Report paper

Globalization and economic integration

Kurbanova Aziza
Department of world economy
Scientific advisor: Rozimov Bekzod
azizkakurbanova2@gmail.com

Abstract:
Globalization and economic integration are two social phenomena and both of
them have been evident in societies since ancient times, not just in modern
times. Their purpose and intent have remained consistent, but their form and
intensity have evolved over time. This paper explains, first of all, what is
globalization, its historical background, and the drivers of globalization as
well. Next, examines models of economic integration and their impacts on the
national economy (such as income inequality, and poverty), society, and
politics. Lastly, some challenges associated with globalization and economic
integration, as well as, prospects were discussed during the paper.

Keywords:
Globalization and economic integration, hyper-globalization, skepticism,
transformationalism, trade agreement, income inequality, democracy,
international organization, FDI.

Table of contents
Abstract ___________________________________________________1
1
Introduction ________________________________________________3
Literature review ____________________________________________4
Methods ___________________________________________________6
Historical context ____________________________________________7
Drivers of globalization _______________________________________9
Economic integration models __________________________________10
Discussion _________________________________________________13
Conclusion _________________________________________________17
References _________________________________________________18

1. Introduction

2
The shift from industrial to post-industrial society gave rise to widespread
internationalization of the world economy, leading to the concept of
"globalization." One notable aspect of globalization is the increasing
interconnectedness of global economies, as well as the greater integration and
unity of the world economy through the expanding access to national markets
and the deepening collaboration in the international division of labor.

Some place the beginning of globalization at the Age of Exploration, when

Europeans in the 1400s set sail across the Atlantic for shorter spice routes to
China and India. Many mark the voyages of Christopher Columbus and other
sea-faring captains for opening up commercial trade routes across the world
as the beginning of globalization.1
Other scholars view globalization as a far more contemporary occurrence.
Many see it in its current form as a modern phenomenon, beginning no
earlier than World War II.2 The term itself has been in common use since the
1980s.3
After World War II, many nations looked to break down barriers to trade
between nations, promote free trade, and set up global organizations. The
Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 created the World Bank and
the International Monetary Fund (IMF)4
One perspective argues that globalization can only be traced back to the late
1940s, following the post-war period when the United States emerged as the
dominant global economic force. During the latter part of the 20th century,
international agreements such as NAFTA and institutions like the World
Trade Organization played a significant role in lowering trade barriers and
promoting a more unified global marketplace.

Global economic integration has been a long-standing phenomenon, with

trade and communication occurring among distant civilizations since ancient
times. The trend of global economic integration has been generally upward
since the travels of Marco Polo seven centuries ago, involving trade, factor
movements, and the exchange of economically valuable knowledge and
1
National Geographic. "Globalization."

2
Mazlish, Bruce. "Ruptures in History." Historically Speaking, vol. 12, no. 3, 2011. pp. 32-33.

3
International Monetary Fund. "Globalization: A Brief Overview," Page 2.

4
The Bretton Woods Project. "What Are the Bretton Woods Institutions? "

3
technology. Although the process has not always been smooth and has not
consistently benefitted all parties, the overall level of economic integration
among different societies has increased over time. Despite periods of
interruption, such as after the collapse of the Roman Empire or during the
interwar period, the trend has remained upward. In fact, economic
globalization has accelerated over the past fifty years, and, except for human
migration, global economic integration is currently at its highest level and is
likely to further deepen in the future.

2. Literature review

Globalization is one of the most prodigious themes in recent times.

