ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ                                                                                     Page 1 of 3
ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ .ﻧﻮﺷﺘﻪ :ﺟﻴﻞ ﻻﻣﺒﺮﺕ ﻣﺘﺮﺟﻢ :ﻣﻬﺮﻱ ﺻﺪﻳﻘﻲ .ﻧﺎﺷﺮ :ﻣﺮﮐﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻣﺪﺍﺭﮎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ
        ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ .ﺳﺎﻝ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ  .١٣٨٠ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ:ﻋﻠﻲ ﺣﺴﻴﻦ ﻗﺎﺳﻤﻲ .ﺑﻪ ﻛﻮﺷﺶ :ﻣﺤﻤﻮﺩ ﺑﺎﺑﺎﺋﻲ  .ﻧﻮﺑﺖ ﭼﺎﭖ :ﺍﻭﻝ ) (١٣٨٠ﻗﻴﻤﺖ:
                                                                       ٥٥٠٠ﺭﻳﺎﻝ .ﺷﺎﺑﻚ٩٦٤-٧٥١٩-٠١-× :
                                                                                     . ٢ﻣﺸﺎﻭﺭﻩ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﻲ
ﻧﻘﻄﻪﻱ ﺷـﺮﻭﻉ ﻫـﺮ ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤـﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨـﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ  .ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺣﻴﺎﺗﻲ
ﺑـﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳـﺖ ﻭ ﺷـﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ  .ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
    ﺑﺎﻟﻘﻮﻩ ﺍﺭﺯﺷﻤﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ،ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ـ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﺪﺍﻧﻨﺪ ـ ﺑﻪ ﺗﻮﺍﻧﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﺎﻥ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ
ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ  .ﺩﺭ ﻫﻨﮕـﺎﻡ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺬﻑ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻧﺎﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ ،ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ  .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﻲ
 ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺨﻤﻴـﻦ ﺳـﻄﺢ ﺍﺣﺘﻤـﺎﻟﻲ ﺗﻘﺎﺿـﺎ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ،ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﺗﻘﺎﺿﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﺠﻮﺯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻓﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻧﻴﺰ
                                                                                                  ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ.
 ﺑﻬـﺮ ﺣـﺎﻝ ،ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻳﻚ ﺗﺎﺯﻩﻭﺍﺭﺩ ،ﺑﻮﻳﮋﻩ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻮﺯﻩ ﻳﺎ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ ﻧﺎﺁﺷﻨﺎ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ
ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﺮﻛـﺰ ﺑـﻪ ﭼـﻪ ﭼـﻴﺰﻱ ﻧﻴـﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻫﻤﺮﺍﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺮﺱ ﻭ ﺑﻴﻢ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺘﻮﻥ ﺯﻳﺎﺩﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ
                            ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺑﺨﺶ ﺧﻴﻠﻲ ﻛﻮﭼﻜﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﻩ ﻋﻤﻠﻲ ﻧﺤﻮﻩﻱ ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﻲﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻧﺪ.
 ﺑﻪﺩﺳﺖﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﻳـﻚ ﺷـﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﻔﺼـﻴﻠﻲ ﻧﻴـﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺗـﻼﺵ ﺍﺳـﺖ ـ ﻫـﺮ ﭼـﻨﺪ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗـﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻏﻮﻏﺎﮔﺮ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ
ﻣﻲﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻃﻠﺐ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﺍﻣﺎ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻛﺜﺮﻳﺖ ﺧﺎﻣﻮﺵ ،ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻝﺗﺮﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ  .ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺭﺯﻳﺎﺑﻲ ﻣﺴﺘﻠﺰﻡ
  ﻣﺴـﺘﻠﺰﻡ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩﻫـﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪﻱ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺧﺎﺻﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻟﻲ ﻛﻪ
                                                                                  ﺑﻘﻴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﻋﺎﻡ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
                                                                                            ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ
ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺵﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﺻـﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻫـﺮ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ،ﺍﻗﺪﺍﻡ ﺑﺮ ﺍﺳﺎﺱ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻ ﹰﺎ
   ﺁﻥﻫـﺎ ﻛـﻪ ﻳـﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﭘﺎﺳـﺦ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﻣﺸـﻜﻞ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﻏﺎﻟﺒـ ﹰﺎ ﺷﺎﺧﺺﻫﺎﻱ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ
ﺑﻴﺶﺗـﺮﻱ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ  .ﻳـﻚ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻉ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻣﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
   ﺗﻘﺎﺿـﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﻛﻢ ﻛﻢ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺧﺼﻮﺻ ﹰﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺳﻂ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻣﺘﻌﺪﺩ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﻩ
   ﻣﻲﺷـﻮﺩ ،ﻧﮕﻬـﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ،ﻳﺎ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺮﺳﺶﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ
                                                                         ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﻚ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﻨﺪﺓ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺣﺎﻓﻈﻪ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ.
   ﻣﻨـﺒﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﻳﮋﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻤﻮﻣﻲ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ
ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺷﺨﺼـ ﹰﺎ ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺯﺭﻭﻛﺮﺩﻥ ﻭ ﺳﻴﺴﺘﻢ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ  .ﺍﺻﻮ ﹰﻻ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺩﺭ
ﺩﻭ ﺩﺳـﺘﻪ ﺟﺎﻱ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ  :ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﺰﻳﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ
                                                            ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻬﻴﻪ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ.
ﺷـﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖﮔـﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﻱ ﺩﻭﻡ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻲﮔﻴﺮﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ .ﻫﺮ ﻣﻌﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ
   ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺗﺼﻤﻴﻢﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﻭﺩ ،ﻣﻬﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻠﻲ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺪ ﻣﺎﺷﻴﻨﻲ
ﭘﺮﺩﺍﺧﺘـﻪ ﻧﺸـﻮﺩ ،ﻭﮔﺮﻧﻪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺩﺳﺘﻴﺎﺑﻲ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ  .ﺗﻤﺎﻣﻲ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ
   ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈـﺮ ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻫﻤﻴـﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻩ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺑﺸﻮﻧﺪ ﻳﺎ ﻧﻪ ،ﻫﻤﮕﻲ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-2.htm                                                     29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ                                                                                Page 2 of 3
                                                                            ﻣﺸﺘﺮﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ.
  ﺩﺭ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫـﺎ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺣﺪﻫـﺎﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﺨﺼﺼﻲﺗـﺮ ،ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﭘﺮﺱﻭﺟﻮﻫﺎ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﺍﻣّﺎ ﺍﺻﻮﻝ ﻣﺸﺎﺑﻬﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻼ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺧﻂﺳﻴﺮ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻬﺖ ﮔﻴﺮﻱ       ﻧﻈـﺎﺭﺕ ﺑـﺮ ﺁﻥﻫـﺎ ﺑـﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ  .ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻓﻌﺎﻟﻴﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ  .ﺍﻧﺠﺎﻡ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭﮊﻩ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺸﻒ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ ﺩﺍﺋﻤﻲ ﻳﺎ
                                                                                  ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ.
