IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs. Kimberly Altino Crasto
………Applicant
V/s
Mr. Moses Bababhai Chudesra & ors
……..Respondent
Index
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
SR. PARTICULARS PAGE
NO. NOS.
1. Exhibit A” is the copy of Marriage
Certificate
2. Exhibit “B” Colly are the copies of
notice dated 15th July, 2023 and reply
by Respondent through advocate
10/06/2023
3. Exhibit “C” is the copy of written
complaint dated 22/08/2023 to Goregaon
police station
4. Exhibit “D” is the copy of complaint
dated 26.08.2023 to the division office
of ACP Goregaon west
5 Exhibit “E” is the copy of written
complaint dated 30/08/2023 to zone XI
DCP
6 Affidavit under section 23 of
protection of women from domestic
violence Act 2005(43 of 2005)
7 Application for INTERIM RELIEF
U/S 23 of P.W.D.V.A 2005
8 List of Documents and Witnesses
9 Vakaltnama
6 Any other relevant documents
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs. Kimberly Altino Crasto
Age: 32 years, Occ: Service
Residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar Zopadpatti,
Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar,
Teen Dongri, Goregaon (West),
Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104
Jari Mari Cottage Room No: 7,
1st Floor, Murum khan Road
Marve road behind st anthonys
church malad west murum khan
peer bhai compound kedarmal
road ground floor, near new
sanjeevani hospital, Mumbai-400095
……… Applicant
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005
V/s
Mr. Moses Bababhai Chudesra
Age : 33 occupation: Business
. )…….Respondent
Mr. Bababhai Chudesra
61 occupation: Businessman
Mrs. Jaibunisa Chudesra
58 occupation: Homemaker
Mr. Muffis Bababhai Chudesra
38 Occupation: Business
Mr ,Moiz
36 Occupation
…..Respondents
APPLICATION UNDER SECTION
12, 18, 19, 20 and 23 OF THE
PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT,2005.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR:-
THE APPLICANT ABOVENAMED STATE AS UNDER -
The Applicant above named most respectfully states as under :-
1) The Applicant state the marriage between Applicant and
Respondent no 1 were solemnized on 09th April 2020
at Coast land Cottages, Anjuna, Goa as per Shariat law.
2) The Applicant state that Marriage was witnessed by
Mr.Gulam Smarat & Mr. Basir Moses, in presence of
local kazi who performed Nikah on 09th April 2020,
followed by grand reception also known as Walima.
“Exhibit A” Photo of Haldi Ceremony, Walima, and
Applicant and Respondent no 1 withattached.
3) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1 have
traditionally as per shariat Completed the Nikah
Ceremony on 09th April 2020 with pomp and fare in
presence of his office staff and respondent no 1 friends
and staff, as the cottage hotel named Coastland cottages
at Anjuna, Goa were owned by respondent no 1, .
4) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1 and Applicant
met in year 2019 through social media site after that
Respondent no 1 persuaded applicant to meet and discuss
business work post few meetings, Respondent no 1
expressed love towards Applicant also proposed to get
married to applicant, Respondent no 1 accepted love
proposal, and agreed to get married after which
Respondent no 1 and Applicant met frequently and
Respondent no 1 started forcing her for Physical
intimacy and to fulfill the purpose, Respondent no 1 took
Applicant to lodging and hotels in Mumbai and Goa
various location before marriage and had sexual
intercourse and forced her to watch porn and tried to do
unnatural sex which applicant objected, applicant states
that respondent no 1 had an addiction of drugs also forced
applicant to join him, to which applicant resisted+ and
refused, applicant
5) The Applicant state that Respondent no 1 have been
manipulative, had ulterior motives may be secretly, which
Applicant was unaware of, Applicant states that
Respondent no 1 have remained dishonest with him
during the courtship association, Applicant further states
that Respondent no 1 had been violent on many
occasion during courtship, despite Respondent no 1 had
previously evaded from the promise of marriage, after lot
of deliberation and pleading from Applicant Respondent
no 1 agreed for marriage.