Globalization is a broad and complex term, which has been ongoing for
several decades. Globalization is not new, what is new are the various
dimensions it has taken in recent decades, which should be carefully
disaggregated to understand- its interrelated forms. Rosamond (1999) posits
that the term “globalization” became topical around the mid to late 1980s,
that globalization is loosely defined as it could stand for several factors such
as variations in interaction and communication, integration of markets,
transport, finance, etc. In 2000, the IMF defined globalization as “the
increasing integration of economies around the world, particularly through
trade and financial flows” (IMF, 2000). Discourses on globalization
emphasize terms such as ‘the global village’, “communication”, “information
flows”, and “networks”(Lash & Urry, 1994; Castells, 1996; Hall, 2001;
Friedman, 2005;
Pieterse, 2012), ‘connectivity, proximity’ or reduction of spaces and
distances, time in interactions and similar transactions’ (Giddens, 1999;
Tomlinson, 1999; Pieterse, 2009). McCraw (2005) described globalization as
the ‘intensification of global interconnectedness,’ which has multiple
linkages- the ready-flow and movement of people, pollutants, crime,
services, knowledge, beliefs, goods, images, capital, and fashion across
borders. (Amadi, 2020)

Famous American journalist Thomas Friedman who, in his book The World
is Flat 5and other works, envisions a new world order in which globalization
is unstoppable. Friedman says, that if a given actor strives to avoid
5
Friedman Thomas L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New
York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005; Idem. The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding
Globalization.New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1999.

4
globalization, he must pay the high cost of technological underdevelopment,
economic stagnation, and marginalization in the international community,
and, finally, will inevitably, whether voluntarily or against their will, be
included in the process of globalization. The interconnected nature of the
globalized world enables the development of "open societies," and any
efforts to isolate or restrict oneself are destined to be unsuccessful, especially
with the prevalence of information technologies. Therefore, globalization is
inevitable and the real issue facing humanity is not whether to embrace it, but
rather how quickly it should be embraced, which specific aspects are
significant, and which areas should be prioritized, among other
considerations.

The well-known economist Jagdish Bhagwati 6 holds the same optimistic

view of the globalization process. He states that globalization is
unequivocally profitable for both developed and undeveloped societies, and
thus must be spread and deepened everywhere, including in the poorest
countries, where globalization offers the opportunity to accelerate the most
important stages of development. At the same time, Bhagwati stresses that
globalization does not need a "human face", as it is inherently humanitarian.
Bhagwati compares globalization, defined as the integration of all
communities into a single, global socio-economic system, as equivalent to
economic growth and believes that countries involved in globalization should
focus solely on economic and social development, replacing their strategies.
He regards globalization as the solution to all present problems.
Therefore, hyper-globalization boils down to the following points:
 Globalization is generally seen as a very positive force, with its
associated costs being seen as relatively unimportant.
 globalization is an objective process whose purpose follows the logic
of all human history
 globalization is regarded as having essentially already crossed the
“critical point,” i.e., all that needs to be further addressed are technical
(rather than historical, political, or ideological) questions
 Globalization stands as an undeniable truth, a self-contained solution.
The “Sceptics” argue that internationalization and global connections are
by no means novel phenomena. By placing cultural, economic, political,
social, and technological developments on an evolutionary timeline, the
skeptics argue that globalization has existed for centuries and that the sum
6
Bhagwati Jagdish N. Free Trade Today. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2002; Idem. In
Defense of Globalization. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.
5
 of recent developments only changes the scale and scope of globalization
and not the intrinsic characteristics of the phenomenon itself. They are
concerned with the abstract nature of globalist perspectives, which seem to
be thin on empirical substantiation and make sweeping claims about
processes as if they affect all areas of the world evenly and with the same
responses. They see evidence of the continuing role of nation-states, both
within their boundaries and as agents of the transnational processes of
globalization, through which they maintain as much as lose power. In the
cases of the core, for instance in North America and Europe, states
continue to be very powerful (Martell, 2010). The national identities have a
history and a hold on the popular imagination that global identities cannot
replace, evolving rather than being swept away, and there may even be
evidence of a resurgence of nationalism as old nations come under
challenge but from strongly held smaller nationalisms for instance, former
Yugoslavia, Sri Lanka, and Canada as much as from transnationalism.
(Pannilage, 2017).
The “Transformationalists” are critical of hyper-globalism and wish to
formulate a more sophisticated picture but feel, contrary to skepticism, that
globalization is changing the world... The transformationalists argue that
globalization is the major force underlying the rapid, widespread social,
political, and economic changes that are currently reshaping and
reconstituting modern societies and the world order. The nation-state still
has an important, albeit transformed role. The transformationalist analysis
claims to either rescue globalist arguments (Held et al 1999) or to have a
more sophisticated advance on skeptic arguments (Hay & Marsh 2000).
Thus, it leads readers away from skeptical perspectives and toward either a
revised version of globalism or a more nuanced skepticism that
acknowledges globalization as a reality.

