“Jose Rizal University”
ANALYZING JOSE RIZAL UNIVERSITY’S ADVERTISING
STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS ON STUDENT ENROLLMENT
A Research Paper Submitted to the Faculty of College of Business and
Administration and Accountancy
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science
in Business Administration and Accountancy Major in Marketing
By:
Maria Alona M. Madelo
Christian Russel M. Ramos
Raiven L. Rimando
Robert Miguel D. Sagum
Joshua B. Villarba
Submitted to:
Dr. Juan Miguel Gonzalez
1
APPROVAL SHEET
The Researcher Paper Entitled: ANALYZING JOSE RIZAL
UNIVERSITY’S ADVERTISING STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS ON STUDENT
ENROLLMENT prepared and submitted by Maria Alona M. Madelo, Christian
Russel M. Ramos, Raiven L. Rimando, Robert Miguel D. Sagum, Joshua B.
Villarba In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of
Science in Business Administration – Major in Marketing has been examined and
recommended for acceptance and approval for Oral presentation.
Dr. JUAN MIGUEL L. GONZALES
Research advisor
Approved by the PANEL OF EXAMPLES on Final Defense on ___ (date of
defense) ______, with a grade of ______.
Dr. MILLER A. MERCADO, MBA, MPA
Panel Chair
Dr. JESSICA M. AVILA, MBA Dr. JOHN VEN SAINT L. PASAHOL
Panel member Panel member
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree
of Bachelor of Science in Business Administration- Major in Marketing.
___________________ _____________________
Dr. Honeylette DC.Villanueva Dr. Allan F. Galvez
Department Chair-Economics Dean –College of Business
Finance, and Marketing Administration and Accountancy
2
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY
We hereby declare that the thesis/ research entitled “ANALYZING JOSE
RIZAL UNIVERSITY’S ADVERTISING STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS ON
STUDENT” is our original work carried out as undergraduate students at Jose
Rizal University except to the extent that assistance from others in the thesis
/Research study / projects design and conception or style, presentation, and
linguistic expression are duly acknowledged.
All sources used for the thesis/research paper have been fully and properly cited.
It contains no material which to substantial extent has been accepted for the
award of any degree at JRU or any other educational institution, except where
the due acknowledgement is made in the thesis/research study.
___________________ ______________________
Maria Alona M. Madelo Christian Russel M. Ramos
___________________ ______________________
Raiven L. Rimando Robert Miguel D. Sagum
__________________
Joshua B. Villarba
3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To begin with, we’d like to thank the Almighty God for being there for us
since the beginning of our college journey. His knowledge , wisdom and strength
have been the driving forces behind our success and personal growth ,and he is
responsible for who we are today.
To our beloved parents,their unconditional love and encouragement have
enabled us to pursue our dreams with confidence. To our siblings who gave us
the moral support that we needed as well as to our family who have become a
part of our college life, are all greatly appreciated.
We also like to express our Special gratitude to our professor Research
Advisor and Thesis advisor,Dr.Juan Miguel L.Gonzales. whose
expertise,understanding and patience have substantially enriched our research
experience and to the respected panel members who are in the company of the
researchers in the new opportunity of discovering new trials in completing this
thesis.
Let us go forth in life, guided by the Almighty God, and always remember
that nothing is impossible if you believe in Him. And together , let us chase our
dreams with passion, courage and confidence.
4
ABSTRACT
TITLE : Analyzing Jose Rizal University’s Advertising
Strategy Effectiveness on Student Enrollment
RESEARCHER : Maria Alona M. Madelo
Christian Russel M. Ramos
Raiven L. Rimando
Robert Miguel D. Sagum
Joshua B. Villarba
DEGREE : Degree of Bachelor of Science in Business
Administration Major in Marketing
INSTITUTION : Jose Rizal University
YEAR : 2025
ADVISER : Dr. Juan Miguel L. Gonzales
This study analyzed the effectiveness of Jose Rizal University’s (JRU) advertising
strategy on its student enrollment. A survey was conducted to 344 randomly selected
first-year students in JRU to specifically: 1) describe their demographic profiles, 2)
explain their assessments of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy in terms
of the AIDA model; and 3) analyze the significant differences between their
demographic profiles and their AIDA assessments. Survey results were interpreted
quantitatively using descriptive statistics, while the significant differences between
the respondents’ grouped demographic profiles and their assessments were
analyzed using Chi-square test of independence and Mann-Whitney U Test. Results
showed that the respondents were mostly 19 to 22 years old, female, enrolled under
the College of Business Administration and Accountancy (BAA), and online media
were their main source of awareness about JRU. Meanwhile, statistical results were
5
interpreted as not significant, thus, retaining the null hypothesis. In conclusion, JRU’s
advertising strategy is effective as the students showed a positive attitude towards
JRU’s advertising strategy. The study also showed that it has a uniform effect among
the students due to its inclusive and broad appeal. However, this result also suggests
a potential need for a more tailored messaging to engage different audience
segments. It was recommended for JRU to have a more targeted messaging that
appeals to the students’ emotions while expanding its digital presence. Lastly,
reinforcing JRU’s competitive edge through strengthening its differentiation among
its competitors was also highly recommended.
6
TITLE PAGE …………………………………………………………… 1
APPROVAL SHEET…………………………………………………… 2
CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINALITY……………………………………. 3
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………5
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………….13
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ……………………………………14
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM …………………………………..15
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS …………………………………………..16
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES……………………………………………16
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY……………………………………..17
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY…………………………..17
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES……………..18
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK………………………………………..33
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK………………………………………..35
OPERATION AND DEFINITION OF TERMS………………………...36
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………39
RESEARCH DESIGN ………………………………………………39
POPULATION AND SAMPLE……………………………………..39
RESEARCH LOCALE………………………………………………41
METHODS……………………………………………………………41
INSTRUMENTS………………………………………………………42
STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF
DATA……………………………44
7
CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND
INTERPRETATION OF DATA………………………………………….48
CHAPTER V
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS………………………………………………72
CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………..75
RECOMMENDATION…………………………………………………..76
REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………….77
APPENDICES ……………………………………………………………..83
8
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1:TOTAL NUMBER OF FIRST YEAR STUDENT FROM JRU FOR
THE A.Y 2024-2025………………………………………………………..41
TABLE 2: FOUR-POINT LIKERT SCALE…………………………………………...44
TABLE 3:SCALE RELIABILITY STATISTIC………………………………………..45
TABLE 4:DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY AGE…………………………49
TABLE 5:DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY SEX…………………………50
TABLE 6:DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BY PROGRAM/COURSE……51
TABLE 7:SOURCES OF AWARENESS ABOUT JRU……………………………53
TABLE 8:RESPONDENTS LEVEL OF ATTENTION TOWARD ADVERTISED
SERVICES AND PRODUCT OF JRU…………………………………....55
TABLE 9:RESPONDENTS LEVEL OF INTEREST TOWARD ADVERTISED
SERVICE AND PRODUCT OF JRU……………………………………..58
TABLE 10: RESPONDENTS LEVEL OF DESIRE TOWARD ADVERTISED
SERVICE AND PRODUCT OF JRU………………………………………61
TABLE 11: RESPONDENTS LEVEL OF ACTION TOWARD ADVERTISED
SERVICE AND PRODUCT OF JRU……………………………………..63
TABLE 12:SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE RESPONDENTS ASSESSMENT
OF JRU,S ADVERTISING STRATEGY USING THE AIDA MODEL
WHEN GROUPED ACCORDING TO AGE………………………………66
TABLE 13:SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE RESPONDENTS ASSESSMENT
OF JRU,S ADVERTISING STRATEGY USING THE AIDA MODEL
WHEN GROUPED ACCORDING TO SEX……………………………….67
9
TABLE 14:SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE RESPONDENTS ASSESSMENT
OF JRU,S ADVERTISING STRATEGY USING THE AIDA MODEL
WHEN GROUPED ACCORDING TO PROGRAM/COURSE ENROLLED
IN……………………………………………………………………………..68
TABLE 15:SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE RESPONDENTS ASSESSMENT
OF JRU,S ADVERTISING STRATEGY USING THE AIDA MODEL
WHEN GROUPED ACCORDING TO SOURCE OF AWARENESS ABOUT
JRU…………………………………………………………………………..69
10
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1:AIDA MODEL……………………………………………………………29
FIGURE 2:ST. ELMO LEWIS FRAMEWORK MODEL………………………….35
FIGURE 3:THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING
JOSE RIZAL UNIVERSITY’S ADVERTISING STRATEGY EFFECTIVENESS
IN STUDENT ENROLLMENT (2025)...............................................................36
FIGURE 4:CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING
JOSE RIZAL UNIVERSITY’S ADVERTISING STRATEGY
EFFECTIVENESS IN STUDENT ENROLLMENT (2025).................................37
FIGURE 5:SLOVIN’S FORMULA………………………………………………...43
FIGURE 6:PERCENTAGE FORMULA…………………………………………..47
FIGURE 7: ARITHMETIC WEIGHTED MEAN FORMULA……………………47
FIGURE 8:CHI-SQUARE TEST OF INDEPENDENCE………………………..48
FIGURE 9:MANN-WHITNEY U TEST…………………………………………..49
11
T P
a a
b g
l e
e N
N o
o .
.
1
0
1
1
12
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
T P
a a
b g
l e
e N
N o
o .
.
13
7
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
14
CHAPTER 1
Introduction
The effectiveness of advertising strategies is a key factor in shaping
prospective students' perceptions and decisions when choosing a
university. As higher education becomes increasingly competitive,
universities must craft and implement marketing strategies that distinguish
them from others and attract a diverse pool of students. For Jose Rizal
University (JRU), this challenge was met when they launched their
rebranding campaign with the tagline “Find Your Inner Hero” and the
“Husay Rizal”. These initiative aims to inspire both students and faculty to
achieve excellence, resilience, and personal growth—values that are
embodied in the legacy of the university’s namesake, Dr. Jose Rizal (Jose
Rizal University, n.d.)
The Husay Rizal brand is built on four core principles—Talinong-
Rizal (Knowledge), Talentong-Rizal (Skill), Taos-Pusong-Rizal
(Compassion), and Tatag-Rizal (Resilience)—which challenge students
and faculty to become their best selves and contribute meaningfully to their
communities. JRU’s advertising strategies are designed to reflect these
values and demonstrate the university's commitment to shaping well-
rounded individuals prepared to make a positive impact on society. These
strategies are carried out through various promotional events, such as U-
Week, Frosh Night, the Husay Rizal Fest, PEP rally, NCAA sports events,
15
outreach programs, and job fairs, which serve as platforms for the university
to engage with prospective students, showcase campus life, and highlight
academic excellence.
