Corrosion Inhibition in Mild Steel
Corrosion Inhibition in Mild Steel
com
Abstract
   The corrosion inhibition of mild steel in 1 M H2 SO4 using polyacrylamide (PA) in the presence of iodide ions was studied at 30–60 ◦ C using
weight loss and hydrogen evolution methods. Results obtained showed that inhibition efficiency increased with increase in concentration of PA
and decreased with increase in temperature. The inhibition efficiency of PA synergistically increased on addition of KI. The adsorption of PA alone
and in combination with iodide ions on the metal surface is found to obey Freundlich, Temkin and Flory–Huggins adsorption isotherms at all
                                                                                                        ◦
temperatures studied. Phenomenon of physical adsorption is proposed from the values of Ea and Gads obtained. Synergism parameter evaluated
is found to be greater than unity for all concentrations of PA indicating that the enhanced inhibition efficiency of PA caused by addition of iodide
ion is only due to synergism. Adsorption of PA and (PA + KI) on to mild steel surface is spontaneous.
© 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Polyacrylamide; Synergistic effect; Iodide ions; Adsorption isotherms; Mild steel; Corrosion
 ∗   Corresponding author.                                                           The mild steel of the following composition (wt.%), C (0.19), Si (0.26),
     E-mail address: saviourumoren@yahoo.com (S.A. Umoren).                        Mn (0.64), S (0.05), P (0.06), Ni (0.09), Cr (0.08), Mo (0.02), Cu (0.27),
0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.06.018
388                                        S.A. Umoren, E.E. Ebenso / Materials Chemistry and Physics 106 (2007) 387–393
and the remainder iron (Fe) was used in the study. The metal was prepared               obtained from Eq. (2):
as previously reported [3–5]. The corrodent concentration used was 1 M                                                       
H2 SO4 (BDH Chemical Supplies Laboratory, England). Polyacrylamide (PA)                                                  Wi
                                                                                        surface coverage, θ =         1−                                        (3)
(Hi-tek Polymers, Japan) [Mn = 50,000 g mol−1 ] was used as inhibitor in the                                             W0
concentration range of 2 × 10−5 to 1 × 10−4 M. The halide salt, potassium
iodide (KI, BDH) used was in the concentration range 0.02–0.10 M. However,                  Results shown in the table revealed that corrosion rates
0.06 M KI was used for the synergistic study.                                           increase with increase in temperature for all the systems stud-
    The apparatus and procedure followed for weight loss and hydrogen evolu-            ied. The highest corrosion rate (11.0 × 10−3 mpy) was obtained
tion methods were similar to that earlier reported [3–5,23]. In the weight loss
                                                                                        at 60 ◦ C. In the presence of PA and 0.06 M KI, the corro-
method, the progress of the corrosion reaction was monitored by determining
the weight loss of the coupons (obtained as the differences in the weight of the        sion rate was observed to reduce significantly indicating that
coupons after immersion in different solutions of the system and the original           PA actually inhibited the corrosion of mild steel in the acidic
weight of the coupons) and careful measurement of the volume of hydrogen gas            environment. Further reduction in corrosion rate was observed
evolved for weight loss and hydrogen evolution methods, respectively, at fixed          on addition of 0.06 M KI to PA. The reduction in corrosion
time intervals. In both techniques, the experiments were conducted at 30–60 ◦ C
                                                                                        rate of PA when combined with iodide ions was found to be
in a thermostated bath.
