Illinois iGaming Economic Impact
Illinois iGaming Economic Impact
of iGaming
Supplement for Illinois
April 2, 2024
The conclusions and opinions expressed are exclusively those of the authors and not of Analysis Group.
Support for this study was provided by the Sports Betting Alliance.
The Potential Economic Impact of iGaming (Supplement for Illinois)
Mickey Ferri, Vice President; Ph.D., economics. Dr. Ferri specializes in applied business
economics and has extensive experience in economic analysis, business strategy, and data
analysis. His work includes market analyses, revenue projections, analysis of actual versus
but-for scenarios, economic damages, and commercial success. Dr. Ferri has served as an
economics expert or consultant in more than 60 engagements in U.S. federal and state courts
and has submitted over 30 expert reports and declarations. He has consulted to clients in
industries such as entertainment, consumer products, real estate, pharmaceuticals, finance,
cybersecurity, natural resources, and sports. He has been recognized as a top patent expert in
the IAM Patent 1000.
Laura O’Laughlin, Vice President; M.Sc., economics. Ms. O’Laughlin has developed,
administered, and analyzed surveys in trademark, intellectual property (IP), antitrust,
consumer protection, and false advertising litigation matters. She has served as an expert
witness and manages case teams in support of academic and industry experts in a broad
range of matters involving merger reviews, antitrust disputes, competition policy, labor
relations, valuation, trademark, IP, and patent infringement. In the non-litigation context, Ms.
O’Laughlin uses complex research methods and modeling and applies innovative analytical
approaches to provide new insights on the competitive and market challenges that clients
face in managing and expanding their businesses.
The authors would like to thank Viraj Jorapur, Marimer Guevara, Joe Bourdage, Matthew Richman, Jonathan Gong,
Lexi Gu, Vatsala Ramanan, Raul Gulrajani, Kate Schoenbach, Justin LaTorraca, Juan Estrada, Ananya Sen, Thuy
Le, Ellie Miller, Sean Flanagan, Hana Dai, Frank Kim, Angelina Cao, Benjamin Harvey, Patrice Geffrard, and Yonatan
Melamed for their valuable contributions.
Analysis Group is one of the largest international economics consulting firms, with more than 1,200 professionals
across 14 offices in North America, Europe, and Asia. Since 1981, we have provided expertise in economics, finance,
health care analytics, and strategy to top law firms, Fortune Global 500 companies, and government agencies
worldwide. Our internal experts, together with our network of affiliated experts from academia, industry, and
government, offer our clients exceptional breadth and depth of expertise.
THE POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF IGAMING:
SUPPLEMENT FOR ILLINOIS
April 2, 2024
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Summary of Revenue Analysis. This supplement summarizes the results from the study
conducted by Mickey A. Ferri and Laura O’Laughlin from Analysis Group, entitled “The Potential
Economic Impact of Legalizing iGaming on Casino Revenues in Five States,” March 2024
(hereafter AG iGaming Report (2024)). Based on the projected increase in growth of Land-based
casino and VGT revenues, projected contributions of four new permanent casinos, and new
iGaming revenues, the projected impact on Land-based and total casino revenues in Illinois is as
follows (Figure 12 here and Figure 82 in the AG iGaming Report (2024)1):
1. Projected increase in VGT revenues. Annual VGT revenues are projected to increase from $2.7
billion in 2024 to $3.7 billion in 2029 (a $910 million increase, or 33%).2 Of the projected
$910 million increase in VGT revenues, (1) $577 million is projected based on Illinois’ current
growth rate, and (2) an additional $332 million is projected from the increased anticipated
growth in Land-based revenues associated with iGaming.3
2. Projected increase in Land-based casino revenues. Annual Land-based casino revenues are
projected to increase from $1.5 billion in 2024 to $2.4 billion in 2029 (a $895 million increase,
or 58%). 4 Of the projected $895 million increase in casino revenues, (1) $160 million is
projected based on Illinois’ current growth rate, (2) an additional $167 million is projected
from the increased anticipated growth in Land-based revenues associated with iGaming, and
(3) $568 million is projected to come from the four new casinos in the Chicago metro area.
4. Projected increase in total market size. In total, Land-based and iGaming revenues combined
are projected to grow from $4.3 billion in 2024 to $8.4 billion in 2029 (a 95% increase). This
large increase is attributable to Illinois’ large population and its demonstrably large sports
betting revenues.
1
AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 151. See also AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54.
2
($3,651 million - $2,741 million) / $2,741 million = 33%.
3
The totals do not add up to $910 million due to rounding. See also AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54. iGaming
has been associated with increased Land-based casino revenues in the six states where iGaming is legal, with an
average Land-based Treatment Effect of +1.9% (AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 9). In other words, on average, the
states that have implemented iGaming have seen Land-based revenues grow faster than they were trending before they
implemented iGaming by 1.9 percentage points per year.
4
($2,441 million - $1,546 million) / $1,546 million = 58%. The 2029 projection ($2,441 million) includes estimated
revenues from new casinos opening in Illinois.
AG iGaming Report (2024): Illinois – April 2, 2024
Page 2 of 31
1. iGaming is expected to create additional jobs among iGaming operators. These jobs include,
for example, live dealers, customer service, customer retention, marketing, and operations.
Census data support the notion that there are a substantial number of new gambling jobs in
iGaming states in the category that includes iGaming jobs, which is labeled as “Other
Gambling Industries.” When comparing the number of jobs in this category before iGaming
was legalized to the most current data available, New Jersey showed an increase of 1,790 new
jobs, Pennsylvania showed an increase of 773 new jobs, Michigan showed an increase of 112
new jobs, and West Virginia showed an increase of 98 new jobs.5 To the extent live dealers
operate in Illinois, based on data from one live dealer company and one casino operator, it is
reasonable to expect at least 1,100 new jobs in Illinois from iGaming as a very conservative
estimate, and likely substantially more jobs. See Section VI.A.
2. iGaming is unlikely to have a negative impact on jobs supported by the Land-based casino
industry in Illinois, based on the observed changes in New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania,
West Virginia, Michigan, and Connecticut relative to all other states that have not legalized
iGaming. From 2017 to 2022, during the time iGaming was being implemented and growing
in the iGaming States, jobs supported by the Land-based casino industry in iGaming states
grew by an annual average of 9.4%. Further, when comparing job growth in the iGaming states
versus non-iGaming states as a control group, the iGaming states outperformed the non-
iGaming states by 0.6% to 5.4% per year. See Section VI.B.
3. Based on observed trends in other states with legalized iGaming, including an overall increase
in Land-based casino gross gaming revenues of 1.9% relative to pre-iGaming trends, iGaming
legalization is expected to be associated with an increase in Land-based casino activity, which
is expected to lead to additional jobs to service the additional activity. See Section VI.C.
Projected impact of VGT growth on jobs. Projections are made for VGT job growth based on
projected VGT revenue growth and BLS census data on gambling jobs for “Other Gambling
Industries,” the jobs category that contains VGTs. These jobs are new long-term jobs for the
Illinois gambling industry (in addition to iGaming jobs). See Figure 16 and Figure 18.
5. The additional direct impact of VGT jobs in Illinois (including catalytic spending and sustained
capital investment over time) comes from the additional direct gaming jobs in Illinois that are
projected to increase from 1,302 in 2023 to 1,817 in 2029 (an increase of 515 jobs, or 40%).
See Section IV.E.