Background of the Study
The Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the country is highly
competitive, with numerous universities offering a wide range of academic
programs and extracurricular activities. With this, it is essential for
universities to distinguish themselves through strong advertising strategies
that effectively communicate their unique strengths and attract prospective
students. JRU, a well-established educational institution, recognizes the
importance of advertising in order to remain competitive and relevant in the
rapidly changing educational landscape.
In the midst of the pandemic (2022), JRU President, Dr. Vicente K.
Fabella, introduced the university’s new tagline: “Find Your Inner Hero” as
part of his presidential address. According to Dr. Fabella, this tagline,
together with the already established “Husay Rizal”, will direct JRU’s brand
in the next 100 years. It reflects not only the excellence of the country’s
national hero and university's namesake, Dr. Jose Rizal, but the university
as well. It also challenges JRU’s faculty and students to become their “best
selves” or their “own heroes” (Jose Rizal University, n.d).
16
From the advertising standpoint, this rebranding initiative aims not
only to boost student enrollment, which took a dip during the pandemic, but
also to foster a sense of identity among the JRU community. Despite this,
JRU's enrollment figures were proven to be unpredictable. The total
population of first-year students enrolled in JRU for the Academic Year
(A.Y) 2020 to 2021 was 1,821. It increased to 2,360 the following year (A.Y.
2021 to 2022), reflecting a positive trend. However, JRU’s enrollment rate
took a slight dip compared to the year prior, with 2,181 first-year students
enrolled in A.Y. 2022 to 2023. In contrast, the most recent data showed a
resurgence, with 2,445 first-year students enrolled in A.Y. 2023-2024, and
finally, a slight increase to 2,479 for A.Y. 2024-2025.
Although mostly positive, these figures suggest an ongoing
fluctuation in student interest, which is crucial for the university to address
through effective marketing and advertising strategies. Essentially, JRU’s
advertising activities have the goal of increasing interest and awareness of
the university. However, based on the data on student enrolment, it’s
uncertain how well they influence prospective students and their decision-
making processes. Likewise, many studies have already explored the
effectiveness of advertising strategies in various local and international
HEIs, however, there is less focus on students’ interests, motivations, and
intentions that influence their decision-making. With the lack of in-depth
study about this subject matter, JRU management may tend to be blinded
and might be at risk of losing its prospective clientele. By filling this
17
knowledge gap, JRU’s student enrollment rate might be more consistent
and sustainable in the coming years
Consequently, analyzing the relationship between JRU’s
advertising strategy and its effect on prospective students may provide
insightful information that can guide the creation of the university’s
upcoming advertising and recruitment initiatives. Furthermore, the results of
this study may contribute additional knowledge in the field of Educational
Advertising in the context of HEIs in the Philippines.
Statement of the Problem
This study analyzed the effectiveness of Jose Rizal University
advertising strategy on student enrollment .
Specifically, the study investigated the following research questions:
1. What are the respondents’ demographic profile in terms of :
a. Age,
b. Sex;
c. Program/Course enrolled in; and
d. Sources of Awareness About JRU?
2. How do respondents assess the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising
strategy using AIDA model in terms of:
18
a. Attention,
b. Interest,
c. Desire, and
d. Action?
3. Is there a significant difference in the respondents’ assessment of the
effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the AIDA model when
grouped according to their demographic profile?
Research Hypothesis
Ho1 There is no statistically significant difference in the respondents’
assessment of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy, as measured
by the AIDA model, when grouped according to their demographic profile.
Research Objectives
This study specifically:
I. Assessed the effectiveness of JRU advertising strategy on student
enrollment.
II. Determined the significant relationship between the different stages of
the AIDA model and the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategies.
Significance of the Study
19
The findings of this study were valuable to the following groups:
Advertisers: This study showed which aspects of JRU’s advertisements
draw in students and have an impact on their choices.
Future Researchers: This study provided the foundation for future
investigations into educational advertising.
Marketing Students: The study offered insightful information about
consumer psychology, branding, and the efficacy of advertising.
University Administration: By applying the AIDA model, JRU can evaluate
how its ads influence student enrollment
Scope and Limitations of the Study
The study focused on analyzing the effectiveness of Jose Rizal
University’s advertising strategy on student enrollment. The study
specifically examined the impact of the advertising strategy on first-year
students enrolled in the 2024-2025 school year at the Mandaluyong City
campus.
20
Chapter 2
Review of Related Literature and Studies
This chapter contains a review of related literature, both local and foreign,
focusing on the effectiveness of advertising strategies on student
enrollment. It includes various materials like books, research journals and
manuscripts, and other sources of information.
Advertising
Advertising is a form of non-personal communication that is both paid for
and used to promote ideas, products, or services. The primary goal of
advertising is to inform and influence potential buyers by showcasing the
value or benefits of what’s being offered (AMA, 2006, as cited in Vangelov,
2023).
Jambhulkar and Siddiqui (2023) claim that advertisements are crucial for
both buyers and sellers, though they are particularly vital for sellers. In
today’s era of mass production, producers cannot effectively drive sales
without advertising. Advertising plays a significant role in supporting
personal selling efforts. Moreover, it can be a cost-effective means of
spreading messages, whether to strengthen brand loyalty or inform the
public. Thus, it has become increasingly important today, where intense
market competition and rapid technological advancements shape customer
preferences and trends.
21
Advertising aims to grab the audience’s attention and deliver a clear
message. Effective advertisements highlight key features, benefits, or
unique selling points of a product or service to interest or meet consumer
needs. To get the message across they combine text or spoken words with
visuals-- images, videos, or graphics. Advertising is a communication tool
between business and current and potential customers, to give information
about the company, its products, and where those products can be found
(Sharma, 2024).
Moreover, advertisements use storytelling, humor, emotional appeals,
celebrity endorsements, slogans, jingles and creative imagery to make their
ads more appealing to the masses. Essentially advertising’s main aim is to
grab attention and pique curiosity which ultimately leads to a purchase
decision (Jambhulkar & Siddiqui, 2023).
Role and Impact of Advertising on Education
The main purpose of advertising is to reach a large audience by spreading
information over long distances. Since advertising’s main objective is to
market and sell a product or service it has a big impact on sales volume.
This concept can also be applied in Educational Advertising.
According to Gibson (2024), the structure and effectiveness of marketing
affect student decision-making and institutional success. As colleges and
universities face changing demographics, rising costs, and changing
22
student expectations, understanding the role of marketing structure has
never been more important.
With these, the researchers compiled the following cases in various
educational institutions where the role and impact of advertising is evident.
Marketing Communication Strategy for New Students in Senior High
School in West Java, Indonesia
This study found that advertising activities are done in many places,
billboards, banners, radio and social media, specifically Instagram,
Facebook and Google. Sales promotions are tuition fee discounts, referral
programs and scholarships. Public Relations (PR) activities such as “Road
to Give Bandung 2023” are also part of the strategy. Most of their marketing
activities are done directly via email, WhatsApp and over the call.
Meanwhile face to face selling are done at Open Houses, mall exhibitions
and online consultations. Finally, Soponyono et al. (2024) suggested to
increase the school’s marketing strategy by maximize their advertising
budget, give big tuition discounts to students, use PR through charity,
promote WhatsApp and increase personnel for face to face selling without
disrupting class schedules.
Advertising Messages to Elementary School Students in Dublin,
Ireland
23
Student-focused advertising highlights the importance of Marketing
Communication for businesses offering a range of products and services.
The commercialization supported by digitalization has created a big gap
between the product and the ad. Students are bombarded with messages
that say the product will improve their lives and make them happier. This
leads to impulsive and rushed decision-making (Šević, et al, 2022).
This study also concluded that students should be able to: 1) differentiate
between ads and other forms of media content (e.g. regular TV shows or
internet content), 2) understand what marketers are trying to do to influence
their purchasing decisions and 3) know that marketing professionals use
advertising to shape their attitudes and desires.
Advertising Approaches on Student Recruitment and Enrollment
Advertising plays a big role in student recruitment, as HEIs now rely on
marketing to attract and retain students. The effectiveness of these
strategies will directly affect student enrollment and will shape the university
landscape globally (Funeka et al, 2022).
This section looks into the relationship between advertising strategies and
student enrollment, both traditional and digital.
Traditional Approach
Traditional advertising is about making money while meeting the needs of
the target market through offline channels. In simple terms it’s about fulfilling
24
consumer demands through established advertising methods that existed
before digital platforms. This approach uses the principles of advertising but
without digital channels. Traditional advertising encompasses many
techniques and strategies. Although digital marketing is the norm today,
traditional marketing is still relevant. Marketers still use media outlets like
TV, radio and newspapers to advertise their brands so it’s part of the
promotional mix (Kowshik et al, 2023).
According to Sikalumbi et al (2023) most public universities in Zambia used
the traditional approach in their advertising strategy to increase student
enrollment. The advertising strategies they used were ranked as follows:
Word of Mouth, Television (TV), Billboards, Newspaper/Fliers adverts;
Facebook adverts, Instagram, and Twitter. This shows that most of the
universities that participated in the study still value traditional media as their
primary source of information. Digital media ranked low on their decision-
making influencers making the Digital Approach ineffective in this region.
Promotional advertising strategies like offering scholarships and financial
incentives have also been proven to drive student enrollment. Lazanas and
Urbina (2023) found that financial aid and other incentives like tuition
discounts had a significant impact on enrollment outcomes in higher
education institutions in the Philippines. These strategies attract more
students especially those from lower-income background who otherwise
can’t afford higher education. This is in line with Willey’s (2023) study on
adult learners which found that financial aid and scholarships were the top
25
factors that influenced enrollment decisions, especially among non-
traditional students. Institutions that offer financial support will attract
students who would be deterred by the cost of education thus increasing
enrollment and retention rates.
Moreover, Murungi (2024) looked at the advertising strategies of Uganda
Christian University (UCU) and found that traditional media, radio and
television advertising, is still an effective way to reach both local and
international students. His study emphasized a comprehensive approach
that includes both digital and traditional media as each targets different
segments of the student population. Additionally, the study found that sports
programs and outdoor advertising increased visibility and therefore
increased student enrollment.
