, administrator and student
with a stable, secure and increased learning experience. Currently, Widyatama
University adapt “Blended Learning” as e-learning method approach. Blended
Learning is learning approach that uses both face-to-face and e-
learning(Graham, 2003). Classroom based teaching enable the student to
consolidating their skill and knowledge. It usually held on first and near exam
meeting, while the online learning has been held at the rest schedule. Online
learning by Moodle allows the student to gain the resource and doing activity to
make sure that they can revise their works, discuss in forum and involve in quiz.

METHODS
The data was collected from e-learning system at Widyatama University. We
create questionnaire form opened 5 January 2017 and closed on 4 February 2017.
The questions were asked to the e-learning participant from both teacher and
student through questionnaire form. The whole of Participants was recently use
moodle e-learning platform as learning activity in Widyatama University. They
are registered e-learning member on running semester which have been enrolled
in moodle class during running semester. The participants must fill their opinion
about e-learning system that they have experienced before.

The e-learning user’s response corpus has 272 positive and 168 negative
sentences. This research has used 4/5 of them as training set, and the rest as
test set. This constructs dataset containing 351 training instances and 89 test
instances. The naïve Bayes classifier training method has created a token list in
the form of [(feats, label)], where feats is feature dictionary and label the
classification label. Feats contains {word:True} and label will be ‘positive’ or
‘negative’. This study, we assume the corpus as direct opinions. They are easier
to handle, otherwise indirect opinions often needs more time to deal with(Liu,
2012). For evaluation methods, this study uses nltk.classify.util.accuracy, nltk.
precision, nltk.recall and nltk.f_measure library (Steven, Klein, & Loper, 2009).

This research uses NLTK (Natural Language Toolkit), a python based programs
which known as platform to work with human language data (Steven et al., 2009).
Naïve bayes has been used as base classifier algorithm to train corpus.

The experiment which has been conducted in this research follows a number of
steps as described below:

E-Learning 31
Collect the data through questioner, as explained before that questioner form
has been distributed to e-learning participant for both student and teacher in
certain periods of time.

Data preprocessing, retrieve the participant’s feedback. Create separation

manually toward dataset into positive and negative corpus.

Feature extraction, decide the relevant feature for classifier by selecting

specific words.

Training and testing dataset, cutoff for both positive and negative corpus as
much as 80% for training set and 20% for testing.

Classify using naïve Bayes classifier, implements machine learning algorithm to

learn word pattern that represent sentiment.

performance evaluation, perform the evaluation scheme include accuracy,

precision, recall and F-measure metric.

Conclude the sentiment result, extract the most important feature based on
classification result, useful for higher education to create decision for future
improvement on e-learning system.

Naïve Bayes Classifier

“Time”
Posi�ve Nega�ve

Above figure illustrate training corpus which most classified into negative so the
classifier starts closer to the” negative” label. In this example, the input
document contains the word “time” which strong indicator for “positive” label.
After each feature has made its contribution, the naïve bayes checks which it is
indicated to, and defining that label to the input. For example, the word “time”
occur in 80% of the positive document, 20% in negative document. Calculated
likehood score, by multiplied by 0.8 for the positive label and 0.2 for negative
label. The whole effects, will be to decrease the score of the negative more than
positive label.

32 E-Learning
Naïve bayes algoritm creates classification by finding the probability for a label.
First, it uses the Bayes rule define Q (label|features) in term of Q (label) and
Q(features|label) and N(feature|label)

(1)

Naïve Bayes algorithm then makes the ‘naïve’ assumption which whole features
are independent as formulated below:

(2)

Then for each label, the algorithm calculates the numerator and normalized them
by sum to one as represented in the following formula:

(3)

Accuracy has been commonly used to evaluate a classifier. It shows the

percentage of test set which is correctly labeled. In this study uses nltk.classify.
accuracy(Steven et al., 2009) to calculate the accuracy classified sentiment on
a given test set.

Since sometimes the number of relevant document lower that irrelevant

document, the accuracy scores for irrelevant labeled document would be near
to 100%. Therefore, there are four terms to represent different set of measures.
Relevant items correctly identified as relevant defined as “True positives” (TP).
irrelevant items which correctly identified as negative defined as “True
negative” (TN). “False positive” (FP) defined as irrelevant items that are
incorrectly identified as relevant, and finally “false negative” (FN) as relevant
items which is incorrectly identified as irrelevant.

Precision and recall is another performance evaluation which tried to overcome

shortcomings of accuracy. Because sometimes accuracy can be misleading in
“search task” while attempting to find data which relevant to an appropriate
task. Precision indicates the number of relevant items which identified were

E-Learning 33
relevant, with the formula is TP/(TP+FP). Recall shows the number of relevant
items which successfully identified by the formula TP/(TP+FN). F-measure (F-
score) combined by precision and recall, also defined as harmonic mean of
precision and recall by the formula (2 x precision x recall) / (precision + recall).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Accuracy
After the evaluation process, the algorithm shows accuracy on 87.5%. It means
87.5% was correctly labelled on the test set.

Precision, Recall and F-Measure

As shown on table 1, 93% recall means every user’s responses that has identified
positive correctly. Very few false negatives in the positives class. Correct positive
classification identified with 87% positive precision and the rest 13% identified
as false positive for positive label. Negative precision as 87.9% indicates very few
false positive for the negative class. Relatively high recall causes about 23% false
negative for negative label. F-Measure shows weighted harmonic means between
precision and recall.

Informative Features
Table 1. Precision and recall score
pos precision: 0.872852233677

pos recall: pos 0.933823529412

F-measure: 0.902309058615

neg precision: 0.879194630872

neg recall: neg 0.779761904762

F-measure:
0.826498422713

34 E-Learning
Table 1 shows the most informative feature which affect the sentiment degree.
The table only shows ten informative features sorted by their ratio in feature
label. The table also shows that the training set which contain the word “kuis”
reaches 13.5 labeled as negative more often than positively labeled. Another
feature is the word “forum” also labeled as negative more than positive as much
as 10.7 times higher.
Table 2. Most informative feature
word Feature label
contains(kuis) = True negative : positive = 13.5 : 1.0 contains(forum) =

True negative : positive = 10.7 : 1.0 contains(quiz) = True

negative : positive = 10.2 : 1.0 contains(kurang) = True

negative : positive = 10.1 : 1.0 contains(sulit) = True

negative : positive = 9.2 : 1.0 contains(tetapi) = True

negative : positive = 9.2 : 1.0 contains(ketika) = True

negative : positive = 8.1 : 1.0 contains(dosen) = True

negative : positive = 7.9 : 1.0 contains(apalagi) = True

negative : positive = 7.0 : 1.0 contains(menggunakan) = True

negative : positive = 7.0 : 1.0

Table also shows the result that needed by top level management to create
decision making. The words that appear in most informative feature can be
analyzed to find the major drawback on current e-learning system. In addition,
selecting relevant feature and deciding how to handle with it for learning process
leads into learning model ability to create a good model. In this study, we use a
fairly simple and obvious set of features which is carefully constructed during
data preparation. Typically, feature extraction involves trial-and-error process
guided by intuition about what information is correct related to the problem.

E-Learning 35
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
In this paper, we have performed classification on e-learning participant’s
opinions. The opinion datasets have been labeled into positive and negative
which divided into training and testing set. Naïve Bayes algorithm has been used
as learning method and shows the accuracy by 87.5%. Another evaluation also
performed with precision, recall and F-measure to represent relevant and
irrelevant document and they show a good result. It means the model has been
successfully used to classify opinion and extract the most important features to
be used by top level management to create decision making. The critical point
that represent drawback and effectiveness has been shown on Table 2. More
analyzed by using simple statistic can be used by utilizing each word contained
in the most informative feature as the main keyword to create improvement and
learning outcome achieved by student. Another improvement could be made to
achieve better result since this study focus on direct opinion. As suggestion for
the research, the different type of opinion method can be used to improve
machine learning ability.

REFERENCE

Bringula, R. P. (2013). Computers & Education In fl uence of faculty- and web

portal design-related factors on web portal usability : A hierarchical
regression analysis. Computers & Education, 68, 187–198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2013.05.008

Capece, G., & Campisi, D. (2013). User satisfaction affecting the acceptance of
an e-learning platform as a mean for the development of the human
capital, (April), 37–41.

Dominici, G., & Palumbo, F. (2013). How to build an e-learning product : Factors
for student / customer satisfaction. Business Horizons, 56(1), 87–96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.09.011

36 E-Learning
Escobar-rodriguez, T., & Monge-lozano, P. (2012). Computers & Education The
acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students.

Computers & Education, 58(4), 1085–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

compedu.2011.11.012

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century A

Framework for Research and Practice.pdf. Taylor & Francis.

Graham, C. R. (2003). DEFINITION, CURRENT TRENDS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS.

Guri-rosenblit, S. (2005). Eight Paradoxes in the Implementation Process of E-

learning in Higher Education, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.
hep.8300069

Hubackova, S. (2014). Effectiveness and evaluation of on-line courses. Procedia

- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
sbspro.2014.07.375

Laurillard, D., Wasson, B., M., & Hoppe, U. (2009). Implementing

technologyenhanced learning. In Technology-enhanced learning.

Lee, K. (2005). E-Learning : The Quest for Effectiveness, 2.

Lee, S. M., Kim, Y. R., & Lee, J. (2016). An Empirical Study of the Relationships
among End-User Information Systems Acceptance , Training , and
Effectiveness An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User
Information Systems Acceptance , Training , and Effectiveness, 1222(April).
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518086

Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, (May).

Navimipour, N. J., & Zareie, B. (2015). Computers in Human Behavior A model for
assessing the impact of e-learning systems on employees ’ satisfaction, 53,
2011–2013.

Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning

diffusion, 39(4), 598–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
8535.2007.00761.x

Novo-corti, I., Varela-candamio, L., & Ramil-díaz, M. (2013). Computers in

Human Behavior E-learning and face to face mixed methodology :

E-Learning 37
 Evaluating effectiveness of e-learning and perceived satisfaction for a
microeconomic course using the Moodle platform. Computers in Human
Behavior, 29(2), 410–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.006

Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis, 2, 1–135.
https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000001

Persico, D., Manca, S., & Pozzi, F. (2014). Computers in Human Behavior Adapting
the Technology Acceptance Model to evaluate the innovative potential of
e-learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 614–622. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.045

Steven, B., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural Language Processing with
Python.

Stoffregen, J., Pawlowski, J. M., & Pirkkalainen, H. (2015). Computers in Human

Behavior A Barrier Framework for open E-Learning in public
administrations.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2014.12.024

Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2013). Virtual Interactive E-Learning Application

: An Evaluation of the Student Satisfaction, 72–91.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ cae.21580

Yeh, Y., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Aptitude-Treatment Interactions during Creativity

Training in E-Learning : How Meaning-Making , Self-Regulation , and
Knowledge Management Influence Creativity, 18, 119–131.

Starting an Online Class Exchange: Gains, Fails, and

Future

Mikio Fuse

ABSTRACT
This paper reviews the results of the two web meeting sessions my
Film Study seminar students had this spring with the Play
Performance classes of Dr. Ouda Teda Ena and Mr. Krisna Septa of

38 E-Learning
 Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. Dr. Ouda and I met at the
ASEACCU [Association of Southeast and East Asian Catholic Colleges
and Universities] conference in the previous year. It was the first
experience for both parties to organize an online class exchange
event.

The primary reasons I sought my partner in ASEACCU affiliate schools

were the assumptions that students sharing the common Asian
cultural backgrounds but speaking different first languages would be
positively motivated to communicate in the common second language
(English), and that the minimum time difference between the schools
located along the Northeast and Southeast Asian axis would give
more chances to organize real-time web meeting events. Both
expected vantage points, however, proved not very easy to gain in
practice.

In this paper, I would identify a couple of basic problems we faced in

our first online class exchange experience: the difference of class
periods, the asynchronous learning curves due to unparallel semester
periods, and the apparent imbalance of overall secondlanguage
competence. For all these problems, I would suggest how they should
be addressed to make such future online class exchange events more
successful, sustainable, and mutually profitable.

Keywords: arts, online class exchange, synchronous

computermediated communication, telecollaboration, video
conferencing,

INTRODUCTION
In spring 2017 my 3rd-year Film Study seminar students had two web meetings on
Google Hangouts with the Play Performance class students of Dr. Ouda Teda Ena
and Mr. Krisna Septa of Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. When I first met
Dr. Ouda at the ASECCU conference in summer 2016, he told me of his Play
Performance classes, which sounded very fascinating, particularly because his
practice involved not just L2 education but education of (and through) arts. I
suggested that his classes would be a good partner for my Film Study seminar
students’ virtual international class exchange experience, and Dr. Ouda kindly

E-Learning 39
agreed to do something together. Besides our shared interest in arts, the minimal
time difference (Tokyo is 2 hours ahead of Yogyakarta) and the availability of the
common second language (English) were expected to positively motivate and
promote our interaction.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In the history of criticism on the educational use of international SCMC
[Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication], the 2010s seem to be
marking the latest watershed. While the studies on the subject in earlier decades
were mostly concerned with text-based telecollaboration between native
speakers and non-native learners of English (and other target languages) for the
purpose of enhanced language learning, O’Dowd (2016), reporting on an
international conference held in Dublin in 2016, notes some significant new
trends and directions, including “the emergence of video conferencing as an
important tool for online intercultural interaction” (291), “the shift of focus from
language learning to culture-and-language learning” (293), and the growth of
“lingua franca exchange” approach (296) in which non-native partners (as against
nonnative speakers paired with native speakers) use English as a currency in
today’s globalizing world. It is encouraging to find our project locatable in these
latest critical contexts.

Another study that encourages our project, especially after encountering a

number of unexpected difficulties in the first exchange experience, is O’Dowd
and Ritter (2006) who say, “it is by now well established that telecollaborative
exchange frequently end in ‘failed communication’ and do not automatically
bring about successful negotiation of meaning between the learners” (623). They
suggest 10 different fail factors at 4 different levels. They list them, not because
they are to be avoided or eradicated, but because they are precisely the
“cultural rich-points that we want our students to explore” (Belz, 2003, ctd. in
O’Dowd and Ritter, 2006, 639).

It may be argued that students should not be unguardedly exposed to such fail
zones, however culturally rich, but teachers who organize virtual intercultural
exchange events should be prepared to recognize such fail factors and plan
proactively in such ways that only teachers can do. The teachers’ professional
responsibility includes the recognition of “institutional fault lines” in whose
exploration the teachers involved should become “intercultural learners” (Belz
& Müller-Hartmann, 2003).

40 E-Learning
METHODS
In this report I will describe how we prepared and realized the two web meeting
events, what were the gains and fails of the experience from my point of view.
In examining the causes of apparent fails, I will refer to the above-mentioned
O’Dowd & Ritter (2006) as a frame of reference. Because the project is still in
the fledging stage, how we can improve and develop our virtual class exchange
project is the most important consideration. As the first move of the intercultural
learning teachers’ renewed dialogue, I will conclude this report by offering some
suggestions for the future. It is to be followed up by Dr. Ouda later this year in a
paper to be read in Yogyakarta.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

In preparation for the first web meeting event, Dr. Ouda and I started to contact
each other in late January. We informed each other about the contents and
schedules of our individual courses, and what our students might be interested
to do on the online class exchange.

Through our email correspondence I learned that Dr. Ouda was going to pick up
six one-act comedies written in or translated to English, such as Percival Wilde’s
The Sequel and Anton Chekhov’s The Proposal, to be produced by six student
groups of his and Mr. Krisna’s classes. Their course was to conclude with the
public performance of the students’ plays. In my turn, I informed Dr. Ouda that I
was going to pick up a number of short films on Viddsee.com that were made by
mainly Asian independent filmmakers. We were to study the films, compare
them, and produce students’ own films inspired by the works they studied. With
the interaction with Indonesian students in view, I had chosen a number of works
by Indonesian and Japanese filmmakers.

For the course calendar, I learned that Dr. Ouda’s Friday class and Mr. Kristna’s
Wednesday class were scheduled to start in mid-February and end in late-May or
early June. This revealed our first institutional fault line, for my seminar was
scheduled to start in early April and end in late July. As Figure 1 shows, there is
only a little more than two months’ overlap. What is more, our school has the

E-Learning 41
“Golden Week” holidays from late April to early May, so it is only after the
holidays that my seminar students are expected to get used to the coursework,
to say nothing of getting ready for the online class exchange. The first online
meeting has to be set definitely after the Golden Week holidays.

Eventually, the date for the first web meeting was set on Friday, May 12, 2017.
There was, however, another institutional fault line to be negotiated. It was lucky
that both Dr. Ouda’s class and my class fell on Fridays, but our class periods did
not overlap. While my seminar started at 13:30 and ended at 15:00 Japan Time,
Dr. Ouda’s class started at 14:00 and ended at 16:30 Jakarta Time, that is from
16:00 to 18:30 Japan Time (Figure 2):

Figure 2. Unparallel class periods

As it proved that Dr. Ouda’s class had no other option, I asked my seminar
students about their availability of the 5th period that did overlap with Dr. Ouda’s
class. None had the 5th period class to attend, but not a few of them had previous
engagement, including part-time jobs. However, all but one managed to change
their schedules and joined the web meeting.

Because this was going to be the very first time for both of us to do this kind of
international online class exchange, Dr. Ouda and I agreed to make no rush and
organize the event in a relaxed way. Before anything, students would like to
simply get to know each other and introduce what they are working on. As the
web meeting day approached, Dr. Ouda and I made a couple of prearrangements
to help our students get to know each other. First is to exchange the snapshots
of our classes. Second is to assign student MCs on both sides. In the last minute
chat with Dr. Ouda, I learned that his student MCs had a number of questions
ready, so we decided that we leave the Indonesian students to lead the exchange
event. Third is to ask Dr. Ouda if some of his students could make selfie videos
to tell what they had been doing so far. Eight of his students, all belonging to the
same group working on the play The Sequel, created individual self-introduction

42 E-Learning
videos. Unfortunately I received the videos so shortly before the first
webmeeting that my students had no time to watch them in advance.

The first moment of meeting each other online was hilarious, and that is the
beauty of web-cam based, as against text-based SCMC. By simply waving hands
and calling “hello” to each other, both groups of students sent positive signs of
their willingness to be on the same page. As the event proceeded, however, I
soon came to realize that there was a third fault line in this international
exchange. My Japanese students’ skills and style of communication in English
evidently fell out of tune with their Indonesian partners. While the Indonesian
students consistently spoke and responded actively, full of verbal and nonverbal
expressions, my students sat quietly and almost always fell quieter before
speaking and responding, when they managed to respond at all. In fact they
frequently “froze” and left many questions unanswered. To be sure, when they
were asked what they had been doing in class, they had not much to tell because
my class had met only three times by then, but even when they were asked such
questions as “what is it like to study at a women-only school?,” “what do you do
beside your school work?,” “what is your hobby? What do you think of Korean
movies?,” my students lost all these conversation cues and failed to respond.
When the one hour meeting ended, many of my students said they were sorry,
and I felt sorry for them and for Dr. Ouda and his students. When Dr. Ouda wrote
to me soon after to tell that his students wanted to meet us again, I felt heartily
relieved and encouraged.

So we arranged to meet online again two weeks later on June 2. In view of the
second meeting, Dr. Ouda and I made another arrangement. Because this was our
second meeting, we thought we might go deeper than the first meeting and talk
about our subjects of study. Dr. Ouda was kind enough to get his students involved
in the Viddsee videos by choosing three videos, asking his students which they
liked best and why, as well as asking about the difference between play
performance art and film art. I added the three videos in my seminar’s study
assignments and had a class discussion on the difference between the two arts.
Unfortunately, only one of my seminar students said she could attend this time,
but I had a list of comments and questions of all the other students about Dr.
Ouda’s Viddsee-related assignments, as well as about the 8 Indonesian students’
selfie videos we had received earlier and had watched by then. The list of all my
seminar students’ comments and questions were written down on the whiteboard
of the web conference room, to be consulted as appropriate by the single student
who represented my seminar on the meeting day.

E-Learning 43
The above arrangement, however, was thwarted by another unexpected fault
line, the technical failure that happened on June 2. When we met a week later,
Dr. Ouda and Mr. Krisna’s classes had already ended, so they recruited seven
volunteer students (with the promise of a treat of pizza after the meeting). It
proved that the students Dr. Ouda gave the Viddsee-related assignments were
not among them, nor were the students of The Sequel group who created the
selfie videos. So we eventually spent most of the hour listening to the Indonesian
students talk about their final public performance, and asking questions about
it. Although the Japanese student (and a friend of hers she invited to join)
listened most of the time, they were good listeners, voluntarily asked some good
questions, and we did have a rapport we missed on the first meeting. Unlike the
first meeting Dr. Ouda and I positively intervened this time, and that also added
to the rapport. While apologizing for the absence of those students who did the
Viddsee assignments, Dr. Ouda kindly answered my student’s question about
traditional Javanese banana cake, nagasari, which was one of the film titles my
seminar students had watched and discussed. For the Indonesian students, they
spoke and responded as actively as the last time, and I also noted a few more
points to prove they are good communicators. When asked about their costume
in their public play performance, one of the students voluntarily took out his
smartphone, opened the photo gallery, and turning the monitor towards the
webcam as he selected this picture and that, answered the question very
effectively. It may be a matter of course for him to use multiple media in this
way, but to us he looked very smart. Their teamwork also impressed us. When
any of them happened to be at a loss to come up with the right word to say, the
others always gave a friendly support, so there was apparently no fear of
“freezing.”

Although neither of the two web meetings proceeded as I had foreseen, the
experience taught me and my students a number of good things we would never
have learned otherwise. First of all, we were very much impressed by the
Indonesian students’ high communication skills. It includes a good command of
English, of course, and the credit goes to the efficient English Language
Education Study Program of Dr. Ouda and his colleagues that endows the students
the ease and confidence to speak English. What’s even more remarkable is their
active and lively communication style in which they are not only good speakers
individually but know how to help each other and enjoy creating the
conversational rapport together. Last but not least, we were very much
impressed by the confidence with which they can talk about what they have been
doing, in- and off-class. It also proves that the English Language Education Study

44 E-Learning
Program of Sanata Dharma Unversity is successful not simply as an L2 education
program per se but in empowering students to speak and act as active agents in
society with a solid awareness of their mission. I particularly remember the selfie
video of a student who said, “if some day I will be a teacher and my students
have an opportunity to show a drama, I absolutely can help them to prepare it
because I have experiences of a drama.”

Figure 3. “Inventory of Reasons for Failed Communication in Telecollaborative Projects”

(O’Dowd & Ritter, 2006)

Having mentioned the major gains we had with the synchronous international
class exchange with Indonesian students, I would like to identify a number of
fault lines that led to apparent fails in the first two web meeting events and
consider how to plan for the future proactively. The first and most difficult
obstacle was definitely “the misalignment of academic calendars” of the two
schools that constitutes the very basic “institutional fault line” (Belz & Müller-
Hartmann, 2003). In O’Dowd & Ritter’s table of the “Reasons for Failed
Communication” (Figure 3), the obstacle is to be located in the
“socioinstitutional” difference of the two schools’ “(9) General organization of
course of study.” For the difference of class periods (see Figure 2 above), I will
probably be able to move my seminar to the 5th period to make it overlap with
Dr. Ouda’s class, but that would not solve the more basic problem of the
“unparallel semester periods”

E-Learning 45
(see Figure 1 above). Because they cannot be changed arbitrarily by individual
teachers, the limitation will remain to condition both the number of times we
can meet (3 times at most) and the amount of things my students, as late
starters, can show and tell about their own class activities. One suggested
scenario for better future meetings would be for Dr. Ouda and I to develop a
shared “(4) task design (thematic content, sequencing)” that keeps our students
engaged in a more focused and equally sharable tasks. For example, Dr. Ouda
may choose a couple of short scenes from his students’ plays for my seminar
students to practice for a couple of weeks before the meeting, and on the
meeting day, the Indonesian student directors and players who have been
working on those plays may want to comment, demonstrate and coach my
students. In return, I (and Dr. Ouda) may choose a couple of Viddsee videos for
both Indonesian and Japanese students to study and discuss beforehand, and on
the web meeting we may exchange our opinions about the stories, cultural
backgrounds (Indonesian, Japanese, or any other country’s), acting,
camerawork, etc.

Added to the imbalance on the socioinstitutional level, the difference in the “(1)
Learner’s current level of ICC [Inter Cultural Communication]” proved to be an
equally marked fault line, as the moments of my students’ “freezing” typically
demonstrates. To be sure, on the “individual level” some of my students have
very low competency in English, including one who, after attending the first web
meeting, said she couldn’t understand the questions Indonesian students were
asking. However, it is also true that most of my students, including those who
have relatively high skills in English, did understand the questions but simply
didn’t know how to respond in English on the spot. If they did not understand the
questions, they could at least have been taught what to say in such a case, but
if they did understand the questions, how can they be encouraged to express
themselves and remain on the same page with their conversation partners? As
O’Dowd & Ritter argue, failure comes from “a combination of interconnected
factors” (625), so the solution may not come easily. However, I would rather stay
optimistic, because it is thanks to the international exchange that I, as a teacher,
became aware of a number of weaknesses in my education style and method on
“individual,” “class” and “socioinstitutional” levels and came to realize the urge
to improve them. For my students, I simply trust them, believing if they are given
tasks more focused than this time and given opportunities to try and practice in
advance saying what they want to say, and if they are eventually exposed to and
involved in the positively communication-friendly “(6) Local group dynamics” of

46 E-Learning
Indonesian students on the web meeting, they will have a much better chance of
proving themselves.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

While Dr. Ouda and I kept corresponding to each other before the web meetings,
the results were not (and in some points not so good) as we had expected. It
reveals the sober reality that keeping a good “(8) teacher-teacher relationship”
does not necessarily promise a good result. Apparently, as “teacher-learners,”
we should keep watching out for all possible fault lines and keep discussing them.
The suggestions I made here may or may not be endorsed by Dr. Ouda, but this
review from my side of the fault lines would have opened up things that cannot
be adequately communicated through email. I hope this starts our renewed
dialogue for an even more exciting future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank Dr. Ouda Teda Ena and Mr. Krisna Septa of Sanata Dharma
University, Indonesia, for their sustained good-will in realizing our international
online collaboration. I would also thank Dr. Cecilia T. Murniati and Dr. Ridwan
Sanjaya of Soegijapranata Catholic University, Indonesia, for their earlier
communications about possible online exchange projects with us, and for giving
me this opportunity to speak at the ICLT 2017 conference.

REFERENCE

Belz, J. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in

telecollaboration. Language learning & technology, 7 (2), 68-99. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/BELZ/default.html

Belz, Julie A., & Müller-Hartmann, Andreas. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners:
negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. The
Modern language journal, 87(1), 71-89.

Farr, Fiona, & Murray, Liam (Eds.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of language learning
and technology. New York, NY: Routledge.

E-Learning 47
O’Dowd, Robert. (2016). Emerging trends and new directions in telecollaborative
learning. CALICO journal, 33(3), 291-310.

---, & Ritter, Markus. (2006). Understanding and working with “failed
communication” in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO journal, 23(3),
623-42.

48 E-Learning
 Socio-cultural perspectives of a Virtual Learning
Environment through Schoolbook:
The De La Salle University - Dasmarinas, Cavite,
Philippine experience

Luis Carmelo Buenaventura, PhD

How do families keep track of their sons and daughters academic performance
including attendance records accurately in a Virtual Learning Environment?
Furthermore, how do the students know their class standings and grades for the
Prelims, Midterms, and Finals immediately without meeting the teacher on a
face-to-face basis? Since the full scale implementation of the Schoolbook by De
La Salle University - Dasmarinas, Cavite, Philippines last 2010, the college faculty
were initially encouraged by the school administrators to utilize the e-learning
portal on a full-time basis to enhance their teaching insofar as it saved time and
resources; not to mention, paper. At the beginning, the faculty who were not
tech savvy viewed Schoolbook as a remake or extension of Facebook. However,
upon close scrutiny with proper training and orientation by the people of the
Center for Innovative Learning Programs (CILP) of the aforementioned
institution, many other faculty members coming from different departments
were enlightened to realize that Schoolbook, indeed, had a lot to offer in terms
of academic achievements, enhancement, and research. This paper features a
brief history of utilizing and applying Schoolbook in the De La Salle University
Dasmarinas, Cavite setting. Essentially, it includes the advantages and
disadvantages of the portal in teaching, learning, and research among college
faculty, students, and their parents as well. Future prospects of applying the
Schoolbook portal in other aspects of social and cultural communication will also
be discussed.

OVERVIEW OF THE ACADEMIC YEAR AT DE LA SALLE UNIVERSITY

DASMARIÑAS, CAVITE, PHILIPPINES: A Reality Check
The Philippine academic year begins in August and lasts until December for the
first semester while the second semester begins in January and lasts until the
end of May the following year. The summer term begins in June and lasts until

E-Learning 49
the middle of July. In this regard, the first semester has a total of 17 weeks
academic time or 107 class days while the second semester comprises a total of
16 weeks or 104 class days. The second semester is relatively shorter because of
the Christmas break, which begins in the middle of December and lasts until the
second week of January of the New Year. Additionally, the second semester is
affected by the Lenten Observance of the Holy Week, which has become a
religious tradition of the Filipinos to commemorate the Passion, Death, and
Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. The summer term, in turn, covers a total
of 4-5 weeks or 30 class days with 2-hour periods per class where students are
met everyday for a total of two hours each subject. Full-time faculties are
assigned a maximum total of 6 units or four class hours daily from Monday to
Friday during the summer term. On a regular semester basis, full-time faculty
are usually given a total teaching load of 18 units or six subjects of 3 units each
with a provision for an overload of 3 units or 1 subject when the need arises.
Usually during the first semester, most class activities are confined to the
classroom mainly because of heavy rains and floods. July to November is
commonly known as the peak rainy season months when heavy rains, floods, and
typhoons abound over the entire archipelago. Early December until May are
considered the wet to dry-season months where alternative outdoor classroom
activities may be organized. The summer term, however, serves as the most
conducive period to hold outdoor activities or off-classroom activities like field
trips, insofar as the students have relatively more free time to undertake which
is a great to acquire more knowledge from the subjects concerned in a practical
way.

The Pitfalls of the Lecture Method: A Reexamination of the teacher’s

conscience.
The problem with many classes today on the university/collegiate level is that
teaching for most university lecturers and professors mainly involves standing in
front of a lecture hall while reading off notes, based on textbooks and scholarly
journals, while students have truly no desire to read at all. If students opt to
read the books and required readings insofar as they may have been threatened
with a surprise quiz or graded recitation by the teachers concerned, the college
students may obtain little useful knowledge and comprehension out of them since
the language utilized by the authors of such readings is so technical and too high
for them to comprehend. Let’s face it. Most university professors and lecturers
alike consider this method as the easiest to execute and get by with. In fact, it

50 E-Learning
is so easy a method since it provides us with the opportunity to easily kill time
and conduct a monologue without even caring if our students are listening to us
or not at the end of each period. This is the gray area where the important and
active, highly participative and dynamic role of the university professor and/or
lecturer employing creative and innovative methods and strategies are supposed
to come into play so that the lessons become more comprehensible, significant,
relevant and highly meaningful to all students absorbing them.

Through many years of teaching experiences, practical wisdom about varied and
creative/alternative techniques of “lecturing” have been produced. University
professors and lecturers aiming to be effective lecturers are currently required
to be scholars, writers, producers, comedians, entertainers, and animators most
of the time to catch the attention of the students. Essentially, creativity and
innovation of teaching and learning methods do not stop nor remain static even
after a so-called, “successful and fulfilling semester” insofar as this current
generation, the Generation Text, Generation Me, Generation Digital is
concerned, where their attention span is relatively short and easily distracted in
the usual classroom setting. An admission of fact indicates that very few college
professors combine such talents in optimal ways and that even the best that
constantly hope and wish to do their best in class are not always in top form.
After an entire semester of providing the students with the aforementioned
learning tools, the greatest assumption the professors and lecturers predict is
that the students have truly grasped the subject and hopefully found some
significant meaning in their lives and reorganization of their values as well
(McKeachie, 1999:66).

To a large extent, purely lecture-based class sessions throughout an entire

semester are judged as “dry”, “boring” and “monotonous” since retention of
information would be minimal in nature (MacKenzie, Eraut, and Jones, 1976: 38).