3. Methods

3.1. Research question

What are globalization and economic integration and the effects of these?
3.2. Participants
1. Economists and researchers
2. Government representatives

6
3. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs)
4. International organizations (e.g. IMF, World Bank, WTO)
5. Academics

3.3. Data collection and analysis

1. Data Analysis: Quantitative methods such as statistical analysis, economic

modeling, and data visualization can be used to analyze economic indicators,
trade patterns, investment flows, and other relevant data to understand the
impact of globalization and economic integration.
2. Case Studies: Examining specific case studies of countries or regions that
have experienced significant effects of globalization and economic
integration can provide valuable insights and real-world examples for the
report.
3. Surveys and Interviews: Qualitative methods such as surveys and
interviews with relevant stakeholders, including policymakers, business
leaders, and experts in international trade and economics, can provide
valuable perspectives and opinions on the subject.

4. Historical Context

If we look at history, The global economy underwent significant shifts during

the initial phase of globalization, which took place over the period leading up
to 1914. By the late 18th century, Great Britain had emerged as a dominant
force on a global scale, both in terms of its expansive British Empire and its
technological advancements such as the steam engine and industrial weaving
machine. This period marked the onset of the First Industrial Revolution.
The resulting globalization was obvious in the numbers. For about a century,
trade grew on average 3% per year. That growth rate propelled exports from
a share of 6% of global GDP in the early 19th century, to 14% on the eve of
World War I. As John Maynard Keynes, the economist, observed: “The
inhabitant of London could order by telephone, sipping his morning tea in
bed, the various products of the whole Earth, in such quantity as he might see
fit, and reasonably expect their early delivery upon his doorstep.” Similarly,
investors in cities like New York, Paris, London, and Berlin had the
opportunity to invest in internationally active joint stock companies. This led
7
to the construction of the Suez Canal by the French Compagnie de Suez, as
well as the development of railways in India and the management of mines in
African colonies. Foreign direct investment, too, was globalizing.

The story of globalization continued beyond the end of World War II, as the
global economy entered a new phase. With the United States as the new
dominant power and advancements in technologies such as the car and the
plane from the Second Industrial Revolution, global trade began to increase
once more. Initially, this growth occurred separately due to the division
caused by the Iron Curtain, but with its fall in 1989, globalization became a
truly worldwide phenomenon.

In the post-World War II era, institutions like the European Union and other
free trade agreements supported by the US played a significant role in the
expansion of international trade. Similarly, the Soviet Union also
8
experienced an increase in trade, albeit through centralized planning rather
than free markets. This had a profound impact, with global trade reaching
levels comparable to those of 1914 by 1989, with exports accounting for 14%
of global GDP once again. Additionally, there was a considerable rise in
middle-class incomes in Western countries during this period.

5. Drivers of globalization

Globalization is significantly driven by economic factors such as trade

agreements and the activities of multinational corporations (MNCs). These
corporations are pivotal in the expansion of globalization as they aim to
maximize profits by entering new markets and accessing resources. By
establishing operations in various countries, MNCs contribute to the
development of these nations through investments, job creation, and
technology transfer. The digital economy has expedited this process,
enabling firms to utilize technology to expand their influence. Developed
countries with strong economies are often key drivers of globalization due to
their financial capabilities and capacity to offer capital for investments.

The rapid advancement of technology has been instrumental in driving

economic growth and global integration. Particularly, the swift evolution of
communication technologies has facilitated instant connectivity for
multinational corporations across the globe, leveraging platforms such as
email, video conferencing, and social media. This revolution has not only
streamlined business interactions but also facilitated more frequent cross-
cultural engagement, fostering greater understanding among diverse
populations. Additionally, trade agreements have played a significant role in
boosting the expansion of the digital economy.