                                                                                                  ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮ
 ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﻭ ﺗﺪﺍﻭﻡ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺧﻮﺏ ﺑﺎ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻫﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻛﺎﻧﺎﻝﻫﺎﻱ ﻏﻴﺮﺭﺳﻤﻲ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻲ ،ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻥ
ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻳﻜﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻋﻴﻦﺣﺎﻝ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﮔﻔﺘﮕﻮﻱ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺩﺭ
ﻼ ﺗﺤﻮﻳﻞ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﻈﻴﺮ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻛﺎﻭﺵ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺷﺨﺺ ،ﺑﻪﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ      ﺩﺭ ﻫـﺮ ﻓﺮﺻـﺖ ﻣﻤﻜـﻦ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﻣـﺜ ﹰ
 ﺍﺳـﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺴـﺖ ﺍﻟﻜﺘﺮﻭﻧﻴﻜﻲ ﻳﺎ ﭘﺴﺖ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ـ ﻏﺎﻟﺒ ﹰﺎ ﻛﺴﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻭ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﻨﻴﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻣﻨﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ
ﺗﻤﺎﺱﻫـﺎ ﺑﻴﺶﺗـﺮ ﺑﺎﺷـﻨﺪ ،ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﻱ ﺧﺪﻣـﺎﺕ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ .ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﭘﺮﻣﺸﻐﻠﻪ ،ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻦ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻲﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ
 ﻼ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ  ﻛـﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻧﻈـﺮﺧﻮﺍﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺸـﺎﻥ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﻛﺸﻒ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
ﻣﻲﺩﺍﻧـﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭﺩﻧـﺎﻙ ﺍﺳﺖ  .ﺑﻬﺮﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﻌﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺭﻳﺎﻓﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ ﺭﺟﻮﻉ ،ﻫﻤﻮﺍﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻴﺪ
                                                                         ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺁﮔﺎﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﺍﺳﺖ.
 ﺩﺭ ﻳـﻚ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﻪﻱ ﺗﺠـﺎﺭﻱ ﻳـﺎ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ،ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻱ ﺗﻤﺎﺱ ﺑﺎ ﺭﺅﺳﺎﻱ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎ ﻳﺎ ﻗﺴﻤﺖﻫﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﺆﺛﺮﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ
ﻛﺸـﻒ ﻣﺴـﻴﺮ ﻋﻼﺋـﻖ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣـﺪﺕ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﺗﻌﻴﻴـﻦ ﻗـﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻱ ،ﻭﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻣﻌﺎﺭﻓﻪ ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ
ﻋﻤﻮﻣـﻲ ﻣﺆﺛـﺮ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﺷﻤﺎ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﻱ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﻲ ﻛﻮﺗﺎﻩ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﻤﺎ ـ ﻳﺎ ﻳﻚ ﻭﺟﻪ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ـ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ
ﻼ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻣﺤﻴﻂ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻲ ،ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻳﻚ     ﻓﺮﺻـﺖ ﺧﻮﺑـﻲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﻠﺐ ﺑﺎﺯﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﻋﻼﺋﻘﺸﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﻣﺜ ﹰ
   ﺳﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻖ ،ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﺳﻤﻴﻨﺎﺭ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ ﭘﺮﻭﮊﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﻧﺪ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ.
 ﺑﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻤﻲﺗﺮ ،ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺭﻭﺯﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﻱ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺗﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻥ ﻣﺆﺳﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ
ﮔﺮﻓﺘـﻪ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ .ﺩﺭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﺴﺮﺍﻫﺎ ﺩﺳﺘﻮﺭ ﺟﻠﺴﻪﻱ ﻛﻤﻴﺘﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﻜﺪﻩ ،ﺁﻣﻮﺯﺷﮕﺎﻩ ﻭ ﺳﺎﻳﺮ ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎﺗﻲ،
 ﺷـﺎﻣﻞ ﻃﺮﺡﻫـﺎﻳﻲ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﺩﻭﺭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺗﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺴﻴﺮ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ؛ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻳﻲ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ
      ﺍﺳﺎﺳﻲ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻤﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺟﻠﺴﺎﺗﻲ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
                                                                                                      ﻣﺂﺧﺬ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ
   ﺍﮔـﺮ ﭼـﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﺩﻗﻴﻖ ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻳﻚ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ـ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲﻫﺎﻱ ﺳﺎﻻﻧﻪ ،ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ،ﻧﺸﺮﻳﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻳﺮ ﺁﻥ ـ