This is where alternative teaching and learning strategies through Schoolbook

like group interaction games similar to Kahoot and mini-group discussions enters
the picture as it is believed to play a significant role in the retention of
information and lessons learned from the subjects concerned. Well-planned and
carefully organized teaching strategies offer different challenges including
windows of teaching and learning opportunities for both teacher and student
since such are believed to make a great impact on their lives and values
formation. Moreover, these alternative strategies gradually transform both the
teacher and students into highly active mentors, learners, and leaders insofar as

E-Learning 51
relatively new information and knowledge is generated and acquired far beyond
what have been written in books, journals, including magazine-based feature
articles.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS
This paper put two existing theories in digital education to an initial, exploratory
test, namely, The Sociology of Digital Technology and Education by Selwyn, N and
Facer, K. (2014) for anticipating the culture of resistance to technology for
education and Flow Theory by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi (1996) for teaching and
learning of teachers and students.

Digital Technology and Education.

Digital technology in the form of digital devices such as tablets, laptops, and
smartphones has been part of contemporary education in ways that would have
been hard to imagine even a few years ago. The technology currently supports a
diversity of informal learning practices at home, at work and on the move.
Classrooms and other formal learning environments are saturated with computer
hardware and software where a growing amount of educational work is
conducted on a ‘virtual’ basis. Despite the diversity and complexity of
technologies in use, ‘the digital’ is now an expected but largely unremarkable
feature of the educational landscape. Indeed, digital technologies are such an
integral component of everyday education that ‘the digital’ should not just be
limited to those researchers who have a particular interest in technology, media
and ‘ICT’ but should include a broad concern for all education researchers,
regardless of specialization or background. In addition, it could be argued that
there are growing opportunities for sociologists of education to explore ways of
engaging in the active construction of educational practices and institutions that
reflect, challenge and build upon the wider socio-technical changes of today. So
what lies ahead given the ‘present’ state of the sociology of education and
technology? As the decade of the 2010s progresses into the next, there are
encouraging signs of a large gamut of work in the field of Sociology. Analyses of
digital education are beginning to feature more frequently within the pages of
specialist journals such as the British Journal of the Sociology of Education and
Sociology of Education. Conversely, ‘new media’ scholarship (as shown in

52 E-Learning
journals such as Information Communication & Society and New Media & Society)
is increasingly turning its attention towards educational topics and issues. It is
not surprising to encounter doctoral studies being pursued (and doctorates
awarded) in sociological aspects of education and technology, with specialized
programs in subjects such as ‘Education, Technology & Society’ also thriving at
undergraduate and postgraduate levels. In addition, mainstream educational
technology journals are beginning to feature work that draws directly from the
likes of Foucault (Hope 2013), Bourdieu (Johnson 2009), Bernstein (Player-Koro
2013), Goffman (Davies 2012), Actor Network theory (Wright and Parchoma 2011)
and even Marxist perspectives (Hall 2011).

If these trends continue, then we could well be on the verge of seeing the
sociology of education take the decisive ‘digital turn’. Viewed in this context, a
number of key issues and debates relating to ‘the digital’ continues to develop
within the mainstream sociology of education: Digital technology and the
reconfiguration of space, time, and responsibility. Indeed, the negation of
boundaries lies at the heart of the ideological promises of digital education.
Sociologists have therefore moved on from initial concerns over ‘time-space
compression’ and a ‘death of distance’ to explore the implications of these
changes. In particular, the provision of digital education on an expanded and
accelerated ‘any time, any place, any pace’ basis raises a host of questions
relating to educational engagement and educational governance – not least the
redistribution of responsibilities across different sites and actors (Webster 2013).
Indeed, digital technology is clearly associated with a redistribution of work that
has to be done in delivering educational opportunities, as well as a potential
redistribution of responsibility for educational outcomes that result. In all cases,
digital technologies are seen to be enabling educational engagement regardless
of place, space, or setting.

Nonetheless, some researchers expressed concerns that these technologies might

simply exacerbate forms of individual exploitation. For example, the erosion of
previously clear distinctions between formal and informal learning has raised
issues over the exploitation of individuals who feel increasingly compelled to
engage with education regardless of appropriateness or potential detriment to
other areas of life including securing one’s privacy and identity online. Digital
technologies can be seen to support this compulsion in a number of different
ways (Bulfin and Koutsogiannis 2012). For instance, school students may find the
family becoming reframed or redefined as a site of increased engagement of
schoolwork while outside of school – further increasing what Beck-Gernshiem

E-Learning 53
(1998) describes as the ‘pressure’ placed upon the contemporary family to
educate. Similarly, adults and children alike may find digital technologies further
eliding the social relations of learning and consumption, thus reducing the
available time for what Andre Gorz (2001) refers to as a ‘time for living’.

Flow Theory by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi (1996)

Flow represents one of eight mental states that can happen during the learning
process. In addition to flow, these mental states include anxiety, apathy, arousal,
boredom, control, relaxation, and worry; they result when a learner experiences
a combination of skill and challenge levels of a task in non-optimal combinations.

Flow is the most optimal of these states for learning, as it is where skill level and
challenge level of a task are at their highest. This creates an opportunity for
learning and intense focus, where learners can even feel that they lose track of
time because they become so immersed in the task, perhaps with a lot of thrill
and excitement combined.

In contrast, a learner can experience relaxation in learning a task when their skill
level is very high and the task challenge is very low. Conversely, a learner can
experience anxiety when their skill level is very low and the task challenge is
very high. Neither state is supportive of optimal learning. Note that flow can be
experienced in any task involving any field of activity, from music to writing to
painting to sports.

Essentially, educational researchers try to understand flow in order to help their

students optimize their learning.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY

Data gathering for this paper employed the qualitative research design. Primary
informal interviews through storytelling were conducted with the implementors
and pioneers of Schoolbook who are currently assigned to the Center of
Innovative Learning Programs (CILP). Informal interviews through narratives
were also conducted with teachers from different departments of the total seven
colleges of De La Salle University - Dasmarinas, Cavite who were perceived to
actively use Schoolbook in their classes. College students under the care and
supervision of this researcher over the past two school years (2015 - 2016 and
2016 - 2017) were informally interviewed through storytelling shortly before the

54 E-Learning
end of each semester. The questions asked for both parties –teachers and
students - were summarized into two categories: The Advantages or Benefits of
Schoolbook and the Disadvantages or Pitfalls of Schoolbook. The respondents
were requested to freely share their thoughts and opinions about their teaching
and learning experiences with Schoolbook during a one-hour period. Insofar as
the parents were originally included in this study, at the time of this writing, only
62 parents were registered as parental accounts in Schoolbook; no parent was,
however, available for comment and interview because most of them were based
abroad and busy earning for the tuition of their children. Some students whose
parents closely monitor their sons or daughters academic progress via the Grade
book of Schoolbook shared a limited view, which the study used for analyzing the
parent’s point of view. Since the paper has limited space, the best responses
from both teachers and students, which could highlight the majority of
respondents, were lumped into one to two responses per category. In other
words, one to two teachers or students responses could already represent at least
ten to twenty respondents’ comments and opinions as regards advantages and
disadvantages of Schoolbook.

ENTER SCHOOLBOOK: THE E-LEARNING PORTAL OF DE LA SALLE

UNIVERSITY – DASMARINAS, CAVITE

A. Humble Beginnings
Since 2010, Ms. Arlene Roa Awayan, a full-time faculty member of the Marketing
Department of the College of Business Administration and Accountancy (CBAA)
decided to embark on a project which simplifies the effective delivery of
teaching materials to both faculty and students initially of the departments –
Marketing and Management. In due time, Ms. Awayan was able to recruit a
colleague by the name of Ms. Jennifer Padernal of the Business Management
Department to join her with the same project. In this regard, both personalities
began to orient themselves with Schoolbook, which was introduced by a private
Information Technology company devoted to Education known as NEO LMS
PHILIPPINES based in Makati City, Metro Manila. Since the trend at that time was
to incorporate e learning in the university curriculum, some faculty members
from other colleges and departments gradually expressed interest to incorporate
the e-learning structure in delivering their lessons promptly and effectively. In

E-Learning 55
this regard, the concept was presented to the university administrators for
strategic planning and review.

The years 2010 to 2012 saw Schoolbook with mixed reactions from the academic
community. Some were open-minded while others were not. Those who were
labeled anti-technology believed that it was just a waste of time and financial
resources since educational materials may be shared to the students via
Powerpoint presentations and that the grades may be encoded and later on
shared with the students themselves using MS-Excel. Moreover, some faculty even
believed that Schoolbook might have simply been an extension of the existing
popular social media site – Facebook. For the broad-minded individuals, they
were simply going to give everything a try. Such comments and criticisms did
not, however, stop the two personalities, Awayan and Padernal from pursuing
their goals and spearheading a project for the academic community. In fact,
they did not even have an office, which they could truly call a Learning Center
committed to Educational Technology. Both persisted and moved on and by 2013,
the academic community gradually began to take a closer look at the benefits of
Schoolbook.

By that time, the Educational Technology Center (ETC) of De La Salle University

- Dasmarinas, Cavite evolved which later on became the Center for Innovative
Learning Programs (CILP). Both personalities – Awayan and Padernal – took the
initiative then to commence and continue training with Schoolbook, which would
eventually be adopted by the academic community to simplify tasks, upload
resources, conduct online activities, and submit grades more efficiently than
ever before. Subsequently, the organization grew and recruited more faculty
members and staff into the CILP. Today, the office conducts Levels 1 to 3
trainings for all interested faculty members. A recent order from the
administrators then compelled all faculty members to utilize the electronic grade
sheet provided by Schoolbook – the Gradebook – so that both parents and students
could instantly monitor their class standings from the beginning towards the end
of the semester (Ruben, 2017).

B. What is Schoolbook?
Schoolbook is the institution’s E-Learning Portal introduced by NEO LMS
PHILIPPINES, which introduces the Virtual Learning Environment or VLE for the
entire academic community. In this Virtual Learning Environment, Schoolbook
enriches learning experiences by strengthening teacher-student including

56 E-Learning
student-student exchanges and relationships beyond the classroom. Through
Schoolbook, the University intends to build and nurture an online community of
lifelong learners. The portal apparently offers two types of online learning – Self-
paced and Blended.

Self-paced implies that the teachers simply upload all their lessons, usually in
PowerPoint format, for their students’ reference and comprehension. In this
mode, the lecture method is mainly used because the uploaded lessons are
merely repeated in the classroom. For Self-Paced mode, both teachers and
students conduct minimal work online since the students are left to themselves
to learn and study the uploaded lessons on their own. Blended Learning, for its
part, offers two types of course delivery modes: Web-presence and Web-
enhanced. For the first mode, Web-presence, is a course delivery mode where
the class is largely conducted using face-to-face sessions. The E-class enables
teachers and students to utilize the portal as a communication and resource-
sharing tool through the use of announcements, news features, messages,
educational links and submission of assignments. Web-enhanced, on the other
hand, is a course delivery type conducted on a blended mode where both
teachers and students meet fifty-percent online and another fifty-percent in the
classroom. The faculty meets the students inside the classroom once a week and
prepares weekly online learning activities. Most outputs like quizzes and
individual/group discussions are administered online as students are immediately
graded for their submitted works. The teachers intending to conduct blended
classes for the entire semester are initially required to undertake and complete
level 3 training provided by the Center for Innovative Learning Programs (CILP).
Only those faculty members who have been certified will be allowed to conduct
web-enhanced courses. The course calendar must contain the following: Online
Learning Activities for each topic and specific schedule of online and face-to-
face sessions. The required document is attached to the course syllabus where
they have to be approved by their respective chairs and college deans each
semester. In turn, the Center for Innovative Learning Programs (CILP) must be
provided with a copy of each college faculty’s Schoolbook Course Calendar for
proper monitoring (Padernal, 2016)

E-Learning 57
C. Advantages of Schoolbook from the Teacher’s and Student’s
Perspective
Admittedly, some teachers were initially resistant in using the educational portal
but after moments of exposure especially with their colleagues in their
respective departments using Schoolbook, many of them became enlightened
and engrossed in uploading lessons and assessments. Note that their responses
support the Flow Theory of Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, one expert in the Psychology
of Learning.

A Business Management teacher discloses:

“At first, I thought using Schoolbook was hard and complicated, but after being
taught how to use the portal effectively, I realized that it was just so easy and
that my students could understand the lessons well. Many times I become
engrossed and excited in using Schoolbook. In the past, I was compelled to repeat
the lessons in class after lecturing, but now with Schoolbook, it is not necessary
to repeat because “lecture time” is now spent with the students asking questions
for clarification. Now, I am not worried if my students will pass or fail their major
exams. Thanks to Schoolbook, everything has been simplified and made easy for
teacher and students to learn effectively.”

A History Teacher explains:

“Schoolbook at the beginning was tedious and rather taxing for me because I had
to upload all my lessons and assessments. But after going through Module 3
Training, I realized that the lessons including assessments previously uploaded
could be reused in the following semesters. Now I can do a lot of multi-taskings
since I am able to work from home. The Schoolbook operations make it a breeze
for me because I can easily check the submitted works of my students. So I can
spend half of the time in school and half of the time with my family at home
without sacrificing quality time for my students needs. And guess what? I can
even do my laundry! My time in school and the home is maximized as well!”

From the student’s perspective, since he is a Management Accounting major and

has a lot of paperwork to accomplish in his major subjects, he welcomes the use
of Schoolbook especially in completing requirements for his other General
Education courses like Sociology:

58 E-Learning
“At the beginning, I thought that Schoolbook was an extension of Facebook where
you could meet new people on campus and chat with your classmates…. but when
our subject teacher required us to use it for his subject, I realized that everything
became simpler and more efficient. I became so engrossed in working on the
assignments that many times, I lost track of time. Practically most of our short
and long quizzes including assignments like group discussions could be submitted
online and immediately graded. My parents are likewise happy to view my
academic progress immediately since they could see my grades instantly. With
subjects needing improvement, I am encouraged to work harder and comply with
the standard since I would immediately know if I am doing well or not in that
subject using Schoolbook.”

D. Disadvantages of using Schoolbook

Supporting the tenets of Selwyn and Facer (2014) as regards changes in work etic
and taskings including family relationships among parents and students utilizing
educational technology, the following accounts have been shared by some faculty
members and students.

For one who is not so technologically knowledgeable, Schoolbook for this teacher
delays his delivery of the lessons including the submission of grades for his
students. A General Education teacher discloses:

“I’m not so Tech Savvy with laptops and desktops! Moreover, I am only using
Powerpoint to deliver my lessons and I believe that is enough. To upload my
lessons in Schoolbook makes it more complicated and slower for me. And to
encode the grades in Gradebook makes it more challenging for me. In fact, I’m
not so good yet in using Powerpoint to make my lessons more interesting, so to
speak. I still continue to utilize the lecture method and write my lessons on the
whiteboard using a whiteboard marker. Nonetheless, I will have to learn how to
use Schoolbook but it will definitely take time.”

Another General Education teacher shares the same view and adds that
Schoolbook may be distracting to both teacher and student while the lessons are
delivered and explained:

“Schoolbook does not guarantee that the lessons will be delivered effectively.
Many times I have observed my students to be lazy and not listening to my
explanation since they are confident that the lessons will be uploaded in the
portal anyway. In this regard, to catch their attention, I resort to the traditional
method of lecturing. Schoolbook for my subject will only be used to encode their

E-Learning 59
grades for the Prelims, Midterms, and Finals so they will know how they stand in
my class.”

And for a Sophomore Engineering student who has been familiar with Schoolbook,
shares this observation:

“I’m so relaxed using Schoolbook because I can take my time doing my

assignments and answering my online quizzes. Sometimes, so relaxed, I suddenly
realized it is very close to the deadline that I hardly have time to complete. I
also realized that my laziness pays off because of this Schoolbook thinking our
teacher could extend the deadline, but to no avail. Now my parents get mad at
me because they can instantly see from the Gradebook if I am doing well in all
subjects or not. Before I could lie to them and assure them that all is well with
me. I am passing in all subjects, so they think. But not anymore because I can
easily get caught lying to my parents about my real academic standing!”

CONCLUSIONS

From the insights shared by the aforementioned respondents, the following

conclusions may be gleaned:

1. Despite a relatively strong cultural resistance towards utilizing

Schoolbook, the educational portal is here to stay and remain in the university
for at least 10 years or more largely shifting and changing teaching, learning, and
work styles.

2. Even if there are negative reactions towards using Schoolbook at this

moment in time by some faculty and students, this researcher believes that
Schoolbook will continue to flourish since the benefits and positive effects largely
outweigh the negative reactions towards its use in the community.

3. Somehow those individuals who were initially resistant, will learn to see
the usefulness and efficiency of the portal in its implementation. It will just be
a matter of, say, two more years from the time of this writing, where more
people will be using Schoolbook in their everyday lives.

4. There may be a change of teaching, learning, and working styles

especially in the next five years which may prove to be beneficial to De La Salle
University Dasmarinas – Cavite’s ecology. Imagine the multiplier effect wherein

60 E-Learning
faculty and students will only spend half of their time on campus and half of their
time at home completing academic requirements? Won’t Schoolbook be one of
the concrete measures to save the environment because less fossil fuels have
been burned or consumed for a week?

5. The mission to continue the use of Schoolbook should have a sense of

political will and support not only from people assigned to the Center for
Innovative Learning Programs (CILP) but from the central administrators who
should remain open minded as well. All members of the academic community
should realize that Schoolbook is but one online educational tool that provides
current teachers and students with the vision and structure of a classroom of the
future.

REFERENCES

Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998) “On the way to a post-familial family” Theory Culture

and Society, 15, 3- 4, pp.53-70

Bulfin, S. and Koutsogiannis, D. (2012) “New literacies as multiply placed

practices: expanding perspectives on young people’s literacies across home
and school” Language and Education 26, 4, pp. 331-346.

Csíkszentmihályi, Mihály (1996) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience.

New York: Harper Perennial. Pp. 1-163

Davies, J. (2012) “Facework on Facebook as a new literacy practice” Computers

& Education 59, 19- 29

Gorz, A. (2001) ‘Critique of economic reason”in Munck, R. and Waterman, P. (eds)

Labour worldwide Basingstoke, Macmillan

Hall, R. (2011) “Revealing the transformatory moment of learning technology:

The place of critical social theory” ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology,
19, 3, pp. 273-284

Hope, A. (2013) Foucault, Panopticism and School Surveillance Research. In M.

Murphy (Ed.) Social Theory and Educational Research. London: Routledge.
pp 35-51

E-Learning 61
Johnson, N. (2009) “Teenage technological experts views of schooling” Australian
Educational Researcher 36, 1, 59-72

McKeachie, W. (1999). Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for

College and University Teachers. New York. Houghton Mifflin Company.

MacKenzie, N. et. al. (1976). Teaching and Learning: An Introduction to New

Methods and Resources in Higher Education. Paris. The Unesco Press and
the International Association of Universities.

Player-Koro, C. (2013) “Hype, hope and ICT in teacher education: a Bernsteinian

perspective” Learning, Media and Technology, 38, 1, pp. 26-40

Selwyn, N., & Facer, K. (2014). The sociology of education and digital technology:
Past, Present and Future. Oxford Review of Education, 40(4), 482-496.
Webster, A. (2013) “Digital technology and sociological windows” in Prior, N.
and Kate Orton-Johnson, K. (eds) ‘Digital sociology’ Basingstoke, Palgrave
(pp.227-233)

Wright, S. and Parchoma, G. (2011) “Technologies for learning? An actor-network

theory critique of affordances in research on mobile learning” in Research
in Learning Technology 19, 3, pp.247–258

PERSONAL COMMUNICATION:
Jen Padernal – Proponent and pioneer of Schoolbook – Schoolyear 2016-2017

Roland Ruben – Current Director of the Center for Innovative Learning Programs
(CILP) of De La Salle University - Dasmarinas, Cavite. Schoolyear 2016-2017

62 E-Learning
 Infrastructure Readiness and Human Resources in
the Implementation of E-learning
Albertus Dwiyoga Widiantoro

ABSTRACT

E-learning is delivered digitally, internet-based network, which is

expected to be done online, realtime, and also remotely. The
Government of Indonesia has opened the opportunity for universities
to implement E-learning with certain criteria aimed at improving the
quality and relevance of higher education and industry innovation.
Terms of Distance Education Program organizer is an A accredited
study program. with accreditation A study program can organize
distance education courses in Indonesia and internationally. This
paper will present whether the accredited A University is ready and
capable in infrastructure to implement E-learning.

Keywords: E-learning, E-learning Infrastructure, Digitally, Internet

Network, Accredited University

INTRODUCTION
e-learning is a learning process that uses information technology. Information
Technology in this case is computer (in the form of software and hardware) and
internet. Where the learning process combines classroom learning and
onlinebased, as well as total-based online learning. the use of e-learning in
learning is a trend of learning model because with online learning, more and
more people who follow it.

The development of information technology such as social media, blogs, videos,

podcasts, vlogs, and wikis is currently growing very fast, used easily, and widely
used for communication to support the learning process.

E-Learning 63
The Indonesian government is also utilizing internet technology for e-learning
that is used for distance education. Distance education is a process of teaching
and learning that is done remotely using various communication media with the
aim of providing high education services to the community who can not follow
the education face to face or regular and expand access to facilitate the service
of higher education in education and learning.

In building e-learning it takes something that is software, hardware, internet

network, human resources, and policy. These five components should be a
priority if you want e-learning to run well. The selection of good infrastructure
is how the needs of the five components are available with enough, then e-
learning services to be optimal.

In this research will discuss whether the university who get accreditation A in
Central Java can carry out e-learning education well, so it can help the
government in distance education by looking at the readiness of its own
infrastructure.

LITERATURE REVIEW
E-learning is a learning process that uses information technology (Chox, 2012).
The use of technology to complement traditional teaching practices so that e-
learning is done without location and time constraints (Richardson, 2003).

E-learning is a process of learning that is delivered digitally, internet-based. In

terms of time, E-learning can be done in realtime and online and also remotely.
In the classroom settings supported by e-learning can be done flexibly because
ICTbased learning can be done individually, independently, based on the
community (Markus, 2008).

According to Law no. 12/2012, Distance education is a process of teaching and

learning that is done in a distant way using various communication media with
the aim of providing higher education services to community groups who can not
attend regular or regular education and expand access and facilitate higher
education services in education and Learning (Law, 2012). Strengthened by
education and cultural minister’s regulation that distance education is a process
of teaching and learning that is done remotely through the use of various
communication media (Government Regulation, 2013)

64 E-Learning
Indonesia has opened up opportunities for universities to conduct distance
education with certain criteria aimed at improving the quality and relevance of
higher education and industry innovation; improve access to higher education;
increase the GER of higher education (Gross Participation Rate: The proportion
of school children at a certain level in the age group corresponding to that level
of education); Equitable distribution of affordable and flexible education of
space and time.

In the Distance Education program, the availability of Information and

Communication technology of the organizers as well as in the Distance Learning
Resource Unit (USBJJ) and its connectivity is very important and irreplaceable.
If the organizing college does not have adequate information and communication
technology tools on campus, then distance education programs can not be
implemented. The provision of information and communication technology
devices for students may be done through cooperation (with contract documents
binding both parties during the course of learning) with partner institutions, such
as local universities, or computer courses, etc (RISTEKDIKTI, 2016).

Terms of the implementation of distance education program is a study program

that get accredited A can organize distance education courses in Indonesia and
internationally. accredited B study programs are only allowed in 3 provinces in
the territory of Indonesia [RISTEKDIKTI, 2016]. Principles of ICT utilization in
learning as follows:

Table 1. Principles of ICT utilization in learning

Principle Description Type

0% Full face-to-face, learning with print or Tradi�onal face to face

oral material

1%-29% Using internet technology to facilitate Web-enhanced

face-to-face patterns, perhaps using an Learning is enriched
LMS or website to post teaching materials with internet access
and tasks
30%-70% Combines online and face-to-face ways. Blended/hybrid e-
There is a proportion of online teaching learning
materials delivered. Usually comes with
online discussions, and there is a reduction
of face-to-face frequency

E-Learning 65
 >80% Most or all of the teaching materials are Fully online
delivered online, without a portion of elearning
faceto-face
The development of learning now also appears mobile learning which is a join of
mobile technology and e-Learning. The mobile aspect in learning makes it
different from other learning, especially designing the learning experience by
utilizing the ‘mobility’ service. M-Learning focuses on the mobility of learners,
interacting with portable technology.

Information Technology is a computer (in the form of software and hardware) and
internet. Where the learning process can combine learning in the classroom and
online-based, as well as online-based total. E-learning is a trend of current
learning models and the great attention of learning using this model.

The development of information technology in learning is very fast and easy to

use. Technologies such as social media, blogs, videos, podcasts, vlogs, and wikis
are widely used for communication to support the learning process. This
technology can also be integrated with existing e-learning system to form an
integrated system.

E-learning can be built at their own expense, rented, can also use cloud
technology. By developing their own procurement of hardware, software,
experts, network, space then the financing should be borne alone. While the
rental system is enough to rent with a certain capacity to the vendor. If the
University uses an e-learning system using technology coud the cost of building,
maintaining, borne by the vendor. With this model IT staff to keep the server
maintained 24 hours by vendors. Cloud technology for e-learning can reduce the
budget needs of hardware, electricity and server space. The linkage between
physical infrastructure affects lecturer performance. The availability of
complete equipment makes scientists proud of the university and performs
well[11].

The e-learning system must keep abreast of technological developments and the
demands of society, to develop e-learning using the concept of cloud computing
can be easily implemented. But cost and risk management affect how e-learning
management solutions are based on cloud computing[12].

Limited availability source of funding of Private University to support technology

transfer activities is a major obstacle to the commercialization of university

66 E-Learning
technology effectively. In Indonesia has the same problem that funding at private
universities is still very dependent on the growth of students.

The e-learning infrastructure consists of hardware, software, and human

resources. Hardware consists of server type, database, user, bandwidth, memory
(RAM), and operating system. Software in this case is a tool used for e-leraning
of Learning Management System software. Resources are experts who can
prepare, install and run hardware, software[14].

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
In this study using several stages as follows:

1. Looking for A accredited college: In this search we use data of National

Accreditation Board of Higher Education

2. Choosing a college located in Central Java: Look for all websites owned by
accredited A college to explore information about e-learning that is owned
and implemented.

3. Explore information on infrastructure owned by universities: This process

looks for information on what infrastructure is owned and utilized for e-
learning services. Infrastructure being excavated is network, server, internet
service.

4. Analysis: After searching for all e-learning services the process then analyzes
whether the service is appropriate for e-lending required by the government.

5. Conclusions: Conclude e-learning services owned by the needs and demands

of e-learning implementation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSION

The process of choosing a college with accreditation A by doing a search on the
website authorized to issue a predicate of accreditation of the Institute of
National Accreditation Board of Higher Education (BAN PT) with the address
https://banpt.or.id, as shown in the picture below.

E-Learning 67
By using the website of BANPT, 3 private universities in Central Java have
accreditation of rank A institution which is the best or highest rank in Indonesia.

Research by way of searching based on college owned websites, whether there is

a website that manages about e-learning. By doing an analysis of the existing in
the three universities found that the implementation of e-learning is strongly
supported by leaders of universities in line with the government. Utilization of
e-learning technology is mature enough has started more than 4 years. But not
all study programs use e-learning optimally, only limited to uploading lecture
material and syllabus. Optimizing the utilization of e-learning for distance
education is only one college that has implemented distance education.
Support
leaders start Distance
University Staf IT Unit development Users
university years learning

X1 Less supported University Library >4 anny No

department

X2 enaugh supported Centre Technical >8 Anny No

implementation department
unit

X3 enaugh supported Centre Technical >5 Anny Yes

implementation department
unit

infrastructure development is done by gradually is the procurement of servers,

internal network, and bandwidth because it requires high cost. With the increase
of study programs that use e-learning then the process needs and server speed
increases. The addition of bandwidth is influenced by several factors: the number
of users increases, the larger the multimedia size the larger, the laptop and
mobile devices the higher the speed, also the need to access data abroad. The
need for data IX (international exchange) is higher due to the many materials

68 E-Learning
available. The addition of the network is done due to the increase of computer
laboratory, the installation of network in the classroom, increasing the wifi point
open room.

The internet service for e-learning of the three high-performers has used a 1: 1
dedicated leaseline comparison where local Indonesian data access and
international data get a 1: 1 comparison. Implementation of e-learning is greatly
assisted by the cooperation between ISPs using the Open IXP model, using this
model of communication between ISPs is very fast and not paid because of the
ISP that is included in the IDC (Indonesia Data Center), so that e-learning access
speed can be increased.

the development of infrastructure done at the time of addition of data, the

amount of data is getting bigger, and the higher speed is done by adding device
or replacing with bigger capacity. Cloud technology offered by many ISPs is not
attractive because prices are still considered expensive, concern for data
security, ISP providers can do anything to the data without the owner’s intact.

Bandwidth management is done by dividing some parts of Server, Wifi, and cable
network. However, these three universities have different architectures that
divide each building and some divide bandwidth centrally. Wifi networks are
mostly used for student and guest services, while wired networks are used for
academic and teaching staff. The number of students accessing greatly affects
the speed of access to the server. The process of calculating bandwidth is as
follows:

BandWidth per student = (total bandwidth - Bandwidth for server-network cable)

/ number of students;

By comparing with the number of students then the need for internet access is
still less than 1Kbps / student. This data shows that if all students use e-learning
technology then that can be accessed is lecture material. The internet network
has not been able to access multimedia such as movies, video calls, video
conferencing. So that is done by doing a conference in class by scheduling.

Opensource technology is still the main choice, where the operating system and
learning management system (LMS). Selection of operating system based on
opensouce because it is considered safe, stable, easy to manage, update system
quickly. Linux operating system used one type with the aim of not difficulty in
transfer of knowledge to IT staff.

E-Learning 69
 Perguruan Jenis Jaringan
BW Server Cloud server Memory Hardisk internal Os LMS
Tinggi

X1 1.3 own server - Xeon 32 SaS FO backbone Linux Moodle

gbps rack

X2 1 gbps Colocation - Xeon 16 SaS FO backbone Linux Moodle

rack Cable

X3 850 own server - Xeon 16 SaS FO linux Moodle

Kbps rack Backbone

Conclusion
Universities that have accreditation A have all lead to the implementation of e-
learning though not fully concerned about Fully online elearning and still
implemented partially only some courses are still based on “Web-enhanced” or
learning enriched with internet access and Blended / hybrid e -learning.

Fully online elearning offered by the government is still constrained on

infrastructure whose development is implemented in stages due to high costs,
human resources in the field of IT and lecturers still have to train in the
utilization of e-learning is evident from the number of courses offered in e-
learning a bit.

Infrastructure development needs to be accelerated to anticipate the number of

participants and study programs using e-learning technology, in order to avoid
any disillusionment of participants in their use.

New technology-based infrastructure “cloud” has not been a solution in the

development of e-learning, because it is still considered high cost.

REFERENCES

[1] Cox MJ. K , “Formal to informal learning with IT: research challenges and
issues for e-learning “

[2] Jennifer C. R., Karen Swan. “Examining Social Presence In Online Courses
In
Relation To Students Perceived Learning And Satisfaction”

[3] Bela Markus “Thiinkiing aboutt e-Learrning”.

[4] UU no. 12/2012 “tentang pendidikan tinggi, pendidikan jarak jauh pasal 31”

70 E-Learning
[5] Permendikbud No. 109/2013

[6] Panduan Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh 2016

[7] Kebijakan Pendidikan Jarah Jauh dan e-learning di Indonesia

[8] kebijaksanaan Pendidikan Jarak Jauh dan E-learning di Indonesia

Kementrian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi 2016

[9] Yousef M. , Hamideh Z., “Mobile Learning for Education: Benefits and
Challenges”

[10] Shu-Sheng L., Hsiu-Mei H., Gwo-Dong C. “Surveying instructor and learner
attitudes toward e-learning”.

[11] Rozilah K., Musa A. A., Bala I. “Asessment Of Service User’s Experience On
The Facilities Provision At Uthm Students’ Residential Colleges”.

[12] Paul P., Felician A., Marius V., “Measuring the Efficiency of Cloud Computing
for E-learning Systems”

[13] Federico M., Maurizio S., Laura T., “The university as a venture capitalist?
Gap funding instruments for technology transfer”

[14] Abdul R. H, “Infrastructure Requirements for E-learning Implementation

and Delivery” http://blog.commlabindia.com/elearning-
design/infrastructurefor-elearning

Online Learners’ Motivation in Online Learning: The

Effect of Online - Participation, Social Presence, and
Collaboration
Andree E. Widjaja
Jengchung Victor Chen

ABSTRACT
Online learner’s motivation has been considered as one of the most
important factors that drives online learning. Drawing from the Self

E-Learning 71
 Determination Theory (SDT), this present study incorporated the
concept of Intrinsic motivation (Flow Theory) and Extrinsic
Motivation (Attention, Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction
Model, or popularly known as ARCS) to empirically investigate the
effect of online learner’s motivation towards online learning
effectiveness, measured by online learner’s grade and their
perceived skill development. Meanwhile, derived from the Social
Constructivists Theory, the factors such as online participation,
social presence, and collaboration were also considered as the
factors which could enhance online learners’ motivation. Seventy
five (75) International Management Business Administration (M.B.A.)
students who enrolled in several online learning courses were
participating in this study.