6) The Applicant state that to her shock and studder on the
same date when Respondent no 1 got married that is on
02/05/2023 at evening Respondent no 1 left for Oman
without informing Applicant .
7) The Applicant states that woman cherishes all her life of
being a bride and enjoy the joyous day of marriage and
first night of the marriage, which Respondent no 1 cruelly
denied or deprived Applicant which is no less than a
crime and morally breakage of scared marriage vows.
8) The Applicant states since the day of marriage Respondent
no 1 have left Applicant at the mercy of her maternal
family, Respondent have not entertained Applicant
phone call, if Respondent no 1 do answer the Phone call
Respondent no 1 don’t take the note of Applicant plea,
albeit Respondent no 1 told her many times that he
doesn’t believe in court marriage and she can do
whatever she wants, which is again a denial of Husband/
9
marital duties towards his wife therefore it is evident
Respondent no 1 have miserably failed to honor marriage
vows and promises.
9) The Applicant states that when she tried to seek the intervention
of Respondent no 1 mother that is Respondent no 2, Mrs.
Tabassum Rafiq Shaikh, Respondent no 2 had abused,
intimated , ridiculed, humiliated Applicant over the phone
and threatned Applicant of dire consequences and used
words like “ DYAN” “CHUDAIL” and Further body
shamed her over the phone exclaiming “teri jaisi se mera
beta shaddi kar hi nahi sakta” “Tere pass kya hai dene ke
liye mere bete ko” also questioned her character, Applicant
states she was pained to hear that Respondent no 2 has
taunted stating “Tum log ne kuch diya nahi, hume toh badi
Umeed thi” meanwhile Respondent no 3 also Applicant’s
sister-in-law i.e. Mrs. Rahila noor mohammed khan have
been relentlessly used abusive and demeaning words which
10
cannot be stated here and threatened with dire consequences
and threatened for life.
10) The Applicant states that when she told Respondent no 1
about Respondent no 2 and Respondent no 3 behavior
on the phone albeit sympathizing with Applicant
situation, Respondent no 1 threatened her and asked
applicant to behave as per Islamic culture of abiding
elders, otherwise she will be punished as per shariat
prophecy i.e beating wife to bring her on right track also
Respondent no 1 threatened accompanying muslim
scholars from masjid and elderly from his home, at
Applicant house and society, Respondent no 1 &
Respondent no 2 also told her to arrange for deposit
amount and advance rent for their new home and all
furniture’s and fixtures of house and then talk to him about
cohabiting the marriage which evidently means that
Respondent no 1 and his family intention for dowry.
11) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1 have
11
manipulated her during courtship , deceived her with
promise to marriage and established sexual
relationship with Applicant, Applicant has paid hotel
bills for vacation in Goa and Alibaug and now
Respondent no 1 have abandoned her, insisting
Applicant to agree to his monetary needs .
12) The Applicant states she feels deceived, cheated as
Respondent no 1 had married Applicant because she
had secured a good job and was about to leave for
Australia and Respondent no 1 intention was to live a
king-size lavish lifestyle feeding on Applicant’s
money, however when Applicant changed her
mind and decided to settle in India Respondent no 1
attitude has changed considerably and all Respondents
have abandoned her since then at maternal home.
13) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1 have
multiple affairs with other girls which she has
evidences to be produced when as in during the
12
investigation in front of Hon’ble Court, Applicant
states Respondent no 1 is habitual womanizer and
want to live a life of Casanova and deceitfully bait
innocent girls and manipulate to get physical intimacy
and money, accompanied with promise of
marriage.
14) The Applicant states that through this marriage
Respondent no 1 have created nuisance and brought
bad name to her family and her in toto which has
maligned repute in strata of society.
15) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1 have
humiliated Applicant in front of her family members
and friends, Applicant states that Respondent no 1
cruel behavior towards Applicant has pained her
beyond the limit of her endurance.