6. The total local market impact in Illinois (including additional supply chain jobs (indirect) and
consumer spending induced effects) is projected to increase from 14,657 in 2023 to 20,448 in
5
Exhibit 1 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
2029 (an increase of 5,791 jobs, or 40%). These jobs are driven, for example, by additional
jobs for businesses to support the spending of salaries earned by people working at the new
jobs from anticipated VGT growth. See Section IV.E.
Projected impact of increased casino revenues and four new casinos on long-term gambling-related
jobs. Projections are made for casino job growth based on the increased casino revenues and four
new casinos in or around the Chicago area. These are new long-term casino jobs associated with
the Illinois gaming industry (in addition to the iGaming jobs). See Figure 17 and Figure 19.
7. Considering only the jobs corresponding to employees of casinos and casino hotels, Land-
based casino jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from 5,462 in 2023 to 8,797 in 2029 (an
increase of 3,335 jobs, or 61%), driven primarily by 2,046 casino jobs associated with the four
new casinos. See Section IV.D.
8. The additional direct impact in Illinois, including catalytic spending and sustained capital
investment over time, stems from the projected increase in direct gaming jobs. These jobs are
expected to increase from 1,463 in 2023 to 2,356 in 2029 (an increase of 893 jobs, or 61%).
See Section IV.E.
9. The total local market impact in Illinois, including additional supply chain jobs (indirect) and
consumer spending (induced) effects, is projected to increase from 16,462 in 2023 to 26,513
in 2029 (an increase of 10,051 jobs, or 61%). These jobs are driven, for example, by the
additional jobs created by businesses to support the spending of salaries earned by people
working at the new jobs from the four new casinos. See Section IV.E.
10. Impact of four new casinos on construction jobs. Based on public sources, the construction
associated with these four new casinos is estimated to generate 7,800 jobs for around 1.5 to 2
years while all four casinos are constructed. See Section VII.
VGT revenue projections in Illinois. The revenues for the VGTs in Illinois from 2025-2029 are
calculated as follows:
1. Most cities in Illinois allow VGTs. In 2022, there were 45,008 VGTs throughout the state,6
and they generated $2.7 billion in revenue.7 VGT revenues have grown linearly from 2012
through 2023. On average, VGT revenues have grown by $230 million per year each year over
this period. See Figure 1.
2. While this trend has continued linearly for the past ten years, it has been flattening from 2021
through 2023. To account for both scenarios of potential continued growth at the same linear
rate and a flattening trend going forward, the revenues are projected as the average of the linear
trend from 2012 through 2023 and a flat trend.
3. Using this approach, VGT revenues are projected to grow from $2.7 billion in 2024 to $3.3
billion in 2029 without the effects of iGaming. See Figure 1.
Figure 1: Projected VGT Revenues Without iGaming Using the Average of Estimates
Based on the Historical Growth Rate and Constant 2023 Revenues
6
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 94.
7
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 48A.
4. The Land-based Treatment Effect is applied to account for the overall market expanding effect
of iGaming on VGT revenues. In each year, the Land-based Treatment Effect represents an
incremental CAGR of 1.9% in the VGT growth attributable to iGaming.8 See Figure 2.
Figure 2: Illinois Projected VGT Revenue Growth Rate Before and After iGaming9
Without iGaming, VGT revenues in Illinois are projected to grow at an implied CAGR of 3.9%
annually from 2024 to 2029. The Land-based Treatment Effect from the AG iGaming Report
(2024) is 1.9%.10 Therefore, Illinois projected annual VGT growth rate after iGaming is 5.8%
(3.9% + 1.9%). In other words, VGT revenues are projected to grow from $2.6 billion in 2023 to
$3.7 billion in 2029.11 Additional supporting charts and tables can be found in the AG iGaming
Report (2024), at Sections VIII.B and XI.B.
Land-Based Casino Revenues. Land-based casino revenues are projected by applying the
average Land-based Treatment Effect from the six iGaming states (i.e., New Jersey, Delaware,
Pennsylvania, Michigan, West Virginia, and Connecticut) to Illinois’ existing growth rate of Land-
based Casino revenues.
Figure 3: Illinois Projected Land-Based Casino Growth Rate Before and After iGaming
Illinois’ existing growth rate of Land-based casino revenues has been 2.0% from 2018 to 2023.
The “Land-based Treatment Effect” from the AG iGaming Report (2024) is 1.9%.12 Therefore,
Illinois’ projected growth rate after iGaming is 3.9% (2.0% + 1.9%). Before accounting for any
additional revenues due to the four new casinos, Land-based revenues are projected to grow from
8
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54.
9
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54.
10
AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 9.
11
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54.
12
AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 9.
$1.5 billion in 2024 to $1.9 billion in 2029.13 The supporting charts and tables are in the AG
iGaming Report (2024).
Explanations of the Land-Based Treatment Effect for both Land-based casinos and VGTs.
There are multiple explanations for why iGaming is associated with increased Land-based
revenues and VGTs, which are supported by a survey conducted by Analysis Group (“AG State
Gambling Survey”), consumer research interviews conducted by AG, and external research. The
explanations for increasing Land-based revenues from the demand side include:
1. iGaming can introduce or reintroduce people to the entertainment value of gaming, which
grows the number of overall participants in the Land-based gaming market. For example, the
AG State Gambling Survey asked a sample of 595 Illinois respondents about their gambling
behaviors and intentions, with 215 (or 36.1%) of these respondents completing the survey and
indicating that they had participated in a gambling activity of interest in the past 12 months
and/or would consider doing so in the next 12 months.14, 15 Of these 215 respondents, 76 (or
35.3%) indicated that they had engaged in Land-based gaming (excluding VGTs) in the past
12 months (See Figure 4), and 43 (or 20.0%) indicated that they had engaged in iGaming in
the past 12 months.16 From the 43 respondents that have engaged in iGaming in the past 12
months, 18 respondents (or 41.9%) also had not engaged in Land-based casino gaming in the
past 12 months, making them prospective new Land-based casino visitors. 17 From the 18
prospective visitors, 9 respondents (or 50.0%) said they would consider Land-based
casino gaming in the next 12 months.18
Additionally, 25 of the 43 iGaming respondents (or 58.1%) also had not used VGTs in the past
12 months, making them prospective new VGT users.19 From the 25 prospective users, 5
13
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54.
14
Gambling activities of interest are defined as betting or wagering on casino games at a casino, betting or wagering
on sports (excluding horse racing) at a casino’s sportsbook, betting or wagering on casino games using a licensed
online casino, betting or wagering on casino games using an unlicensed (“offshore”) casino (considering this in the
next 12 months not included), or betting or wagering on casino games using a VGT.
15
From the entire sample, 257 respondents indicated that they had participated in a gambling activity of interest in the
past 12 months or would consider doing so in the next 12 months, but 42 of these did not complete survey or were
removed from the final sample due to data quality. The questions used to determine participation in a gambling activity
are: AG State Gambling Survey, Question S6 (“In which of the following activities, if any, have you participated in
the past 12 months, either online or in person?”); AG State Gambling Survey, Question S7 (“In which of the following
activities, if any, would you consider participating in the next 12 months, either online or in person?”); AG State
Gambling Survey, Question S8 (“You indicated you have bet or wagered money on casino games, sports, or horse
racing in the past 12 months. Which of the following best describe your betting or wagering activity in the past 12
months?”); AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9 (“You indicated that you would consider betting or wagering
money on casino games, sports, or horse racing in the next 12 months. Assuming all of the options below are available
to you, which of the following activities would you consider doing in the next 12 months?”).
16
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S8.
17
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S8.
18
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9.