The findings of this study strongly indicated that higher online

learner’s Flow and ARCS could significantly increase online learner’s
perceived skill development, but not their grade. It was also found
that only online participation that could significantly enhance online
learners’ Flow. Other factors did not show the significant results.
Online learner’s extrinsic motivation did not show significant
increase in any factors. This study provides some valuable insights on
how to improve online learning course design which focuses on online
learner’s motivation, particularly by considering the factor of online
participation as the strongest factor that drives online learner’s
intrinsic motivation. The discussion and limitations of this study are
discussed.

Keywords: ARCS model, Collaboration, Flow theory, Intrinsic and

Extrinsic Motivation, Online Participation, Social Presence

INTRODUCTION
Unlike traditional face-to-face classroom, online learning is using Information
Communication Technology (ICT) as the only medium to deliver teaching
materials, interact, collaborate, and engage with other learners. The online
learning alters the face-to-face interaction, reduce social interaction, hence

72 E-Learning
causing the learners to feel isolated (Bolliger, Supnakorn, & Boggs, 2010; Shaw &
Polovina, 1999). Such condition would make the learning process more
challenging, especially concerning the loss of learners’ motivation (Bolliger et
al., 2010; Inoue, 2007).

Learners’ motivation ranges from intrinsic motivation in which learner is

motivated due to the challenges or the fun whenever they are doing the task, to
extrinsic motivation in which the learners take action due to external stimuli,
rewards, or avoiding pressure or punishment (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Xie & Ke, 2011).
In addition, the learners prefer more engaging learning environment which
learners and teachers would have direct interaction with other learners,
spontaneity, immediate feedback, and relationship (Clayton, Blumberg, & Auld,
2010). The online learning factors such as online participation, social presence,
and collaboration could imitate the traditional engaging learning environment to
some extent. Among the three aforementioned factors, online participation has
been argued as the strongest factor that contributes the most to learning
effectiveness in online environment (Hrastinski, 2009).

This study has objective to empirically investigate the learners’ motivation

towards online learning effectiveness, measured by grades and perceived skill
development (PSD). In addition, the effect of online participation, social
presence, and collaboration towards learners’ motivation were also included, as
to whether these factors could actually enhance learners’ motivation. Therefore,
the following research questions would be answered: 1). How learners’
motivation affects the learning effectiveness, measured by grades and perceived
skill development? 2). What are the effects of online participation, social
presence, and collaboration towards learners’ motivation, both extrinsically and
intrinsically?

This study contributes to the learners’ motivation theory, particularly in online

learning context. The higher the learners’ motivation is, the more effective
learning that the learners would have. This study empirically validates the
importance of learners’ motivation in online learning context. Besides, the study
contributes in proving the factors which is important to online learning such as
online participation, social presence, and collaboration. Few studies were found
to empirically validate the importance of these three factors, particularly the
role of online participation towards learners’ motivation. These factors are
crucial for designing proper instructional design that promotes learners’
motivation when they indulge in online learning environment.

E-Learning 73
REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT

Learners’ Motivation in Online Learning

Researchers emphasize the role of extrinsic motivation to explain user behavior.
However, Agarwal (2000) argued that intrinsic motivation also plays a very
important role. Motivation construct has been analyzed in multiple ways, mainly
the distinction is drawn between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation factors
(Gomez, Wu, & Passerini, 2010). The distinction between them is based on Self
Determination Theory (SDT) (Fagan, Neill, & Wooldridge, 2008).

Intrinsic Motivation – Flow Theory

Intrinsic motivation is a specific kind of motivation. When a learner is intrinsically
motivated, they engage in the tasks for the pleasure that come from that task
which may have an effect on their motivation (Song, 1998). Flow theory
framework can be used to measure the intrinsic motivation of online learners.
Csikszentmihalyi (1990) adopted this intrinsic motivation in a term which is
popularly called ‘Flow’. Flow theory suggests people are willing to perform
activities, not because by external rewards, but because of internal motivations
within themselves.

Extrinsic Motivation – ARCS

Keller (1988) argued the people will be motivated to undertake action if it gives
them personal satisfaction and if they have chance to be successful. Keller (1983)
believed that the motivation refers to the choices that people make as to what
experiences or goal they will approach or avoid, and the degree of effort they
will exert in that respect. Derived from the assumption that motivation is playing
greater role in the learning process, Keller proposed the ARCS model of
motivational design, consisting of four elements (Attention, Relevance,
Confidence, Satisfaction) for motivating learners (Keller, 1983; Keller & Suzuki,
1988).

Motivation and Learning Effectiveness

Motivation is a driving factor influencing performance (Sankaran & Bui, 2001) and
successful learning (Clayton et al., 2010). Many researchers agreed there is
positive correlation between motivation and the learning effectiveness. This

74 E-Learning
argument was strongly supported by Sach (2001) who supported that there is a
positive relationship between achievement motivation and learners’
performance. Several studies in motivation consistently suggested the higher the
motivation level, the better learners would perform in various instructional
settings (Sankaran & Bui, 2001).

Learners who have high motivation would show high grade performance (Sachs,
2001). Previous studies found motivational orientation of learners have
significant impact on their performance (Rau, Gao, & Wu, 2008). Meanwhile,
Gomez (2010) study showed the perceived motivation has significant relationship
with the learners’ perceived learning. Thus, when the learners’ motivation is
high, it would increase the learning effectiveness. Based on the aforementioned
arguments, the following hypotheses are proposed:

H1a: High intrinsic motivation increases students’ grade.

H1b: High intrinsic motivation increases students’ perceived skill development.
H2a: High extrinsic motivation increases students’ grade.
H2b: High extrinsic motivation increases students’ perceived skill development.

Online Participation and Motivation

Online participation as theory was initially proposed by Hrastinski (2009) in which
he argued that online participation underlies online learning as a the most
powerful variable than any other variables. Hrastinski (2009) articulated his
theory by arguing participation and learning is inseparable and jointly
constituting so that online participation would become the main key to drive
online learning. In this study, online participation is based on social constructivist
theory. By definition, “online participation is a process of learning by taking part
and maintaining relations with others. It is a complex process comprising doing,
communicating, thinking, feeling and belonging, which occurs both online and
offline” (Hrastinski, 2009).

Previous studies have shown that intrinsic motivation would significantly impact
learners’ participation rate in online discussion (Hew & Cheung, 2008; Xie & Ke,
2011). Therefore, it is also logical to reason that when the learners participate,
they tend to have higher motivation. On the contrary, lower learners’
participation tends to be caused by the lower level of motivation. The online
participation would promote the environment in which increasing learners’
motivation. The strong attributes existed in online participation as the strongest

E-Learning 75
learning variable is necessary to cultivate rich social learning experience. The
intense discussion, participation with abundant interactions among the learners,
the feeling, engaging experience, and belonging as well as more connected-
relationship as one community, all of them would have great effect in cultivating
learners’ motivation, both intrinsically and extrinsically. Thus, following
hypotheses are proposed:

H3a: Online participation increases learners’ intrinsic motivation

H3b: Online participation increases learners’ extrinsic motivation

Social Presence and Motivation

Short, Williams, and Christie (1976) were the first to introduce the concept of
social presence in the field of social psychology and communication. In their
study, they defined social presence as the “degree of salience” of the other
person in the interaction and the consequent salience of the interpersonal
relationship” (Short et al., 1976). Social presence in electronic and paper based
media is considered low, while face to face communications is high (Dennis,
Kinney, & Hung, 1999).

Social presence could affect learners’ motivation since it can enhance degree of
realness in the online environment. Recall that online learning as social process,
the existence of a real person virtually is very crucial, especially to trigger good
interaction and collaboration. The learners with high social presence would not
feel isolated and cold since they perceived as real by others in the online
environment (Rogers & Lea, 2005). In doing so, high social presence promotes
higher learners’ motivation to learn by providing the higher degree of realness
that supports their learning interaction and process, thus we expect that:

H4a: Social presence increases learners’ intrinsic motivation

H4b: Social presence increases learners’ extrinsic motivation

Collaboration and Motivation

By doing collaboration, learners can contribute to deeper learning, shared
understanding, critical thinking and long-term retention of the learned material
(Tsai, 2009). All of this would trigger the learners to have higher motivation to
learn. Research has shown collaborative learning could enhance learners’
motivation (Chou & Chen, 2008). Learners who perceived high levels of

76 E-Learning
collaborative learning tended to be more satisfied compared with those who
perceive low level (So & Brush, 2008). In high collaboration environment,
learners feel more engaged, intimate, and satisfied as they collaborate with each
other to produce shared artifacts, thereby increasing the learners’ motivation.
Thus, we expect that:

H5a: Collaboration increases learners’ intrinsic motivation.

H5b: Collaboration increases learners’ extrinsic motivation.

METHODS

Online Learning Experiment

The experiment was conducted in International Master of Business Administration
(IMBA) program in one Public University in southern Taiwan. Courses related with
ICT were chosen. The courses were Business Ethics and Information Security
(BEIS), Electronic-Commerce (E-Commerce), and Management Information
Systems (MIS). The online learning content was about studying Information
Ethics, Privacy and Trust.

The three classes were taught by the same professor acted as control in
delivering the materials. BEIS and E-Commerce were selected as experimental
classes, while MIS served as control class. Learners were not informed about their
involvement in this experiment. Each learner was asked to access online learning
management system, Moodle system provided by the University in which various
materials and assignments were delivered. In the beginning, learners in each
class were given brief training on how to access the Moodle system. Afterwards,
they were divided into team which consisted of two to three learners in each
team.

The learners were required to access materials and worked on four case study
assignments, each of which required to be finished in two weeks period. Learners
were required to submit the team papers at the end of assignment. The
experimental design followed 2X2X2 factorial design. In this study, treatment was
defined as operationalization of construct in terms of what functions or
instructional design provided in Moodle as well as activity and instruction given.
In experimental group each class was given treatment (high and low) to see

E-Learning 77
whether each treatment had any effect on the learners’ motivation. In addition,
social presence and collaboration treatment were designed for both
experimental groups, whereas the control group was not given any treatment.
The experimental groups consisted of 8 treatments where each group was
randomly assigned. A more detailed experimental design is shown in table 1 and
table 2.

Table 1. Experimental design table

Experimental Design

Social Presence

High Low
Online
Participation
Collaboration

Class High Low High Low

BEIS High A1 B1 C1 D1

E-Commerce Low A2 B2 C2 D2

MIS Control

Table 2. Experimental manipulation stimulus

Construct Stimulus Description

Social High • #Logins (required to sign in 2/week)

Presence • Full profile (info picture, description,
name)
• Introduction in Forum
• Chat room
• Group name (by themselves)

Low • Limited profile

• No Introduction
• No chat room

78 E-Learning
 Online High • SCORM embedded with animation,
participation music, video, graphic pictures, articles,
etc.
• Forum strictly graded for whole class
(content quality, how many posts/
replies)
• Must use Emotion Icon in forum
• Wiki IMBA update (whole class project) –
must contribute
• Chat function

Low • No SCORM
• Few video, link to external website
• Articles, link to external website
• Forum provided but optional
• No Wikipedia IMBA

High • Moodle Wiki (done online)

Collaboration
Low • No Wiki (email submit)

ARCS Design
To enhance online learning design as well as promote students’ external
motivation, the basic concept of ARCS instructional design was applied. Based on
the model, ARCS is the abbreviation of Attention, Relevance, Confident, and
Satisfaction. This concept was useful to make appropriate design for online
learning. The detail is as followed:

• Attention

Materials were based on the real world cases which were relatively interesting
and raised learners’ curiosities. Various materials were ranging from text,
graphics, and videos delivered over the Moodle. Other functions such as
discussion forums and wiki were used to retain learners’ attention.

• Relevance

Materials given were relevant to the course and meet the learners’ needs
for learning.

• Confidence

E-Learning 79
 Instruction as well as grading criteria was clearly defined before each
case. Both course materials and assignment were purposely design in
structured, clear, and to be easily understood so the learners’ confidence
could be enhanced.

• Satisfaction

The overall course design and materials equipped the learners to use new
way to learn through online learning. For example, various course
materials were given as well as intense discussion could provide
meaningful opportunities for learners to use their acquired knowledge or
skill. In addition, some function such as wiki was used. Thus, it was the
new experience for learners to be involved in such engaging online
activities.

Measurements
The assessment survey to measure intrinsic motivation was based on
virtualcourse flow measure (VFM) (Shin, 2006). The major constructs consisted
of: concentration (10 items), having a clear goal (1), skill (3), challenge (4), and
satisfaction (4). The survey used 7 point Likert-scale and were administered after
the online course had finished. Extrinsic motivation questionnaire was based on
Instructional Material Motivational Survey (IMMS) derived from Attention,
Relevance, Confidence, and Satisfaction motivational design model (Huang,
Diefes-Dux, & Imbrie, 2006). There were 20 item used which were claimed to be
statistically significant. In this study, the survey used 7 point Likert-scale and
were administered after online course had finished.

Grade was used as main prediction of learning effectiveness. The grade was
measured from the submitted papers. The grading criteria included: group
writing quality such as the correctness of the answers (40%); argumentations and
given solutions (40%); systematic writings as well as paper presentation (20%).
The grade was carefully graded by the instructors. The grade’s range was from 0
(lowest) – 100 (highest). The perceive learning was measured by Alavi (1994)
perceived skill development questionnaire which consisted of eight items.
Perceive learning is defined as changes in learner’s perceptions of skill and
knowledge levels before and after experience in learning. In this study, the
surveys used 7 point Likert-scale and were administered each time after the
learners’ finished the assignment.

80 E-Learning
RESULTS

Demographic
There were total of 75 learners in 3 classes, BEIS (27), E-Com (30), and MIS (18)
participated in this study. Table 3 shows the complete demographic data.

Table 3. Demographic data

Demographic N %

Male 28 37.3
Gender
Female 47 62.7

Nationality American 3 4.0

Bolivian 1 1.3

Canadian 2 2.7

Gambia 1 1.3

Hong Kong 1 1.3

Indonesia 1 1.3

Korea 1 1.3

Mongolia 6 8.0

Polish 2 2.7

Russia 1 1.3

Taiwan 46 61.3

Thailand 7 9.3

Vietnam 3 4.0

Demographic N %

E-Learning 81
 20-25 Years 19 25.3

26-30 Years 31 41.3

Age group 31-35 Years 21 28.0

36-40 Years 2 2.7

>40 Years 2 2.7

<1 hours 1 1.3

1 – 3 hours 13 17.3
Hours spend
computer 4 – 6 hours 26 34.7

>6 hours 35 46.7

<1 hours 4 5.3

1 – 3 hours 24 32.0
Hours spend
Internet 4 – 6 hours 27 36.0

>6 hours 20 26.7

Employed by Yes 16 21.3

IT company
before
No 59 78.7

Yes 18 24.0
Have IT
background No 57 76.0

Computer Poor 3 4.0

Skill
Mediocre 40 53.3

Good 20 26.7

Very Good 9 12.0

Excellent 3 4.0

Yes 8 10.7

82 E-Learning
 English is No 67 89.3
first language
Factor Analysis
We followed general factor analysis rule which is factor loading should be higher
than 0.7, while Cronbach’s alpha should be higher than 0.8. Table 4 shows the
factor analysis result.

Table 4. Factor analysis results

Factor Item Total Cronbach’s

Measurement Variables
Loading Correlation Alpha

ARCS Moodle 0.96

Attention
MA5
MA2 0.90
MA4 0.92 0.88
MA3 0.91 0.87
MA8 0.89 0.85
MA10 0.88 0.85
0.88 0.85
MA9 0.84
MA6 0.88
0.87 0.84
MA1 0.83
0.87
MA7 0.86 0.79
0.86
Moodle 0.82
Relevance
MR1 0.76
MR2 0.93 0.76
0.93
Moodle 0.93
Confidence 0.85
MC2 0.83
MC5 0.91
0.89 0.81
MC4 0.79
0.88
MC1 0.87 0.78
MC3 0.86
Moodle
Satisfaction DEL

E-Learning 83
 FLOW Enjoyment 0.95
E1
E3
E2 0.95 0.90 0.81
Telepresence 0.95 0.90
T2 0.95 0.89
T1 0.82
Focused 0.91 0.68
0.91 0.68
Attention
FA3
FA1
0.85 0.69
FA4 0.84 0.67 0.86
FA2 0.82 0.67
Engagement 0.69 0.51
EG2
EG4 0.88 0.77
EG3 0.87 0.75 0.85
EG1 0.85 0.71
Time Distortion 0.75 0.59
TD1 0.93 0.75
TD2 0.90
0.93 0.75
Challenge
C2 0.94 0.86
C1 0.93 0.84
C3 0.86 0.71
Perceived Skill P1 0.96
Development P2 0.92 0.89
(PSD) P3 0.92 0.89
P6 0.92 0.89
0.91 0.88
P4 0.91 0.88
P5 0.88 0.85
P7 0.80 0.75
P8 0.79 0.73
Flow and Grade
Table 5 compares the effect of intrinsic motivation (Flow) to learners’ grade.
Cluster analysis was performed to divide the learners’ Flow to two levels, Flow
low and Flow high. Afterwards, the Grade was clustered and compared based on
their Flow level. The result showed there was a slight increase in learners’ grade
between Flow low and Flow high. However, the increase was not significant due
to low ANOVAs result (F=0.88, P value = .35). As a consequence, hypothesis 1a is
not supported.

84 E-Learning
 Table 5. Flow and grade results
Grade in Flow Grade in
Class F Value Significant
Low Flow High

Mean 84.82 86.19

Total All
N 37 38 0.88 .35
Classes Stdev 6.12 6.47
* p < .05

Flow and PSD

Table 6 compares the effect of intrinsic motivation (Flow) to PSD. Cluster
analysis was performed to divide the learners’ Flow to two levels, Flow low and
Flow high. Afterwards, learners’ PSD were clustered and compared based on their
Flow level. The result showed there was a significant increase in PSD between
Flow low and Flow high. ANOVA result show significant number (F=10.74, P value
= .00). Hence, hypothesis 1b is supported.

Table 6. Flow and PSD results

PSD in PSD in
Class Flow Flow F Value Significant
Low High

Total All Mean 5.03 5.73 10.74* .00

Classes N 42 33
Stdev 0.90 0.94
* p < .05
ARCS and Grade
Table 7 compares the effect of external motivation (ARCS) with Grade. Cluster
analysis was performed to divide the learners’ ARCS level to two parts, ARCS low
and ARCS high. Afterwards, learners’ grades were clustered and compared based
on their ARCS level. The result showed there was no significant difference
between grades in ARCS low and ARCS high (F=0.24, P value=.62). Hence, we
reject hypothesis 2a.

E-Learning 85
 Table 7. RCS and grade results
Grade in ARCS Grade in
Class F Value Significant
Low ARCS High

Mean 85.93 85.19

Total All
N 33 42 0.24 .62
Classes Stdev 6.89 5.86
* p < .05

ARCS and PSD

Table 8 compares the effect of extrinsic motivation (ARCS) to PSD. Cluster
analysis was performed to divide the learners’ ARCS to two levels, ARCS low and
ARCS high. Afterwards, learners’ PSD were clustered and compared based on
their ARCS level. The result showed there was a significant increase in PSD
between ARCS low and ARCS high. ANOVA test showed significant result (F=7.78,
P value = .00). Based on this result, we strongly support hypothesis 2b.

Table 8. ARCS and PSD results

PSD in
PSD in ARCS
Class ARCS F Value Significant
High
Low

Total All Mean 5.08 5.69 7.78* .00

Classes N 43 32
Stdev 0.96 0.98
* p < .05

Online Participation and Learners’ Motivation

The online participation class showed relatively higher extrinsic and intrinsic
motivation than low and control class. ANOVA results confirmed there is
significant difference (F=7.57, P value = .00) for learners’ intrinsic motivation
between high and low online participation class. However, the extrinsic
motivation showed no significant difference (F=0.49, P value = .48). The result

86 E-Learning
suggests supporting hypothesis 3a and rejecting hypothesis 3b. Table 9 and table
10 show the results.

Table 9. Online participation and motivation descriptive results

Online ARCS Flow

Class
Participation

BEIS (High) Mean 4.93 5.45

N 27 27
Std Dev 1.12 0.84

E-Commerce Mean 4.73 4.84

(Low) N 30 30
Std Dev 1.04 0.83

MIS (Control) Mean 4.44 4.60

N 18 18
Std Dev 0.85 0.74
Table 10. Online participation and motivation ANOVA results

Online Participation Dependent F value Significance

ANOVA Comparison Variables

BEIS (High) ARCS 0.49 .48

Vs
E-Commerce (Low) Flow 7.57* .00
Social Presence and Learners’ Motivation
There was no significant difference in learners’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
between high and low social presence groups as it is shown by low ANOVA result.
Table 11 and 12 describes the descriptive and ANOVA comparison result. Hence,
we reject both hypothesis 4a and 4b.

Table 11. Social presence and motivation descriptive results

Class Social Presence ARCS Flow

E-Learning 87
 Mean 4.77 5.21
Total ( High) N 29 29
Std Dev 1.11 0.78

Mean 4.88 5.04

Total (Low) N 28 28
Std Dev 1.05 0.98

Mean 4.44 4.60

MIS (Control) N 18 18
Std Dev 0.85 0.74
Table 12. Social presence and motivation ANOVA results

Social Presence
Dependent Variables F value Significance
ANOVA Comparison

Total (High) Vs
ARCS 0.14 .70
Total (Low)

Flow 0.54 .46

Collaboration and Learners’ Motivation
There is no significant difference in learners’ extrinsic and intrinsic motivation
between high and low collaboration group as it is shown by low ANOVA result.
Table 13 and 14 showed the descriptive and ANOVA comparison result. Based on
this result, both hypothesis 5a and 5b are rejected.

Table 13. Collaboration and motivation descriptive results

Class Collaboration ARCS Flow

Total ( High) Mean 4.69 5.15

N 28 28
Std Dev 1.18 0.94

Total (Low) Mean 4.95 5.10

N 29 29
Std Dev 0.97 0.83

88 E-Learning
 MIS (Control) Mean 4.44 4.60
N 18 18
Std Dev 0.85 0.74
Table 14. Collaboration and motivation ANOVA results
Collaboration
Dependent
ANOVA F value Significance
Variables
Comparison

ARCS 0.81 .37

Total (High) Vs
Total (Low)
Flow 0.05 .81
DISCUSSIONS, CONCLUSION, AND SUGGESTIONS
This study empirically investigates the role of both learners’ extrinsic and
intrinsic motivation to the learning effectiveness, measured by the grades and
PSD. Our findings indicate high motivation did not significantly increase the
grade. However, higher motivation did significantly increase the learners’ PSD.
The similar results were also found for both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation.
This results would suggest that the higher the learners’ motivation, the higher
their PSD. This result can be explained by the subjective nature of motivation
and learners’ PSD. Meanwhile, grade is considered as objective in nature.

Learners with high motivation would mean that they had a spirit,
encouragement, and more efforts to learn more than the less motivated learners.
This motivation comes from subjective feeling of the learners, either extrinsic
or intrinsic. Consequently, when they feel that they learn something, they would
have better subjective reflection in their PSD. Learners who have high motivation
may report higher and more effective learning outcome in their PSD. Our result
is consistent with Gomez (Gomez et al., 2010) study, that there is a positive
relationship between learners’ perceived motivation to perceived learning.
However, our finding suggests that, it may not always consistent with their grade.
There were several studies argued the higher motivation should also increase
learners’ overall performance (Huang et al., 2006; Rau et al., 2008; Sachs, 2001).
Ideally, the higher motivation is supposedly, not only increasing their perceived
skill development, but also increasing their grade. However, such statement may
not always be true.

Rovai and Barnum (2003) argued that grade does not reflect the students’ pure
learning. In this study, there were at least three profound issues in using grade

E-Learning 89
as learning effectiveness measurement. These issues were, learners
heterogeneity, the grade was measured by the group work, and the possibility of
instructor biased while grading the assignments. Each learner might have diverse
experience of knowledge, abilities, talents, culture, and English abilities (the
online course was conducted using English), all of them could affect students’
motivation to learn as well as may determine their grade.

One important finding was related to intrinsic motivation (flow). High online
participation group experienced significantly higher flow than other groups.
However, high online participation did not significantly increase learners’
extrinsic motivation (ARCS). Flow as intrinsic motivation has several advantages
over extrinsic such as learners more likely to select challenging task, gain more
knowledge, promote greater creativity, better conceptual learning, and greater
pleasure as well as active involvement in activities (Cheng & Yeh, 2009; Stipek,
2002). Learners in high online participation group could make advantage of their
rich and engaging learning experience, thereby significantly increase their flow.
However, such significant increase in learners’ flow could not be found in social
presence and collaboration.

This study is not without limitation. The number of learners participate in this
experiment was considered too small and came from single University. Future
study should address this issue by increasing the number of learners, and if
possible to collaborate with different universities to generalize the results of this
finding. In this study, the grade was measured as a team work. However, we
measured individual motivation who works in the team in relation to their final
team grade. Future study should consider applying the motivation measures at
team level so that the team motivation can be more accurately related with the
team grade.

REFERENCE

Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive
absorbtion and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly,
24(4), 665-694.

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical

evaluation. MIS Quarterly, June, 159-174.

90 E-Learning
Bolliger, D. U., Supnakorn, S., & Boggs, C. (2010). Impact of podcasting on
student motivation in the online learning environment. Computers &
Education, 55, 714-722.

Cheng, Y. C., & Yeh, H.-T. (2009). From concepts of motivation to its application
in instructional design: Reconsidering motivation from an instructional
design perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 597-
605.

Chou, P. N., & Chen, H. H. (2008). Engagement in online collaborative learning:

a case study using a web 2.0 tool. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,
4(4), 574-582.

Clayton, K., Blumberg, F., & Auld, D. P. (2010). The relationship between
motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether
traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 41(3), 349-364.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New

York: Harper and Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in

human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.

Dennis, A. R., Kinney, S. T., & Hung, Y. T. C. (1999). Gender differences in the
effects of media richness. Small Group Research, 30(4), 405-437.

Fagan, M. H., Neill, S., & Wooldridge, B. R. (2008). Exploring the intention to use
computers: An empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation,
extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Computer
Information Systems, 4(3), 32-37.

Gomez, E. A., Wu, D., & Passerini, K. (2010). Computer-supported team-based

learning: The impact of motivation, enjoyment and team contributions on
learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 55, 378-390.

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2008). Attracting student participation in

asynchronous online discussion: a case study of peer faciliation Computers
& Education, 51(3), 1111-1124.

Hrastinski, S. (2009). A theory of online learning as online participation.

Computers & Education, 52, 78-82.

E-Learning 91
Huang, W., Diefes-Dux, H., & Imbrie, P. K. (2006). A preliminary validation of
attention, relevance, confidence, satisfaction model-based instructional
material motivational survey in a computer based tutorial setting. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 243-259.

Inoue, Y. (2007). Online education for lifelong learning: A silent revolution. In Y.

Inoue (Ed.), Online education for lifelong learning (pp. 1-28). Hershey, PA:
Information Science Publishing

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction, instructional design

theories and instruction: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.

Keller, J. M., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivation model in
courseware design, instructional design for microcomputer courseware.
Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q., & Wu, L.-M. (2008). Using mobile communication
technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning
performance.

Computers & Education, 50, 1-22.

Rogers, P., & Lea, M. (2005). Social presence in distributed group environments:
The role of social identity. Behavior & Information Technology, 24(2),
151158.

Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). Online course effectiveness: An analysis of

student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance
Education, 18(1), 57-73.

Sachs, J. (2001). A path model for adult learner feedback. Educational

Psychology, 21, 267-275.

Sankaran, S. R., & Bui, T. (2001). Impact of learning strategies and motivation on
performance a study in web-based instruction. Journal of Instructional
Psychology, 28, 191-198.

Shaw, S., & Polovina, S. (1999). Practical experiences of, and lesson learnt from,
internet technologies in higher education. Educational Technology &
Society, 2(3), 16-24.

92 E-Learning
Shin, N. (2006). Online learner’s flow’ experience: An empirical study. British
Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705-720.

Short, J., William, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of
telecommunications. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning,

social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment:
Relationship and critical factros. Computers & Education, 318-336.

Song, S. H. (1998). The effects of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted

instruction developed through the ARCS model. Florida State University.

Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th

ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Tsai, C.-W. (2009). Do students need teacher’s initiation in online collaborative

learning? Computers & Education, 54, 1137-1144.

Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peer-moderated
asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology,
42(6), 916-930.

DESIGN AND PROPOSAL OF INTERACTIVE DISTANCE

LEARNING MEDIA IN RURAL AREA
Eko Hadi Gunawan
Ridi Ferdiana
Sri Suning Kusumawardani

ABSTRACT
In Indonesia the condition of education in every region is still uneven.
One of the problems is the limited number of educators and
infrastructure that inadequate, especially in remote areas outside
Java, such as in the islands of Sumatra. Internet that unavailable to
reach the rural areas, inadequate a human resources and computer
resources become obstacles to perform of distance learning process.

E-Learning 93
 In this paper we explain how the distance learning process can be
done with the learning media that has low resources, can run without
depend on the internet and student are able to do what can be done
when they use distance learning actually such as accessing all the
materials, questions, write evaluation for teachers and get updates
both material and questions. Learning media system is divided into
two parts. Client used by students and server used by teacher. From
the server side, teachers can write materials and exams that will be
answered by students. In client side, students can bring learning
media and access all the subject matter and exams that have been
published by the teacher wherever they are. The results of the test
and evaluations from students and the updating of materials and
tasks that published by the teacher can be updated when the learning
media of students connect to the Internet and synchronize to the
server. The result of testing of this learning was consuming the
minimum resources and learning process is more interactive both in
terms of students and teachers.

Keywords: distance learning, rural area, learning media

INTRODUCTION
Education in Indonesia has many unresolved issues, one of them is the limited
access to the technology. The education in remote areas doesn’t have adequate
access to technology. Though education in Indonesia has a very important role
for development our country. The Human Development Index or IPM in Indonesia
has generally improved (BPS, 2006). But the highest and lowest IPM gap between
Jakarta and Papua increased from 2006 to 2007 from 13.2 to 13.6. This shows
that the growth of IPM gap between the regional was increased. One of the
indicators used in determining IPM is education. This means that inter-regional
education in Indonesia is still unevenly marked by an increase in the IPM gap.

The development of information technology shows the emergence of various

types of activities based on this technology, such as e-government, e-commerce,
e-education, e-medicine, e-laboratory, and others. All of them based on
information technology Wardiana(2002). According to Dedi (2007), in theory,
innovation in Information technology can be made according to user needs by

94 E-Learning
adopting information technology theories. This technology can be utilized to
solve the inequality of education in Indonesia, especially in rural areas. A solution
that can be used by governments to handle many students to have equal
education access is to use distance learning technology Keegan (2003).

The use of distance learning technologies is still very dependent on the

availability of internet networks that exist in the region. If there is no internet
available in that region, then the distance learning cannot be implemented. The
problem of internet availability actually can be overcome by using learning media
that can be accessed when available internet network or not available internet
without leaving the essential of distance learning. Therefore, we required a
learning media that can run without the availability of internet network, low
resources and easy to use by people in rural areas

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Rural area
According to the Directorate General of Rural Development, the rural areas have
two main characteristics: Comparison of people with large area is quite large.
The area in the countryside is still relatively large if we compared with the
number of people who occupy in that area. So the density and profession of
population is still low and based on the agriculture sector. The facilities,
communication and transportation are mostly very simple, such as stone roads,
simple asphalt roads, unpaved roads, and even paths. Transportation facilities
are commonly found among other rural transport, water transportation, such as
a simple boat or raft, even in some places there are still using the horse and cow.
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs in Rural Urban Local
Authority Classification or RUCLAD11 classifies that rural areas are areas with
populations under 10.000.

Distance Learning
Distance learning is a set of teaching methods which teaching activities are
carried out separately from learning activities. The separators of this activities
can be physical or non-physical distance. The example of distance learning is e-
Learning. Since the development of e-learning in 1999, the process of distance
learning began to be implemented in various world of education. Distance
learning is a breakthrough in education because the learning activities can be

E-Learning 95
performed by students and teacher which does not required to exist at the same
time and same place.