16) The Applicant states that Respondent no 1
obnoxious /Errant/ Ruthless/ wicked/ unmannerly
behavior and recklessness towards dishonor of marriage
13
has caused gross/ conspicuous irreparable damage to
the consciouses of Applicant which gave Applicant
sleepless night also due to his unruly/adamant
behavior, which will have a long-lasting adverse
effect and lifted Applicant trust from pious institution
of marriage.
17) The Applicant states that she had seen great qualities
pre-marriage and admired Respondent no 1 of what
he portrayed towards her, therefore Applicant agreed
to Respondent no 1 love proposal but to her utter
disappointment / bad fortune eventually this marriage
seems to see no day light, as cohabitation of
marriage or any reconciling seems far from truth.
18) The Applicant states that she was panic-stricken
/horrified/ frightened/at aghast with the way
Respondent had treated her after she
chose to settle in India as if she had spoiled
Respondent no 1 master plan.
14
19) The Applicant states that it is Unbearably Distressing
to see how Respondent no 1 have used Applicant
trust and manipulated her as a bait to accomplish
Respondent no 1 ulterior motive which was to extract
money from Applicant above Rs.10 lakh and establish
sexual relationship.
20) The Applicant requested and pleaded Respondent no
1 with utmost humility through the legal notice from
her advocate, to honor the marriage Vows and
promise and reinstate her legal rights as wife
,Applicant politely desired her humble plea to fulfill
her marital privilege which Respondent blatantly
denied through his reply from his advocate on
10/06/2023. Hereto Applicant legal notice to
Respondent and reply to Applicant from
Respondent through his advocate Exhibit “B”
Colly
21) The Applicant submits that the Respondent no 1 had
15
with her full knowledge had given the false excuses
and pretext therefore the Respondent no 1 succeeded
to cheat the Applicant for his wrongful gain by
causing unlawful losses to the Applicant. Hence, it is
crystal clear that the Respondent no 1 deserves to be
prosecuted for committing the offence of the cheating
and criminal breach of trust and relevant section of
The protection of women from domestic violence act
2005
22) The Applicant state that on 22/08/2023 written a
complaint to, Goregaon West Police Station for
registering compliant against the all Respondents.
Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit “C” is the
copy of written complaint dated 22/08/2023.
23) The Applicant state that thereafter she approached
Divisional ACP of Goregaon Division on 26/08/2023,
Exhibit “D” further approached DCP ZONE XI
Borivali with same complaint on 30/08/2023, Exhibit
16
“E’ to act on her complaint and direct Goregaon
Police Station to lodge complaint against the
Respondents for cheating, demand of dowry, Sexual
Exploitation, beating, demand of dowry and
harassment of Applicant.
24) The Applicant states at one evening of __ august
2023 Respondent no 1 called Applicant to meet and
settle the matter at Inorbit mall at Malad west, wherein
Respondent threatened her for the life and asked her to
leave him and settle otherwise will face the dire
consequences and threatened for life, however
Applicant sensed some thing at miss and left the
meeting later Respondent no 1 pursued her back road
of malad west and assaulted her aggrieved by this
Applicant with her grandmother reached Goregaon
police station to narrate the incident however,
Goregaon police station cited jurisdiction issue due to
the offence beyond the jurisdiction and refused to
17
entertain the complaint.
25) The Applicant state that Applicant given written
complaint to ACP or DCP for registering the FIR
against the said Respondent but till date no any FIR
or crime register against the Respondent till the date
of filing this application. The Applicant states that
Goregaon police station official PSI Sakinal called her
at late nigh for statement multiple times, and promised
for action since then however no progress, Applicant
went to Goregaon police station many time however
police officials had paid no heed to Applicants plea.
26) The Applicant states that all the abovesaid offences
committed by the Respondent at the address of the
said marriage at Mumbai and offences occurred at
Goregaon west is within the territorial jurisdiction of
Goregaon Police Station Mumbai where the cause of
action of this case is arisen. Therefore, this Hon’ble
Court has got the ample jurisdiction to try, entertain
18
and dispose off the present Complaint.
