University of Salahaddin College of Agricultural
Engineering Science
Report Title: Pacing
By: Rezheen Abdullah & Avin Omar
Course: Surveying / Theory
Stage: 1st
Supervised by: Dr. Kardo N.Kareem
Table of Contents
Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1
Importance of Pacing in Surveying ......................................................................................... 2
Accurate Measurements .................................................................................................... 2
Time and Cost Savings ........................................................................................................ 2
Enhanced Situational Awareness ........................................................................................ 2
Factors Affecting Pacing Accuracy .......................................................................................... 2
Stride Length Determination ................................................................................................. 3
Pacing Techniques and Strategies .......................................................................................... 3
Pacing Exercise and Practice .................................................................................................. 4
Pacing Error Identification and Correction.............................................................................. 4
Pacing in Different Terrain and Conditions ............................................................................. 5
Uneven Terrain .................................................................................................................. 5
Soft or Unstable ................................................................................................................. 5
Dense Vegetation............................................................................................................... 5
Inclement Weather ............................................................................................................ 6
Pacing Recordkeeping and Documentation ............................................................................ 6
Conclusion and Best Practices ................................................................................................ 7
References ............................................................................................................................ 8
Introduction
Measuring distance and angles with simple instruments are two of the most common surveying
procedures used in agriculture. Even though the instruments may be simple, a sufficient level of
accuracy for many measuring jobs can be achieved with practice and careful work. Several
methods and devices can be used for measuring distance. The principal ones are:
1. Pacing
2. Odometer
3. Taping or “chaining”
4. Stadia
5. Optical range finder
6. Electronic distance measuring (EDM)
One of the decisions that must be made when preparing to measure a distance is selecting the
method or device to use.
Pacing is the simplest and easiest method for measuring distance. Pacing is the process of walking
the distance and counting the number of steps “paces” to cover the distance. The distance is
determined by multiplying the number of steps taken between two points by one’s pace factor.
A person’s pace factor is determined by pacing (walking) a measured distance, usually 300 to 500
ft., several times and determining the average length of pace (step). With practice it is possible
to pace a distance with an error of less than 2 ft per 100 ft. To achieve that level of precision a
person must learn to adopt a pacing step that is different from their normal walking step because
many factors can cause variations in the length of a person’s pace. Three of these are the
roughness of the surface, the slope of the ground, and the type of vegetation. Care must be taken
to ensure that a consistent pace factor is used. One advantage of pacing for measuring distance
is that it doesn’t require any specialized equipment. The biggest disadvantage is that it requires
being able to walk the route. It is not very useful for measuring distance in rough terrain, across
swamps or any other terrain where an individual could not walk the distance or walk in a straight
line. Pacing is a fundamental surveying technique that relies on the ability to accurately estimate
distances by walking. It is a simple yet crucial skill for land surveyors, as it allows them too quickly
and efficiently measure distances without the need for specialized equipment. By understanding
the principles of pacing and practicing this technique, surveyors can gather valuable data in the
field, laying the groundwork for accurate maps, site plans, and construction projects.
1|Page
Importance of Pacing in Surveying
Accurate Measurements
Pacing is a fundamental skill in surveying that allows surveyors to quickly and accurately measure
distances without relying on bulky equipment. By developing a consistent and reliable pace,
surveyors can obtain precise measurements that are critical for mapping, land division,
construction planning, and a wide range of other surveying applications. Accurate pacing is
especially important in areas where traditional measurement tools are impractical or difficult to
use, such as rugged terrain or densely forested environments.
Time and Cost Savings
Pacing is an efficient and cost-effective alternative to using distance measurement tools like tape
measures or laser rangefinders. Pacing allows surveyors to cover large areas quickly, reducing
the time and resources required to complete a survey project. This can result in significant cost
savings for clients, making pacing an essential skill for surveyors who need to work within tight
budgets and tight timelines.
Enhanced Situational Awareness
Pacing also helps surveyors maintain a heightened sense of situational awareness while in the
field. By continuously monitoring their pace and stride length, surveyors can better navigate
through various terrain and obstacles, while also being more attuned to their surroundings. This
improved spatial awareness can enhance safety, allow for quicker decision-making, and help
surveyors identify potential hazards or features that may have been overlooked with other
measurement methods.