Several studies about distance learning media in rural areas were conducted by
Syed(2004) located in Bangladesh and Zhou housed in China. In 2002 Syed et al
conducted a survey that the technology used education at the time was still
based on the main media of paper. Syed et al then tried to apply distance learning
by using interactive teaching media that running over computer network. The
architecture of the network is using the client server system. The results indicate
that the distance learning process is highly dependent on the existing
infrastructure in the region. Zhu et al (2008) developed similar research in China
and used IPTV as an interactive learning media. From the two studies it can be
said that the implementation of distance learning can be established if the
distance learning technology is adequate such as using computer network or IPTV.

Z. Letray et al (2007) using distance learning media with a system called the
COEDU. The system runs using an internet network that can be accessed through
a web browser. And in 2016 Joshua et al (2016) conducted research on distance
learning in western Papua. They created a new device called Virtual Class Box
5.0 by using video conferencing as one way of doing distance learning in rural
area. From this point the teaching media of distance learning mostly using
internet technology as a media of communication between schools and between
users. The weakness of this technology for distance learning is availability of
internets. In Indonesia, the internet still encountered for schools that belong to
rural areas. When distance learning based on internets technology establish on
the rural area, the problem that rise is the teaching media can’t work properly
because internet was unavailable or low bandwidths.

A new breakthrough rise from Ijtihadie et al(2010). They create some quiz on e-
learning website that can run without using internet and able to synchronizing to
server when media connected to the internet. Implementation of this research
was the students open the page containing the quiz package over web browser
in apple smart mobile. Then download the package and run that’s package on
condition without internet network. After the student finishes the quiz according
that time scheduled by teacher, the website will store the data that has been
input by the students through the quiz. The data then synced to the server when
the phone is connected to the internet.

96 E-Learning
In this research, we tried to implement an interactive teaching media that can
synchronize and worked in rural areas that unavailability of internet network,
low computer specifications and easy to use by students.

METHODS
To know the obstacles that exist in the distance learning process in rural areas,
researchers conducted interviews to teachers who are in the region belonging to
the category of rural areas. From these interviews researchers get the main
obstacles in distance learning that is the availability of internet networks, low
computer resources and educator resources and students who are not familiar to
distance learning. From this obstacle we know that we need a learning media
that can work in rural areas that are unavailable of internet network, a low
computer resources and easy to use by students who are familiar or not familiar
with distance learning media.

System Specification
Smart Client Learning Material has a use-case diagram as shown in Figure 1. Smart
Client Learning Material or SCLM consists of two types: Smart Client Learning
Material for teachers and Smart Client Learning Material Desktop for students.
The SCLM for teachers are packaged as websites that can be accessed through
the internet network and SCLM for students are packaged as portable desktop
applications that can be accessed by students with portable storage media
without connecting to the Internet such as flash disk. Unavailability of internet
in rural areas can be overcome by using a synchronization system contained in
SCLM desktop applications. Desktop applications only require the Internet
network when students want to update material and questions that have been
published by teachers on the SCLM website.

E-Learning 97
 Figure 1. Interaction between Teachers, Students and Smart Client Learning Materials.

How SCLM applications work is a teacher who acts as author of writing material
and questions on the smartclient.site web page. Then SCLM Web will save the
material and questions into the database and publish it into json format. From
the student side, when SCLM Desktop is run for the first time, SCLM Desktop
requires synchronization to SCLM Website to sync material, questions and student
accounts then store them in the SCLM Desktop database. Once the application is
synchronized, students can read all material that has been published by the
teacher or work on the problem wherever he is without connecting to the
internet network. Synchronization process is only required when students have
done all the question and material updates that have been published by the
teacher.

Synchronization

The communication of Smart Client Learning Materials between teachers and

students is through synchronization system over the internet. The SCLM website
is created using php and MySQL programming and SCLM Destop system is created
using php and SQLite are packaged into a portable webserver called PHPDesktop
.. Communication between SCLM website and desktop was built using JSON. All
content that has been published by the teacher will be stored in the MySQL
database and published in JSON format. When the synchronization process on
progress, the data will be published by server in JSON format will be requested
and copy by SCLM Desktop then store into the SQLite database. In addition, SCLM

98 E-Learning
Desktop also sends student data to SCLM server such as score and track record of
student.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Learning media testing conducted in rural areas of Riau province with the
respondents of 7 students and teachers. Some tests are performed such as
synchronization testing, CPU resource testing and usability testing using System
Usability Scale. The scenarios used are teachers create student accounts and
write then publish materials and questions on the SCLM website. Before the SCLM
desktop application was released to students, SCLM Desktop are synchronized
with the SCLM website. Once the SCLM desktop app is synchronized, the teacher
delivers the app to students and one by one student attempts the app by utilizing
all the features that are in the SCLM desktop app. After students try the SCLM
Desktop application, students fill out a System Usability Scale questionnaire and
to find out how much CPU resources are used by SCLM Desktop, as long as desktop
SCLM applications run CPU resources are always monitored and recorded..

Synchronization testing
The benefit from SCLM System is the ability to run without any internet
connection. It can be worked because SCLM has a synchronization system that
can update the database between students and teachers when SCLM is connected
to the internet. When the synchronization process is done by SCLM Desktop, SCLM
Desktop will update its own databases containing user account, materials and
questions as shown in figure 2. Also sends a track record of student such as score
and evaluation into the SCLM Server database. From here the teacher outside
the classroom can monitor track records of students as shown in figure 3.

E-Learning 99
 Figure 2. Interface of material list on Smart Client Learning Material students after
synchronization.

Figure 3. Interface of track record Smart Client Learning Materials teachers after SCLM desktop
synchronize and sends the entire student track record to the SCLM web database.

100 E-Learning
CPU Test
For the evaluation of resources used by Smart Client Learning Material desktop,
SCLM desktop was monitoring in performance of core processor and RAM during
student running SCLM Desktop on a windows operating system. Several sample
are taken randomly to represent CPU resources used by Smart Client Learning
Materials. Data is shown in table 1
Table 1. CPU Resource Usage

Processor Processor
Sample SCLM 1 SCLM 2 RAM SCLM 1 RAM SCLM 2

1 9,4% 2,2% 27,6 MB 14,3 MB

2 10% 4,2% 25,6 MB 12.4 MB

3 7,1% 2,5% 13,2 MB 6,8 MB

4 8,5% 3,7% 16 MB 9,1 MB

5 11,8% 4,9% 29,4 MB 17,7 MB

6 10,1% 4,1% 26 MB 15,2 MB

7 9,3% 2,7% 28,3 MB 17,8 MB

Usability System
Interfaces and systems running on Smart Client Learning Materials are also tested
using System Usability Scale (SUS). Based on the results of the survey, the value
of SUS will be good if score above 68, and below the average if score under 68.
The results from Smart Client Learning Material usability testing gives score 71.
This means that usability of Smart Client Learning Materials has above average
performance or good.

From testing CPU resources, Smart Client Learning material has a good
performance for low computer resources. Usability testing of Smart Client
Learning Material also provides very satisfying results because it can easily be
used by ordinary students who live in the rural area. As a learning media, Smart
Client Learning Material can bridge the distance learning in rural areas that
unavailable of internet network. Smart Client Learning Materials require only
6.46% of the existing processor resources with an average consumption of 19 MB

E-Learning 101
of RAM. The quality of user interaction design of Smart Client Learning Materials
can be viewed from the high SUS score above average on usability test results.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Smart Client Learning materials can be a solution for distance learning especially
those that do not have internet network availability in their area. Consumption
of low computer resources and a simple interface can help the process of
distance learning without any constraints to computer resources, unavailability
of the Internet network and easy to use for people who live in rural area. With
the existence of Smart Client Learning Material, the use of remote technology
can now reach the countryside.

REFERENCE

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional

Pendidikan.
Yuniati, Neni, et al. (2011). Pembuatan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif Ilmu
Pengetahuan Alam Pada Sekolah Dasar Negeri Kroyo 1 Sragen. Jurnal Sentra
Penelitian Engineering dan Edukasi, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2011
Keegan, Desmond. (2003). Foundations of Distance Education: Third Edition.
Canada: Routledge
Wardiana, Wawan. (2002). Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi di Indonesia.
Seminar dan Pameran Teknologi Informasi.
Syed Mahbubu R . Rahman Hakikur. (2004).“Technologies and Issues in Distance
Education - Bangladesh Perspective,” IEEE.
Zhu Xiao Liang, Liu quan. (2008) “Education IPTV for E-learning in Rural Area,”
International Symposium on Information Science and Engieering.
Z. Letray – M, Kovacs – L. Nyeki. (2007). “E-Learning Based Distance Education At
Szechenyi Istvan University.” Innovations in E-learning, Instruction
Technology, Assessment, and Engineering Education.
Joshua Nainggolan, Garrysen Christian, Kevin Adari, Yoanes Bandung, Kusprasapta
Mutijarsa, Luki B. Subekti6. (2016).”Design and Implementation of Virtual
Class Box 5.0 for Distance Learning in Rural Areas,” ICITEE 8th.

102 E-Learning
Ijtihadie R.M, Chisaki Y, Usagawa T, Cahyo H.B, Affandi A,. (2010) “Offline web
application and quiz synchronization for e-learning activity for mobile
browser,” in TENCON 2010 - 2010 IEEE Region 10 Conference.
The Linux Information Project, (10 August 2017), “Client/Server Definition,”
available online at http://www.linfo.org/client_server.html
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, (10 August 2017), “Rural
Urban Classification,” available online at
https://www.gov.uk/government/ collections/rural-urban-classification.

Engaging Students in Open Distance Learning

Environments – A Personal Experience
Ku ‘Azam Tuan Lonik, PhD

ABSTRACT
The age of internet shaped not only the way teaching and learning is
conducted in conventional-traditional teaching and learning
environments but also helps in extending the reach of education to
a much wider audience. This is evidence in the form of an increase
in the number of open-distance-learning (ODL) programs offered to
the general publics. In general, the ODL institutions offering ODL
courses can be divided into two broad categories, that is, the
parttime course offerings as an off-shoot of the conventional higher
learning institutions or as an independent e-learning institution. In
either of this category, teaching and learning often take the form of
a blended learning approach. While there are doubts that the ODL
programs are comparable with the conventional learning, an
overwhelming number of studies have shown that when the course
materials and teaching methodology were held constant, there were
no significant differences (NSD) between student outcomes in a
distance delivery course as compared to a face to face course. Yet,
from the perspectives of a teacher, due to the limited face-toface
interactions with students, the main problem one face is the
challenge of engaging these ODL students. Success in engaging them
will help to reduce the attrition rate among the ODL students. In

E-Learning 103
 conventional teaching and learning environment, teachers are often
seen as knowledge disseminator, agent of change etc. Within this
paradigm, ‘good’ teachers are expected to guide students with what
they need to know. This, however, is difficult to achieve in the
opendistance-learning (ODL) environment whose learning space is
the virtual Learning Management System (LMS) and students-
teachers are separated with physical/geographical space. Real-time
face-to-face interactions and contact between students and teachers
are either non-existence or are very limited. This paper seeks to
explore, based on practical experiences of the author, ways and
means in engaging ODL students.

Keywords: open-distance-learning, student engagement, e-learning

INTRODUCTION
Open distance learning (ODL) offers students the flexibility and choice to decide
when, where and how they want to study. The Malaysian Qualifications Agency
(MQA) (2011), defines Open and Distance Learning (ODL) as “the provision of
flexible educational opportunities in terms of access and multiple modes of
knowledge acquisition”. Following Ahmad et al., (2013), it stated that, flexible
means the availability of choices for educational endeavours anywhere, anytime
and anyhow; access means opportunity made available to all, freeing them from
constraints of time and place; multiple modes mean the use of various delivery
systems and learning resources.

In ODL, learning is supposed to be an independent exercises. Students-learners

decides the pace in which they are comfortable in going through the course
materials and set their own study schedule. e-learning has since become the
backbone of ODL programs when integrated with the learning management
system (LMS). In the White Paper on Education Transformation, UNESCO
recognised the positive impact of e-learning on three aspects of learning namely
engagement, motivation and attendance (UNESCO, 2012). Other research has
also supported the findings that e-learning has a positive impact on education
(see for example, Olson, et al, 2011; Yazdi and Zandkarimi, 2013).

MOOC (mass open online course) not only extend the reach of education but
transformed also the ODL model. While ODL allows students flexibility in deciding
when, where and how they want to study, MOOC extend the fundamental thrust

104 E-Learning
of open learning to include and address the questions of what to study. With
MOOC, students can choose certain elements of the programs or certain
components of the course being offered. In hindsight, both ODL and MOOC
benefits from the advent of the internet and especially the e-learning. Ruiz et
al. (2006), defined e-learning as “web-based learning, online learning,
distributed learning, computer-assisted instruction, or Internet-based learning”.
Nonetheless, most studies on the benefit of e-learning are done on conventional
students whereby e-learning is an add-on component of an otherwise
conventional face-to-face learning environment. Within this environment,
students are subjected to traditional lectures and tutorials, and their progress is
within constant watch of the course tutors. This differs significantly with ODL
students whose contacts with course tutors and fellow students are very minimal.

This paper attempt to address the issue of motivating ODL students whose
contacts with course tutors and their fellow students are very minimal. Within
this environment, with the view that the students are separated physically and
spread over wide geographical areas, more often than not, these students can
feel isolated, discontent, loss and helpless. Hence the added role of the course
tutors within this environment is to mitigate these negative elements and to
engage the ODL students to realise their potentials.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Role of Teachers
Kanuka (2011) identified six roles of teachers. Those six roles are, (a) teacher
acts as a prominent disseminator of content and the student is a receptacle of
this information, (b) teacher organise curriculum around problems and situations
which relate to the experiences of the students, (c) teacher change the
behaviour of people (students) in such a way that they can work with each other
to design and build a society that minimizes suffering and maximizes the chances
of survival, (d) teacher support individual growth and self-actualization, (e)
teacher invoke changes in the political, economic, and social order in society via
the intersection of education and political action, and (f) teacher develop
rationality to bring about deepened awareness in meaningful touch with reality.
Undoubtedly, within the ODL environment, teachers cannot perform all of these
functions.

E-Learning 105
One major problem with ODL courses is the high attrition rates. Citing Carr,
(2000), Angelino, Williams, and Natvig, (2007), reported that the attrition rates
at the undergraduate classes taught through distance education are at the
average 10 – 20% higher than face-to-face. This is due mainly to the problems of
social isolations faced by the ODL students. According to Krajnc (1988) social
isolation can be measured by contacts with other students, contacts with
individual tutors, group consultations, attendance to short seminars and the
possibility to discuss personal learning problems with relatives and friends. Social
isolations when compounded with family, work and financial commitments that
they have to endure throughout their study – the three important challenges
faced by the ODL students – can impact on students’ participation, motivation
and achievements.

e-Learning
Finlayson et al., (2006) argued that e-learning is a different kind of learning
environment and learning experience for students which may directly affect
knowledge acquisition and skill. They argued that e-learning allows students to
easily interact with their teachers and with fellow students, thus allowing greater
collaboration despite the physical barriers that exist. The increased ICT
awareness and ICT literacy also helps reduce the technology-induced
generational gaps between students especially in ODL environments where the
age gaps between students tend to be huge and skewed towards the later age
groups. Finlayson et al. (2006) found out that e-learning make students more
receptive towards learning, especially by improving their attention,
concentration and remembering. In addition, Oye, et al. (2012) also found that
e-Learning has a significant effect on student’s academic performances.

In order to achieve this, course managers should be pro-active so as to engage

students for the sake of ensuring the success of not only the e-learning activities
but also the success of education in general. Junk, Deringer and Junk (2011)
outlined 11 key components that lead to success in the online learning
environment which are (1) engage the student, (2) invite the student to contact
the instructor when needing assistance, (3) provide online course materials that
are well organized and visually pleasing, (4) post the class schedule or timeline
containing clear due dates for assignments and discussion postings, (5) provide
clear learning outcomes or objectives, (6) create presentation slides and
activities that reinforce learning outcomes, (7) develop assignments that
reinforce learning outcomes requiring students use higher level thinking to

106 E-Learning
analyse and apply what they are learning, including requiring posting reactions
to others’ assignment postings, (8) interact with students in a conversational
narrative making reference to assigned learning materials, (9) choose graphics,
such as photos, video clips, or presentation slides that take a reasonable amount
of time to download, (10) include hyperlinks to websites students must access
and a brief description of site content, verifying that links are active prior to
student access, (11) provide frequent and descriptive feedback to students.

Singh, O’Donughue and Woron (2005) suggested that e-learning provides the
opportunity for teachers to test students of real-life business situations. This test
may not be limited to the business situations. Since students-learners are
matured working adults, it is most likely that they will embarks on ODL program
that can advance their career path and therefore will enrol in programs that befit
their job description. This allows the teachers to test students and assigned tasks
or assignments that suit their working experience thus enriching the knowledge
sharing among the learning community.

Using data gathered fom a case study involving 6 FE colleges, comprises 70 staffs
and 500 students and a survey of 508 tutors from 100 differenet FE colleges that
attended National Training Network training events, Finlayson, et al. (2006)
concluded that effective use of ILT (information and learning technology) has an
important impact on student’s immediate outcome in the area of knowledge and
skills acquisition and development of autonomous learners. According to them,
such positive impact depends very much on the effective use of ILT which include
availability of equipment, use of ILT based on sound pedagogy, tutors’ awareness
of the benefit of ILT to support learning and teaching and the time allocated by
tutors developing their ILT practices.

Students Engagement
Effective engagement requires course managers to understand that a) learning is
personal and idiosyncratic which requires course managers to view students as
individuals and they (the course managers) need to find out how students
individually make sense of any lesson or explanation; b) every student behavior
is a way to communicate something the student cannot express in any other way
or doesn’t consciously understand; and c) they (course managers) should never
assume, since too often they can be wrong because low grades on tests do not
necessarily mean that students haven’t studied, instead to realise that the

E-Learning 107
students may have been confused when the material was covered in class (Dodd,
1995).

School of Distance Education (SDE), Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Established in 1971, the SDE USM is the pioneer provider of higher education via
distance learning in Malaysia. Currently the school offered four degree programs,
namely Bachelor Degree in Arts (Geography, History, and Literature), Bachelor
Degree in Social Science (Anthropology and Sociology, Economics and Political
Science), Bachelor Degree in Science (Biology, Chemistry, Physics and
Mathematics) and Bachelor Degree in Management (Organisation, Finance and
Marketing). These programs are an exact replication of the traditional full time
programs offers by the various schools in USM.

The SDE adopts a blended learning approach in teaching and learning. Students
are provided with reading materials in the form of modules or books. This can
either be physical modules or books, or e-module or e-books. Tutorials are
conducted through videoconference as well as web-conference on a scheduled
basis. In addition, a three-week residential period is made compulsory each year.
Although the residential period was scheduled for three weeks, the time
allocated for each course for a face-to-face interaction with the course managers
are limited in view of the number of courses registered by students. The video
conference, web-conference and the residential period forms the face-to-face
elements of the teaching and learning activities. While the video conference and
web-conference are the electronic mediated interactions, the residential weeks
forms the actual or physical face-to-face interaction between students and
teachers and between their peers. In an earlier study, Ku Azam (2005) found that
students look forward to this residential period. One of the reason is that during
this three-week duration, students can fully concentrate on their study, free from
any kind study-work-family distractions.

With the development of ICT, e-learning was adopted and used extensively in
SDEUSM beginning 2005. This is integrated within the School’s Learning
Management System (LMS). Within this LMS, certain aspects of teaching and
learning activities are conducted. This includes e-assignment, quizzes, e-notes,
e-books, e-module, questions bank, the video lectures and forum. Traditionally,
the forum is the most active part. This somehow has been replaced by social
media platform especially the facebook. The use of ICT has also been extended
to the administrative functions of SDE which include students’ registration, e-

108 E-Learning
post, and ebrary. The University Science Malaysia library has a collection of over
120,000 E-Books accessible to our distance learning students.

Engaging Students in ODL environments – a Personal Experience

This section shall outline several approaches to be considered for adoption in
engaging students within the ODL environments.

Friendly and Attractive LMS environment

LMS should be friendly, attractive and above all comprehensive to attract
students’ attention. In the case of the SDE, we use Moodle as our LMS platform.
This can be accomplished by giving attentions to details. A comprehensive LMS
should provide a) an overview of the course (subject), b) the course learning
outcome, c) an overview of each of the lessons to be covered in the course, d)
the lessons’ learning outcome, and e) lesson plan (academic planner). Course
managers should be proactive to update materials and especially to guide
students along the way. It is advisable that these materials are made available
as time progress, or superficially as the lesson plan progress. Although the
materials might have been there from previous semester, but as in Moodle, this
can be turn-on and turn-off with the hide and show button.

A lesson plan would help students plan their study. This lesson plan can be
organised by either weeks or month, so that students knows whether they are
lagging behind or otherwise.

Organised lessons in sequence.

The lesson plan would require course managers to organise lesson in sequence.
Course managers/tutors should treat on-line lessons similar to face-to-face
lectures. In face-to-face environments, lectures are conducted sequentially.
Similar approach should be adopted in the ODL environments. The present author
find it beneficial to organise lessons sequentially according to topics. This is
helpful in facilitating discussion either in the form of forums or chats. Each topic
should have a synopsis to provide an overview of what to cover.

Organising the course through topics can be accomplished in Moodle by blocks.

Each block refers to different topic. In addition to its own synopsis and a learning
outcomes, each block can have its own activities which include additional

E-Learning 109
reading materials, quizzes, chats, video recordings, power points slides (subject
to preferences which can be uploaded in each of these blocks).

In SDE, tutorials are conducted via videoconference or web-conference. The

videoconference and web-conference are scheduled prior to the start of the
academic year. The recoding of these videoconference and web-conference
sessions are uploaded into the portal. Lessons can also be recorded by the course
manager. These recordings are made wither with dedicated software such as
Camtasia or are done in our in-house studio.

As with the lesson plan, students should be provided with a time table to guide
them when each of the lesson shall begin and when it will end. This will ensure
that students keep tract of their progress and prepare them for the lesson.

Since ODL students are mostly working adults with other work-family
commitments, a degree of flexibility should be given. Thus, forum can be opened
throughout the year and chats, which are normally constrained by time duration,
should be archived.

Group projects
Pratt (2015) suggested that ODL students must be made to feel that they are part
of a community, that is the learning community. Based on observations made
from previous studies, Pratt reported that “distance students who feel part of a
community of learners tend to be more satisfied and learn more effectively”
(p.20). Apart from reducing the problem of isolations, feeling part of learning
community will encourage the ODL students to compete, communicate and
collaborate with each other.

In overcoming the problem of isolation, group project should be encouraged.

Studies by Jacobs (2014) suggested that in implementing e-learning, students
should be encouraged to embark on group projects. Despite being separated by
geographical divide, group projects can be fulfilled with the help of the various
mode of communications available in this age of information super-highways.

Group projects has an advantage over individual projects whereby students are
forced to work together despite being separated by physical and geographical
locations. From our own experiences, this physical or geographical separations
does not hinder or discourage students from interacting between themselves.

110 E-Learning
The development of ICT and the wider coverage of ICT open up the
communications channels between students.

Course tutor can facilitate this communication by allowing the LMS to be used as
a platform for students to communicate among members of the groups by
creating groups within the course page. Apart from that, by allowing LMS to be
used as communication channel, course tutor has the opportunity to intervene
when necessary to guide students in the group projects.

1. Encourage Students to Think

Course tutors should encourage students to think. In LMS, such as Moodle,

this can be accomplished in two ways. First, thorough such features as
forum and chat. Second, through quizzes. This is more of a stick-andcarrot
approach. While the former is a mere encouragement, the later rewards
students by giving marks and can constitute a component of the
continuous assessments. Dodd (1995) argued that failure to participate in
forum or chats, or fails in test is a way students tried to convey a message
to the course tutor. By paying special attention to the participation in
forums and chats, and in answering quizzes, course tutor can take steps
to mitigate the situations thus preventing failures in the course.

2. Open up the Communication Channels

Course tutors should open up the communication channels between them

and the students. In ODL programs, majority of students are adult learners
with work and family commitments. These students when they were young
were most probably does not meet the qualifications to enrol in tertiary
educations. ODL programs provide them the opportunity to pursue a
tertiary education. It should not be a surprise if these students feel
inferior despite the age advantage and work experience they have.
Inferiority prevent them from opening up to the course tutors in public.
Instead, there would very much prefer a private channel of
communications. By opening up various communication channels, course
tutors can help these students to keep up with the demand of the course.
Communications should be a wide as possible, which may include emails,
Facebook, messages, WhatsApp, WeChat, tweeter etc., in addition to
conventional phone calls. As for the personal experience or rather
preference of the author, phone calls are least preferable for the reason

E-Learning 111
 that other means of communications mentioned above can be saved for
future references in cases of disputes or complains.

It is interesting to note that Petrovic et.al., (2013) discovered that while

students use Facebook to exchange information about the course among
themselves and that they find it to be more convenient, yet when
compared to Moodle, Facebook distract them from learning (average score
of 3.18 for Facebook and 1.28 for Moodle. This is understandable because
Facebook is a social media whose coverage are diverse and its main
purpose is not for education as compared to Moodle. Nonetheless, this
does not mean that this channel should not be pursued. The author has
experienced that by using Facebook, feedback or rather acknowledge from
students is spontaneous.

CONCLUSIONS
In most of ODL programs, the main study materials are the modules; a
wellstructured study materials produced specifically for the ODL students. A
wellstructured module, prepared with ODL students in mind, consists of an easily
understood materials accompanied with in-text exercises and the various
pitstops to allow pause, explain concepts, referenced to other sources such as
the internet, would allow students to digest the course contents.

The strategies discussed in this paper can act as compliments to this

wellstructured course modules.

REFERENCE

Ahmad Hj. Mohamad, John Arul Philips, Santhi Raghavan, Wahid Razzaly (2013),
Code of Practice for Open and Distance Learning - Kod Amalan
Pembelajaran Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh (dual-language). Malaysian
Qualifications Agency:
Petaling Jaya.

112 E-Learning
Angelino, L.M., Williams, F.K. and Natvig, D. (2007), Strategies to Engage Online
Students and Reduce Attrition Rates. The Journal of Educators Online,
Volume 4, No. 2.

Bergmann, J., and Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in
every class every day. Washington, DC: ISTE; and Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112060/chapters/Why-You-Should-
Flip-Your-Classroom.aspx

Bourlova, T. and Bullen, M. (2005). The Impact of E-Learning on the Use of

Campus Instructional Space in R.W.H. Lau et al. (Eds.): ICWL 2005, LNCS
3583, pp.
397 – 405. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Depth, D.K., Ng, A., Do, C. and Chen C. (2013). Retention and Intention in Massive
Open Online Courses.

http://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/6/retention-and-intention-in-
massiveopen-online-courses-in-depth

Dodd, A. W. (1995), Engaging Students: What I Learned Along the Way

Strengthening, Student Engagement, Vol. 53, No.1 (September), Pgs. 65-
67. Dood, M. (2015). Evidence for the Flipped Classroom in STEM. New York
PGCAP teaching course. Retrieved from

https://www-users.cs.york.ac.uk/~miked/publications/flipped_classroom.
dodds.pdf

Dron, J. and Anderson T. (2014). Teaching Crowds – Learning and Social Media.
Edmonton: AU Press.

Finlayson, H., Maxwell, B., Caillau, I. and Tomalin, J. (2006). e-learning in

Further Education: The Impact on Student Intermediate and End-point
Outcomes. Centre for Education Research, Department for Education and
Skills, Sheffield Hallam University School of Education.

Jacobs, P. (2014). Engaging students in online courses. Research in Higher

Education Journal Volume 26.

Junk, V, Deringer, N and Junk, W. (2011). Techniques to engage the online learner.
Research in Higher Education Journal, 101-115.

E-Learning 113
Kanuka, H. (2008), Understanding e-Learning Technologies-in-Practice through
Philosophies-in-Practice, in Anderson, T., The Theory and Practice of Online
Learning. Edmonton: AUPress.

Krajnc, A. (1988). Social Isolation and Learning Effectiveness in Distance

Education.
Ziff Papiere 71. Zentrales Inst. fur Fernstudienforschung Arbeitsbereich.
FernUniversitat, Hagen (West Germany). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/
ED301667.pdf

Ku Azam T.L (2005). Effectiveness of Videoconferencing, Intensive Course and e-

Portal in a Distance Learning Economics Programs. Malaysian Journal of
Educational Technology. 5(1).

McManus, D. (2001). The Two Paradigms of Education and the Peer Review of
Teaching. Journal of Geoscience Education. Vol. 49, No. 6: pp. 423-434.

Olson, J., Codde, J., deMaagd, K., Tarkelson, E., Sicnlair, J., Yook, S. and Egidio,
R. (2011). An Analysis of e-Learning Impacts & Best Practices in Developing
Countries with Reference to Secondary School Education in Tanzania. The
ICT4D Program Michigan State University. East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.

Oye, N.D., Lahad, A., Madar, M.J. and Ab.Rahim, N. (2012). The Impact Of E-
Learning On Students Performance In Tertiary Institutions. IRACST –
International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless Communications
(IJCNWC), ISSN: 2250-3501Vol.2, No.2, April 2012

Park, J. (2007). Factors related to learner dropout in online learning. In Nafukho,

F. M., Chermack, T. H., & Graham, C. M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2007
Academy of Human Resource Development Annual Conference (pp. 25-1–
25-8). Indianapolis.

Petrovic, N., Jeremic, V., Cirovic, M, Radojicic, Z. and Milenkovic, N. (2013).

Facebook vs. Moodle: What Do Students Really Think? ICICTE Proceedings.

Pratt, K. (2015). Supporting Distance Learners: Making Practice More Effective.

Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning. 19(1): 12-26.

Reich, J. (2014), MOOC Completion and Retention in the Context of Student

Intent. EduCause Review. http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/12/mooc-
completion-and-retention-inthe-context-of-student-intent

114 E-Learning
Ruiz, J.G., Mintzer, M.J. and Leipzig, M. (2006). The Impact of E-Learning in
Medical Education. Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 3.

Singh, G., O’Donoghue, J. and Worton, H. (2005). A Study Into The Effects Of e-
Learning On Higher Education. Journal of University Teaching and Learning
Practice.

http://jutlp.uow.edu.au/2005_v02_i01/pdf/odonoghue_003.pdf

Wagner R. (2011). Educational Technology: Social Media Tools for Teaching and
Learning. Atlantic Training Education Journal. Vol 6, No.1:51-52

Weimer, M. (2014), She Didn’t Teach. We Had to Learn it Ourselves. The Teaching
Professor Blog, Sept. 10th, 2014. http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/
teaching-professor-blog/didnt-teach-learn/

UNESCO (2012). The Positive Impact of e-Learning – 2012 Update. White Paper:
Education Transformation.

http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/ED/pdf/The%20Positive%20
Impact%20of%20eLearning%202012UPDATE_2%206%20121%20(2).pdf

Yazdi, S. M. and Zandkarimi, G. (2013). The Impact of E-Learning on some

Psychological Dimensions and Academic Achievement. International Journal
of Education and Learning. Vol.2, No.2: pp.49-56 (http://dx.doi.
org/10.14257/ijel.2013.2.2.05)

E-Learning 115
GAMIFICATION AND LEARNING
 Increasing Student Online Session Engagement
through Gamification
Roland Lorenzo M. Ruben

ABSTRACT
This paper focuses on the use of gamification in increasing the
students’ engagement in the online sessions of the class. The
researcher perceived significant changes in the students’ use of the
online sessions because of gamification. Gamification is a new
feature in the Schoolbook, the university’s learning management
system (LMS). The author adopted a flipped classroom model where
50% of the class sessions are done online. At the start of the class,
the students were told that the class is gamified. The game
mechanics were introduced and the use of points, badges and
leaderboards with the purpose of motivating students to focus also
on the online part of the instruction.

The study was conducted for one year covering the first and second
semester. During the first semester, gamification was used in a
French Language class and in a Basic Logic class in Philosophy during
the second semester.

The students answered an evaluation on the use of gamification at

the end of each semester. During the conduct of the gamified online
sessions, the performance of the students—in their online quizzes,
online submissions, discussion forums, and reading of the lesson
materials —had been very satisfactory. By and large, gamification has
increased students’ engagement in the online part of the flipped
classroom model. This has been clearly evident in the responses and
reactions of the students to the gamification of the online sessions.

Keywords: e-Learning, Blended mode of Learning, Flipped

classroom, Gamification, motivation

118 Gamification and Learning

INTRODUCTION
Student engagement is a very important factor in education. That is why teachers
try to find ways to engage their students in their classes because learning
becomes successful when students are engaged. Whitson said that Appelton
(1989) claimed that increases in student engagement are correlated to increases
in positive student learning outcomes such as higher GPA, higher attendance
rates and higher classroom participation (Whitson, 2009). In education, student
engagement refers to the degree of attention, curiosity, interest, optimism, and
passion that students show when they are learning or being taught, which
extends to the level of motivation they must learn and progress in education
(Abbot, 2014).