27) The applicant states that Respondent no 1, has a good
name in export import business and often go to oman
and earns in foreign currency which estimates upto 5
lakha rupees per month, wherein applicant is working
at backoffice in private company and can barely
manage hand to mouth expense, applicant also has a
ailing old grandmother to take care off and is in huge
debt because she took loan for Respondent no 1 from
various private lenders.
28) The applicant states due to above said conduct of
respondent no 1 , she has suffered mental, physical
and fincail losses and setback, the applicant states its
Respondent no 1 duty to maintain applicant and
provide shelter, food, clothing, medication etc as per
his standard of living.
29) The applicant state that Respondent no 1 is liable to
mainatain her as per his income and standard of living
19
as applicant is legally wedded wife therefore
applicangt is entitled to claim maintenance for herself
and considering the current market and inflation , She
needs Rupees 1,00,000/- for food, clothing, and
separately rent of rupees 25,000/- and deposit of
Rupees 3,00,000/- for house.
The applicant states and prays that the Hon’ble court
may take cognizance of the complaint and pass all of the
orders deemed necessary in the circumstances of the case
and it is further prayed the Hon’ble court may pass the
following order :
1. Therefore it is prayed that:-
a. Protection orders under section 18, providing act of domestic
violence by granting and injuction against all the
Respondents from repeating any of the act against applicant.
b. Pass residence order u/s 19 the Respondent no 1 to pay rent
for the alternate accommodation or pay Rs 25,000/- monthly
and deposit of Rupees 3,00,000/-
c. Direct the respondent no 1 to pay monetary relief U/s 20 at
the rate of Rs 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) per month for
20
food, clothing, medicine, and other necessities for the
applicant.
d. Direct the respondent no to pay the compensation of Rupees
50,000,00/- (Rs. Fifty Lakhs Only) under section 22.
e. Pass such interim order as per prayer clause (a) (b) (c) (d).
f. Pass any orders as deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
It is therefore respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court be
pleased to grant the relief as above claimed therein and pass such
order as this Hon’ble court be pleased to grant the relief as above-
mentioned circumstances and facts.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS THE APPLICANT AS IN
DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
Advocate for the Applicant
Place
Date Applicant
21
VERIFICATION
I, Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar
Tanoli Age years, Occ: Residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar
Zopadpatti, Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar, Teen Dongri,
Goregaon (West), Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104, the Applicant, do
hereby state on solemn affirm and declare that whatever stated in
the foregoing paragraphs of this reply are true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and I believe the same to be true.
Solemnly affirmed at Mumbai )
This day of October, 2023 )
Identified by me,
APPLICANT
Before me,
Advocate for the Applicant
22
23
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli … Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …Respondent
Affidavit under section 23 of protection of
women from domestic violence Act 2005 (43
of 2005)
I, Mrs. Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh nee Ms.
Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli Age years, Occ: Residing
at Mahatma Phule Nagar Zopadpatti,Room no.60,
Opp Baudha Vihar, Teen Dongri, Goregaon (West),
Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104 Mobile Number.
_______________________________ do hereby state and
declare on solemn affirmation and declare on oath as
under:
1. That I am the applicant/complainant in the
accompanying application/complaint for protection,
maintenance and injunction for myself.
24
2. That being conversant with the facts and
circumstances of the case, I am competent to swear
the affidavit.
3. That at present I am living at above said
address.
4. That the details provided in the present
Application for the grant of relief under section 12
have been entered at my instructions.
5. That the contents of the application have been
read over and explained to me in Hindi.
6. That the contents of the said application may be
read as part of this Affidavit and are not repeated
herein for the sake of brevity.
7. That I apprehend repetition of the acts of
domestic violence by the Respondents against which
relief is sought in the accompanying application.
8. That the Respondent no 1 is not giving any
maintenance to me and my daughter, inspite of
having sufficient income and means and not allowing
the applicant/complainant to reside in matrimonial
home.
9. That the reliefs claimed in the accompanying
application are urgent in as much as the applicant
would face great financial hardship and would be
forced to live under threat of repetition/escalation of
acts of domestic violence complained of in the
accompanying application by the Respondent No.1 if
the said reliefs are not granted on an ex-parte
interim basis.