Factors Affecting Pacing Accuracy
Pacing accuracy in surveying is influenced by a variety of factors that can impact the reliability
and consistency of measurements. Understanding these factors is crucial for obtaining precise
and reliable survey data.
1. Individual Factors: An individual's physical characteristics, such as leg length, stride
patterns, and walking pace, can significantly affect pacing accuracy. Factors like age,
fitness level, and fatigue can also contribute to variations in pacing.
2. Terrain Conditions: The type of terrain being surveyed can have a significant impact on
pacing accuracy. Uneven ground, steep slopes, and obstacles can cause inconsistencies in
stride length and walking speed, leading to inaccuracies in pacing measurements.
3. Environmental Conditions: Environmental factors, such as weather conditions, visibility,
and lighting, can also influence pacing accuracy. For example, heavy rain, fog, or strong
winds can make it more difficult to maintain a consistent pace and observe visual cues for
distance estimation.
2|Page
4. Equipment and Techniques: The type of equipment used, such as the surveying compass
or rangefinder, and the pacing techniques employed can impact the accuracy of pacing
measurements. Proper calibration, training, and attention to detail are essential for
minimizing equipment-related errors.
5. Cognitive Factors: Mental fatigue, distractions, or lack of focus can also contribute to
pacing inaccuracies. Maintaining concentration and adhering to proper pacing techniques
are crucial for consistent and reliable measurements.
Stride Length Determination
Determining an accurate stride length is a crucial step in pacing measurements during surveying
operations. A person's stride length, which is the distance between two consecutive footprints,
can vary significantly depending on factors such as height, leg length, and walking speed. To
ensure reliable pacing results, surveyors must take the time to carefully measure and calibrate
their individual stride lengths. One common method for determining stride length is the "walk
and count" technique. This involves walking a measured distance, such as 100 feet, and counting
the number of steps taken. By dividing the distance by the number of steps, the surveyor can
calculate their average stride length. This process should be repeated several times to account
for variations in walking speed and terrain. Additionally, surveyors may need to adjust their stride
length based on the type of terrain they are traversing, as soft or uneven ground can affect the
consistency of their steps. Another approach is to use a pacing string or tape measure to directly
measure the distance of a single stride. This method provides a more precise measurement but
requires the surveyor to pause their movement and take the reading. Some surveyors prefer to
combine both techniques, using the "walk and count" method to establish a baseline stride
length and then fine-tuning it with direct measurements as needed. Regardless of the approach
used, it is essential that surveyors regularly recalibrate their stride length, as it can change over
time due to factors such as fatigue, terrain changes, or even changes in the surveyor's physical
condition. By maintaining accurate and up-to-date stride length measurements, surveyors can
ensure the reliability and precision of their pacing-based data collection during field operations.
Pacing Techniques and Strategies
Pacing in surveying is a crucial skill that requires a combination of techniques and strategies to
achieve accurate results. One of the most fundamental techniques is the stride method, where
the surveyor establishes a consistent stride length and counts the number of steps taken to cover
a known distance. This method allows the surveyor to calibrate their pace and develop a reliable
pacing rhythm. Another effective strategy is the two-person pacing method, where one surveyor
paces while the other observes and provides feedback on the accuracy of the pacing. This
collaborative approach helps identify and correct any inconsistencies in the pacing technique,
3|Page
leading to more precise measurements. Stride method: Establishing a consistent stride length
and counting steps to cover a known distance.
1. Two-person pacing: One surveyor paces while the other observes and provides feedback
to improve accuracy.
2. Terrain-specific pacing: Adjusting pacing techniques to account for changes in terrain,
such as slopes, uneven ground, or obstacles.
3. Pacing on straight lines: Maintaining a steady pace and direction while walking in a
straight line to ensure accurate measurements.
4. Pacing around obstacles: Developing strategies to navigate around obstacles, such as
trees, buildings, or other obstructions, without compromising pacing accuracy.