Nowadays with the advent of technology, the students are more distracted than
ever. Games has become mobile and it has captured the attention of the
students. It was already difficult to get their attention without the technology,
now it has become even more difficult with it. So, instead of telling the students
to get off the games, why not enter their world and gamify the classroom? This
way, we get their attention and harness their interest in gaming by diverting
their focus to the lessons which are gamified. As the cliché goes, if you can’t
beat them, join them.

E-learning came to the school a few years ago. It started with an in-house
learning management system developed by the school’s IT center. In 2014, De La
Salle University - Dasmariñas subscribed to NEO LMS as the school’s learning
management system. The virtual learning environment was named Schoolbook.
However, even though, it was an online environment, the kind where the youth
thrives, it was not smooth sailing, at first. Since it is new, online engagement is
difficult. Even if it means having readily available lessons materials, having at
least three attempts in online assessments and some days off from the classroom,
still, the students prefer the traditional style of instruction. They still prefer
faceto-face instruction and being spoon-fed with lectures. And when a teacher
uses online learning, students say that they are not teaching. They often forget
the online deadlines, ignore the uploaded materials and even forget their
passwords.

Student engagement is an essential part in learning, much more in e-learning.

Unlike in the classroom where somehow you can control the attention of the
students, in e-learning, we somehow lose that control because the students are
on their own. When they open the Schoolbook, they can also open other sites,

Gamification and Learning 119

like YouTube or Facebook that would distract their attention from the task at
hand. Since the conduct of the class is flipped, the students are expected to read
the lessons and complete assessments before coming to class. Oftentimes they
neglect this part and just come to class without having read the lesson materials.

This paper seeks to show that the use of gamification influences the students’
motivation and engagement. To find out if indeed this is so, the researcher seeks
the answers to the following questions: First, could the achievement system have
had any effect in their motivation and usage behavior? Second, could the factors
that made students motivated by gamification changed their outlook on the
online session?

While there is no magic pill or silver bullet, the researcher believes that
gamification will help engage students in their online classes. Looyestyn, et al
(2017) said that gamification is the recent trend that offers to increase
engagement through the inclusion of game-like features like points and badges,
in non-game contexts.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The study has used the Flow Theory in showing student engagement in gamified
online sessions. Whitson, states that Csikszentmihalyi (1990) said that it is a
theory of optimal experience based on the concept of flow – the state in which
people are so involved in an activity that nothing else seems to matter; the
experience itself is so enjoyable that people will do it even at great cost, for the
sheer sake of doing it (Whitson, 2009). To be in flow means the complete
immersion of a person within a task (Sailer, 2013). According to Whalen (1999),
the term flow refers to an optimal state of immersed concentration in which
attention is centered, distractions are minimized, and the subject enjoys an
autonomous interaction with the activity (Whitson, 2009).

Certain studies have shown the potential solution to student engagement in

gamification.

The application of game elements in a non-game environment is not exactly a

new idea by gamification designers or researchers. Similar approaches can be
observed in loyalty programs (Sailer, 2013). Roberts (2014) said that gaming is
also being utilized to engage employees and ultimately to change their behavior.
Cheong (2014) supports this idea by saying that one objective of gamifying
learning is to stimulate the same motivation and engagement that gamers have

120 Gamification and Learning

towards games in learners toward education. By increasing learner motivation
and engagement, it can be predicted that learning will improve.

Looyestyn (2017) concluded that gamification promises to increase engagement

with online programs. Barlow (2016) said that the introduction of games into the
classroom environment, with stars, levels, competition and goals, increased the
motivation of students to complete a greater quantity of schoolwork. They have
seen students more excited and more motivated to learn. Rewards, according to
Ryan (1996), refer to the gamification factors that satisfy learners’ shared need
and motivate them to engage in learning activities (Chang, 2016).

While game mechanics and game design are essential to gamification, the
researcher discovered that the kind of rewards that the students received while
performing their tasks is crucial in motivating them and getting them hooked in
their tasks.

METHODS
The research design is basically qualitative. The students answered an end of the
course survey at the end of the semester. The survey instrument has two sections:
the first one was about the demographic details while the second was about the
participants’ attitudes towards gamification and their opinion on how useful
particular game elements, such as rewards, could be in their class standings.
They were also asked what rewards they would like to add in the current set.

Materials
Twelve classes composed of college students answered the survey at the end of
each semester last school year 2016-17. In the first semester, students from
French language classes while in the second semester, students from Logic classes
were part of the study.

Subject and procedures

Two hundred sixty-seven students from different colleges and in different year
levels answered the survey out of 377 who are part of a blended class. They
answered anonymously 4 questions that deals with their experience in
gamification.

Gamification and Learning 121

 Characteristics
Gender Count %

Male 108 28.65%

Female 158 41.91%

Age

15-17 13 3.45%

18-20 224 59.42%

21-23 30 7.96%

24-26 0 0%

27-older 1 0.27%

Year Level

1st 3 0.8%

2nd 128 33.95%

3rd 100 26.53%

4th 33 8.75%

5th 2 0.53%

College

CTHM 105 27.85%

CEAT 58 15.38%

CLAC 53 14.06

CBAA 31 8.22%

CSCS 20 5.31
Table 1. Demographics of surveyed students

122 Gamification and Learning

During the first day of class, the students were oriented to the conduct of the
course. It was a blended class using the flipped classroom model. All course
materials, lesson content and assessments, were already uploaded in the
Schoolbook. All enrolled students were automatically included in the game.

Everyone started with no experience points (XP). They earned points when they
open the lesson materials and earn more when they pass the assessments. The
level points increased exponentially. They also earned bonus points when they
complete a lesson or module. The assessments had a gateway. During the prelim
period it’s 60%, 80% for the midterm period and 100% in the finals. The rule was
that if they don’t get past the gateway they will not receive the points. Unlimited
attempts were given to the students so they just kept on trying till they got past
the gateway or much better when they got a perfect score. Rewards and badges
were given when they reached certain levels. Not all levels had rewards. There
were also surprise rewards that were given in some assessments and
achievements. The different levels were given online game-like names. Level 1
is settler and they work their way up to Deity level. The eleventh level was the
highest level and the reward in this level is a final task exemption lottery ticket.
It means they will have a chance to be exempted from doing the final task.

The first level was very easy to achieve, and also the second and third level. As
they advanced easily they got hook in the game especially when they received
rewards along the way. The idea was to give rewards that would be beneficial to
them. Unlike other games, where players only received badges, in this game it
was created that rewards would help them earn more points and go up in the
levels. Rewards are in the form of Late Pass, Late Submission Pass, Assessment
Exemptions, Excused Absence rewards, One More Try, Final Task Exemptions
lottery tickets, etc. From this set of rewards, what is most beneficial for them is
the late submission pass reward as shown in fig. 2.

Gamification and Learning 123

 Figure 2. Rewards that are most beneficial

Figure 3. Additional rewards

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

1. How do you feel about the use of points and earning achievements
(badges, rewards) for different activities?

124 Gamification and Learning

The leaderboard in the Schoolbook only shows the top ten students. Most
students loved the idea of being on top of the leaderboard. One student said, “It
makes me strive harder than I would normally be because I kind of liked the idea
of being in the leaderboard.” Being in the leaderboard made them confident and
proud of their achievements.

Looyestyn (2017) stated that leaderboards may be a particularly useful form of

gamification to increase engagement. Sailer (2013) mentioned that from a trait
perspective general classes of motives and needs can evoke motivation. He said
that the use of the leaderboard showed two important motives: the achievement
motive and need for power. When a student has a strong achievement motive,
having a leaderboard that shows achievement, success and progress will
definitely motivate him to continue on. A student asserted, “It made me strive
harder because nothing beats the feeling of seeing your name on the
leaderboard.”

Some never had a chance to see their names in the Dean’s list or in the honor
roll, and seeing their names on the leaderboard gave them a sense of
achievement. This sense of pride pushes them to do more. One student said that
in the higher level, the points had become too high but it did not stop him from
doing more. Looyestyn (2017) said that leaderboards are more tangible and can
relate more to real life.

Barlow (2016) said that the introduction of games into the classroom
environment, with stars, levels, competition and goals, increased the motivation
of students to complete a greater quantity of schoolwork. They have seen
students more excited and more motivated to learn. One of the students in the
class, said that even though there are lots of assessments, it doesn’t really
matter, ‘go lang ng go!’ (just keep it going!). The gamified classroom had a
positive effect on the students, “because we were motivated to pass our
assessments and open the lessons.”

2. Did the achievement and reward system had any effect on your
motivation and usage behavior?

Students who were positive about competition commented favorably on many

items. They liked the ranking system. They enjoyed seeing themselves climbing
past “the competition” as the project progressed. As the ranking was visible to
all, there was an extrinsic competitive motivation, where achievement was

Gamification and Learning 125

experienced because of relative positioning. One student said, “I was monitoring
my position the whole way along and that’s what was motivating me.” “Yes, it
had. Because without it, maybe I won’t be able to do good in my assessment, it
won’t motivate me to do well and it would only bore me,” another remarked.

As a student is focused on the academic stuff, he becomes aware of that one task
and Whitson (2009) said that this student will not be easily distracted from that
task. The merging of action and awareness, and concentration on the task at
hand are characteristics of Flow. A student said that when a new question came
out, everyone was rushing to their phones and stuff and you were kind of
obsessed by it and you wanted to do really well. Another remarked, “it had a big
effect on myself because I usually don’t study due to work but the system taught
here made me really reach for my goals and made me study hard.” The students
spoke of having changed their study habits because of the success that they
experienced and the rewards they gained. One student quipped, “Yup, earning
points were kinda addicting!” It also helped that the goals were clear from the
start and feedback was immediate.

One of the clear motivating factors for those who enjoyed the project was its
novelty. For the students, it represented a welcome break from the traditional
learning activities, they encountered. One student mentioned that he was
amazed because this was the first time he encountered such learning experience.
He said that it was challenging and fun. Another expressed, “I think there was
more of a “want” to do it, as opposed to a “need” … There was definitely an
element of fun to it.”

3. What rewards do you see that is most beneficial for you?

Among the rewards that were won by the students, the Late Submission pass
reward was the most beneficial. Some students tend to procrastinate in
answering assessments or in submitting assignments. When they do, they usually
miss the deadline. With the late submission pass reward, they can answer or
submit missed assessments. One student said, “Yes, it is very helpful in following
up a missed assessment because as a dormer it is hard for me to do assessment
without a Wi-Fi, laptop and having a curfew. It helps us following up missed
assessment.”

The second most beneficial is the assessment exemption reward. This is a no

brainer. Who wouldn’t want to be exempted from a task? This reward is like a

126 Gamification and Learning

‘rest reward’ for them. After accomplishing some tasks, they get a respite from
incoming tasks, at least once.

The third most beneficial is Excused Absence reward. The school has an
attendance policy. The students are allowed only seven absences. If they incur
more than seven absences they are automatically dropped from the course and
received a failing grade. Having an excused absence reward will lessen those
number of absences and helps them stay on the course.

Many students were motivated by the rewards that proved beneficial. The notion
that rewards help them recover from missed assessments or from very low scores
that made them get good grades. It was both novel and motivating. One student
said that “the rewards were life-savers.” Another remarked, “I feel competitive
and eager to unlock badges and rewards and gain points as well as staying within
the top of the leaderboard.” One student said that, “Yes, achievement and
reward system effect my motivation in school. I feel like i deserve it. When you
really try hard on something, and you get a reward, it is an awesome feeling. It
is the energy that push me forward.”

4. What other rewards would you prefer after achieving levels?

When they were asked what additional rewards they would like, 36 out of 117
said that the rewards are enough. A student concluded, “I honestly can’t think
of any other rewards. The existing rewards are already very satisfying enough.”

There are also a good number that suggested more rewards. In figure 3, 28 out
117 (23.97%) respondents suggested rewards like, instant passing grade or an
immunity from discipline officers, etc. One said that an easy pass reward would
be great because it assures a passing grade. Another wanted a more practical
one, something that will be shared with the whole class, like some sweet treats.
An immunity reward would be great, declared one student. Something that would
excuse them from a minor/major violation.

This research has shown that the students did not mind the task at hand as long
as they get rewarded in the end.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Gamification is effective in increasing student online sessions engagement. The
students looked forward to the next lessons and assessments because they earn

Gamification and Learning 127

points when they do so. Earning points means being on the leaderboard and
earning rewards. This research has pointed out a practical contribution to
gamification. Leaderboards are good motivators but if a student finds
himself/herself in the bottom and feels that his/her classmates are way too
competitive for him/ her, that situation would demotivate the student. However,
rewards systems would counteract that demotivating factor. One student said,
“gaganahan talaga pag may reward” (it really motivated me to do more when
there are rewards). The reward system played a very important role in the
researcher’s gamified classroom. The students wanted the rewards because it
proved beneficial to them. The researcher had seen changes in his students’
attitude toward learning.

Here are some points that teachers must consider before gamifying their
classrooms. First, gamification needs a good game design. It is not enough if you
have the basic game mechanics, you should think how to use them accordingly.
Second, look for a framework or a theory that would support your game. A good
theory on game design is flow theory. More studies on the application of flow
theory on game designs is highly encouraged. Finally, develop a good reward
system.

Making a comparative study between blended classes who are gamified and
nongamified to see the difference of motivation and engagement must also be
done in the near future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researcher would like to thank the Center for Innovative Learning Programs
for their support and his colleagues, Mr. Loreto Camiloza and Mr. Edwin Lineses,
for sharing their expertise and precious time.

REFERENCES

Student Engagement in Online Learning: What Works and Why. (2014). ASHE
Higher Education Report. Vol 40 Issue 6, p1-14.

Barlow, T., Fleming, B. (2016). A science classroom that’s more than a game. The
Journal of Australian Science Teachers Association, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p31-37.

128 Gamification and Learning

Buckley, P., Doyle, E., Doyle, S. (2017). Game On! Students’ Perceptions of
Gamified Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Vol 20
Issue 3, p1-10.

Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in

Massive Online Open Courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19 (2),
177-203.

Cheong, C., Filippou, J., Cheong, F. (2014). Towards the gamification of Learning:
Investigating Student Perceptions of Game Elements. Journal of
Information Systems Education, Vol 25, Issue 3, p233-244.

Çeker, E., Özdamlı, F. (2017). What ‘Gamification” is and what it’s not. European
Journal of Contemporary Education, Vol. 6 Issue 2. P221-228.

Roberts, B. (2014). Gamification: Win, Lose or Draw. HR Magazine. Vol 59 Issue

5, p28-35.

Jen-Wei Chang: Hung-Yu. (2016). Exploring Engaging Gamification Mechanics in

Massive Online Open Courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,
Vol. 19 Issue 2, p177-203.

Looyestyn, J., Kernot, J., Boshoff, K., Ryan, J., Edney, S., Maher, C. (2017). Does
gamification increase engagement with online programs? A systematic
review. PLoS ONE, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p1-19.

Sailer, M., Hense, J., Mandl, H., Klevers, M. (2013). Psychological Perspectives
on Motivation through Gamification. Interaction Design and Architecture(s)
Journal.

Shearer, N. (2016). The Role of Behavioral Psychology in Gamification. American

Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings. P141-142.

Whitson, C., Consoli, J. (2009) Flow Theory and Student Engagement. Journal of
Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, Vol 2 No.1 p40-49.

Gamification and Learning 129

 EVALUATION OF ‘PRODIGY’, AN ONLINE
EDUCATIONAL GAME-BASED PLATFROM ON
MATHEMATICS
Joseph Ma. Steven S. Cabalo
Rolando G. Panopio

ABSTRACT
Students of the 21st century are students of the future. For students
to be engaged and motivated, the “intellectual barrier” between the
teacher and the student is removed, through a student-centered
approach. This can be further aided by the concept of gameducation,
or gamification of education alongside online communities. One of
the novel online educational game-based platforms is known as
Prodigy – a free accessible platform for both teachers and students
studying Grades 1 – 8 mathematics. With its two types of interface,
for the teacher and for the student, this study is limited to the
student interface only, and access to computers with internet
connectivity may be limited in certain areas of the country. An
evaluation of the platform was conducted by both the Grade 7
mathematics teacher of the University of the Philippines Rural High
School (UPRHS) and UPRHS students of Grade 7 Tindalo. Using a
forced-choice scale model (1 - Strongly Disagree; 2 - Disagree; 3 -
Agree; 4 - Strongly Agree) and open-ended questions, results yielded
a positive perception for the categories “Learning” (mode of 4),
“Ease of Use” (mode of 4), “Ability Levels” (mode of 3), and
“Technical Quality” (mode of 4). The teacher and most students
recommend the use of Prodigy in their mathematics classes as it aids
in student learning. Notable pitfalls of using the said platforms are
time constraints or management and the presence of built-in
calculators. Further studies are recommended in the field of
gameducation and online educational game-based platforms.

Keywords: evaluation, gameducation, high school, mathematics,

Prodigy

130 Gamification and Learning

INTRODUCTION
21st century students are students of the future. They are known to have
difficulties in maintaining focus, attention, and interest; those qualities are
needed to engage and motivate students. Thus, constructivism is one option.
McCray (2007) defined Constructivism, such that it “views learning as a process
in which the learner actively constructs or builds new ideas on concepts based
upon current and past knowledge.” McCray also added that the techniques
exhibited by Constructivism “may improve students’ academic performance and
achievement” where its aim is for the student to excel and attain academic
achievements.

Since students are engaged through the help of the instructor or teacher, the
“intellectual barrier” between the teacher and the student is removed, through
a student-centered approach. Courville (2011) noted that before the boom of
technology (internet, mobile devices) and its integration in education,
instructors and teachers need to be engaged face-to-face with the learning
community, such that it needs “physical proximity”. Courville added that through
the help of technology, the constructivist point of view can be applied, through
the context of “online learning communities” where students and teachers alike
can take part in socialization among them.

Notably, the concept of gameducation can be seen alongside online communities.

Gameducation is simply a combined term for gamification and education.
According to Jackson (n.d.), “gamification can be integrated effectively into
education to motivate students and enhance learning”. Gamification of
education can be integrated using digital or video games, such that Deterding et
al. (2011a) as cited by Jackson (n.d.) elaborated that the elements of video
games are important “to improve user experience and user engagement” which
can be applied in the context of students. Gamification of education is not simply
centered on playing games, but it also needs understanding about certain
concepts. Dickey (2005) as cited by Glover (2013), enumerated three (3) basic
components of a game: goal-focused activity (the winning component), reward
mechanisms (leaderboards, prizes, and achievements), and progress tracking.
Glover also pointed out that this concept of games is beneficial for student
engagement and motivation because the gamer’s efforts are cordially being
rewarded, thus being “fundamental in gamification.”

Prodigy is an online gameducation platform provided by SMARTeacher Inc. that

can be accessed at www.prodigygame.com. According to its website (“Prodigy”,

Gamification and Learning 131

2016), Prodigy is a free accessible platform for both teachers and students
studying Grade 1-8 mathematics, with an upgrade option (this option has a fee,
but upgrading simply unlocks extra content with “no impact on Prodigy’s
educational quality”). The game has various options for student assessment,
including formative, diagnostic, and summative assessments; such assessments
are built-in for students to think that the questions are part of the game. It is
inclined for both elementary and high school students, with its Pokémon-like
theme and graphics to have an appeal for students. In addition, the platform can
be played by the students at home on any internet-connected device, where the
students’ progress can be monitored by the teacher anytime.

The scope of this study is centered on playing Prodigy as an online educational

game-based supplementary material in Grade 7 education, examining and
exploring its qualities (content, usability, and technical) through teacher and
students’ participation. On the other hand, this study is limited to the game
component only; thus, an examination of the teacher component of the game is
not included (e.g. use of dashboard and planner), including functions such as the
“Assignment” and “Standardized Test”. Moreover, the school’s internet
connectivity was not available during the conduct of the study, thus the game
testing was conducted at the homes of the respondents.

The study was conducted during the second week to the fourth week of May 2017
at the University of the Philippines Rural High School (UPRHS), Bay, Laguna.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Gamification of Education
In relation to gamification of education, there are some studies involving its use.
According to Mubaslat (2012), the post-test results in the conducted study “show
that games have a good effect on improving the achievement for the primary
stage and to create an interactive environment.” Higgins, Katsipataki, & Xiao
(2012) also noted in their research that integrating technology, used as a
supplementary material in education is effective “rather than as a replacement
for it.” Moreover, the use of technology and gamification is best used during
“short but focused intervention” as stated by Bayraktar (2001) & Moran et al.
(2008) cited by Higgins et al. (2012). This brings light to the use of gameducation
platforms as supplementary materials in teaching, with lots of advantages in
education.

132 Gamification and Learning

Digital Game-Based Learning on Mathematics
Gamification of education can be applied in the digital interface (computers and
mobile devices). Active learning can be promoted through the use of computer
games, (Oblinger, 2004 as cited by Katmada et. al. 2014), yielding to more
interested students. Csikszentmihalyi (1990) as cited by Katmada et. al. (2014)
suggested that the use of such digital games “immerse[s]” players in a state of
‘flow’, such that students who use digital games truly enjoy playing it and have
a sense of involvement as they experience learning. ‘Flow’ as described by
Csikszentmihalyi is “the state in which people are so involved in an activity that
nothing else seems to matter.”

Alongside the state of ‘flow’ and increase in student engagement, digital game-
based activities promote a positive effect on student achievement and
performance. Katmada et. al. (2014) cited various works, including Pareto,
Arvemo, Dahl, Haake, & Gulz (2011) and Ke & Grabowski (2007) that reflect the
benefits of computer games in education. Pareto et al. (2011), in his novel work,
“created a teachable-agent arithmetic game that aims in training basic
arithmetics (sic.) skills.” With a sample size of 153 students (3rd and 5th grade),
the evaluation produced positive results, “that the game helped students
improve their math performance and self-efficacy beliefs.”

On the other hand, Ke & Grabowski (2007) were interested on the use of
adventure games. They studied the effects of such with a sample size of 125
participants (5th grade students), all of which were divided into groups of three:
(1) cooperative game playing group; (2) competitive game playing group; and (3)
no game playing group. These groups were examined given a duration of four (4)
weeks. Their findings showed that the “two game playing groups had better math
performance, while the cooperative game playing group had better attitude
towards the subject, compared to the other conditions.” Katmada et. al. (2014)
concluded that games “could actually be successfully incorporated and used by
educators as a supplementary tool for the teaching of formal curricular
material.”

METHODS

Research Design
This paper follows an exploratory research design, which aims to develop insights
and understanding on the use of Prodigy as an online supplementary material in
Grade 7 mathematics.

Gamification and Learning 133

Participants of the Study
Grade 7 high school students (A.Y. 2016-2017) studying at the University of the
Philippines Rural High School (UPRHS) were chosen as participants. There were 3
sections for Grade 7, namely Dao, Ipil, and Tindalo. Each class is composed of at
most 40 students. Through draw lots method, the chosen sample was Tindalo,
with a total of 38 students. Their current Grade 7 Math teacher was also a
participant in the study to have a teacher’s viewpoint on the program.

Data Gathering Instrument

An evaluation form, modified from the Grand Valley State University Software
Evaluation Form, was used for data gathering. It utilized a forced-choice scale
model, implying that the respondents have accessed and tried the online
educational platform, and thus avoiding any neutrality in the responses
(familiarity to the program is present). Moreover, the developed form eliminated
any ambiguous option, thus resulting to additional value for decisions on
respondents’ preferences. The form utilized the scale given below:

1 – respondent expresses a “Strongly Disagree” stand;

2 - respondent expresses a “Disagree” stand;3 - respondent
expresses an “Agree” stand; and
4 - respondent expresses a “Strongly Agree” stand.

The evaluation form was evaluated by two (2) UP NISMED (National Institute for
Science and Mathematics Education Development) personnel (Science Education
Specialist II and Audiovisual Group Chair, Ma. Lourdes Sales–Agad and Science
Education Specialist IV and Senior Lecturer II, Affiliate Faculty of Science Society
Program, College of Science, UP Diliman, Rodolfo S. Treyes, Ph.D.). An attention
check was added at the “Ability Levels” category to preserve data (“To preserve
your answers, please check “2”)

Data Analysis
The mode, frequency, and descriptive statistics were used to explain data. The
data from the forced-scale evaluation were summarized using the mode and
frequency, while the open-ended questions were analyzed using descriptive
statistics. These in turn provide an explanation on the perception and
effectiveness of Prodigy as a supplementary material on the chosen respondents.

134 Gamification and Learning

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Given that instructions were distributed to the respondents and that this study
was conducted at the expense of the students’ homes, Figure 1 shows that more
than half of the class size (55%) have registered and evaluated the game while
less than half (45%) of the students have not signed-up in the website. The
participating 55% of the sample size answered the evaluations forms and their
responses were tallied and analyzed based on the modes, frequencies and
descriptive statistics. The students’ responses were first analyzed, followed by
the teacher responses.

Figure 1. Percentage of student participation and non-participation

The frequency of the students’ responses for the evaluation categories

enumerated below are summarized Table 1.

In the “Learning” evaluation category, most respondents chose “Strongly Agree”.

Prodigy uses a variety of curricula in its game. In this study, the Common Core
State Standards (CCSS) curriculum acted as the study’s base curriculum since the
Philippine’s K-12 curriculum was not available in the choices. As the game was
used, Prodigy provided hints and correct answers for students who struggle or
obtained a wrong answer in a question for immediate feedback leading to a quick
explanation of a certain math concept. To organize student learning, the
“Planner” was used to organize specific topics and objectives for each session.
This aligned the game to this specific need the teacher wants his or her student
to develop, achieving the objectives by presenting the necessary questions for
student learning. Overall, the mode for this category is “4” (Strongly Agree),
implying a strong positive response in this evaluation category.

Most of the respondents “Strongly Agree” on all criteria for the “Ease of Use”
category. The game provided a series of dialogues that aid the user to identify

Gamification and Learning 135

what to do next. This design kept the user in track during the game that avoided
confusion regarding a current situation (e.g. in a monster battle). Like any other
web application, Prodigy can be closed anytime. Once the student disconnects
his or her device from the internet or logs-out his or her account, the game saves
the current achievement/s the student had. Moreover, the game provided a
variety of options to customize their characters to avoid racial bias; in-game chat
is strictly filtered to block abusive words (e.g. discrimination, hate speeches).
Overall, the mode for this category is “4” (Strongly Agree), implying a strong
positive response in this evaluation category.

In the” Ability Levels” category, most of the respondents “Agree” on all criteria.
The “teacher” chooses the grade level of his or her students and controls the
topic/s in Prodigy depending on his or her prerogative on topic planning.
However, once the plan has ended, the game will proceed to its diagnostic test
(free game) and will continue to identify students’ deficiencies and align its
questions to address such. Overall, the mode for this category is “3” (Agree),
implying a positive response in this evaluation category.

Table 1. Frequency of the students’ responses for the evaluation categories

“Learning” Category Criteria 1 2 3 4

1) The content is accurate. 0 1 9 11

2) The content demonstrates factual

knowledge. 0 1 7 13

3) The math concept is easily understood. 0 1 11 9

4) The content meets learning goals and

objectives. 0 0 9 12

SUBTOTAL 0 3 36 45

“Ease of Use” Category Criteria 1 2 3 4

1) Directions are clear. 0 1 4 15

2) Students can end the program at any 0 1 4 16

time.

136 Gamification and Learning

 3) Students can restart the program where 0 4 5 12
they stopped.

4) The game is easy to learn – user friendly. 0 0 7 13

5) The game is free of racial bias. 0 0 7 14

SUBTOTAL 0 6 27 70

“Ability Levels” Category Criteria 1 2 3 4

1) The user level can be set by the teacher. 1 1 13 6

2) The software covers a variety of skill levels. 0 1 12 8

SUBTOTAL
1 2 25 14

“Technical Quality” Category Criteria 1 2 3 4

1) Animation and graphics captures students’ 1 1 11 8

interest.

2) Audio is clear. 0 1 4 16

3) Feedback and prompts are appropriate to 0 2 6 13

the user.

4) Student interest is maintained. 0 3 11 7

SUBTOTAL 1 7 32 44
In the “Technical Quality” most of the respondents “Strongly Agree” to the
criteria. Aside from the in-game conversations and audio special effects during
game battles, Prodigy has provided the “Text-to-Speech” audio feature, such
that each question can be narrated to the student implying no bias for the various
reading levels of students. Aside from animation and graphics and audio, the
game contains nine (9) maps to explore, implying an adventure-type quest for
the students. This is designed to maintain students’ interest of exploring all the
nine (9) maps and to achieve the main goal – to finally reach the academy.
Overall, the mode for this category is “4” (Strongly Agree), implying a strong
positive response in this evaluation category.

Gamification and Learning 137

In relation to the students’ responses, this study also shows how a Grade 7
mathematics teacher views this educational online game-based platform as a
supplementary material in Grade 7 mathematics (Table 2). Looking at the
frequency of the teacher’s responses, most of her choices are “3” (Agree) and
“4” (Strongly Agree). Observing both data from the teacher and the students’
responses, both opinions are on
Table 2. Frequency of the teacher’s responses for all evaluation categories
Category Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 4 Question 5

Learning 3 3 4 3 n/a

Ease of Use 3 3 3 4 4

Ability Levels 4 ✓ 4 n/a n/a

Technical Quality 4 4 4 4 n/a

the same track regarding Prodigy as a supplementary material in improving
student learning.

Upon summarizing the tallies and modes, the student respondents have a positive
perception in general (Figure 2). This is in relation to the question regarding the
use of Prodigy for improving student learning as an open-ended question. Most
students cite the benefits of Prodigy’s good technical quality and its impact on
the students, such as the game is “more exciting and visual”, where there is the
inclusion of “fun activities” while answering the questions. Another said that this
lead to an increase in motivation for answering math problems. They show
inclined support for video games as it makes learning enjoyable, interesting,
appealing, and exciting (“doesn’t feel bored”).

Figure 2. Percentage of the overall perception of student respondents on Prodigy

138 Gamification and Learning

While the students agree on the benefits of Prodigy in student learning, their
views on its use as a supplementary material in mathematics vary, as shown in
Figure 3. Most students recommend the use of Prodigy in their math class with
the above reasons stated. While one (1) respondent expressed uncertainty, less
than a quarter of the student respondents do not want Prodigy to be used in their
classes as a supplementary material because “it takes a lot of time” while one
argued that the calculator function has been considerably used throughout and
“that would not result into learning.” Another comment from a respondent is the
availability of time in playing the game, such that given time constraints, “It is
better to study your books and notes than playing a game.”

Figure 3. Percentage of the student respondents’ choices on Prodigy as a supplementary material

in mathematics

Considering the teacher’s response to the open-ended questions, she supports

the use of Prodigy as a supplementary material in mathematics as the use of such
“would help the teachers in motivating the students to practice solving or
answering math problems.” Moreover, she believes that the platform is “fun and
interesting” to students, such that students will enjoy learning mathematics
through the help of the platform in terms of fun and interest.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Data from the evaluations yielded that the overall perceptions of the students
on “Learning” (mode of “4” – Strongly Agree), “Ease of Use” (mode of “4” –
Strongly Agree), “Ability Levels” (mode of “3” – Agree), and “Technical Quality”
(mode of “4” – Strongly Agree) inclined to be positive. In relation to the students’
responses, the teacher’s responses have most of her choices as “3” (Agree) and
“4” (Strongly Agree). Observing both data from the teacher and the students’

Gamification and Learning 139

responses, both opinions are on the same track regarding Prodigy as a
supplementary material in improving student learning; thus, there is a positive
perception towards the game. Overall, based on the teacher and students’
responses, Prodigy is recommended as a supplementary material in mathematics,
yet less than a quarter of the students do not due to time elements and the use
of the in-game digital calculator.

Given that the study was conducted at the students’ home, it is recommended
that the conduct of the study be made in the school premises, especially in the
computer laboratory where there is internet connectivity; this avoids
nonparticipation of students. Allotting multiple meetings may be applied in this
setup. Aside from this, other grade levels may be chosen as the sample size of
this study. Other online games related to mathematics may be studied using the
same type of questionnaire in this study.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author would like to acknowledge the UPRHS faculty and students,
specifically Grade 7 - Tindalo and their adviser for permitting the author to
conduct this study.

REFERENCE

Caponetto, I., Earp, J., & Ott, M. (2014). Gamification and education: A
literature review. In European Conference on Games Based Learning (Vol.
1, p. 50). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited,
London (Regno Unito). ISBN: 978-1-910309-55-1.

Chen, P. D., Gonyea, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Learning at a Distance: Engaged or
Not? Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(3).