25
10. That the facts mentioned herein are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief and
nothing material has been concealed there from.
Advocate for the Applicant
26
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli … Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …Respondent
INTERIM APPLICATION OF
THE UNDER SECTION 23 OF
P.W.D.V.A OF 2005,
APPLICANT/COMPLAINANT
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR WORSHIP:
I the above named Applicant most respectfully
beg to state as under:
1. I have filed the above application u/s.12 of the
Protection of Women from Domestic Violence
Act, 2005 along with affidavit u/s. 23(2) of the
Act today i.e. on __________.
2. I have more particularly described the incidents
of Domestic Violence committed by the above
named Respondent in detail in my main
27
application u/s.12 of the Act. To avoid repetition
I pray this Hon'ble Court to kindly treat the
same as part and parcel of this application and I
crave leave of this Hon'ble court to refer to and
rely upon the same.
3. I further state that as narrated by me in my
main application, it is very clear that the
Respondents have subjected me to suffer
mental, physical, emotional and financial
cruelties since beginning itself.
4. The Respondents deprived me physically,
emotionally and financially. The Respondent has
not handed over to me and for maintenance of
my daughter a single rupee for my day to day
expenditures.
5. The Respondent after committing several
incidents of Domestic Violence have not allowed
me the privilege of marriage
6. Therefore there is an urgent need for an order
to protect me from the continuous ill treatment
given by the Respondent.
7. I further state that on account of the growing
needs, I require at least Rs.100,000/- per month
towards me and my food, clothes, medicines,
daily routine expenditures, shelter, education
and conveyance etc.
8. The Respondent who is my husband and who is
capable and duty bound to make provision for
28
me for accommodation and maintenance, has
willfully avoided to do so and has made my
life miserable with the help and support of his
family members. I also require an amount of
Rs.3,00,000/- as security deposit and a sum of
Rs.25,000/- per month as rent for getting an
accommodation on rent at Mumbai.
9. That following are urgent reliefs sought by me
during hearing of the application and
accordingly I pray:
a) It be declared that the Applicant has right
to reside in the shared household
b) The Respondent be ordered and directed
to restrict and prohibit themselves and be
restrained from committing any act of domestic
violence upon the Applicant, under the provision
of Section 18(a);
c) The Respondent be restrained from
dispossessing or throwing the Applicant out
from the alternate household
e) The Respondent be directed to arrange
same level of accommodation for the Applicant
as enjoyed by her in the shared household and
in alternate the Respondent be directed to pay
29
an amount of Rs.3,00,000/- as security deposit
and also to pay Rs.25,000/- per month as rent,
as provided u/s.19(f) of the act;
f) The Respondent be ordered and directed to
return all the jewelleries, article, things, and
belongings forming part of `Stridhan’ to the
Applicant as per the list, as provided u/s.19 (8)
of the act;
g) The Respondents be ordered and directed
to pay to the Applicant Rs.100,000/- per month
for maintenance and other necessities of the
Applicant/Complainant as provided under
section 20(d);
And for this act of kindness, I the above
named Applicant shall ever pray.
Advocate for Applicant Applicant
30
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli … Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …Respondent
MEMORANDUM OF THE ADDRESS : -
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli
Residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar Zopadpatti,
Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar,
Teen Dongri, Goregaon (West),
Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104
C/o. Adv. Narayan L. Mishra
Advocate for Applicant
310 D-Imperial Heights
31
BEST Colony, Opp.
Goregaon Fire Brigade,
Goregaon West,
Mumbai -400104
Advocate for the Applicant
32
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli … Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …Respondent
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
SR. PARTICULARS PAGE
NO. NOS.