19
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S8.
respondents (or 20.0%) said they would consider using VGTs in the next 12 months.20 In
this way, iGaming can introduce consumers into Land-based casino gaming and/or VGTs, thus
growing the number of overall participants in these markets. Among the 112 respondents who
indicated that they had not engaged in any gambling activity of interest in the past 12 months
but would consider doing so in the next 12 months, 56 (or 50.0%) said that they would consider
engaging in iGaming, 72 (or 64.3%) said that they would consider betting or wagering at a
Land-based casino, and 15 (or 13.4%) said that they would consider betting or wagering
through VGTs.21
For consumers who are not yet in the gambling market but are considering it, iGaming can
provide a new entry channel into the overall gaming market. For instance, when asked about
which iGaming site they would use, one respondent said, “I would want one that is safe and
has a good reputation. Possibly casino based. Like BetMGM.”22 As another example, when
asked about the location where they would typically consider using a VGT, one respondent
said, “I don’t know any but if I came across one I would definitely go because I am already
familiar with the online betting gigs.”23 In this way, iGaming can introduce consumers into
Land-based casino gaming and/or VGTs, and vice versa, thus growing the number of overall
participants in the market.
20
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9.
21
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9.
22
AG State Gambling Survey, Question QF1 (“You mentioned that you would consider betting or wagering on casino
games using a licensed online casino in the next 12 months. We would like to ask you a few questions about a potential
session betting or wagering on licensed online casino games. If you know, which licensed online casino would you
use to bet or wager? Why that one?”), Record #9807 (Female, 64).
23
AG State Gambling Survey, Question QG1 (“You mentioned that you would consider betting or wagering on casino
games using an electronic gambling machine (e.g., a machine situated at a licensed establishment that is not a casino,
such as a bar, a restaurant, or a gas station) in the next 12 months. We would like to ask you a few questions about a
potential visit to an establishment with an electronic gambling machine. If you know, what establishment would you
visit? Why there?”), Record #9709 (Male, 21).
Number of
Respondents
Respondents asked
700 about gambling
Qualified respondents
who engaged in Land-
600 Based Casino gambling
in the past 12 months
0
Asked Gambling Qualified Qualified
Respondents (LBC) Respondents (VGT)
2. iGaming can expand the dollars and economic activity in the gaming market rather than
cannibalizing Land-based gaming. Among the 43 respondents who indicated that they had
engaged in iGaming in the past 12 months, 23.3% said that since they started iGaming, their
betting or wagering frequency at Land-based casinos has increased, compared with only 18.6%
saying that it has decreased.24 53.5% said that their betting frequency at Land-based casinos
has stayed the same since they started iGaming (See Figure 5). In terms of willingness to spend
for the 43 respondents who indicated that they had engaged in iGaming in the past 12 months,
23.3% reported that since they started iGaming, the total amount of money they play with at a
Land-based casino has increased, compared to only 16.3% who said that it has decreased.25
55.8% reported that it stayed the same (See Figure 6).
24
AG State Gambling Survey, Question B15 (“Since you started to bet or wager on online casino games, would you
say that your frequency of betting or wagering on casino games at a casino has increased, decreased, or stayed the
same?”).
25
AG State Gambling Survey, Question B16 (“Since you started to bet or wager on online casino games, would you
say that the total amount of money that you play with (i.e., the maximum amount of money you are willing to risk
across the entire visit) while betting or wagering on casino games at a casino has increased, decreased, or stayed the
same?”).
90%
80% 75.0%
70%
63.3%
60%
53.5%
50%
40%
30%
23.3%
20.0% 18.6%
20% 15.0%16.7%
10% 7.5%
0%
Increased Stayed the Same Decreased
Online Casino VGTs Sports Betting
3. iGaming and Land-based gaming are viewed by consumers as two different products with
different uses and benefits. For example, during AG’s consumer research interviews, some
interviewees suggested that visiting in-person casinos is a unique experience that cannot be
replicated by iGaming. A 59-year-old male interviewee from Illinois who said he would play
online casino games was asked whether he would still visit Land-based casinos if iGaming
became available. He replied, “Oh no I… I would still go in person. I mean, there's just, it's
just too much fun. […] Come on. It’s Vegas. You know. […] We look forward to it and we look
forward to the good weather. […]”26 Another Illinois interviewee, a 54-year-old female, stated
that she “would do online and in the casino,” that Land-based casinos are “a place to have fun
[and] entertain yourself,” and that visiting Land-based casinos are a “[s]pecial occasion type
thing […] like, you know, a night out type thing,” while she would play “mobile games because
I could like that in my pajamas and I [d]on’t have to put makeup on or [an]ything. So I think
it’d be […] much more casual.”27
In addition to the previous arguments for iGaming and Land-based casinos being complementary
services, the AG State Gambling Survey provides evidence of additional reasons why the new
revenues generated by iGaming are due to an overall market expansion effect, rather than potential
cannibalization of existing Land-based gaming revenues.
1. There is an entertainment value in the additional activities and amenities available at Land-
based casinos, which, for many users, cannot be replicated through the iGaming experience.
Consumers who visit Land-based casinos often participate in activities adjacent to gambling.
During AG’s consumer research interviews, a 54-year-old female interviewee from Illinois
mentioned that she enjoyed “cocktails” and “an environment where everyone’s doing the same
thing” as part of the Land-based casino experience.28 Overall, of the 76 Illinois respondents in
the AG State Gambling Survey who have visited a Land-based casino in the past 12 months,
67 (or 88.2%) indicated that they also typically participate in an activity other than gambling
while visiting a casino.29 For example, 53.9% of these 76 respondents indicated that they also
have a meal at a restaurant during their typical casino visit, and 47.4% indicated they also order
a drink at a bar (see Figure 7).30 Because of these differences, iGaming is in many ways a
different product that does not compete directly with Land-based gaming.
26
AG Consumer Research Interviews, December 4, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Male, 59).
27
AG Consumer Research Interviews, November 30, 2023, at 4:15 p.m. (Female, 54).
28
AG Consumer Research Interviews, November 30, 2023, at 4:15 p.m. (Female, 54).
29
AG State Gambling Survey, Question A20 (“Thinking again about your typical visit to a casino, what other types
of activities, if any, did you do on or around the premises of the casino?”).
30
AG State Gambling Survey, Question A20. Respondents could select more than one option for an activity; therefore,
the percentages do not add up to 100%. “Don’t know / Unsure” and “None of the above” were exclusive options and,
therefore, could not be selected in combination with any of the other options.
2. iGaming and VGTs are perceived differently by consumers. VGTs are associated with a
different type of experience, convenience, or entertainment value because of their location,
which, for some users, cannot be replicated through the iGaming experience. For some
consumers, VGTs are more comparable to Land-based casinos. Similar to Land-based casinos,
consumers who use VGTs often do so while also enjoying time at an establishment that
provides food, drinks, or a good atmosphere. Of the respondents who have used a VGT in the
past 12 months, over half of them (55.0%) stated that they use VGTs because they enjoy the
environment or because they were already regularly visiting establishments with those VGTs.31
For instance, when asked about the main reason why they would typically consider using a
VGT, one respondent said, “I go [to a local bar or grill] to grab a drink after work sometimes
and play the slot machines they have there,”32 while another mentioned that “[t]here’s a local
bar not far from my house. The location makes it appealing and they have good food.” 33
Another respondent said: “Checkpoint Charlie’s Bar because all my friends were there.”34
Additionally, some users use VGTs because they are conveniently located. For example, when
asked about the main reason why they would typically consider using a VGT, one respondent
said they visited a “gas station in Arcola. A friend lives in thi[s] [t]own and also likes to
gamble. It is their favorite place. I like to please the crowd.”35 Another said they went to a
“Mobil [gas station], [due to its] convenient location.” 36 Further, some consumers appear to
view VGTs and video-gaming style machines located in Land-based casinos as both being part
of the same category of gaming. For example, one respondent in the AG State Gambling
Survey mentioned Rivers Casino when asked about the most recent casino visited, and another
mentioned Rivers Casino as the most recent VGT they had visited.37
3. iGaming presents a large opportunity to bring in some currently “offshore” or “illegal” gaming,
which would generate revenues for casinos, increase employment opportunities, and create
additional government taxes from activity that was previously offshore or illegal. A report from
the American Gaming Association (“AGA”) estimated that as of 2021, total bets for illegal
iGaming and unregulated machines were $447.1 billion, and total potential gaming revenue
from illegal iGaming and unregulated machines was estimated to be $40.4 billion.38 As of
2021, Illinois’s share of the total U.S. Land-based gaming industry (including both Land-based
31
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D12 (“You might have already mentioned this, but why do you bet or
wager at an establishment with an electronic gambling machine?”).