Courville, K. (2011). Technology and its use in Education: Present Roles and
Future Prospects. Online Submission.

Glover, I. (2013). Play as You Learn: Gamification as a Technique for Motivating

Learners. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of
EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013
(pp. 1999-2008). Association for the Advancement of Computing in
Education (AACE).

140 Gamification and Learning

Higgins, S., Katsipataki, M., & Xiao, Z. (2012). The impact of digital technology
on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation. Durham,
UK: Education Endowment Foundation and Durham University.

Jackson, M. (n.d.). Gamification in Education: A Literature Review.

Katmada, A., Mavridis, A., & Tsiatsos, T. (2014). Implementing a game for
Supporting Learning in Mathematics.” The Electronic Journal of e-
Learning, 12(3).

Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and

empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research,
2009(141).

McCray, K. (2007). Constructivist Approach: Improving Social Studies Skills

Academic Achievement. Master’s Dissertation; Marygrove College.

Mubaslat, M. M. (2012). The Effect of Using Educational Games on the Students’

Achievement in English Language for the Primary Stage. Online Submission.

Newmann, F. M. (1991). Student engagement in academic work: Expanding the

perspective on secondary school effectiveness. In J. R. Bliss, W. A.
Firestone, & C. E. Richards (Eds.), Rethinking effective schools: Research
and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

“Prodigy.” (2016). Retrieved from: https://prodigygame.com

Group-based Game Making for Descriptive Writing

Andreas Setiawan

ABSTRACT
In this modern era, one of the most interesting inventions in the field
of entertainment is games. Not only could games relieve our stress
from daily routines, boredom, etc., but they could also be used as a
medium for learning. The purpose of this study is to discover the
Faculty of Language and Arts students’ perceptions on the
groupbased game making to learn descriptive writing and the
students’ perception of game-making benefits for learning

Gamification and Learning 141

 descriptive writing. The data were taken from 24 freshmen in batch
2016 of the Faculty of Language and Arts, Soegijapranata Catholic
University. For data collection, the writer used a close-ended, Likert
Scale questionnaire with four arranged options. The analysis method
used in this study is quantitative method which uses a simple
descriptive statistics analysis. The results of the study showed that
the students’ perceptions on the group-based game making to learn
descriptive writing and the students’ perception of game-making’s
benefit for learning descriptive writing is positive. Students found
that games were useful and helpful to be applied for descriptive
writing practice as it gave them various supportive multimedia aids
such as visual illustration, audio support, content editor, etc. and
group-based game making activity also enhances their
communication, peer solidarity, and language skills.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, technology has been making a major breakthrough in people’s

lives. It has been improving people’s lives by making things easier and advanced
in the fields of communication, information, transportation, healthcare, and also
entertainment. One of the most interesting breakthroughs in the entertainment
field is the invention of game. According to Salen & Zimmerman (2004), game is
“a system in which players engage in an artificial conflict, defined by rules, that
results in a quantifiable outcome” (p. 80).

The purposes of the invention of games are to give the users/players an

entertainment that they could actively engage in order to release the stress from
their routines or boredom, for leisure, and also for educational or learning
purpose.

One of the methods of using games for learning purpose is through the activity
of game making, especially in groups (working collaboratively). Group-based
game making (or collaborative game-making) provides a learning model where
students or learners can work together to create something meaningful for them,
which could also facilitate the development of a range of 21st Century Skills
(21CS) such as critical thinking, computer literacy, problem solving, etc.
(Bermingham, et al., 2013). Furthermore, designing and developing games could
address the needs that the learners require better than simply playing the
already-existed games (Brennan & Resnick, 2012; Robertson, 2012).

142 Gamification and Learning

Existing literature on the role of games used for learning has shown some
significant impacts for the learners. According to Dempsey et al. (1994), games
serve many functions such as tutoring, amusing, helping to explore new skills,
promoting self-esteem, practicing skills, or seeking to change attitudes. In
addition, simple types of games genre such as adventure, arcade, board,
simulations, puzzle and word games could be constructed to achieve specific
learning outcomes such as decision making and problem solving (Dempsey,
Lucassen, Haynes, & Casey, 1996), and help promote computer literacy skills
(Natale, 2002). Blake & Goodman (1999) have also found that using games as a
learning medium could motivate the students’ preparation for class and help
them become acquainted with their classmates that they have not worked with
before. Therefore, games could also be used to facilitate students to learn
collaboratively with their peers.

According to Lehtinen et al. (1999), collaborative or group learning refers to an

instructional method where students are encouraged to cooperate on learning
tasks. It means that the fulfillment of tasks and problem solving requires group
of learners’ mutual effort, involving communications and interactions between
them. Therefore, collaborative learning supports the idea that learning is a social
activity in which knowledge-seeking inquiry is fulfilled through combined efforts
of the inquirers.

The reason why the writer conducted this research on group-based game making
to learn descriptive writing is due to the fact that the writer wanted to find out
the potential of the use of game to enhance the learning process and skill such
as descriptive writing skill. The writer would also like to know if games could be
designed and used for learning purpose to achieve a specific learning outcome.
Even though there is some research on the utilization of game for learning in
other countries, such literature is still lacking in Indonesia, and that is why the
writer decided to contribute one to it. In this research, the writer formulated a
problem related to the students in the Faculty of Language and Arts: What are
students’ perceptions on group-based game making to learn descriptive writing?

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

GAME
Before we discuss any further, it is important to know what a game is actually for
the purpose of this review. Dempsey et al. (1996) defined game as:

Gamification and Learning 143

 A set of activities involving one or more players. It has goals, constraints,
payoffs, and consequences. A game is rule-guided and artificial in some
respects. Finally, a game involves some aspect of competition, even if that
competition is with oneself. (p. 3)

It might be best if we treat game like our parts of the body, each of which has
different designs, purposes, gameplays—competitive, cooperative, or
individualistic (The British Educational Communications and Technology Agency
[BECTA], 2001, p. 1) and target audiences, giving a broad range of options for
players to experience and enjoy. To put it simple, game has many varieties of
categories. According to Herz (1997), there are some major game categories, as
follows:

1. Action games – a type of games where players’ reaction plays a major role
in completing the games such as shooting games, platform games (where
the players need to move their character from one platform to another in
the game in order to survive, for example), and other reaction-based
games.

2. Adventure games – a game where players need to fulfill some tasks or

quests in a virtual, in-game world in order to proceed to the final stage/
finish the game. Examples of them are Assassin’s Creed, God of War, etc.

3. Fighting games – a kind of game where players fight (mostly using martial
arts) computer-controlled enemies or player-controlled ones. The
objective of this game category is to defeat your opponent and become
the winner, just like in a real fighting competition. Examples of this type
are Tekken series, Mortal Kombat series, Ultimate Fighting Championship
(UFC), and other fighting-based ones.

4. Puzzle games – a kind of game where player(s) complete certain types of

puzzle. Some examples of this type of game are Tetris and Candy Crush
Saga

5. Role-playing games – in this game, players assume a role of a character,

mostly in fantasy or science fiction settings and able to interact within it.
The Elder Scrolls series, Final Fantasy series, Borderlands series are some
of the popular examples.

144 Gamification and Learning

 6. Simulations – a category where players play simulated, (mostly) real-life
activities in order to succeed. Some of the examples are The Sims, Theme
Hospital, and Euro Truck Simulator series.

7. Sports games – a type of game where players play a simulated sport

activities. Some game titles that belong to this category are NBA, Pro
Evolution Soccer, and Madden NFL.

8. Strategy games – a game type where players have to do strategical

gameplay such as commanding a group of heroes or armies in a fight and
managing in-game resources. Age of Empires, Civilization, and Kessen
series are good examples.

Like Herz (1997), Griffiths (1997, 1999) also divided games into more or less
similar categories, but he mentioned that only two categories from the list,
which are puzzlers (puzzle) and weird games (games that do not fit another
categories), contain educational capabilities. He also suggested that the
aforementioned categories could be implemented in schools so that it might
“foster learning and overcome some of the negative stereotypes that many
people have about computer games.”

In their research findings, Blake & Goodman (1999) found that using simple
types of games such as Wheel of Fortune and Tic-tac-toe for nursing school
students improves their motivation for class, social life (have a chance to
know their non-familiar peers), and scores greatly. The positive results are
also related to the students themselves. Wheel of Fortune and Tic-tac-toe
were chosen because the majority of the students are familiar with both types
of games, as it is also popular. Also, Blake & Goodman (1999) did a very good
job in utilizing the games for learning. They shaped both kinds of games in a
way that the learning content could be optimized and delivered smoothly to
the students to achieve the desired learning outcome (Dempsey, Lucassen,
Haynes, & Casey, 1996). The students’ increased preparation for class has also
improved the teaching process. Teachers are able to cover more contents and
use less time to deliver the materials; thus making the subject delivery more
efficient.

THE USE OF GAMES FOR LANGUAGE LEARNING

Although it may seem to be contradictory in a sense, games could also be used
to foster language learning. According to Gee (2003), in this digital and modern

Gamification and Learning 145

era, language itself is and has always been a mixture of sound, words, images
created in the mind, and gestures used in contexts full of objects, sounds,
actions, and interactions. Game is not only about playing and enjoyment, but
there is more to it. Games also have objectives and story contents inside them
which are mostly represented in texts. The difference is, however, the game
developers offer a more creative approach in delivering them than a
book/writing does. The approach always situates (“shows”) the meanings of the
words and demonstrate how they vary across different actions, images and
dialogues. They do not offer just words for words (“definitions”) like a dictionary
does. Game almost always gives verbal information in the right time—when
players need and can use it—or when the players request it. Game has its own
unique ‘language’ for the players. It is presented by a mixture of texts and
modern audiovisual technologies, resulting in a good description.

Gee (2003) stated that a well-designed game can leverage deeper and deeper
learning, and in this context is language learning. Ang & Zaphiris (2006) also
stated that the contexts that games and simulations provide offer (the player)
great opportunities to use (learn) the target language.

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING
According to Dillenbourg (1999), collaborative learning is “a situation in which
two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together” (p. 1).
Collaborative learning is a learning method that emphasizes social interactions
among the members of the group to gain or learn knowledge through mutual
sharing from their different thinking perspectives. There are several benefits of
collaborative learning. It helps promote students’ critical thinking skills, engages
students to involve actively in the learning process, improves students’ classroom
performance and results, and also fosters their problem solving techniques
(Roberts, 2005). In collaborative learning, the participants or group members are
more or less on the same level (of knowledge), but there are no individuals in
this world that possess the same knowledge from one to another (Dillenbourg,
1999). Therefore, the best way to utilize collaborative learning is to learn new
things that we haven’t known before through the group’s interaction so that one
may learn from each other’s knowledge and expertise (Gokhale, 1995).

146 Gamification and Learning

COLLABORATIVE GAME-MAKING
According to Bermingham et al. (2013), collaborative game-making provides a
model in which learners can work together to create something meaningful for
them, facilitating the development of a range of 21st Century Skills (21CS) such
as critical thinking, computer literacy, problem solving, etc. Kafai (2006) also
elaborated that the pedagogic idea of learning by making games could be
presumed that the construction of games provides learners to reformulate their
subject understandings and helps to express their personal ideas and feelings
about the games’ subject and the games constructed, both respectively.
Designing games enhances students’ sense of classroom community, which
motivates them to ask questions and provide their help for others (Baytak &
Land, 2010) as well as sharing their thoughts such as tips and alternative methods
of problem solving in the game-making environment (Robertson & Nicholson,
2007). In addition, the needs of the learners could better be addressed by
designing and developing games than simply playing the games which have
already existed (Brennan & Resnick, 2012; Robertson, 2012). Cheng (2009) has
also proven that learning motivation, problem solving ability, and creativity in an
interactive multimedia course of the students could be facilitated by his Game
Making Pedagogy (GMP) model. the research findings also indicate that students
were satisfied with making their own games due to the strong sense of ownership
and benefited from inter-group and intra-group interactions. Furthermore, in his
research, Earp (2015) stated that game-making occupies the position in between
game-based and technologyenhanced learning, and focuses more on active,
learner-driven methods in education. In his research findings, game-making by
the learners also fosters their digital technology familiarity and confidence in
the classroom. The activity also encompasses several important skills like
collaboration, creativity, and thinking skills. Sanjaya, Murniati, & Blair (2016) has
also shown the usefulness of gamemaking activity to learn collaboratively in their
research. Thus, collaborative game-making activities provide students
meaningful opportunities to become better communicators, problem-solvers,
and support the development of various skills such as reading, writing, speaking.
It also encourages them to use and familiarize themselves with digital & visual
communication aids.

DESCRIPTIVE WRITING
Hollingsworth (1988) defined descriptive writing as “...giving dimensions, colors,
surroundings, origins, placement, and other information to help readers get a

Gamification and Learning 147

mental picture of an object, person, or idea, and how it operates.” In general,
descriptive writing provides illustrations of several subjects such as people,
places, events, situations, thoughts, and feelings. It also presents sensory
information which makes the writing more vivid. Also, descriptive writing could
express an experience that readers can actively participate in by using
imagination. Details in descriptive writing (or descriptive details) greatly support
the development of the overall dominant impression. The dominant impression
is an idea or theme which the writer wants to express from the complexity of
the story’s construction. An activity, snowboarding for example, can be described
as exciting or scary depending on words which are carefully chosen, or from a
subtly crafted mood. Mostly, a thesaurus offers a great help to achieve this. It
has lists of variety of words with similar meanings or connotations. Descriptive
details enable readers to visualize several elements contained in the story. Vivid
adjectives and active verbs will significantly boost the writer’s ability to develop
specific descriptions of the aforementioned sensors.

Descriptive writing provides literary texture to a story. Texture is more into

‘showing’ rather than ‘telling’. The writer shows the reader through different
kind of senses such as sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, as well as through
emotional feelings. Below here are the examples of a sentence which tells and a
sentence which shows:

• The woman on the beach watched the sun set over the ocean. (tells)

• The liquid began to evaporate slowly due to its exposure to the heat (tells)

• The old, Victorian-style painting of a seasoned war veteran which rests in

the main hall of the building threw me an eerie, intense stare as I slowly
tiptoed my way through the blood-stained mahogany door. (shows)

• Shades of neon illuminated the edges of clouds, backlit by the sizzling sun
that slipped beneath a cerulean sea. (shows)

From the examples above, sentences that tell tend to be direct because they are
objective. Sentences that tell record verifiable facts as a scientist or journalist
might. On the other hand, sentences that show are subjective; they may be
influenced by the writer’s personal experiences. Sentences that show create
mental images and elicit emotional response for the readers.

In conclusion, descriptive writing enables students to write better and teach

several benefits such as: 1) organizing their thinking or idea, 2) searching for and

148 Gamification and Learning

communicating details, 3) defining people, places and things, and 4) writing with
clarity and purpose. (Schacter)

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION

Participants
The participants of this research were the freshman of the Faculty of Language
and Arts. The population of the participants is 65 students. The writer recruited
all of them to the workshop but there were only 24 students who were voluntarily
willing to come. The reason why the writer chose the participants was because
the students just started to learn and practice descriptive writing in English
writing class.

Instrument
In collecting the data needed for the research, the writer used instrument to
achieve the research’s goals. The instrument to collect the data in this study are
questionnaire. Questionnaire is a series of questions which are utilized to collect
data or information needed from the respondents involved (Creswell, 2009). The
writer used the questionnaire from Murniati & Sanjaya’s study (2015) that was
modified slightly in order to match it with the purpose of this research and a
game-creator software called RPG Maker MV.

The questionnaire was about the students’ perceptions on group-based game

making to learn descriptive writing. According to Cohen, Manion & Morrison
(2007), there are two kinds of questionnaire:

1. Close-ended questionnaire: prescribe the range of responses from which

the respondent/participants may select.

2. Open-ended questionnaire: could be used if there is an excessive amount

of possible categories which a close-ended questionnaire would contain
an extremely long list of response options.

Gamification and Learning 149

 The questionnaire that the writer used for this research was close-ended
questionnaire and it consisted of seven background questions and 18
statements. Four response options are provided in the questionnaire, ranging
from:
• 4 (Strongly Agree)
• 3 (Agree)
• 2 (Disagree), and
• 1 (Strongly Disagree)

The questionnaire used was already in English because the participants of this
research were the students of the Faculty of Language and Arts so the writer saw
it unnecessary to transcribe it.

The game-creator software, RPG Maker, is a program that enables its users to
create their own RPG (role-playing video games). Most of it has a tile set based
map editor, a simple scripting language for scripting events/dialogue, and a
battle editor included. All RPG Maker releases have initial premade tilesets,
characters, and events that can be utilized in creating new games. Also, for the
PC version, users could add new tilesets and characters, including new graphics,
should they want to. RPG Maker MV is the latest series of RPG Maker programs.
It has been greatly improved from the earlier releases, and it has multi-OS
support, side-view battles and high resolution support. RPG Maker MV is the first
engine in the series to use Javascript with plugin additions. Also, completely
created games can be played on a mobile device.

Research Procedure

In this section, the writer would like to elaborate the procedure of this research.

1. Firstly, the writer modified the questionnaires from Murniati & Sanjaya’s
study (2015), entitled The Integration of Games for Collaborative
Learning. The writer edited and deleted some parts of the question in
order to meet the writer’s need for this research’s results. For example,
the writer changed the addition of ‘descriptive writing subject’ emphasis
in some of the questions. One example of it is the question ‘Do you agree
that a game meets your needs for learning a subject?’ is edited into ‘Do
you agree that a game meets your needs for learning descriptive writing
skill?’

150 Gamification and Learning

 2. Secondly, the writer did a pilot study to check the validity of the
questionnaire. The pilot study was done by six students who are not from
2016 batch. Based on the six participants’ responses, the statements of
the questionnaire were clear enough and no confusing statements were
found. Therefore, it can be concluded that all statements of the
questionnaire are valid.
3. Third, the writer asked for permission from the lecturer(s) of the Faculty
of Language and Arts for conducting the workshop.
4. The writer met and informed the students a day prior to the workshop and
explained briefly what this research and workshop were about, also the
preparations needed for the workshop (laptop/ computers).
5. Next, on the workshop day, the writer divided the students into a group
of three and gave the students an hour to brainstorm their story ideas.
After that, the writer guided them in creating and editing the game step-
bystep until they were finished with their work.
6. Then, the writer distributed the questionnaires to the students who had
finished their work. The writer also assisted them in filling the
questionnaires to make sure that there would be no misunderstanding in
filling it.
7. Next, the writer analyzed the data from the questionnaires to find out
about the results. The writer analyzed the data quantitatively by using
SPSS to calculate the data.
8. Lastly, the writer interpreted the questionnaire results to acquire the
final, conclusive data.

METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS

The questionnaires were given to the students in class after the workshop was
done. The workshop for this research was conducted at Henricus Constant (HC)
B.1.3 classroom of the Faculty of Language and Arts. The participants of this
research were 65 students of 2016 batch of the Faculty of Language and Arts but
only 24 students were present for the workshop. For the workshop, the writer
informed the students to bring laptops before the workshop day for installing
RPG Maker MV, which was the game used for this research. During the workshop,
the writer first explained the students what descriptive writing is about. Then,
he asked the students to brainstorm their question ideas for their game for one
hour. Next, the writer guided the students during the game installation process,

Gamification and Learning 151

followed by content editing, what should be added, how much questions, what
topic and so on. Last was the finalization of the game. The writer asked the
students to entitle and test their created game and also their peers’, followed
by questionnaire filling.

After the students finished filling in the questionnaires, the writer analyzed their
answers based on Likert scale for the statements quantitatively by using SPSS.
According to Babbie (2007, p. 171), Likert scale is a type of composite measure
developed by Rensis Likert in an attempt to improve the levels of measurement
in social research through the use of standardized response categories in survey
questionnaire. There are four response options provided, ranging from 4
(Strongly Agree), 3 (Agree), 2 (Disagree) and 1 (Strongly Disagree) where 4
(Strongly Agree) is the most favorable answer and 1 (Strongly Disagree) is the
least favorable answer.

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

In this chapter, the writer would like to discuss the findings and interpretation of
the data related to the students’ perceptions on group-based game-making to
learn descriptive writing. The writer analyzed the data based on the related
theories and previous researches that have been done. The writer also obtained
the data from the freshman. The students had taken paragraph and expository
writing class, had knowledge about descriptive writing in general. The students
who participated in the workshop were only 24 out of 65 of the total population,
with the total gender combination of 4 male students and 20 female students. In
this chapter, the writer described the findings in two sections; the first half
consisted of each of the background questions, and the second half is the 18
statements that were found in the related questionnaire. They are as the
following:

BACKGROUND QUESTIONS

Table 1. Gender
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Female 20 83.3 83.3 83.3

152 Gamification and Learning

 Male 4 16.7 16.7 100.0

Total 24 100.0 100.0

As the writer have stated above, a total of 24 students were the participants of
the workshop/research conducted. The participating male students were four
persons only, where the female students were the majority of the participants,
taking as much as 83.3% of the total amount (20 students).

Table 2. Playing frequency

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Very Often 4 16.7 16.7 16.7
Often 7 29.2 29.2 45.8
Sometimes 7 29.2 29.2 75.0
Seldom 6 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 24 100.0 100.0

The second item of the background question was the frequency of the students’
playtime. Four of the students said they played games very often. Seven of them
played games often too, but not as frequently as the first four students. The rest
were casual gamers as there were 29.2% (seven) students that played games
sometimes, and the last six students, which took 25% of the total, rarely or
seldom played games. The result indicates that the gaming frequency of the
students vary from one another depending on their preference of using their
leisure time.

Table 3. Platform used for gaming

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

On my laptop 8 33.3 33.3 33.3

On my smartphone 15 62.5 62.5 95.8

On my console 1 4.2 4.2 100.0

Gamification and Learning 153

 Total 24 100.0 100.0

The next item was about the gaming platform that the students tended to use.
The majority of the population (62.5%) played their game on their smartphone,
while the rest of the students played it on their laptops and gaming consoles,
summing as much as 33.3% (eight persons) for the former and 4.2% (one person)
for the latter. Rather than the usual gaming platforms such as computers/laptops
and consoles (PlayStation, Xbox, etc.), this result shows that most students
preferred a platform that is compact, easy to carry, and able to access at any
time, which is smartphone.

Table 4. Gaming skill

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Very Good 2 8.3 8.3 8.3
Good 19 79.2 79.2 87.5
Fair 2 8.3 8.3 95.8
Poor 1 4.2 4.2 100.0
Total 24 100.0 100.0
The fourth background question asked about the students’ confidence in rating
their game-playing ability. 19 students were confident that their game-playing
ability was good, whereas two students proudly stated that they had a very good
game-playing ability than the rest. 8.3% of them felt that their game-playing
ability was fair. Interestingly, one student, or 4.2% of the total population,
acknowledged that his/her game-playing ability was poor. Based on the result,
the majority of the student felt that they had a good skill in gaming which could
be indicated that the students were familiar enough with the games that they
played.
Table 5. Game type
No Game Type Total
1 Real-time strategy 8
2 Simulation 12
3 Role-playing game 8
4 Puzzle 8

154 Gamification and Learning

 5 Massive multiplayer online 2

The fifth from the background questions was about some type of games that
students liked to play. The writer provided some options and the students were
free to choose for more than one option, should they want to. From the table
above, the most favorable game type that the students liked the most was
simulation games whereas the second most popular ones belonged to real-time
strategy, role-playing game (RPG), and puzzle, favored by eight students each.
The least favored type was massive multiplayer online (MMO) which was chosen
by two students only.

Table 6. Numbers of players

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent
Percent Percent
Multiplayer 6 25.0 25.0 25.0
Single player 18 75.0 75.0 100.0
Total 24 100.0 100.0

Background question number six was about the students’ preference of players
in playing games. From 24 students, 25% (six) of them liked to play the game
with their friends/family members/colleagues (multi-player) whereas the
majority 75% (18) for this category preferred to play it individually (single-
player). The result of this question shows that students liked to play their games
by themselves due to accessibility and availability. Playing a single player game
is quicker rather than multi player because students did not have to wait or even
need another players.

Table 7. Creating game

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Percent
Yes 3 12.5 12.5 12.5
No 21 87.5 87.5 100.0

Gamification and Learning 155

 Total 24 100.0 100.0

The last background question was about the students’ experience in creating a
game. In this simple question, students were asked whether or not they have
created a game before. Three of them answered with ‘yes’ whereas the
remaining 21 answered with ‘no’. While students’ inexperience in creating a
game are high, this is understandable because the students are from the Faculty
of Language and Arts whose focus is studying English instead of game making.

STATEMENTS
From the table (see table 8 on appendix A and table 9 on appendix B), we can
see that the overall mean score of the students’ perceptions on group-based
game making to learn descriptive writing could be concluded as favorable. Also,
there are two statements that have the highest mean scores of all (3.42),
respectively Statement 4 (This game is helpful for me to practice descriptive
writing) and Statement 14 (Games should be included as a learning medium in
schools/ colleges). The mean for Statement 4 indicates that the usage of the
game helps the students describe their writing practice. The writer also observed
during the workshop that each character and setting could be developed
differently into a various form of descriptive details/questions from one group
to another in a short time. The majority of the students felt this game, or the
usage of this particular game during the workshop, are more helpful than the
standard writing activity (without any multimedia aids). The other one of the
highest-scored statements, which is Statement 14 (Games should be included as
a learning medium in schools/colleges), shows that the inclusion of a modern
learning medium, which in this case, game, is very preferred by the students in
a school/college setting.

The second high-scored statement (3.38) goes to Statement 13 (It is possible to

use the game to practice other English skills and contents [e.g. reading,
sociolinguistics, culture]). Based on the favorable response, the students felt
that the game holds many possibilities to be applied in other English skill courses
and contents. Meaning, the game’s academic application is not limited to writing
practice purposes only, but also to other English-related courses such as
structure, reading, and literature if it is programmed in such way.

156 Gamification and Learning

The statements that highlight the relevance of group-based game making for this
study are Statement 8 (I am interested in creating group-based games to practice
my descriptive writing skill), Statement 11 (I feel that group-based games are
more appealing if they can be played on various gadgets), Statement 15 (We
distribute the writing tasks equally), and Statement 16 (The team members
shared their ideas in creating the writing activities). The aforementioned
statement each have the following means of 3.00, 3.25, 3.08, and 3.29, resulting
to an average mean of 3.155. This data show that the students have perceived
a good attitude towards group-based game-making activity. Students feel that it
is a good activity for they could enhance their writing skill (in this case,
descriptive), and contribute something to the group such as ideas which are very
relevant to what Robertson & Nicholson (2007) had stated (sharing ideas & tips).
They also take turns in writing the descriptive questions/statements so that
everyone is involved in the process. The students also thought that the group-
based games that they created would be more interesting if it could be executed
on various gadgets/platforms so that everyone could enjoy it without any
technological hindrance or limitations.

The next list of statements highlights the students’ thought of the game’s usage
for practicing descriptive writing. Statement 4 (This game is helpful for me to
practice descriptive writing), 6 (Creating a game to practice descriptive writing
is exciting), and 7 (I feel this game meets my needs to learn descriptive writing
skill) are covering this section. The average mean of the aforementioned
statements for this section is 3.333. The average mean scores for this category
has proven that game’s usage plays a quite major part in boosting the students’
descriptive writing practice through the game aids as it is deemed helpful,
exciting, and fulfilling by the students. As for the game application for another
writing genre stated by Statement 5 (I am interested in creating a game for
different writing genres), the students also showed a positive attitude towards
the activity.

The statements that show the students’ personal thought of the game-making
activity and the game itself are Statement 1 (I feel satisfied with the game I
created), 3 (The template is helpful for me to create the activities), 9 (I am
interested in sharing the game I created), 10 (The game I created is useful for
other learners who want to practice their English skills), 12 (I feel that the game
I created is interesting), and 18 (It is better to create this kind of game on my
own). Favorable responses are given from the students to Statement 1 (3.13), 3
(3.29), 9 (3.00), 10 (3.21), 12 (3.17). We can see that after the activity was done,

Gamification and Learning 157

the students were satisfied with their created game. They also felt that the game
was helpful for them in creating the activities, meaning that the game has
provided a smooth support for the students. Interesting aspects that we could
deduct from their answers are their opinions on the game. They believe that it
is interesting and helpful for other learners to improve their English skills, and
they don’t even mind sharing it with others also, should they need one. As for
Statement 18 (It is better to create this kind of game on my own), the students
felt that the provided game template will be easier to manage individually. This
could be caused by the availability of the laptops per group, which is only one.
Although they took part and took turns in sharing their ideas (Statement 16) and
typing the contents (Statement 15), the wait between turns could cause a
boredom, which is believed why they would like to do it fully on their own.

The remaining statements, Statement 2 (Creating the game is easy for me) and
Statement 17 (Creating the writing activities is more difficult than creating the
game itself), received mean scores of 2.42 and 2.92 respectively. The students
found that making the game is not easy as they thought it would be as there are
many things that should be managed and programmed. The writer also found it
a bit overwhelming at first, but with a bit of practice and familiarity with the
game itself, everything will be easier and fun after a while. The writer believed
that the cause was from the students’ unfamiliarity for they tended to ask the
writer for a help in optimizing their game’s content. As for Statement 17,
students found it quite challenging in making the descriptive writing activity.
Before the workshop began, students were asked by the writer whether they had
reached descriptive writing in their writing class or not, and the students
answered that they had just started on the particular topic but had not practiced
much. From their answers, the writer believed that the cause was the students’
unfamiliarity with the descriptive writing itself.

In general, the findings of this study related to the students’ perceptions on

group-based game making to learn descriptive writing could be indicated as
favorable. The students felt that the game and the game-making activity are
both interesting and helpful. The idea of working in groups received a positive
response as well. Students were able to contribute to and share something with
the group to maximize their work. The game is also perceived to be helpful for
learning descriptive writing as well, as it contains many interesting functions and
features inside to support the learning process despite having some drawbacks,
such as the students’ familiarity with the game and their knowledge about
descriptive writing.

158 Gamification and Learning

CONCLUSION & SUGGESTION

Based on the analysis on the previous chapter, the writer found out that in
general, the students’ perception on group-based game making to learn
descriptive writing have received a favorable response. Group-based game
making has been considered as a fun activity by the students as it fosters the
enhancement of their peer solidarity and also communication and language skills
(see results of statement 15 and 16 on appendix B). The activity stimulated the
students to share their knowledge and tips with their groupmates on how the
game and the writing should be constructed to be as good as possible. During the
workshop, the students were actively discussing the questions that they should
be using for their game and asked for their peers’ recommendation and ideas.
They also asked their groupmates whether or not their grammar on the questions
was wrong, hoping for a correction from their mates who had a better
understanding and knowledge about it so that the best result could be presented
to other groups at the end of the activity. Another positive aspect from the
activity is that the students who have a better knowledge at English could
directly (or even indirectly) teach his/her friends who haven’t yet understood,
which potentially leveraged the language learning process.

The students have also grown a positive attitude towards the game and the
activity involving the usage of games. The students felt a sense of satisfaction
upon completing the creation their game due to several aspects of the game
itself (see statement 1 on appendix B). Students felt that the game was very
helpful for them in the terms of learning purpose as it provided them a multiple
support (see statement 3 on appendix B). Games give them visual, textual, and
audio aids which could help stimulate the students’ ideas and imagination on
themes, characters, stories, questions, etc. that they would like to create. As
the game’s default language is also English, it could also enhance their English
skill indirectly. The students would also like to share the game template and their
created game with others due to its positive factors and usefulness (see
statement 9 and 10 on appendix B). Interestingly, the students showed a very
positive response to the idea of applying the usage of game for learning in
school/university setting (see statement 14 on appendix B). The main reason was
that students felt that using game as a learning medium was more fun and
interesting due to the aforementioned positive factors than the conventional
learning method.

Gamification and Learning 159

Third, the game has also been perceived as a helpful medium by the students in
aiding them to practice descriptive writing. The game has provided more than
enough support such as visual, textual, and audio aids which have been stated
above for them to work on. In summary, students find it helpful, exciting, and
fulfilling as it meets their needs for practicing descriptive writing which has been
proved by Statement 4 (This game is helpful for me to practice descriptive
writing) for being the most highest-scored statement of all.

There were also some aspects in the study that hamper the students’ progress.
The first one was the students’ knowledge about the game. They are less familiar
with the game that sometimes it could slow their progress down (see statement
2 on appendix B). This was understandable in the writer’s perspective as they
were not from game technology major. The second aspect was the students’
knowledge of the descriptive writing itself. The students did not learn the
subject well enough that they had trouble at arranging and making the
descriptions of the questions at some occasions. However, the problems above
were not major and with a bit of practice and familiarity on the matters above,
the writer believes that the hindrances could be negated completely.