Trade liberalization policies, spearheaded by the World Trade Organization

(WTO), have a significant impact on advancing globalization. These policies
are designed to reduce obstacles to international trade, benefiting both
advanced and emerging economies. Governments engage in negotiations to
forge trade pacts aimed at diminishing tariffs and quotas on imported goods,
fostering economic integration, and promoting cross-border trade. This, in
turn, contributes to the governance and advancement of developing nations.
The reduction or removal of trade barriers makes it easier for businesses to
tap into new global markets and reach consumers across the world, serving as

9
a major driver of globalization. Consequently, companies can expand their
global footprint, driving economic growth and creating employment
opportunities in both domestic and international markets. The significant role
in facilitating this process is the World Trade Organization (WTO).

Foreign direct investment (FDI) plays a crucial role in fostering global

integration and international trade. Multinational corporations often establish
operations in developing countries to capitalize on cost savings and access
new markets. By investing in foreign markets, companies can aid in the
growth of economies and target expanding consumer demographics.
FDI, a key driver of globalization, not only brings in financial resources but
also enables the transfer of knowledge and technology across international
borders. Developing nations frequently attract FDI due to lower labor
expenses and abundant natural resources, leading to increased income and
sustainable development. These investments also generate job opportunities
and bolster local economies, as acknowledged by the IMF.

Globalization is driven in part by international financial flows, which are

especially important for developing countries. These flows, facilitated by
financial institutions, facilitate the movement of capital across borders,
promoting investment and economic growth on a global scale. The IMF plays
a key role in overseeing and assisting these financial flows. Capital flows, a
product of globalization drivers, are essential for the global economy and
include foreign direct investment, portfolio investments, and remittances.
They generate income and support infrastructure development, stimulating
economic activities globally. The IMF rigorously tracks these financial
movements.
6. Economic integration models

Economic integration involves the reduction of trade barriers and the

encouragement of economic cooperation between countries. This can
manifest in different ways, such as free trade agreements, customs unions,
common markets, and economic unions, depending on the extent of
integration among member nations. Economic integration is facilitated
through trade agreements,
global value chains, trade blocs, and regional organizations, and serves as a
major catalyst for globalization by fostering economic collaboration and
enhancing interdependence among nations.

10
What is a trade agreement?
Trade agreements are legal documents that aim to reduce barriers between
countries and promote economic cooperation. They take various forms based
on the level of economic integration and involve governments, businesses,
unions, and other stakeholders. These agreements address trade-related topics
such as tariffs, non-tariff barriers, intellectual property protection, and
services.

 Preferential trade arrangements (PTAs) are a type of economic

integration that involves lowering or removing tariffs on specific
goods and services between two or more nations. PTAs can take the
form of free trade agreements, customs unions, and common markets.
While PTAs can create trade barriers between member states and non-
member countries, potentially impacting global trade and growth, they
can also facilitate the exchange of goods and services and promote
economic cooperation. PTAs may include provisions for the
liberalization of services, intellectual property protection, and dispute
resolution.
 Free trade areas (FTA) are geographical regions where member
nations remove tariffs on specific goods and services to facilitate their
unrestricted flow between countries. A notable example is the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), established in 1994,
which eliminated tariffs on most traded goods and services within its
three member countries, simplifying cross-border business operations.
However, individual FTA members may retain trade policies and
regulations for products not covered by the agreement.