                                                                                        concentration dependent. Fig. 1 shows the plot of inhibition effi-
                                                                                        ciency against concentration for (a) PA and (b) KI at different
3. Results and discussion                                                               temperatures. Inspection of the figures revealed that inhibition
                                                                                        efficiency increase with increase in concentration of the inhibitor
3.1. Weight loss measurements                                                           and decrease with increase in temperature. Decrease in inhibi-
                                                                                        tion efficiency with increase in temperature may be attributed
    The corrosion of mild steel in 1 M H2 SO4 in the absence                            to increase in the solubility of the protective films and of any
and presence of KI, PA and PA–KI mixtures was investigated                              reaction products precipitated on the surface of the metal that
at temperature range of 30–60 ◦ C using weight loss measure-                            may otherwise inhibit the reaction rate. From Table 1, it is
ments. The calculated values of corrosion rate (mpy), inhibition                        clearly seen that inhibition efficiency synergistically increase
efficiency (%I) and surface coverage (θ) for mild steel corrosion                       on addition of 0.06 M KI to PA at all the temperatures stud-
in 1 M H2 SO4 (blank) and in the presence of inhibitor (PA),                            ied with the highest inhibition efficiency (69.0%) obtained for
0.06 M KI and 0.06 M KI in combination with different concen-                           0.06 M KI–10 × 10−5 M PA mixture at 30 ◦ C. Results obtained
trations of PA at 30–60 ◦ C from the weight loss measurement                            in this present study are in agreement with what has been earlier
are shown in Table 1. The corrosion rate, inhibition effi-                              reported by other authors [13–18]. One possible mechanism of
ciency and surface coverage were evaluated using the following                          inhibition action of inhibitors is the adsorption of the inhibitor
equations:                                                                              onto the metal surface which blocks the metal surface and this
                                                                                        do not permit the corrosion process to take place. The adsorp-
                               534W
corrosion rate (mpy) =                                                         (1)      tion process is made possible due to the presence of heteroatoms
                                ρAt                                                     such as oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur atoms, which are regarded
where W is the weight loss (g), ρ the density of the mild steel                         as centres of adsorption.
coupon (g cm−3 ), A the area of the coupon (cm2 ) and t is the                              Polyacrylamide contains nitrogen and oxygen atoms in its
exposure time (h).                                                                      structure having lone pair and -electrons. The compound could
                                                                                        be adsorbed by the interaction between the lone pair of the elec-
                                     
                                   Wi                                                   trons of the oxygen and nitrogen atoms, respectively, on the PA
Inhibition efficiency I(%) = 1 −        100                 (2)                         moiety and mild steel surface. This process may be facilitated
                                   W0
                                                                                        by the presence of d-vacant orbital of iron making the steel,
where W0 and Wi are the weight losses of mild steel in inhibited                        as observed in d-group metals or transition metals. In addition
and uninhibited solution. The degree of surface coverage (θ) was                        to molecular form, PA can be present in protonated species in
Table 1
Calculated values of corrosion rate (mpy), inhibition efficiency (%I) and degree of surface coverage for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4 for different systems at
30–60 ◦ C from weight loss measurements
Systems/concentration               Corrosion rate (mpy) × 10−3 , inhibition efficiency (%I) and degree of surface coverage (θ)
30 ◦ C 40 ◦ C 50 ◦ C 60 ◦ C
Fig. 1. Plot of inhibition efficiency against concentration for mild steel corrosion         The results obtained are presented in Table 2. The data
in 1 M H2 SO4 in the presence of (a) PA and (b) KI at different temperatures.             presented follows the same trend as observed for weight loss
                                                                                          technique. Inhibition efficiency decreased with rise in temper-
                                                                                          ature and increased with increasing concentration of PA in
an acidic solution. The formation of positively charged proto-                            combination with 0.06 M KI.
nated species facilitates adsorption of the compound on the metal                            In comparison with the weight loss measurements, the values
surface through electrostatic interaction between the organic                             of inhibition efficiency and surface coverage obtained from the
molecules and the metal surface [24,25]. Previous reports [1–16]                          hydrogen evolution method are lower. This can be attributed to
have shown that the inhibiting effect of halide ions in com-                              the difference in time required to form an adsorbed layer of the
bination with organic compounds in acidic medium increases                                inhibitor on the metal surface that can inhibit corrosion. More so,
in the order I− > Br− > Cl− which seems to indicate that the                              the weight loss method gives average corrosion rates whereas the
radii (which increases in the order Cl− < Br− < I− ) and the                              hydrogen evolution technique gives more or less instantaneous
electronegativity (which increases in the order Cl− > Br− > I− )                          corrosion rates.
Table 2
Calculated values of corrosion rate (cm s−1 ), inhibition efficiency (%I) and degree of surface coverage for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4 for different systems
at 30–60 ◦ C from hydrogen evolution measurements
Systems/concentration               Corrosion rate (ml s−1 ) × 10−3 , inhibition efficiency (%I) and degree of surface coverage (θ)
30 ◦ C 40 ◦ C 50 ◦ C 60 ◦ C
                                                                              Fig. 3. Temkin adsorption isotherm plot for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4
Fig. 2. Freundlich adsorption isotherm plot for mild steel corrosion in 1 M
                                                                              in the presence of KI (inset), PA and PA + KI at 30 ◦ C.