The result of this study is also similarly related to Murniati & Sanjaya’s study
(2015), where students also encountered some technical encounters related to
the students’ familiarity with the game, but there was nothing major and did not
diminish the study’s findings that students felt the game was interesting and also
useful to learn a subject matter, which is English.

With regard to the conclusions above, the writer would like to incorporate some
suggestions for further study about the implementation of game-making in groups
for learning English writing skill, which is descriptive writing in this case. Firstly,
the study was limited in several ways. There was a low number of participants,
which is 24, and this study only used a simple descriptive statistics so it could
not be generalized to other populations. Also, the writer suggests an extensive
research about the full capabilities and features of RPG Maker MV or other game
templates that could be used for English skill learning purposes, mainly writing
skills. For future research, it would be preferable to find out more about the
participants’ English language & writing skills first so that the game could be
constructed to be more suitable to the research’s purposes. Last but not least,
the writer also hope that this study could be used as a reference by the lecturers
or teachers to improve their language teaching using a game as the learning

160 Gamification and Learning

medium, so that students could enjoy and learn English in a fun, modern, and
beneficial method.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ang, C. S., & Zaphiris, P. (2006). Developing enjoyable second language learning
software tools: A computer game paradigm. London, United Kingdom:
Information Science Publishing. Retrieved from http://webftp.nkut.edu.
tw/~084210/Video%20Games%20---Articles/Game_palying_and_language_
learning.pdf

Babbie, E. R. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Thomson

Wadsworth.

Baytak, A., & Land, S. M. (2010). A case study of educational game design by kids
and for kids. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 52425246.
Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S1877042810008931

BECTA. (2001). Computer games in education project. Retrieved from http://

www. becta.org.uk

Bermingham, S., Charlier, N., Dagnino, F., Duggan, J., Earp, J., Kiili, K., . . .
Whitton, N. (2013). Approaches to collaborative game-making for fostering
21st century skills. 7th European Conference on Game Based Learning, 1,
pp. 45-52. Retrieved from http://www.cnr.it/istituti/Allegato_71525.pdf

Blake, J., & Goodman, J. (1999, March/April). Computer-based learning: Games

as an instructional strategy. ABNF Journal, 43. Retrieved from http://www.
savie.ca/SAGE/Articles/1111_1132_Blake_1999.pdf

Bermingham, S., Charlier, N., Dagnino, F., Duggan, J., Earp, J., Kiili, K., . . .
Whitton, N. (2013). Approaches to collaborative game-making for fostering
21st century skills. 7th European Conference on Game Based Learning, 1,
pp. 45-52. Retrieved from Http://www.cnr.it/istituti/Allegato_71525.pdf

Cheng, G. (2009). Using game making pedagogy to facilitate student learning of

interactive multimedia. Australasian Journal of Education Technology,
25(2), 204-220. Retrieved from
https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/viewFile/1150/398

Gamification and Learning 161

Cohen, L. L., Manion, & Morrison, K. (2007). Reserach Methods in Education.
London and New York: Routledge. Retrieved from
https://dspace.utamu.ac.ug/ bitstream/123456789/182/1/Research-
Methods-in-Education-sixth-edition.pdf

Creswell, J. C. (2009). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed

Method Approaches. Lincoln: Sage Publications University of Nebraska.
Retrieved from http://www.ceil-conicet.gov.ar/wp-
content/uploads/2015/10/Creswell-Cap-10.pdf

Dempsey, J. V., Lucassen, B. A., Haynes, L. L., & Casey, M. S. (1996, April 8-12).
Instructional Applications of Computer Games. Annual Meeting of the
American Educational Research Association , 8. Retrieved from
http://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED394500.pdf

Dempsey, J. V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen, B. (1994, February 16-20).

Instructional Gaming: Implications for Instructional Technology. the Annual
Meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology,
3. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED368345.pdf

Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’?

Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, 1(6), 1.
Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-
00190240/document

Earp, J. (2015). A systematic review of the research literature on game making

for learning: Analysis of the full data set. Research Report, Institute for
Educational Technology, National Research Council, Italy. Retrieved from
https://
www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeffrey_Earp/publication/283460359_
Game_Making_for_Learning_A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Research_Liter
ature/links/564db12f08aeafc2aab0014f/Game-Making-for-Learning-A-
Systematic-Review-of-the-Research-
Literature.pdf?origin=publication_detail

Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy.
Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.politicalavenue.
com/108642/GAME-DESIGN-BOOK-COLLECTION/%5BJames_Paul_Gee%5D_
What_Video_Games_Have_to_Teach_Us(BookFi.org).pdf

162 Gamification and Learning

Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research method
(Vol. 1 & 2). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.id/
books?hl=en&lr=&id=byh1AwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=The+Sage+encyc
lopedia+of+qualitative+research+method&ots=LOP0NI3H9s&sig=_EhLzxPJ-
hqlS2utG2PxDxYzh_w&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=The%20Sage%20encyclo
pedia%20of%20qualitative%20research%20method&f=false

Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal

of Technology Education, 7(1). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/
ejournals/JTE/v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html?ref=Sawos.Org

Griffiths, M. (1997). Computer game playing in early adolescence. Youth &

Society, 29(2), 223-237. Retrieved from
ttps://www.researchgate.net/profile/
Mark_Griffiths2/publication/233809231_Computer_Game_Playing_in_Early
_Adolescence/links/53de894e0cf2a76fb668001e.pdf

Griffiths, M. D. (1999). Violent video games and aggression: A review of the

literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4(2), 203-212. Retrieved from
https://
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/19cc/a1acba04e9df87e351372e764172ec62cf46.
pdf

Herz, J. (1997). Joystick nation: How videogames ate our quarters, won our
hearts, and rewired our minds. Boston, Massachusetts, United States of
America: Little Brown & Company.

Johnson, D. M. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New

York: Longman.

Kafai, Y. B. (2006, January). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist
and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture,
1(1), 36-40. Retrieved from http://cmap.upb.edu.co/rid=1GQBQJKR1-
M5SMVC-7HK/19443702-Playing-for-Learning.pdf

Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H.
(1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. Retrieved
from http://nexus.hs-
bremerhaven.de/library.nsf/bf25ab0f47ba5dd785256499006b15a4/30bb62
d76118ded3c12578530056a136/$FILE/CollaborativeLearning.pdf

Gamification and Learning 163

Murniati, C. T., & Sanjaya, R. (2015). The integration of educational game for
collaborative learning. Soegijapranata Catholic University, Semarang.

Natale, M. (2002). The effect of a male-oriented computer gaming culture on

careers in the computer industry. Computers and Society, 32(2), 24-31.

Roberts, T. S. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher

education. Idea Group Publishing. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.
net/profile/Tim_Roberts2/publication/242290346_Computer-Supported_
Collaborative_Learning_in_Higher_Education_An_Introduction/links/00b-
7d5187a4b822e4b000000.pdf

Robertson, J. (2012). Making games in the classroom: Benefits and gender

concern. Computers & Education, 59, 385-398. Retrieved from
http://intervox.
nce.ufrj.br/~tiagoborges/artigos/Artigos%20CAPES/Making%20games%20
in%20the%20classroom%20-%20benefits%20and%20gender%20concerns.pdf

Robertson, J., & Nicholson, K. (2007). Adventure Author: A learning environment

to support creative design. In Proceedings of the 6th international
conference on Interaction design and children (pp. 37-44). Retrieved from
http:// www.flipproject.org.uk/wp-content/papers/p37-robertson.pdf

Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://gamifique.
files.wordpress.com/2011/11/1-rules-of-play-game-design-fundamentals.
pdf

Sanjaya, R., Murniati, C., & Blair, K. L (n.d.). Game Making as A Collaborative
Learning Method. Retrieved from
http://www.vnseameo.org/InternationalConference2017/materials/17_Ri
dwanSanjaya_CeciliaTitiekMurniati_ Fullpaper.pdf

Schacter, J. (n.d.). The Teaching Doctors. Retrieved from

http://www.teachingdoctors.com:
http://www.teachingdoctors.com/home_resources/Products
net/profile/Mark_Griffiths2/publication/233809231_Computer_Game_Playing_
in_Early_Adolescence/links/53de894e0cf2a76fb668001e.pdf

164 Gamification and Learning

Griffiths, M. D. (1999). Violent video games and aggression: A review of the
literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4(2), 203-212. Retrieved from
https://
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/19cc/a1acba04e9df87e351372e764172ec62cf46.
pdf

Herz, J. (1997). Joystick nation: How videogames ate our quarters, won our
hearts, and rewired our minds. Boston, Massachusetts, United States of
America: Little Brown & Company.

Johnson, D. M. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New

York: Longman.

Kafai, Y. B. (2006, January). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist
and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture,
1(1), 36-40. Retrieved from http://cmap.upb.edu.co/rid=1GQBQJKR1-M5S-
MVC-7HK/19443702-Playing-for-Learning.pdf

Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K., Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., & Muukkonen, H.
(1999). Computer supported collaborative learning: A review. Retrieved
from http://nexus.hs-
bremerhaven.de/library.nsf/bf25ab0f47ba5dd785256499006b15a4/30bb62
d76118ded3c12578530056a136/$FILE/CollaborativeLearning.pdf

Murniati, C. T., & Sanjaya, R. (2015). The integration of educational game for
collaborative learning. Soegijapranata Catholic University, Semarang.

Natale, M. (2002). The effect of a male-oriented computer gaming culture on

careers in the computer industry. Computers and Society, 32(2), 24-31.

Roberts, T. S. (2005). Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher

education. Idea Group Publishing. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.
net/profile/Tim_Roberts2/publication/242290346_Computer-Supported_
Collaborative_Learning_in_Higher_Education_An_Introduction/links/00b-
7d5187a4b822e4b000000.pdf

Robertson, J. (2012). Making games in the classroom: Benefits and gender

concern. Computers & Education, 59, 385-398. Retrieved from
http://intervox.

Gamification and Learning 165

 nce.ufrj.br/~tiagoborges/artigos/Artigos%20CAPES/Making%20games%20
in%20the%20classroom%20-%20benefits%20and%20gender%20concerns.pdf

Robertson, J., & Nicholson, K. (2007). Adventure Author: A learning environment

to support creative design. In Proceedings of the 6th international
conference on Interaction design and children (pp. 37-44). Retrieved from
http:// www.flipproject.org.uk/wp-content/papers/p37-robertson.pdf

Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals.
Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://gamifique.
files.wordpress.com/2011/11/1-rules-of-play-game-design-fundamentals.
pdf

Sanjaya, R., Murniati, C., & Blair, K. L (n.d.). Game Making as A Collaborative
Learning Method. Retrieved from
http://www.vnseameo.org/InternationalConference2017/materials/17_Ri
dwanSanjaya_CeciliaTitiekMurniati_ Fullpaper.pdf

Schacter, J. (n.d.). The Teaching Doctors. Retrieved from

http://www.teachingdoctors.com:
http://www.teachingdoctors.com/home_resources/Products

A VR Based Educational Game for Studying

Mathematics
T. Brenda Chandrawati
Erdhi Widyarto Nigroho

ABSTRACT
Virtual reality is a technology that illustrates three dimensional
environment simulated by computer. Virtual reality technology is
widely used in various fields, such as medical field, architecture,
entertainment and others. One example of applying virtual reality is
using the game. In the game, players will be brought to play in a
virtual environment so that players will feel different sensations as
if they seem to be in the real world.

166 Gamification and Learning

 Mathematics lesson is a lesson that most students are not interested
in. Many educational experts have sought to simplify and make
students love this lesson. However, the effort has still a lot of
obstacles. Virtual reality technology has been attempted for
mathematics learning where players will be engaged into the virtual
world of mathematics. Accordingly, the player is expected to be easy
to accept a math lesson.

Keyword: virtual reality, mathematics, learning, game

INTRODUCTION
In the last recent years, technology has been rapidly developed and available for
various fields, one of which is virtual reality technology. Virtual reality is a
technology that demonstrates a three-dimensional environment simulated by a
computer and one can interact with that environment. In virtual reality, the
environment is actually imitated and only exists in imagination.

Virtual reality technology is widely used in various fields, such as medical field,
architecture, entertainment and others. One example of using virtual reality is
in the game. When virtual reality technology is used in the game then the user
feels as though they are in the game world.

This situation can benefit from creating a game that can facilitate the user to
understand a particular subject that is considered difficult by most students i.e.
the math game. According to Turmudi, educational experts and mathematics
education experts have spent for many years in attaining a goal that mathematics
can be well mastered by students. Nevertheless, the efforts show that not many
students in each class favor the mathematics [1]. Then, the best solution in
understanding the basic concepts of mathematics is presented by using games
with virtual reality technology.

LITERATURE REVIEW
A. Virtual Reality Technology

Virtual reality technology enables one to simulate a real object by using a

computer generating a three-dimensional atmosphere that makes the user as if
physically involved. The virtual reality works as follows: a user sees a pseudo-

Gamification and Learning 167

world, which is actually a dynamic image; then, through a speaker or headphone
device, the user hears a realistic sound; by the headset, glove and walker, each
user movement will be monitored by a system that will give the appropriate
reaction so that the user feels in a real situation, both physically and
psychologically.

Virtual Reality Elements [2]

1. Virtual world, the content of a given medium that comes in the form of screen
play or script. In this element, the user will experience the virtual world.
2. Immersion, the existing sensation in an environment. Immersion is divided
into two types: mental immersion and physical immersion.
3. Sensory feedback, information that is displayed to the user’s senses about the
virtual world, sensory feedback can be visual, audio or touch.
4. Interactivity, the virtual world that response to user action in real time.

B. Serious Game

Video game is a medium of learning that mixes interesting pictures and sounds.
Interesting pictures and sounds involving hand interaction to play games will give
a player pleasure, and will earn good learning outcomes. Such games are called
the serious game; they are not only used for fun but also used for the purpose of
developing skills and habits.

The definition of a serious game differs from one researcher to another.

According to Vinay, a serious game is defined as a software system that is a
combination of serious dimensions, the goal is not for fun and gaming dimension,
which has the element of game design and modeling concepts, game structure,
game techniques and GUI [3].

Masakazu explains that the serious game was first mentioned in a book written
by Clark C. Apt. In the book, the serious game was an effective game for
education and training. Explanation of the serious game had been written before
the computer game or video game was popular in the market. At the same time,
simulators and simulation systems were used for educational needs, training,
training support and strategic planning. After Game Developer Conference in
2004, serious games became popular and flourished in various areas. Masakazu
also explains that basically entertainment games and serious games are the same
computer games but have different usage [4].

168 Gamification and Learning

C. Review of VR Game
Table 1.1
Game Education
No Name Story Segment Arts Interface Opportunity

1 Finding Adventure in Kids Japanese gamepad / To educate

searching Anime touchscreen shape of
Item space

2 Temple Endless Teenagers 3D touchpad To introduce

Run running Animation letters or
but not shape of
detail space

3 Road rage Driving car Kids Draft touchpad To introduce

Animation letters or
shape of
space

4 Dragon Card Game Teenagers Japanese touchpad All types of

Front Battle Anime education

5 Cosmos Spaceship Public 3D touch pad To introduce

Warfare Battle Graphic letters or
detail shape of
space

6 Adventure Adventure of Kids Japanese touchpad To educate

Cat RPG Anime introductory
and simple
math

7 Shinoko Adventure of Kids Japanese touchpad To educate

RPG Anime introductory
and simple
math

METHODOLOGY
The selected research objects are elementary school s From the design process
to the game played by a user, it will go through several stages :

1. Determine the game genre to be created, in this research the serious game
is selected as one of the genre of games that have been known.
2. Selection of tools to be used in the game.

Gamification and Learning 169

 Selected tools will be used to create assets, including the selection of sounds
and tools that will be used to develop the game.
3. Gameplay formulation
Gameplay is a pattern or mechanism used to manage the interaction between
players and games created. Gameplay also arranges for players to
experience a fun game.
4. Preparation of assets and design level
The concept of all the characters and grouping of difficulty levels is arranged at
this stage. It aims to get players to experience the optimal play
5. Development
At this stage all characters and assets begin to be enhanced in full development
and all elements are integrated.
6. Alpha / close beta test
This stage is done to determine whether it has been able to provide the player
experience in accordance with expectations as well as to detect whether
there is a technical problem. students with age range 6-7 years around
Semarang city.

DISCUSSION
From Table 1.1, the opportunity to educate is the introduction of space and
figure form. A simple game on virtual reality game is good for the introduction
of space shape, such as rectangular shape, triangle circle and so forth. This game
model is “Endless Run” like “Temple Run”, “Sub waver” and others. The player
will walk looking for a square shape. When the shape appears, the player must
shoot the square shape. If the shot misses, it will reduce the player’s life. The
player’s life has 3 (three) chances, then the game will be finished. If the shoot
hits the target, the player will score 10. Here is the game introduction of space
shape based on virtual reality

170 Gamification and Learning

 Figure 1. VR Game Display on Space Shape

Players will be brought into the 3D world so it will make a child like being in the
real world. Next, the child will interact with how to find the shape of space
learned. In accordance with the principle of learning, learning will be more
successful with the interaction between players with the subject taught.
Likewise, the player will get learning over and over again and feel happy and
challenged by searching for the appropriate shape of space to get points and
avoid loss of life.

The weakness of this game is the player cannot choose any form of space, so his
life will not run out and the game is never finished even if the player does not
add the score. For that reason, it is necessary that the rules are given time
constraints. In addition, selecting the exact shape will add points and additional
time, so the game will be more challenging

CONCLUSION
Games with VR base bring players into the virtual world so it is possible to include
the learning process, especially math lessons

Learning the introduction of the numbers and letters can be applied easily to the
VR-based Game

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The result of this study is a grant from the ministry of Research and Technology
Research Indonesia for applied product research.

Gamification and Learning 171

 REFERENCES

Mulyono Abdurrahman 2003, “Pendidikan bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar “,

Jakarta: Rineka Cipta hal. 252

LaValle, Steven M, “Virtual Reality”, Cambridge University Press, 2017

Vasudevamurt, Vinay Bhargav and Alexander Uskov, “Serious Game Engines :

Analysis and Applications”, Proceeding of 2015 IEEE International
Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT), 2015, Pages: 440 -
445

Furuichi, Masakazu, Megumi Aibara and Kazuki Yanagisawa, “Design and

Implementation of Serious Games for Training and Education”, Proceeding
of 2014 UKACC International Conference on Control (CONTROL), 2014,
Pages: 691 - 695

172 Gamification and Learning

LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES
FOR SPECIFIC DOMAINS
iPon: A Personal Finance Mobile Application Software
that Encourages Smart Money Management and
Financial Skills
JC DOCTOR
MR MITSCHEK
KM PALIZA
JT TIONG
GM SABILE

ABSTRACT
iPon is an educative application which aims to teach its three target
users which are the students, employees, and families on how to
properly budget their own allowance in an entertaining way and also
with the use of their smartphones. The application is consist of six
different features such as Expenses, Tips, Budget Guide, Notes,
Calendar, and Summary of Savings. It also allows the user to budget
their allowance from daily, weekly, or monthly.

This application is exclusive only for android operating system. The

developers made sure that the application’s contents are clear and
easy to understand. The user will just have to interact with the
application in order to monitor and track his or expenses and savings.
The application will provide a notification for the user that can serve
as a reminder, and a recommendation so that the user will always
have to prioritize his or her savings.

The software used in creating the iPon is with the help of Android
Studio, Adobe Photoshop CS5, Adobe Flash Professional, and an online
database called Firebase.

The result of the evaluation that the proponents conducted, resulted

as Moderately Agree with the five categories such as appearance,
structure and navigation, content, usability, and designs.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 175

 Keywords: Budget Tracker, Financial Education, Financial Literacy, Mobile
Application, Money Management

INTRODUCTION
Money plays an important role to one’s life, it is also now a part of our daily
needs. Without money you won’t be able to buy your basic necessities, you can’t
survive for too long without having a money. Most people fail to balance between
saving and enjoying their money. Enjoying money can satisfy us in different ways,
it gives us joy, excitement, and happiness, but isn’t it more satisfying if we enjoy
our money while we are saving too? We can fulfill our needs while learning how
to save from our own money as well.

iPon is a Filipino term that means “to save”, where basically is the main function
of the application. Aside from money management, the proponents are also
offering an educative application for the users, where they can also learn the
importance of properly managing their allowance and the benefits that they can
get from it.

Nowadays, mobile phones are a big part of our lives, especially for the youth. It
gives us the convenience and efficiency that we need. We can do all things
through the use of our mobile phones. It will be less time consuming since all that
we need are already in our mobile phones. Different helpful applications are now
available for downloading.

Mobile phones have different types of operating systems such as Windows, iOS,
and Android, but android is the most popular one, since it is more affordable than
other operating system. It is marked as the top mobile operating system in the
Philippines in December 2013 according to Cameron Peebles. It is said in the
published report that Filipinos prefer Android than any other operating system.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

FOREIGN LITERATURE
The 11 Best UK Apps for Money Management and Personal Finance.

176 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

Fearn, 2016
Many of us have a number of different bank accounts, such as one for personal
spending, another for savings, and another still dedicated to paying off bills. Even
if it’s just remembering all of your passwords and login details, you’ll know that
managing all of them effectively can be a struggle, especially when all you want
is an overview of your balances. That’s where Money Dashboard comes into the
mix. Compatible with all UK bank and credit card companies, it allows you to
view the balances of all your bank accounts instantly and aims to help you make
more informed decisions by identifying your spending habits.

Money Dashboard can also provide the user the money management that they
needed which can be used for personal spending with the bonus of being educated
about the importance of money management.

Best budgeting apps: 7 apps to take control of your finances.

OnTrees, 2016
OnTrees is the budgeting app from MoneySuperMarket and it makes keeping track
of your money nice and simple. OnTrees works with major UK banks in order for
you to track exactly what is coming in and going out of your current account,
savings accounts and credit cards, in one place with one login. This app sorts your
transactions into colorful categories so you can see where you are spending and
what you could save on. It also delivers detailed information about your spending
habits with charts and icons. OnTrees is available to download for Android and
iOS.

OnTrees and iPon are both available for Android users. The feature that is the
same with our application is that it can provide different categories on where
your moneys are being spent.

By doing away in the ‘accounting jargon’, KashFlow has created an

app for the ordinary user.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 177

KashFlow, 2015
Moneytrackin’ is a free online web app that allows you to track all your expenses
and income easily and without effort. The app intends to be a simple yet powerful
online budget management tool that offers you a clear view of your financial
situation. One interesting feature of the app is sharing and collaboration. If you
are working with a family member or your roommate to keep budgets in line, you
can do so with ease and work together on the same account to reach financial
goals.

iPon and Moneytrackin’ will both help the user to manage their money properly.
It will both let the user to keep track of their expenses.

Money Management Skills for Youth.

Money Management International, 2016

It is never too early to start teaching children money management and financial
skills they will need for life. With our advice articles you can teach kids the
importance of basic mathematics, financial goal setting, and responsible money
management. Find the resources and money management tips for kids that you
need to raise your children to be financially successful adults.

At an early age, kids can now benefit by starting to learn how to manage their
own money. It is much easier for them if they can have an application that can
provide them the proper tips and guide on how to properly handle their allowance
and for them to know how value to save money. This features will also be offered
with our application.

LOCAL LITERATURE

Online Tools You Can Use To Monitor Your Budget.

Denise Foz, 2016

The Philippines ranked 68th in the world in terms of financial literacy in a recent
study conducted by the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Philippines was
revealed to lack a national strategy for financial education. The study was further

178 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

supported by a 2014 research by MasterCard, which indicated that Filipinos score
low on financial literacy. The Philippines ranked 8th among Asia Pacific countries.
Filipinos should start to educate themselves and make use of available financial
tools to help manage their finances wisely.

With that being said, the proponents came up with an idea of developing a tool
that can help Filipinos manage their monthly allowance. Aside from managing,
the application will also provide tips and guides where they can learn from.

The Philippine Online Chronicles.

Rachel Yapchiongco, 2014

TRAIL WALLET is a travel expense tracker ideal for people who love to travel.
Trail Wallet can help you determine if you’re sticking to your budget or spending
too much than previously planned. This app tells you if you still have enough
money to spend on your trip. It tells you how much you spent and available funds.
Just choose your home currency and convert your money to desired foreign
currency. Set a daily budget then add expenses each time to get a bill or receipt.
Organize expenses according to items such as accommodation, food, transport,
miscellaneous, etc. Customize by creating color coded categories. At the end of
your trip, you’ll be able to see how much you have spent. It features Twitter and
Facebook support. You can also email CSV reports directly to the app.

The said application can be used specifically for travelling purposes. The same as
our application, they both set a budget that must be used, and lets the user add
the amount of expenses he spent. Compared to proponents application that there
are proper tips and guide on how to properly handle their allowance and for them
to know how value to save money.

Want to manage your finances better? Here are some apps.

News A, 2014
This app downloads and consolidates all your financial records, including your
checking accounts, savings accounts or credit cards (if your bank is included in
its list of banks). All you have to do is just refresh your account. This way, you do

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 179

not have to log on to different online banking sites just to see your balance. If
your bank is not among those that Koku can connect with, you can import your
statements into Koku. The app also provides an analysis of your income and
spending habits. Since it automatically syncs to iCloud, you will be able to access
your account from anywhere using your Apple device.

Like any other application it also provides the use of credit cards and bank
accounts, but the down part is that it is only available for iOS users. The
proponents think is more hassle to use their app since there are lot of users used
an android phones.

Free Apps That Keep Your Budget in Line

MoneyMax.ph., 2015
Who needs a personal accountant if you have Expensify on your phone? This
popular app categorizes, tags and groups expenses into a report, which you can
also save as PDF, for easy report submission. It has SmartScan technology that
automatically reads receipt details for you, bank and credit card import that
automatically pulls your transactions into your account, free flight alerts plus
automatic expense report based on itinerary, and more cool features gets rid of
any manual entry, saving you a lot of time and energy.

iPon also helps the user in tracking their expenses or where their money goes.
This application also helps you to manage your allowance by not wasting a lot of
time and energy.

METHODS
It is all about the overall flow and operation of the application, including the
technical aspects of it. This also includes the basic structure of the application
and the software that are used in developing it.

In creating the design of iPon we considered different factors that can help to
the effectiveness of the application for the user, these factors are the color, the
type of text, the structure, and the positioning of different components like the
texts and buttons. We chose the colors light blue and white because it is more
pleasant for the user’s vision since it is a good color combination. We also used a

180 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

bigger font size because we are considering the capability of the user’s eyesight.
The structure of the application is not crowded because we want the user to
become familiarized with the application easily, some applications that has a
crowded structure are also complicated to use. The positions of the components
are easy to find and we also put labels in the buttons that we used so that it is
more understandable for the users. All of these are done with the use of the
software Adobe Photoshop CS5.

For the function of the application, the user has to create an account using a
valid email address. The account will serve as a unique identifier in storing the
data and information that the user will input. Data such as the user’s full name,
daily/weekly/monthly allowance, notes, and the user’s expenses. The full name
of the user will be the application’s user profile. The allowance that the user will
enter will be automatically computed according to the fixed percentages
provided by the application, this is also the main feature of the application,
which is to provide the breakdown of the user’s allowance which can serve as
their guide in their daily, weekly, and monthly expenses. For additional
convenience, the additional feature of the application is that the user can add
and delete notes, this is for listing purposes where instead of writing down your
grocery lists on a piece of paper. Lastly, the user can be able to track his/her
expenses whenever he/she will input the specific amount he/she spend
depending on what category it is. There is a provided feature where the user can
view the summary of expenses he spend. All of the functions are done with the
use of Android Studio and Firebase.

An animation about money budgeting will also be provided by the application for
additional entertainment and for educational purposes. The animation is done
with the use of Adobe Flash Professional CS6.

Research Paradigm
Agile Methodology is an alternative to traditional project management where
emphasis is placed on empowering people to collaborate and make team
decisions in addition to continuous planning, continuous testing and continuous
integration. It is also a group of software development methods in which
requirements and solutions evolve through collaboration between self-
organizing, cross-functional teams.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 181

 Figure 1. Agile Methodology

Requirements
The definition of requirements in agile methodology is to come up with
Requirement Specification document or documents. The aim is to define the
requirements in as clear and as detail manner as possible. Normally in order to
capture, collect and gather the requirements. The success or the failure of the
software project being created will depend on the first phase of waterfall model,
which is the requirements.

The requirements that the proponents did for the system is to analyze the
different software that can be the most applicable in developing the application.

The proponents have decided to use the software Android Studio for the functions
of the application, and for the design the proponents used Photoshop CS6. The
proponents also gathered different information needed from the target users
through a survey with the help from professionals.

182 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

Design
In agile methodology, design is about the activity before the programming. It is
about stylizing the software application. It is all about the activity involved in
conceptualizing, framing, and implementing the solutions for the progress of the
application being developed. The main purpose if this stage is to create a
blueprint that will satisfy all documented requirements, then to identify all
inputs, processes and outputs needed

The proponents all agreed to use Photoshop CS6 in conceptualizing for the
concept of the application. The framework for the software process will all be
planned in this phase.

Construction
Construction is all about the coding, verification, and debugging of the software.
This phase is the most detailed and complicated work, since this is where every
functions and processes of the application will all depend. Its purpose is to
implement the requirements from the design phase to the software.

The proponents decided to use the Android Studio as a software for creating the
function for the application, basically for implementing and debugging the codes
for the system to work well as planned.

Testing
In this phase, it is the attempt to execute the program even if it is partially
complete. By testing your software’s process, you can determine the quality and
the function you are about to provide for the future users. Although testing
cannot fully identify the defects of the application being tested.

The proponents’ strategy is to test the software every time a progress is added,
in this way the bugs or the error can be determined ahead of time and can be
fixed. By testing the application, the developers can also identify what else needs
to be added and what should be polished more.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 183

Deployment
The deployment or release phase is about all the activities that makes the
application complete and ready for use. Basically it is the finished project where
it can now be functional according to what is planned.

This is where the proponents will upload the finished project to the site where
it can now be downloaded and ready for the users.

Conceptual Framework

Figure 2. Conceptual Framework

As presented, the framework has three component: input, process and output.
In order to develop the Android Application “iPon”, it is necessary to include the
following inputs: gathered analysis and information, software needed, layout of
design, color combination and programming tools. Given these inputs, the
different processes involves are system design, coding, testing and deployment.
After given processes, the development of iPon money budgeting application will
be the output.

Project Development
The designs used in the application are shown through a screenshots with the
explanations down below.

184 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

Screenshots

Figure 3 Sign in and Sign up

The user should have an account first in order to use the application, this is the
only part that is needed to have an internet connection. The account will serve
as a unique identifier so that the information and the data that are being inputted
will store in one database. Therefore, each user can have a different access in
using the application. The redundancy of the functions and data can be avoided.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 185

 Figure 4. Welcome Page

After the registration, the welcome page is displayed. This page allows the user
to view the About Us, About the Application, and the user can be able to watch a
short animation about the importance of budgeting.

186 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 5. About the Application and About Us

About iPon displays the different goals that the application wants to expect from
the user. The first priority of the application is to teach the user to save 20% from
their allowance. The whole application focuses in reminding the user to spend
less and save more, aside from it, this can also serve as a modern budget reminder
through the help of a daily notification that the user can receive every day in a
specific time. About Us displays the name of the proponents, their group name,
and the school they are studying.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 187

 Figure 6. Choose budget breakdown

This page is the choosing of the user’s budget breakdown, this can be from daily,
weekly, or monthly. Since not all users are receiving an allowance every day,
every week, or just every month. That is why this application is providing three
different options that the user can choose from.

188 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 7.. Enter your allowance

The user should input their allowance according to their budget breakdown
whether it is daily, weekly, or monthly. The inputted allowance are automatically
computed using a fixed percentages and this serves as their guide for budgeting.

Figure 8. Choose category

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 189

 The application’s target user are the students, employees, and families. Each
category provides different expenses for different users, so that the application
can satisfy all the needs of each of them.

Figure 9. Student’s guide

For the student’s guide, the user can view a progress bar where he or she can
have a guide of computed amount for each expenses.The user can also view the
transparency of the computation in the information button placed at the upper
right of the page. There is also a brief explanation for the purpose of each
expenses, the percentages are also indicated beside of each category. Aside from
this, there is also an indicated recommendation above wherein there is a text
that shows for who the application can be more appropriate.