 Customs unions are blocs of countries that collaborate to reduce the

costs associated with trading goods and services among themselves.
This is achieved by eliminating tariffs and other trade barriers,
enabling member nations to engage in trade without facing high taxes
or additional fees. Additionally, customs union members establish a
standardized external tariff, ensuring that they apply the same import
duty rate on goods from non-member countries. This practice helps
safeguard domestic industries from competing with cheaper foreign
products.
One example of a customs union is the European Union (EU),
comprising 27 countries that have lifted trade barriers among
11
 themselves and introduced a uniform external tariff on imports from
non-member nations. This arrangement fosters economic cooperation,
encourages intra-regional trade, and shields domestic industries from
external competition. Another instance is the Andean Community of
Nations, wherein four South American countries formed a customs
union in 1969 to minimize trade barriers and enhance economic
collaboration.
 A common market is an agreement among countries that removes
taxes and charges on the movement of goods, services, money, and
people across borders. This streamlines the process for businesses to
trade and enables individuals to travel more freely.
The European Union (EU) and the Southern African Development
Community (SADC) Common Market in Southern Africa are
examples of common markets that have eliminated trade barriers
between member countries. This fosters economic collaboration and
facilitates cross-border business activities and people's mobility.
 An economic union, on the other hand, involves an agreement among
countries to eliminate fees and taxes on trade in goods and services,
adopt a single currency, and establish a central authority to make
economic decisions for the entire region. This allows for unrestricted
exchange of goods and services, easier establishment of businesses,
and freer movement of people across borders.
The European Union, with its 27 member states using the Euro
currency and the European Central Bank as the policy-making body,
exemplifies an economic union that promotes cooperation among
nations, reduces costs for businesses and individuals, and bolsters the
regional economy.
Similarly, the Economic Community of West African States
(ECOWAS) in West Africa, comprising 15 member countries, has also
implemented measures to eliminate taxes on traded goods and
services, adopt a common currency called the Eco, and establish the
ECOWAS Bank for Investment and Development to oversee economic
decisions for the entire region.
If we discuss global value chains, the concept of "global value chain" refers
to a series of functional activities needed to create value, which involves
multiple countries. This has led to the distribution of various stages of value
addition, such as research and development, design, part production,
manufacturing assembly, marketing, and branding, across different countries
based on their efficiency in production and supply.
12
Global value chains, which have been bolstered by the increasing inflows of
foreign direct investment (FDI), are anticipated to have both positive and
negative impacts on sustainable development. The primary goal of global
value chains is to enhance economic efficiency within production networks
by maximizing outputs and minimizing costs to optimize profits. These
chains are also designed to improve access to crucial markets and resources
at national and global levels. However, these strategies and actions can have
mixed effects on society. While global value chains may hinder the growth
of emerging local firms in developing countries due to the rapid market
entry of transnational corporations through FDI, they can also promote
inclusive development in the region. For instance, smaller firms, particularly
export-driven small and medium-sized enterprises, and related industry
enterprises, could benefit from access to networks by forming connections
with large enterprises or even with other small and medium-sized enterprises
within these global value chains. It's important to note that global value
chains also help to enhance the value-added activities of associated small
and medium-sized enterprises in international trade by providing an
established market. Given the significance of these enterprises for
employment, including for women, global value chains can contribute to the
inclusive development of a country. Moreover, the private standards
enforced and technology transfer and training provided by leading
enterprises in global value chains to local suppliers could enhance the
capabilities of small and medium-sized enterprises.

7. Discussion

7.1 Impact on income inequality and poverty

The impact of globalization on income inequality has become a significant

topic of interest among scholars, as it is evident that income inequality and
relative poverty have worsened in most countries since the 1980s. In
developed nations, there has been growing concern about the negative effects
of international trade and capital movements on income distribution,
particularly as the wage gap has widened rapidly with the increasing skill
premium. Many developed countries, including the US, have seen an
increase in Gini coefficients since then. This trend aligns with the Hecksher-
Ohlin theorem, which suggests that international trade would decrease the
share of workers in advanced countries where capital goods are relatively
13
abundant. Although most argue that the impacts of technological progress
were much larger (Klein, 1997), the effects of globalization on inequality
could be considerable since technological progress could be affected by
international competition and globalization, called defensive technological
innovation (Wood, 1994). Globalization could worsen income inequality
more as the production process is divided and some part is transferred to
foreign countries by outsourcing (Feenstra, 1999).