32
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D2 (“Next, we would like to ask you a few questions about your most
recent visit to an establishment with an electronic gambling machine. What establishment did you visit? Why
there?”), Record #10908 (Female, 30).
33
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D2, Record #14890 (Male, 34).
34
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D2, Record #10937 (Male, 40).
35
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D2, Record #10974 (Female, 35).
36
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D2, Record #9941 (Male, 37).
37
AG State Gambling Survey, Question A4 (“Next, we would like to ask you a few questions about your most
recent visit to a casino. Where did you go? Why there?”), Respondent 11279 (Male, 32); AG State Gambling
Survey, Question D2, Record #9475 (Male, 26).
38
American Gaming Association, Sizing the Illegal and Unregulated Gaming Markets in the United States,
November 2022, at p. 1.
revenue and VGTs) was approximately 5.9%.39 Based on this ratio, the illegal gaming industry
in Illinois is estimated as $2.4 billion in 2021.40
Among the 9 Illinois respondents in the AG State Gambling Survey who indicated they
engaged in offshore gambling in the past 12 months, 2 respondents (22.2%) indicated they also
engaged in iGaming in the past 12 months.41 In terms of future intentions, among these 9
respondents, 5 respondents (or 55.6%) indicated that they would consider iGaming in the next
12 months.42
4. iGaming presents an opportunity to increase the Illinois gaming market specifically for state
residents who have an interest in gaming and currently travel out-of-state to visit Land-based
casinos. In the AG State Gambling Survey, 34 out of 76 (44.7%) respondents who visited
Land-based casinos (excluding VGTs) in the past 12 months indicated that they typically visit
casinos outside of Illinois.43 Out of these 34 respondents whose typical visit to a casino is
outside of the state, 14 respondents (or 41.2%) indicated that they would consider iGaming in
the next 12 months. 44 During AG’s consumer research interviews, a 59-year-old male
interviewee from Illinois said, “My wife and I […] live in Chicago and we head out to Vegas
a couple times a year, sometimes a little more.”45
5. iGaming presents a cross-marketing opportunity for companies that offer multiple products
across sports betting, Land-based casinos, and iGaming products, including FanDuel,
BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, and others. This has the potential to increase interest and
participation in casino games among people who bet on sports but do not yet participate in
casino gaming. AG’s consumer research interviews show that interviewees are interested in
playing online casino games through well-known brands that they may already use for sports
betting or Land-based casino visits. One interviewee who mentioned visiting MGM and
Caesars Land-based casinos said that if online casinos were available, they would look for “the
major brands that I’m familiar with, like Caesars, MGM, uh, you know, those are brands that
I[ t]rust.”46 In addition, on the supply side, the companies that offer multiple products across
sports betting, Land-based casinos, and iGaming products can market their Land-based
offerings through the iGaming platforms to increase awareness of Land-based casinos and
inspire new activity at the Land-based casinos.
39
Calculated as $3.7 billion for Land-based revenue in Illinois divided by $62.1 billion. ($3.66 billion / $62.1 billion
= 5.9%). Land-based revenue (excluding sports betting) is $62.1 billion in 2021 for all states with data when including
estimated tribal revenues.
40
Calculated as $40.4 billion x 5.9% = $2.4 billion.
41
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S8. Betting or wagering through an “offshore” casino was defined to
respondents as betting or wagering through an “unlicensed” casino.
42
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9.
43
AG State Gambling Survey, Question A15 (“Which of the following best describes the location of your typical
visit to a casino?”).
44
AG State Gambling Survey, Question S9.
45
AG Consumer Research Interviews, December 4, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Male, 59).
46
AG Consumer Research Interviews, December 4, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. (Male, 59).
6. iGaming presents an opportunity for some people who enjoy playing free casino-like games
online to play similar games for money, which would expand gaming revenues. Some players
have been playing casino-like games online in states where iGaming has not been legalized.
For example, in AG’s consumer research interviews, some interviewees indicated they play
similar games such as Solitaire Clash, and Bingo Cash. Among the 43 Illinois respondents who
indicated they have bet or wagered through licensed online casinos in the past 12 months, 8
respondents (or 18.6%) indicated that they have done so using Solitaire Clash or Bingo Cash.47
7. It is common for consumers to prefer to gamble through VGTs more frequently than through
iGaming or Land-based casinos. iGaming creates a potential opportunity to increase frequency
of gaming relative to Land-based casinos, while VGT usage remains highly popular yet is often
viewed similarly to Land-based casino usage. Of the 40 Illinois respondents in the AG State
Gambling Survey who indicated that they have used VGTs in the past 12 months, 31 (or 77.5%)
reported that they have visited at least once per month.48 By way of comparison, of the 76
Illinois respondents who indicated they have visited Land-based casinos in the past 12 months,
only 42 (or 55.3%) reported they have visited at least once per month.49 Respondents who
engaged in iGaming showed a greater frequency of use than those visiting Land-based casinos,
suggesting the potential of iGaming to provide more frequent gambling opportunities for
interested consumers. Among the 43 respondents who indicated they had engaged in iGaming
in the past 12 months, 28 (or 65.1%) said that they did so at least once per month.50
47
Solitaire Clash and Bingo Cash are considered skill-based gameplay and thus are not categorized as iGaming.
“Effortlessly play classic Klondike Solitaire and compete in Multiplayer Tournaments to win real cash and prizes!
Download now and use your skill to earn those dollar bills!” See “Solitaire Clash: Win Real Cash,” App Store,
available at https://apps.apple.com/us/app/solitaire-clash-win-real-cash/id1589643727; “Bingo Cash games offer an
exciting opportunity to win real money through skill-based gameplay. The process is user-friendly and
straightforward, catering to both beginners and seasoned players.” See “Bingo Cash FAQ’s,” Bingo Cash, available
at https://www.bingocash.com/faq. AG State Gambling Survey, Question FE (“You indicated you have bet or wagered
on casino games using a licensed online casino in the past 12 months. Which of the following apps or websites, if any,
have you used in the past?”).
48
AG State Gambling Survey, Question D1 (“To the best of your recollection, how many times have you bet or
wagered using an electronic gambling machine in the past week, month or year?”). Respondents indicated their
frequency through a drop-down list of integers from 1 to 20, as well as “More than 20,” to indicate the number of
times within a drop-down list of “week”, “month”, or “year” to indicate the time period. For example, a respondent
who wanted to indicate that they used VGTs 2 times a week would select “2” in the first drop-down list and “week”
in the second drop-down list.