 ﺭﺍﻫﻨﻤـﺎﻱ ﭼﻨﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﺑﺨﺸﻲ ﺑﻪﻧﻈﺮ ﻧﻤﻲﺭﺳﺪ ﺍﻣﺎ ﭼﻪﺑﺴﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻣﺰﺍﻳﺎﻳﻲ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﭘﻴﺸﺮﻓﺖ ﻳﻚ ﭘﺮﻭﮊﻩﻱ ﺗﺤﻘﻴﻘﺎﺗﻲ ﻋﻤﻮﻣ ﹰﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻜﻞ
 ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﻗﺘﻲ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ ،ﻣﻜﺘﻮﺏ ﻣﻲﺷﻮﺩ ﻭ ﻏﺎﻟﺒ ﹰﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺣﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ،ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻪﺳﺎﺯﻱ ﻭ ﺫﺧﻴﺮﻩ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ .ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻳﻜﻲ
ﻳﻜـﻲ ﺩﻭ ﺻﻔﺤﻪﻱ ﺍﻭّﻝ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﻱ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺍﻣﻨﻪ ﻭ ﻣﻘﻴﺎﺱ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺧﺒﺮﻧﺎﻣﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻲ ﻣﻌﻤﻮ ﹰﻻ
  ﺷـﺮﺣﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨـﺎﻥ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ـ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻔﻴﺪﻱ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ
                                                  ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪﻱ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻭ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺭﺳﺎﻧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻣﺎﻩﻫﺎ ﻭﻗﺖ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﺩ.
ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣـﺎﺕ ﻋﻠﻤـﻲ ـ ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸـﻲ ،ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺍﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧﻲ ﻋﻨﺼﺮ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻌﻴﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ  .ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ
   ﻛﺴـﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ﻣﻄﻠﹼﻊ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ،ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺪﺭﺳﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺎﺩﺍﻥ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻃﻪ
     ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨ ﹰﺎ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ،ﻳﻚ ﺭﻭﻳﻜﺮﺩ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ـ ﻭ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﻴﮕﻴﺮﺍﻧﻪ ـ ﻻﺯﻡ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﻫﻨﮕﺎﻡ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖ ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖ
ﻓﻬﺮﺳﺖﻫـﺎ ،ﺟﺎ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﺮﺳﻴﺪﻩ ﺷﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻳﺎ ﻋﻨﺎﻭﻳﻦ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﺯﻳﺮ ﺩﺳﺘﻪﺑﻨﺪﻱ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺧﻴﺮ :ﻣﻮﺍﺩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻧـﻲ ﭘﺎﻳـﻪ ،ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺕ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﻪﺍﻱ ،ﻭ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩﻱ ﻛـﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﻈـﺎﺭ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﺧـﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﻧﺸـﺠﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ  .ﺑﺪﻳﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﻴﺐ ﺍﻳﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﺍﺯ
                                                              ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻟﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻫﺮ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻣﻲﺁﻳﺪ.
   ﺍﻧﺠـﺎﻡ ﻳـﻚ ﭘﻴﻤـﺎﻳﺶ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻘﻴـﺎﺱ ﻛﻮﭼﻚ ﺍﮔﺮ ﭼﻪ ﻭﻗﺘﮕﻴﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺷﻴﻮﻩﻱ ﺭﻭﺵﻣﻨﺪﻱ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﭘﻲ ﺑﺮﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-2.htm                                                29/05/1381
ﺍﻨﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻤﻨﺎﺒﻊ ﺍﻁﻼﻋﺎﺘﻰ                                                                                  Page 3 of 3
                                                            ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺑﺪﻳﻬﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺸﺪﺍﺭﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﻛﺮﺩ:
ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﻱ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑـﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪﻩﻱ ﺟﻤﻊ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻫﻴﭻ ﺳﺆﺍﻝ »ﺳﻮ «ﺩﻫﻨﺪﻩﺍﻱ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ
  ﺗﻮﺟـﻪ ﺷـﺪﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻧﻤﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﻫﻨﺪ ،ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻟﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﺎﺭﺷﺎﻥ
ﻳﻜﻲ ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ  .ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩﻳﺖﻫﺎ ،ﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﺶ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻥ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ ـ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﻪ
ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺎﻁ ﺍﺻﻠﻲ ﻛﻤﺒﻮﺩ ﻳﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻗﺪﻳﻤﻲ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﺨﺘﻲ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺩﺳﺘﺮﺳﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺩﺭﻧﮓ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ  .ﮔﻮﺍﻩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻲ ﺍﺯ
            ﺳﻮﻱ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ،ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﮔﺬﺍﺭﻱ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺟﺪﻳﺪ ،ﺳﺮﻣﺎﻳﻪﻱ ﺧﻮﺑﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ.