Digital Approach
Marketing in HEIs has become a hot topic as universities compete in a
competitive and changing market. In an era where digital tools and social
media has changed the marketing landscape, HEIs must come up with
innovative ways to increase visibility and appeal to a wide range of students
(Yoganandham, 2024).
Digital marketing is now part of the student recruitment mix. Labausa, et al.
(2023) looked into the impact of digital strategies such as university
26
webinars, social media campaigns and mobile friendly website on student
enrollment decisions. They found that these tools increase awareness of
university offerings and influence the decision making process. For
example, using webinar platform allowed universities to engage students
remotely, provide them with information and build interest in their programs.
This is the trend of using digital channels to reach a wider and more diverse
pool of potential students.
Additionally, Wijaya (2023) provides insight into how digital marketing
affects prospective students’ interest and decision-making, specifically at
Global University Jakarta (JGU). The research focuses on two main digital
marketing strategies: Google AdWords Advertising and Social Media
Marketing. These platforms are used in many industries because they can
target specific audiences and provide measurable results.
Zafar et al (2023) also provided additional perspective into the application
of marketing principles in Pakistani universities, emphasizing the
importance of segmentation, targeting, and communication strategies in
attracting prospective students. Their study points out the necessity of
utilizing digital marketing tools, such as search engine optimization (SEO)
and social media marketing, to enhance the visibility of universities and
increase student awareness. By targeting specific audience segments and
tailoring your message to really speak to them universities can build
stronger connections with the students who are most likely to enroll.
Effective marketing teams within institutions can help manage and evaluate
27
those efforts. That’s crucial for improving a university’s image and driving
enrollment growth.
In Zambia, Sikalumbi et al (2023) looked at how public universities market
themselves. What they found was that most were missing out on marketing
opportunities. But they did find some that worked: using university websites,
engaging with students on social media, developing programs that meet the
market’s needs and good customer service. This is the reason why
communication and a digital presence are in getting students interested in
a university and enrolling. They recommend for universities to be proactive
in adopting modern marketing strategies to stay competitive.
Integrated Approach
The traditional and digital advertising approaches were both proven to be
effective depending on the context where it was utilized. However,
researches on the topic have consistently shown that an integrated
marketing approach, using both digital and traditional advertising is key to
maximizing student enrollment outcomes (Yoganandham, 2024).
There are some HEIs that still use a combination of the traditional and digital
approaches in their student recruitment efforts. Neyney et al, (2023) argues
that traditional methods are still relevant in university recruitment despite
the emergence of the internet and digital media. Their study in Baguio
Central University (BCU) found out that while social media is a tool,
traditional outreach methods like flyers, campus visits and in-person events
28
are still important in attracting students. They concluded that universities
should balance digital efforts with traditional approaches especially in areas
where digital engagement is limited or less effective. They promoted a multi-
channel approach that combines digital and traditional media to reach a
wider audience and impact.
Theories and Models in Advertising
According to Creswell (2014), as cited in Leogrande (2025), theories and
models offer frameworks through which individuals understand their
experiences and make sense of the world. They create a framework of
ideas and perceptions from generalizations and principles (hypotheses that
reflect reality) to give insight into disconnected ideas. This knowledge helps
to clarify and organize scattered facts and make sense of them.
By looking at consumer psychology, behavior, and socio-demographic
factors, theories and models help us understand communication dynamics.
Overall, advertisements need to: 1) grab attention, 2) pique interest and
curiosity; 3) prompt action. The way to communicate these ideas can vary
depending on various factors such as: the situation, the target audience, the
type of organization, etc.. When all these concepts are present, an
advertisement is deemed successful (Ogah & Abutu, 2021).
AIDA Model in Advertising
29
American entrepreneur Elias St. Elmo Lewis developed the AIDA model in
the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Initially, his proposed model only
emphasized the concept of Attention, Interest, and Desire. Action was then
added much later on to represent the last stage at which a consumer is
inspired to buy something or perform the desired activity (Strong, 1925).
Figure 1. AIDA Model
Source: St. Lewis (1898)
As seen in Figure 1, AIDA stands for Awareness, Interest, Desire, and
Action. This concept outlines the various stages of consumer interaction
with an advertisement. St. Lewis (1898), as cited in Strong (1925) argues
that for an advertisement to be effective, it must first grab the audience's
attention, then pique their interest by providing pertinent information, then
evoke a strong desire by highlighting the advantages of the product, and
then encourage action, like buying the goods. This approach continues to
be a cornerstone of advertising and marketing, helping companies create
campaigns that sway customer choices. The AIDA model is widely used in
30
marketing and advertising management as it highlights the typical sequence
of steps that a consumer may experience when engaging with an
advertisement.
The Four Stages of the AIDA Model
Attention
The Attention stage in the AIDA model is key in the recruitment process as
it’s where you capture the attention of potential students in a crowded
market. This is the first chance to make an impact and therefore is crucial
to get them to engage more. Lazanas and Urbina (2023) shows that
effective marketing techniques including online ads and campus events not
only capture attention but also build familiarity and brand recognition with
potential students.
According to J. Robert III and Lange (2023), attracting attention to the
institution also requires fostering an open atmosphere that embraces
diversity and global viewpoints. This type of attention-grabbing advertising
goes beyond the surface level and is about creating a sense of belonging
and empowerment for prospective students.
Interest
Interest is the second stage in the AIDA model. It entails the early build-up
and, once established, sustaining interest. The goal of this stage is to turn
that initial curiosity into a more in-depth investigation of the university's
31
programs. Research by Harefa, et al. (2023) found that student interest can
be cultivated by aligning educational offerings with student goals.
Rosyiddin, et al (2023) also found that interactive and visually appealing
media such as engaging videos and dynamic online content can increase
student interest. Egara and Mosimege (2023) also mentioned that active
learning environment such as flipped classroom approach can be very
engaging for students.
While awareness advertising is important for introducing consumers to
brands and products, the study by Algaysi et al (2024) goes further by
highlighting the role of consumer attitudes as a bridge between awareness
and purchase intention. It says mere recognition is not enough. Brands
need to actively cultivate positive attitudes through their advertising
strategies. This is important for marketers as it shifts the focus from just
reaching and recalling to creating campaigns that resonate emotionally with
the audience and encourage positive perceptions. By factoring in elements
like brand image, product type and consumer values, awareness
campaigns can be crafted to build positive attitudes and ultimately drive
purchase intention.
Desire
The Desire stage is where interest turns into a strong emotional pull.
Research by Aranella, Girard and Connor (2024) on the psychology of
32
desire says that people are motivated to act when they see a direct
connection between their goals and the opportunities presented.
Russell (2023) also agrees, people are motivated by the fulfillment of their
desires which are often influenced by the outcome of their decisions.
Berridge (2023) also talks about the power of positive reinforcement in
decision making. In the context of student enrollment, showcasing the
success stories of alumni such as high employment rate or entrepreneurial
ventures will create desire to experience the same.
Advertisements drive purchase intention—and that's no secret. What's
more, they have a real impact on both how well-known a brand is and how
that brand is perceived. That awareness and image can actually help bridge
the gap between advertising and customer loyalty. For a product to succeed
in a crowded market, it needs to build strong brand awareness. And that
awareness, in turn, can drive more sales. Consumers are naturally drawn
to products with a well-established brand and a positive image. Those
factors shape the way they remember a brand. Brand image does influence
interest in visiting a brand but its effect on actually making a purchase is a
bit more subtle. Generally speaking, the more favorably a brand is seen, the
more likely customers are to come back to it (Rasimiko et al., 2022).
Action
Action is the final stage in the process where interest and desire turn into
actual action. That means prompting the customer to take action like buying
33
or spreading the word. When you advertise your brand, your ads need to
be persuasive enough to either get the consumer to act or pique their
curiosity about your brand.
When calls to action are woven naturally into the user experience, they can
drive higher engagement and conversion rates (Zhang, Ding, and Xu,
2024). Advertisements that create a sense of urgency or exclusivity can
prompt quicker decision-making (Mueller, 2023), as well.
Synthesis
The literature and studies compiled in this research provided the basis for
this study. Advertising plays a big role in enticing students to enroll in
universities. Both traditional and digital are important for recruitment. Digital
tools like social media, webinars, and mobile-friendly websites are key in
reaching and engaging students as it increases awareness and interest.
However, traditional methods like flyers and in-person events still matter
especially in areas with limited digital access. Hence, a well-rounded
advertising approach that blends digital and traditional media with
compelling content and guides students to the enrollment stage is key to
increasing student enrollment.
Advertising theories and models which provide theoretical frameworks for
message delivery can be useful tools in developing a business’s marketing
communication strategy. In advertising, theories and models help us
understand the dynamics of communication by looking into consumer
34
psychology, behavior and socio-demographic factors. Various models and
theories offer a different approach to advertising. These advertising theories
and models explain how and why advertising affects customer behavior and
achieves its objectives.
This study summarized various related literature and studies on the effect
of advertising to student’s decision making. The sources of the related
literature and studies came from different local and international schools,
colleges, universities and research-based private and public institutions.
These information allowed for deeper patterns to emerge and helped in
forming the research hypothesis. It also provided many approaches,
theories, and models to compare and determine what was best for this
study. It gave the researchers a better understanding of what worked and
what didn’t in the past. Meanwhile, the differences between the studies gave
the researchers flexibility to choose the best method to use in this study.
Furthermore, integrating similar approaches from existing literature helped
the researchers create a new and unique approach as a potential
contribution to the field of advertising.
Theoretical Framework
35
Figure 2. St. Lewis Framework Model
The four stages of consumer interaction with advertising are
described by the Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action (AIDA) model, which
was put forth by Elmo St. Lewis in 1898. St. Lewis argues that for an
advertisement to be effective, it must first grab the audience's attention,
then pique their interest by providing pertinent information, then evoke a
strong desire by highlighting the advantages of the product, and then
encourage action, like buying the goods. This approach continues to be a
cornerstone of advertising and marketing, helping companies create
campaigns that sway customer choices.
36
Figure 3: Analyzing Jose Rizal University’s Advertising Strategy
Effectiveness on Student Enrollment (2025)
The theoretical framework of this study is patterned on the
Conceptual Framework of Ojagh et al (2023) in their study, “Investigate
the Application of the AIDA Model in the Sport Industry: The Effectiveness
of Advertisements of Famous Athletes on Students' Attitudes”.