When examining the impact of globalization on poverty, it's crucial to

consider its effects on both economic growth and income inequality, as well
as the reciprocal relationship between inequality and growth. Recent research
on the correlation between inequality and growth offers important insights
into the role of globalization in the interconnected dynamics of growth,
distribution, and poverty. While Kuznets initially described the relationship
between economic growth and income inequality as an inverted U shape,
focusing on the effects of industrialization on distribution, more recent
studies have illuminated how inequality can impede growth. These studies
highlight that unequal distribution can undermine economic growth through
various channels. According to the political economy perspective, high-
income inequality can lead to social conflicts and political instability,
ultimately dampening investment and growth. Viewpoints from the New
Keynesian approach argue that unequal wealth distribution hinders economic
growth as it prevents the poor from affording adequate education for their
children and leads to failures in financial markets due to information
asymmetry. Income inequality can also hinder economic growth by
exacerbating macroeconomic instability and limiting the government's ability
to manage the economy effectively. Lastly, inequality concentrates wealth
and power among a small elite, thereby obstructing the development of
inclusive institutions that could foster economic growth.
7.2 Cultural and social impacts

The influence of globalization on national cultures is a significant aspect of

the modern era. Globalization includes increased communication and
interaction between different countries, which leads to the spread and
penetration of foreign elements into national cultures.
One of the important aspects of the impact of globalization on national
cultures is the spread of foreign culture through the media and the internet.
Today we can get information about other cultures, traditions, and customs
from different sources, which leads to the mixing and crossing of different
14
cultural elements. globalization can also benefit national cultures. It can
promote cultural diversity, and the exchange of ideas and enhance
intercultural understanding. The global community can become more open to
different cultures and values, which contributes to the development of a
multicultural society.

The combination of advanced technology and complex social structures,

fueled by the idea of progress and change, has accelerated social change as a
major impact of globalization. The social dimension of globalization
encompasses the effects of globalization on people's lives, work, families,
and societies. Beyond employment, income, and social protection, other
social aspects of globalization affect people. While there has been an increase
in women's participation in various fields, evidence shows that women still
predominantly work in casual labor. Despite expanding women's access to
employment, globalization has not done enough to reduce gender inequality.
Furthermore, crimes against women have increased significantly due to the
influence of media and other socio-political-cultural factors.

7.3 Political implications

Globalization has had a significant impact on politics, with some suggesting

that it has contributed to the spread of democracy and put pressure on leaders
to democratize. The increase in global democracy since the 1980s may be
attributed to factors such as open economies, international pressure from
institutions, and the influence of norm entrepreneurs. However, there is
debate about whether globalization has directly caused democratization, with
some arguing that the need for democratic governance was a prerequisite for
the policy changes that led to increased globalization.

The relationship between democracy and globalization is complex, with

questions arising about their compatibility. In a globalized world, the
authority of political regimes and the responsibility of governments may be
compromised, leading to concerns about the democratic deficit and the
erosion of public trust in democratic institutions. The growth of international
institutions also raises concerns, as while they can facilitate international
cooperation, they may also diminish decision-making power at the national
level and undermine democracy.

15
Some contend that international institutions could enhance democracy, but
the impact of a highly globalized world on democratic governance remains
uncertain.

7.4 Challenges and criticisms associated with globalization and economic

integration.