All respondents who selected any option in the first drop-down list and either “week” or “month” in the second drop-
down list, or those who selected any integer equal to or greater than 12, including “More than 20,” and selected “year”
in the second drop-down list were classified as at least once per month. All respondents who selected any integer
greater than or equal to 4 and less than or equal to 11 in the first drop-down list and selected “year” in the second
drop-down list were classified as at least once every 1-3 months. Respondents who selected an integer greater than or
equal to 1 and less than or equal to 3 in the first drop-down list and “year” in the second drop-down list were classified
as 1-3 times per year.
49
AG State Gambling Survey, Question A3 (“To the best of your recollection, how many times have you visited a
casino for the purpose of betting or wagering in the past week, month, or year?”). Frequency was calculated following
the method described above for VGTs.
50
AG State Gambling Survey, Question B1 (“To the best of your recollection, how many times have you bet or
wagered using an online casino in the past week, month, or year?”). Frequency was calculated following the method
described above for VGTs.
The iGaming revenues are projected based on a model utilizing data on sports betting revenues. A
complete description of the model and the corresponding supporting tables can be found in the AG
iGaming Report (2024). 51 Based on the ratios observed in other states between sports betting
revenues and iGaming revenues, Illinois’ iGaming revenues are projected to be $1.3 billion in Year
1 of iGaming legalization (2025). They are projected to be $2.3 billion in Year 5 of iGaming
legalization (2029). Including iGaming (but before accounting for any new casinos in Illinois),
total gaming revenues are projected to grow from $5.8 billion in 2025 to $7.8 billion in 2029,52
based on the observed trends in the states that have already implemented iGaming.
Illinois is expected to have four new permanent casinos in the Chicago metro area, which would
lead to additional Land-based revenues. The new casinos are located in Chicago, Rockford, and
Waukegan, and are anticipated to be operational at full capacity between 2024 and 2026. Once
operational, they would be expected to lead to a substantial increase in casino revenues and tax
revenues for the state of Illinois.
While the opening dates are not finalized and subject to change, these four casinos are expected to
open between late 2024 and 2026. Currently, some operations are running temporary casinos,
which will remain operational until the transition to their permanent casinos is complete. Because
the goal of this analysis is to project total potential revenues for the state of Illinois, revenues are
projected using a top-down approach for all four casinos combined rather than for each casino
individually. While the casinos are scheduled to open at different times, their opening dates are
close, leading to a relatively simultaneous increase in revenues.
Revenue projections for the four new casinos in the Chicago metro area are projected based on the
estimated market potential for the Chicago metro area (i.e., a top-down approach). The revenues
for four new casinos in Chicago by Year 5 (i.e., 2029, giving the four new casinos approximately
five years to reach their market potential) are calculated as follows:
51
AG iGaming Report (2024), at pp. 138-142.
52
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54. $5.8 billion = $4.5 billion in Total Land-based Revenues + $1.3 billion in
iGaming. $7.8 billion = $5.5 billion in Total Land-based Revenues + $2.3 billion in iGaming.
53
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 61.
1. The market potential for the Chicago metro area is estimated by considering its current share
of a larger area – the entire states of both Illinois and Indiana combined. This is relevant for
two reasons. First, the Chicago metro area includes populations in both Illinois and Indiana.
Second, there are already several established casinos in Illinois and Indiana, both within the
Chicago metro area and throughout the two states outside the Chicago metro area. 54
Considering the combined figures for Illinois and Indiana as of 2022, the population across the
two states was approximately 19 million people and total combined casino revenues are $3.9
billion across about 27 commercial casinos. The Casino Revenue per Capita is calculated as
the total population divided by the total casino revenues across Illinois and Indiana, yielding a
value of $200.93. See Figure 9.
2. Considering the current distribution of the populations of the two states and percentage of
casino revenues generated by casinos within the Chicago metro area relative to those outside
the metro area, the casinos in Illinois within the Chicago metro area far underperform those in
other areas within the two states, especially those in Indiana within the Chicago metro area.
The Casino Revenue per Capita in the Illinois portion of the Chicago metro area is only
$135.83. By comparison, the Casino Revenue per Capita in the Indiana portion of the Chicago
metro area is $1,377.50. See Figure 9.
3. This large difference between the Illinois portion of the Chicago metro area (“Chicago metro
(IL)”) relative to the Indiana portion of the Chicago metro area indicates substantial potential
for growth in terms of Revenue per Capita in the Chicago metro (IL). The additional market
potential of the Chicago metro (IL) is calculated as the revenue in the area required for the
Chicago metro (IL) to reach the current average level of the entire region on Illinois and
Indiana. The additional Revenue per Capita in Chicago Metro Area in Illinois is $65.10,55
which is then multiplied by the population in Chicago metro area (IL) to get the market
potential for the four new casinos opening in Illinois. The Year 5 revenues for the four new
casinos are projected to be $568 million.56
54
There are eight casinos within the Chicago metro area that are located in Illinois: Bally’s Chicago, River’s Chicago,
Hollywood Casino Joliet, Hollywood Casino Aurora, Hard Rock Rockford, Grand Victoria Casino, Harrah’s Joliet,
and American Place.
There are four casinos within the Chicago metro area that are located within Indiana: Ameristar Casino, Horseshoe
Hammond, Hard Rock Casino Northern Indiana, and Blue Chip Casino.
55
Calculated as the $200.93 - $135.83.
56
If anything, this is a conservative assumption, for multiple reasons. First, if the additional revenue from Chicago
metro (IL) were to come from market expansion rather than cannibalization of existing Indiana revenues, this would
bring up the average within both states combined. Second, the ratios utilized are from 2022 revenue, while they are
applied to 2029 projections for the four new casinos. To the extent the revenues of other casinos in Illinois and Indiana
may grow from 2022 through 2029, would bring up the average from the entire region. The conservative projection is
used for this report to account for the potential of these new casinos gaining market share from other casinos in Illinois
and VGTs in Illinois, based on the scenario that all new casino revenues from these new casinos are not purely market
expanding.
Figure 9: Projected Market Potential for New Chicago Casinos in Year 5 (2029)57
Comparison of the Chicago Metro Area to other major metro areas. As a robustness check, a
second method is considered to estimate the market potential of the Chicago metro area, compared
to other comparable cities, as follows:
1. The casino revenues in four comparable metropolitan areas are collected: 58 Philadelphia,
Washington, D.C.,59 Detroit,60 and New York City.61 These four metro areas are comparable
to Chicago because all five cities have large populations, they are located in the Northern
and/or Eastern parts of the U.S., and they have similar population growth rates.62
2. The Casino Revenue per Capita in each of the metro areas is calculated as the casino revenues
in a metro area divided by the population of that metro area. These figures are all comparable
57
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 62.
58
To determine which casinos are located within the metro areas, the home state and the driving distance are both
used to filter casinos. Casinos that are in Pennsylvania and within one hour driving distance are considered in the
metropolitan area. For example, in Pennsylvania there are 17 casinos in 2023. But only (1) Parx Casino, (2) Harrah’s
Philadelphia, (3) Rivers Philadelphia, (4) Valey Forge, Live! Casino Philadelphia, and (5) Hollywood Casino
Morgantown are located in the Philadelphia metropolitan area.
59
Revenues for (1) MGM National Harbor and (2) Live! Casino & Hotel in 2023 are included in the casino revenues
in Washington, D.C. metro area.
60
Revenues for (1) MGM Grand Detroit, (2) Motorcity Casino, and (3) Greektown Casino in 2023 are included in
the casino revenues in Detroit metro area.
61
Revenues for the three new anticipated casinos opening in New York projected in Year 5 (2030), and Jake’s 58
casino located in Islandia, are included in the casino revenues in New York metro area. Jake’s 58’s revenue in 2030
is assumed to be constant as that in 2023.