5. Exhibit A” is the copy of Marriage
Certificate
6. Exhibit “B” Colly are the copies of
notice dated 15th July, 2023 and reply
by Respondent through advocate
10/06/2023
7. Exhibit “C” is the copy of written
complaint dated 22/08/2023 to Goregaon
police station
8. Exhibit “D” is the copy of complaint
dated 26.08.2023 to the division office
of ACP Goregaon west
5 Exhibit “E” is the copy of written
complaint dated 30/08/2023 to zone XI
DCP
6 Any other relevant documents
33
Advocate for the Applicant
34
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli … Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …Respondent
AFFIDAVIT-IN-SUPPORT OF COMPLIANT
I, Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh nee Ms. Rukhsar
Abubakar Tanoli Age years, Occ: Residing at Mahatma Phule
Nagar Zopadpatti, Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar, Teen Dongri,
Goregaon (West), Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104, the Applicant, do
hereby on solemn affirmation state & declare as under–
1. I say that I am fully conversant with the facts of the case & I
have filed this Complaint against the Respondent above
named for cheating and criminal breach of trust as prayed by
me in the Complaint. We crave leave to refer to & rely upon
the Complaint & proceedings for the purposes of this
affidavit.
35
2. I say that the facts of the case are stated in the Complaint in
detail & we adopt the Complaint as part of this affidavit in
support of the Complaint taken out by the Applicant, as if
the same is part & parcel of this affidavit.
Whatever stated is true and correct to the best of our
knowledge and belief.
Mumbai
Dated -
Advocate for the Applicant Applicant
36
VERIFICATION
I, Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar
Tanoli Age years, Occ: Residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar
Zopadpatti, Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar, Teen Dongri,
Goregaon (West), Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104, the Applicant, do
hereby state on solemn affirmation that whatever stated in above
paragraphs of the affidavit in support of notice of motion are true
& correct to the best of our knowledge & belief.
Solemnly affirmed at Mumbai )
On this ___ day of October, 2023 ) Applicant
Identified, Explained and
Interpreted by me
Before me,
Advocate for the Applicant
37
I am not a member of the Advocate Welfare Fund, therefore stamp
of Rs.2/- is not affixed herewith
Advocate
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli
Age years, Occ:
Residing at Mahatma Phule Nagar Zopadpatti,
Room no.60, Opp Baudha Vihar,
Teen Dongri, Goregaon (West),
Maharashtra,Mumbai-400104 . Applicant
V/s
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh,
S/o. Rafiq Shaikh
Residing at Room no-1,
Ahmed Khan House, Eksar Road,
Eksar Naitodi Gaonthan, Borivali West,
Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra
Mumbai-400092 & othrs …
Respondent
38
VAKALATNAMA
TO,
THE REGISTRAR,
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ANDHERI
MUMBAI.
I, the Applicants above named, do hereby appoint &
authorize Mr. Narayan L. Mishra Advocate, to appear, act, Plead,
for me/us in above matter.
In witness whereof I/We have set my hand to this writing.
Dated day of October, 2023
Witnesses
Accepted
Adv. Narayan L. Mishra
Advocate for Applicant Applicant
310 D-Imperial Heights
BEST Colony, Opp.
Goregaon Fire Brigade,
Goregaon West,
Mumbai -400104
39
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
COURT______BORIVALI, MUMBAI
C.C.NO. /D.V. /2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli
… Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, & othrs …
Respondent
COMPLAINT
Dated this ___ day of October, 2023
Adv. Narayan L. Mishra
Advocate for Applicant
310 D-Imperial Heights
BEST Colony, Opp.
Goregaon Fire Brigade,
Goregaon West,
Mumbai -400104
40
IN THE LEARNED METROPOLITAN
MAGISTRATE COURT AT BORIVALI ,
MUMBAI
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT NO.
OF 2023
Mrs Rukhsar Muzammil Shaikh
nee Ms. Rukhsar Abubakar Tanoli
… Applicants
Versus
Mr. Muzammil Rafiq Shaikh, …
Respondent
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
COMPLAINT
Dated this ___ day of October, 2023
Adv. Narayan L. Mishra
Advocate for Applicant
310 D-Imperial Heights
BEST Colony, Opp.
Goregaon Fire Brigade,
Goregaon West,
Mumbai -400104