Globalization has been condemned for worsening economic inequality within

and between nations, leading to the concentration of wealth and power in the
hands of a few while leaving many individuals and communities behind.
There are concerns about the exploitation of workers, particularly in
developing countries, where labor standards may be lower, resulting in low
wages, inadequate working conditions, and limited labor rights.
On top of that the increased production and consumption as a result of
globalization have strained natural resources and contributed to
environmental degradation, including deforestation, pollution, and the
depletion of non-renewable resources. Critics argue that economic
integration has also led to a loss of cultural diversity and traditional values as
local traditions are overshadowed by globalized consumer culture.
Furthermore, many countries have become heavily reliant on global markets
for economic growth, making them vulnerable to economic downturns and
fluctuations in global demand, leading to instability and vulnerability.
Globalization has also raised concerns regarding the erosion of national
sovereignty, as international organizations and multinational corporations
exert significant influence over national policies and decision-making.
If we look at the financial problem of globalization, the interconnectedness of
global financial markets has increased the risk of financial crises spreading
across borders, as evidenced by the widespread repercussions of the 2008
global financial crisis. Additionally, economic integration has resulted in the
exploitation and depletion of natural resources in many parts of the world as
countries compete to meet the demands of global markets.
These critiques emphasize the multifaceted nature of globalization and
economic integration, prompting important questions about the need for
greater regulation and social responsibility in the pursuit of global economic
growth.

7.5 Globalization and the Future

16
The future of globalization and economic integration is influenced by
numerous factors and uncertainties. There are some potential trends and
considerations. Firstly, rapid technological advancements, including artificial
intelligence and digitalization, will continue to shape globalization and
economic integration by boosting productivity and connectivity. Secondly,
the direction of trade policies among countries will significantly impact
economic integration, with shifts towards protectionism or regional trade
agreements affecting the extent of integration.
On top of that geopolitical factors and environmental sustainability, such as
changes in global power dynamics and international relations, can influence
the prospects of globalization and economic integration, including trade
disputes and geopolitical tensions. Efforts to address environmental
sustainability and climate change may impact production methods, supply
chains, and trade patterns, influencing economic integration.
Addressing inequality and promoting inclusive growth is essential for
sustainable globalization and economic integration, as policies for equitable
distribution of benefits support social stability. Lastly, strengthening global
governance mechanisms and international institutions is crucial for managing
the challenges and opportunities of globalization and economic integration,
requiring cooperation and coordination among nations.
Predicting the future of globalization and economic integration is complex
and uncertain, requiring adaptation to changing circumstances and embracing
opportunities for collaboration and innovation.

8. Conclusion

In conclusion, the main aim of the paper was an understanding of

globalization and economic integration. There are effects on the world
economy, leading to increased trade, investment, and interconnectedness
among nations. While this has brought about positive outcomes such as
economic growth, and technological advancement, it has also faced some
challenges like economic inequality, erosion of national sovereignty, and
environmental degradation. Achieving a balance between the advantages and
challenges of globalization and economic integration is crucial for creating a
more sustainable and inclusive global economic system. Furthermore,
initiatives like free trade agreements have allowed countries to access new
markets and enhance their competitiveness.

17
References
National Geographic. "Globalization."
Mazlish, Bruce. "Ruptures in History." Historically Speaking, vol. 12,
no. 3, 2011. pp. 32-33.
International Monetary Fund. "Globalization: A Brief Overview ," Page
2.
The Bretton Woods Project. "What Are the Bretton Woods
Institutions?"
Friedman Thomas L. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-
First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005; Idem. The
Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization.New York:
Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1999.
Bhagwati Jagdish N. Free Trade Today. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 2002; Idem. In Defense of Globalization. New York:
Oxford University Press, 2004.
Amadi, L. (2020). Globalization and the changing liberal international
order: A review of the literature. Research in Globalization, 2, 100015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2020.100015
Martell, L., ( 2010) The Sociology of Globalisation. Cambridge Polity
Press, USA
Pannilage, U. (2017). An Introduction to the Theoretical Perspectives of
Globalisation. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 1–
18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316939428
Held, D., McGrew A., Goldblatt, D., & Perraton, J., (1999), Global
Transformations: politics, economics and culture. Cambridge: Polity
Press.
Hay, C., and Marsh, D., (2000). Introduction: Demystifying Globalisation’
in Demystifying Globalisation, edited by Colin Hay and David Marsh,
18
 Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Cline, W. R., 1997. Trade and Income Distribution, Institute for
International Economics.
Wood, A., 1994. North-South Trade, Employment, and Inequality, Oxford
University Press
Feenstra, R. C. and G. H. Hanson, 1999. “The Impact of Outsourcing and
High-Technology

19