5. Effective pacing in surveying also requires the surveyor to be mindful of their body and
the surrounding environment. This includes maintaining proper posture, being aware of
their stride length, and adjusting their pace to account for changes in terrain or
environmental conditions. Regular practice and field exercises are essential for
developing and refining these pacing techniques and strategies, ensuring that surveyors
can consistently deliver accurate measurements in a wide range of surveying scenarios.
Pacing Exercise and Practice
Developing proficient pacing skills is essential for accurate surveying work. To hone these skills,
regular pacing exercises and practice are crucial. Surveyors should start by measuring and
recording their natural stride length on different terrain, then practice pacing over measured
distances to calibrate their steps. Pacing exercises can be conducted both in the field and in
controlled indoor environments. In the field, surveyors can practice pacing along marked routes,
comparing their results to known distances. Indoors, pacing can be practiced by walking along
lines or grids on the floor, with the surveyor counting their steps and comparing to the actual
distance. Consistent practice, combined with feedback and self-assessment, helps surveyors
develop a keen sense of their pacing accuracy and the ability to adjust their stride length as
needed. Challenging terrain, varied conditions, and distractions should be introduced to simulate
real-world surveying scenarios and further refine pacing skills.
Pacing Error Identification and Correction
Identifying and correcting pacing errors is a crucial step in ensuring the accuracy of surveying
measurements. Pacing errors can arise from a variety of factors, such as uneven terrain,
distractions, fatigue, or simply a lack of practice. To minimize these errors, surveyors must
develop a keen eye for detecting discrepancies and implement effective strategies to maintain
consistent pacing. One of the primary methods for identifying pacing errors is through regular
calibration and comparison against known measurements. Surveyors should frequently measure
known distances, such as marked course lines or predetermined reference points, to validate
4|Page
their pacing accuracy. Any significant deviations from the expected values should be noted and
investigated further.
1. Recognize common pacing error indicators: Inconsistent stride length, irregular rhythm,
drifting off-course, and difficulty maintaining a steady pace are all signs that pacing errors
may be present.
2. Implement corrective measures: If errors are detected, surveyors should adjust their
technique, such as focusing on maintaining a consistent stride, being mindful of terrain
changes, and practicing pacing in different environments.
3. Document and analyze pacing data: Keeping detailed records of pacing measurements
and any identified errors can help identify patterns and trends, enabling surveyors to fine-
tune their techniques and develop more effective pacing strategies.
4. Seek feedback and training: Collaborating with experienced surveyors or participating in
specialized training can provide valuable insights and strategies for improving pacing
accuracy.
By proactively identifying and addressing pacing errors, surveyors can enhance the overall quality
and reliability of their field measurements, ensuring that the data they collect is precise,
consistent, and trustworthy.
Pacing in Different Terrain and Conditions
Uneven Terrain
Pacing accuracy can be significantly impacted when traversing uneven terrain, such as hills,
valleys, or rocky surfaces. Your stride length may vary as you navigate changes in elevation and
ground texture. It's important to be mindful of these changes and adjust your pacing technique
accordingly to maintain consistent and accurate measurements.
Soft or Unstable
Ground Walking on soft or unstable ground, like mud, sand, or snow, can also affect your pacing.
Your feet may sink in or slip, causing your stride to be irregular and inconsistent. Adjusting your
technique to take shorter, more controlled steps can help you maintain better pacing accuracy
in these conditions.
Dense Vegetation
Navigating through dense vegetation, such as thick bushes or tall grass, can be a challenge for
pacing. Your stride may be impeded, and your pace may slow down as you carefully pick your
way through the foliage. Staying vigilant and adjusting your pace accordingly is crucial for
maintaining reliable measurements in these environments.
5|Page
Inclement Weather
Weather conditions like rain, wind, or snow can also impact your pacing accuracy. Slippery
surfaces, reduced visibility, and the physical exertion required to move through inclement
weather can all affect your stride and pace. Adapting your technique, such as taking shorter steps
or walking more cautiously, can help you maintain pacing consistency in these challenging
conditions.