The primary theory/model used in this study is the AIDA model which
consists of four key stages: Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action. These
stages represent the process through which potential student engage with
JRU's advertising strategies. Attention captures their initial awareness of
the advertisement, while interest refers to the curiosity it generates. Desire
reflects the emotional connection or motivation to enroll, and Action
signifies the final decision to apply. These stages collectively influence the
effectiveness of JRU's advertising strategies on student enrollment,
37
ultimately shaping students’ perceptions and attitudes toward JRU's
advertisement.
Conceptual Framework
Figure 4: Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Jose Rizal University’s
Advertising Strategy Effectiveness on Student Enrollment (2025).
The Input-Process-Output (IPO) model was used in the conceptual
framework of this study to analyze the effectiveness of Jose Rizal
University’s advertising strategy on student enrollment. In line with the
objectives, the study described the Respondents’ Demographic Profile
profiles in terms of their age, sex, Program/Course they are enrolled in, and
38
where they learned about JRU. The study also explained their assessments
of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategies on student enrollment
using the four stages of the AIDA model (Input). The study’s Process
involved the gathering of the respondents’ Assessment of the effectiveness
of JRU’s advertising strategies on student enrollment through a survey.
Other survey results were also gathered, analyzed, and interpreted. Finally,
the study’s Output includes the interpreted results of the Assessment of the
effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategies on student enrollment and the
Respondents’ assessment on the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising
strategy using the AIDA model when grouped according to their
demographic profile.
Operational Definition of Terms
The following definitions will be utilized in this research:
Academic Programs: Refers to the degree courses and educational
offerings provided by Jose Rizal University, designed to meet the academic
needs of its students.
AIDA Model: Refers to a classic marketing model that outlines the stages
a consumer goes through in making a purchase decision.
Attention: The degree to which Jose Rizal University’s advertising captures
the attention of prospective students.
39
Interest: The degree to which Jose Rizal University’s advertising sparks
interest and curiosity among prospective students.
Desire: The degree to which Jose Rizal University’s advertising creates a
desire in prospective students to enroll at the university.
Action: The degree to which Jose Rizal University’s advertising motivates
prospective students to take action, such as visiting the campus, contacting
admissions, or submitting an application.
Demographic Profile: Refers to the information on the respondents’ Age,
Sex, Program/course enrolled in, and Sources of Awareness.
Effectiveness: Refers to the degree to which an advertising strategy
successfully achieves its intended goals, specifically gauged by the
increase in JRU’s student enrollment.
Educational Advertising: Refers to the use of advertising principles for the
promotion of JRU’s educational opportunities to prospective students.
Higher Education Institution (HEI): Refers to institutions that provide
tertiary education, such as universities and colleges.
Marketing Strategy: Refers to the overall approach employed to promote
the university’s offerings and attract prospective students.
40
Student Enrollment: Refers to the total number of students who officially
register for a course/ academic program in JRU.
School/University: Refers to Jose Rizal University, an institution of higher
education that offers various academic programs and student services.
41
CHAPTER 3
Methodology
This chapter outlines the methodology employed in the study,
providing a detailed explanation of the research design, population and
sample, research locale, method, instruments, and statistical treatment of
data.
Research Design
The researchers used a descriptive-inferential design using
quantitative data gathering to answer the questions for the research. The
quantitative approach in data gathering and investigations included a series
of questions. Information were assessed to draw the respondents’
assumptions about the topic, which were explained and correlated with
other data. The survey was conducted in the chosen school.
Population and Sample
Simple random sampling was deemed appropriate in this study because it
is “favorable in homogeneous and uniformly selected populations” (Noor &
Golzar, 2022). In this selection method, all the individuals have an equal
opportunity to participate in the study where the selection process is entirely
based on luck.
42
With this, a sample from the population consisting of all the enrolled
first-year students of JRU for the A.Y. 2024 to 2025 from the six Colleges
namely: College of Education, Arts & Sciences (EAS), College of Hospitality
& Tourism Management (HTM), College of Nursing & Health Sciences
(NHS), College of Business Administration and Accountancy (BAA),
College of Computer Studies and Engineering (CSE) and College of
Criminal Justice Education (CJE), were randomly selected as respondents
for this study.
Table 1. Total number of First-year students from JRU for the A.Y.
2024-2025.
Colleges Total Number of First-year
Students
College of Education, Arts & Sciences (EAS) 303
College of Hospitality & Tourism Management 449
(HTM)
College of Nursing & Health Sciences (NHS) 554
College of Business Administration and 569
Accountancy (BAA)
College of Computer Studies and Engineering 539
(CSE)
College of Criminal Justice Education (CJE) 72
Total 2479
As shown in Table 1, preliminary data collection from JRU’s
Registrar’s Office (RO) and the Management Information System (MIS)
under the Information Technology Office (ITO) revealed that there were
43
2,479 enrolled first-year students during the A.Y, 2024 to 2025. This served
as the population of the study.
From the population, a sample of 344 respondents were randomly
selected after employing the Slovin’s formula which was set at 5%
confidence level.
Figure 5: Slovin’s Formula
Source: Slovin (1960)
Research Locale
The respondents were first year college students enrolled in A.Y.
2024 to 2025 at Jose Rizal University located in Mandaluyong City.
Method
This study utilized a quantitative data gathering method. The
collected data were compiled, coded, and ‘analyzed using descriptive
statistics, such as frequency count, weighted mean, and standard deviation.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), a statistical software
was used to process the data and assist in interpreting the study's results.
Instruments
44
The primary research instrument for the study was a survey
questionnaire, designed to collect data and analyze the JRU’s advertising
strategy effectiveness on student enrollment’. The survey was divided into
two main parts: Part I (Respondents Profiles) and Part II (Respondents’
Assessments).
Part I collected the respondents’ demographic profiles while Part II
focused on measuring the respondents' perceptions and reactions to the
advertisements presented by JRU, focusing on various factors such as
attention, interest, desire, and action, based on the AIDA model of
advertising. This particular part of the survey questionnaire was loosely
adapted from the questions developed by Ojagh, et al (2023) in their study,
“Investigate the Application of the AIDA Model in the Sport Industry: The
Effectiveness of Advertisements of Famous Athletes on Students'
Attitudes”.
Finally, the respondents answered using a 4-point Likert scale as
shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Four-point Likert scale
Scoring Key Range Verbal Interpretation
4 4 Strongly Agree
45
3 3 - 3.99 Agree
2 2 - 2.99 Disagree
1 1.00 - 1.99 Strongly Disagree
Validation and Reliability Test of the Research Instrument
The validation and reliability testing of the research instrument were
conducted to ensure the accuracy, consistency, and credibility of the data
gathered. For the quantitative questionnaire, the process began with
content validation, where field experts assessed the relevance and
comprehensiveness of the items in relation to the study's objectives. This
step ensured that all critical dimensions of the research topic were
adequately represented. A pilot testing phase followed, involving 30
respondents, which allowed the researcher to identify any unclear or
ambiguous items and make necessary refinements. Most importantly, the
internal consistency of the instrument was statistically tested using
Cronbach’s alpha, which yielded a score of 0.984. This exceptionally high
value indicates that the items on the questionnaire are highly reliable and
consistently measure the intended constructs.
Table 3 .Scale Reliability Statistic
46
Statistical Treatment of Data
Once the data collection process was completed, the researcher
encoded the gathered responses into SPSS for analysis. Both descriptive
and inferential statistical methods were applied to interpret the data.
Descriptive statistics were utilized to summarize and describe the main
features of the respondents' profiles and assessments, while inferential
statistics were used to test relationships and differences among variables.
To address the first research question regarding the respondents’
demographic profile in terms of age, sex, program or course enrolled in, and
sources of awareness about JRU, frequency counts and percentage
distributions were used. These statistical tools effectively presented the
demographic breakdown of the respondents and provided insights into the
composition of the study population, supporting comparative analysis based
on these characteristics.
Frequency
Formula Percentage = 100
Total Number of Frequency
47
Figure 6: Percentage Formula
Source: Ott, R. L. and Longnecker, M. T. (2016)
To answer the second research question on how respondents
assess the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the AIDA
model—which includes Attention, Interest, Desire, and Action—mean
scores and standard deviations were computed. The mean scores helped
determine the overall effectiveness as perceived by the respondents for
each component of the model, while the standard deviation indicated the
variability or consistency of the responses across individuals.
Value of Item
Arithmetic Weighted Mean =
Weight of Item
s =
(x − x )2
n −1
Figure 7. Arithmetic Weighted Mean Formula
Source: Ott, R. L. and Longnecker, M. T. (2016)
To answer the third research question, which seeks to determine
whether there is a significant difference in the respondents’ assessment of
the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy when grouped according to
their demographic profile, inferential statistics were employed.
48
The Chi-Square Test of Independence was used for categorical
variables such as age, course/program enrolled in, and source of
awareness, to identify significant group differences.
Figure 8: Chi-Square Test of Independence
Source: Ott, R. L. and Longnecker, M. T. (2016)
The Mann-Whitney U Test, a non-parametric alternative to the
independent samples t-test, was applied for the sex variable, which involves
only two independent groups.
49
Figure 9.:Mann-Whitney U Test
Source: Ott, R. L. and Longnecker, M. T. (2016)
All statistical tests were interpreted at a 0.05 level of significance (α
= 0.05). A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 indicated a statistically
significant difference, while a p-value greater than 0.05 indicated no
significant difference, thus retaining the null hypothesis.
50
CHAPTER 4
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA
This chapter presents the data gathered as well as the interpretation and
analysis of the statistics supported by related literature and studies.
1. Respondents’ Demographic Profile
Table 4 . Distribution of Respondents by Age
Age Frequency Percentage
27 to 30 4 1.16
23 to 26 8 2.33
19 to 22 205 59.59
15 to 18 127 36.92
Total 344 100
Table 1 shows the age distribution of 344 respondents. The age
group with the highest number of participants was 19 to 22 years old, with
205 respondents, accounting for 59.59% of the total sample. This is
followed by the 15 to 18 years old group, which comprised 127 respondents
or 36.92% of the sample.
51
The remaining age brackets—23 to 26 and 27 to 30—had
significantly fewer respondents, with only 8 (2.33%) and 4 (1.16%),
respectively.
This data indicates that the vast majority of the respondents
(96.51%) were between the ages of 15 and 22, highlighting a predominantly
young demographic. Such a concentration suggests that the study's
findings, especially regarding perceptions and responses to JRU’s
advertising strategies, are largely influenced by the views of younger
individuals, likely high school and college students.