62
Philadelphia has a compound annual growth rate of 0.0% from 2020 to 2022. Washington, D.C. has a compound
annual growth rate of 0.1% from 2020 to 2022. Detroit has a compound annual growth rate of -0.4% from 2020 to
2022. New York has a compound annual growth rate of -1.1% from 2020 to 2022. Chicago has a compound annual
growth rate of -0.8% from 2020 to 2022.
in magnitude: $227 per capita in Philadelphia, $242 per capita in Washington, D.C., $283 per
capita in Detroit, and $200 in New York City. The figures used for New York City are based
on the values projected by the AG iGaming Report (2024) after the opening of the three New
York City casinos under the assumption that they are operating at their full capacity, plus the
revenues in the Jake’s 58 casino. Notably, Detroit has the highest casino revenue per capita
among the cities considered. By contrast, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C., and New York are
all close to each other, and they are all close to Atlantic City, New Jersey.
3. The average value of the Casino Revenue per Capita across the four comparable cities is
calculated to be $238. This figure is applied to the projected population of the Chicago metro
area to estimate the entire casino market potential in Chicago in Year 5 (2029). The projected
entire casino market in Chicago in Year 5 is $2.1 billion.
4. The estimated $2.1 revenue projection using this metro areas method highlights the fact that
the market potential projections using the Indiana metro area as a comparison produces a
conservative estimate of the future revenues for the four new casinos. The predicted revenues
of the four new casinos using Indiana metro area as a comparison account for 27% of the
estimated total market potential in Chicago metro area using other comparable metro areas as
a comparison in Year 5. 63
5. To estimate year-by-year revenue projections for casinos in the first five years based on the
projected value in Year 5, the growth trajectory of the MGM National Harbor in Maryland is
utilized. The MGM National Harbor is comparable to the Chicago casino locations for multiple
reasons. First, MGM National Harbor is in a major metropolitan area in the Northern / Eastern
part of the United States (Washington, D.C. metro area), which is comparable to the Chicago
metropolitan area. Second, it opened at the end of 2016, which is a period relevant to making
five-year projections as of 2024 because it provides over five years of data from which to
project revenues for the next five years for Illinois Casinos. Third, MGM National Harbor’s
square footage is comparable to the average square footage of the four new casinos. The square
footage for MGM National Harbor is 147,000 while the average square footage across the four
new casinos is 143,000.64 MGM National Harbor’s Growth Path from Year 1 through Year 4
is modeled by dividing its revenues each year by its Year 5 revenues. 2020 is skipped because
of COVID-19.
63
Calculated as $567.8 million / $2.1 billion.
64
AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 137.
6. Casino revenues for Years 1 through 4 are projected following MGM National Harbor’s
Growth path. For Years 1 through 4, the Year 5 projected revenue is multiplied by the “MGM
National Harbor Share of Year 5 Revenue” figures.
The projected annual revenues are conservative given that Illinois has substantial room to grow
based on its relatively low Land-based casino revenue per adult in 2023 ($160) compared to other
states (New Jersey = $411, Pennsylvania = $358, Maryland = $432).65 Illinois VGT revenue per
adult ($277) partially explains this disparity, but the evidence in West Virginia ($380 casino
revenue per adult and $360 VGT revenue per adult) suggests that casinos and VGTs in Illinois can
both still expand.66 As another example, Louisiana has $810 in casino revenue per adult and $225
in VGT revenue per adult.67 The previous arguments are consistent with the AG State Gambling
Survey results, which indicate that although casinos and VGTs have some similarities, VGTs
generally offer additional gambling opportunities that grow the overall market beyond what other
non-VGT states can achieve.
65
AG iGaming Report (2024), at p. 137.
66
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 24A and Exhibit 104. $380 = ($1,010 million – $491 million) / 1,362,475;
$360 = $491 million / 1,362,475.
67
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 49A and Exhibit 104. $810 = $2,735 million / 3,375,534. $225 = $761
million / 3,375,534.
The total projected Land-based revenues including revenues from existing VGTs and casinos,
revenues from new permanent casinos, and iGaming revenues for Illinois are calculated to be $6.2
billion in Year 1 (2025), and they are projected to grow to $8.4 billion in Year 5 (2029).68 Figure
12 shows the shares of projected profits between Land-based revenues (including new casinos),
VGT revenues, and iGaming revenues, respectively.
Figure 12: Illinois–Revenue Projections (Including New Casinos, iGaming and VGTs)69
68
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54 and Exhibit 54A.
69
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 54A.
Market research and analysis indicates that the introduction of iGaming would create additional
jobs in iGaming operations.70 A casino operator indicated that iGaming operations have resulted
in 183 jobs in New Jersey and 182 jobs in Pennsylvania.” 71 Illinois’ population is similar to
Pennsylvania’s and higher than New Jersey’s, so this would imply Illinois’ iGaming operations
would be approximately 183 jobs or more for just one iGaming operator.
Market research also indicates that when operators launch live-dealer gaming as part of their
iGaming platforms, states realize substantial employment impacts, typically through third-party
providers. 72 As one example, as of November 2023 “Sweden-based Evolution AB currently
employs about 2,620 people – including 2,260 dealers – at five purpose-built live-dealer studios it
has developed and operates in Connecticut, Michigan, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.”73
Moreover, aside from dealers, such gaming studios also create jobs in card shuffling, card
inspection, equipment management, training, floor supervision, service support, surveillance,
physical security, human resources, recruitment, technical operations (video and sound
engineering), construction and maintenance (carpentry), facilities operations, office management,
team management, management, studio compliance, and scheduling, among other positions.74
Census data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”) support the notion that there are a
substantial number of new gambling jobs in iGaming states in the category that includes iGaming
operations, but not Land-based casinos. While the iGaming jobs data are included within a broader
category called “Other Gambling Industries,”75 these numbers have grown in the iGaming states
since iGaming was legalized. In New Jersey, there were 139 jobs in “Other Gambling Industries”
in the year prior to when iGaming was active. As of March 2023, there were about 1,929 jobs in
this category, an increase in 1,790 jobs. 76 In Pennsylvania, there were 564 jobs in “Other
Gambling Industries” in the year prior to when iGaming was active. As of March 2023, there were
70
“Market and Policy Analysis: Prospective Internet Casino Gaming in Indiana,” Spectrum Gaming Group (2023)
(“Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study”), at 41.
71
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 41.
72
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 41.
73
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 42.
74
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 42.
75
Other Gambling Industries corresponds to NAICS code 713290, which includes industries engaged in operating
gambling facilities (except casinos or casino hotels) or providing gambling services. Examples include betting
information services, card rooms, gambling control boards, online gambling sites, online sports betting sites, slot
machine concession operators, video gaming device concession operators, and more.
See https://www.census.gov/naics/?input=713290&year=2022&details=713290.
76
Exhibit 1 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
1,338 jobs in this category, an increase of 773 jobs. 77 Similarly, West Virginia showed an increase
of 98 new jobs and Michigan showed an increase of 112 new jobs after iGaming legalization.78
Illinois’ adult population is approximately 35.0% of the combined adult populations of New
Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Connecticut.79 Applying a 35.0% factor to the 2,620 people
employed by Evolution AB in those states results in an estimate of 445 jobs that could be employed
by a similar company in Illinois. In other words, based on the observed employment data from the
four iGaming states and Illinois’ population ratio relative to them, it is reasonable that iGaming
could generate approximately 917 jobs for a company like Evolution AB alone.