190 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 10. Employee’s guide

For the employee’s guide, the user can view a progress bar where he or she can
have a guide of computed amount for each expenses.The user can also view the
transparency of the computation in the information button placed at the upper
right of the page. There is a brief explanation for the purpose of each expenses,
the percentages are also indicated beside of each category. Aside from this, there
is also an indicated recommendation above wherein there is a text that shows for
who the application can be more appropriate.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 191

 Figure 11. Family’s guide

For the family’s guide, the user can view a progress bar where he or she can have
a guide of computed amount for each expenses.The user can also view the
transparency of the computation in the information button placed at the upper
right of the page.There is a brief explanation for the purpose of each expenses,
the percentages are also indicated beside of each category. Aside from this, there
is also an indicated recommendation above wherein there is a text that shows for
who the application can be more appropriate.

192 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 12. Home Page

This is where the user can view most of the functions and features of the
application. In the home page, the user can be able to change the settings of the
application and can also log out in this page if he or she wants to. The button
labeled as Bought Something leads the user to the inputting of expenses. Every
time the user has inputted something, the application automatically recorded it.
This can help the user to track and monitor his or her expenses. The application
has also provided six different features for the users.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 193

 Figure 13. Inputting of Expenses

The user can be able to input a specific amount of expenses that he or she wanted
to. A real time date is also automatically indicated. Beside is an amount of guide
that is based on the previous progress bar shown above, in this way, the user can
be able to monitor if he or she exceeded the specific amount that the user should
be spending. The user can also view the allowance that he or she has inputted,
and the savings he or she is making, and also his or her total expenses.

194 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 14. Deleting of expenses

There are times that the user just wanted to experiment in inputting his or her
expenses just to test it. That is why the application provided a delete option for
the user so that his or her expenses will restart and will go back to zero. A dialog
box also appears if the user is going to delete something from the expenses.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 195

 Figure 15. View of expenses

The view of expenses has an indicated date that depends when the user inputted
his or her expense. The total amount of expenses can also be viewed. The
expenses can be divided according to daily, weekly, monthly, or yearly.

196 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 16. Summary of expenses and Recommendations

The user can be able to view his or her summary of expenses through a pie chart,
the biggest part is where the user has spent the most. The user can also check
the recommendation given by the application, if what should be prioritized and
what should be lessen, which are shown through a dialog box.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 197

 Figure 17. Calendar

A calendar is provided for the efficiency of the users, they are able to input an
expenses in advance, since the calendar can allow to select a date even if it is
not the current day. After clicking it, it will direct them to the inputting of
expenses shown above.

198 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 18. Notes

Notes can be the user’s modern grocery list. It works the same as to writing in
papers, because the user can be able to add and delete whatever he or she listed.
A dialog box appears to ask if he or she really wants to delete something from
the notes.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 199

 Figure.19. Tips

The application provides fifteen different tips that can give more encouragement
to the user to budget their allowance. Aside from helping or guiding the user in
properly handling their allowance, it can also teach the user to save money and
avoid impulse buying.

200 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 Figure 20. Savings

In savings, the user can view his or her savings daily, monthly and weekly depends
on the category that they choose. In this feature, the user can monitor how much
did he or she save per day, per month or per week.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 201

 Figure 21. Settings

This application has a setting button, where the user can change their allowance,
his or her budget breakdown, and the category that they chose.

Development Planning
It is a very important part of developing an application. If it is not done correctly,
it might end up in some serious mistakes, the proponents cannot also achieve the
application that they want to develop. The planned requirements will also not be
able to accomplish and will just result to a huge waste of time and money.

202 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

Software Suited for Development
The proponents believed that there are other factors that you should consider in
order to achieve an effective and useful application. The following are the
applications that the proponents used to produce the design and the coding of
the system:

• Android Studio
Android Studio is a software that you can use for the coding of the
application which will run in an android devices. It is also the official IDE
Android Application Development. This software has a rich layout editor
that you can use for drag and drop theme editing. It also code templates
that can help you build common application features.

• Adobe Photoshop CS5

Adobe Photoshop is the predominant photo editing and manipulation
software on the market. Its uses range from full featured editing of large
batches of photos to creating intricate digital paintings and drawings that
mimic those done by hand.

• Adobe Flash Professional CS6

It is an authoring tool that you can use to create games, applications, and
other content that responds to user interaction. Flash projects can include
simple animations, video content, complex user interfaces, applications,
and everything in between. In general, individual projects created with
Flash Professional are called applications (or SWF applications), even
though they might only contain basic animation. You can make media-rich
applications by including pictures, sound, video, and special effects.

• Firebase
It is a mobile and web application platform with tools and infrastructure
designed to help developers build high-quality apps. Firebase is made up
of complementary features that developers can mix-and-match to fit their
needs. Firebase’s initial product was a real-time database, which provides
an API that allows developers to store and sync data across multiple
clients.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 203

Requirements Analysis
The software that are needed should be capable in developing the application, it
should also be suited for the devices that the proponents’ are using, in order to
avoid wasting of time.

Blueprint of the structure should be handed to all of the proponents to avoid

misunderstandings with the plans. The functions and the designs of each view of
the application should meet the requirements.

Proponents should expect to do a sudden change in design and coding during the
testing of the application. They should also expect to have an analysis each test
that they make.

Languages Used
The most suited programming language that the proponents used is the Java. It
is a kind of programming language that has a general purpose, it is also designed
to only have a few implementation dependencies as possible. Since the
application has a broad functions, Java helped the proponents to lessen the
complication in developing.

Evaluation of the Projects

Respondents of the Study

The respondents of the evaluation of the study are the students from high school
to college who are studying at De La Salle University - Dasmariñas, employees
who are single and does not own any property, and lastly a starting and growing
families who has a four member in total. They are the main targets of this study
because the proponents want to help them not to waste their money for
unnecessary things. The proponents let the respondents to evaluate the money
budgeting application system according to the application’s appearance, its
structure and navigation, the application’s content, its usability, and lastly its
design.

The students from senior high school to college and the employees also answered
a survey form that answer the details that are needed in developing the
application such as the amount of their usual daily allowance, the budget
breakdown of their allowance for each category of expenses so that the

204 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

proponents can have the proper allotted percentage that they should use in
computing for the user’s guide, lastly is a question about the willingness of the
respondents in downloading the application. The details of the expenses of the
families are came from the advices of the financial analysts.

Research Instruments and Techniques

The proponents distributed a survey forms and evaluation forms as their data
gathering instrument to collect the information that they need in the study. The
result of the conducted survey served as the basis for the application, if it still
needs some improvement or changes. The respondents are asked about the
application’s user friendliness, effectiveness of the application, design of the
application, and if it is worth using and downloading.

Survey and evaluation forms are used to test the validity and reliability of data
gathering at the proposed application. The value of results depends heavily on
the sincerity, truthfulness and objective of the respondents.

Data Gathering Procedure

Data collection is the process of gathering and measuring information on variables
of interest which enables one to answer stated research questions, test
hypotheses, and evaluate outcomes. The goal for all data collection is to capture
quality evidence that translate to reach data analysis and allows the building of
a convincing and credible answer to questions that have been posed.

The proponents collected the data needed from the respondents through the use
of the data gathering instrument which is the survey. The results are tallied after
the survey was conducted.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Statistical Treatment of Data

The proponents tallied the answers of the respondents in the survey conducted,
the details gathered are used in developing the application. This survey answered
how much of their allowance are they putting in savings, meals, transportation,
other expenses, and house obligation for the employees.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 205

The proponents tallied the scores given by the respondents who are the students,
employees, and families who evaluated the evaluation form. This helped the
proponents to define whether the application is effective and efficient enough
for the students, employees, and families who used it. In getting the total
evaluation grade of the respondents for each category, which are the
application’s appearance, its structure and navigation, the application’s content,
its usability, and the design. The proponents computed the sum of each of the
ratings according to what the question is. To get the average, the proponents
used the formula below wherein (A) is the number of respondents who answered
for the evaluation.

Different rates per categories are shown using a table below. The inputted
number are already tallied. There are five tables that show the answers of the
respondents with the evaluation form. The ratings are based by putting numbers
from 1-5 wherein 5 is the highest and 1 is the lowest.

1 - Strongly Disagree 3 – Agree 5 – Strongly Agree 2 – Disagree

4 – Moderately Agree

Evaluation
TABLE 1. According to Appearance
5 4 3 2 1

Layout of the colors, fonts, and images 28 54 16 2

are consistent

Text is clearly understandable 36 47 16 1

Application layout is balanced and 27 53 19 1

clear
According to the evaluation that we conducted, 54 out of 100 respondents
moderately agree that the layout of the colors, fonts and images are consistent
throughout the application. 47 respondents moderately agree that the text is
clearly understandable, and 53 respondents moderately agree that the
application layout is balanced and clear.

206 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 TABLE.2 . According to Structure and Navigation
5 4 3 2 1

The content of the application is 23 51 25 1

organized
The purpose of page is easily understood 33 49 16 1 1
The content of the application is organized and out of the 100 respondents, 51 of
them moderately agree with it, which means that the structure of the application
such as the placing of the buttons, arrangement of the content, and its sensitivity
when navigating. While 49 of the respondents moderately agree that the purpose
of the pages are easily understood, it means that the uses easily gets how does
the application works.

TABLE 3. According to Content

5 4 3 2 1

The information is correct and current 32 48 20

The content is sufficient to meet user’s 37 46 17

needs and expectation
The table shows the average rating per criteria in According to Content. 48 out
of the 100 respondent moderately agree that the information of the content is
correct and current, where it means that the application is consistent in giving
its function as to what is expected. While 46 of them moderately agree that the
content is sufficient to meet user’s needs and expectations, it means that the
data and information gathered according to the surveys and interviews are the
same with what the application did.

TABLE 4. According to Usability

5 4 3 2 1

All components of the application are 28 58 13 1

functional

The application is accessible for the 36 49 13 2

authorized

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 207

According to usability, all components of the application are functional and 58
out of the 100 respondents moderately agreed with it, while 49 moderately agree
with the usability of the application says that the application is accessible for the
authorized users.

TABLE 5. According to Design

5 4 3 2 1

User Friendliness 44 49 6 1

Usable to the intended audience 45 44 9 2

Simple and clear 48 44 8

According to the evaluation that the proponents conducted, 4.36% says that our
app is user friendly, 4.32% of the respondent says that the app is usable to the
intended audience, and the remaining 4.4% according to the evaluation the app
is so simple and clear.

Survey

TABLE 5. Daily Allowance of Senior High School Students

Allowance Number of Respondents
50 - 100 2
100 - 150 5
150 – 200 9
200 – 250 14
250 – 300 10
300 – 350 4
More than 350 6
The Table 5, shows the daily allowance of the fifty respondents of the senior high
school students. It shows that fourteen respondents has an allowance ranging
from 200-250 pesos. While two of them have responded that they only get an
allowance ranging from 50-100 pesos.

208 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 TABLE 6. Daily Allowance of College Students
Allowance Number of Respondents
50 - 100

100 - 150 1
150 – 200 7
200 – 250 20
250 – 300 10
300 – 350 7
More than 350 5
The Table 6, shows the daily allowance of college students. It shows that the
highest number of respondents has an allowance of 200-250 pesos every day. The
lowest number of respondents has an allowance of 100-150 pesos per day. TABLE
7. Daily Allowance of Employees
Allowance Number of Respondents
50 - 100

100 - 150 4
150 – 200 2
200 – 250 6
250 – 300 2
300 – 350 10
More than 350 26

The Table 7, shows the daily allowance of the 50 respondents of the employees.
It shows that the highest number of respondents has an allowance of more than
350 pesos per day, both the allowance of 150-200 pesos and 250-300 pesos has a
total number of two respondents out of 50.

TABLE 8. Daily Budget Breakdown of Allowance of Senior High School Students

Categories Allotted Percentage

Savings 20%

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 209

 Meals 40%

Transportation 25%

Other Expenses 15%

The Table 8, shows the daily budget breakdown of allowance of the 50
respondents of the senior high school students. It shows that the highest allotted
percentage of respondent’s daily budget breakdown is for meals, 40% of their
allowance per day, and the lowest allotted percentage of respondent’s daily
budget breakdown is for other expenses, 15% of their allowance per day.

TABLE 9. Daily Budget Breakdown of Allowance of College Students

Categories Allotted Percentage

Savings 20%

Meals 40%

Transportation 25%

Other Expenses 15%

The Table 9, shows the daily budget breakdown of allowance of the 50
respondents of the college students. It shows that the highest allotted percentage
of respondent’s daily budget breakdown is for meals, 40% of their allowance per
day, and the lowest allotted percentage of respondent’s daily budget breakdown
is for other expenses, 15% of their allowance per day.

TABLE 10. Daily Budget Breakdown of Allowance of Employees

Categories Allotted Percentage

Savings 20%

Meals 25%

Transportation 25%

Other Expenses 10%

House Obligation 20%

210 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

The Table 10, shows the daily budget breakdown of allowance of the 50
respondents of the employee. It shows that the highest allotted percentage of
respondent’s daily budget breakdown is for meals and transportation, 25% of their
allowance per day, and the lowest allotted percentage of respondent’s daily
budget breakdown is for other expenses, 10% of their allowance per day.

TABLE 11. Willingness to Download the Application

Users Yes No

Senior High School 30 20

College Students 34 16

Employees 40 10

Families 32 18
The Table 11, shows the willingness of the target users to download the
application. It shows that the highest numbers of respondents answered yes in
downloading the application.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

Conclusion
The proponents were able to meet the requirements needed in order to develop
the application and to also satisfy the needs of the future users. The proponents
were also able to upload the application in Google Play Store. Based on the
conducted evaluation with the target users, the proponents conclude that they
have reached the satisfaction that the users are looking for, they also succeeded
in creating a budgeting application for students in senior high school and college,
employees, and for the families.

The proponents were able to apply the details that they gathered from surveys
and interviews to the application so that it will be appropriate for using. The
application was successfully made with the use of original images, design, colors,
and sounds. iPon will not only provide an educative way of budgeting, but also it
will provide the user the entertaining way of budgeting with the user of their
mobile phones.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 211

 Therefore, the proponents conclude that iPon can be an educational and
entertainment application for the users, but there will still be more test and
finalization that is needed for the stability and reliability of the application.

Suggestion

iPon can a be great recommendation for future researchers and developers that
has a related objectives. However, the proponents and the future researchers
should consider the use of other software that can be more useful and applicable
to use, where it will be easier and not complicated to use. This software should
still be related for android development and might also help them along the way.
These recommendations can help with creating and improving an application with
more functions and features.

Future researchers can develop an application that can perform the limitation
of iPon and can also satisfy different range of users. As for iPon, the proponents
are only targeting users such as students from senior high school to college, single
employees that has not yet invest to anything, and a young and growing family
with a total of four members only.

REFERENCE

What is Photoshop. (n.d.). Retrieved from

https://itconnect.uw.edu/learn/workshops/ online-tutorials/graphics-
and-design-workshops/adobe-cs/photoshop/.

Mobileapplicationdevelopment.(n.d.).Retrievedfromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w
iki/ Mobile_application_development.

AConceptualFrameworkforMobileLearning.(n.d.).Retrievedfromhttps://ideas.re
pec. org/p/amr/wpaper/464.html.

Conceptual.Framework.for.Mobile-Based.Application.(n.d.).Retrievedfrom
www. irmainternational.org/viewtitle/31165/.

AdobeFlashProfessional CS6. (n.d.). Retrieved from

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/ flash/articles/create-first-flash-
document.html.

Fearn, N. (2016, January 28). The 11 Best UK Apps for Money Management and
Personal Finance. Retrieved from

212 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 http://www.lifehacker.co.uk/2016/01/28/ the-11-best-money-
management-budgeting-and-personal-finance-apps-forandroid-and-ios.

Best budgeting apps: 7 apps to take control of your finances. (2016, January 1).
Retrieved from http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/135942-best-
budgetingapps-7-apps-to-take-control-of-your-finances.

By doing away in the ‘accounting jargon’, KashFlow has created an app for the
ordinary user. (2015, May 27). Web.AppStorm. Retrieved from
http://web.appstorm. net/roundups/finances-roundups/12-fantastic-
finance-tracking-managementapps/.

Money Management Skills for Youth. (n.d.). Retrieved September 27, 2016, from
https://www.moneymanagement.org/Financial-
Education/MoneyManagement-For-Kids.aspx.

Foz, D. (2016, January 11). Denise Foz. Retrieved from

http://blog.pawnhero.ph/15online-tools-you-can-use-to-monitor-your-
budget/.

The Philippine Online Chronicles. (2014, June 13). Retrieved September from
http:// thepoc.net/index.php/author/rachel-yapchiongco/.

News, A. (2014, January 12). Want to manage your finances better? Here are some
apps. Retrieved from http://news.abs-
cbn.com/business/01/13/14/wantmanage-your-finances-better-here-are-
some-apps.

5 Free Apps That Keep Your Budget In Line | MoneyMax.ph. (2015, May 08).
Retrieved November 02, 2016, from http://www.moneymax.ph/blog/5-
free-apps-thatkeep-your-budget-in-line/.

‘LAWANG SEWU AKUNTANSI’: ACCOUNTING-BASED

DIGITAL LEARNING IN ENHANCING TEACHER AND
STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
Sandy Arief Jariyah

ABSTRACT
Most accounting teachers find challenges in distributing their
knowledge to their students. They face difficulties to make their

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 213

 students come to an understanding about the given lesson. However,
traditional method of teaching fails to deliver what teachers taught.
It seems to be ‘out-of-date’ yet boring ways to educate students.
Students demand fun and enjoyable learning activity as their lifestyle
led them to this habit. In one hand, there is a very impressive take-
up of technology which drives us to the digital era. Thus, it may be
helpful to engage sophisticated technology and fun learning in the
classroom. It is ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ http://
lawangsewuakuntansi.simplesite.com/, a fresh idea to learn basic
accounting by digital learning. The idea dragged from Lawang Sewu,
a cultural heritage of Semarang. The application of this digital
learning media is expected to develop innovative and imaginative
learning environment, stimulate eager to learn, and enhance
students understanding about accounting. ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’
also helps students to learn theoretically and conceptually about
basic accounting. This knowledge eases them to receive advanced
material. Moreover, teachers can easily evaluate how far the lesson
perceived by their students. However, this concept requires
integrated cooperation of teachers and students. Teachers have to
play their role as player, facilitator, motivator, and evaluator.
Moreover, students need to put their interest and attention toward
‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’. In conclusion, this Accounting-based digital
learning can be an effective media to deliver accounting lesson in the
classroom.

Key words: accounting, digital learning, learning media.

INTRODUCTION
Most teachers find challenges in maintain student engagement in the classroom.
Romero (2012) argued that learner’s engagement in learning activities results
from the combination of the learner’s willingness to participate in the learning
activities and the efforts the learner engages during the efficient time-on-task.
He also stated that learner’s engagement is dynamic and contextual.
Teachercentred or commonly known as traditional teaching method fails to
optimally achieve the learning objective, yet student engagement as well. Even,
traditional teaching method has often been labelled as boring for many students

214 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

(McClarty et al, 2012). Boring student may lead them to drop out, as Bridgeland
et al (2006) finding that about 50% high schools dropout because the classes were
not interesting, and 70% of them were not motivated or inspired to work hard.
Furthermore, interactive learning is more effective than traditional teaching
(Dorestani, 2005).Thus, it is really crucial to develop innovative learning media
for enhancing teacher and student engagement. In other hand, there is a very
impressive take-up of technology which drive us to the digital era. Sophisticated
technologies immerse into every aspect of life and ultimately has significant
impact and shift on how educational system works. Currently, students are
growing-up in a media-rich world that cannot be defined without computer and
internetconnection. Today’s students come to class with smart phones, laptops
and iPods. They are not tool kit which they may before, but simply a lifestyle.
They spend most of their times by playing computer games and internet.
Consequently, teachers have better aligned their teaching style to the more upto-
date ways today’s students like to learn, which is playing digital game.

Many researchers have put interest on how promising of using digital games in
the learning activities. Hawlitschek and Joeckel (2017) found that playing
educational game improves students’ knowledge on the historical theme. They
argued that game can be considered as precondition for increasing learning
performance.

A similar result found by Diaz (2015). He found that exercise game improves
students’ performance. Similarly, Khenissi et al (2014) also found that serious
game improves student’s level of knowledge. Moreover, digital games contain
competitive activities which conform to rules, aims, feedback, interaction and
result (Ahmad and Jaafar, 2011). Apply digital games in learning activities may
be challenging. However, those findings calls the stakeholder especially teachers
and game designer to design digital game learning for learning activities. Whitton
(2010) emphasized several features attached to educational game. First, game
should align learning outcomes and the game activities itself. Second, effective
educational games involve some aspect of collaboration with others. Third, pupils
need to understand the purpose of the game. Based on these criteria, authors
and team attempt to create helpful digital game of accounting. It is ‘Lawang
Sewu Akuntansi’, a collaboration of final project of IT-Based Learning Media
course in Department of Economic Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas
Negeri Semarang. ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ aims to enhance teacher and students
engagement in the classroom. ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ elaborates learning and
games for accounting students regarding basic accounting lessons. In classroom

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 215

settings, students that does not master the basic knowledge –in this case, basic
accounting knowledge- will face more challenges to understand the advanced
material.McClarty et al (2012) described that a student cannot unlock Algebra
until a prerequisite knowledge of previous skill has been mastered. Therefore,
playing ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ may create students’ best understanding of the
given lessons which in turn may help them to succeed the course.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Model of Games and Learning

Garris et al (2002) creates model of learning in instructional games. Instructional
content and game characteristic should be possessed by the educational games.
Those features trigger a cycle, including user judgement, user behaviour, and
system feedback. Games must encourage students to re-play the game by their
self-motivation. In the end, repetition of the games increase understanding and
led the pupils to achieve the determined learning objectives.

Figure 1. Input-Process-Outcome Game Model (Garris et al, 2002)

Related Works
Ahmad and Jaafar (2011) argued that computer games provide basic interactive
cognitive models. It may create enjoyment. Students become able to gain
cognitive and affective elements through problem solving, decision making,
making conclusion and collaborative work with their peers. Moreover, games suit
all students with various grades because it does not need to acquire specific
knowledge to play. Computer games also helps pupils not only to understand the

216 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

material but also build up their personality. Game Based Learning (GBL) can
create collaborative learning and promote students engagement (Romero, 2012).
In game setting, there will be intergroup competition, intragroup cooperation,
and discussion of collaborative decision making. GBL foster students’
communication skill and teamwork. Furthermore, game designed for
collaboration process help to improve learning outcomes in intragroup GBL
setting. Diaz (2015) employed active-learning exercise to help audit students
understand about audit opinion. He stated that millennial students expect more
innovative learning activities such as collaborative learning. Immediate feedback
from others, correct misperceptions, and understand how they are thinking is
important. Moreover, the results showed that exercise game improves students’
performance. They perceived the exercise as enjoyable and contribute to their
learning experience

Tan (2015) found that playing computer games creates excitement to the students
and it is labelled as the most important value satisfied from computer games
playing. In addition, pupils also sought warm relationship with others and a sense
of accomplishment. Computer games provides an opportunity for learners to build
a community with shared and common concern and collaborate to achieve goals.
Moreover, computer games immerse learners into imaginary world and it fulfils
their need of fantasy. Mercer, et al (2017) described the advantage of using games
as an approach to deliver effective education for sustainable development.
Games allows learning by doing and learning by failing. Furthermore, there is no
negative consequence of falling. Besides, when a student fails to accomplish the
game, he will be motivated to re-play the game and it may increase his
understanding towards the lessons. Games also promote knowledge, fun,
entertainment and improve student engagement as well. Based on those
literatures, this study aims to describe the practical implication of ‘Lawang Sewu
Akuntansi’ as learning media to learn accounting. Challenges also demonstrates
and how far the program may success the learning activity.

METHODS
This study employs literature study approach to collect relevant information to
the issue of digital games application in learning activity. The data is analysed
qualitatively, there is secondary data in the form of theory, definition and
discussion from literature, journals and articles. Then, the data is synthesized to
theories and relevant expert opinion to get a conclusion about the

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 217

implementation of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ to create innovative and imaginative
learning activity.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’

‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is final project collaboration of IT-Based Learning Media
course in Department of Accounting Education, Faculty of Economics, Universitas
Negeri Semarang. The idea of ‘Lawang SewuAkuntansi’ dragged from cultural
heritage of Semarang, Central Java Province, Indonesia. Lawang Sewu literally
means thousand doors, thus Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ has thousand doors to learn
accounting. Using Lawang Sewu as the main idea, users of this games is driven to
learn accounting in a very enjoyable ways by using ‘click’ in the computer and
the users will be directed to ‘thousand doors’ just like Lawang Sewu to play the
programs.

‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is not only consist of game. In the open-access website
of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’, at http://lawangsewuakuntansi.simplesite. com/,
learners can find accounting song, accounting video, accounting puzzle and
matching pictures, etc. Learning accounting is very fun by using
LawangSewuAkuntansi. More importantly, both teachers and students can
download the games and playing it both online or offline for free.

Figure 2. Home of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ (Authors, 2017)

218 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

In ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ game, students allows to study accounting terms and
accounting cycle. Accounting terms can be learned by clicking the door of
glossary, there are definition of account, types of account, and definition of
specific account. In cycle, pupils can study accounting cycle, the definition of
each cycle, and example of each cycle. They can understand how accounting
works and see the actual example of each step. The interesting part in ‘Lawang
Sewu Akuntansi’ game is that students can easily evaluate their learning progress
by playing exercise. Students will be directed to insert their names and choose
the exercise. There are eight exercises. Each exercise group has 10 questions,
consist of theoretical exercise and practical exercise. Each question has a value
of 10. It is easy to play the exercise because student will only need to click on
the right ‘door’ –in this case, each answer option is figured as a door. In the end,
the score from the exercise is occurred. By this, the learners can see how far
they understand the lessons and they may re-play the exercise by electing the
same exercise or try other existing exercises.

Teacher may have final evaluation by using course evaluation. There are three
groups of evaluation question. For the evaluation, there are 20 questions. Each
question has 10 points. Students need to correctly answer 16 question with 160
point to pass the evaluation. However, there is time limit. Students have to
accomplish to answer all the question for 10 minutes, or half minute for a
question. If they run out of time, the remaining question is determined as
unanswered. Students allow to evaluate whether they correctly or wrongfully
answer the question because after answering a question, a pop up occurred and
told the learners if the answer is correct or wrong.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 219

 Figure 3. Evaluation (Authors, 2017)

Potential and Implication

Most researches argued that financial constraint occurred when educators
attempt to use digital learning in the learning activity (Francis, 2006; Baek, 2008;
Wastiau et al, 2009). There may be inappropriate game with learning context,
lack of hardware requirement, and technical issue (Whitton, 2010). However,
‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ can overcome the challenges. It is free, teacher only
needs internet connection to access the website and download the game. In one
hand, the content of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is aligned to learning outcomes of
basic accounting course. The program does not need complex tools to play, by
using computer, laptop, or smartphone the students and teachers can easily
operate the game.

The potential contribution of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ to student academic

success is significant. Often pupils experience boredom in the classroom from
lecturing. Thus, most students do not put their attention up on the lessons in the
classroom. Digital game cope this problem by creating innovative and imaginative
learning environment. McClarty et al (2012) supported this by stating that we

220 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

think and understand best when we can imagine a situation and that prepares us
for action. Moreover, gaming experience encourage the players to improve
through repeated practice by replaying parts of a game. Fun and enjoyable
learning of accounting with ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ stimulates students to learn
and learn. Repetition of playing games will not dragged them to boredom, besides
it challenges them and in turn help them succeed the course. According to this,
students gain many things from playing ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’, which are
knowledge, fun, excitement, entertainment and their engagement to the lesson.

In higher education, ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi can be used in a variety of ways. It

can be delivered as study resources, with or without facilitator to increase their
retention of the lessons. Pupils may play it individually or collectively. In the
classroom setting, teacher may introduce ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ to help
students understand the lessons within the course. Furthermore, playing ‘Lawang
Sewu Akuntansi’ is very easy and everyone can play the games. It is affordable
and can be freely access on the website. Thus, practical implication is promising.
Nevertheless, ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ indeed demands the teachers be able as
a player, facilitator, motivator and evaluator. As a player, teachers have to
understand how the program works. Moreover, teachers is required to deliver
instruction and direct the class as a facilitator. Motivating students is a must to
ensure that students meet the learning outcomes. In the final course, evaluation
is important to observe how far the lesson perceived by the students. Besides,
contribution from the students by giving their engagement to the game lesson
will help teachers achieve the determined learning objective.

In the end, those are the main challenge to implement ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’.
It is a learning media, which means that the learning success depends on how it
is delivered and used. This program works best if both teachers and students
collaborate in achieving the learning outcomes. However, it is teachers who
contributes most. They should possess the ability to situate the learning
environment. Teaching with digital gaming and lecturing is totally different.
Digital game learning encourages teachers to be more active, being able to
simulate the game and yet they have to maintain the whole condition of the class.
Distraction may occurs and disturb the learning activities, however it can be
overcome if the teachers perform their best to transfer knowledge within the
game.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 221

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is accounting-based learning media to enhance teachers
and students engagement. It helps students understand the lessons well, progress
their studying and remove boredom in learning activities as well. The program is
affordable and easy to play, which ease the learning activity. However, it will be
challenging for teachers because they need to be more active, being able to
simulate the game and maintain the whole condition of the class. Nevertheless,
it is very promising that the application of ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is effective
to deliver accounting lessons in the classroom. Accounting teachers may consider
to use ‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ for learning activities. It is also recommended
that game designer develops this program for advanced accounting because
‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ is limited to basic accounting course. This study uses
description approach, and thus empirical evidence on how ‘Lawang Sewu
Akuntansi’ helps in improving students’ performance has to be revealed.
Therefore, future research may explore quantitatively about the effect of
‘Lawang Sewu Akuntansi’ in accounting class.

222 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains

 REFERENCE

Ahmad, J., &Jaafar, A. (2011). Computer Games: Implementation into teaching

and learning. UKM Teaching and Learning Congress 2011.

Baek, Y. K. (2008). What hinders teachers in using computer and video games in
the classroom? Exploring factors inhibiting the uptake of computer and
video games. Cyber Psychology and Behaviour, 6, 665-671.

Bridgeland, J. M., Bilulio, J. J., & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic:
Perspectives of high school dropouts. Retrieved from http://www.
ignitelearning.com/pdf/TheSilentEpidemic3-o6FINAL.pdf.

Diaz, M. C. (2015). Assembling the opinion: An active learning exercise for audit
students. J. of Acc. Ed, retrieved from http://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.
jaccedu.2015.12.001.

Dorestani, A. (2005). 2005). Is Interactive/Active Learning Superior to Traditional

Lecturing in Economics Courses?Humanomics, 21(1), pp.1-20, retrieved
from https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018897

Francis, Russell. (2006). Towards a Theory of a Games Based Pedagogy. JISC

Innovating e-Learning 2006: Transforming Learning Experiences Online
Conference.

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., &Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation and Learning
Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal Practice and Research,
33(4).

Hawlitschek, A., Joeckel, S. (2017). Increasing the Effectiveness of Digital

Educational games: The Effect of a Learning Instruction on Students’
Learning, Motivation and Cognitive Load. Computer in Human Behavior.
Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.040.

Khenissi, M. A., Essalmi, F., &Jemni, M. (2014). Comparison between Serious

Game and Learning Version of Existing Games. Procedia- Social and
Behavioral Science 191, 487-494.

McClarty, K. L., Orr, A., Frey, P. M., Dolan, R. P., Vassileva, V., &McVay, A. (2012).
A Literature Review of Gaming in Education. Research Report of Pearson.

Learning Technologies for Specific Domains 223

Mercer, T. G., Kythreotis, A. P., Robinson, Z. P., Stolte, T., George, S. M., &
Haywood S. K. (2017). The use of educational game design and play in higher
education to influence sustainable behavior. International Journal of
Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(3), pp.359-384, retrieved
fromhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2015-0064

Romero, M. (2012). Learner Engagement in the use of Individual and Collaborative

Serious Games, in Charles Wankel, Patrick Blessinger (ed.).Increasing
Student Engagement and Retention Using Immersive Interfaces: Virtual
Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation (Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher
Education, Volume 6 Part C) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.15 - 34

Tan, W. L. (2015). Strategies for Designing Engaging E-learning Instructions: Know

your Learners’ Need, in Charles Wankel, Patrick Blessinger (ed.).Increasing
Student Engagement and Retention Using Immersive Interfaces: Virtual
Worlds, Gaming, and Simulation (Cutting-edge Technologies in Higher
Education, Volume 6 Part C) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.35 - 63

Wastiau, P., Kearney, C. & den Berghe, W., V. (2009). How are digital games used
in schools? Retrieved from http://games.eun.org/upload/gis-synthesis_
report_en.pdf.

Whitton, Nicola. (2010). Learning with Digital Games: A Practical Guide to

Engaging Students in Higher Education. New York: Routledge.

224 Learning Technologies for Specific Domains