This data provide an excellent opportunity to explore how young
consumers assess advertisements and make purchasing decisions. In a
related study, Mecredy & Stocchi (2025) explores the differences in
cognitive evaluative measure of consumer buying behaviors and
advertising’s effectiveness across age groups.
Table 5. Distribution of Respondents by Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage
Female 228 66.28
Male 116 33.72
Total 344 100
Table 5 presents the distribution of respondents based on their sex.
Out of a total of 344 respondents, 228 (66.28%) were female, while 116
52
(33.72%) were male. This indicates that female respondents comprised a
significant majority of the sample population.
The higher proportion of female participants suggests that the data
collected, particularly in terms of perceptions and responses to JRU’s
advertising strategies, may be more reflective of female perspectives and
experiences.
Similarly, Willey (2023) found that gender-based differences also
play a role in advertising effectiveness. Female learners were found to be
more likely to be satisfied with marketing efforts than their male
counterparts, indicating that universities may need to employ gender-
sensitive strategies to appeal to different groups effectively. This finding
suggests that universities should customize their advertising strategies to
cater to the specific needs, preferences, and expectations of different
student demographics,
Table 6 . Distribution of Respondents by Program/Course
Program/Course Frequency Percentage
College of Education, Arts & Sciences (EAS) 8 2.33
College of Hospitality & Tourism Management (HTM) 39 11.34
College of Nursing & Health Sciences (NHS) 76 22.09
College of Business Administration and Accountancy
(BAA) 108 31.40
College of Computer Studies and Engineering (CSE) 44 12.79
College of Criminal Justice Education (CJE) 69 20.06
53
Total 344 100
Table 6 shows the distribution of the 344 respondents according to
their academic programs at JRU. The College of Business Administration
and Accountancy (BAA) had the highest representation, with 108
respondents (31.40%), indicating that nearly one-third of the sample came
from this academic unit. This was followed by the College of Nursing and
Health Sciences (NHS) with 76 respondents (22.09%), and the College of
Criminal Justice Education (CJE) with 69 respondents (20.06%).
The College of Computer Studies and Engineering (CSE) accounted
for 44 respondents (12.79%), while Hospitality and Tourism Management
(HTM) contributed 39 respondents (11.34%). The least represented group
was the College of Education, Arts & Sciences (EAS) with only 8
respondents (2.33%).
These figures indicate a diverse distribution of participants across
colleges, although there is a noticeable concentration in business-related
and health sciences programs.
Table 7 . Sources of Awareness About JRU
Where did you learned about JRU Frequency Percentage
Traditional media (TV, radio, newspaper) 4 1.16
Online media (social media, websites, etc.) 197 57.27
Word of mouth (family, friends, teachers, etc.) 131 38.08
Others 12 3.49
54
Total 344 100
Table 7 presents the distribution of respondents based on how they
initially learned about JRU. The majority of respondents, 197 out of 344
(57.27%), reported that they became aware of JRU through online media,
such as social media platforms, websites, and other digital channels. This
highlights the dominant role of digital platforms in shaping student
awareness and outreach in today’s educational landscape.
To illustrate, Siminto et al. (2024) emphasized the role of online
media, particularly social media, in student recruitment. Similarly, a strong
positive relationship between the implementation of social media
marketing strategies and increased student enrollment emerged in this
study. They also highlighted that role of educational institutions claiming
that consistently engaging with students on platforms like Facebook,
Instagram, and Twitter, and offer relevant educational content, leads to
notable rise in prospective student interest. Moreover, engaging in digital
campaigns, consistent content updates, and active interactions were
identified as key factors in enhancing student engagement, which in turn
positively influenced enrollment.
The second most common source of awareness was word of mouth,
with 131 respondents (38.08%) indicating that they learned about JRU
through family, friends, or teachers. This suggests that personal
55
recommendations and community-based communication remain significant
influencers in students’ decision-making processes.
Sikalumbi et al (2023) argued that most public universities in Zambia
adopted the traditional approach in their advertising strategy to increase
student enrollment. It was revealed that “Word of Mouth” remains the
primary information source among most of the universities that participated
in the study. Conversely, digital media rank low on their adopted decision-
making influencers making the digital advertising ineffective in this region.
Only four respondents (1.16%) cited traditional media (TV, radio,
newspaper) as their source of awareness, indicating a minimal impact of
conventional advertising channels in the current context. Meanwhile, 12
respondents (3.49%) selected “Others” as their source, which may include
school visits, public events, or printed materials not covered in the primary
categories.
Despite the dominance of digital and online media, traditional
advertising remains highly significant. Marketers continue to rely on media
outlets like TV, radio, and newspapers to advertise their brands, making it
an essential component of the promotional mix (Kowshik et al, 2023). In line
with this, Murungi (2024) explored the advertising strategies of Uganda
Christian University (UCU) and revealed that traditional media, including
radio and television advertising, remains an effective tool for reaching both
local and international students. This study emphasized the importance of
56
a comprehensive approach that includes both digital and traditional media,
as each serves different segments of the student population. In addition, the
research found that sports programs and outdoor advertising helped
increase visibility, contributing to higher enrollment.
Overall, these results underscore the importance of maintaining a
strong digital presence and leveraging peer networks in promotional
strategies, as they are the most effective in reaching and influencing
prospective students.
2. Respondents assessment on the effectiveness of JRU’s
advertising strategy using AIDA model
Table 8 . Respondents’ Level of Attention Toward Advertised
Services and Products of JRU
Std.
ATTENTION 4 3 2 1 WM V.I.
Dev.
I am familiar with the services and
3.30
products advertised by JRU. 64 68 164 48 0.95 Agree
I often see the services and products
3.36
advertised by JRU. 66 89 129 60 0.99 Agree
I have been informed by others about
the services and products promoted by 3.30
62 85 135 62 0.98 Agree
JRU.
I have seen the services and products
advertised by JRU through media 3.40
Agree
platforms. 79 81 117 67 1.05
The services and products advertised
3.38
by JRU have attracted my attention. 68 87 132 57 0.99 Agree
57
The services and products advertised
by JRU are attractive and meet my 3.34
Agree
expectations. 69 74 146 55 0.99
The services and products advertised
by JRU provide me with up-to-date 3.35
73 72 140 59 1.01 Agree
information.
Categorical Mean/Verbal Interpretation 3.35 0.99 Agre
e
Legend: WM – Weighted Mean, V.I. – Verbal Interpretation, Std. Dev. – Standard Deviation; 1.00 to 1.49 – Strong Disagree (SD);
1.50 to 2.49 – Disagree (D); 2.50 to 3.49 – Agree (A); 3.50 to 4.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
Table 8 presents the respondents’ level of attention toward the
services and products advertised by JRU. The results reveal a categorical
weighted mean (WM) of 3.35 and a standard deviation (SD) of 0.99,
indicating that, on average, respondents agree that the advertisements
effectively capture their attention.
Among all items, the statement “I have seen the services and
products advertised by JRU through media platforms” received the highest
mean score (WM = 3.40) with a standard deviation of 1.05. This suggests
that media exposure is a particularly effective channel in reaching potential
students, although the relatively higher SD points to variability in how
consistently different respondents encountered these advertisements.
The item “The services and products advertised by JRU have
attracted my attention” followed closely (WM = 3.38, SD = 0.99), indicating
that the design and delivery of JRU’s promotional materials are generally
effective in drawing interest and engaging the audience. Similarly, “I often
see the services and products advertised by JRU” recorded a WM of 3.36
58
and SD of 0.99, reflecting consistent visibility of the university's
advertisements across various platforms.
Respondents also expressed agreement that the advertisements are
both attractive and aligned with their expectations (WM = 3.34, SD = 0.99)
and that they provide up-to-date information (WM = 3.35, SD = 1.01). These
findings affirm that the content and presentation of JRU's promotions are
timely and appropriately targeted, maintaining audience relevance.
The statement “I am familiar with the services and products
advertised by JRU” (WM = 3.30, SD = 0.95) indicates a good baseline of
awareness, though slightly lower compared to other items. Meanwhile, “I
have been informed by others about the services and products promoted
by JRU” also received a WM of 3.30 (SD = 0.98), highlighting the role of
peer communication as a channel for awareness, albeit with slightly less
impact than direct media exposure.
The standard deviations across all items range from 0.95 to 1.05,
suggesting moderate variability in individual responses, likely influenced by
differences in personal exposure, media consumption habits, or
engagement with peer discussions.
Overall, the findings confirm that JRU’s advertising strategies are
effective in capturing attention, particularly through digital and traditional
media. However, there is potential to enhance familiarity and peer-level
59
dissemination, which could further reinforce recognition and recall of the
university’s offerings.
This stage in the AIDA model is critical in the recruitment process.
According to Sharipova (2024), attention is the gateway to perception,
memory, and comprehension. without focused attention, even the most
carefully designed curriculum or innovative teaching methods can fail to
engage students effectively.
Table 9 . Respondents’ Level of Interest Toward Advertised Services
and Products of JRU
W Std.
INTEREST 4 3 2 1 V.I.
M Dev.
The services and products advertised by JRU have
3.27
increased my interest in the university. 66 74 138 66 1.01 Agree
The advertisements have made me more aware of
3.37
JRU’s existence. 79 76 120 69 1.06 Agree
The advertisements have made me more interested in
3.28
learning about the university. 66 76 135 67 1.01 Agree
I am interested in promoting the services and
3.34
products offered by JRU. 65 86 134 59 0.99 Agree
I have discussed the services and products advertised
3.34
by JRU with others. 65 88 129 62 0.99 Agree
The advertisements by JRU are consistent with the
3.38
actual facts and offerings. 83 70 122 69 1.07 Agree
Categorical Mean/Verbal Interpretation 3.33 1.02 Agree
Legend: WM – Weighted Mean, V.I. – Verbal Interpretation, Std. Dev. – Standard Deviation; 1.00 to 1.49 – Strong Disagree (SD); 1.50
to 2.49 – Disagree (D); 2.50 to 3.49 – Agree (A); 3.50 to 4.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
60
Table 9 presents the respondents’ perceptions under the Interest
dimension regarding the advertisements of services and products by JRU.
The overall categorical weighted mean (WM) of 3.33 and a standard
deviation (SD) of 1.02 indicate that respondents generally agree that the
advertisements effectively generate interest in the university and its
offerings.