H2 SO4 in the presence of KI (inset), PA and PA + KI at 30 ◦ C.
                                                                              given by [14,26]:
3.3. Adsorption considerations                                                     
                                                                                    θ
                                                                              log       = log K + x log(1 − θ)                                          (7)
    The trend in inhibition efficiency with temperature for PA                     C
alone and in combination with KI on the surface of mild
                                                                              where θ is the degree of surface coverage, C the concentration
steel may be postulated that PA inhibits the corrosion of mild
                                                                              of the systems studied, x the number of water molecule replaced
steel by physisorption mechanism (i.e. inhibition efficiency
                                                                              by one inhibitor molecule and K is the equilibrium constant
decreases with increase in temperature). The veracity of the
                                                                              for the adsorption process. The adsorption of an organic
above statement was ascertained by evaluating the degree of
                                                                              adsorbate at a metal/solution interface can be represented as a
surface coverage (θ) of the adsorbed PA from the weight loss
                                                                              substitution adsorption process between the organic molecules
measurement using Eq. (3). The values obtained for different
                                                                              in the aqueous solution Org(sol) and the water molecule on the
concentrations of the systems studied at 30–60 ◦ C were applied
                                                                              metallic surface H2 O(ads) [27,28]:
to determine the best isotherm for adsorption process. Fig. 2
shows the plot of log %I against log C for mild steel corrosion               Org(sol) + xH2 O(ads) = Org(ads) + xH2 O
in 1 M H2 SO4 in the presence of PA and PA + KI at 30 ◦ C.
Inset of the figure shows the plot of log %I versus log C for                 where Org(sol) and H2 O(sol) are the organic molecules and water
KI at 30 ◦ C. Linear plots were obtained which indicates that                 molecules in the aqueous solution, respectively. x is the size
Freundlich adsorption isotherm was obeyed. Similar plots were                 ratio representing the number of water molecules replaced by
obtained at 40–60 ◦ C.                                                        one molecule of organic adsorbate. The calculated values of x
    Fig. 3 shows the plot of surface coverage (θ) against loga-               and equilibrium constant of adsorption process K obtained from
rithm of inhibitor concentration for mild steel in 1 M H2 SO4                 Flory–Huggins isotherm are presented in Table 3. The values of
containing KI, PA and PA + KI at 30 ◦ C. Similar plots were                   x are less than unity showing that each molecule of the inhibitor
obtained at other temperatures (40–60 ◦ C) studied. Straight lines            occupied less than one active site on the mild steel surface [14].
were obtained indicating that the adsorption of the additives onto            The calculated values of molecular interaction parameters ‘a’
mild steel surface can be approximated using Temkin adsorption                and the equilibrium constant of adsorption process K deduced
isotherm given as                                                             from Temkin adsorption isotherm plot (Fig. 3) are also shown
                                                                              in the same table. It is seen that the values of ‘a’ are negative
exp(−2aθ) = KC                                                         (6)    in all cases showing that repulsion exists in the adsorption layer
                                                                              [29]. It is a known fact that K denotes the strength between
where ‘a’ is molecular interaction parameter, θ the degree of sur-            adsorbate and adsorbent. Large values of K imply more efficient
face coverage, K the equilibrium constant of adsorption process               adsorption and hence better inhibition efficiency [30]. K val-
and C is the concentration of the inhibitors.                                 ues was found to be in the order (PA + KI) > KI > PA at all the
    Flory–Huggins adsorption isotherm was also tested for its fit             temperatures studied with the most significant value obtained
to the experimental data obtained from the weight loss measure-               at 30 ◦ C. The values of the equilibrium constant for the adsorp-
ment. The plot of log(θ/C) against log(1 − θ) is shown in Fig. 4              tion process K obtained from both Temkin and Flory–Huggins
for (a) PA, (b) PA + KI and (c) KI at 30 ◦ C. Linear plots were               adsorption isotherms decreases with temperature suggesting that
obtained and this clearly shows that Flory–Huggins adsorption                 the inhibitor is physically adsorbed on the metal surface and des-
isotherm is obeyed. The characteristic of Flory–Huggins is                    orption processes are enhanced by increase in temperature [14].