Many live dealer companies and operators are increasingly focusing on expanding into iGaming
markets to grow their live dealer services. For example, the live casino supplier OnAir
Entertainment has a strategy to launch studio in five regulated live casino states with more to come
pending legislation,”80 indicating the company’s strategy on building studios in iGaming markets
once it becomes legalized. Additionally, Light & Wonder, a large-scale American gambling
corporation, has also expanded into the live-dealing market, having acquired Authentic Gaming in
2021 to begin studio operations in Michigan.81 According to their website, the company “has
strong ambitions to further extend Authentic Gaming’s product offering across the U.S. Market.”82
To the extent live dealers are located in the state of Illinois, this could lead to substantial iGaming
jobs within the state. With an estimated 917 new jobs based on data from Evolution AB and 183
jobs from one iGaming operator alone, it is reasonable to expect at least 1,100 new jobs in the state
of Illinois due to iGaming as a conservative estimate.83
77
Exhibit 1 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
78
Exhibit 1 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
79
9,445,887 / (6,930,046 + 9,817,879 + 7,526,958 + 2,702,594) = 35.0%. See AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit
104.
80
https://igamingnext.com/news/onair-entertainment-us-rollout/ (accessed January 25, 2024).
81
https://igamingbusiness.com/casino/light-wonder-authentic-gaming/ (accessed January 25, 2024).
82
https://explore.lnw.com/newsroom/scientific-games-enters-live-casino-market-with-authentic-gaming-acquisition/
(accessed January 25, 2024).
83
917 + 183 = 1,100.
Importantly, the AGA and Oxford Economics has developed two versions of their economic report
– one with data from 2017 and the other with data from 2022. Using the timing of the two reports,
this study employs an approach motivated by the DiD technique to evaluate whether the
introduction of iGaming has been associated with a positive, negative, or neutral impact on jobs
supported by the Land-based casino industry in the iGaming states. The intuition behind this
methodology is that if the legalization of iGaming in a state has an impact on jobs, the employment
growth rates would be different in states that have legalized iGaming compared to those that have
not. To the extent the growth rates in iGaming states are higher than those in non-iGaming states,
this indicates that the presence of iGaming in a state can accelerate job growth, for example via an
overall increase in the total casino market. Observing the opposite, i.e., slower growth in iGaming
states compared to non-iGaming states could provide evidence that iGaming legalization
negatively impacts jobs supported by Land-based casinos.
To implement the approach motivated by DiD, this study divides states into a treatment and a
control group. In this specific setting, treatment is the legalization of iGaming, and the treatment
states are the states which have legalized iGaming. The control group consists of all states that have
84
“Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry,” American Gaming Association (2023); “Economic Impact of
the US Gaming Industry,” American Gaming Association (2018).
85
“Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry,” American Gaming Association (2023), at p. 3.
86
“Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry,” American Gaming Association (2023), at p. 19.
not legalized iGaming. The methodology then calculates the compound annual growth rate
(CAGR) of employment for both the treatment and control groups between the years 2017 and
2022.87 Figures 13 and 14 show the number of jobs supported by the Land-based casino industry
for the iGaming and the control states along with the CAGR calculated from the changes in the
number of jobs in 2017 and 2022 in each state.
Notably, all of the iGaming states experienced positive growth in jobs supported by the Land-based
casino industry between 2017 and 2022, with an average growth of 8.4% across all iGaming states,
and 9.4% across the states that legalized iGaming after 2017 (Pennsylvania, West Virginia,
Michigan, and Connecticut).
Figure 13: Number of Jobs Supported by the U.S. Gaming Industry For the iGaming States
in 2017 and 202288
87
States with a missing datapoint in 2017 were excluded from the control group.
88
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 3 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
Figure 14: Number of Jobs Supported by the U.S. Gaming Industry For All Other States in
2017 and 202289
Figure 15 shows the results of the analysis motivated by DiD. The difference in CAGR between
the treatment and control groups is called the “Treatment Effect.” Observing a positive “Treatment
Effect” is an indication that the legalization of iGaming is associated with an increase in the total
number of jobs supported by Land-based casinos, including direct, indirect, and induced jobs.
Within the iGaming States, the number of jobs supported by the Land-based casino industry
increased by 49.6% from 2017 to 2022—nearly two times larger than the growth rate for the control
group that includes Nevada. It is worth noting, however, that Nevada’s reduction in jobs supported
by Land-based casinos was abnormally low when compared with other states in the control group.
As a robustness check, Figure 15 presents a second calculation which excludes Nevada from the
control group. The results excluding Nevada still generate a positive but smaller “Treatment
Effect” where the iGaming states continue to outperform the control states in terms of Land-based
casino employment growth by 0.6%
89
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 3 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
Figure 15: Summary of Jobs Supported by the U.S. Gaming Industry by State Grouping in
2017 and 202290
As another robustness check, a second Treatment Effect is calculated removing New Jersey and
Delaware, to account for the fact that New Jersey and Delaware legalized iGaming in 2013 (before
2017, the first year of available data).91 This Treatment effect isolates only the states that legalized
iGaming between 2017 and 2022. The Treatment effect results for these states also suggests that
iGaming states have experienced a faster growth in jobs supported by the Land-based casino
industry relative to the control states, with a 5.4% higher annual job growth rate compared to All
Other States and a 1.6% higher job growth compared to All Other States, excluding Nevada. See
Figure 15.
Overall, these results present strong evidence indicating that the legalization of iGaming does not
have a negative impact on job growth, but rather it is associated with an improvement in the growth
rates of jobs supported by the Land-based casino industry.
iGaming has been associated with an increase in Land-based casino gross gaming revenues in the
six states where iGaming is active, with an average Land-based Treatment Effect of +1.9%.92 In
other words, on average, the states that have implemented iGaming have seen Land-based revenues
grow by 1.9% faster per year than they were trending before they implemented iGaming.
Additional gross gaming revenues are reasonably associated with additional activity at the casinos
in terms of more frequent visits from casino attendees, as well as new visitors who are drawn to
90
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 4 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
91
While New Jersey legalized iGaming in 2013, the iGaming revenues were small in New Jersey until they started
to grow substantially faster beginning around 2018. Therefore, even though New Jersey legalized iGaming in 2013,
its impact (if any) would have been more present beginning around 2018. While Delaware legalized iGaming in
2013, iGaming revenues in Delaware have not grown like in other states, and they only make up about 3% of total
casino revenues as of 2023. Both of these states are discussed in more detail in the AG iGaming Report (2024).
92
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 52.
Land-based casinos. The additional activity would reasonably lead to additional employees at the
Land-based casinos to service the new gaming activity. In addition, the additional activity would
reasonably lead to additional employees to service other activities related to the casinos, including
hotels, food & beverage, other entertainment, and transportation.
Market research and analysis indicate that the introduction of iGaming would lead to additional
jobs at Land-based casinos, or at least the number of existing jobs would not be negatively
impacted.93 For example, one casino operator has indicated that “iGaming has increased visits to
[their] casino, which “positively impacts” staffing levels.”94 One explanation for this phenomenon
is that iGaming operators “use marketing incentives to drive iGaming players to [the] casino,”
which results in both increased casino and marketing-related employment. 95 Indeed, a casino
operator that operates in multiple states indicated that iGaming not led to a reduction in casino
employment in the states in which it operates.96
D. VGT jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from 4,863 in 2023 to 6,785 in
2029 (a 40% increase). Land-based casino jobs in Illinois are projected to
increase from 5,462 in 2023 to 8,797 in 2029 (a 61% increase), driven primarily
by the four new casinos.