The highest-rated statement, “The advertisements by JRU are
consistent with the actual facts and offerings”, received a WM of 3.38 and
the highest SD of 1.07 among the items in this dimension. This result
reflects that respondents find the promotional content credible and aligned
with real experiences, although responses varied, possibly due to differing
levels of exposure or personal verification of the advertised claims.
The item “The advertisements have made me more aware of JRU’s
existence” garnered a WM of 3.37 and SD of 1.06, suggesting that the
marketing materials are effective in enhancing institutional visibility, even if
some respondents were less exposed or previously unaware.
Both “I am interested in promoting the services and products offered
by JRU” and “I have discussed the services and products advertised by JRU
with others” obtained a WM of 3.34 and a shared SD of 0.99. These figures
imply a solid level of engagement and willingness among respondents to
participate in word-of-mouth promotion, with relatively consistent views
across the sample.
61
Meanwhile, “The advertisements have made me more interested in
learning about the university” recorded a WM of 3.28 and an SD of 1.01,
and “The services and products advertised by JRU have increased my
interest in the university” slightly lower with a WM of 3.27 and SD of 1.01.
These results, while still falling under “Agree,” suggest that the depth of
interest generated by the advertisements may not be as strong as their
effectiveness in raising general awareness. The identical standard
deviations indicate similar levels of variation in perception for both items.
Collectively, these results show that the advertisements are
effectively stimulating interest, with particular strength in raising awareness
and maintaining message consistency. However, further enhancements in
content appeal and emotional engagement may help to deepen prospective
students’ curiosity and personal connection to the university’s brand.
The Interest stage is about converting the initial curiosity into a more
profound engagement with the university offerings. Egara and Mesimege
(2023) claimed that active learning environments, such as engaging
students, are necessary to sustain their interest. Therefore, JRU could
utilize new interactive advertising techniques as part of its promotional
campaigns. They must emphasize how the university can foster interactive,
engaging, and modern educational experiences.
Table 10 . Respondents’ Level of Desire Toward Advertised Services
and Products of JRU
62
Std.
DESIRE 4 3 2 1 WM V.I.
Dev.
The advertisements make JRU appear
58 83 141 62 3.26 0.97 Agree
superior to other universities.
The advertised services and products
80 67 124 73 3.33 1.07 Agree
make me want to enroll at JRU.
People around me have influenced my
81 74 127 62 3.41 1.04 Agree
willingness to enroll at JRU.
The advertisements make me more
inclined to enroll at JRU compared to 70 75 136 63 3.32 1.01 Agree
other universities.
The services and products advertised by
JRU make me feel confident about 70 81 125 68 3.32 1.03 Agree
enrolling there.
Categorical Mean/Verbal Interpretation 3.33 1.02 Agree
Legend: WM – Weighted Mean, V.I. – Verbal Interpretation, Std. Dev. – Standard Deviation; 1.00 to 1.49 – Strong Disagree (SD); 1.50
to 2.49 – Disagree (D); 2.50 to 3.49 – Agree (A); 3.50 to 4.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
Table 10 presents the respondents’ perceptions under the Desire
dimension related to the services and products advertised by JRU. The
computed categorical weighted mean (WM) of 3.33 and a standard
deviation (SD) of 1.02 indicate that respondents generally agree that the
advertisements stimulate desire to consider JRU as a preferred institution.
The item “People around me have influenced my willingness to enroll
at JRU” received the highest weighted mean (WM = 3.41, SD = 1.04),
suggesting that social influence plays a strong role in shaping enrollment
intentions. Despite the positive mean, the standard deviation shows a
moderate variation, which may reflect differences in respondents' personal
networks and the nature of the influence exerted.
63
The statement “The advertised services and products make me want
to enroll at JRU” scored a WM of 3.33 with a relatively higher SD of 1.07,
indicating general agreement but with more diverse responses. This implies
that while the advertisements can create a desire to enroll, the strength of
that desire may vary based on individual factors such as program interest
or personal relevance.
Two statements—“The advertisements make me more inclined to
enroll at JRU compared to other universities” and “The services and
products advertised by JRU make me feel confident about enrolling there”—
both received a WM of 3.32, with SDs of 1.01 and 1.03 respectively. These
values show that the promotions are moderately effective in differentiating
JRU from competitors and instilling confidence in potential enrollees,
though the variation suggests that some respondents may remain
undecided or require more compelling evidence.
The item “The advertisements make JRU appear superior to other
universities” had the lowest mean in this dimension (WM = 3.26, SD = 0.97).
Although still within the “Agree” range, this suggests that positioning JRU
as a top-choice university may need stronger messaging, particularly in
comparison to its peers.
Overall, the results indicate that JRU’s advertisements are effective
in creating desire, particularly through social influence and confidence-
building content. However, there is an opportunity to strengthen the
perceived competitive advantage of the university and sharpen promotional
64
messages that inspire stronger emotional connection and decisiveness
among prospective students.
The Desire stage is where interest transforms into a strong emotional
pull. According to Aranella et al.(2024), the psychology to Desire suggested
that individuals are motivated to act when they see a direct connection
between their goals and the opportunities presented. Therefore, JRU
should highlight how attending the university will help student achieve both
short term academic success and long term career aspiration. Emotional
appeals can also be effective in showcasing how JRU supports its students
growths, both personally and professionally.
Table 11. Respondents’ Level of Action Toward Advertised Services
and Products of JRU.
Std.
ACTION 4 3 2 1 WM V.I.
Dev.
The services and products advertised by
JRU have influenced my decision to 65 83 138 58 3.33 0.98 Agree
enroll.
I consider the services and products
promoted by JRU an effective way to 70 74 131 69 3.29 1.03 Agree
attract more students.
The advertisements have encouraged
me to recommend JRU’s services and
61 81 125 77 3.22 1.02 Agree
products to others and urge them to
enroll.
The advertisements have convinced me
64 86 125 69 3.29 1.01 Agree
to definitely enroll at JRU.
I believe JRU’s advertisements lead to
71 79 124 70 3.32 1.03 Agree
increased student enrollment.
65
Categorical Mean/Verbal Interpretation 3.29 1.01 Agree
Legend: WM – Weighted Mean, V.I. – Verbal Interpretation, Std. Dev. – Standard Deviation; 1.00 to 1.49 – Strong Disagree (SD); 1.50
to 2.49 – Disagree (D); 2.50 to 3.49 – Agree (A); 3.50 to 4.00 – Strongly Agree (SA)
Table 11 presents the respondents’ perceptions under the Action
dimension in relation to the advertisements of services and products by
JRU. The computed categorical weighted mean (WM) of 3.29 and a
standard deviation (SD) of 1.01 reflect that respondents generally agree that
the advertisements have a positive influence on their enrollment-related
actions and intentions.
The item “The services and products advertised by JRU have
influenced my decision to enroll” received the highest mean in this
dimension (WM = 3.33, SD = 0.98), suggesting that advertising efforts have
effectively guided decision-making among respondents. The relatively low
SD implies a consistent agreement across the group.
This is closely followed by “I believe JRU’s advertisements lead to
increased student enrollment” (WM = 3.32, SD = 1.03), reinforcing the idea
that the university’s promotions are perceived as impactful tools in boosting
enrollment. Despite some variability in opinion, the general sentiment
remains favorable.
Two statements received the same weighted mean of 3.29:
“I consider the services and products promoted by JRU an effective way to
attract more students” (SD = 1.03), and
66
“The advertisements have convinced me to definitely enroll at JRU” (SD =
1.01).
These results imply that while the advertisements do not necessarily
secure absolute commitment, they are persuasive enough to drive intention
and support favorable decision-making toward JRU.
The lowest-rated item in this dimension, “The advertisements have
encouraged me to recommend JRU’s services and products to others and
urge them to enroll”, received a WM of 3.22 and SD of 1.02. This suggests
a moderate level of advocacy behavior, where some respondents may still
hesitate to promote the university to others, possibly due to limited firsthand
experience or perceived uncertainty.
Overall, the findings suggest that the advertisements are effective in
driving action, particularly in influencing enrollment decisions and
perceptions about promotional impact. However, efforts to strengthen peer-
driven advocacy and reinforce emotional commitment could further
enhance the translation of interest into action.
3. Significant difference on the respondents’ assessment on the
effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using AIDA model
when grouped according to the demographic profile
Age
67
Table 12 . Significant Difference in the Respondents’ Assessment of
JRU’s Advertising Strategy Using the AIDA Model When Grouped
According to Age
Chi-Square Asymp. Sig. Decision
Attention 5.026 .170 Not Significant
Interest 3.458 .326 Not Significant
Desire 3.369 .338 Not Significant
Action 2.594 .459 Not Significant
Summary: AIDA Model 3.822 .281 Not Significant
As presented in Table 12 , the results of the Chi-square test reveal
that there is no statistically significant difference in the respondents’
assessment of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the
AIDA model when grouped according to their age. All p-values across the
four components—Attention (p = 0.170), Interest (p = 0.326), Desire (p =
0.338), and Action (p = 0.459)—are greater than the 0.05 level of
significance. This indicates that respondents, regardless of age, share
relatively similar perceptions of how effectively JRU's advertising strategy
captures attention, generates interest, creates desire, and prompts action.
Moreover, the overall summary of the AIDA model yielded a Chi-square
value of 3.822 and a p-value of 0.281, further confirming the absence of a
significant difference across age groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that
age does not influence how the respondents assess the effectiveness of
JRU’s advertising efforts. The consistent responses suggest that the
68
advertising strategy has a uniformly perceived impact across different age
categories.
Sex
Table 13 . Significant Difference in the Respondents’ Assessment of
JRU’s Advertising Strategy Using the AIDA Model When Grouped
According to Sex
Mann-Whitney U Asymp. Sig. Decision
Attention 13133.500 0.917 Not Significant
Interest 13208.500 0.986 Not Significant
Desire 13081.500 0.869 Not Significant
Action 12910.000 0.717 Not Significant
Summary: AIDA Model 13067.000 0.857 Not Significant
Based on the results shown in Table 13, there is no statistically
significant difference in the respondents’ assessment of the effectiveness
of JRU’s advertising strategy using the AIDA model when grouped
according to sex. The Mann-Whitney U test yielded p-values well above the
0.05 level of significance across all four AIDA components: Attention (p =
0.917), Interest (p = 0.986), Desire (p = 0.869), and Action (p = 0.717). This
indicates that both male and female respondents evaluate JRU’s
advertising efforts similarly in terms of how the advertisements capture
attention, stimulate interest, generate desire, and motivate action. The
summary result of the AIDA model also reflected a non-significant outcome
69
(p = 0.857), further supporting the consistency in perception regardless of
the respondents’ sex. In conclusion, the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising
strategy, as measured through the AIDA framework, is perceived equally by
male and female respondents, suggesting that gender does not play a
significant role in shaping advertising responses in this context.