                                             S.A. Umoren, E.E. Ebenso / Materials Chemistry and Physics 106 (2007) 387–393                                               391
                                                                                             Fig. 5. Arrhenius plot for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4 in the absence and
                                                                                             presence of KI, PA and PA + KI.
                                                                                                                        Ea
                                                                                             log CR = log A −                                                            (8)
                                                                                                                     2.303RT
                                                                                             where ‘CR’ is the corrosion rate determined from the weight loss
                                                                                             measurement, Ea the apparent activation energy, A the Arrhenius
                                                                                             constant, R the molar gas constant and T is the absolute temper-
                                                                                             ature. The apparent activation energy was determined from the
                                                                                             slopes of log(CR) versus 1/T graph depicted in Fig. 5. Ea val-
                                                                                             ues obtained for the blank, KI, PA and PA + KI are presented in
                                                                                             Table 4. It is seen that Ea values were higher in the presence of
                                                                                             the additives compared to the blank. The higher value of Ea in
                                                                                             the presence of the additives compared to that in their absence
                                                                                             and the decrease in the %I with rise in temperature is interpreted
                                                                                             as an indication of physiosorption [32–34].
                                                                                                                                    ◦
Fig. 4. Plot of log(θ/C) against log(1 − θ) for mild steel corrosion in the presence            Free energy of adsorption, Gads values were obtained
of (a) PA, (b) PA + KI and (c) KI at 30 ◦ C (Flory–Huggins adsorption isotherm).             from the intercept of Fig. 2 and calculated using the following
Table 3
Some parameters of the linear regression from Temkin and Flory–Huggins adsorption isotherm
Inhibitor              Temperature (◦ C)                                                 Temkin isotherm                              Flory–Huggins isotherm
                                                           ◦
                                                       Gads (kJ mol−1 )                 a                    K                       x                     K
Table 4                                                                           Table 5
Activation energy for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4 in the absence and       Enthalpy and entropy of adsorption for mild steel corrosion in 1 M H2 SO4 in
presence of PA, KI and (PA + KI)                                                  the absence and presence of PA, KI and (PA + KI)
                                                                                                             ◦                                   ◦
Systems/concentrations                              Activation energy,            Systems                Hads (kJ mol−1 )                Sads (kJ mol−1 K−1 )
                                                    Ea (kJ mol−1 )
                                                                                  KI                    −20.09                           −0.23
Blank                                               0.68                          PA                    −19.57                           −0.43
0.06 M KI                                           1.74                          PA + KI               −20.30                           −0.31
PA (inhibitor)                                      1.91
2 × 10−5 M PA + 0.06 M KI                           1.76
4 × 10−5 M PA + 0.06 M KI                           1.76                                                                     ◦
6 × 10−5 M PA + 0.06 M KI                           1.82
                                                                                  The figure also revealed that Gads decreases with increase in
8 × 10−5 M PA + 0.06 M KI                           1.83                          temperature which seems to indicate that adsorption of inhibitors
10 × 10−5 M PA + 0.06 M KI                          2.64                          was unfavourable at higher temperatures thus resulting in the
                                                                                  desorption of adsorbed inhibitor from the mild steel surface
                                                                                  with increase in temperature. From the figure, the values of
equation [35]:                                                                    enthalpy and entropy of adsorption were obtained for KI, PA
                  
                θ                                                                 and (PA + KI) and are presented in Table 5. The values of the
log C = log          − log B                                              (9)     thermodynamic parameters are negative. The negative sign indi-
               1−θ
                                                                                  cates that the adsorption process is spontaneous, exothermic and
                                     ◦
where log B = −1.74 − (Gads /2.303RT ) and C is the                              increases the system order [3,37].