Pacing Recordkeeping and Documentation
Accurate pacing and distance measurement are crucial in surveying, and meticulous
recordkeeping is essential to ensure the integrity and reliability of survey data. Surveyors must
meticulously document their pacing efforts, including stride lengths, number of paces, and any
adjustments or corrections made during the process. This detailed documentation serves as a
valuable reference for future surveys, allows for the verification of measurements, and provides
a comprehensive record of the surveyor's work. Pacing records should be neatly organized and
maintained, either in a physical field notebook or through digital documentation methods.
Entries should include the date, location, weather conditions, and any other relevant information
that may have affected the pacing process. Surveyors should also document their initial stride
length determinations, as well as any changes or modifications made throughout the survey. This
information can help identify patterns, trends, and potential sources of error, ultimately
improving the accuracy and consistency of future pacing efforts. In addition to detailed pacing
records, surveyors should also carefully document any supplementary measurements, such as
distances obtained through electronic or optical instruments, to cross-reference and validate
their pacing results. This comprehensive documentation not only serves as a valuable resource
for the surveyor but also ensures the transparency and accountability of the survey process,
which is essential for the acceptance and use of the final survey data by clients, regulatory
authorities, and other stakeholders.
6|Page
Conclusion and Best Practices
Embrace Continuous Improvement Pacing is an essential skill in surveying that requires
ongoing practice and refinement. Surveyors should embrace a mindset of continuous
improvement, regularly evaluating their pacing accuracy and striving to enhance their
techniques. This will ensure that pacing remains an accurate and reliable tool in their
surveying toolkit, even as conditions and terrain change.
Maintain Detailed Records Meticulous recordkeeping is crucial for pacing in surveying.
Surveyors should document their stride lengths, pacing counts, and any adjustments
made based on terrain and environmental factors. This detailed documentation not only
helps identify and correct pacing errors but also serves as a valuable reference for future
projects, ensuring consistency and accuracy over time.
Adapt to Changing Conditions Effective pacing in surveying requires the ability to adapt
to changing terrain, weather, and other environmental factors. Surveyors should be
prepared to adjust their stride length, pacing techniques, and strategies as needed to
maintain accurate measurements. By staying vigilant and responsive to these dynamic
conditions, they can ensure the reliability of their pacing data across a wide range of
surveying scenarios.
Collaborate and Seek Feedback Sharing knowledge and seeking feedback from
experienced surveyors can greatly enhance one's pacing skills. Surveyors should actively
participate in training sessions, workshops, and peer-to-peer discussions to learn from
the expertise of others. This collaborative approach not only helps identify areas for
improvement but also fosters a culture of continuous learning and knowledge-sharing
within the surveying community.
7|Page
References
1. K. And Wetherelt, A., 1999. Large scale mine visualisation using VRML. IEEE Computer
Graphics and Applications, 19(2): 39-44.
2. Kniest, E., 1997. Visualisation of theodolite errors. Proceedings, First Trans-Tasman
Surveyors Congress, Newcastle, Australia, 18.1-18.5.
3. Moore K., 1997. Interactive virtual environments for fieldwork. British Cartographic
Society Annual Symposium, Leicester University, England. See
http://www.geog.le.ac.uk/mek/VirtEnv.htmRuss, Shortis, M. R. and Seager, J. W., 1994.
The use of geographic and map coordinate systems for geodetic network adjustments.
Survey Review, 32(254): 495-511.
4. Trinder, J. C. and Han, S., 1999. Impact of new technologies on geomatics in 2010. The
Australian Surveyor, 44(1):29-34.
5. Williamson, I. P. and Ogleby C. L. 1999. Geomatics Engineering - A traditional discipline
transformed in an information technology era. AEESEAP '99 Midterm Conference
Bangkok, Thailand, May 12- 14.See
http://www.geom.unimelb.edu.au/research/publications/IPW/AEESEAP99paper1.html
6. Harry Field, John Solie - Introduction to Agricultural Engineering Technology_ A Problem
Solving Approach-Springer (2007)
8|Page