Program/Course enrolled in
Table 14. Significant Difference in the Respondents’ Assessment of
JRU’s Advertising Strategy Using the AIDA Model When Grouped
According to Program/Course Enrolled In
Chi-Square Asymp. Sig. Decision
Attention 10.011 0.075 Not Significant
Interest 9.660 0.085 Not Significant
Desire 9.180 0.102 Not Significant
Action 9.572 0.088 Not Significant
Summary: AIDA Model 10.184 0.070 Not Significant
As reflected in Table 14 , the Chi-square test results indicate that
there is no statistically significant difference in the respondents’ assessment
of JRU’s advertising strategy using the AIDA model when grouped
according to the program or course they are enrolled in. The p-values for all
four components—Attention (p = 0.075), Interest (p = 0.085), Desire (p =
0.102), and Action (p = 0.088)—are all above the standard alpha level of
0.05, though relatively close to the threshold. This suggests that while there
70
may be slight variations in perception, these differences are not strong
enough to be considered statistically significant. Therefore, it can be
inferred that students across different academic programs generally
perceive the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy in a consistent
manner. In conclusion, the course or program enrolled in does not
significantly influence how students assess the university’s advertisements
in terms of grabbing attention, sustaining interest, creating desire, or
prompting action.
Sources of Awareness about JRU
Table 15. Significant Difference in the Respondents’ Assessment of
JRU’s Advertising Strategy Using the AIDA Model When Grouped
According to Source of Awareness About JRU
Chi-Square Asymp. Sig. Decision
Attention 4.048 0.256 Not Significant
Interest 3.848 0.278 Not Significant
Desire 2.646 0.449 Not Significant
Action 2.072 0.558 Not Significant
Summary: AIDA Model 3.237 0.357 Not Significant
As shown in Table 15 , the Chi-square test results indicate that there
is no statistically significant difference in the respondents’ assessment of
the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the AIDA model when
grouped according to where they first learned about JRU. The p-values for
71
all AIDA components—Attention (p = 0.256), Interest (p = 0.278), Desire (p
= 0.449), and Action (p = 0.558)—are well above the 0.05 level of
significance. Similarly, the overall summary of the AIDA model resulted in a
p-value of 0.357, reinforcing the conclusion that the respondents’ source of
information about JRU, whether through social media, referrals, school
visits, or other platforms, does not significantly affect how they perceive the
effectiveness of the university’s advertising efforts. Therefore, it can be
concluded that regardless of how students came to know about JRU, their
assessments of the university's marketing communication strategy are
generally aligned, showing a uniform reception across different sources of
awareness.
The Chi-square test conducted aimed to determine whether the form
of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using AIDA model. The
result indicate that there is no significant difference in the respondents
advertising strategy of this AIDA model.
CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATION
This Chapter discusses the summary of findings,
conclusions drawn and recommendations based on the outcome
72
of the study Analyzing Jose Rizal University’s advertising
strategy effectiveness on student enrollment.
Summary of findings
The following results were revealed after summarizing the
answers to the research questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in
terms of:
1.1 Age
The respondents’ age profile is as follows: 59.59% of
the respondents belong to age group of 19 to 22 years old.
This is followed by 36.92% from age group 15 to 18 years
old; 2.33% in age group 23 to 26; and 1.16% in age group
27-30.
1.2 Sex
The respondents’ profile as to sex is as follows:
66.28% are female respondents while 33.72% are male
respondents.
1.3 Program/Course enrolled in
Majority of the respondents belong to College of
Business Administration and Accountancy (BAA) with 108
73
respondents or 31.40%, followed by College of Nursing
and Health Sciences (NHS) with 76 respondents or
22.09%; College of Criminal Justice Education (CJE) with
69 respondents or 20.06%; College of Computer Studies
and Engineering (CSE) with 44 respondents or 12.79%;
Hospitality and Tourism Management (HTM) with 39
respondents or 11.34%; and College of Education, Arts &
Sciences (EAS) with 8 respondents or 2.33%.
1.4 Sources of Awareness About JRU
Majority of the respondents learned about JRU
through online media that results to 57.27%; 38.08%
through family, friends, or teachers; 1.16% through
traditional media; and 3.49% selected “Others” as their
source.
2. How do respondents assess the effectiveness of JRU’s
advertising strategy using AIDA model in terms of:
2.1 Attention
Results of the survey shows the highest mean score which is
3.40 with a statement “I have seen the services and products
advertised by JRU through media platforms”. It means that media
74
exposure is a particularly effective channel in reaching potential
students.
2.2 Interest
Results of the survey shows the highest rated statement
which is “The advertisements by JRU are consistent with the actual
facts and offerings” with a weighted mean of 3.38. It means that
respondents find the promotional content credible and aligned with
real experiences.
2.3 Desire
Results of the survey shows that the item “People around me
have influenced my willingness to enroll at JRU” has the highest
weighted mean which is 3.41. It means that social influence plays a
strong role in shaping enrollment intentions.
2.4 Action
Results of the survey shows that the item “The services and
products advertised by JRU have influenced my decision to enroll”
has the highest mean which is 3.33. It means that advertising efforts
have effectively guided decision-making among respondents.
75
3. Is there a significant difference in the respondents’ assessment
of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the
AIDA model when grouped according to their demographic
profile?
There were no significant differences in the respondents’
assessment of the effectiveness of JRU’s advertising strategy using the
AIDA model when grouped according to their age, sex, program or course
they are enrolled in, and to where they first learned about JRU.
Conclusion
Based on the demonstrated findings, it can be concluded that JRU’s
advertising strategy is generally effective in reaching and influencing its
target audiences across the four AIDA dimensions. The strategy
successfully captures attention and generates awareness primarily through
online platforms, aligning well with the university’s young and digitally active
audience. Respondents showed a positive disposition toward the
advertisements, with social influence playing a notable role in developing
desire and supporting enrollment decisions.
However, while respondents agreed on the overall effectiveness, the
levels of interest, desire, and action did not reach “strongly agree”
thresholds. This suggests that there remains a room for improvement in
76
terms of emotional impact, distinct brand positioning, and mobilization
toward enrollment and advocacy.
Most importantly, the lack of significant differences across
demographic groups implies that the strategy has a uniform effect, which
speaks to its inclusive and broad appeal –but it also suggests a potential
need for more tailored messaging to engage different audience segments
more deeply.
Recommendations
In light of the foregoing findings and conclusions, the following
recommendations are offered:
1. Enhance emotional engagement in advertising. JRU should
incorporate more storytelling, testimonials, visual narratives that
resonate with student aspirations and success stories to deepen
interest and desire.
2. Strengthen differentiation from competitors. Emphasize what
makes JRU stand out—-unique programs, industry linkages,
facilities, or career outcomes–to reinforce its competitive edge.
3. Sustain and expand digital presence. JRU should continue to
invest in targeted digital marketing strategies across platforms
popular with youth, and optimize SEO to maintain online visibility.
77
4. Segmented Messaging for different audiences. While
the general strategy works uniformly, develop segment-
specific content to increase relevance and engagement.
REFERENCES
Alqaysi SJ, Zahari AR, Khudari M. (2024). Awareness advertising influence
on consumers buying intention: Exploring attitude as a mediating
factor. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(7): 4568.
https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i7.4568
Aranella, G., and Connor (2024), Desire discrepancy in long‐term
relationships: A qualitative study with diverse couples. Family
process, Vol. 63. p.1201- 1216
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/famp.1296
78
Berridge (2023), Separating desire from prediction of outcome value.
Trends in cognitive sciences, Vol. 27. p.932-946, 2023.
https://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/abstract/S1364-
6613(23)00175-4
Cabrera-Alvarez. P. (2025), Benefits of increasing the value of respondent
incentives during the course of a longitudinal mixed-mode survey.
International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 1-13 2025.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2024.2443
630
Egara and Mosimege (2023), Impact of e-learning for mathematics
learning: Experience of secondary school students. pp. 8163-8172.
https://library.iated.org/view/MOSIMEGE2023IMP2
Funeka, L. P., Govender, N., & Govender, V. (2022). Attracting and
retaining university students through effective marketing and public
relations strategies. International Electronic Journal for Business
Leadership, 11(4), 155–179.
Gibson, M. D. (2024). Exploring the impacts of marketing structure on
enrollment yield in higher education. Illinois State University.
Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., and Telaumbanua, K. (2023), Relationship
student learning interest to the learning outcomes of natural
sciences. International Journal of Educational Research &Amp, 240-
246,2023.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f5e7/1b80a5847e583811dc2e661
c6c06e03ed0a5.pdf
Jambhulkar, M., & Siddiqui, I. N. (2023). Impact of advertisement on
enrollment decision of college students. [PDF file]. Amity University
Chhattisgarh.https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704762.
pdf
José Rizal University. (n.d.). JRU Website. https://jru.edu/
Kowshik, N., Eswhar Rao, L. S., & Yadav, M. (2023). A comparative study
between traditional marketing and digital marketing. International
Journal of Novel Research and Development, 8(5), 568-573.
79
Lazanas and Urbina (2023), Academic Marketing Climate, Marketing
Strategies And Student Enrollment Turnout Of Council Admission
And Marketing In Selected Schools In District 1 Province Of Laguna.
Technium Soc. Sci. J. Vol . 45, 196 - 209. 2023,
https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/techs
sj45&div=17&id=&page=
Labausa, Pinca, and Cruda (2023) Investigating digital marketing strategies
in influencing student enrollment decisions in tertiary education.
Canadian Journal of Business and Information Studies 5 (5), 119-133,
2023.
Leogrande, A. (2025.). The evolution of advertising and market research in
Italy: A growing sector between digitalization and new business
strategies. LUM University Giuseppe Degennaro.
Mueller (2023), Social action advertising: motivators and detractors in
cause-oriented behaviors. Journal of Social Marketing. Vol. 13.
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/jsocm-07-
2022-0161/full/html
Murungi, P. (2024). Advertising strategies and enrollment trends: A case
study of Uganda Christian University. East African Journal of Higher
Education, 9(1), 34–50.