concentration of the system studied. The calculated values of
    ◦
Gads at all the temperatures studied (30–60 ◦ C) are presented                   3.5. Synergism consideration
in Table 4. The negative values obtained suggest that the
inhibitors molecules are strongly adsorbed on the mild steel                         The synergism parameter, S1 , was evaluated using the
surface. The values also indicate a spontaneous adsorption of                     relationship given by Aramaki and Hackerman and reported
the inhibitor molecules and usually characterize their strong                     elsewhere [2,4,11,14]:
                                                         ◦
interaction with the metal surface. The value of Gads of
                                                                                         1 − I1+2
−40 kJ mol−1 is usually accepted as a threshold value between                     S1 =                                                                    (11)
                                                             ◦                                
                                                                                         1 − I1+2
chemisorption and physiosorption [36]. The values of Gads
obtained in this study is below −40 kJ mol−1 (between −17.01                      where I1+2 = I1 + I2 ; I1 = inhibition efficiency of the iodide ions;
and −21.45 kJ mol−1 ). This is consistent with electrostatic                      I2 = inhibition efficiency of the PA and I = measured inhibition
interactions between the charged molecules and the charged                        efficiency for PA in combination with iodide ions. This parame-
metal, which are indicative of physical adsorption.                               ter was evaluated from the inhibition efficiency values obtained
   From the basic thermodynamic Eq. (10), the entropy of                          from both the weight loss and hydrogen evolution measurements
adsorption could be obtained:                                                     using Eqs. (2) and (4), respectively. The results obtained are
      ◦          ◦           ◦
Gads = Hads − TSads                                                   (10)     presented in Table 6. The S1 values for both methods employed
                                     ◦
                                                                                  as shown in Table 5 for different concentrations of PA are
   Fig. 6 shows the plot of Gads against absolute temperature,                   greater than unity. This indicates that the improved inhibition
                                                      ◦
T. The figure clearly shows a good dependence of Gads on T.                      efficiency caused by the addition of iodide ions to PA is only due
                                                                                  to synergistic effect. Similar results have been reported [17,18].
                                                                                  Strong chemisorption of iodide ions on the metal surface are
                                                                                  responsible the synergistic effect of iodide ions in combination
                                                                                  with the cation of the inhibitor (PA). The cation is then adsorbed
                                                                                  by columbic attraction on the metal surface where iodide ions
                                                                                  are already adsorbed by chemisorption. Stabilization of the
                                                                                  adsorbed iodide ions with cations leads to a greater surface
                                                                                  coverage and therefore greater inhibition. It could therefore
                                                                                  Table 6
                                                                                  Synergism parameter (S1 ) for different concentrations of PA
                                                                                   2                                     1.53               1.69
                                                                                   4                                     1.54               1.58
                                                                                   6                                     1.75               1.66
                                                                                   8                                     1.76               1.68
Fig. 6. Plot of free energy of adsorption against temperature for KI, PA and      10                                     1.76               1.62
PA + KI.
                                       S.A. Umoren, E.E. Ebenso / Materials Chemistry and Physics 106 (2007) 387–393                                      393
be concluded that the addition of iodide ions enhances the                     [9]   E.E. Ebenso, Bull. Electrochem. 19 (5) (2003) 209.
inhibition efficiency to a considerable extent due to the increase            [10]   E.E. Ebenso, Bull. Electrochem. 20 (12) (2004) 551.
of the surface coverage in the presence of iodide ions.                       [11]   E.E. Ebenso, Mater. Chem. Phys. 79 (2003) 58.
                                                                              [12]   S.T. Keera, Anti-corros. Meth. Mater. 50 (4) (2003) 280.
                                                                              [13]   M.Th. Makhlouf, S.A. El-Shatoery, A. El-said, Mater. Chem. Phys. 43
4. Conclusions                                                                       (1996) 76.
                                                                              [14]   E.E. Oguzie, B.N. Okolue, E.E. Ebenso, G.N. Onuoha, A.I. Onuchukwu,
• Results from the two techniques employed shows PA as effec-                        Mater. Chem. Phys. 87 (2004) 394.
  tive inhibitor for the corrosion of mild steel in H2 SO4 .                  [15]   E.E. Oguzie, A.I. Onuchukwu, P.C. Okafor, E.E. Ebenso, Pigment Resin
                                                                                     Technol. 35 (2) (2006) 63.
• Increased temperature increases corrosion rate but decreases                [16]   S.A. Umoren, E.E. Ebenso, P.C. Okafor, U.J. Ekpe, O. Ogbobe, J. Appl.
  the inhibition. Inhibition efficiency was found to increase with                   Polym. Sci. 103 (5) (2007) 2810.
  increase in concentration of PA.                                            [17]   L. Larabi, Y. Harek, Portugalae Electrochim. Acta 22 (2004) 227.
• Synergistic effects between PA and KI have been observed.                   [18]   L. Larabi, Y. Harek, M. Traisnel, A. Mansri, J. Appl. Electrochem. 34
  The addition of KI enhances the inhibition efficiency signifi-                     (2004) 833.