The projected increase in jobs associated with increased Land-based revenues, increased VGT
revenues, and the four new casinos is modeled as follows.
VGT jobs. VGT jobs in the state of Illinois are projected as follows. First, the ratio of total VGT
revenues to jobs (revenue per VGT employee), is calculated using state reported revenue figures
and census data for Illinois “Other Gambling Industries” jobs97 from 2023. This ratio of VGT
revenue per employee is then applied to the projected VGTs revenues from 2024 through 2029 to
estimate the growth in jobs due to additional anticipated VGT revenues throughout the state in
cities where they are currently legal. The results show that total jobs are projected to increase from
4,863 in 2023 to 6,785 in 2029 (a 40% increase).
93
“Market and Policy Analysis: Prospective Internet Casino Gaming in Indiana,” Spectrum Gaming Group (2023)
(“Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study”), at 41.
94
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 41.
95
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 41.
96
Spectrum Indiana 2023 Study, at 41.
97
For the purposes of this analysis, jobs under “Other Gambling Industries” are utilized for jobs coming from VGTs.
Among others, “video gaming device concession operators” is included in the “Other Gambling Industries” reported
in the census data. While there may be some other jobs not specific to VGTs in this sector, it is reasonable that VGTs
would make up the majority of jobs in this category, considering that the VGT market in Illinois is even larger than
the market for Land-based casino revenues. VGT revenue in Illinois in 2022 was $2.7 billion, and the number of VGTs
in Illinois in 2022 was 45,008. See AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 48A and Exhibit 94.
Casino jobs. For the four new casinos, first, the ratio of total casino revenues to jobs (revenue per
casino employee), using state reported revenue figures and census data for Illinois casino-related
jobs in 2023 is calculated. This ratio of casino revenue per employee is then applied to the projected
Land-based revenues associated with the four new casinos from 2024 through 2029 to estimate the
growth in jobs due to new casinos. The results show that total jobs are projected to increase from
5,462 in 2023 to 8,797 in 2029 (a 61% increase).
Figure 17: Projected New Casino Jobs Resulting From Four New Casinos: 2023-202999
Building on the analysis from a report issued by the AGA: “Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming
Industry” (“AGA 2023 Economic Report”), this analysis estimates the direct, indirect, and induced
impacts that the increased gaming revenues (largely attributable to the four new casinos) are
projected to have on jobs.100
The direct impact on new jobs includes additional jobs created that are a direct result of casinos
beyond the casino’s employees. It includes, for example, employees that provide products and
services to casino patrons during their casino trips, employees at off-site hotels and restaurants that
benefit from catalytic spending by casino patrons, employees associated with casino renovations,
as well as employees of gaming manufacturers.101 Because the employers are located in and around
Chicago, the majority of these jobs and economic benefits can be expected to occur in Chicago.
98
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 5 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
99
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 6 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
100
American Gaming Association, Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry, 2023, at 21.
101
American Gaming Association, Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry, 2023, at 2, 21.
From the AGA 2023 Economic Report, the ratio of direct jobs to commercial casino jobs across
the United States in 2022 is calculated to be 0.27. In other words, each additional casino job is
associated with an additional 0.27 jobs related to catalytic spending and capital investment.
This 0.27 ratio is applied to the projected VGT jobs for Illinois from 2024 through 2029 to generate
projections for the number of additional direct jobs over this period.102 The additional direct impact
of the VGTs in Illinois (including the additional impact of catalytic spending and sustained capital
investment over time) is that additional direct gaming jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from
1,302 in 2023 to 1,817 in 2029 (a 40% increase).
Figure 18: Projected Directed and Total Impact Jobs Resulting from Illinois VGT Jobs:
2023 – 2029103
This ratio is applied to the projected casino jobs for Illinois from 2024 through 2029 to generate
projections for the number of additional direct jobs over this period.104 The additional direct impact
of the new Land-based casinos in Illinois (including the additional impact of catalytic spending
and sustained capital investment over time) is that additional direct gaming jobs in Illinois are
projected to increase from 1,463 in 2023 to 2,356 in 2029 (a 61% increase).
102
In this context, the word “additional” means direct jobs beyond direct VGT employees.
103
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 7 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
104
In this context, the word “additional” means direct jobs beyond direct casino employees.
Figure 19: Projected Directed and Total Impact Jobs Resulting From Illinois Casino Jobs:
2023 – 2029105
The supply chain indirect impact on new jobs includes additional jobs created that are associated
with supply chain effects that follow on from direct impacts, for example, jobs associated with
purchases of goods and services required for the supply chain of casinos and other related
businesses of goods and services from other businesses.106 Because these casinos are based in and
around Chicago, the majority of these jobs can be expected to occur in and around Chicago.107
The consumer spending induced impact on new jobs includes the income effect and flow on to
household consumption, as casino employees spend a portion of their wages.108 Because these
casinos are based in Chicago, the majority of these jobs related to the consumer spending induced
impact can be expected to occur in and around Chicago.109
From the AGA 2023 Economic Report, the ratio of commercial casino jobs to additional indirect
and induced jobs across the United States in 2022 is calculated to be 1.75.110 In other words, each
additional casino job is associated with an additional 1.75 jobs related to the supply chain indirect
impact and consumer spending induced impact.
105
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 8 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.
106
American Gaming Association, Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry, 2023, at 2.
107
To the extent some of the services are provided by companies in other states, some of these jobs may appear in
other states. For example, to the extent the Illinois casinos purchase inputs and use service providers with employees
outside of Illinois, these jobs would benefit states and countries outside of Illinois as well.
108
American Gaming Association, Economic Impact of the U.S. Gaming Industry, 2023, at 21.
109
To the extent the casino employees live in and/or travel to other states, some of these jobs may benefit other states.
For example, to the extent a portion of the Illinois Casino employees live in other states, some of this effect would
benefit other states as well.
110
In this context, the word “additional” means indirect and induced jobs beyond direct employees of casinos and
VGT operators.
This ratio is applied to the projected casino jobs and VGT jobs for Illinois from 2024 through 2029
to generate projections for the additional indirect and induced jobs over this period. The indirect
and induced impacts of the new Land-based casino jobs in Illinois (including the impact of supply
chain and consumer spending) is that the number of additional indirect and induced jobs in Illinois
are projected to increase from 9,537 in 2023 to 15,361 in 2029 (a 61% increase), driven primarily
by the four new casinos. The indirect and induced impacts of the new VGT jobs in Illinois
(including the impact of supply chain and consumer spending) is that the number of additional
indirect and induced VGT jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from 8,492 in 2023 to 11,847
in 2029 (a 40% increase).
Adding the direct, indirect, and induced impacts together, the results are as follows:
For Land-based casinos, the number total impact jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from
16,462 in 2023 to 26,513 in 2029 (a 61% increase).
For VGTs, the number total impact jobs in Illinois are projected to increase from 14,657 in 2023
to 20,448 in 2029 (a 40% increase).
In general, the number of construction jobs required for large projects can be dependent on several
project specific details, including project timelines, labor costs as a share of total construction
expenses, and union status of the workers.
To provide a preliminary range of estimated figures, this analysis relied on publicly available
information on the four new casinos that will open in Illinois. News articles indicate that each of
the casinos, located under 90 minutes driving distance from the center of Chicago, are projected
to cost between $300 million and $1.7 billion. In turn, these projects are projected to generate
7,800 new construction jobs. These projections have the caveat that the budget estimates for the
Waukegan Casino are preliminary, and they may vary significantly along with the resulting
number of construction jobs.
111
AG iGaming Report (2024), Exhibit 9 in the Jobs Analysis Exhibit Deck.