 ﺩﺭ ﻣـﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﻛـﻪ ﻣـﻴﺰﺍﻥ ﻗـﺎﺑﻞ ﺳﻨﺠﺸـﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮﺩﻱ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺭﻭﺵ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ،ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ ﺍﺭﻗﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﻭ
ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫـﺎﻱ ﺭﺯﺭﻭ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﺪ  .ﺑﻬـﺮ ﺣـﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻴـﻦ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪﻱ ﺷﺎﺧﺼﻪﻫـﺎﻱ ﻋﻼﻗﻪﻣـﻨﺪﻱ ﻭ ﮔﺮﺍﻳﺶ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﺒﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﻭﺭ
     ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺯﻩﮔﻴﺮﻱ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ  .ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﻣﻲﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺳﺮﻧﺦ
ﺳﺮﻧﺦﻫـﺎﻳﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻣـﻮﺍﺩ ﻣﻮﺭﺩﻧﻴـﺎﺯﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺤﻞ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺩﻫﺪ  .ﺑﻪ ﻟﺤﺎﻅ ﻧﻈﺮﻱ ،ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻈﺎﻡ
ﻛﺘـﺎﺑﮕﺮﺩﺍﻧﻲ ﻣﺎﺷـﻴﻨﻲ ،ﺗﺤﻠـﻴﻞ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ ﺁﻣﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﻧﺴﺒﺘ ﹰﺎ ﺁﺳﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ  .ﺍﺳﺘﺨﺮﺍﺝ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭ ،ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﺎﺭﺷﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺰﺋﻴﺎﺕ
ﺑﻲﺭﺑـﻂ ،ﻳـﺎ ﺻـﺮﻑ ﺯﻣـﺎﻥ ﻓﻮﻕﺍﻟﻌﺎﺩﻩ ﺯﻳﺎﺩ ،ﻫﻤﻴﺸﻪ ﻫﻢ ﺳﺎﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ  .ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﻢﺗﺮ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻣﻨﺪ ﻭﻟﻲ ﻣﻔﻴﺪ ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻲ ﻣﻨﻈﻢ ﻗﻔﺴﻪﻫﺎﻱ
  ﺭﺯﺭﻭ ،ﻛﺘﺎﺏﻫـﺎﻱ ﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮ ﺑﺮﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﻔﺴﻪ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﻣﺎﻧﺖ ﺑﻴﻦﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺍﺳﺖ ـ ﺯﻳﺮﺍ ﺍﻳﻦﻫﺎ ﺍﻗﻼﻣﻲ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺟﺰﻭ
                                                                                       ﺩﺭﺧﻮﺍﺳﺖﻫﺎﻱ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
 ﺍﻳـﻦ ﺍﺧﺘﻴـﺎﺭ ﻧـﻴﺰ ﺑـﺮﺍﻱ ﻫـﺮ ﻛﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧـﻪ ﻳـﺎ ﻭﺍﺣـﺪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋـﺎﺗﻲ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻤ ﹰﺎ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﻳﻚ ﺻﻨﺪﻭﻕ
ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩﻫﺎ ،ﻳﺎ ﺑﻮﺳﻴﻠﻪﻱ ﭼﺎﭘﻲ ﺟﻮﻳﺎ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ  .ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻨ ﹰﺎ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ،ﺍﻧﺘﻘﺎﺩﺁﻣﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺟﻤﻼﺗﻲ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺒﻴﻞ » :ﻣﻦ ﻛﻠﹼﻲ
ﻛﻠﹼـﻲ ﻣﻨﺘﻈـﺮ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻡ ﻛـﻪ  «. . .ﺭﺍ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭﻟﻲ ﺍﻣﻴﺪ ﻣﻲﺭﻭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻲ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺗﻌﺮﻳﻒﻫﺎﻳﻲ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛـﻪ »ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨـﺎﻥ ﺷـﻤﺎ ﺧﻴﻠـﻲ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ .«. . .ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻈﺮﺍﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻴﺚ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ،ﻧﺘﺎﻳﺞ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻲ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ،ﻧﻈﻴﺮ
  ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺤﺎﺗﻲ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻮﺯﻩﻫﺎﻱ ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮﻱ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﻳﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺭﺩﻱ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻧﺴﺨﻪﻫﺎﻱ ﺍﺿﺎﻓﻲ
                                                                   ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻨﺒﻊ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺧﺮﻳﺪﺍﺭﻱ ﮔﺮﺩﺩ ﻣﺸﺨﺺ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﻨﺪ.
                                                                                                    ﺧﻼﺻﻪﻛﺮﺩﻥ
  ﺑـﺎ ﻣﺮﻭﺭ ﻧﻴﺎﺯﻫﺎ ﻭ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ،ﻧﻜﺎﺕ ﻣﻬﻤﻲ ـ ﺩﺭﺑﺎﺭﻩﻱ ﭘﺴﺰﻣﻴﻨﻪ ،ﺍﻟﮕﻮﻫﺎﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﻱ ،ﺭﻭﺵﻫﺎﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﺟﺴﺘﺠﻮﻱ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ،
ﻼ
ﺳﻄﺢ ﻣﻬﺎﺭﺕﻫﺎﻱ ﺭﺍﻳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻱ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ـ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ  .ﺩﺭ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺗﻲ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ـ ﻣﺜ ﹰ
  ﻼ ﺁﮔـﺎﻫﻲ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳـﻦ ﻛـﻪ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮ ﻛﺎﺭﻛﻨﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺍﻳﺴﺘﮕﺎﻩ ﺧﺎﺹ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻩ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﻂ    ﻣـﺜ ﹰ
ﻣﻲﺑﺎﺷـﺪ ،ﮔـﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﺍﺷـﺘﺮﺍﻙ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ »ﺑﻴﺪﺯ« )ﺧﺪﻣﺎﺕ ﭘﻴﻮﺳﺘﻪﻱ ﺩﺍﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﻲ ﺑﺮﺍﻱ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﻲ( ﺭﺍ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﻣﻲﻛﻨﺪ .ﻫﻤﭽﻨﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ
 ﻳـﻚ ﻣﺤـﻴﻂ ﺑﺎﺯﺭﮔﺎﻧﻲ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻜﺘﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺴﻴﺎﺭﻱ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻃﻼﻋﺎﺕ ﺟﺎﺭﻱ ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ،ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎ ﹰﻻ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺧﺮﻳﺪ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻳﺴﻚ
ﻧـﻮﺭﻱ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﻭ ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﻝ ﺭﻭﺯﺁﻣﺪ ﻣﻲﮔﺮﺩﺩ ،ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ  .ﻫﺪﻑ ،ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻌﻲ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﻴﺶﺗﺮﻱ ﺑﺎ ﻋﻼﺋﻖ
                                ﻣﻮﺿﻮﻋﻲ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ،ﺑﻠﻜﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻃﻼﻉﺟﻮﻳﻲ ﻭ ﺭﻭﺵ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﻣﻨﻄﺒﻖﺗﺮ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ.
file://D:\IRANDOC\Data\Books\Resource\resource-2.htm                                                  29/05/1381