                                                                              [19]   Y.C. Wu, P. Zhang, H.W. Pickering, D.L. Allara, J. Electrochem. Soc. 140
  cantly.                                                                            (1993) 2791.
• The adsorption of PA, KI and (PA + KI) on mild steel sur-                   [20]   D.P. Schweinberg, S.P. Bottle, V. Otieno-Alego, J. Appl. Electrochem. 27
  face from 1 M H2 SO4 obeys Freundlich, Temkin and Flory–                           (1997) 161.
  Huggins adsorption isotherms.                                               [21]   M. Abdallah, E.A. Helal, A.S. Founda, Corros. Sci. 48 (7) (2006) 1639.
• Phenomenon of physical adsorption is proposed from the                      [22]   D.Q. Zhang, L.X. Gao, G.D. Zhou, J. Appl. Electrochem. 33 (2003)
                                                               ◦                     361.
  values of kinetic/thermodynamics parameter (Ea , Gads )                    [23]   S.A. Umoren, I.B. Obot, E.E. Ebenso, P.C. Okafor, O. Ogbobe, E.E. Oguzie,
  obtained.                                                                          Anti-corros. Meth. Mater. 53 (5) (2006) 277.
• The adsorption of PA, KI and (PA + KI) onto mild steel surface              [24]   K.M. Ye, Mater. Protect. (Chinese) 23 (1990) 37.
  was a spontaneous process, the driving force for the adsorp-                [25]   X. Li, L. Tang, L. Li, G. Mu, G. Liv, Corros. Sci. 48 (2006) 308–321.
  tion process being the reduction in the adsorption enthalpy                 [26]   S.S. Abd El-Rehim, M.A.M. Ibrahim, K.F. Khalid, Mater. Chem. Phys. 70
                                                                                     (2001) 201.
  rather than the increase in adsorption entropy.                             [27]   G. Moretti, G. Quartanone, A. Tassan, A. Zingales, Werkst. Korros. 45
                                                                                     (1994) 641.
References                                                                    [28]   H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, N. Ghalebsaz-Jeddi, Mater. Chem. Phys. 92 (2005)
                                                                                     480.
[1] G.K. Gomma, Asian J. Chem. 5 (3) (1993) 761.                              [29]   Libin Tang, Xueming Li, Yusen Si, Guannan Mu, Guang-Hang Liu, Mater.
[2] G.K. Gomma, Mater. Chem. Phys. 54 (1998) 241–246.                                Chem. Phys. 95 (2006) 26.
[3] S.A. Umoren, O. Ogbobe, E.E. Ebenso, U.J. Ekpe, Pigment Resin Technol.    [30]   S.A.M. Refeay, F. Taha, A.M. Abd El-Malar, Appl. Surf. Sci. 236 (2004)
    35 (3) (2006) 284.                                                               175.
[4] S.A. Umoren, O. Ogbobe, E.E. Ebenso, Bull. Electrochem. 22 (4) (2006)     [31]   F. Bentiss, M. Trainel, M. Lagrenee, J. Appl. Electrochem. 31 (2001) 41.
    155.                                                                      [32]   S. Martinez, I. Stern, J. Appl. Electrochem. 33 (2001) 973.
[5] E.E. Ebenso, U.J. Ekpe, S.A. Umoren, Ekerete Jackson, O.K. Abiola, N.C.   [33]   E.E. Oguzie, Mater. Chem. Phys. 87 (2004) 212.
    Oforka, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 100 (4) (2006) 2889.                         [34]   A. Popova, E. Sokolova, S. Raicheva, M. Christov, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003)
[6] E.E. Oguzie, Mater. Chem. Phys. 99 (2–3) (2006) 441.                             33.
[7] E.E. Oguzie, G.N. Onuoha, A.I. Onuchukwu, Anti-corros. Meth. Mater. 52    [35]   S. Bilgic, M. Sahin, Mater. Chem. Phys. 70 (2001) 290.
    (3) (2005) 293.                                                           [36]   M.A. Quraishi, H.K. Sharma, J. Appl. Electrochem. 3 (2005) 33.
[8] E.E. Oguzie, Pigment Resin Technol. 34 (6) (2005) 321.                    [37]   A.Y. Etre, Corros. Sci. 45 (2003) 2495.