Neyney, Dela Pena, and Mariacos (2023), Solid Waste Management
Awareness and Practices in Baguio Central University: Provision of a
Functional Solid Waste Management Program. Volume:03 , 2024.
https://www.mijrd.com/papers/v3/i5/MIJRDV3I50015.pdf
Noor, A., Golzar, J., et al. (2022). Simple Random Sampling. International
Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 1(2), 78–82.
Ojagh, A., Elahi, A., & Akbari Yazdi, H. (2023). Investigate the Application
of the AIDA Model in the Sport Industry: The Effectiveness of
Advertisements of Famous Athletes on Students' Attitudes. Archives
in Sport Management and Leadership, 1(1), 67-80. doi:
10.22108/jhs.2023.137566.1024
Ogah, A. I., & Abutu, D. O. (2021). Theoretical analysis on persuasive
communication in advertising and its application in marketing
80
communication. Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts, 8(1-2),
313–331. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.17
Rosyiddin, A., Figih, A., and Nugraha, H. (2023), The effect of interactive
PowerPoint media design on student learning interests. Jurnal Kajian
Teknologi Pendidikan, Vol 8, No 1, pp.12-24.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/568127636.pdf
Russell (2023), A process approach to product repair from the perspective
of the individual. Circular Economy and Sustainability. Vol. 3. p.1327-
1359. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43615-022-00226-1
Šević, N., Ilić, M., & Šević, A. (2022). The impact of advertising messages
on school children through age, branded products, and trust.
Research in Pedagogy, 12(2), 417-432.
Sharipova (2024), An Effective Way to Improve the Quality of Education:
Studying Students' Attention, Spanish journal of innovation and
integrity. Vol. 36. P11-26.
https://sjii.es/index.php/journal/article/view/41
Sharma, A. (2024). Importance of Advertising in Business: Key benefits and
insights. Young Urban Project. Retrieved from
https://www.youngurbanproject.com/importance-of-advertising/
Sikalumbi, D. A., Simabwachi, M., Nalumino, M. M., Chirwa, B., & Phiri, W.
A. (2023). Effectiveness Of The Marketing Strategies In Increasing
Student Enrollment In Public Universities In Zambia. In Proceedings
of the 3rd ZAPUC International Conference. Radisson Blu Hotel,
Livingstone, Zambia, June 7–9, 2023. Chalimbana University.
Sikalumbi, T., Banda, N., & Mulenga, K. (2023). Traditional versus digital
advertising in Zambian public universities. Journal of African Higher
Education Studies, 6(3), 77–91.
Siminto, I., Perdana, I., Kamaruddin, M. J., Rijal, S., & Putra, F. A. (2024).
Social media marketing strategy in increasing student enrollment and
retention. AL-FIKRAH: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 202-
213.
Soponyono, A. E., Santoso, A., & Ichsan, M. N. (2024). Marketing
Communication Strategy For New Student Registration. Journal of
Economics and Business, 13(2), 615.
81
Strong, E. (1925) The Psychology of Selling. MacGraw-Hill, Nueva York.
Vangelov, N. (2023). Advertising: In search of a definition. A critical review.
Faculty of Journalism and Mass Communication.
Wijaya, A., Sisca, Indajang, K., Girsang, R. M., & Simatupang, S. (2022).
Brand awareness and their effect on buying interest. World
Economics and Finance Bulletin, 15, 84-91. Retrieved from
https://www.scholarexpress.net/index.php/wefb/article/view/1494
Willey, R. (2023). Adult learners and enrollment drivers: The impact of
scholarships and financial aid. Journal of Continuing and Higher
Education, 41(4), 201–215.
Yoganandham, G. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of digital marketing
strategies in higher education in India: Impact on the sector and the
construction of quality knowledge. Degress Journal, 9(7), 12-25.
Thiruvalluvar University.
Zafar, Mazhar, and Ijaz (2023). Application of Marketing Principles for HEIs:
A Perspective of Pakistani Universities.Works in Marketing Science &
Inspirations, 2023, Vol 18, Issue 1 pg36.
Zhang, Ding, and Xu (2024), Call-to-action or inaction? Call-to-action
buttons hurt in-feed social advertising, International Journal of
Advertising, 1–29. 2024. https://doi.org
10.1080/02650487.2024.2433885
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Request Letter
82
83
84
Appendix B. Consent Letter
Cover Letter to the Dean
February 25, 2025
Re: Request for Permission to Conduct a Survey
To whom it may concern,
Warm greetings!
We are the 4th year BSBA Major in Marketing students from Jose
Rizal University and are currently conducting research entitled, “Analyzing
Jose Rizal University’s Advertising Strategy Effectiveness on Student
Enrollment”, as a major requirement for our Business Research.
In order to achieve the objectives of our study on assessing the
relevance of transaction costs on customer satisfaction, we humbly
request your good office for permission to distribute and conduct survey
questionnaires to your customers with the approval of our Research
Professor and Department Dean thru this letter.
In this regard, we will make sure not to cause any disturbance while
conducting the survey and will only take minimum of 2 to maximum of 5
minutes per respondent. Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary.
Rest assured that all information gathered will be in utmost confidentiality
and will only be used got academic purposes.
This signed request will serve as a consent and approval to conduct the
survey at your good office. Attached herewith is the survey questionnaire
for this study.
Your approval to conduct this survey/study will be highly
appreciated in the completion of this academic endeavor. Thank you in
advance for your assistance with this research study.
85
Appendix D. Survey Questionnaire
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Jose Rizal University’s Advertising
Strategy on Student Enrollment
Part I. Respondents’ Demographic Profile
Directions: Put a (√) corresponding to your answers.
Name (Optional): ______________________________
Age: [ ] 15 to 18 years old
[ ] 23 to 26 years old
[ ] 19 to 22 years old
[ ] 23 to 26 years old
[ ] 27to 30 years old
Sex: [ ] Male [ ] Female
Program/Course:
[ ] College of Education, Arts & Sciences (EAS)
[ ] College of Hospitality & Tourism Management (HTM)
[ ] College of Nursing & Health Sciences (NHS)
[ ] College of Business Administration and Accountancy (BAA)
[ ] College of Computer Studies and Engineering (CSE)
[ ] College of Criminal Justice Education (CJE)
86
Where did you learn about JRU?
: [ ] Traditional media (TV, radio, newspaper)
[ ] Online media (social media, websites, etc.)
[ ] Word of mouth (family, friends, teachers, etc.)
[ ] Others, please specify ____________________
Part II. Respondents’ Assessment
Direction: Please indicate your feedback by marking (√) the
item that corresponds to your evaluation. The status of the
indicators are as follows:
4 = Strongly Agree 2= Disagree
3 = Agree 1= Strongly Disagree
ATTENTION 4 3 2 1
I am familiar with the services and products advertised by JRU.
I often see the services and products advertised by JRU.
I have been informed by others about the services and products
promoted by JRU.
I have seen the services and products advertised by JRU through
media platforms.
The services and products advertised by JRU have attracted my
attention.
87
The services and products advertised by JRU are attractive and
meet my expectations.
The services and products advertised by JRU provide me with up-
to-date information.
INTEREST 4 3 2 1
The services and products advertised by JRU have increased my
interest in the university.
The advertisements have made me more aware of JRU’s
existence.
The advertisements have made me more interested in learning
about the university.
I am interested in promoting the services and products offered
by JRU.
I have discussed the services and products advertised by JRU
with others
The advertisements by JRU are consistent with the actual facts
and offerings.
The services and products advertised by JRU have increased my
interest in the university.
The advertisements have made me more aware of JRU’s
existence.
DESIRE 4 3 2 1
The advertisements make JRU appear superior to other
universities.
88
The advertised services and products make me want to enroll at
JRU.
People around me have influenced my willingness to enroll at
JRU.
The advertisements make me more inclined to enroll at JRU
compared to other universities.
The services and products advertised by JRU make me feel
confident about enrolling there.
ACTION 4 3 2 1
The services and products advertised by JRU have influenced
my decision to enroll.
I consider the services and products promoted by JRU an
effective way to attract more students.
The advertisements have encouraged me to recommend JRU’s
services and products to others and urge them to enroll.
The advertisements have convinced me to definitely enroll at
JRU.
I believe JRU’s advertisements lead to increased student
enrollment.
89
90
Appendix D. Item Reliability Statistic
91
Name: Robert Miguel Sagum
Address: brgy addition hills welfareville compound Mandaluyong City
Contact number: 09603227687
Email Address: robertmiguelsagum675@gmail.com
OBJECTIVES:
BSBA-Major in Marketing Management Seeking employment, Hardworking ready to utilize my skills and
passion for your beautiful company. And I want to share my ability to work with the people to grow personally as
a student. I believe my fast learning ability makes it a perfect fit in any kind of position in your company.
PERSONAL INFORMATION
• AGE: 22 years old
• CIVIL STATUS: SINGLE
• DATE OF BIRTH: JUNE 22, 2003
• PLACE OF BIRTH: MAPANIQUI, PAMPANGA
• HEIGHT: 5’7
• WIGHT: 81 kg
• CITIZENSHIP: FILIPINO
• RELIGION: ROMAN CATHOLIC LANGUAGES: TAGALOG and ENGLISH
EDUCATIONAL DATA
• COLLEGE JOSE RIZAL UNIVERSITY
B.S MARKETING MANAGEMENT
MANDALUYONG CITY, METRO MANILA
• SENIOR HIGH ANDRES BONIFACIO INTEGRATED SCHOOL
SCHOOL INFORMATION COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
MANDALUYONG CITY, METRO MANILA
• HIGH SCHOOL MAPANIQUI HIGH SCHOOL
PAMPANGA CITY, MAPANIQUI,CANDABA
• ELEMENTARY MAPANIQUI ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
PAMPANGA CITY, MAPANIQUI CANDABA
SKILLS
• TIME MANAGEMENT
• TEAMWORK
• GOOD COMMUNICATION
• QUICK LEARNER
WORK EXPERIENCE
AUTO LOAN EXPRESS PH
SALES MARKETING
2024-2025
92
DEDICATION
This paper is the outcome of the researcher’s collaborative
and diligent efforts. This study is completely dedicated to individuals
who have helped and inspired the researchers. From dear parents
and relatives , friends and classmates , teachers,the college of
bachelor of science in business administration major in marketing
management and jose rizal university ,Finally the researchers thank
Almighty God for providing the courage, intelligence and will
necessary to complete this study.To God be the glory.
93